Frying pan to fire: when the foster parents molest “rescued” kids; Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (C-PTSD) — what hundreds of thousands of Americans have from MK-ULTRA

Spread the love

I know from talking with many adults that this kind of horrific story is 100% true.

…..Robert Sepher on MK-ULTRA and Hollywood

(This is the second version of this video; the first attacked the JEWS openly and was deleted by JewTube.)

 

……Complex post-traumatic stress disorder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_post-traumatic_stress_disorder

Complex post-traumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD; also known as complex trauma disorder)[1] is a psychological disorder that can develop in response to prolonged, repeated experience of interpersonal trauma in a context in which the individual has little or no chance of escape.[2] C-PTSD relates to the trauma model of mental disorders and is associated with chronic sexual, psychological and physical abuse and neglect, chronic intimate partner violence, victims of kidnapping and hostage situations, indentured servants, victims of slavery and human trafficking, sweatshop workers, prisoners of war, concentration camp survivors and defectors of cults or cult-like organizations, narcissistic child abuse.[3] Situations involving captivity/entrapment (a situation lacking a viable escape route for the victim or a perception of such) can lead to C-PTSD-like symptoms, which can include prolonged feelings of terror, worthlessness, helplessness, and deformation of one’s identity and sense of self.[4] C-PTSD has also been referred to as DESNOS or Disorders of Extreme Stress Not Otherwise Specified.[5]

***

This is exactly what MK-ULTRAs experience. Regular PTSD is what happens after ONE traumatic incident, such as what affected these famous people: https://www.inspiremalibu.com/blog/dual-diagnosis/7-well-known-people-with-post-traumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd/ 

Poor Jackie Kennedy — seeing her husband’s head blown off was a lasting shock for her.

Jackie knew in her bones that LBJ was behind it, so she wore her blood-spattered dress to his swearing-in, saying: “I want them to see what they’ve done.”

Of course, she likely had no idea whatsoever that the Texas-talking, Texas-acting Johnson was a Jew via his mother, and that her husband, President Kennedy, had been blocking Israel from getting the Atomic Bomb as part of his huge project, heightened by the very, VERY dangerous 1961 Cuban Missile Crisis (my dad was called up for that as a Marine Corps major), to avoid a thermonuclear WWIII.

And Kennedy was a secret antisemite and admirer of Adolf Hitler.

https://johndenugent.com/?s=kennedy+

I have been corresponding with a German lady who has all the symptoms of CPTSD, and I told her this:

 

And I wrote her that, going well beyond all “therapy” and the psych-meds which spiritually unenlightened experts in this fallen world might give her, she should read these books and deeply get into them:

 

Once the egoic mind is shed, and I am living proof, no hellish experiences of the past can affect you any longer.

AND the hellish experiences which the white race will and must undergo for having rejected Adolf Hitler will be much more bearable. We will not “crack up” or freak out, no matter what horrors we see or things we will be forced to do in extremis so our race and nations survive.

I am creating a therapeutic new religion that will not fill your head with myths, but provide practical help for the pain of life in today’s sickening, disgusting, awful and getting-worse-by-the-day jew world. I have not had a single nightmare since 2003, 16 years now, after decades of insomnia and horrible dreams. If I can do it, so can you.

AND I THANK THE GODS THAT — thanks to MK-ULTRA — MY HATRED FOR THE CHILD-RAPING, CHILD-KILLING JEWISH BILLIONAIRE PEDOPHILOCRACY IS UNLIMITED. NOTHING CAN INTIMIDATE OR BLOCK ME FROM MY MISSION. Death? I died to any semblance of happiness a hundred times already in MK-ULTRA as a child. There are tons of things, believe you me, that are far worse than death. Like falling alive into the hands of the Jews.

……Recent donations

–10 September 2019 $50 via PayPal to mhuffstickler@outlook.com from P in New England

–6 September 2019 check from G in Cicero, Illinois

–5 September 2019 $20 Australian, and a very nice card

–30 August 2019 $75 check from G in Cicero, Illinois

–30 August 2019 supportive letter and 20 Euros from C in Germany

–21 August 2019 book by Joseph Goebbels (the last one he wrote — in 1945, a brilliant collection of short essays given to the frontline troops called  “The Law of War”) and 20 euros from C in Germany

–20 August 2019 five Australian silver dollars and a kind greeting to me and Margi from M in Ohio

 

–19 August 2019 $20 cash from P in Florida

–16 August 2019 check for $75

LOL, photo with donation reveals my “Hitlerian” forehead

–14 August 2019 $150 from J in New Hamshah 😉 (New England pronunciation of “New Hampshire”)

–9 August 2019 Check for US$75 from J in Nevada und 50 Euro in cash with a card from A in Germany

Translation from German:

Dear John de Nugent,

Belated heartfelt greetings and all the best for your [65th] birthday!

And also for Margi my wishes for further improvement!

Enclosed are 50 euros as thanks for your great work in the service of historical truth. — A

I published this in German (Engl. transl. follows)

Zum netten Lob der Kameradin, die mir seit Jahren hilfreiche Spenden schickt, kann ich nur sagen, mit Pontius Pilatus: “Was ist Wahrheit?!” Sie ist wertlos, wenn die Leute Zombies sind. Mir geht es nicht nur und die geschichtliche Wahrheit über Deutschlands Größe, Unschuld und Jahrtausendleistungen, sondern um die radikale Veränderung der weißen Menschheit, damit wir nie wieder auf die verrückten, wahnsinnigen Lügen der Juden hereinfallen können!

Transl.:

To the nice praise of the lady comrade, who has sent me helpful donations for years, I can only say, with Pontius Pilate: “What is the truth ?!”

It is pointless if people are zombies.

I am not only concerned with the historical truth about Germany’s greatness, innocence and incredible achievements, which have benefited all mankind, but my goal is nothing less than the radical change of white humanity so that we can never again fall for the ridiculous, insane lies of these Jews!

 

–8 August 2019 US$45.60 from T in Australia via PayPal to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–8 August 2019 a valuable, health-related gift for Margi from J in Massachusetts

–4 August 2019 PayPal of $36 to mhuffstickler@outlook.com from G in Germany

–3 August 2019 PayPal of $500 to mhuffstickler@outlook.com from F in Holland

–2 August 2019 PayPal of $50 to mhuffstickler@outlook.com from M in Florida

–2 August 2019 check for $75 from G in Cicero, Illinois

–25 July 2019 $75 check from G in Nevada

–22 July 20 euros, birthday card and note from S in Germany

–20 July 2019 $59 MoneyGram money order and touching letter from J in Maryland

 

–19 Juli 2019 Check from G. in Nevada

+

–13 July 2019 $20 cash in aluminum foil from O in Florida

–11 July 2019 $100 cash from DD in NYC and $20 Australian from J

–9 July 2019 Cash from C in Maryland

–5 July 2019 check from a loyal donor out west.

–28 June 2019 $75 by check from H in Utah

–24 June 2019 cash from former Marine P in Florida

–21 June 2019 check from J in Cicero, Illinois

–20 June 2019 $200 via PayPal to mhuffstickler@outlook.clom from R in Holland

–19 June 2019 check from G. in Cicero, Illinois

–15 June 2019 money order from C in Texas

–13 June 2019 check from G in Cicero, Illinois

–9 June 2019 $22 via PayPal from M in Florida and check from J in Nevada

–8 June 2019 20 dollars Australian from J in New South Wales, “Down Under” and a nice note for Margi, fighting her cancer bravely and maybe winning now, and thanking you very much!

I am holding here a stick of silver birch, which produces a growth called “chaga” that fights cancer and by which many Russians and Finns swear.

