…..while at a local tavern for “Fish Friday,” I experienced a “chance encounter” and a startling message

I

And now on to my Margi story from last night…. and my missing hat in the midst of a lethal blizzard…..

Many UP people buy the “Stormy Kromer” brand of heavy, woolen fall-and-winter caps, made up here in Ironwood, Michigan. They are a bit like certain German military or gendarmerie (rural police) caps. (https://www.emedals.com/europe/germany/german-headgear/wwii-headgear/an-austrian-m43-style-gendarmerie-cap-by-litto-mutze-of-vienna). They have a heavy woollen double rim around the back that can be pulled down to protect the ears and back of the neck from the cold.

1943 Third Reich Gendarmerie cap

Suddenly I realized I had to get to an appointment, and ran out of the house (actually trudged rapidly through foot-high snow), thinking my Stormy Kromer cap had been left in the car.

No, it was not…. which turned out to be an important little error.

After my appointment, I went to a local tavern which serves delicious baked or fried cod, flounder and other fish — and only on Fridays.

I had to do some things online, using my smartphone, so I actually sat down alone at a table, with my coat and gloves not visible, placed low on a chair seat and minus my usual hat….

Anyway, my move from the table to the bar led to a startling encounter because of who pulled up a barstool next to me.  I had seen a couple walking along main street (“River Road”) in the deep snow, the husband carrying ski poles for stability in the gusting wind.

So this handsome couple sits down next to me, hailing from Minneapolis, five hours away by car, but living now in Ontonagon. We talked about the dry snow there versus the wet snow here.

Random House, where the then little-known psychiatrist first tried to publish his original manuscript, turned him down, saying the final section was “too Christ-y.”

Thereafter, Simon & Schuster published the work for $7,500 and printed a modest hardback run of 5,000 copies. The book took off only after Peck hit the lecture circuit and personally sought reviews in key publications. Later reprinted in paperback in 1980, The Road first made best-seller lists in 1984 – six years after its initial publication.[6]

People of the Lie
.
First published in 1983, People of the Lie: Toward a Psychology of Evil [subsequent vols subtitled The Hope For Healing Human Evil and Possession and Group Evil] (ISBN 0 7126 1857 0) followed on from Peck’s first book.

Peck describes the stories of several people who came to him whom he found particularly resistant to any form of help. He came to think of them as eviland goes on to describe the characteristics of evil in psychological terms, proposing that it could become a psychiatric diagnosis. Peck points to narcissism as a type of evil in this context.

Theories

Love

His perspective on love (in The Road Less Traveled) is that love is not a feeling, it is an activity and an investment. He defines love as,

“The will to extend one’s self for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s spiritual growth”

(Peck, 1978/1992,[7] p85).

Peck expands on the work of Thomas Aquinas over 700 years ago, that love is primarily actions towards nurturing the spiritual growth of another.

Peck seeks to differentiate between love and cathexis. Cathexis is what explains sexual attraction, the instinct for cuddling pets and pinching babies’ cheeks.

However, cathexis is not love. All the same, love cannot begin in isolation; a certain amount of cathexis is necessary to get sufficiently close to be able to love.

Once through the cathexis stage, the work of love begins. It is not a feeling. It consists of what you do for another person. As Peck says in The Road Less Traveled, “Love is as love does.” It is about giving yourself and the other person what they need to grow.

***

Discipline

The Road Less Traveled begins with the statement “Life is difficult”.[7]: 13

Life was never meant to be easy and is essentially a series of problems which can either be solved or ignored.

Peck wrote of the importance of discipline, describing four aspects of it:

— Delaying gratification: Sacrificing present comfort for future gains.
— Acceptance of responsibility: Accepting responsibility for one’s own decisions.
— Dedication to truth: Honesty, both in word and deed.
— Balancing: Handling conflicting requirements.

Peck argues that these are techniques of suffering, that enable the pain of problems to be worked through and systematically solved, producing growth. He argues that most people avoid the pain of dealing with their problems and suggests that it is through facing the pain of problem-solving that life becomes more meaningful.

Neurotic and legitimate suffering

Peck believes that it is only through suffering and agonizing using the four aspects of discipline (delaying gratification, acceptance of responsibility, dedication to truth, and balancing) that we can resolve the many puzzles and conflicts that we face.[7]

This is what he calls undertaking legitimate suffering.

Peck argues that by trying to avoid legitimate suffering, people actually ultimately end up suffering more.

