ENGLISH Leftist magazine admits Allied D-Day war crimes policy; Tom Hanks the hypocritical crypto-Jew

Spread the love

DEUTSCHE ARTIKEL RECHTS/ARTICLES FRANCAIS A DROITE

===============

The gorgeous photo below is just a little bit risqué, but it made me feel a real admiration and love for all our beautiful Aryan women, whom we white men must cherish and protect as our natural duty. (In German the wording says ” Love your race.”)

The Third Reich actually encouraged a kind of natural nudism in art, with beautifully shaped young men and women disrobing for a swim in a creek or another natural setting such as a forest clearing. The Reich promoted the body beautiful, a good birth rate and a healthy eros of heterosexual attraction — especially to cure the nation of the Weimar Republic’s ju-promoted gay pride movement, which was boosted incessantly by the juish queer Magnus Hirschfeld of the Intitut für Sexualwissenschaft (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Hirschfeld)

* * *

Compare that image with this sicko 1919 Weimar Republic movie, made by juze 14 years before the Germans had had enough and voted Hitler into power:

==============MARK OF THE JEW

Class, here is a perfect example of how a hate-filled Jew writes, reacting to yesterday’s blog praising the great Slavic genius Nilkola Tesla:

* * *

Author : Jim Edwards (IP: 99.238.217.129 , CPE000feafc191b-CM001868d9555e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)

E-mail : jedgaronomous@yahoo.com

URL    :

Whois  : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=99.238.217.129

Comment:

Most, if not all of Russia is one big Slavic shit hole.

* * *

Keep it up, juboy “Jim Edwards” [sic]. The “Slavic shithole,” as you call it, has 30,000 hydrogen bombs and a long memory of what you bolshevik juze did to their nation — 40 million tortured and killed.

And your little Israel will some day, unless it repents its wickedness, become a molten pool of green glass.

* * *

Comrades,  I translated most of this issue myself.

Read it online right here! 🙂

https://johndenugent.com/russia_and_jews.pdf

=========SICK OF THIS “GREATEST GENERATION” EXAGGERATION

The chicken hawks Tom Brokaw, who never served in uniform (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Brokaw) despite the draft being in effect then (heck, even Elvis Presley had to go in), and Tom Hanks, THE JEW (MOTHER’S MAIDEN NAME WAS “FRAGER,” A CLASSIC JEWISH NAME, NOT “PORTUGUESE,” AND I HAVE MET SEVERAL FRAGERS, ALL JEWS) who never did serve either (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Hanks), have been sucking up to the WWII generation and selling books and movies — and making million$ — off these World War Two vets who DID go, fight and bleed, and off their families. While our men fought bravely, not all of them were able to withstand the Rosenveltian progaganda to hate the enemy and violate the very sensible rules of war.

“Go be a brave soldier and fight my enemies for me, goy.” Dark, curly-haired Tom Hanks, 2004, AND NOW WE KNOW WHY HE AND STEVEN SPIELBERG ARE BEST BUDDIES.

In point of fact, in October 1941 79% of Americans in a Life magazine poll were AGAINST us entering WWII. But the draft came after Pearl Harbor and off we went to kill for Rosenvelt, or be arrested for refusal to report for induction.

Below is the latest on the fraudulent author Stephen Ambrose, another “Greatest Generation” suckup, who made stacks of cash glorifying Dwight Eisenhower, who was responsible for not just the atrocity of Dresden, where 300,000 German civilians were BURNED ALIVE, but also for the infamous postwar POW DEATH camps on the Rhine meadows, where nearly a million men PERISHED in giant fields with NO TENTS, NO LATRINES and  ALMOST NO FOOD or WATER for MONTHS.

=========IKE

I LOVE THAT ICY IKEY SMILE….Looks like a child molester.

Below is a photo of his mega-death camp at Bad Kreuznach, from an aerial photo taken by Operation Trolley, when the US Army Air Force overflew defeated Germany in mid-May 1945 (article from Der Spiegel, in a rough Google translation here:  http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.spiegel.de/home/seite2/&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&twu=1&usg=ALkJrhh5bJf_sLdvWBVAiULuCtn_6ts89w). They photographed the damage they had caused to the land of their white brothers and sisters.