We took a friend’s Scotty along Lake Superior yesterday

.

–6 June 2019 (in honor of D-Day 😉 ) check from J in Nevada

–3 June 2019 PayPal from R in France

–3 June 2019 cash from T in Texas

–2 June 2019 PayPal from T in Texas

–3o  May 2019 check from G. in Cicero, Illinois

–26 May 2019 $110 from D in Australia via PayPal to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–23  May 2019 check from G. in Cicero, Illinois

–16 May 2019 50 euros in cash from A in Germany

containing this note: “With best wishes for Margi’s further recover and all good things, and also thanks to you for your grand work for truth and justice. A”

–15 May 2019 PayPal for $88 to mhuffstickler@outlook.com from M in Florida

–14 May 2019 check from G in Nevada

–10 May 2019 check from TBR magazine

–7 May 2019 $50 by check from J in Cicero, Illinois

–5 May 2019 $888.88 via PayPal to mhuffstickler@outlook.com from L in Scotland, a repeat generous donor to my work, but this was specifically to support Margi, who is not just a great woman (and one who, never having smoked or drank, truly did not deserve to get throat cancer) but she is also a fierce, fearless, honest, caring and loyal lady comrade.

Thank you so much, L!

Me wearing a Nehru shirt that Margi made once for her brother in the late 1960s 🙂

 

–3 May 2019 $50 via PayPal to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

Hi John, I sent your lovely companion 50 bucks via PayPal. Best wishes for you both in this hard time.

–2 May 2019 check from J in Nevada

–29 April 2019 $200 via PayPal from E in Virginia

 

–28 April 2019 via PP from T in Arizona

–24 April 2019 check from J in Nevada

–22 April 2019 $100 from P in New England via PayPal to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–19 April 2019 $108.34 via PayPal from F in Germany (Paid by F[] fr[]@gmx.net, Transaction ID 1NU[] Note: Für Ihre Behandlung [ + “for your treatments”], Frau Huffstickler. Gruβ an Herrn de Nugent. 🙂 )

–15 April 2019 check from J in Nevada

–13 April 2019 check from P in Washington DC

–11 April 2019 cash from K in New England

 

–10 April 2019 PayPal for 250 Euros (US$271.56) from S in Germany

–9 April 2019 check from G in Nevada

–2 April 2019 check from G in Nevada

–26 March 2019 check from G in Nevada

–20 March 2019 PayPal from P in New England

–18 March 2019 check from G in Nevada

–11 March 2019 check from G in Nevada

–10 March PayPal from M to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–4 March 2019 check from G in Nevada

–26 February 2019 PayPal from M to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–25 February 2019 check from G in Nevada

–18 February 2019 check from G in Nevada

–15 February 2019 100 euros ($US 108) via PayPal to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–11 February 2019 check from G in Nevada

–9 February 2019 PayPal to mhuffstickler@yahoo.com

–8 February cash given to me in person by J of Baltimore, visiting the UP

–4 February 2019 check from G in Nevada

–3 February 2019 Stripe from R in Texas

–28 January 2019 check from G in Nevada

–24 January 2019 Paypal from KR in USA

–19 January 2019 check from G in Nevada

–14 January 2019 cash and card from a former Marine and part-Italian from “the Sunshine State”

–12 January 2019 check from G in Nevada

–5 January 2019 Stripe from P in California

–3 January 2019 cash from K in Massachusetts

–31 December 2018 Paypal from IS in South Carolina

–31 December 2018 check from G in Nevada

–29 December 2018 20 Australian dollars and fascinating info on civilization on Mars from P in Australia

–25 December 2018 PayPal from I in South Carolina

–24 December 2018 check from G in Nevada

–23 December 2018 €99.99  from S in Germany to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–21 December 2018 Stripe from M in England

–20 December 2018 Stripe from P in Maryland

–19 December 2018 check from G in Nevada

Like this August check — a recurring amount

–13 December 2018 silver coin from the Royal Australian Mint from M in Indiana

–11 December  Books and booklets in German, French and English from the library of the late, great publisher Willis Carto (https://johndenugent.com/in-memoriam-willis-allison-carto/), sent by his widow Elizabeth

–10 December 2018 check from G in Nevada

–3 December 2018 check from G in Nevada

–26 November 2018 Books and booklets in German, French and English from the library of the late, great publisher Willis Carto (https://johndenugent.com/in-memoriam-willis-allison-carto/), sent by his widow Elizabeth

also

–24 November 2018 cash from Bismark, North Dakota, and “Thank you for your writings!”

–12 and 19 November 2018….. a fanatically faithful Rockwell party activist sent this

–6 November 2018 PayPal from the Netherlands to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–6 November 2018 — yet again, an Australian comes through for me and our race

 

–5  November 2018….. an old, fanatically faithful, do-something Rockwell party activist sent this…

 

–2 November 2018 Stripe from D in Australia

–31 October 2018 PayPal from S in Germany

–28 October 2018 check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

….23 October 2018 the pretty Walgreens girl sent $120

–21 October 2018 check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

–15 October 2018 check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

–8 October 2018 check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

–3 October 2018 PayPal from M in Florida to mhuffstickler@outlook.com

–1 October 2018 check from G in Nevada

–24 September 2018 check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

–17 September 2018 PayPal from S in Germany

–17 September  2018 PayPal from M in Florida

–10 September check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

–3 September 2018 check from G in Utah

–24 August 2018 check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

–17 August 2018 PayPal from S in Germany, check from G in Utah

–15 August 2018 PayPal from M in Florida

–13 August 2018 check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

–8 August 2018 check from a former Rockwell-party stormtrooper out west

–6 August 2018 cash from C in North Dakota

–2 August 2018 PayPal from B in New York

–2 August 2018 medical (health-food) donations for Margi to help her fight cancer, and something yummy for us both 😉

–1 August 2018 via Stripe from N in Michigan

–30 July 2018 cash from P in Florida

–30 July 2018 via Paypal from S in Germany

 

–30 July 2018 via PayPal from P in Massachusetts

–11 July 2018 donation via PayPal from K in Germany

–4 July 2018 donation via PayPal from M in Florida

–2, 9, 16, 23, 30 July 2018 checks from G in Nevada

–4, 11, 18,  26 June, 2018 check from G in Nevada

–26 May 2018, check from G in Nevada

–21 May 2018, check from G in Nevada

–14 May 2018, check from G in Nevada, letter and cash from N in New Hampshire

 

*** back to Wiki

 

Some researchers believe that C-PTSD is distinct from, but similar to, PTSD, somatization disorder, dissociative identity disorder, and borderline personality disorder.[6]

Its main distinctions are a distortion of the person’s core identity and significant emotional dysregulation.[7] It was first described in 1992 by Judith Herman in her book Trauma & Recovery and in an accompanying article.[6][8] The disorder is included in the draft version of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 11th Edition (ICD-11) which is still in the approval process. This category of PTSD is not yet adopted by the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).