This extra unnecessary suffering is what Scott Peck terms neurotic suffering. He references Carl Jung

‘Neurosis is always a substitute for legitimate suffering’.[10]

Peck says that our aim must be to eliminate neurotic suffering and to work through our legitimate suffering to achieve our individual goals.[7]

Evil

Peck discusses evil in his three-volume book People of the Lie,[11] as well as in a chapter of The Road Less Traveled.[7]

Peck characterizes evil as a malignant type of self-righteousness in which there is an active rather than passive refusal to tolerate imperfection (sin) and its consequent guilt.[7][8]

This syndrome results in a projection of evil onto selected specific innocent victims (often children), which is the paradoxical mechanism by which the People of the Lie commit their evil.[8]

Peck argues that these people are the most difficult of all to deal with, and extremely hard to identify.[8] He describes in some detail several individual cases involving his patients. In one case which Peck considers as the most typical because of its subtlety, he describes Roger, a depressed teenage son of respected, well-off parents.[8] In a series of parental decisions justified by often subtle distortions of the truth, they exhibit a consistent disregard for their son’s feelings, and a consistent willingness to destroy his growth. With false rationality and normality, they aggressively refuse to consider that they are in any way responsible for his resultant depression, eventually suggesting his condition must be incurable and genetic.

Peck makes a distinction between those who are on their way to becoming evil and those who have already crossed the line and are irretrievably evil. In the first instance, he describes George. Peck says, “Basically, George, you’re a kind of a coward. Whenever the going gets a little bit rough, you sell out.”[8]

Of note, this is the kind of evil that inspired the film “Session 9.” When asked where evil lives, Simon concludes, “I live in the weak and the wounded.”[12][circular reference] On the other hand, those who have crossed the line and are irretrievably evil are described as having malignant narcissism.

Some of Peck’s conclusions about the psychiatric condition that he designates as “evil” are derived from his close study of one patient he names Charlene.[8] Although Charlene is not dangerous, she is ultimately unable to have empathy for others in any way. According to Peck, people like her see others as playthings or tools to be manipulated for their own uses or entertainment. Peck states that these people are rarely seen by psychiatrists, and have never been treated successfully.

Evil is described by Peck as “militant ignorance”.

The original Judeo-Christian concept of “sin” is as a process that leads us to “miss the mark” and fall short of perfection.[8]

Peck argues that while most people are conscious of this, at least on some level, those who are evil actively and militantly refuse this consciousness. Peck considers those he calls evil to be attempting to escape and hide from their own conscience (through self-deception), and views this as being quite distinct from the apparent absence of conscience evident in sociopathy.[8]

According to Peck, an evil person:[7][8]

— is consistently self-deceiving, with the intent of avoiding guilt and maintaining a self-image of perfection
— deceives others as a consequence of their own self-deception
— projects his or her evils and sins onto very specific targets (scapegoats) while being apparently normal with everyone else
— commonly hates with the pretense of love, for the purposes of self-deception as much as deception of others
— abuses political (emotional) power (“the imposition of one’s will upon others by overt or covert coercion” (Peck, 1978/1992, p298[7]))
— maintains a high level of respectability, and lies incessantly to do so
— is consistent in his or her sins. Evil persons are characterized not so much by the magnitude of their sins, but by their consistency (of destructiveness)
–is unable to think from the viewpoint of their victim (scapegoating)
— has a covert intolerance to criticism and other forms of narcissistic injury

Most evil people realize the evil deep within themselves, but are unable to tolerate the pain of introspection, or admit to themselves that they are evil.

Thus, they constantly run away from their evil by putting themselves in a position of moral superiority and putting the focus of evil on others. Evil is an extreme form of what Peck, in The Road Less Traveled, calls a character and personality disorder.[7][8]

Using the My Lai massacre [when American soldiers massacred 500 Vietnamese villagers] as a case study, Peck also examines group evil, discussing how human group morality is strikingly less than individual morality.[8] Partly, he considers this to be a result of specialization, which allows people to avoid individual responsibility and pass the buck, resulting in a reduction of group conscience.

Though the topic of evil has historically been the domain of religion,[8] Peck makes great efforts to keep much of his discussion on a scientific basis, explaining the specific psychological mechanisms by which evil operates. He was also particularly conscious of the danger of a psychology of evil being misused for personal or political ends.[8]

[] Ultimately, Peck says that evil arises out of free choice. He describes it thus: Every person stands at a crossroads, with one path leading to God, and the other path leading to the devil. The path of God is the right path, and accepting this path is akin to submission to a higher power. However, if a person wants to convince himself and others that he has free choice, he would rather take a path which cannot be attributed to its being the right path. Thus, he chooses the path of evil.

