part seven (end)
And Elisabeth Badinter adds:
| “With the taboo carrying less and less weight and the temptation to defy it becoming greater and greater, it is possible that the universal taboo of incest will fall into disuse.” |
In his book on antisemitism [Ed. -- well-known in Occupied France], Stéphane Zagdanski warned us himself that it was necessary to “decode” his remarks and put his sentence in context. Regarding “antisemites” he writes:
 |
This image has been resized. Click this bar to view the full image. The original image is sized 768×576. |
French film director Jean-Luc Goddard with Stephane Zagdanski (r. with the generous proboscis)
| “Something to decrypt: ‘[Jews] indulge selfishly in that mysterious pleasure of incest to which we are forbidden access.’ The antisemite, you understand, is very much bothered by incest, which is logical, since he suffers from inadequate frontiers.” |
Dr. Georges Valensin [Ed.--author of, in English, “The French Art of Sex Manners” and many other sex books] also reminds us that psychoanalysis, which connects everything to sexuality, was born of a Jewish brain–that of Sigmund Freud:
| “A Talmudic soul, with a need to examine and discuss, [Freud] found sex everywhere. . . . Psychoanalysis was a Jewish affair.” |
Freud, who was steeped in Judaism, had indeed been raised in an observant family of Moravia. He “had also probably read the Zohar, according to which ‘all marrow, all sap and strength of existence comes from the genitals.’”
In Vienna, where he lived, Jews “were extremely numerous, especially in the intellectual middle class,”: the class from which he recruited his clientele. And Georges Valensin writes: “His own Jewish origin must have repelled a number of Christian patients, who were also less neurotic than were the children of Israel, perpetually apprehensive. . . The fact that he had so many circumcised clients could also explain the exaggerated importance attached to the castration complex by the father of psychoanalysis.”
| ”Penis envy, another Freudian discovery, could be explained by the extreme preference given to boys in Jewish families; girls must have deeply regretted not being one.” |
About incest, the good doctor Valensin speaks with mild understatement: “The Oedipus complex,” he writes, “love for the parent of the opposite sex, is also more frequent in the Jewish family, who live much more withdrawn into themselves.” That’s right: “withdrawn into themselves.”
We can therefore conclude with Georges Valensin:
| “Freud generalized repression, probably much more prevalent among Jews clamped down by their morality…. Through psychoanalysis, Christianity would be even more impregnated with Judaism.” |
The psychoanalyst now replaces the priest for healing souls, with the difference that the latter was free, while the former demanded payment.
It is a bit ironic to observe that this “sick people” constitutes a hefty portion of those who claim to care for humanity.
But this is just one of many “paradoxes” of Judaism. The truth is that all these Jewish psychoanalysts do not so much practice their profession in order to care for their patients as in order to try to treat themselves through them.
In any case, it is certainly not a coincidence that Freud built his career on an analysis of hysterical pathology because, on the one hand, he felt directly concerned by it, and secondly, he could see that this evil was widespread in the Jewish community–for the simple reason that incest, which is its source, appears to be much more practiced there than anywhere else.
Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) Wikipedia: “Dr. Jurgen von Scheidt speculated that most of Freud’s psychoanalytical theory was a byproduct of his cocaine use.[25] Chronic cocaine use can produce unusual thinking patterns due to the depletion of dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex. H. J. Eysenck claimed that Freud ‘set psychiatry back one hundred years’, consistently mis-diagnosed his patients, fraudulently misrepresented case histories and that ‘what is true in Freud is not new and what is new in Freud is not true.” 
Author Richard Webster characterized Freud’s work as a “complex pseudo-science”[27].Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen claimed that “The truth is that Freud knew from the very start that Fleischl, Anna O. and his 18 patients were not cured, and yet he did not hesitate to build grand theories on these non-existent foundations…he disguised fragments of his self-analysis as ‘objective’ cases, that he concealed his sources, that he conveniently antedated some of his analyses, that he sometimes attributed to his patients ‘free associations’ that he himself made up, that he inflated his therapeutic successes, that he slandered his opponents.”[2] A 2006 article in Newsweek magazine called Freud “history’s most debunked doctor.”[28]
With his theory of the Oedipus complex, Freud merely projected a specifically Jewish condition onto the whole of humanity, because actually, the famous “Oedipus complex” is above all a “Jewish complex”–that of a mother who sleeps with her own son.
In asserting that neuroses found their origin in the repression of sexual impulses by Christian morality, he again projected his own neurosis and the neurosis of Judaism onto a civilization that he consciously hated. He warned us himself, upon landing in America: “They do not know that we bring the plague!”
[translated from the français by Margaret Huffstickler]
end of chapter on incest of Hervé Ryssen’s Fanatisme Juif