With 5-O all around, he still goes after an armed white cop — with a machete. This being California, the intimidated white cop retreats instead of shooting him dead, and instead ends up almost dead himself. Thanks, Jews.
Video: Seconds from death, officer neutralizes machete-wielding attacker at the last moment
.
.
…..See also
Young Black tries to rape 99-year-old woman in San Francisco, claims she wanted him
.
.
.
Solving the Jewish Question
by Dr. Achim Gercke
As a result of the victory of the National Socialist revolution, the Jewish Question has become a problem for those who never before thought about solving the Jewish Question, who never fought to solve it. Everyone has seen that the current situation is intolerable. Allowing free development and equality for the Jews has led to an “unfree” situation of exploited competition, and to a handing over of important positions within the German people to those of a foreign race.
The result is that anyone who thinks about this question looks for a solution. Everyone has a proposal on his desk, which gets a more or less favorable reaction in discussions. That was to be expected.
But the solution to so important a problem is not as easy as is often supposed.
The legal measures that have just been issued by the government are cleansing actions that adroitly respond to Judah’s declaration of war. Primarily, the laws provide a direction in which to move. One should not underestimate the significance of these laws. The entire people will be educated about the Jewish Question and will come to understand that a people’s community is a community of blood. For the first time, they will be reached by racial thinking and will be focused not on theoretical solutions to the Jewish Question, but rather on a real solution.
Nevertheless, these temporary measures cannot be a final solution to the Jewish Question since the time is not yet ripe, although the laws point out the direction and leave room for any future developments.
It would, however, be too early to work out plans for public discussion which propose to do more than can currently be done. Nonetheless, a few principles must be laid out so that the plans one makes can mature and mistakes can be avoided.
Fundamentally, one must decide whether or not to bring the Jews in Germany (as well as those of Jewish descent) together organizationally. Many plans announced so far propose to bring the Jews together in a federation so that they can be kept under watch and influenced. All of these proposals are fundamentally in error. Were one to establish a federation of the Jews, whether under some kind of Jewish overseer or in some sort of federation or other innocent-looking structure, the Jews would have an eternal legal anchor in Germany, a way to present their wishes, a tool for their goals, a legal way to secure secret links. And one would give at least the impression that one was dealing with a national minority that could seek, and would find, support outside Germany. One may not give even the superficial appearance of supporting such an attitude toward the Jewish Question, as it would be politically insane to confound domestic German measures on the Jewish Question with foreign policy questions.
All proposals that include a permanent presence, a permanent regulation of the Jews in Germany, do not solve the Jewish Question, for they do not eliminate the Jews from Germany (denn sie lösen die Juden nicht von Deutschland). And that is what we want to do. If the Jews are able to exploit their host peoples forever, they will remain a constant source of the open, destructive flame of Bolshevism, making it easy to repeatedly kindle it again, not to mention the political uncertainties resulting from disunity within the people and the danger to racial unity. Let us swear off such thinking forever, whether it results from poor thinking or evil intentions. To summarize, the state can and must focus on systematical elimination, on emigration.
If we destroy any organizational cooperation of the Jews and expel the dangerous, subversive Jewish agitators who show any signs of conspiratorial activities, the Jews will still have the synagogue, the rabbi, to shield them. If we support Zionist plans and attempt an international solution by establishing a homeland for the Jews, we will be able to solve the Jewish Question not only in Germany, but in Europe and the entire world. The entire world has an interest in such a solution, on eliminating this source of disorder, which constantly proceeds from Bolshevism. We must establish that clearly.
Perhaps the Jews will be able to become a nation, a people. That would require that Jewish workers, craftsmen, and settlers would develop from the Jewish population. If we regulate this plan, they we will create new foundations for such a settlement. Scattering the Jews to the four winds does not solve the Jewish Question, but rather makes it worse. A systematic program of settlement, therefore, is the best solution.
Plans and programs must have a goal pointing to the future. They may not be focused only on a temporarily unpleasant situation. A better future demands the systematic solution of the Jewish Question, not the organization of the Jews.
We must build our state without the Jews. They can be only stateless foreigners among us, with no legal permanent standing. Only so will Ahasver [the legendary wandering Jew] be forced to take up his walking stick again, and then turn it into axes and spades.
The End of Jewish Migration
by Dr. Johann von Leers
The Jewish problem is a migrating problem that has moved over the centuries from one European region to another. One can speak of a certain degree of saturation with the Jewish population in individual regions. If this degree of saturation is reached or exceeded, the affected Gentile peoples always take the same defensive measures. They attempt to reduce Jewish influence, to hinder Jewish corruption of their cultural and business life, or to reverse it if it has already occurred. Often, the first step is a clear realization that the Jews are a foreign element. Those countries not simultaneously affected by the problem tend to misunderstand these defensive measures, and as far as it is in their political interests, or to the extent that they are under Jewish influence, speak of “barbarism.” When the emigrating Jewish masses show up by them, the whole course of events often repeats itself. Similar defensive measures appear in the second country, while in the first country the fighting spirit against the Jews has calmed down — and thus the misunderstandings continue.
No one who understands the situation will be able to deny that the cause of these defensive measures lies primarily in the Jewish people itself. Even with the greatest degree of impartiality, one will conclude that one is dealing with a group of people that is on average highly unpleasant. That may not stop one from looking at the question clearly.