Peck also discussed the question of the devil.[8] Initially he believed, as with “99% of psychiatrists and the majority of clergy” (Peck, 1983/1988,[8] p182), that the devil did not exist; but, after starting to believe in the reality of human evil, he then began to contemplate the reality of spiritual evil.

Eventually, after having been referred several possible cases of possession and being involved in two exorcisms, he was converted to a belief in the existence of Satan.

Peck considered people who are possessed as being victims of evil, but of not being evil themselves. Peck, however, considered possession to be rare, and human evil common. He did believe there was some relationship between Satan and human evil, but was unsure of its exact nature. Peck’s writings and views on possession and exorcism are to some extent influenced and based on specific accounts by Malachi Martin; however, the veracity of these accounts and Peck’s own diagnostic approach to possession have both since been questioned by a Catholic priest who is a professor of theology.[13]

It has been argued that it is not possible to find formal records to establish the veracity of Father Malachi Martin’s described cases of possession, as all exorcism files are sealed by the Archdiocese of New York, where all but one of the cases took place.[14]

The four stages of spiritual development

Peck postulates that there are four stages of human spiritual development:[15][16]

— Stage I is chaotic, disordered, and reckless. Very young children are in Stage I. They may defy and disobey and are unwilling to accept a will greater than their own. They are egoistical and lack empathy for others. Criminals are often people who have never grown out of Stage I.

— Stage II is the stage at which a person has blind faith in authority figures and sees the world as divided simply into good and evil, right and wrong, us and them.

Once children learn to obey their parents and other authority figures (often out of fear or shame), they reach Stage II. Many religious people are Stage II. With blind faith comes humility and a willingness to obey and serve. The majority of conventionally moralistic, law-abiding citizens never move out of Stage II.

— Stage III is the stage of scientific skepticism and questioning. A Stage III person does not accept claims based on faith, but is only convinced with logic. Many people working in scientific and technological research are in Stage III. Often they reject the existence of spiritual or supernatural forces, since these are difficult to measure or prove scientifically. Those who do retain their spiritual beliefs move away from the simple, official doctrines of fundamentalism.

— Stage IV is the stage at which an individual enjoys the mystery and beauty of nature and existence.

While retaining skepticism, s/he starts perceiving grand patterns in nature and develops a deeper understanding of good and evil, forgiveness and mercy, compassion and love. His/her religiousness and spirituality differ from that of a Stage II person, in the sense that s/he does not accept things through blind faith or out of fear, but from genuine belief. S/he does not judge people harshly or seek to inflict punishment on them for their transgressions. This is the stage of loving others as yourself, losing your attachment to your ego, and forgiving your enemies. Stage IV people are labeled mystics.

Peck argues that while transitions from Stage I to Stage II are sharp, transitions from Stage III to Stage IV are gradual. Nonetheless, these changes are noticeable and mark a significant difference in the personality of the individual.

Community building

In his book The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace[15], Peck says that community has three essential ingredients:

Inclusivity
Commitment
Consensus
Based on his experience with community building workshops, Peck says that community building typically goes through four stages:

— Pseudocommunity: In the first stage, well-intentioned people try to demonstrate their ability to be friendly and sociable, but they do not really delve beneath the surface of each other’s ideas or emotions. They use obvious generalities and mutually established stereotypes in speech. Instead of conflict resolution, pseudocommunity involves conflict avoidance, which maintains the appearance or facade of true community.

It also serves only to maintain positive emotions, instead of creating a safe space for honesty and love through bad emotions as well. While they still remain in this phase, members will never really obtain evolution or change, as individuals or as a bunch.

— Chaos: The first step towards real positivity is, paradoxically, a period of negativity. Once the mutually sustained facade of bonhomie is shed, negative emotions flood through: members start to vent their mutual frustrations, annoyances, and differences. It is a chaotic stage, but Peck describes it as a “beautiful chaos” because it is a sign of healthy growth (this relates closely to Dabrowski’s concept of disintegration).

— Emptiness: To transcend the stage of “Chaos”, members are forced to shed that which prevents real communication. Biases and prejudices, need for power and control, self-superiority, and other similar motives which are only mechanisms of self-validation and/or ego-protection, must yield to empathy, openness to vulnerability, attention, and trust.