Those ants down there, comrades, are our German brothers….in OPEN fields…. Imagine how they felt at night in the wet, dark mud — shivering, hungry, defeated …and dying because Eisenhower would not let food through.

James Bacque’s Other Losses tells the horrid truth about these gigantic starvation camps…. Bacque was a bestselling Canadian author — until he told the truth about Eisenhower.

The once gorgeous Reich Chancellery…..

1939…..Hitler’s office

1945….

* * *

Now we learn that the Eisenhower-glorifying Stephen Ambrose was just as much of a liar as his idol…..

* * *

Author Stephen Ambrose, a founder of National WWII Museum, is accused of fabrication

Stephen Ambrose stands front and center at the opening of the National World War II Museum in 2000.

He is joined by dignitaries and celebrities such as Tom Hanks, Steven Spielberg, Tom Brokaw, and U.S. Sens. Mary Landrieu and John Breaux. Times-Picayune archive

By Katy Reckdahl, The Times-Picayune

April 27, 2010, 7:41PM

The late New Orleans historian and best-selling author Stephen Ambrose fabricated some of the meetings he had with President Dwight Eisenhower, broadly exaggerated how much time he had spent with the president and, despite a story he often told, did not receive a phone call out of the blue from Eisenhower asking him to write his official biography, according to writer Richard Rayner in this week’s edition of The New Yorker magazine.

The allegations were raised by officials at the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum in Abilene, Kan., who discovered conflicting details as they looked for items to display at an anniversary event for Ambrose’s Eisenhower biography. As Tim Rives, the museum’s deputy director told The Observer, a London newspaper: “The whole story kind of unraveled from there. It was quite a surprise. We were not looking for it, so it sort of happened almost by accident.” [or Providence]

Ambrose, a longtime University of New Orleans history professor who penned a series of top-selling histories, was eulogized by NBC news anchorman and officer as “America’s historian.“ With Tom Brokaw, Ambrose helped to cement the exalted status of the World War II generation, and he was the driving spirit behind the National World War II Museum — as well as its siting in New Orleans.

Eisenhower figured centrally in Ambrose’s work. Ambrose wrote seven books about the former president and Allied commander during a quarter-century. They included: “Eisenhower and Berlin, 1945: The Decision to Halt at the Elbe,” (1967); “The Supreme Commander: The War Years of General Dwight D. Eisenhower,” (1970); “General Ike: Abilene to Berlin,” (1973); “Ike’s Spies: Eisenhower and the Espionage Establishment,” (1981); “Eisenhower: Soldier, General of the Army, President-Elect, 1890-1953,” (1983); “Eisenhower: The President,” (1985); “Eisenhower: Soldier and President,” (1990).

Ambrose also edited five volumes of the president’s papers, and several of his other books draw on interviews with Eisenhower.

In The New Yorker story, Rives contradicts Ambrose’s oft-told story that he got a call from Eisenhower in 1964, asking him to write his biography. Instead, Rives told The New Yorker, Ambrose initiated the contact by sending two introduction letters to Eisenhower. The two were eventually introduced by Ambrose’s boss.

Rives’ checks of Ambrose’s footnotes in “The Supreme Commander” also raised the specter that Ambrose made up interviews with the president that didn’t actually occur, The New Yorker reported. The book’s notes cite nine interview dates, but seven of the dates conflict with Eisenhower’s official schedule, which was meticulously recorded.

On some of the dates, Eisenhower’s schedule showed that the president was on the road, on others he was meeting with someone else, at the hospital or on vacation. In Ambrose’s later books, according to The New Yorker, “the specific dates were replaced with vaguer notations, such as ‘Interview with DDE.’”

The New Yorker also quoted Ambrose’s assertions in interviews that he had spent “hundreds and hundreds of hours” interviewing Eisenhower. After scouring the president’s schedule, Rives told The New Yorker that “Eisenhower saw Ambrose only three times, for a total of less than five hours. The two men were never alone together.”

Rives was even more pointed in his comments to The Observer, “I think five hours is a generous estimation of the actual time they spent together. I personally would push it back to less than two or three,” he said.

Stephen Ambrose in July, 2002.

Times-Picayune archive

Ambrose, who lived in Bay St. Louis, died of cancer in 2002 at the age of 66. He was mourned by a who’s-who of prominent Americans at a ceremony in front of the World War II Museum he helped create, including Brokaw and former President George H.W. Bush.