The diagnosis of PTSD was originally developed for adults who had suffered from a single event trauma, such as rape, or a traumatic experience during a war.[9] However, the situation for many children is quite different. Children can suffer chronic trauma such as maltreatment, family violence, and a disruption in attachment to their primary caregiver.[10] In many cases, it is the child’s caregiver who caused the trauma.[9] The diagnosis of PTSD does not take into account how the developmental stages of children may affect their symptoms and how trauma can affect a child’s development.[9]

The term developmental trauma disorder (DTD) has been proposed as the childhood equivalent of C-PTSD.[10] This developmental form of trauma places children at risk for developing psychiatric and medical disorders.[10] Bessel van der Kolk explains DTD as numerous encounters with interpersonal trauma such as physical assault, sexual assault, violence or death. It can also be brought on by subjective events such as betrayal, defeat or shame.[11]

Repeated traumatization during childhood leads to symptoms that differ from those described for PTSD.[11] Cook and others describe symptoms and behavioural characteristics in seven domains:[12][13]

Attachment – “problems with relationship boundaries, lack of trust, social isolation, difficulty perceiving and responding to others’ emotional states”
Biology – “sensory-motor developmental dysfunction, sensory-integration difficulties, somatization, and increased medical problems”
Affect or emotional regulation – “poor affect regulation, difficulty identifying and expressing emotions and internal states, and difficulties communicating needs, wants, and wishes”
Dissociation – “amnesia, depersonalization, discrete states of consciousness with discrete memories, affect, and functioning, and impaired memory for state-based events”
Behavioural control – “problems with impulse control, aggression, pathological self-soothing, and sleep problems”
Cognition – “difficulty regulating attention, problems with a variety of ‘executive functions’ such as planning, judgement, initiation, use of materials, and self-monitoring, difficulty processing new information, difficulty focusing and completing tasks, poor object constancy, problems with ’cause-effect’ thinking, and language developmental problems such as a gap between receptive and expressive communication abilities.”
Self-concept – “fragmented and disconnected autobiographical narrative, disturbed body image, low self-esteem, excessive shame, and negative internal working models of self”.

Adults[edit]
Adults with C-PTSD have sometimes experienced prolonged interpersonal traumatization beginning in childhood, rather than, or as well as, in adulthood. These early injuries interrupt the development of a robust sense of self and of others. Because physical and emotional pain or neglect was often inflicted by attachment figures such as caregivers or older siblings, these individuals may develop a sense that they are fundamentally flawed and that others cannot be relied upon.[8][14] This can become a pervasive way of relating to others in adult life, described as insecure attachment. This symptom is neither included in the diagnosis of dissociative disorder nor in that of PTSD in the current DSM-5 (2013). Individuals with Complex PTSD also demonstrate lasting personality disturbances with a significant risk of revictimization.[15]

Six clusters of symptoms have been suggested for diagnosis of C-PTSD:[16][17]
alterations in regulation of affect and impulses;
alterations in attention or consciousness;
alterations in self-perception;
alterations in relations with others;
somatization;
alterations in systems of meaning.[17]
Experiences in these areas may include:[6][18][19]

Changes in emotional regulation, including experiences such as persistent dysphoria, chronic suicidal preoccupation, self injury, explosive or extremely inhibited anger (may alternate), and compulsive or extremely inhibited sexuality (may alternate).
V

ariations in consciousness, such as amnesia or improved recall for traumatic events, episodes of dissociation, depersonalization/derealization, and reliving experiences (either in the form of intrusive PTSD symptoms or in ruminative preoccupation).
Changes in self-perception, such as a sense of helplessness or paralysis of initiative, shame, guilt and self-blame, a sense of defilement or stigma, and a sense of being completely different from other human beings (may include a sense of specialness, utter aloneness, a belief that no other person can understand, or a feeling of nonhuman identity).

Varied changes in perception of the perpetrators, such as a preoccupation with the relationship with a perpetrator (including a preoccupation with revenge), an unrealistic attribution of total power to a perpetrator (though the individual’s assessment may be more realistic than the clinician’s), idealization or paradoxical gratitude, a sense of a special or supernatural relationship with a perpetrator, and acceptance of a perpetrator’s belief system or rationalizations.

Alterations in relations with others, such as isolation and withdrawal, disruption in intimate relationships, a repeated search for a rescuer (may alternate with isolation and withdrawal), persistent distrust, and repeated failures of self-protection.
Changes in systems of meaning, such as a loss of sustaining faith and a sense of hopelessness and despair.
Diagnostics[edit]
Main article: Posttraumatic stress disorder

C-PTSD was under consideration for inclusion in the DSM-IV but was not included when the DSM-IV was published in 1994.[6] Neither was it included in the DSM-5. PTSD continues to be listed as a disorder.[20]
Differential diagnosis[edit]
Post-traumatic stress disorder[edit]
Main article: Posttraumatic stress disorder

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was included in the DSM-III (1980), mainly due to the relatively large numbers of American combat veterans of the Vietnam War who were seeking treatment for the lingering effects of combat stress. In the 1980s, various researchers and clinicians suggested that PTSD might also accurately describe the sequelae of such traumas as child sexual abuse and domestic abuse.[21] However, it was soon suggested that PTSD failed to account for the cluster of symptoms that were often observed in cases of prolonged abuse, particularly that which was perpetrated against children by caregivers during multiple childhood and adolescent developmental stages. Such patients were often extremely difficult to treat with established methods.[21]

PTSD descriptions fail to capture some of the core characteristics of C-PTSD. These elements include captivity, psychological fragmentation, the loss of a sense of safety, trust, and self-worth, as well as the tendency to be revictimized. Most importantly, there is a loss of a coherent sense of self: this loss, and the ensuing symptom profile, most pointedly differentiates C-PTSD from PTSD.[18]

C-PTSD is also characterized by attachment disorder, particularly the pervasive insecure, or disorganized-type attachment.[22] DSM-IV (1994) dissociative disorders and PTSD do not include insecure attachment in their criteria. As a consequence of this aspect of C-PTSD, when some adults with C-PTSD become parents and confront their own children’s attachment needs, they may have particular difficulty in responding sensitively especially to their infants’ and young children’s routine distress—such as during routine separations, despite these parents’ best intentions and efforts.[23] Although the great majority of survivors do not abuse others,[24] this difficulty in parenting may have adverse repercussions for their children’s social and emotional development if parents with this condition and their children do not receive appropriate treatment.[25][26]

Thus, a differentiation between the diagnostic category of C-PTSD and that of PTSD has been suggested. C-PTSD better describes the pervasive negative impact of chronic repetitive trauma than does PTSD alone.[19] PTSD can exist alongside C-PTSD, however a sole diagnosis of PTSD often does not sufficiently encapsulate the breadth of symptoms experienced by those who have experienced prolonged traumatic experience, and therefore C-PTSD extends beyond the PTSD parameters.[8]

C-PTSD also differs from continuous traumatic stress disorder (CTSD), which was introduced into the trauma literature by Gill Straker (1987).[27] It was originally used by South African clinicians to describe the effects of exposure to frequent, high levels of violence usually associated with civil conflict and political repression. The term is also applicable to the effects of exposure to contexts in which gang violence and crime are endemic as well as to the effects of ongoing exposure to life threats in high-risk occupations such as police, fire and emergency services.