Hence, this stage does not mean people should be “empty” of thoughts, desires, ideas or opinions. Rather, it refers to emptiness of all mental and emotional distortions which reduce one’s ability to really share, listen to, and build on those thoughts, ideas, etc.

It is often the hardest step in the four-level process, as it necessitates the release of patterns which people develop over time in a subconscious attempt to maintain self-worth and positive emotion. While this is therefore a stage of “Fana (Sufism)” in a certain sense, it should be viewed not merely as a “death”, but as a rebirth—of one’s true self at the individual level, and at the social level of the genuine and True community.

— True community: Having worked through emptiness, the people in the community enter a place of complete empathy with one another. There is a great level of tacit understanding. People are able to relate to each other’s feelings. Discussions, even when heated, never get sour, and motives are not questioned. A deeper and more sustainable level of happiness obtains between the members, which does not have to be forced. Even, and perhaps especially, when conflicts arise, it is understood that they are part of positive change.

[]

Characteristics of true community
Peck describes what he considers to be the most salient characteristics of a true community:[15]

Inclusivity, commitment, and consensus: members accept and embrace each other, celebrating their individuality and transcending their differences. They commit themselves to the effort and the people involved. They make decisions and reconcile their differences through consensus.

A spirit: The true spirit of community is the spirit of peace, love, wisdom and power. Members may view the source of this spirit as an outgrowth of the collective self or as the manifestation of a Higher Will.

.

.

.

Jesus’ jewish enemies conspired for years to somehow “get” Him. They understood that Jesus, while using jewish terms and references with His jewish audience, was actually preaching a radically new religion which was the opposite of Judaism.

This exchange was on VK:

Bobby Ross(see his photo)
Jebus was a made-up fabrication by Jews . Give me a historical link please to any document besides a religious one that shows any proof of his existence

1

John De Nugent Aufdeutsch

Bobby, and you “know” this how? Were you alive 2,000 years ago? The same thing — no public documents — could be said of the Buddha, or Zoroaster. Or Odin, LOL! Have you any public documents or birth certificate proving the existence of your precious Odin?

Since they were not rulers, there are no structures, carved edicts, temples or pillars from their own time.
.
And why would the Jews promote a dire enemy(John 8:44!!!!!!) who hated them and they Him?
.
Why does the Talmud, which spews hate on him, and was started around AD 100 by the grandsons of the Jews who had Jesus crucified, admit He was real and His miracles were real?
.
Finally, why did Adolf Hitler believe He was real?

Are you smarter or greater than he was?

I am so curious why the Jews would invent and promote a man who said this about them.

Bobby Ross
You are a dip shit of monumental proportions

1

John De Nugent Aufdeutsch

Bobby, thanks. Are you done? Is this your entire counter-argument — that I am a “dip shit”? 😉

If the whole white race ends up looking and acting like you, with the same spirit of hate toward our own comrades, maybe it is already Game Over, eh? 😉

Running his pic again –look at the expression on his face. Looks like a guy who hates everyone….

……Why did the pagan Constantine embrace Christianity?

Brilliant French author Laurent Guyénot of the Sorbonne says the Roman emperor Constantine the Great, a pagan, and a very ruthless man, too, saw promoting Christianity, a fundamentally antisemitic religion, as a useful way to stop the Jews from taking the Roman Empire over by money-lending.

The fact is that, as Constantine recognized, Christianity is, or was then, a world religion of immense emotional power. 

Anyone who prefers being eaten by a lion to renouncing a Man whom they never met is experiencing very deep feelings of love, gratitude and loyalty, the same exact emotions that Adolf Hitler also triggered.

And Constantine [photo], practical man and general that he was, grasped that the Christian masses understood that their Savior, their beloved, charismatic leader, was an innocent, peaceful, kind and loving man.

He was a saint whom the Jews, in unimaginable wickedness, had viciously set up, framed, slandered, and had murdered.  They forced the highly reluctant Roman governor Pontius Pilate to execute him “or else,” which is exactly the kind of machinations they do to anyone who opposes them.

I could write a book about the set-ups – the entire Holappa episode – the sabotage (esp. of my 1990 race for Congress in Tennessee), the slanders — defaming me as a pedophile, Jew, homo, con man, fake marine, wife-beater, dog torturer, etc. — and the death threats I myself have suffered from 1990 to today……

AS I WROTE IN 1925, ANY DAY YOU ARE NOT SLANDERED BY THE JEWS, YOU FELL DOWN ON THE JOB. 🙂

Their biggest slander:

…..Jesus, the rueful Nordic

A CRECHE AT THE HOPE LODGE OF THE MAYO CLINIC, WHERE MARGI AND I STAYED WHILE SHE WAS FIGHTING HER CANCER….

