Cover of the 1928 book, which came out four and a half years after his death
Alfred Rosenberg — Dietrich Eckart, a Legacy
Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin, slightly renamed later on to be less offensive to Bible believers as Bolshevism from its Beginnings to Lenin, was listed as the TOP item on a list of major national-socialist writings at the back of this 1928 Alfred Rosenberg book on Eckart. It was published by the official NSDAP publishing house, the Franz Eher Verlag, which was run by Corporal Adolf Hitler’s old platoon sergeant in WWI, Max Amann.
It is a brilliant first exposition in writing of the Jewish problem by Adolf Hitler, then aged 34, and by his mentor and very close friend, Dietrich Eckart, who was then 56, and thus twenty-two years older.
And, significantly, it laid out how negatively the two men saw both the Old Testament and Judaism and also the influence of the so-called Apostle Paul on the New Testament and what is now understood to be Christian doctrine, all this in stark contrast with their sincere reverence, both in public and in private, for the person of Jesus Christ.
The two men identify in the work as Catholics, which they both technically were.
The Catholic church in Neumarkt, where Dietrich Eckart grew up
But this identification with Roman Catholicism was more for political reasons, given that they were growing a new political movement in very Catholic Bavaria.
Beyond that, they certainly did support the original values of Jesus of Galilee as they understood them, as a courageous man who sought to radically change Judaism into a religion of peace and love.
In the opinion of Hitler,Eckart and myself as well, Jesus promoted a truly new faith for the common Jewish people, one opposed to the love of money, to materialism, to vengeance and the hatred of Gentiles. He definitely told a Canaanite women he was not sent by God to the Gentiles, the non-Jews, but instead “to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 15: 21-28)
To do this, He realized, he would have to overthrow the wicked religious leaders of the Jewish people such as the Pharisees, who later wrote the wicked, anti-Gentile Talmud.
Jesus drives the moneychangers out of the Temple.
John 8:44 “You are from your father, THE DEVIL!”
Now, Adolf Hitler did not wish to divide Germans along religious lines, but rather unite his country politically, culturally, economically, and racially, and so he and Dietrich Eckart kept their true, personal views about religion, God, Jesus, the soul and the afterlife, which were different from standard Catholicism, fairly quiet.
In reality, in private, Adolf Hitler believed discreetly and quietly in reincarnation, like the great American automaker Henry Ford, like the Greek philosopher Plato, and like the ancient Kelts, Vikings and the Aryans of ancient India. The Eastern religions we Westerners associate with reincarnation, Hinduism and Buddhism, were both founded by white people who invaded India called Aryans. In fact, the caste system they set up over the conquered, dark-skinned Indians was called “varna,” which means skin color, with whites at the top as rulers and priests. Reincarnation is a profoundly white doctrine.
The Buddha is depicted all across Asia as he was, a white Aryan prince with blue eyes.
Henry Ford said:
In the reincarnation view of the world, there is a time for everyone, even the greatest or most famous, to just go and die so they can see a powerful life-review video after death, honestly face their own flaws and failures as well as good points, and reincarnate afterward, hopefully, as a better person.
Adolf Hitler, like other great Aryan men and women, believed that we are immortal souls that live many lives in different bodies, times and families, and all this is designed so we can learn the lessons of life.
On the immortality of the soul versus the Jewish view, Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, the second volume of which he wrote in 1925 here in this cabin on the Obersalzberg:
“Due to his own original, special nature, the Jew cannot possess a true religious institution, if for no other reason because he lacks idealism in any form, and hence belief in a hereafter is absolutely foreign to him.
And a religion in the Aryan sense cannot be imagined which lacks the conviction of survival after death in some form.
Indeed, his Talmud is not a book to prepare a man for the hereafter, but only for a practical and profitable life in this world.”
Second, Hitler fiercely opposed atheism as BAD for society and the masses:
“We were convinced that the people needs and requires this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out.” Adolf Hitler, in a speech in Berlin on 24 Oct. 1933
Third, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion) advocate atheism for the goyim:
“Eliminate religion; replace it with science and materialism.”
Now you may not like the Bible or the Christianity of the churches, but God is not limited to those Near Eastern definitions.
All our Aryan ancestors believed in God or gods, whether Greeks, Romans, Kelts, Vikings or the Aryans of old India. That is an undeniable fact, and we see to this day the beautiful temples our pagan/heathen forefathers built.
Were they all contemptible, superstitious fools?
Hitler literally would have had any national socialist arrested for publishing writings saying God was just “the Jew in the sky.” Hitler would have had them thrown in a concentration camp too for spreading such atheistic pamphlets or books. And that is exactly what the Gestapo did in 1933 with all so-called “freethinking” clubs and organizations.
