(Continued from https://johndenugent.com/the-nameless-war-by-captain-archibald-maule-ramsay-3-of-4/)
Home Office.
Advisory Committee
Defence Regulation 18B)
London, W. 1.
Telephone : REGent 4784
Ref.: R4
24th June, 1940.
REASONS FOR ORDER MADE UNDER DEFENCE
REGULATION 18B IN THE CASE OF CAPTAIN
ARCHIBALD MAULE RAMSAY, M.P.
The Order under Defence Regulation 18B was made against Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay, M.P., because the Secretary of State had reasonable cause to believe that the said Captain Archibald Maule RAMSAY, M.P., had been recently concerned in acts prejudicial to the public safety or the defence of the Realm, or in the preparation or instigation of such acts, and that by reason thereof it as necessary to exercise control over him.
[JdN: Notice that just one person, the Home Secretary, having ”reasonable cause to believe,” and under that clause, Captain Ramsay was imprisoned FOUR AND A HALF YEARS WITHOUT TRIAL, LAWYER, OR CHARGES. Then he was just abruptly let go after that “ after 4.5 years of his life being taken away.]
PARTICULARS [JdN: the details of the accusation by the government against him]
The said Captain Archibald Maule RAMSAY, M.P.
(i) In or about the month of May 1939, formed an Organisation under the name of the “Right Club,” which ostensibly directed its activities against Jews, Freemasons and Communists. This Organisation, in reality, was designed secretly to spread subversive and defeatist views among the civil population of Great Britain, to obstruct the war effort of Great Britain, and thus to endanger public safety and the defence of the Realm.
Reply.
The formation of the Right Club, as the attached memorandum shows, was the logical outcome of many years of work against bolshevism, carried on both inside and outside the House of Commons, and well-known to all my political colleagues since 1931.
The main object of the Right Club was to oppose and expose the activities of Organized Jewry, in the light of the evidence which came into my possession in 1938, some of which is given in the memorandum.
Our first objective was to clear the Conservative Party of Jewish influence, and the character of our membership and meetings were strictly in keeping with this objective. There were no other and secret purposes..
Our hope was to avert war, which we considered to be mainly the work of Jewish intrigue centred in New York. Later, I and many others hoped to turn the “phoney” war into, not total war, but an honourable, negotiated peace.
It is difficult to imagine a body of persons less capable of being “subversive,” as this Particular suggests, and coupling this charge with the charge of being “defeatist” places this whole Particular in the realm of the ludicrous.
PARTICULAR (ii).
“In furtherance of the real objects of the Organization the said RAMSAY allowed the names of the members of the Organization to be known only to himself, and took great precautions that the register of members did not leave his possession or control ; and stated that he had taken steps to mislead the Police and the Intelligence Branch of the War Office as to the real activities of the Organization. These steps were taken to prevent the real purposes of the Organization being known.”
Reply.
The real objects of the Right Club being the declared objects, and there being no other objects whatsoever, the latter part of this Particular is pure fabrication.
There was only one respect in which our aims differed from the Police and M.I. [JdN: ”Military Intelligence”], namely, the Jewish question.
Neither Police nor M.I. recognised the Jewish menace. Neither had any machinery for dealing with it, or for withholding information from Jewish members of their personnel.
If names of members of the Club had been placed at the disposal of either of these departments, they would have been seized upon by the Jewish members therein, and reported on to the very quarters from which many members wished them to be withheld.
[JdN: So he is saying ‘We kept the list secret because we were afraid of retaliation by Jews. It is not that we had secret purposes; we just did not want to be ruined, have the Jews put us out of business, make us homeless, cause our businesses to collapse and our livelihoods to be gone, and to fall into poverty and despair and have our families out on the street, our wives and kids sitting on the sidewalk. THAT is why the names of the Right Club members were kept secret in that so-called Red Book, that locked book.]
PARTICULAR (iii).
“Frequently expressed sympathy with the policy and aims of the German Government ; and at times expressed his desire to co-operate with the German Government in the conquest and subsequent government of Great Britain.”
Reply.
The latter half of this Particular is a fabrication so preposterous that I propose to treat it with the contempt it deserves.
Lord Marley embroidered this fiction in the Lords a few days after my arrest, insinuating that I had undertaken to be Gauleiter [JdN: the Third Reich term for a governor] of Scotland [ = under a German occupation of Great Britain].
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dudley_Aman,_1st_Baron_Marley
My solicitors [ = lawyers] at once invited him to repeat his remarks outside. Needless to say, he did not do to, for there is not a shred of justification for either this Particular or his slanders.
[JdN: A Member of Parliament, whether of the House of Commons or the House of Lords, is allowed to say pretty much anything without it being illegal. But if one steps outside the Palace of Westminster and says these same things to the public, then he can be sued. So the protection only applies within the House of Lords or Commons, in a kind of immunity, so that is why Ramsay says his lawyers invited Lord Marley to repeat his remarks outside. In other words, this defamation that claimed Captain Ramsay had a ”deal” to become the ruler of a Nazi puppet government over Scotland was an infamous accusation “ and was legally protected from lawsuit only within the walls of Parliament.]