A few months before his death, Ambrose was accused of plagiarizing passages from other historians in several of his books. He acknowledged the mistakes and apologized for them, but attributed the lifted paragraphs to sloppiness rather than dishonesty.

Ambrose’s son, Hugh Ambrose, a writer who was a researcher on his father’s books, did not return phone messages for this story. Neither did historian and former New Orleanian Douglas Brinkley, for whom Ambrose was a mentor.

Katy Reckdahl can be reached at kreckdahl@timespicayune.com or 504.826.3396.

The Horror of D-Day

A New Openness to Discussing Allied War Crimes in WWII

By Klaus Wiegrefe

[source: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,692037,00.html]

Allied forces bringing in troops and equipment at Omaha Beach after it was conquered in bloody fighting on D-Day. At daybreak on June 6, the Americans, British and their allies launched “Operation Overlord,” the biggest amphibious landing of all time.

DDP
05/04/2010

The Horror of D-Day

A New Openness to Discussing Allied War Crimes in WWII

By Klaus Wiegrefe

D-Day may have been the beginning of the end of Germany’s campaign of horror during World War II. But a new book by British historian Antony Beevor makes it clear that the “greatest generation” wasn’t above committing a few war crimes of its own.

It was the first crime William E. Jones had ever committed, which was probably why he could still remember it well so many years later. He and other soldiers in the 4th Infantry Division had captured a small hill. “It was pretty rough,” Jones later wrote, describing the bloody battle.

At some point, the GIs lost all self-control. As Jones wrote: “(The Germans) were baffled and they were crazy. There were quite a few of them still in their foxholes. Then I saw quite a few of them shot right in the foxholes. We didn’t take prisoners and there was nothing to do but kill them, and we did, and I had never shot one like that. Even our lieutenant did and some of the non coms (non-commissioned officers).”The dead will most likely never be identified by name, but one thing is clear: The victims of this war crime were German soldiers killed in Normandy in the summer of 1944.

August 9, 1944. US infantrymen make their way past a wrecked German truck on the way to Avranches during the Allied invasion of Normandy. During the operation, Allied and German troops fought each other in one of the fiercest battles of World War II, first on the beaches and then in the countryside of Normandy.

The Only Good German Is a Dead German

There is no shortage of books on the Battle of Normandy, which also goes by the name of D-Day. And the same can be said about films, such as Steven Spielberg’s award-winning film “Saving Private Ryan,” which was a global success. Indeed, it would almost seem that everything that could be said about the battle has been said.

Still, that didn’t deter British historian and best-selling author Antony Beevor from taking another stab at the material. While conducting research for his newest book, D-Day: The Battle for Normandy, Beevor stumbled upon something that is currently a matter of much debate among experts. If some of these scholars are correct, Allied soldiers committed war crimes in Normandy to a much greater extent than was previously realized.

==========JdN COMMENT

Photo: © John Carey

Beevor (a Norman name) is a leftist author (his website: http://www.antonybeevor.com), but his apparently sincere hatred of atrocities in wartime against both civilians and surrendered soldiers has made him write not only this new book but also the horrifying  Berlin — the Downfall 1945, which detailed the bestial rapes perpetrated by the Soviet army on German women 1944-45 at the direct instigation of the Soviet apiru Ilya Ehrenburg.

A scene from the recent German movie, “A Woman in Berlin”

http://www.reverseshot.com/files/images/issue23/Woman4.jpg

=================

Beevor extensively quotes reports and memoirs of those who took part in the invasion, many of whom state that American, British and Canadian troops killed German POWs and wounded soldiers. They also reportedly used soldiers belonging to the German Wehrmacht or Waffen SS as human shields and forced them to walk through minefields.

For example, one recounts the tale of a private named Smith, who was fighting with the 79th US Infantry Division. Smith allegedly discovered a room full of wounded Germans in a fortification while he was drunk on Calvados, a local apple brandy. According to the official report: “Declaring to all and sundry that the only good German was a dead one, Smith made good Germans out of several of them before he could be stopped.”

US soldiers helping comrades ashore on Utah Beach, June 6. More than 250,000 soldiers and civilians were killed or wounded in the Normandy campaign, and Normandy itself was ravaged.