Heinrich Himmler, head of the German police
The hard truth is that you cannot praise Hitler or national socialism and be an atheist.
AH spoke very briefly about reincarnation, and is recorded as having said, in light conversation, in the book Table Talk at Führer Headquarters by Luftwaffe Colonel Henry Picker, spoken on the 23rd of September, 1941, in the evening:
“The elements of which our body is made belong to the cycle of nature; and as for our soul, it’s possible that it might return to limbo, until it gets an opportunity to REINCARNATE itself.”
Hitler only said “it is possible” because it was during a light conversation, not a church setting, and he was not about to preach a sermon like a priest, minister, guru or sect leader to his crusty Wehrmacht generals and their wives who were present and everyone was just relaxing. After all, his goal was always to 1) maintain his authority,and 2) unite the Germans and never divide them, so he just put the thought about reincarnation out there and simply left it at that.
Eva Braun at the Berghof
But Hitler’s chief philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer, based all his ideas on reincarnation, and Hitler read Schopenhauer in the trenches when off-duty in WWI. Death was, of course, a relevant daily issue for Corporal Adolf Hitler during his four years of wartime service, where he earned two Iron Crosses for bravery.
Corporal Hitler (x) and Company Sergeant Amann, with his right shoulder turned toward the camera, and to the left of the company dog, Foxi
Fournes-en-Weppe, near Lille, France; Hitler spent half of WWI at the front lines near here.
Amann in the Weimar period with Hitler
As an SS officer
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion advocate strongly that the goyeem be made atheistic, and believe there is no God and no soul. Then they will fear to die, because if they do not have a soul, at the death of their body, they fear they will be dead forever.
MOST average people, to be honest, would prefer to live a long life as a slave, and not a short life as a hero. Unless there is a military draft to make them fight, and a firing squad to prevent them from deserting 😉 , many men would simply refuse to make the supreme sacrifice, and RUN rather than lay their life down for 1) the safety and future of their women and children, and 2) the survival of their race and nation.
Atheism = the myth that no God is watching over me, or grading me, or judging what is in my heart, or caring about my life and dreams — and I am just a miserable, two-legged animal, a biochemical thing, that soon will be dead forever.
Top of the ad: “National socialist literature”, then the Bolshevism booklet by Hitler and Eckart
Eckart is significant for two things:
1) His role shows Adolf Hitler’s willingness to be mentored and to learn from a man 20 years older, one who knew about show business, the theater world, and thus about performing in public, how to get crowds going, enthuse and move them emotionally;
2) His private role in forming Hitler’s view of what a truly Aryan religion would be like. However, Hitler felt it unwise to publicly talk about religion himself; he did not want religious arguments; he said he was for “positive Christian values,” that “Jesus fought the Jews,” who hated Him in return and murdered Him, and he let it go at that.
What Hitler did do was allow the editor Alfred Rosenberg and the publisher Max Amann to just go ahead and publish Eckart’s writings without him ever openly “endorsing” them.
Dietrich Eckart’s plays really should be translated into English and performed. The play “Family Men” really moved me, I admired the mix of comedy and tragedy, and the ending was unforgettable …. Men who must work hard to feed their families, who have no savings due to deliberately low salaries, and thus can never afford to quit or dare to speak out and thus risk being fired…. men who are, in effect, on a money leash, like a dog to his owner.
In terms of world history, Dietrich Eckart deserves credit for transforming Adolf Hitler, a quiet, shy, watercolor artist, bookworm and amateur poet into the great Führer and world leader that he later became! Of course, these abilities already were slumbering in Hitler, but it was Dietrich Eckart who brought them out in him, praised and encouraged him so he would go out and achieve his incredible destiny.
Eckart had one constant theme in his writings — how we as souls pendulate between two very real worlds, two very real dimensions:
—the material, this earth, atoms, wood, stone, water, air, insects, plants, animals and humans, stars and galaxies, and
–the spiritual, the higher world and dimension whence we come to be born here as babies.
We are souls who come here to experience things; we are beings “from the other side.”
BUT we come into this physical dimension needing both feet firmly on the ground of material reality, and we must be practical to succeed in all manner of necessary tasks: from paying bills to raising kids and caring for our parents when aged.
Eckart accuses the Jews, however, of being only worldly, only carnal, only fleshly, and only material, and thus solely after the money, sex and power — and always, always after the one thing that is the sweetest reward of all, revenge on their foes.
Dietrich Eckart was very influenced by the great French aristocratic writer, Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux (1805-76), who believed, drumroll, that the Jews, this extraordinary people who have no rivals on this planet in terms of cunning and malevolence, were literally the product of, yes, demonic entities mating thousands of years ago with earthly women.