The term “sympathy with the policy and aims of the German Government” is misleading to the verge of dishonesty. It suggests some general agreement or understanding.
Nothing of the kind existed.
I have never been to Germany, and beyond one formal luncheon at their Embassy knew no Germans. What little I had learned about the Nazi system did not appeal to me.
I have never approved of the idea of movements on distantly similar lines being formed in Britain. On the contrary, I disapproved.
My view was that the Unionist Party, once enlightened, was the body best suited to take the needful counter-measures to the Jewish plan, and that to do so successfully it did not even need to go outside the powers latent in our Constitution.
[JdN: Captain Ramsay is basically saying here that he wanted to continue working through conservative organizations and the whole democratic, parliamentary setup that was the British tradition. He did not want a one-man rule, a dictatorship, and the German-style, Third-Reich way. He did not want to radically change Britain at all. He felt the Jewish problem could be solved without going that far.]
In a general way, my views concerning German aspirations coincided exactly with those expressed by Lord Lothian in his speech at Chatham House on 29th June, 1937, when he said :
Lord Lothian (Philip Henry Kerr)
“Now if the principle of self-determination were applied on behalf of Germany in the way in which it was applied against her, it would mean the re-entry of Austria into Germany, the union of the Sudeten-Deutsch, Danzig and possibly Memel with Germany, and certain adjustments with Poland in Silesia and the Corridor.”
[JdN: So what Captain Ramsay is saying here is that one of the top people in the British Foreign Ministry is saying ‘we have treated the Germans unfairly.’ And as for the Germans whom the [1919] Treaty of Versailles separated from the Reich and put as minorities into other countries, this WAS outrageous, and we should have full understanding that the Germans want their own people back. So this says our own [British] government agreed with my view that what we did was wrong and the Germans had a right to be angry and dissatisfied with millions of their people having been put into foreign countries. How am I, Ramsay, now a traitor? I am agreeing with the British government that the Versailles Treaty was wrong!]
The only aspect of the Nazi policy which contacted in any special way with my views was the opposition to the disruptive activities of Organized World Jewry. No patriot “ British, French, German or of any other nationality “ is justified in abandoning the defence of his country to that onslaught, once he has recognized its reality.
To confuse sympathy on this one and loyal point with sympathy with the whole Nazi policy and aims is dishonest; to develop this fallacy into a charge of preferring that system to our own, and being prepared to force that system (of which I disapproved) upon my own country, is the last word in infamy.
PARTICULAR (iv).
“After the formation of the Organization, [he] made efforts on behalf of the Organization, to introduce members of the Organization into the Foreign Office, the Censorship, the Intelligence Branch of the War Office, and Government departments, in order to further the real objects of the Organization, as set out in (i) hereof! ‘
Reply.
Again we have here the fabrication of the wholly unjustifiable charge of a secret and disloyal purpose, already dealt with in Particular (i), and my Memorandum. In regard to the matter of members of the Right Club and Government offices, I would say this:
The objects of the Club being to spread as rapidly as possible the truth concerning the Jewish danger, time was always a vital factor. From the outset we were in a race with the Jewish propagandists.
To counter them in as many different spheres as possible was obviously the quickest method. Ten members in ten different spheres would spread our information more widely, more quickly than ten members all in the same office or club.
Every political group must follow these lines ; this method is the common practice of all political parties.
I never at any time made any effort to get any member a job in any Government Office.
If a member had a choice of two jobs, and didn’t mind which he or she took, and asked me about it, I should clearly have replied that as far as the Club was concerned, the sphere in which we had no member to preach our gospel was the one to choose.
For the knowledge to reach such places as the Foreign Office, War Office, etc., was obviously to achieve the enlightenment of influential persons most rapidly of all.
PARTICULAR (v).
“After the outbreak of war, [he] associated with and made use of persons known by him to be active in opposition to the interests of Great Britain. Among such persons were one, Anna Wolkoff. and one, Tyler Kent, a Coding Officer employed at the Embassy of the U.S.A., with the knowledge of the activities in which Wolkoff and Kent were engaged, he continued to associate with them and to make use of their activities on behalf of the “Right Club” and of himself.
[JdN: Again, these were patriots trying to get the truth to the American people in the election year of 1940 that Franklin Roosevelt was plotting with Winston Churchill to get America despite the fact that Roosevelt was publicly PROMISING TO KEEP AMERICANS OUT OF THE WAR “ among other reasons, because, particularly after June of 1941, the Third Reich was at war with, and trying to destroy communism! It had invaded the Soviet Union to try to CRUSH the USSR! And so even people who didn’t like the Third Reich, and Hitler and his ideas, thought, ‘Well, at least the Germans are trying to destroy communism.’ Everyone knew all along that Hitler was anti-communist, so these people [like Ramsay] didn’t feel they were traitors. They felt that America should not be involved in a war with Germany, and Britain should not either!