After receiving some sweet Yuletide greetings from a Married Italian woman and mother who might be the reincarnation of Savitri Devi, and is now my fervent supporter, I wrote her:

***

I thank you, belatedly, and hope that you and the family had a beautiful time together.

The coming Aryan religion will show the true Jesus — an incarnated Nordic who tried to reform the Jews and make them peaceful, because they are a gigantic menace to us all of the white race.

Some of the Nordics long before this era had played gods — “shining ones” — dyaus — in Indo-European because of their blond hair, sky-blue eyes, and silvery UFOs, and this word was related to the word for “day:” The day is when the sun is visible and shining. Pokorny Etymon: 1. dei-, dei̯ə-, dī-, di̯ā- ‘to shine, glitter; day, sun; god, deity’ Semantic Field(s): to Shine, Glisten, Day, Sun, God

Those renegade Nordics, misusing their vast technological powers over terrestrial humans, acted like tyrants. They also fought each other. They raped terrestrial females. Three goddesses argued in their vanity over who was the most beautiful — triggering the terrible, pointless Trojan War.

These shining ones were immortal only because they continually ate “ambrosia” and drank “nectar,” extending their lives. So they were not intrinsically immortal at all.

Blond Apollo [photo] skinned Marsyas, a poor satyr, alive because he had challenged the god to a music contest!

A Scythian slave (from what is now Ukraine), aghast (notice the expression), sharpens a knife for Apollo so he can flay the pitiful Marsyas.

The story of the god Prometheus is also horrifying. Zeus punished this Titan (Titans were another gang of gods that had lost a power struggle to Zeus and his Olympian gods) for wanting to educate and uplift humanity by chaining him to a boulder.

Zeus decided to punish once and for all Prometheus, who had run afoul of the chief of the Gods. He had Prometheus chained onto a rock on Mount Caucasus for eternity, and put him to relentless torture by having a vicious eagle feed on his liver. The liver would grow up again at night, so that the eagle could happily eat it again the next day.

No wonder the masses wanted better gods to worship than THAT, and especially they wished for a god of love and justice, not a psycho god with a personality like Nero or Caligula!

Many of these Nordics later felt very guilty and ashamed for their selfish, cruel exploitation and tyranny over the humans residing on the surface of this planet.

Returning to Jesus, if His project to radically reform Judaism failed, then He wanted the Jews to commit a crime of legendary and shocking evil against Him, even at the price of His life.

He, the Prince of Peace who spoke of a loving heavenly father and knelt down to wash the feet of His disciples…..

…decided that He actually WANTED the Jews to torture and murder Him (and this actually agrees with Christian orthodoxy, btw) — but not so His death would wipe away OUR sins.

Nothing another man does can erase YOUR sins.

That is silly, “magical thinking.”

It is your karma — you did it. And you must repent (feel genuinely sorry), apologize (in person, in writing or via prayer if the person has passed on), make amends as much as possible, and grow spiritually from facing your flaws and processing YOUR OWN ERROR.

That is adult thinking!

Not baby-Jesus magic.

In the most impactful way possible, Jesus struck with a literal whip at the Jews’ money source and con games.

….Jesus clearly and deliberately provoked the Jew leaders into doing something SO vile that the whole world would be shocked by it.

This would expose the truly horrid nature and unique evil residing in the very heart of this psychopathic horde, this race of genocidal, cruel, perverted, megalomanic, narcissistic and paranoid parasites.

In this passage below, we see Pilate recognizing that Jesus is innocent of any crime; wanting Jesus to speak and defend himself; and seeking to release Him to avoid crucifixion.

But Jesus simply refuses to help Pilate…… because He wants to be murdered — to stir up forever the world’s hatred against Jewry.

He heroically incites the Jews to brand themselves forever as a savage people when they fall into His trap.

Gospel of John, chapter 19, verses 1-22

Jesus Sentenced to Be Crucified

1 Then Pilate took Jesus and had him flogged. 2 The soldiers twisted together a crown of thorns and put it on his head. They clothed him in a purple robe 3 and went up to him again and again, saying, “Hail, king of the Jews!” And they slapped him in the face.

4 Once more Pilate came out and said to the Jews gathered there, “Look, I am bringing him out to you to let you know that I find no basis for a charge against him.”