As Wikipedia says:
Henri-Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux (1805 – 1876) was a French writer and journalist. He was the author of Le Juif, le judaïsme et la judaïsation des peuples chrétiens (The Jew, Judaism and the Judaization of Christian peoples, 1869). The work is said to have received the approval of Pope Pius IX. It was later translated into German (ca. 1920) by Alfred Rosenberg.
Eckart, who worked very closely in Munich with both Alfred Rosenberg and Adolf Hitler, undoubtedly read Rosenberg’s translation of this work into German.
Eckart says that Jews basically have no soul at all, that they are mere instruments without conscience of a demonic power.
This would dovetail with my own views of the Jews as being a race of veritable psychopaths, a breed of born, innate criminals who live mainly to lie, to steal, to cheat, to betray, to torture, to rape and to murder the innocent.
It is my further view that Jews descend largely from the prehistoric neanderthals, a hyper-violent, hyper-clannish and very woman-oppressing kind of early humans.
These neanderthals then became the semites of the Middle East, and from that race there came a subrace of roaming, escaped criminals, exiles and utter rabble, hordes of sociopaths living together who were receivers of stolen goods, prostitutes, pimps, hitmen, archers for hire, and mercenaries, In the Middle East they were known to the Egyptian and Hittite authorities as “the Habiru” and who were they?
Simply the Hebrews. And some Jewish authors themselves admit this.
These Habiru, this horde of nomadic thieves, were selected to be the chosen people of Yahweh, a demonic prince, an alien being, because they were criminals by nature and perfect for his goal of taking this planet over for his species.
Joseph Farrell, who has a PhD from Oxford University in England, has expounded on this, though to avoid persecution, he manages to never once use the word “Jew” to say so. 😉
And thus, when the Jews lie, it is because they have no conscience at all which even can be bothered.
They do not believe there is any higher world, any Truth with a capital T, any objective Reality — just whatever story may work for them, whatever virtual reality they can tell the gullible and “spin” to the naive. Thus they resort to complete lies, to partial truths or even to occasional embarrassing major truths which are admitted solely and entirely to garner credibility in the listener so that,m down the road, a truly important lie can be circulated later on, be believed and be acted on, such as getting one group of goyim to wage war on another, such as the English and Americans crushing their German brothers in two wars.
Yes, even telling a whole truth for a jew is useful as a means to an end. Creating trust and credibility is needed so the Big Lie that is being prepared for launch into the minds of the goyim will be believed.
This explains the prestige press, with all its deliberately dry, boring and seemingly factual style which characterizes the New York Times, the Washington Post, the London Times, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in Germany, Le Monde in France, etc.
Their whole strategy is to be credible and accurate on the little facts — names, dates, places, interviews with some Harvard expert — so you will also believe the Big Lie which is the whole purpose of the paper, namely:
–that we need a one-world government,
–we need a police state to protect us from terrorists,
–we must mix all the races together to end racial conflict,
–and we must listen to and protect the wise, ancient, and gifted people, the Jews, who only want a world of peace and brotherhood.
It is clear to me that Dietrich Eckart — an artist who realized the necessity of entering politics in order to obtain power — was the decisive influence on Hitler in his transformation from the introvert to the extrovert, from the poet, thinker and painter into the dynamic, spectacular politician, the writer, the fascinating speaker, and then the head of state of a major nation, and, in the end, of a legendary superpower, the Third Reich.
It was Eckart who enriched Hitler’s understanding of higher realities and got him to believe in himself and to obey his calling.
And his destiny, back in that life he had between 1889 and 1945 was to be politics.
But politics is, and has ever been, a very dirty business.
Because 1) it is the worst psychopaths in society who tend to gravitate into the world of politics — egomaniacs, men and women greedy for money, sex, fame and power — and they are precisely the sort that is ruthlessly willing and even happy to do and say anything to get them….lie, steal, defame, betray and murder by starting unnecessary wars or rubbing out their political rivals.
The young Tony Blair
2) the basic nature of the masses, of the people in general, of the voters, of the public.
The average Joe or Jill, regardless of their education level, is neither a devil nor an angel. Now Winston Churchill was anything but a hero to me, and in fact was a war criminal, but he was brilliant, and he said many trenchant things. One of them was this:
The sad truth is the average fellow is often willfully ignorant, fairly selfish and not interested in unpleasant truths, especially if they call for painful changes to be made and comforting illusions abandoned. And then no proof or evidence can shake that desire to reject and deny a glaring reality.