Traumatic grief[edit]
Main articles: Grief and Grief counseling

Traumatic grief[28][29][30][31] or complicated mourning[32] are conditions[33] where both trauma and grief coincide. There are conceptual links between trauma and bereavement since loss of a loved one is inherently traumatic.[34] If a traumatic event was life-threatening, but did not result in a death, then it is more likely that the survivor will experience post-traumatic stress symptoms. If a person dies, and the survivor was close to the person who died, then it is more likely that symptoms of grief will also develop. When the death is of a loved one, and was sudden or violent, then both symptoms often coincide. This is likely in children exposed to community violence.[35][36]
For C-PTSD to manifest traumatic grief, the violence would occur under conditions of captivity, loss of control and disempowerment, coinciding with the death of a friend or loved one in life-threatening circumstances. This again is most likely for children and stepchildren who experience prolonged domestic or chronic community violence that ultimately results in the death of friends and loved ones. The phenomenon of the increased risk of violence and death of stepchildren is referred to as the Cinderella effect.
Attachment theory and borderline personality disorder[edit]
Main articles: Attachment theory and Borderline personality disorder

C-PTSD may share some symptoms with both PTSD and borderline personality disorder.[37]
Treatment[edit]
Treatment is usually tailored to the individual.[38]
Children[edit]

The utility of PTSD derived psychotherapies for assisting children with C-PTSD is uncertain. This area of diagnosis and treatment calls for caution in use of the category C-PTSD. Ford and van der Kolk have suggested that C-PTSD may not be as useful a category for diagnosis and treatment of children as a proposed category of developmental trauma disorder (DTD).[39] For DTD to be diagnosed it requires a
‘history of exposure to early life developmentally adverse interpersonal trauma such as sexual abuse, physical abuse, violence, traumatic losses of other significant disruption or betrayal of the child’s relationships with primary caregivers, which has been postulated as an etiological basis for complex traumatic stress disorders. Diagnosis, treatment planning and outcome are always relational.'[40]
Since C-PTSD or DTD in children is often caused by chronic maltreatment, neglect or abuse in a care-giving relationship the first element of the biopsychosocial system to address is that relationship. This invariably involves some sort of child protection agency. This both widens the range of support that can be given to the child but also the complexity of the situation, since the agency’s statutory legal obligations may then need to be enforced.

A number of practical, therapeutic and ethical principles for assessment and intervention have been developed and explored in the field:[41]
Identifying and addressing threats to the child’s or family’s safety and stability are the first priority.

A relational bridge must be developed to engage, retain and maximize the benefit for the child and caregiver.
Diagnosis, treatment planning and outcome monitoring are always relational (and) strengths based.
All phases of treatment should aim to enhance self-regulation competencies.
Determining with whom, when and how to address traumatic memories.
Preventing and managing relational discontinuities and psychosocial crises.
Adults[edit]
Delaying therapy for people with complex PTSD (cPTSD), whether intentionally or not, can exacerbate the condition.[42] Herman proposed that recovery from C-PTSD occurs in three stages:
establishing safety,
remembrance and mourning for what was lost,
reconnecting with community and more broadly, society.
Herman believes recovery can only occur within a healing relationship and only if the survivor is empowered by that relationship. This healing relationship need not be romantic or sexual in the colloquial sense of “relationship”, however, and can also include relationships with friends, co-workers, one’s relatives or children, and the therapeutic relationship.[6]

Complex trauma means complex reactions and this leads to complex treatments. Hence, treatment for C-PTSD requires a multi-modal approach.[13] It has been suggested that treatment for C-PTSD should differ from treatment for PTSD by focusing on problems that cause more functional impairment than the PTSD symptoms. These problems include emotional dysregulation, dissociation, and interpersonal problems.[22] Six suggested core components of complex trauma treatment include:[13]
Safety
Self-regulation
Self-reflective information processing
Traumatic experiences integration
Relational engagement
Positive affect enhancement

The above components can be conceptualized as a model with three phases. Every case will not be the same, but one can expect the first phase to consist of teaching adequate coping strategies and addressing safety concerns. The next phase would focus on decreasing avoidance of traumatic stimuli and applying coping skills learned in phase one. The care provider may also begin challenging assumptions about the trauma and introducing alternative narratives about the trauma. The final phase would consist of solidifying what has previously been learned and transferring these strategies to future stressful events.[43]
Multiple treatments have been suggested for C-PTSD. Among these treatments are experiential and emotionally focused therapy, internal family systems therapy, sensorimotor psychotherapy, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy (EMDR), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure therapy, psychodynamic therapy, family systems therapy and group therapy.[44]
Controversy[edit]
Despite growing popularity of the idea of complex PTSD with some mental health professionals, the fundamental research required for the proper validation of a new disorder is missing.[45] The disorder was proposed under the name DES-NOS for inclusion in the DSM-IV but was rejected for lack of sufficient diagnostic validity research. Chief among the limitations was a study which showed that 95% of individuals who could be diagnosed with the proposed DES-NOS were also diagnosable with PTSD, raising questions about the added usefulness of an additional disorder.[46] Following the failure of DES-NOS to gain formal recognition in the DSM-IV, the concept was re-packaged for children and adolescents and given a new name, developmental trauma disorder.[47] Supporters of DTD appealed to the developers of the DSM-5 to recognize DTD as a new disorder. Just as the developers of DSM-IV refused to included DES-NOS, the developers of DSM-5 refused to include DTD due to lack of sufficient research.

One of the main justifications offered for this proposed disorder has been that the current system of diagnosing PTSD plus comorbid disorders does not capture the wide array of symptoms in one diagnosis.[8] Because individuals who suffered repeated and prolonged traumas often show PTSD plus other concurrent psychiatric disorders, some researchers have argued that a single broad disorder such as C-PTSD provides a better and more parsimonious diagnosis than the current system of PTSD plus concurrent disorders.[48] This view fails to acknowledge that concurrent disorders are also common with PTSD following traumas that are not repeated or prolonged. In addition, there is no evidence that being labeled with a single disorder leads to better treatment than being labeled with PTSD plus concurrent disorders.[49]

Complex PTSD embraces a wider range of symptoms relative to PTSD, specifically emphasizing problems of emotional regulation, negative self-concept, and interpersonal problems. Diagnosing complex PTSD implies that this wider range of symptoms is caused by traumatic experiences but disregards the fact that the reverse pathway also exists. That is, this wider range of symptoms may pre-exist any experiences of trauma and may lead to a higher risk of experiencing future traumas.[49] It is also possible that this wider range of symptoms and higher risk of traumatization are related by hidden confounder variables and there is no causal relationship between symptoms and trauma experiences.

In the diagnosis of PTSD, the definition of the stressor event is narrowly limited to life-threatening events, with the implication that these are typically sudden and unexpected events. Complex PTSD vastly widened the definition of potential stressor events by calling them adverse events, and deliberating dropping reference to life-threatening, so that experiences can be included such as neglect, emotional abuse, or living in a war zone without having specifically experienced life-threatening events.[50] By broadening the stressor criterion, this has led to confusing differences between competing definitions of complex PTSD, and avoids the clear operationalization of symptoms that has been one of the successes of the DSM system.[51]

One of the other main justifications for a new disorder has been that individuals with C-PTSD are being missed by clinicians and being given the wrong treatments.[8][47] But this has been based on anecdotal speculation, and this narrative has never been supported with empirical evidence that this actually happens.