In another account, Staff Sergeant Lester Zick reportedly encountered an American soldier on a white horse who was herding 11 prisoners in front of him. He called out to Zick and his men and told them that the prisoners were all Poles, except for two Germans. Then, according to Zick, the soldier took out his pistol “and shot both of them in the back of the head. And we just stood there.”

Beevor also quotes John Troy, a soldier with the 8th Infantry Division, who writes of finding the body of an American officer the Germans had tied up and killed because he had been caught carrying a captured German P-38 pistol. Troy describes his reaction in the following way: “When I saw that, I said no souvenirs for me. But, of course, we did it too when we caught (Germans) with American cigarettes on them, or American wristwatches they had on their arms.”

Rage and Violence

The issue of war crimes is an incredibly sensitive one. But, in this case, the evidence is overwhelming.

Given the high number of casualties they suffered, Allied paratroopers were particularly determined to exact bloody revenge. Near one village, Audouville-la-Hubert, they massacred 30 captured Wehrmacht soldiers in a single killing spree.On the beaches, soldiers in an engineering brigade had to protect German prisoners from enraged paratroopers from the 101st Airborne Division, who shouted: “Turn those prisoners over to us. Turn them over to us. We know what to do to them.”

When the same LSTs (landing ship tanks) were used to evacuate both German POWs and Allied wounded, the wounded attacked the Germans, and it was only through the intervention of a pharmacist’s mate that nothing more serious happened.

June 1944: German prisoners being marched through Cherbourg, after the liberation of the town. British historian Antony Beevor’s newest book, “D-Day: The Battle for Normandy,” addresses a subject that is currently a matter of much debate among experts. Some scholars say Allied soldiers committed war crimes in Normandy to a much greater extent than was previously realized. Beevor extensively quotes reports and memoirs of those who took part in the invasion, many of whom state that American, British and Canadian troops killed German POWs and wounded soldiers.

Part 2: A New Approach to Writing History

Beevor frequently quotes from personal memoirs of Allied soldiers that have been available to historians for years. But could it be that they were ignored by them until now because they didn’t support the image of the “greatest generation,” the term that Americans have liked to use to describe their victorious soldiers from 1945? It would seem that no shadows were to be cast on the war that gave the Americans, in particular, the moral right to have a say in shaping Europe’s postwar future as well as creating the practical conditions for it to do so.

Still, that approach has recently been revised. In his 2007 book “The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1934-1944” Pulitzer Prize-winning author Rick Atkinson described various war crimes committed by the Allies. And now we have the same thing with Normandy.

Beevor primarily attributes the Allied crimes to the epic ferocity of the battles. The Germans themselves called it a “dirty bush war,” a reference to the bushes and hedgerows, ranging in height between one and three meters (three and ten feet), used to demarcate the fields in Normandy’s bocage landscape.

Indeed, Normandy’s terrain is ideally suited for ambushes and booby traps. For example, German units stretched thin steel cables across roads at head level, so that when an American Jeep came roaring down the road, its driver and passengers would be decapitated.

[JdN: What an idiotic accusation! If you attach the cable too low, the grill of the jeep will snap it and if you attach it too high, the jeep and passengers pass underneath it! War IS about killing. And it was the Allies that in 1939 declared war on Germany, and not vice versa.]

They also attached hand grenades to the dog tags of dead GIs, so that anyone who tried to remove the dog tags was blown up. Likewise, it is an established fact that German soldiers, and particularly those in the Waffen SS, shot prisoners.

July 1944: German prisoners from Cherbourg behind a barbed wire fence somewhere in England.

Allied Behavior Doesn’t Forgive Germany ‘s

The artillery fire from both sides and the Allied bombing attacks transformed Normandy into a moonscape. Beevor writes about soldiers who huddled in the craters screaming and weeping, while others walked around as if in a trance picking flowers in the midst of explosions. Indeed, American physicians reported 30,000 cases of combat neurosis among their troops alone.

In a letter to his family in Minnesota, a US infantryman wrote that he had never hated anything quite as much, adding: “And it’s not because of some blustery speech of a brass hat.”

But such “blustery speeches” did exist.

According to the findings of German historian Peter Lieb, many Canadian and American units were given orders on D-Day to take no prisoners.