The public actually wants to be flattered and to be told just how right and smart they are, because the majority, as reincarnation would say, are “young souls,” souls that have recently arisen and come up from the animal stage.
So “democracy,” or in Ancient Greek demos-kratia, meaning “average-people rule,” must end up as mediocre at best, and as the rule of criminals over cowards at worst, because the average person is no angel — and certainly no hero either. “To get along, go along,” as the legendary Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Sam Rayburn, once said.
And so the very great German poet Friedrich Schiller, who wrote “William Tell,” said, “votes should be weighed, not counted.”
For Adolf Hitler, the practical politician living under the Weimar parliamentary democracy, the trick would be to get both the right-wing conservative nationalists and the left-wing working-class socialists, who had been bitterly opposed for generations to each other, to unite under him though the two groups had been raised for generations to despise, to hate and to viciously fight each other.
Hitler’s goal was to create something never seen before, a “national kind of socialism,” something that was both of the right and of the left, with a red flag symbolizing the left-wing workers that was combined with the right-wing colors of red, black and white, which were the colors of Prussia and its kings, aristocrats and various generals “von” this and “von” that. 😉
The Prussian flag
General Paul von Hindenburg
Dietrich Eckart wrote this about politics in his essay Männer (“Men”), reflecting on the common German proverb “Politik verdirbt den Charakter” (“Men”), meaning rather bluntly “politics ruins a man’s character,”
“It is not politics that ruins character, but [general human] character that ruin politics. It is something unclean around the whole world….. The man who is rich inside resists political activity — as did Bismar
ck [who as the Iron Chancellor of Prussia 1862-90 unified and led Germany] for his whole life — as if he sensed that its first and greatest danger to him was not something lurking to destroy his enjoyment of life but something threatening the progress of his soul.”
So Eckart and Hitler both loved the people — but also saw that tough love — without any delusions about the masses — was the one and only position to take way if you want to really help and uplift them.
And now to the work by Dietrich Eckart and Adolf Hitler……
…….”Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin”
MOSES (by Michelangelo)
(Victor Ulyanov) “LENIN”
A Dialogue Between Adolf Hitler and Me
By Dietrich Eckart
Translated from the German by William L. Pierce
Editor’s Forward [slightly adapted by me, John de Nugent, who worked for Dr. Pierce and his National Alliance in 1981-84]
EDITOR’S FOREWORD: The following material has been translated from a pamphlet found in the NSDAP Hauptarchiv. Its German title was Der Bolschewismus von Moses bis Lenin: Zwiegespräch zwischen Adolf Hitler und mir, and it was originally published in Munich in March 1924 from unfinished notes on which Dietrich Eckart had been working in the autumn of 1923.
Dietrich Eckart was born on March 23, 1868, in the Bavarian town of Neumarkt, which means “New Market” and is located about twenty miles southeast of Nurnberg.
Birth house of Dietrich Eckart
Interior of the “Mary the Helper” votive church in Neumarkt in a classic Bavarian, rococo style
Aerial view of Neumarkt
Plaque and mural in Neumarkt honoring Eckart in 1933, after Hitler came to power; it highlights him as, among other things, the originator of the slogan “Deutschland, Erwache!” (“Germany, awaken!”); notice how few people had cars then, with the Wall Street-triggered Great Depression still severely affecting Germany
Adolf Hitler, hatless, and his entourage, stand in icy rain in 1933, ten years after Eckart’s passing, to salute his memory at the end of a ceremony inaugurating the Dietrich Eckart Memorial in the city park in Neumarkt, which was also renamed as Neumarkt/Dietrich-Eckart-Stadt [ = “City”]
This monument still exists today, though leftist Antifa spray-paint it to desecrate it.
Even though it was idiotically renamed as the “King Christopher Monument” (for some Danish king that also was born in Neumarkt), the antifa, hysterically afraid of a resurgence of national socialism, still have desecrated it.
In 1936, in preparation for the Berlin Olympics, this open-air theater in a Berlin park was created, and was called “The Dietrich Eckart Open-Air Stage at the Reich Sports Field”
It is now called simply the Waldbühne, the Woods Stage, and is used for open-air concerts.
Dietrich Eckart died on December 26, 1923, the day after Christmas, in beautiful Berchtesgaden.
[Eckart] was a poet, a playwright, a journalist, scholar, and a philosopher, as well as a dedicated fighter for the National Socialist cause. Among his better-known works are his play “Lorenzaccio” and his translation and adaptation for the German stage of [the great Norwegian playwright Henrik] Ibsen’s “Peer Gynt.”
He was for a while the editor of [the main NSDAP newspaper, the] Völkischer Beobachter, which means the “Racial-Folkish Observer.”.