And so [Anna] Wolkoff
JdN: Wolkoff was a Russian noblewoman and the daughter of a Russian admiral who was the Russian Naval Attache in London. When the Bolshevik Revolution broke out, they stayed in London and acquired British citizenship. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Wolkoff
and [Tyler] Kent
…did not believe they were ”betraying the United States.” They were telling the American people the truth “ that their president was pro-Soviet, pro-communist, and pro-Jew, and that he was shamelessly lying when he said he was doing everything possible to keep America out of the war — when in fact he was moving heaven and earth to get the U.S. into it.
Here is an especially vile screed against key members of the Right Club: https://alextalbot.blogspot.com/2015/11/special-relationship-britain-and-us-in.html]
In particular with knowledge that Kent had abstracted important documents, the property of the Embassy of the U.S.A., he visited Kent’s flat at 47, Gloucester Place, where many of the said documents were kept, and inspected them for his own purpose. He further deposited with the said Kent the secret register of the members of the ‘Right Club,’ [JdN: that ”Red Book”] of which Organization Kent had become an important member, in order to try and keep the nature of the Organization secret.”
[JdN: He was not trying to keep the nature of the organization secret but its membership, because the members feared retaliation. Their purpose was to end the war.]
Reply.
I have never at any time of my life associated with persons whom I have known to be in opposition to the interests of Britain. On the contrary, my whole record proves that I have devoted more time and trouble than most people to fighting just such persons.
I certainly did not know, and do not now know, that either Mr. Kent or Miss Wolkoff were engaged in activities calculated or likely to harm the interests of Britain.
From my own acquaintance with them both, and conversations I have had during that period, I know they both recognized the activities of Organized Jewry to be one of the most evil forces in politics in general, and one of the most dangerous to the interests of Britain in particular.
All their actions will have been directed to countering those Powers and their designs, and most certainly not to anything that might injure the interests of Britain.
As for myself, I should like to add here most emphatically, in view of various mendacious allegations on the subject that have since reached my cars, that I have never, and of course could never contemplate the communicating of information to enemy quarters.
Having reasonable cause to believe that the Jewish Internationale intrigues to bring about total war radiated from New York City, and knowing that activities were being carried on to sabotage Mr. Chamberlain’s policy of pacification and to bring about his overthrow, it was my obvious duty as a Member of Parliament, and one still loyal to Mr. Chamberlain, to make any investigation I could.
I deposited the Red Book of names of the Right Club members at Mr. Kent’s flat for the period of my absence from London only.
I had heard of several persons who had had their papers (dealing with the same sort of subjects as mine) ransacked by persons unknown in their absence.
As I have stated already, 1 had given explicit assurance of privacy to some of the persons whose names were entered therein. Had their names even come into the hands of the British Secret Police, personated as this force is by Jews, their attitude vis-a-vis the Jewish menace would have become known at once in the very quarters from which they made a particular point of their being withheld, namely, Jewish quarters.
[JdN: What Ramsay is saying here is that the British secret service was full of Jews. So obviously the members of the Right Club did not want the British secret police to know they were in this ”Club.”]
Political burglary is no new thing in this country, when one is suspected of possessing information relating to the activities of Organized Jewry.
Lord Craigmyle, when Lord of Appeal, had his whole house ransacked, every drawer broken open and every paper searched without anything being stolen, at a time when it was reasonable to suppose that his papers contained such matter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Shaw,_1st_Baron_Craigmyle
Thomas Shaw, MP, Baron Craigmyle
The Chief Lieutenant of Police in Edinburgh declared at the time that it was a “political burglary”; the perpetrators were never traced.
(See the letter of Lord Craigmyle, dated 6th July, 1920, entitled “Edinburgh and Freedom,” published in Letters to Israel.)
PARTICULAR (vi).
“Permitted and authorised his wife to act on his behalf in association with, and making use of, persons known by him to be active in opposition to the interests of Great Britain. Among these were Anna Wolkott, Tyler Kent and Mrs. Christabel Nicholson.”
Reply.
There is no truth whatever in this Particular and I propose to treat it with the contempt it deserves.
Needless to say, the Home Office Advisory Committee produced no evidence to support any of the slanders contained in any of the above Particulars.
CONCLUSION
I submit this statement, and the comments on the Particulars, not for my own sake, but to enlighten the country.
[Ill] When things reach a stage wherein a Lord of Appeal, whose papers are suspected of relating to the plans of Organized Jewry, can be “politically
burgled,”
When a White Paper containing vital passages on Jewish World Bolshevism can be immediately withdrawn, and reprinted omitting the vital passages,
When a leading British Industrialist can be blackmailed by Organized Jewry, and coerced into submission by boycott, strikes, acts of sabotage and arson,
When a Member of Parliament, who dares to try and warn the country against this menace of Organized Jewry and their help-mates (the only Fifth Column that really exists in our country) is thereupon imprisoned for three years on false charges,
When these things can happen in Britain, then there must surely be something wrong somewhere.
At a time when Britain and the Empire are engaged in a life-and-death struggle, surely there can be no room for the foul teachings and activities which I have touched upon.
While our sailors, soldiers and airmen are winning victories over the external enemies, surely it is the duty of every patriot to fight this internal enemy at home.