If true, that might help explain the mystery of how only 66 of the 130 Germans the Americans took prisoner on Omaha Beach made it to collecting points for the captured on the beach.

It is also conspicuous that the Allies rarely captured members of the Waffen SS. Was it because the members of this organization — with its Totenkopf (death’s head) insignia — had sworn allegiance to Hitler until death and often fought to the last man? Or did the Allied propaganda about the SS have its desired effect on soldiers? “Many of them probably deserved to be shot in any case and know it,” a British XXX Corps report bluntly stated. [sic]

===========JdN NOW HERE COMES THE “BUT LOOK WHAT THE NAZIS DID TO DESERVE THIS” GARBAGE==========

Of course, for German apologists, this new information shouldn’t be something to make them feel better about their own side’s behavior. In fact, although the extent of Allied war crimes may have been greater than previously known, it cannot be compared with the scope of German crimes against civilians. For example, shooting innocent hostages was part of the German strategy for fighting the French partisans who struck out after D-Day. Up to 16,000 French citizens — men, women and children — fell victim to the terror of the Wehrmacht and the SS.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

=============and it ain”t over yet

US troops executing prisoners in Afghanistan, journalist says

Cliven Bundy, supporters rally before Nevada lawmakers


The journalist who helped break the story that detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq were being tortured by their US jailers told an audience at a journalism conference last month that American soldiers are now executing prisoners in Afghanistan.
New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh also revealed that the Bush Administration had developed advanced plans for a military strike on Iran.

At the Global Investigative Journalism Conference in Geneva, Hersh criticized President Barack Obama, and alleged that US forces are engaged in “battlefield executions.”

“I’ll tell you right now, one of the great tragedies of my country is that Mr. Obama is looking the other way, because equally horrible things are happening to prisoners, to those we capture in Afghanistan,” Hersh said. “They’re being executed on the battlefield. It’s unbelievable stuff going on there that doesn’t necessarily get reported. Things don’t change.
“What they’ve done in the field now is, they tell the troops, you have to make a determination within a day or two or so whether or not the prisoners you have, the detainees, are Taliban,” Hersh added. “You must extract whatever tactical intelligence you can get, as opposed to strategic, long-range intelligence, immediately. And if you cannot conclude they’re Taliban, you must turn them free.
“What it means is, and I’ve been told this anecdotally by five or six different people, battlefield executions are taking place,” he continued. “Well, if they can’t prove they’re Taliban, bam. If we don’t do it ourselves, we turn them over to the nearby Afghan troops and by the time we walk three feet the bullets are flying. And that’s going on now.”
The video of Hersh was uploaded to Michael Moore’s YouTube account Tuesday.
Hersh has a long history as an investigative journalist and worked for many years at The New York Times. In 1969, he broke the story of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam.
This video is from YouTube, broadcast May 11, 2010.
May 12, 2010

* * *

My comment:

First, Seymour Hersh is one of that tiny percentage of brave and courageous juze who tell the truth.

Second, it is PITIFUL that he still believes Obama is some sort of sincere liberal who is “looking away.” No, Obama is a decades-long CIA agent himself, a Manchurian candidate, and is doing exactly as he is ordered to do. He approves of murder, torture and bailouts for the obscenely rich. When I see Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs get 150 years in prison, then I will believe that Obama means “change.”

As for prisoner executions…….I had interrogator training in the U.S. Marine Corps 1977-79 (as a member and NCO in the 35th Interrogator-Translator Team, Anacostia Naval Air Station, Washington DC), and I can therefore say that on every account this is wrong, wrong, horribly wrong practice.

It is morally wrong to murder a prisoner who has surrendered to you in good faith.

It is legally wrong; it violates the Geneva Convention on treatment of prisoners that America rightfully SIGNED!

It is militarily wrong — because you WANT the enemy to surrender to you and not fight to the death! If he knows you are going to betray his trust, torture and then kill him, why should he surrender?

Why not believe the enemy propaganda that all Americans are treacherous bastards? Why not fight to the last bullet and kill as many Americans as possibly as you go down?

This is not America — this is Talmudic juish Pentagon-33rd-degree Masonic, Illuminatus contempt for the dignity of other human beings.

And whatever the racial or cultural differences among humans, we are all God’s children.

This is terrible karma for our nation.

Thoma Jefferson:

“I shudder when I recall that God is just.”