5 When Jesus came out wearing the crown of thorns and the purple robe, Pilate said to them, “Here is the man!” 6 As soon as the chief priests and their officials saw him, they shouted, “Crucify! Crucify!” But Pilate answered, “You take him and crucify him. As for me, I find no basis for a charge against him.”

7 The Jewish leaders insisted, “We have a law, and according to that law he must die, because he claimed to be the Son of God.” 8 When Pilate heard this, he was even more afraid, 9 and he went back inside the palace.

“Where do you come from?” he asked Jesus, but Jesus gave him no answer.

10 “Do you refuse to speak to me?” Pilate said. “Don’t you realize I have power either to free you or to crucify you?”

11 Jesus answered, “You would have no power over me if it were not given to you from above. Therefore the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin.”

12 From then on, Pilate tried to set Jesus free, but the Jewish leaders kept shouting, “If you let this man go, you are no friend of Caesar. Anyone who claims to be a king opposes Caesar.”

13 When Pilate heard this, he brought Jesus out and sat down on the judge’s seat at a place known as the Stone Pavement (which in Aramaic is Gabbatha). 14 It was the day of Preparation of the Passover; it was about noon. “Here is your king,” Pilate said to the Jews.

15 But they shouted, “Take him away! Take him away! Crucify him!”

“Shall I crucify your king?” Pilate asked. “We have no king but Caesar,” the chief priests answered.

The Crucifixion of Jesus

16 Finally Pilate handed him over to them to be crucified. So the soldiers took charge of Jesus. 17 Carrying his own cross, he went out to the place of the Skull (which in Aramaic is called Golgotha). 18 There they crucified him, and with him two others—one on each side and Jesus in the middle. 19 Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross. It read: “JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS.” 20 Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Aramaic, Latin and Greek. 21 The chief priests of the Jews protested to Pilate, “Do not write ‘The King of the Jews,’ but that this man claimed to be king of the Jews.”

22 Pilate answered, “What I have written, I have written.”

Pilate’s wife had implored him in vain: “I had a dream about Him. Please don’t harm that righteous man!”

***

However, the fake and self-appointed Apostle Paul, an agent of the Sanhedrin, the ruling council of Jewry in Jerusalem, saw that Christianity, a religion preaching that “God is love,” not a tyrant like Zeus, Apollo or the Jews’ own Yahweh, was destined to become a worldwide religion.

So he tried, as much as possible, to rejudaize the new faith which Jesus had established in order to STOP and END the gradual Jewish conquest of the world!

Dietrich Eckart and Adolf Hitler discussed all this in their brilliant 1923 brochure “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin,” how the Jews were never God’s People, but they were, in fact, Satan’s.

John 8:44  in Greek:

“You [jewish leaders] are from the father of the Devil.”

Yahweh!

The demonic jewish god Yahweh

However, 96 years ago, when organized Christianity (Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox) was still very powerful, Adolf Hitler did not want to cross swords with the Christians, and thereby let the Jews divide-and-conquer us anew.

Instead, he focused on whatever brought about German unity, holding his tongue on all controversial religious matters.

United we stand — but divided we fall!

So Hitler did not say all that he knew about religion, tossing out now and then just little tidbits like this one, and even then only to his innermost circle at the Berghof:

.

BUT NOW THAT TIME  FOR A NEW FAITH HAS ARRIVED, the time to not hold back — and the era for Jesus to be honored for His real message. The Galilean was a mysterious man, who was seen while just a boy of 12  in the temple in Jerusalem, baffling with his brilliance the Temple elders…. and triggering their envy.

….and then this Galilean was not seen again until he was 30 –  and showed up atthe Jordan River, asking His cousin, John the Baptist, to baptize him!

So for 18 years out of 32, for 56% of His life, Jesus had disappeared!

Then, like the Greek gods, He appeared, suspending the laws of the material world, transforming water into wine, walking on water, healing the sick, and doing other extraordinary things, not to mention teaching a new god. 😉

Jesus, no pacifist, and not anti-Gentile at all, blesses a Roman centurion and then remote-heals his paralyzed servant.

As he was dying, Jesus prayed to God: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” The centurion who was the foreman during the crucifixion, gasped:

“Truly, this man was a son of God.” 

Why “forgive”? Because Jesus understood what the Buddha, Tolle, and others have grasped: surface earthlings, are caught on a spiritual level between animals and higher beings.

They have not learned what it takes to advance to higher civilization and end the madness — by learning to control (or even how to turn off for more than ten seconds) their own minds.