The Prime Minister, in his speech at the Mansion House, stated that he had ”not become the King’s First Minister in order to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire.”
There are more ways than one of encompassing the liquidation of the British Empire today ; and the National Leader who is determined to counter them all will not only need the utmost support of all patriots, but I believe it will be proved that his most formidable difficulties will emanate from just those very powers which I and other members of the Right Club have all along striven to oppose and expose.
APPENDIX 1
THE STATUTES OF JEWRY
[In French] Les Estatutz de la Jeuerie [ = ”THE STATUTES OF JEWRY”] (A.D. 1275) (taken from The Statues of The Realm, Vol. 1, page 221.)
[JdN: You will recall how the Normans conquered England in 1066 in the Norman Conquest, and they continued speaking French for quite a long while, and so two hundred years later they were still speaking French, and a lot of the English law code was written in French “ in England “ hard to imagine, but the Normans were French.
So the Statutes of Jewry were decreed by Edward I, called ”Longshanks,” and he was also famous through the movie ”Braveheart.” He was very much a ”bad guy” in that, because he was trying to crush the Scots.
However, he was the same one who, in England, cracked down at least on the Jews.
This Statute of 1275 came about before the more famous date of 1290, when the Jews in England were expelled “ when the king threw them out. This first decree, the Statues, was not as harsh.
The language of the Statues is a bit hard to understand today and tedious in the translation below, which is in medieval English legalese.
Basically, what he was saying and yet none of it was obeyed, which is why he just up and threw them out fifteen years later, was the Jews can no longer lend money at interest; the Jews must do manual labor (what a laugh); and the Jews must wear a yellow badge so the English people can know they are dealing with a Jew.
But the Jews continued lending money at interest: the Jews continued ritually murdering English children; they refused to wear the yellow badge; so in 1290 Edward I, ”Longshanks,” threw them out.]
Painting of Edward I
THE STATUTES OF JEWRY
Usury forbidden to the Jews.
Forasmuch as the King hath seen that divers evils and the disinheriting of good men of his land have happened by the usuries which the Jews have made in time past, and that divers sins have followed thereupon albeit that he and his ancestors have received much benefit from the Jewish people in all times past, nevertheless, for the honour of God and the common benefit of the people the King hath ordained and established, that from henceforth no Jew shall lend anything at usury either upon land, or upon rent or upon other thing.
Distress for Jews.
And that the distress for debts due unto the Jews from henceforth shall not be so grievous but that the moiety of lands and chattels of the Christians shall remain for their maintenance: and that no distress shall be made for a Jewry debt upon the heir of the debtor named in the Jew’s deed, nor upon any other person holding the land that was the debtor’s before that the debt be put in suit and allowed in court.
Valuing lands taken for a Jew’s debt.
And if the sheriff or other bailiff by the King’s command hath to give Saisin (possession) to a Jew be it one or more, for their debt, the chattels shall be valued by the oaths of good men and be [1 13] delivered to the Jew or Jews or to their proxy to the amount of the debt ; and if the chattels be not sufficient, the lands shall be extended by the same oath before the delivery of Saisin to the Jew or Jews, to each in his due proportion, so that it may be certainly known that the debt is quit, and the Christian may have his land again ; saving always to the Christian the moiety of his land and chattels for his maintenance as aforesaid, and the chief mansion.
Warranty to Jews.
And if any moveable hereafter be found in possession of a Jew, and any man shall sue him the Jew shall be allowed his warranty if he may have it ; and if not let him answer therefore so that he be not therein otherwise privileged than a Christian.
Abode of Jews.
And that all Jews shall dwell in the King’s own cities and boroughs where the chests of the chirographs [scribes] of Jews are wont to be.
Their badge.
And that each Jew after he shall be seven years old, shall wear a badge on
his outer garment, that is to say, in the form of two tables joined of yellow felt of the length of six inches and of the breadth of three inches.
Their tax.
And that each one, after he shall be twelve years old pay three pence yearly
at Easter of tax to the King whose bond-man he is ; and this shall hold place as well for a woman as for a man.
Conveyance of land, etc., by Jews.
And that no Jew shall have the power to infeoff (take possession of) another whether Jew or Christian of houses, rents, or tenements, that he now hath, nor to alien in any other manner, nor to make acquittance to any Christian of his debt without the special license of the King, until the King shall have otherwise ordained therein.
Privileges of the Jews.
And forasmuch as it is the will and sufferance of Holy Church that they may live and be preserved, the King taketh them under his protection, and granteth them his peace ; and willeth that they be safely preserved and defended by his sheriffs and other bailiffs and by his liege men, and commandeth that none shall do them harm or damage, or wrong in their bodies or in their goods, moveable or immovable, and they shall neither plead nor be impleaded in any court nor be challenged or troubled in any court except in the court of the King whose bondmen they are ; and that none shall owe obedience, or service or rent except to the King or his bailiffs in his name unless it be for their dwelling which they now hold by paying rent ; saving the right of Holy Church.
Intercourse between Jews and Christians.