One reason why Obongo does not dare do another false-flag attack inside America like 9/11 is that if a civil war erupted and a resistance movement here, about three quarters of the planet HATES the US government (as much as most true Americans now do), and I can think of six countries with muscle that would LOVE to see the Washington terror regime go down in flames. US forces would be attacked from without if its government attacked its own citizens from within and fought back.

Just as in 1776……………….  powerful foreigners aided the American Revolution.

===========MORE PHOTOS OF THE BEAUTIFUL LOST ARYANS OF ASIA

A great white Aryan civilization once spread from the Atlantic coast all the way to China and everywhere in between.

Over the years most of these people have been destroyed of blended out of existence, however in a few isolated pockets – they still remain to this day.

The pagan Kalash tribe of the Chitral district of North Pakistan.

These people (4000 left) are being pushed up the last valley by Taliban and Afghani Refugees – these people still remain Pagan despite being in a sea of Islam for a very long time, they still have sex/fertility festivals.

They are called Kaffirs or Non Believers by the surrounding Muslims and their women are highly sought after and often kidnapped – unlike the surrounding Muslims the Kalash are forbidden by the Pakistani government to own firearms.

We must cherish all our folk, and save all that are worthy and willing to be saved.We do not wish to become some isolated microscopic minority of blue-eyes up on some mountaintop while juze, negreos and chinese destroy the world we built.

A shot of me in 2008 at an unusual outside church pulpit in downtown Pittsburgh with a young comrade from Missouri (r) and a local Slavic-American Pittsburgher (l).

1 Comment

  1. Hail comrade,
    The invasion of Normandy was simply an invasion of the Continent, of what is now the Eurozone — Churchill always opposed the alliance between France and Germany even after the war, thus such a bloody war to see France and Germany, or rather the whole Continent in the EEC was a real pain in the neck for the Drunkard.
    The invasion of Normandy is just what was done in Irak and Afghanistan by the anglo-powers driven by the Jewish Zionist hatred of the antisemitic Nazism and later of the antisemitic Muslim countries.

    I took this from the internet:
    Even the hallowed D-Day invasion is not untainted. About 3,000 French civilians died on D-Day – about the same number as American soldiers killed in the invasion. All told, hundreds of tons of Allied bombs were dropped during the “liberation” of Normandy, destroying fields and livestock, obliterating towns and villages, and killing 20,000 civilians.
    The conduct of American forces during the war, and in some cases after the war, was sometimes shameful. After the D-Day invasion, some members of the “greatest generation” engaged in drunkenness, carousing, vandalism, petty thefts, looting, seizing property as trophies, robbery, trafficking in stolen military goods, wasting scarce food and drink, billeting themselves in private homes, sexual assault, rape, and gang rape of women of all ages, and mistreating, assaulting, and otherwise abusing their power over those they liberated in France, Belgium, and Germany. Venereal disease and prostitution were rampant, as you can imagine. None of this matters, of course, because we were fighting Hitler.
    But after we were done fighting Hitler, American soldiers participated in the forced repatriation of hundreds of thousands of Russian POWs to the Soviet Union, where many were killed or sent to the gulag, and the mistreatment and neglect of German POWs.

    Churchill the smoking drunkard.
    I got the following from: http://www.welcomearmenia.com/main.php?lang=eng&page=armeniainformation&sid=19
    it was in 1945 when a special 50 degree cognac “Dvin” was produced in Armenia for the Yalta Conference. Sir Winston Churchill asked J. Stalin for a batch of cognac. With a thoughtful look, Stalin answered: “The Soviet Union has full supply of Armenian cognac, so it may as well be sold”. Since then the periodic delivery of “Dvin” to the British Prime Minister had been controlled by the “Father of Nations” personally. In his written requests for subsequent batches Churchill persistently called the cognac by Shustov’s name, while the Russian side patiently corrected: “former Shustov’s cognac”. The legal delivery to England continued until the beginning of the cold war. Afterwards, the Russians refused to supply Churchill with that dainty. However, Churchill’s passion for cognac turned out to be stronger than his political ambitions. Only God knows how he continued receiving his favorite drink. And when aged Churchill was asked about the secret of his longevity, he answered without hesitation: “Never be late for dinner, smoke Hawaiian cigars and drink Armenian cognac!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*