And he wrote the NSDAP song, with the famous words and title “Deutschland erwache,” [ = “Germany, awaken”], which later became a NSDAP byword and was featured on all their standards they marched with.
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RHS-8v97Uk The lyrics by Eckart in German (above in the video) and English (below) begin at 0:42.
1. Deutschland erwache aus deinem bösen Traum!
Gib fremden Juden in deinem Reich nicht Raum!
|: Wir wollen kämpfen für dein Auferstehn!
Arisches Blut soll nicht untergehn! 😐
2. All diese Heuchler, wir werfen sie hinaus,
Juda entweiche aus unserm deutschen Haus!
|: Ist erst die Scholle gesäubert und rein,
Werden wir einig und glücklich sein! 😐
3. Wir sind die Kämpfer der N.S.D.A.P.:
Treudeutsch im Herzen, im Kampfe fest und zäh.
|: Dem Hakenkreuze ergeben sind wir.
Heil unserm Führer, Heil Hitler dir! 😐
1. Germans awaken! Rouse from your restless dreams!
Traitors have lulled thee with foul and wretched schemes!
We want to fight for a new, brighter day!
Aryan blood shall not pass away!
2. All these deceivers, we throw them to the curb!
Our German nation, they’ll nevermore disturb!
Then when the soil is blameless and free,
Happy as one, will we ever be!
3. We are the soldiers – to fight that is our creed!
True German warriors in struggle and in deed!
Pledged to our banner, devoted are we!
Hail to our Fuhrer! We hail to thee!
Eckart also was likely the first person to ever refer to Adolf Hitler, in December 1921, as “der Führer” (“the Leader”).
The reader interested in more details of Eckart’s life, as well as a fairly extensive sampling of his poetry, is referred to Alfred Rosenberg’s book [in German], Dietrich Eckart: Ein
Vermdchtnis (Munich, 1928 ff)
Der Bolschewismus is of interest to Americans today for three reasons. First, it is the last earthly work of the man who, as the intimate companion of Adolf Hitler during those critical, early years in Munich, helped prepare the spiritual foundations of National Socialism. Eckart had been seriously ill as he was writing the pamphlet, and his arrest and temporary imprisonment, as a consequence of the Munich putsch of November 9, 1923, were followed shortly by his death.
Second, it is instructive, as being representative of a certain category of propaganda.
Eckart was a practical propagandist as well as an idealist and a poet, and Der Bolschewismus is an excellent example of his style. Aimed at the reader with the equivalent of a high-school education, it is skillfully contrived to avoid tediousness and maintain a relatively unsophisticated audience’s interest while making a rather extensive, if not intensive, historical investigation of the Jewish question. It achieves this by relegating the great majority of documentary evidence to footnotes and by liberally interspersing historically significant points with spicy or amusing tidbits.
Third, it is of considerable interest, even today, for its own sake. Although the last forty years have unfortunately provided us with considerably more experience of Jewish-Bolshevist activities, Eckart did quite well with the materials available to him in 1923. Of particular interest is his use of the Old Testament, as a history of the Jews, to throw light onto more recent Jewish activities.
When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…’ You must destroy all the peoples the LORD your God gives over to you. Do not look on them with pity….–Deuteronomy 7:1-6 and 16
‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly…’–Leviticus 25:44-46
“Foreigners will rebuild your walls, and their kings will serve you…Your gates will always stand open, day and night, so that the Gentiles may bring you the wealth of their nations and their kings led in triumphal procession, for the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will perish; it will be utterly destroyed.”–Isaiah 60:10-12
Eckart’s notes for Der Bolschewismus were still in rather rough and unfinished form when he died, and this will be evident at a few places in the text which follows. The editor has slightly condensed the original material during his translation, omitting several of the more ragged portions and such things as untranslatable puns, as well as a few sections which have limited interest for present-day readers. Additional footnotes have been added by the editor in a few places, and these are so designated.
Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin
A Dialogue Between Adolf Hitler and Me
“Yes!” he cried. “We’ve been on the wrong track! Consider how an astronomer would handle a similar situation. Suppose that he has been carefully observing the motion of a certain group of celestial bodies over a long period of time. Examining his records, he suddenly notices something amiss: ‘Damn it!’ he says. ‘Something’s wrong here. Normally, these bodies would have to be situated differently relative to one another; not this way. So there must be a hidden force somewhere which is responsible for the deviation. And, using his observations, he performs lengthy calculations and accurately computes the location of a planet which no eye has yet seen, but which is there all the same, as he has just proved.