And the King granteth unto them that they may gain their living by lawful merchandise and their labour, and that they may have intercourse with Christians in order to carry on lawful trade by selling and buying. But that no Christian for this cause or any other shall dwell among them. And the King willeth that they shall not by reason of their merchandise be put to lot and soot nor in taxes with the men of the cities and boroughs where they abide ; for that they are taxable to the King as his bondmen and to none other but the King.
Holding houses and farms, etc.
Moreover the King granteth unto them that they may buy houses and castilages in the cities and boroughs where they abide, so that they hold them in chief of the King ; saving unto the lords of the fee their services due and accustomed. And that they may take and buy farms or land for the term of ten years or less without taking homages or fealties or such sort of obedience from Christians and without having advowsons [ = ”the right of presentation of a candidate to a benefice or church office.”] of churches, and that they may be able to gain their living in the world, if they have not the means of trading or cannot labour; and this licence to take land to farm shall endure to them for fifteen years from this time forward.
[end]
The Parliament which passed this Statute included representatives of the Commons, and this was probably the first Statute in the enactment of which the Commons had any part.
It is significant that the first evidence of the feelings and wishes of the commoners should have expressed itself in such a form as in these Statues of Jewry, in face of the fact, clearly evident in the script, that the Kings owed much to Jewish activities, having demanded monies from the Jews regularly and permitted them in turn to recoup themselves from the people.
[JdN: In other words, the kings, the rulers, benefited from the Jews because they could borrow money from them; it was the people, the common people, who suffered from their presence.]
APPENDIX 2
THE JEWS IN BRITAIN
1215 Magna Carta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta
The Magna Carta (Latin for ”Huge Charter,” originally known as the ”Charter of Liberties”) of 1215 was written in iron gall ink [made from iron salts and oak tannin] on parchment in medieval Latin, using standard abbreviations of the period. It was authenticated with the Great Seal of King John, and was reaffirmed by Edward I, Longshanks, in 1297.
[JdN: This is when the nobles of England rose up, and demanded that the king accord them, and the people, certain rights, and to Parliament some rights. They would have to approve certain things, such as how the money is spent, and so forth. It was not to be an absolute dictatorship any more.
As Wikipedia says: ”Magna Carta still forms an important symbol of liberty today, often cited by politicians and campaigners, and is held in great respect by the British and American legal communities, Lord Denning describing it as “the greatest constitutional document of all times “ the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot”.‘
The American Bar Association’s Tribute to the Magna Carta at Runnymede
It was signed at Runnymede, 20 miles west of London, in an ancient meadow the Anglo-Saxons already had used for regular meetings.]
1255 Ritual murder of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln. Henry III personally ordered trial and 18 culprits were executed ” all Jews.
1275 The Statute of Jewry passed ; it confined Jews to certain areas, forbade usury to them and also ownership of land and contact with the people: compelled them to wear a yellow badge.
1290 Edward I banished the Jews from England.
JdN: Fast forward now to 1657…]
1657 Oliver Cromwell, having been financed by Manasseh Ben Israel and Moses Carvajal, allows Jews to return to England, though the order of banishment was never rescinded by Parliament.
1689 Amsterdam Jews financed the rebellion against King James II. The chief of these ” Solomon Medina ” follows William of Orange to England.
1694 [JdN: So here is the ”biggie” now….] The “Bank of England” is set up and the National Debt instituted, securing for the Jew moneylenders a first charge on the taxes of England for interest on their loans. The right to print money was transferred from the Crown [ = the king] to this “Bank of England”.
[JdN: This was the beginning of the Jewish economic takeover of England. In other words, this bank owned by Jews would print all the British money, all the British pounds, the coins, everything. It would all come from the Jews. Basically, the Bank of England would lend money to the government at interest, whereas before that, the government — the king “ just made the money. The king has to borrow money from the Jews. And ever since then, the British pound has been borrowed from Jews. It is just incredible, so incredible, that people can’t believe it and that is the problem.]
1707 [JdN: Final item….] Economic and political union forced upon Scotland against the vote of every county and borough ; the national debt foisted upon Scotland, and the royal mint in Edinburgh suppressed.
APPENDIX 3
FAMOUS MEN ON THE JEWS
Seneca around A.D. 60
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seneca_the_Younger
Bust of Seneca in the Antikensammlung, (”Antiquities Collection”) Berlin. (The other head, facing the other way, is that of Socrates)
“The customs of this accursed people have grown so strong, that they have spread through every land”.
St Justin 116 A.D.
“The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith.”
Mohammed 570
“It is incomprehensible to me, why one has not long ago expelled these
death-breathing beasts … are these Jews anything else but devourers of men?”
Martin Luther 1543
”On the Jews and Their Lies”(1543)
luther-martin-on-the-jews-and-their-lies
“How the Jews love the book of Esther, which is so suitable to their
bloodthirsty, revengeful, murderous appetite and hope. The sun has never shone on such a bloodthirsty and vindictive people, who cherish the idea of murdering and strangling the heathen. No other men under the sun are more greedy than they have been, and always will be, as one can see from their accursed usury.
They console themselves that when their Messiah comes he will collect all the gold and silver in the world and divide it among them.”