The movement to recognize complex PTSD has been criticized for approaching the process of diagnostic validation backwards. The typical process for validation of new disorders is to first publish case studies of individual patients who manifest all of these issues and clearly demonstrate how they are different from patients who experienced different types of traumas. There are no known case reports with prospective repeated assessments to clearly demonstrate that the alleged symptoms followed the adverse events. Then the next step would be to conduct well-designed group studies. Instead, supporters of complex PTSD have pushed for recognition of a disorder before conducting any of the prospective repeated assessments that are needed.[52]
See also[edit]
Attachment in adults
Attachment in children
Attachment-based psychotherapy
Hostage
Human bonding
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Psychosomatic medicine
Trauma model of mental disorders
Ethical guidelines for treating trauma survivors
References[edit]
^ Cook, A., et. al.,(2005) Complex Trauma in Children and Adolescents, Psychiatric Annals, 35:5, pp-398
^ Cortman, Christopher (2018-10-15). Keep pain in the past : getting over trauma, grief and the worst that’s ever happened to you. Walden, Joseph. Coral Gables, FL. ISBN 9781633538108. OCLC 1056250299.
^ Stein, Jacob Y.; Wilmot, Dayna V.; Solomon, Zahava (2016), “Does one size fit all? Nosological, clinical, and scientific implications of variations in ptsd criterion A”, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 43: 106–117, doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.07.001, PMID 27449856
^ Lewis Herman, Judith (1992). Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books.
^ Luxenberg, Toni; Spinazzola, Joseph; Van der Kolk, Bessel (November 2001). “Complex trauma and disorders of extreme stress (DESNOS) diagnosis, part one: Assessment”. Directions in Psychiatry. 21: 22.
^
Jump up to:
a b c d e Judith L. Herman (30 May 1997). Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence–From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-08730-3. Retrieved 29 October 2012.
^ Brewin, Chris R.; Cloitre, Marylène; Hyland, Philip; Shevlin, Mark; Maercker, Andreas; Bryant, Richard A.; Humayun, Asma; Jones, Lynne M.; Kagee, Ashraf; Rousseau, Cécile; Somasundaram, Daya; Suzuki, Yuriko; Wessely, Simon; Van Ommeren, Mark; Reed, Geoffrey M. (2017-12-01). “A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD”. Clinical Psychology Review. 58: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001. ISSN 0272-7358. PMID 29029837.
^
Jump up to:
a b c d e Herman, J. L. (1992). “Complex PTSD: A syndrome in survivors of prolonged and repeated trauma” (PDF). Journal of Traumatic Stress. 5 (3): 377–391. doi:10.1007/BF00977235.[permanent dead link]
^
Jump up to:
a b c “Complex Trauma And Developmental Trauma Disorder” (PDF). National Child Traumatic Stress Network. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 December 2013. Retrieved 14 November 2013.
^
Jump up to:
a b c Ford; Grasso; Greene; Levine; Spinazzola; Van Der Kolk (August 2013). “Clinical Significance of a Proposed Developmental Trauma Disorder Diagnosis: Results of an International Survey of Clinicians”. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 74 (8): 841–9. doi:10.4088/JCP.12m08030. PMID 24021504.
^
Jump up to:
a b van der Kolk (2005). “Developmental trauma disorder” (PDF). Psychiatric Annals. pp. 401–408. Retrieved 14 November 2013.
^ Cook, Alexandra; Blaustein, Margaret; Spinazzola, Joseph; et al., eds. (2003). Complex Trauma in Children and Adolescents: White Paper from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network, Complex Trauma Task Force (PDF). National Child Traumatic Stress Network. Retrieved 2013-11-14
^
Jump up to:
a b c Cook, A.; Blaustein, M.; Spinazzola, J.; Van Der Kolk, B. (2005). “Complex trauma in children and adolescents”. Psychiatric Annals. 35 (5): 390–398. doi:10.3928/00485713-20050501-05. Retrieved 2008-03-29.
^ Zlotnick, C.; Zakriski, A. L.; Shea, M. T.; Costello, E.; Begin, A.; Pearlstein, T.; Simpson, E. (1996). “The long-term sequelae of sexual abuse: Support for a complex posttraumatic stress disorder”. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 9 (2): 195–205. doi:10.1007/BF02110655. PMID 8731542.
^ Ide, N.; Paez, A. (2000). “Complex PTSD: A review of current issues”. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health. 2 (1): 43–49. PMID 11232103.
^ Roth, S.; Newman, E.; Pelcovitz, D.; Van Der Kolk, B.; Mandel, F. S. (1997). “Complex PTSD in victims exposed to sexual and physical abuse: Results from the DSM-IV Field Trial for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder”. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 10 (4): 539–555. doi:10.1002/jts.2490100403. PMID 9391940.
^
Jump up to:
a b Pelcovitz, D.; Van Der Kolk, B.; Roth, S.; Mandel, F.; Kaplan, S.; Resick, P. (1997). “Development of a criteria set and a structured interview for disorders of extreme stress (SIDES)”. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 10 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1002/jts.2490100103. PMID 9018674.
^
Jump up to:
a b Herman (1997), pp. 119–122
^
Jump up to:
a b “Complex PTSD”. www.ptsd.va.gov (National Center for PTSD). United States Department of Veterans Affairs. 2007.
^ American Psychiatric Association (2018-03-17). “American Psychiatric Association Board of Trustees Approves DSM-5”. American Psychiatric Association. Archived from the original on 4 May 2013. Retrieved 30 April 2013.
^
Jump up to:
a b Courtois, C. A. (2004). “Complex Trauma, Complex Reactions: Assessment and Treatment” (PDF). Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 41 (4): 412–425. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.600.157. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.41.4.412.
^
Jump up to:
a b Van Der Kolk, B. A.; Roth, S.; Pelcovitz, D.; Sunday, S.; Spinazzola, J. (2005). “Disorders of extreme stress: The empirical foundation of a complex adaptation to trauma” (PDF). Journal of Traumatic Stress. 18 (5): 389–399. doi:10.1002/jts.20047. PMID 16281237.
^ Schechter, D. S.; Coates, S. W.; Kaminer, T.; Coots, T.; Zeanah, C. H.; Davies, M.; Schonfeld, I. S.; Marshall, R. D.; Liebowitz, M. R.; Trabka, K. A.; McCaw, J. E.; Myers, M. M. (2008). “Distorted Maternal Mental Representations and Atypical Behavior in a Clinical Sample of Violence-Exposed Mothers and Their Toddlers”. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. 9 (2): 123–147. doi:10.1080/15299730802045666. PMC 2577290. PMID 18985165., pp. 123-149
^ Kaufman, J.; Zigler, E. (1987). “Do abused children become abusive parents?”. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 57 (2): 186–192. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03528.x. PMID 3296775.
^ Schechter, D. S.; Willheim, E. (2009). “Disturbances of Attachment and Parental Psychopathology in Early Childhood”. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 18 (3): 665–686. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2009.03.001. PMC 2690512. PMID 19486844.
^ Schechter, D. S.; Zygmunt, A.; Coates, S. W.; Davies, M.; Trabka, K. A.; McCaw, J.; Kolodji, A.; Robinson, J. L. (2007). “Caregiver traumatization adversely impacts young children’s mental representations on the MacArthur Story Stem Battery”. Attachment & Human Development. 9 (3): 187–205. doi:10.1080/14616730701453762. PMC 2078523. PMID 18007959.
^ Straker, Gillian (1987). “The Continuous Traumatic Stress Syndrome. The Single Therapeutic Interview”. Psychology in Society (8): 46–79.
^ Bonanno, G. A. (2006). “Is Complicated Grief a Valid Construct?”. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 13 (2): 129–134. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00014.x.
^ Jacobs, C. M.; Mazure, C.; Prigerson, H. (2000). “Diagnostic Criteria for Traumatic Grief”. Death Studies. 24 (3): 185–199. doi:10.1080/074811800200531. PMID 11010626.
^ Ambrose, Jeannette. “Traumatic Grief: What We Need to Know as Trauma Responders” (PDF).
^ Charles Figley (1 April 1997). Death And Trauma: The Traumatology Of Grieving. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-56032-525-3. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
^ Therese A. Rando (February 1993). Treatment of complicated mourning. Research Press. ISBN 978-0-87822-329-9. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
^ Rando, Therese A. (1 January 1994). “Complications in Mourning Traumatic Death.”. In Corless, Inge B.; Germino, Barbara B.; Pittman, Mary (eds.). Dying, death, and bereavement: theoretical perspectives and other ways of knowing. Jones and Bartlett. pp. 253–271. ISBN 978-0-86720-631-9. Retrieved 28 October 2012
^ Green, B. L. (2000). “Traumatic Loss: Conceptual and Empirical Links Between Trauma and Bereavement”. Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss. 5: 1–17. doi:10.1080/10811440008407845.
^ Pynoos, R. S.; Nader, K. (1988). “Psychological first aid and treatment approach to children exposed to community violence: Research implications”. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1 (4): 445–473. doi:10.1002/jts.2490010406.
^ “Psychological First Aid” (PDF). Adapted from Pynoos, R. S.; Nader, K. (1988). “Psychological first aid and treatment approach to children exposed to community violence: Research implications”. Journal of Traumatic Stress 1 (4): 445. National Child Traumatic Stress Network.
^ Van Der Kolk, B. A.; Courtois, C. A. (2005). “Editorial comments: Complex developmental trauma” (PDF). Journal of Traumatic Stress. 18 (5): 385–388. doi:10.1002/jts.20046. PMID 16281236.
^ Schnyder, U; Ehlers, A; Elbert, T; Foa, EB; Gersons, BP; Resick, PA; Shapiro, F; Cloitre, M (2015). “Psychotherapies for PTSD: what do they have in common?”. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 6: 28186. doi:10.3402/ejpt.v6.28186. PMC 4541077. PMID 26290178.
^ Courtois & Ford (2009), p. 60
^ Courtois & Ford (2009), ch. 3
^ Courtois & Ford (2009), p. 67
^ De Jongh, A; Resick, PA; Zoellner, LA; van Minnen, A; Lee, CW; Monson, CM; Foa, EB; Wheeler, K; Broeke, ET; Feeny, N; Rauch, SA; Chard, KM; Mueser, KT; Sloan, DM; van der Gaag, M; Rothbaum, BO; Neuner, F; de Roos, C; Hehenkamp, LM; Rosner, R; Bicanic, IA (May 2016). “Critical analysis of the current treatment guidelines for complex PTSD in adults”. Depression and Anxiety. 33 (5): 359–69. doi:10.1002/da.22469. PMID 26840244.
^ Lawson, David (July 2017). “Treating Adults With Complex Trauma: An Evidence-Based Case Study”. Journal of Counseling and Development. 95 (3): 288–298. doi:10.1002/jcad.12143.
^ Courtois & Ford (2009)
^ Keane, T.M. (2013). “Interview: Does complex trauma exist? A “long view” based on science and service in the trauma field”. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session. 69 (5): 510–515. doi:10.1002/jclp.21991. PMID 23564601.
^ Roth, S.; Newman, E.; Pelcovitz, D.; van der Kolk, B.A.; Mandel, F.C. (1997). “Complex PTSD in victims exposed to sexual and physical abuse: Results from the DSM-IV field trial for posttraumatic stress disorder”. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 10 (4): 539–555. doi:10.1002/jts.2490100403.
^
Jump up to:
a b van der Kolk, B.A. (2005). “Developmental trauma disorder: toward a rational diagnosis for children with complex trauma histories”. Psychiatric Annals. 35 (5): 401–408. doi:10.3928/00485713-20050501-06.
^ D’Andrea, W.; Ford, J.D.; Stolbach, B.; Spinazzola, J.; van der Kolk, B.A. (2012). “Understanding interpersonal trauma in children: why we need a developmentally appropriate trauma diagnosis”. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 82 (2): 187–200. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01154.x. PMID 22506521.
^
Jump up to:
a b Schmid, M.; Petermann, F.; Fegert, J.M. (2013). “Developmental trauma disorder: pros and cons of including formal criteria in the psychiatric diagnostic systems”. BMC Psychiatry. 13: 1–12. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-3. PMC 3541245. PMID 23286319.
^ Brewin, C.R.; Cloitre, M.; Hyland, P.; Shevlind, M.; Maerckere, A.; Bryant, R.A.; Humayung, A.; Jonesh, L.M.; Kageei, A.; Rousseauj, C.; Somasundaramk, D.; Suzukil, Y.; Wesselym, S.; van Ommerenn, M.; Reed, G.M. (2017). “A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD”. Clinical Psychology Review. 58: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001. PMID 29029837.
^ Scheeringa, M.S. (2015). “Untangling Psychiatric Comorbidity in Young Children Who Experienced Single, Repeated, or Hurricane Katrina Traumatic Events”. Child and Youth Care Forum. 44 (4): 475–492. doi:10.1007/s10566-014-9293-7. PMC 4511493. PMID 26213455.
^ Scheeringa, Michael, S (2017-10-10). “Chapter 8. Facing the Disinformation Critics of the DSM-5”. They’ll Never Be the Same: A Parent’s Guide to PTSD in Youth. Central Recovery Press. ISBN 9781942094616.
Further reading[edit]
Walker, Pete (2013-12-13). Complex PTSD: From Surviving to Thriving: A Guide and Map for Recovering from Childhood Trauma. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 9781492871842.
Appleyard, K.; Osofsky, J. D. (2003). “Parenting after trauma: Supporting parents and caregivers in the treatment of children impacted by violence” (PDF). Infant Mental Health Journal. 24 (2): 111–125. doi:10.1002/imhj.10050.
John Briere; Catherine Scott (30 August 2012). Principles of Trauma Therapy: A Guide to Symptoms, Evaluation, and Treatment. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4129-8143-9. Retrieved 29 October 2012.
Ford, J. D. (1999). “Disorders of extreme stress following war-zone military trauma: Associated features of posttraumatic stress disorder or comorbid but distinct syndromes?”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 67 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.1.3. PMID 10028203.
Scheeringa, Michael, S (2017-10-10). “Chapter 8. Facing the Disinformation Critics of the DSM-5”. They’ll Never Be the Same: A Parent’s Guide to PTSD in Youth. Central Recovery Press. ISBN 9781942094616.