But what does the historian do, on the other hand? He explains an anomaly of the same type solely in terms of the conspicuous statesmen of the time. It never occurs to him that there might have been a hidden force which caused a certain turn of events. But it was there, nevertheless; it has been there since the beginning of history. You know what that force is: the Jew.”
“Yes, certainly,” I replied, “but to prove it, to prove it! For the last fifty or hundred years, so far as I’m concerned, it’s been obvious; indeed, a good deal further back, perhaps even in pre-Christian times…”
“My dear fellow,” he replied to me, “we can read in Strabo (1) that already in his time, shortly after the birth of Christ, there was hardly a place to be found on the whole earth which was not then dominated by the Jews; dominated, he writes, not merely inhabited.
(1) Strabo (Greek geographer and historian, ca. 63 B.C. — ca. 24 A.D.), Geographica.
Already decades earlier, Cicero (2) — at that time a great and powerful man, my friend! — suddenly lost his nerve when, in his well-known defense plea in the Capitol, he was obliged to point out the great influence and the cohesiveness of the Jews:
‘Softly, softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many another gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.’
(2) Marcus Tullius Cicero, Oratio pro L. Flacco. In 59 B.C. Cicero defended the proconsul Flaccus, who, at the urging of Jews, was accused of corruption in connection with his administrative activity in Syria.
Similarly, the influence of the Jews with Augustus was so great that they completely intimidated Pontius Pilate, who, as deputy of the Roman Emperor, was certainly not a nobody. Thus he said, ‘For God’s sake, away with this sordid Jewish affair!’ as he reached for the washbasin and condemned Christ, whom he considered guiltless, to death. (3) (3) John 19:12.
Considering these things, my friend, every child knows — or rather, could know — how late the hour already was at that time. ”
A reach for the Old Testament, a brief flipping of pages,
…and — “There,” he cried, “the recipe from which the Jews always brew their hellish broth! We anti-Semites are really something. We manage to find out everything except that which is really important.”
Word for word, he emphatically read with a hard voice:
“And I will set the Egyptians against the Egyptians: and they shall fight every one against his brother and every one against his neighbor; city against city and kingdom against kingdom. And the spirit of Egypt shall fall in the midst thereof; and I will destroy the counsel thereof: and they shall seek to the idols, and to the charmers, and to them that have familiar spirits, and to the wizards. (4) (4) Isaiah 19:2-3.
“Yes indeed,” he laughed bitterly, “now the people will seek to Dr. Cuno, and Dr. Schweyer, and Dr. Heim, (5) and whatever other charmers and wizards they have.
(5) Three figures prominent in German politics in 1923: the German Chancellor, the Bavarian Minister of the Interior, and the founder and leader of the Bavarian People’s Party, respectively. [Translator]
When asked why Germany has become a pigsty, these gentlemen will answer reproachfully,
‘You yourselves are to blame. You have no more good breeding, no faith, only selfishness and conceit. Now you will try to put the blame on the Jews. It’s always been like that when you have needed a scapegoat. Then everyone has jumped on the Jews and persecuted them unmercifully. And just because they had the money, and because they were defenseless. Is it any wonder that a few individual Jews are behaving in a reprehensible manner now? After all, one finds some black sheep in every group. As if there weren’t a good number of decent Jews! Look at their piety, their sense of family responsibility, their sober way of life, their readiness to make sacrifices, and, above all, their ability to stick together! And you? At one another like dogs and cats: sheer insanity!’
Thus will the charmers and wizards prattle on and on, till one night the blood sign will appear on all the Jewish houses, and the infuriated masses, led by the Jews, will swarm forth to smite all the firstborn in the land again as in Egypt. ” (6) (6) Exodus 12:7-13,29-30.
“Remember how it was here in Munich during the communist takeover?” I interjected. “The houses of the Jews certainly weren’t marked with blood, but there must have been a secret arrangement, because among all those who suffered the misfortune of a house search not one was a Jew. As a matter of fact, one of the stupid Red troopers who had me by the hair answered my sarcastic question by explaining that it was forbidden to search the Jewish houses.
“And in 1871, in Paris, the Jewish defense also ran according to plan. There the communists destroyed whatever they could, but the many places and houses of the Rothschilds remained completely intact. (7) (7) James K. Hosmer, The Jews (New York, 1885), p. 272. [Translator]
All this enables us to understand the place in Exodus according to which ‘a mixed multitude’ also left Egypt with the Jews.”
“In Egypt the scoundrels’ scheme succeed only about halfway,” he finished. “The Egyptians became masters of the situation at the last moment and sent the ‘mixed multitude’ to the devil, together with the Jews.
*** My remark
Many of the Egyptians in the middle and upper class were whites, with red or blond hair and blue eyes.