Clement VIII Pope 1592
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Clement_VIII
“All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate peoples into a state of poverty, especially farmers, working-class people, and the very poor.”
Voltaire 1694
“The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which have for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and inextinguishable hated of all peoples by whom they are tolerated, and through whom they are enriched.”
“I decided to improve the Jews: but I do not want any more of them in my Kingdom: indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the vilest nation in the world.”
Benjamin Franklin 1789
Statement in the [Constitutional] Convention [in Philadelphia in 1789], concerning Jewish Immigration:
Franklin, Adams and Jefferson
“There is a great danger for the United States of America, this great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the Jews have settled, they have depressed the normal level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty.
They have remained apart and unassimilated ” they have created a state within a state, and when they are opposed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain. For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate ” namely, that they were driven out of their motherland, but gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires ” they cannot live among themselves ; they must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race.
“If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than 100 years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of Government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands.
“I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children’s children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The Jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil our institutions ” they should be excluded by the Constitution.”
Copy of leaflet designed by the Author after the [1938] Munich Agreement:
Are you Aware that . . .
MR CHAMBERLAIN
was Burnt in Effigy
in Moscow
as soon as it was known that
he had secured Peace, show-
ing very clearly WHO
WANTED WAR and who
are still working ceaselessly
to stir up strife all the world
over ?
Issued by the MILITANT CHRISTIAN PATRIOTS, 93 Chancery Lane,
W.C 1 (HOLborn 2137), and printed by W. Whitehead, 22 Lisle st,
W.C2
APPENDIX 5
Reprinted from Free Britain June 1954
THE OFFICIAL GAG
Lord Jowitt, either with a belated desire to do Justice to Captain Ramsay or now cautious of repeating the fabrications of the past, has admitted in his memoirs of the War Trials,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jowitt,_1st_Earl_Jowitt
… published in the London Evening Standard of May 13th, [1952] that the defendants in the Tyler Kent affair were all along acting in good faith.
Lord Jowitt, in order to publish these memoirs at all, has been forced to make a point which neither Captain Ramsay nor Anna Wolkoff are even yet permitted to make in their own defense, the nature of the documents concerned in the case having been declared an ”Official Secret” which they may not divulge.
Others, however, are now free to state what they have known from the beginning, namely, that Captain Ramsay was never at any time endeavouring to communicate with Germany but was trying to communicate certain information to the then Prime Minister, Mr. Chamberlain, which Mr. Chamberlain was expecting, but which, because of Captain Ramsay’s arrest, never reached him.
Something of this information later reached Mr. Chamberlain by other channels, however, for it was disclosed in the Forrestal Diaries that Mr. Chamberlain had become convinced, and actually told Mr. Forestall, that powerful Jewish circles in New York were solely responsible for maneuvering Britain into the war, unsuspected by him at the time, although he was Prime Minister, and ought to have been informed of what was going on.
The wedge that was driven between Mr. Chamberlain and Captain Ramsay was the lock-up and the abuse of the Official Secrets Act, followed by the elaborate dissemination of the complete fabrication by the Home Office that “the said Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay, M.P. . . had expressed his desire to co-operate with the German Government in the conquest and subsequent government of Great Britain.
[JdN: In other words, this was a direct accusation of treason, claiming Ramsay was in touch with the Germans, and that after they had conquered Great Britain, he would become the puppet leader of Scotland, as I have said before “ an infamous accusation.]
Later the Lord Marley added further to this fabrication by stating in the House of Lords that he had it on good authority that Captain Ramsay had agreed to become Gauleiter of Scotland under a German occupation of Great Britain. He ignored the challenge of Captain Ramsay’s lawyers to repeat the charge outside the House.
For fourteen years Lord Jowitt must have been well aware that Captain Ramsay was conducting an investigation in order to satisfy Mr. Chamberlain that there was documentary evidence for the facts already disclosed to him by Captain Ramsay, and that Captain Ramsay’s arrest was made to prevent that documentary evidence from being presented to the Prime Minister.
But it has taken all these years for Lord Jowitt to concede that Captain Ramsay is an honest man who “would never have countenanced any act which he recognized as being against the interests of his country.”
¦..The final item in this appendix is the German White Book on the last phase of the 1939 German-Polish crisis
The German White Book, presented herewith, is a collection of official documents and speeches, not a collection of uncontrollable conversations. It does not pretend to cover the entire field of German-Polish relations but, as the title implies, concerns itself solely with the last phase of the German-Polish crisis, from August 4th to September 3rd, 1939.
The Polish-German controversy concerning the Corridor, Upper Silesia and Danzig, began in 1919; it has never, since the signing of the Versailles Treaty, ceased to agitate Europe. For many years intelligent commentators and statesmen of all nations, including Great Britain, agreed that the separation of East Prussia from the Reich and, indeed, the whole Polish settlement, was unjust and fraught with danger.
Germany again and again, made attempts to solve the differences between the two countries in a friendly spirit. It was only when all negotiations proved vain and Poland joined the encirclement front against Germany, that Chancellor Hitler cut the Gordian knot with the sword. It was England that forced the sword into his hand.