3 Comments

  1. Dear John, can you please share this:

    https://www.xyz.net.au/white-genocide-of-the-chachapoyas/

    White Genocide of the Chachapoyas

    https://www.xyz.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1046.jpg

    At the head of the Amazon River, deep in the cloud forests of the Peruvian Andes lived a tribe of white people known as the Chachapoyas (Warriors of the Clouds). These hardy people farmed the hillsides, raised livestock and guinea pigs for food. The Chachapoyas civilisation consisted of a number of small cities spread out over vast mountainous terrain. They are believed to be the last of the white tribes that once inhabited the lands down as far as Northern Chile where the worlds oldest mummies can be found. Some archaeologists have speculated that the cloud people could have been European exiles who escaped during the Roman conquests of the Celtic or Carthaginian lands.

    The Chachapoyas dead were meticulously mummified and carefully placed on ledges and tombs overlooking the valleys of their living space. Sometimes they built hollow Easter Island like structures around the mummies and painted them with red, white, yellow and black ochre. The mummies watched over their land to ward off evil. Should ever the wicked heart of an anti-white set eyes upon a mummy they would be cursed to live out the rest of their short lives in madness and guilt.

    It is conceivable that as the Asiatic Amerindians pushed into their living space the white genocide process began. First it was non-violent, consisting of individuals falling in love and being accepted into each others tribes. Then as the Inca realised that the Chachapoyas cities were small enough to conquer and had land and resources that they wanted the preparations for war began.

    Possibly due to Incan aggression the Chahapoyas constructed their massive hilltop fortified-city complex of Kuelap, known as the Machu Picchu of the North. This fortified-city was made from hundreds of tons of stone blocks and at the top they built their unique round houses with pointy thatched roofs. It is believed that the Chachapoyas were fearsome warriors and were able to defend themselves against savage Incan attacks for many generations.

    https://www.xyz.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1045.jpg

    In 1493 the Chachapoyas were finally over powered and white genocide became violent. The tall fair women were carted off to become wives of the conquerors. The Inca introduced a policy called ‘Mitma’ where they resettled many Chachapoyas to other parts of the empire and brought in thousands of non-whites to assimilate with them in order to eliminate the Chachapoyas race and culture to prevent them from ever demanding self determination and freedom from taxation and parasitism while their land was plundered.