There must have been a desperate struggle. The slaughter of the firstborn reveals that clearly enough. Just as they have done with us, the Jews had won the great lower stratum of the population for themselves — ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!’ —
until one night they sent out the order, ‘Down with the bourgeois! Kill them, the dogs!’ but things didn’t turn out so well as they had expected. That portion of the Egyptian nation that had remained patriotic turned the tables and booted Moses, Cohn, and Levi out of the country, followed by the inhabitants whom they had incited. During this exodus they carried along as much stolen booty as they could manage, the Bible reports with satisfaction. It also reports, in no uncertain terms, that the Egyptians were glad to be rid of them. (8) (8) Exodus 12:35-36; Psalms 105:38
The best, though, was the reward the Jews gave their stupid accomplices. Suddenly they began calling them ‘rabble,’ (9) whereas formerly they had called them ‘comrade’ and pretended to love them. Imagine the faces these deluded ones must have made in the desert when they heard this.”
“The murder of seventy-five thousand Persians, in the Book of Esther, no doubt had the same Bolshevist background,” I answered. “The Jews certainly didn’t accomplish that all by themselves.”
“No more,” he confirmed, “than the dreadful bloodbath over half the Roman Empire, which took place during the reign of Emperor Trajan [marble bust photo]. Hundreds of thousands of non-Jewish nobles in Babylonia, in Cyrenaica, in Egypt, and on Cyprus butchered like cattle, most of them after the most abominable torture! (10)
(10) In volume two, chapter 16 (page 384 of the 1783 London edition) of his History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Edward Gibbon reports:
“From the reign of Nero to that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives…. In Cyrene they massacred 220,000 Greeks; in Cyprus, 240,000, in Egypt, a very great multitude. Many of these unhappy victims were sawed asunder, according to a precedent to which David had given the sanction of his example.
The victorious Jews devoured the flesh, licked up the blood, and twisted the entrails like a girdle round their bodies.” [Translator]
And today the Jews still rejoice over that. ‘If only the various centers of rebellion had cooperated,’ triumphs the Jew, Heinrich Graetz, ‘then perhaps they would have already been able to give the Roman colossus its death blow at that time.’ ” (11) (11) Heinrich Graetz, Geschichte der Juden von den Altesten Zeiten [ = “History of the Jews from the Most Ancient Times”] (Breslau, 1853).
“The Jews call our Sedan Day (12) celebration barbarous,” I remarked. (12) On September 2. Sedan was the site of the great Prussian victory in the Franco-Prussian war, on this day in 1870. [Translator]
“But they find entirely in order the fact that, year in and year out, they still, after all this enormous time, celebrate in the synagogues their heroic deed concerning the seventy-five thousand Persians, in the feast of Purim. ”
“None of this evidence seems to make any impression on us, however,” he said dryly. “One would think us deaf and blind.
“Before the first clash with the Egyptians, the head scoundrel, the modest Joseph, had pretty well prepared: the seven lean cows, all the granaries filled, the people raging with hunger, the reigning Pharaoh a perfect flunky of the Jews, and Joseph, with a corner on the grain supply, ‘ruler over all the land’! (13)
All the lamentations of the Egyptians were in vain; the Jew held the warehouse closed with an iron fist until they, in return for a bit of bread, were obliged to give away first their money, then their cattle and their land, and finally their freedom.
And suddenly the capital was swarming with Jews; old Jacob was there, and ‘his sons, and his sons’ sons with him, his daughters, and his sons’ daughters, and all his seed’ — the entire hodgepodge. (14) (14) Genesis 46:7.
And Joseph ‘wept a good while’ for joy. Afterward, he said to his brothers: ‘ye shall eat the fat of the land,’ and ‘the good of all the land of Egypt is yours.’ (15)
“But some time after this glorious Egyptian citizen of the Jewish faith, one hundred and ten years old, had died, the old Pharaoh also passed away and was succeeded by another Pharaoh, who ‘knew not Joseph,’ and, seeing the multitude of Jews, who meanwhile had grown very powerful, he became quite frightened. He feared lest:
‘when there falleth out any war, they join also unto our enemies’; (16) Exodus 1:6-10.
Thus he was smarter than Wilhelm II, (17) who hoped for their support.
(17) Emperor William II of Germany, who abdicated in 1918 after the Marxist-Jewish revolution in Germany led to the crumbling of her war effort and the loss of World War I. [Translator]
“Before God and history my conscience is clear. I never wanted the war.”
The Jews must work, he decided. In all seriousness, work. ‘Unmerciful,’ wailed the Jewish chronicler. No wonder that they breathed vengeance. After all, what did one have the Pobelvolk [ = rabble] for, if not to do the work?