Great Britain asserts in her Blue Book and elsewhere that she was compelled to “guaranty” Poland against “aggression” for reasons of international morality. Unfortunately the British Government subsequently admitted (Under-Secretary of State Butler, House of Commons, October 19, 1939) that the “guaranty” was aimed solely against Germany.
[JdN: The salient point is that Britain had no objection when the Soviet Union attacked Poland from the east. They had no problem with that, and did not declare war on Russia. They only declared war Germany. This shows who was behind the whole thing.]
It was not valid in case of conflicts with other powers. In other words, the British “guaranty” was merely a link in the British encirclement chain. The Polish crisis was deliberately manufactured by Great Britain with the connivance of Poland. It was the fuse designed to set off the explosion!
Great Britain naturally attempts to becloud this fact. Official British statements on the outbreak of the war place great emphasis on the allegation that England did not give a formal “guaranty” to Poland until March 31, 1939, whereas the German demand on Poland, which Poland rejected, was made on March 21st.
Britain contends that the British “guaranty” was merely the consequence of the German demand of March 21st.
Britain denies that her “guaranty” stiffened Polish resistance. She insists that Germany took advantage of a moment of highly strained international tension by springing upon Poland her demand for an extra-territorial road through the Corridor between the Reich and East Prussia.
The British ignore a vital fact in this connection. The existence of the “guaranty”, not its formal announcement, was the decisive factor. The future may reveal when the British promise was first dangled before Poland. In any event, Poland was assured of British aid before March 21st.
[JdN: In other words, it does not matter when the British government publicly announced what it was saying in private. What counts is what was said in private between the British and Polish governments. àf you go to war with Germany, we’ll back you up.’ So if you are Poland, why negotiate? ‘Britain will be fighting on our side.’ And France will jump in, and then we’ll clean the Germans’ clock.’
The Poles actually had this dream of taking over Berlin, of taking a third of Germany away. They openly talked about it.]
Chamberlain’s speech of March 17, 1939, and the statement by Lord Halifax of March 20th, (both reprinted in the British Blue Book) leave no doubt on that question. The British “guaranty” was in the nature of a blank check. Poland did not know, when she marched to her doom, that this check would not be honored.
Edward Frederick Lindley Wood, First Earl of Halifax
The allegations that the Poles were surprised or overwhelmed by the German proposals, does not hold water. Poland was fully informed of the German demands. When as Herr von Ribbentrop [the foreign minister of the Reich] points out in his Danzig speech (October 24, 1939) Chancellor Hitler in 1934 concluded a Friendship and Non-Aggression Pact with Marshal Pilsudski, it was clearly understood that the problem of Danzig and the Corridor must be solved sooner or later. Chancellor Hitler hoped that it would be solved within the framework of that instrument.
Poland callously disregarded her obligations under the German-Polish Pact, after the death of Marshal Pilsudski. The persecution of German minorities in Poland, Poland’s measures to strangle Danzig economically, the insolent manner the Polish Government chose to adopt with the British blank check in its pocket and the Polish mobilization frustrated Chancellor Hitler’s desire to settle Polish-German differences by peaceful negotiation, as he had solved every other problem arising from the bankruptcy of statesmanship at Versailles.
No one can affirm that the National Socialist Government did not attempt with extraordinary patience to impress upon Poland the desirability of a prompt and peaceful solution. The Polish Government was familiar with the specific solution proposed by Chancellor Hitler since October 24, 1938. The nature of the German proposals was discussed at least four times between the two governments before March 21, 1939.
On October 24, 1938, von Ribbentrop, the German foreign Minister, proposed to the Polish Ambassador, Lipski, four steps to rectify the injustice of Versailles and to eliminate all sources of friction between the two countries.
One, the return of the Free City of Danzig to the Reich, without severance of its economic ties to the Polish State. (The arrangement vouchsafed to Poland free port privileges and extra-territorial access to the harbor.)
[JdN: ”Extra-territorial access” means that you have a road, and the people of this other country can drive on that special road, and do not have to go through customs, show their passport, and whatnot. As long as they stay on that road and just got from Point A to Point B, they can do so. They can cross over, say, German territory, even though they are Poles, to get to their facilities and their part of the harbour, so their ships can load and unload. So an extraterritorial road is an access road.]
Two, an extraterritorial [sic] route of communication through the Corridor by rail and motor to reunite Germany and East Prussia.
[JdN: So what had happened, of course, after the Treaty of Versailles, is that the easternmost part of Germany was chopped off from the rest of Germany, and a big chunk of Poland was stuck in the middle. So the question for the Germans was, things were unfriendly, and we have to go through customs to get to another part of our own country. We have to go through a hostile country to get to another part of our own country. And that was very nerve-racking, and it was not good. So the proposal was that Hitler was going to build an autobahn, one of his superhighways, and a railroad, and so forth, dedicated strictly to Germans going back and forth. Only Germans could go on it, no Poles, like a little strip, a thin little strip of Germany going across Poland to their territory.