Their minds, instead, tyrannically control them.

And then they do awful things to each other, and especially to anyone who seeks to truly help them — and raise the real issues.

Surface earthlings do not even know why they drink themselves silly, why they engage in speeding in their cars, or crave sex, or try rock climbing with no safety ropes.

They are out to do things so intense, distracting or numbing that this stops their otherwise “always-on” minds for short intervals from constantly spinning and tormenting them.

……God is the Führer of the Universe

I wrote to a generous, regular donor and former Rockwell man:

What Dr. Eben Alexander wrote is how I see “God.”

Later, I will go into what He is not, namely, some senile old man (like a nursing-home geezer who is grateful if the self-serving young’uns come visit twice a year so as to firm up their inheritance) or some lambikin wuss, as the more liberal Christians imagine.

Basically, God is the Führer of the universe.

He replied:

…..The tyrannic, egoic mind gets lots of people killed

via GIPHY

Christopher Tsombanis John, this strikes a real nerve with me as an OTR [ = over the road] trucker! I dealt with this shit for years! Not to worry though; I’m not “triggered.“ lol

John De Nugent Aufdeutsch Now this is a perfect example of an atheist. “I caused two trucks to wreck, but no cop arrested me, so I got away with it.” WRONG. When you die, you see a life-review video, and awful scenes like this are in it.
.
If you are not really, really appalled, angels assigned to you take note and you will get the specific karmic lesson you need — to be on the receiving end yourself of exactly and precisely what YOU did to others. (The 2001 movie “Defending Your Life” is a semi-comedy about this very serious topic.) “You reap what you sow.”
.
Imagine what Winston Churchill got when he died in 1965….. Think Dresden.

….David Lloyd George: the Christian idea of “heaven” drove me to atheism

[From p. 355 of Reincarnation: the Phoenix Fire Mystery]

In a diary entry of Sept. 3, 1919, Lord Russell recorded these words of his friend, Lloyd George, who was the prime minister of Great Britain 1916-22 (and later became a huge fan of Adolf Hitler and sought reconciliation with Germany):

***

When I was a boy, the thought of Heaven used to frighten me more than the thought of Hell!

I pictured Heaven as a place where there would be perpetual Sundays, with perpetual services, from which there would be no escape, as the Almighty, assisted by cohorts of angels, would always be on the lookout for those who did not attend.

It was a horrible nightmare.

The conventional Heaven, with its angels perpetually singing, etc., nearly drove me mad in my youth, and made me an atheist for ten years.

My opinion is that we shall be reincarnated…and that hereafter we shall suffer or benefit in accordance with what we have done in this world.

For example, the employer who sweats his workpeople will be condemned to be sweated himself….”

…..Did the Jews come up with God versus Satan, heaven and hell, free will, and therefore judgment on your soul?

A nice comrade on VK named Sabrina posted the notion that God, Satan, heaven, hell, free will, etc, is all just semitic fairy tales. I replied:

***

I appreciate your intentions, Sabrina, and antipathy toward Pauline (judeophilic) Christianity, or anything religious (or also political, or cultural) which is Jewish and toxic.
.
However, sorry, some of your well-meaning assertions are ahistorical.
.
“God versus Satan”, judgment at death, and the immortality of the soul, are clear, core teachings that began first with the Aryan religion of Zoroastrianism, NOT Judeo-Christianity.
.
And the ancient Persians (Iranians) were WHITE, as are still about 10% of the Iranians today, especially in the northeast of the modern country today.

In fact, Iran literally means “Aryanland.” Many Iranians, in fact, get a “nose job” in a desire to look more like their pure-Aryan ancestors from before the muslim conquest.

https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/nose-job-iran-p..

A small number of Afghans — especially Nuris — and Pakistanis and northwestern Indians are also still white.)
.
God, the good deity, for Zoroaster, is “Ahura Mazda,” and Satan is “Ahriman.”
.
The later Jews, in exile in the Persian Empire in Babylon (where they had an enormous community), simply stole these Aryan ideas, and thence they passed on into early Christianity.

Heavens, and hells, and free will, AND the Messiah, are other Iranian-Aryan ideas that we only THINK are jewish. They are WHITE ideas, and fundamentally true ideas.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Zarathustra

Btw, here is an impressive Iranian-American White Nationalist: https://jasonrezajorjani.com/

A stalwart NS comrade wrote me (https://johndenugent.com/great-minds-privately-were-convinced-of-reincarnation/#comment-619607):

It’s very hard for me to accept that there is “A” god, “The” God. If it were so, He could snap a finger to make everything right, and grant us the knowledge we need with the same snap of His finger. If this is so, then this must be the ultimate fantasy game that our youth love so much.