“By now, the Egyptians had forgotten dear Joseph, who was dead and gone but there was no lack of others on whom to blame the state of affairs, namely the landowners, the industrialists, the bourgeois. According to the Jews, no one else was responsible. ‘Proletarians of all countries, unite!’ And the masses believed it and turned on their own flesh and blood for the sake of the ‘chosen people,’ who had brought on all their distress in the first place.
But to us [that is, to modern Western Christian kids in Sunday School] they touchingly read aloud the beautiful story of Joseph and his brothers. No doubt many teachers ‘wept a good while.’
It’s enough to drive one to despair. ”
He paused with a dark look at the Book of Hate.
“And so it goes, through the entire Old Testament,” he began again. “Indeed, I’m telling you nothing new, but we must bring it home to ourselves as often as possible in order to be able to negate the constant hypocritical babble. Really, the Book of Joshua should suffice; such a spectacle of uninterrupted genocide, of bestial cruelty, of shameless rapacity and cold-blooded cunning — Hell incarnate! And everything in the name of Jehovah, in fact, according to his express wish!
When the city of Jericho fell victim to the Jews through the treachery of the harlot Rahab, neither man nor beast, neither young nor old remained among the living; only the harlot was spared. She and her whole, noble family were rewarded with the privilege of living in Israel. (18) (18) Joshua 6:25.
And what good-natured peoples they were who, one after another, were completely exterminated! Delitzsch, who has thoroughly investigated that period, writes, for example, about the Canaanites:
“On all the hills, under every shady tree, they rendered adoration and reverence to the sun god and to the salutary goddess Aschera; and he compares this beautiful, poetic custom with the pious way of our Catholic villagers, serving the Almighty in remote mountain chapels.”
Chapel in Tyrol, Austria
(19) (19) Friedrich Delitzsch, Die Grosse Täuschung: Kritische Betrachtungen zu den alttestamentlichen Berichten üiber Israels Eindringen in Kanaan, Die Gottesoffenbarung vom Sinai, und die Wirksamkeit der Propheten [ = “The Great Deception: Critical Reflections on the Old Testament Reports on Israel’s Invasion of Canaan, The Divine Revelation from Sinai, and the Effectiveness of the Prophets” (Stuttgart, 1920).
“Joshua alone,” I emphasized, “was responsible for the massacre of thirty-one kings, with all their people. Among those nations exterminated in these predatory raids were several who had yielded themselves trustingly to him. Each time the sinister words, ‘let none survive,’ were heard. I am inclined to believe that the Pöbelvolk or at least their descendants, must have still been the obedient shock troops of the Jews, not because the work was so atrocious, but because the children of Israel have always let deluded Gentiles do their dirty work, particularly where danger was involved.
Besides, they would not have been strong enough to subdue the peoples to whom they were opposed, without the bellicose enthusiasm of their brutalized comrades.
“Of particular interest is the evident satisfaction with which the Jews have deliberately enumerated each of the slain kings.
One is reminded of the prophet Isaiah. In one place, he raves as if possessed:
‘The Lord is angry at all the Gentiles; he will deliver them to the slaughter; their land will became burning pitch; it will become a wasteland, soaked with their blood; there will be no nobles in the land; their princes will die out.’ (20) (20) Isaiah 34.
Between Isaiah and Joshua were hundreds of years, but in that whole time the infernal rage of the Jews against non-Jewish royalty hadn’t changed a bit.”
“And in all eternity nothing will ever change,” he proceeded, “so far as the attitude of the Jews toward our kings and our leaders is concerned. They have to go, and when they can’t accomplish this by force, then they use cunning.
But whenever we have strong leadership, the Jews are obliged to keep their noses clean.
Our leadership can be truly strong, however, only if it is based completely in our people; only if it concerns itself with the welfare of the least among them just as much as with that of the wealthiest of them; only if, in the firm conviction of its own worth, it bars every alien influence from the beginning; only if it is not merely national, but is also social, down to its very bones.
No matter what others may say, I assert this: a time will come when all the elite nations of the world will have such a leadership; and then everyone will be astonished to see that, instead of grating on one another as has previously been the case, they will treat one another with respect and consideration.
For then there will be no more whipping up of land greed, of an itching for power, of suspicion — sentiments which exist in unmixed form only in the isolated few, and not in the more trusting general populace, anyhow. There will be an end to the lying praise of an indiscriminate human brotherhood, which would be possible, if at all, only under the supposition that one had from the first excluded that eternal mischief-maker, the Jew.
But had this been done, there would be no need to push the universal brotherhood idea; the various peoples would find themselves compatible of their own accord.”