    When the Spanish arrived in 1532 on their quest to subdue the mighty Incan empire many of the remaining white tribesmen joined the Spanish army to exact revenge on the blood thirsty Inca. Unfortunately many Chachapoyas succumbed to small pox and suffered under Spanish rule as well. Demographics is destiny. Today the Chachapoyas have comparatively lighter skin, fairer hair and are still known for their beauty.

    Interestingly some Chachapoyas have an uncanny resemblance of Irish or the Basque people and used what we know as the Celtic cross in their jewellery. They still adorn their artefacts with the curved swastika of the ancient Europeans.

    https://www.xyz.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1053.jpg

    https://www.xyz.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1054.jpg

    The 10th stage of genocide is ‘Denial’. Anti-whites deny that the targeted group ever existed at all. Much effort is made by the globalist establishment to prevent thorough investigations on these archaeological findings should they shed light on current events. Even the Lonely Planet guide book that most travellers refer to has white washed it’s pages of any references to the fairness of the Chachapoyas.

    https://www.xyz.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1056.jpg

    “The Chachapoyas, or ‘People of the Clouds,’ controlled the vast swath of land around present-day Chachapoyas from AD 500 to around 1493, when the Incas conquered the area and ended the Chacha isolation. Very little is known about this civilization, whose inhabitants were thought to be great warriors, powerful shamans and prolific builders who were responsible for one of the most advanced civilizations of Peru’s tropical jungles. Today, among the many dozens of cliff tombs and hamlets of circular structures left behind, archaeologists match wits with grave robbers in a race to uncover the heritage of the Chachapoyas.”

    The Rough Guide travellers guide book on the other hand still includes honest descriptions.

    “In Aymara, Chachapoyas means “the cloud people”, perhaps a description of the fair-skinned tribes who used to dominate this region, living in one of at least seven major cities (like Kuelap, Magdalena and Purunllacta), each one located high up above the Utcubamba Valley or a tributary of this, on prominent, dramatic peaks and ridges. Many of the local inhabitants still have light-coloured hair and remarkably pale faces. The Chachapoyas people, despite building great fortifications, were eventually subdued by the empire-building Incas. Chachapoyas was once a colonial possession rich with gold and silver mines as well as extremely fertile alluvial soil, before falling into decline during the Republican era.”

    https://www.xyz.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IMG_1057.jpg

    https://www.amren.com/news/2013/09/how-did-blonde-whites-arrive-in-peru-before-columbus/Those in search of the legacy of the Celts naturally travel to sites in Germany, France, and other countries of Western Europe to find the remnants of settlements, burial grounds, and fortifications. They can now go to South America, to the eastern edge of the Andes, to admire buildings and other cultural achievements of that early European people and their descendants—all from a time many centuries before the first crossing by Christopher Columbus. Celts, in fact, arrived long before Columbus in the New World, together with Carthaginians.

    That is the claim now being made by cultural scientist and documentary filmmaker Hans Giffhorn. In his view, there is reliable evidence that the Chachapoya mountain people who were living in eastern Peru at the time of the arrival of the Spaniards in the 16th century, and whose numerous descendants still live there, were closely related to the Celts.

    Ever since the first conquistadors, the Chachapoya, because of their appearance—white, red-haired and some with freckles—as well as their lifestyle, have been a big mystery for anthropologists. Now Giffhorn, in his book Was America Discovered in Antiquity? Carthaginians, Celts and the Mystery of the Chachapoya (“Wurde Amerika in der Antike entdeckt? Karthager, Kelten und das Rätsel der Chachapoya”), has come closer to providing an answer, particularly because he is supported by genetic analysis that traces hereditary relationships.
    Chachapoya

    https://i1.wp.com/www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Chachapoyas.jpg?w=500&ssl=1

    Posted on September 17, 2013
    How Did Blonde Whites Arrive in Peru Before Columbus?

    Ulli Kulke, Die Welt, August 5, 2013

    [Editor’s Note: The following is a translation from the original German.]

    Those in search of the legacy of the Celts naturally travel to sites in Germany, France, and other countries of Western Europe to find the remnants of settlements, burial grounds, and fortifications. They can now go to South America, to the eastern edge of the Andes, to admire buildings and other cultural achievements of that early European people and their descendants—all from a time many centuries before the first crossing by Christopher Columbus. Celts, in fact, arrived long before Columbus in the New World, together with Carthaginians.

    That is the claim now being made by cultural scientist and documentary filmmaker Hans Giffhorn. In his view, there is reliable evidence that the Chachapoya mountain people who were living in eastern Peru at the time of the arrival of the Spaniards in the 16th century, and whose numerous descendants still live there, were closely related to the Celts.

    Ever since the first conquistadors, the Chachapoya, because of their appearance—white, red-haired and some with freckles—as well as their lifestyle, have been a big mystery for anthropologists. Now Giffhorn, in his book Was America Discovered in Antiquity? Carthaginians, Celts and the Mystery of the Chachapoya (“Wurde Amerika in der Antike entdeckt? Karthager, Kelten und das Rätsel der Chachapoya”), has come closer to providing an answer, particularly because he is supported by genetic analysis that traces hereditary relationships.
    Chachapoya

    Chachapoya

    Celts came from Mallorca

    The audacious thesis of the book is this: At the beginning of the second century BC, after the destruction of their capital, a large number of Carthaginians feared that the Romans wanted to finish them off. They escaped, deliberately seeking a new home in another part of the world, as far as possible from their enemies. To this end, they allied themselves with the Celts, probably from Mallorca, who had often served them as mercenaries.

    Various books on pre-Columbian transatlantic contacts now fill entire book shelves. Sculptures with negroid features are cited as evidence, as are world maps that include South America from a time before the area was discovered; reports from the Middle Ages of trips to large, exotic islands and lands in the far west of the Atlantic; very old archaeological discoveries of metals that do not exist in America; ten-thousand-year-old skulls with features that do not correspond to those of Native Americans; and apparently ancient stone buildings built in a European-Romanesque style.

    Giffhorn once considered all this implausible. He notes that his original interest in this research was to refute all these theories, and disprove early crossings—but then he encountered the Chachapoya.

    On one point Giffhorn’s theory is supported by other theorists of early connections: The crossing was not impossible in ancient times, at least not for the Carthaginians, who were a Phoenician sea-going people. Long before Christ, Phoenicians reached the Gulf of Guinea, and in all probability circumnavigated the Dark Continent 500 years before Chris—at least as reported by the Greek historian Herodotus.

    Peruvians call them “Gringuitos”

    Then as now, when ships venture too far off the West African coast—as Giffhorn thinks the Carthaginians did for fear of the Romans—currents and winds drive them almost inevitably toward South America. Some narrations of journeys from the early days of discovery confirm this.

    According to Giffhorn it was at first by chance—he was a documentary filmmaker in search of a species of extinct Hummingbird—that he encountered the descendants of the Chachapoya in Peru, and after many discussions with archaeologists and other historians there, learned the history of this nation. Today, Peruvians call the Chachapoya descendants “Gringuitos.”

    https://i0.wp.com/www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Gringuita.jpg?w=500&ssl=1

    Posted on September 17, 2013
    How Did Blonde Whites Arrive in Peru Before Columbus?

    Ulli Kulke, Die Welt, August 5, 2013

    [Editor’s Note: The following is a translation from the original German.]