By the way, after World war Two, when there was an East and West Germany, and yet within EAST Germany you had the city of Berlin, and the western half of that was West Berlin, part of the Western Bloc, the NATO Bloc, and connected by various ties to West Germany, then the question is how to get there.
So the East and West German governments had a deal, an extraterritorial autobahn deal, where trains and cars on the autobahn could go straight across the East-West German border, and go straight to West Berlin. They could not get off, just pull off for gas (petrol), on the highway, but you could not take the exit ramps. You could not get off the highway. So it was an extraterritorial route so you cold get from one part of your territory to the other part without having hassles.
So it can be done, and that is what Hitler had proposed, that between the bulk of Germany and East Prussia special train and superhighway areas be created where Germans could go back and forth without any trouble from the Poles or any problem.]
Three, mutual recognition by the two States of their frontiers as final, and, if necessary, a mutual guaranty of their territories.
Four, the extension of the German-Polish Pact of 1934 from ten to twenty-five years.
On January 5, 1939, Poland’s Foreign Minister, Josef Beck, conferred with the German chancellor on the problems involved. At this time Chancellor Hitler offered Beck a clear and definite guaranty covering the Corridor, and on the basis of the four points outlined by von Ribbentrop. The following day, January 6th, at Munich, the German Foreign Minister once more confirmed Germany’s willingness to guaranty, not only the Corridor, but all Polish territory.
The generous offer for a settlement along these line, liquidating all friction between the two countries, was reiterated when Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop paid a state visit to Warsaw (January 23rd to 17th, 1939).
On that occasion von Ribbentrop again offered a guaranty of the Polish-German boundaries and a final, all-inclusive settlement of German-Polish relations.
Under the circumstances it is absurd to allege that Poland was “surprised” by the German proposal of March 21st, and by subsequent developments. It is possible that Poland may have concealed Germany’s friendly and conciliatory offers from Paris and London. With or without British promptings, Poland prepared the stage for a melodramatic scene, in which the German villain brutally threatened her sovereignty and her independence.
In spite of Polish intransigence, culminating in threats of war, Chancellor Hitler made one more desperate attempt to prevent the conflict. He called for a Polish plenipotentiary [JdN: term coming from the Latin word meaning ”with full power,” meaning an ambassador authorized to negotiate; he does not have to get on the phone every five minutes and talk with his leader, but he has the power to sit down and negotiate seriously; he is not just a flunky or a messenger: he is there to handle the negotiations] to come and discuss the solution presented in Document 15 of the German White book.
This solution envisaged the return of Danzig to the Reich, the protection of Polish and German minorities [JdN: there being Poles living on the German side as well as Germans living on the Polish side], a plebiscite in the Corridor under neutral auspices, safeguarding, irrespective of the result, Poland’s unimpeded extraterritorial access to the sea.
[JdN: Hitler meant by this that parts of the Polish Corridor were overwhelmingly German, and given unnecessarily to Poland, but Poles still needed to get to the sea, have shipping and ports and not be landlocked. But in his view, they were mistreating the Germans, and he would not put up with that. Let those people return to being part of Germany.]
The British are please to describe this reasonable document as an “ultimatum”. This is a complete distortion of the facts. The German government, it is true, had set a time-limit (August 30th) for the acceptance of its proposal, but it waited twenty-four hours after its expiration before concluding that the possibilities of diplomatic negotiations had been exhausted. There was ample opportunity for England and Poland to act within those twenty-four hours.
The British take the position that Germany’s demands were not known either in Warsaw or London. That pretense is demolished by the British Blue Book itself, for we find here a dispatch from Sir Nevile Henderson, the British Ambassador to Berlin, which leaves no doubt that he relayed the German proposal to London after his midnight conference with von Ribbentrop on August 30th, and that he understood the essential points of the German proposal.
Henderson even transmitted to the British Government Chancellor Hitler’s assurance that the Polish negotiator would be received as a matter of course on terms of complete equality with the courtesy and consideration due to the emissary of a sovereign state.
Henderson sent his night message not only to Downing Street, but also to the British Embassy in Warsaw. There is evidence, which has recently come into the possession of the German Foreign Office that, in spite of all its protestations of ignorance and helplessness, the British Cabinet communicated the substance of Henderson’s midnight conversation with the German Foreign Minister directly to the Polish Government.
The London Daily Telegraph, in a late edition of August 31st, printed the following statement:
“At the Cabinet Meeting yesterday, at which the terms of the British Note were approved, it was decided to send a massage to Warsaw, indicating the extent of the latest demands from Berlin for the annexation of territory”.
This item appeared only in a few issues. It was suppressed in later editions.
Germany’s demands were so reasonable that no sane Polish Government would have dared to reject them. They certainly would have been accepted if England had advised moderation. There was one more chance to preserve peace on September 2nd. It was offered by a message from Premier Mussolini (Document 20). The Italian suggestion was acceptable to Germany and France (Document 21), but was rejected by Great Britain (Document 22).
***
I wish to thank Scottish-American Jamie Anderson of North Carolina
….and the founder and main curator of Leofrank.org
for generously financing this vital project of the
creation of new audio and online versions
of Captain Ramsay’s printed 1952 book
The Nameless War.