I replied:

Okay, I will address this good question.

Pauline Christianity has soured many of us on the whole God idea. It all seems so unreal and a cynical fairy tale….. and, worse, the Baby Jesus tales, and the Lamb of God, and how we are going to sit on thrones up in heaven, and judge the Twelve Tribes of Israel — just infantile.

And, worse, it is all infantilizing.

It is all un-adult, immature, overly yin, that is, overly “female” (estrogen-centered), and simply wishful, escapist thinking. For we know this, surveying millennia of human misery: love does NOT conquer all.

Men, soldiers, warriors and revolutionaries, by killing the wicked, are often the only real answer.

I have run this graphic before, dear comrade, but it really does just about say it all, and so very concisely, too:

But I will respond in detail to this huge question. Why would a loving God not fix the world for His suffering children?

Most searingly, why did He let the utterly bad guys win in 1945?

The deputy mayor of Leipzig, Germany and his wife and daughter ended their lives in May 1945, unwilling to live in a sordid, ignoble, ugly, post-NS world. The poor Germans were about to descend from a relative heaven — the time under Hitler was the only time in recorded history when a whole nation was really happy — to an absolute Jew hell.

Americans, Brits, Irish, Swedes – they never even tasted, never even knew, what heaven on earth could be like, when people REALLY loved one another!

…….comrade remembers two young mothers with little children who died of cancer

She wrote:

I saw two extraordinary mothers die of cancer; both very young.

The first, when she was operated on, immediately realized that she had no chance of making it.

That evening in the hospital she squeezed my hand so tightly, knowing we would never see each other again.

A few months passed and she died.

I never forgot her, and I never stopped giving her my greeting.

So it was with the other mother, mother of two twins too. (She liked how I sang and played!) These were two people who struck me immediately because of their way of seeing me and talking to me.

There are people who see the soul of people even from a distance.

I will never forget them … as if I could!

***

I replied: As I was doing the enormous project of an audiobook and illustrated online version of the 1923 booklet by Adolf Hitler and Dietrich Eckart, “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin,” I saw their total antipathy toward all things Jewish.

But, like the Buddha, they also saw most “gods” as just selfish aliens.

It is hard to know much for certain about Jesus, only that the Jews hate Him and He came to hate them. He gave up all attempts to transform this wicked people. The fundamental problem since Constantine the Great established Christianity as an approved religion and rigidly defined its doctrines is that it proclaims the Jews were, at one time, the chosen people of God. Jesus accepted this premise — think of a Platonic “noble lie” — because he was trying to change the Jews. And this megalomanic notion in their heads flattered them immensely, so He accepted it “for the sake of discussion” in the exact same way that a democratic politicians always praises his voters, activists and donors as being such wonderful people. (“It’s so great to be back in Peioria”…) 😉

But it is true that the Jews are the chosen people — chosen, yes, by the Devil!

And they always were that way! Their deity, Yahweh, was a far more demonic, malevolent god than Apollo, Zeus and Hera ever were!

As the French author Laurent Guyénot proved, Yahweh was originally just the tribal deity of a tiny group of semites in what is now Iraq.

It was only under Persian rule far later on that the Jews stole the Iranian-Aryan idea of “Ahura Mazda”, a just and loving Creator of the Universe (the Aryans in India called him “Brahma”), and applied it like the con men they are to their demonic entity, Yahweh.

.

…..Superb book on Yahwism and Zion

If any religion is an unadulterated ego trip, it is Judaism, or as author Laurent Guyénot puts it, “Yahwism.” Yahweh is an egotistical, jealous, psychopathic and megalomanic god, a “divine sociopath,” who then chooses an equally monstrous tribe to be his people, the criminal Habiru. Then we see them flattering each other for the last three thousand years, and vituperating everyone else, and encouraging each other to commit heinous crimes against all their neighbors.

Laurent Guyénot, graduate of the Sorbonne, the Harvard of France (as is antisemitic author Hervé Ryssen, and as was the late, great Robert Faurisson):

https://johndenugent.com/racial-nostalgia-folly-in-india-as-young-caste-mixing-couple-is-burned-alive-brilliant-new-book-on-yahweh-and-Zion/

I must do the impossible, because otherwise we are doomed.

National socialism must return as a triumphant religion.