    Those in search of the legacy of the Celts naturally travel to sites in Germany, France, and other countries of Western Europe to find the remnants of settlements, burial grounds, and fortifications. They can now go to South America, to the eastern edge of the Andes, to admire buildings and other cultural achievements of that early European people and their descendants—all from a time many centuries before the first crossing by Christopher Columbus. Celts, in fact, arrived long before Columbus in the New World, together with Carthaginians.

    That is the claim now being made by cultural scientist and documentary filmmaker Hans Giffhorn. In his view, there is reliable evidence that the Chachapoya mountain people who were living in eastern Peru at the time of the arrival of the Spaniards in the 16th century, and whose numerous descendants still live there, were closely related to the Celts.

    Ever since the first conquistadors, the Chachapoya, because of their appearance—white, red-haired and some with freckles—as well as their lifestyle, have been a big mystery for anthropologists. Now Giffhorn, in his book Was America Discovered in Antiquity? Carthaginians, Celts and the Mystery of the Chachapoya (“Wurde Amerika in der Antike entdeckt? Karthager, Kelten und das Rätsel der Chachapoya”), has come closer to providing an answer, particularly because he is supported by genetic analysis that traces hereditary relationships.
    Chachapoya

    Chachapoya

    Celts came from Mallorca

    The audacious thesis of the book is this: At the beginning of the second century BC, after the destruction of their capital, a large number of Carthaginians feared that the Romans wanted to finish them off. They escaped, deliberately seeking a new home in another part of the world, as far as possible from their enemies. To this end, they allied themselves with the Celts, probably from Mallorca, who had often served them as mercenaries.

    Various books on pre-Columbian transatlantic contacts now fill entire book shelves. Sculptures with negroid features are cited as evidence, as are world maps that include South America from a time before the area was discovered; reports from the Middle Ages of trips to large, exotic islands and lands in the far west of the Atlantic; very old archaeological discoveries of metals that do not exist in America; ten-thousand-year-old skulls with features that do not correspond to those of Native Americans; and apparently ancient stone buildings built in a European-Romanesque style.

    Giffhorn once considered all this implausible. He notes that his original interest in this research was to refute all these theories, and disprove early crossings—but then he encountered the Chachapoya.

    On one point Giffhorn’s theory is supported by other theorists of early connections: The crossing was not impossible in ancient times, at least not for the Carthaginians, who were a Phoenician sea-going people. Long before Christ, Phoenicians reached the Gulf of Guinea, and in all probability circumnavigated the Dark Continent 500 years before Chris—at least as reported by the Greek historian Herodotus.

    Peruvians call them “Gringuitos”

    Then as now, when ships venture too far off the West African coast—as Giffhorn thinks the Carthaginians did for fear of the Romans—currents and winds drive them almost inevitably toward South America. Some narrations of journeys from the early days of discovery confirm this.

    According to Giffhorn it was at first by chance—he was a documentary filmmaker in search of a species of extinct Hummingbird—that he encountered the descendants of the Chachapoya in Peru, and after many discussions with archaeologists and other historians there, learned the history of this nation. Today, Peruvians call the Chachapoya descendants “Gringuitos.”
    “Gringuita”

    “Gringuita”

    The Chachapoya culture—characterized by its stately stone buildings—developed approximately between 100 and 400 AD, according to scientific dating methods, long before the Inca made similar achievements. Nowhere, however, is there, as one would normally expect, remnants of preceding cultures. It seems as if the Chachapoya appeared from nowhere. Around this time in history, in the area north and south of the mouth of the Amazon, there suddenly emerged a previously unexplained culture. Ceramics give evidence for this, as does evidence of cremation, which was unknown in all of Latin America, but known in Europe.

    For Giffhorn, the most likely explanation is this: In the second century BC, a large fleet of hundreds of Carthaginians and Celts drifted to the area around the mouth of the Amazon. There, they found no area to settle suitable to their accustomed manner of living. For example, there were no rocks to build their usual homes. Also, having found the Amazon River, they probably hoped to find a more suitable climate further upstream.

    Round stone buildings, holes in skulls

    Gradually, probably over a period of several hundred years, they migrated 5,000 kilometers up the Amazon, to the subsequent settlement area of the Chachapoya. Nowhere along the way were they able to settle for long, because—as the first Spaniards were told—the migrants always came into conflict with belligerent, hostile Amazonian peoples.

    A number of parallels presented themselves to Giffhorn during his research. The massive stone rotundas, built without cement, resemble the buildings of the Celts on Mallorca. The type of slingshots they used, as described by the Spanish chroniclers of the conquistador era, resemble weapons that were once used on that Mediterranean island.

    The practice of “trepanation,” and the arrangement of holes drilled in the skull by the Chachapoya for brain surgery are unknown to medical historians in the rest of Latin America, but arguably were known by the Celts in Europe. Their manner of mummification in turn showed significant similarities to that of the Phoenicians.

    The most important evidence was found by genetic analysis of Chachapoya descendants. A molecular genetic research laboratory in Rotterdam reported that European blood is clearly detectable in this Andean nation. It appears that male Europeans bred with Indian women a long time ago.

    Kelts and the Chachapoya kept the skulls of enemies that they had defeated in battle and then publicly displayed these skulls in and around their homes and other buildings. Moreover, both the Kelts and the Chachapoya customarily drilled holes in these skulls using an unusual technique requiring the use of conical drills.

    Secondly, both the Chachapoya of Peru and the Kelts of ancient Spain customarily built round buildings out of stone rather than rectangular or square buildings out of wood, as was the custom throughout most of pre-Columbian South America. Separate teams of archeologists have reconstructed both sets of round stone buildings, and, as is obvious even from their photographs in Professor Giffhorn’s book, they are almost identical, in spite of the fact that the European and South American teams of archeologists were unaware of each other until after they had completed their reconstructions.

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/05/christopher-condon/ancient-european-city/

    White people used to make up 30% of the worlds population but now we make up just 8% and falling. Millions of non-whites are being flooded into every white majority country and assimilated with ‘Multicultural’ programs.

    There will still be a billion Africans in Africa, a billion Indians in India and 2 billion Asians in Asia. How long will it take for white children to be made extinct for ever? ‘Multiculturalism’ is just a code word for White Genocide.

  2. https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas/stone-head-guatemala-history-wants-forget-001104

    https://www.ancient-origins.net/sites/default/files/field/image/guatemala-stone-head_0.jpg

    uncovered. The face had fine features, thin lips and large nose and its face was directed up at the sky. Unusually, the face demonstrated Caucasian features which were not consistent with any of the pre-Hispanic races of America. The discovery rapidly attracted attention, but just as quickly it slipped away into the pages of forgotten history.

    News of the discovery first emerged when Dr Oscar Rafael Padilla Lara, a doctor of philosophy, lawyer and notary, received a photograph of the head in 1987 along with a description that the photograph was taken in the 1950s by the owner of the land where the head was found and that it was located “somewhere in the jungles of Guatemala”.

    The photograph and story was printed in a small article in the newsletter ‘Ancient Skies’, which was picked up and read by well-known explorer and author David Hatcher Childress , one of our guest authors at Ancient-Origins.net, who sought out to discover more about the mysterious stone head. He tracked down Dr Padilla who reported that he found the owners of the property, the Biener family, on which the monolith was found. The site was 10 kilometres from a small village in La Democracia in the south of Guatemala.

    However, Dr Padilla said that he was in despair when he reached the site and found that the site had been obliterated: “It was destroyed by revolutionaries about ten years ago. We had located the statue too late. It was used as target practice by anti-government rebels.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*