It is questionable to even speak of a “Jewish people,” since there is only a limited and widely varied sense of real consciousness of being a people. There is a continuum ranging from the most convinced Zionists down to assimilated Jews, so that it is better to speak of Jewry as a group of humans in which there is a strong drive to establish a genuine people. Given the extent of Jewish migration, there are two things one must keep in mind. First, it is wrong to see Jewry as an already existing people, and thus treat them as one would treat an ethnic minority. Second, if one is to seriously solve the problem, one must take into account Jewry’s inner drive to built its own people.
Based on these reasons, mature reflection shows that it is a mistake to take those Jews in a given country and bring them all together in a special federation, regardless of whether they are orthodox, assimilated, or of mixed race, not with the possibility and goal of building a people, but rather to establish a legal minority with rights within a state of a Gentile people. The goal is always for Jews to build their own people, and to separate them from a Gentile people. Therefore, one must not promote individual Jews as minority citizens, or some such status, within a Gentile people, but rather move Jews out to build their own people.
From century to century, Europe has always had outbursts of anti-Semitism, and from good and justified desires to defend Gentile peoples against an indigestible Jewry. We cannot, therefore, be satisfied with a solution that simply moves the Jews from one country to another over the centuries. This can only strengthen the dangerous Jewish ability to carry on its policies within states, building transnational power. Furthermore, there always remain strong Jewish groups, the result of race mixing and assimilation within the respective peoples, which increase racial decline.
Instead, one must find an affirmative solution that frees Europe of wandering Jewish masses. This is not a matter of small numbers, as statistics demonstrate. According to the Zeitschrift für Demokratie (sic) und Statistik der Juden (Berlin), there were around 15 million Jews in the world at the end of 1931. There were 9.8 million in Europe, of whom 3.1 million were in Poland, 3.0 million in Rumania, 0.6 million in Germany, 0.5 million in Hungary, and 0.4 million in Czechoslovakia. Since these figures include only Jews by religious confession, these figures are probably low. Even those numbers, however, include millions of so-called “bums” (Luftmenschen), impoverished peddlers and Eastern European tradesmen, population groups that are ready whenever the borders open to leave their Polish and Lithuanian ghettos and flood into Europe. As long as the pressure from these Jewish millions exists the Jewish Question in Europe will not be resolved, but rather will necessarily continue.
Even if a political movement and a people have had the worst experiences with Jewry, it could contradict the German Nordic sense of history to see a negative solution as the way to defend against the Jewish masses. Instead, the entirety of our historical mission demands a grand and comprehensive approach that that will also appeal to the opponent.
What gives some justification to Zionism’s goals is not that they are often either excessively romantic or a peculiar kind of advertising for its thinking (as the old Jewish joke has it: “What is a Zionist? A Jew who wants money from a second Jew so that a third Jew can go to Palestine.”), but rather its claim that there is a question with regards to a Jewish people, and that it must be resolved. Zionism assumes that it can build a new Jewish people from the many Jewish individuals. It has, however, some justice in demanding a territorial foundation for its development.
Palestine is unable to absorb the coming Jewish masses since it cannot support them, nor is it the right location. Furthermore, England has to consider both the native Arabic population and the world-wide Islamic community, which makes it impossible to settle even a reasonably significant part of the Jewish masses there.
Only a barbarian standing outside of the last great divine manifestation of world history would propose a general anti-Semitic battle aimed at the extermination of this people. The goal of the highly developed peoples is not to promote hatred where there is a decent way to solve the problem.
The only imaginable, positive solution that will finally resolve the Jewish problem in Europe and at the same time provide the real possibility of becoming a people, of becoming rooted to land, and even perhaps allowing its less valuable elements to be influenced by the more valuable elements, is a healthy region outside Europe. The Dutchman von Dinghene, in his book Vollzionismus, has proposed the island of Madagascar, but one could also imagine certain other suitable African or South American regions. On the one hand, such a settlement area must give the Jewish people a space where they can work productively, within the framework of providing space for peoples who now lack space. On the other hand, in those countries where the Jews are being separated from the Gentile population, the Jews will lose a large number of jobs. They must today be trained in work groups, receiving education in practical skills and agriculture so that they will be prepared to settle in this area. Those major Western European colonial powers, who are always worked up about the Jewish Question and its effects in Eastern and Central Europe, without however really seeing the connections, would perform a work not only of humanity, but also statesmanlike wisdom that would bring peace to the world and the solution of one of its most serious problems were they to make such a settlement area available. That would not only relieve Europe of the Jewish problem, but also enable Jewry to become a people.
Of course, there is a danger that such a Jewish settlement area would become a world-famous El Dorado of criminality, given the deep moral decay of a large part of Jewry. There will have to be a force to provide just and honest supervision. This would also be possible, and details could be worked out. The danger may not hinder a broad solution of the Jewish Question by resettling Jewry to an appropriate settlement area outside of Europe. We propose this to the world: Give Ahasver a homeland, as far as possible from us, but sufficient and attractive. If he makes of it a garden he may keep it and will be protected. If, however, he makes of it a den of thieves, then one will keep him there. However, we must attempt a decent solution to this question. Those Jews who for centuries have recognized the battle of the Jewish Question are called to contribute to a real solution, those Jews who recognize that the dream of Jewish world domination has failed, and who are therefore ready to become a people among peoples. Those peoples among whom the question burns the hottest because of the Jewish masses among them area also called, particularly the major Western European colonial powers with vast possessions, for it cannot be permitted that a decent solution be prevented by cheap humanitarian slogans. With a single blow the Jewish question, which has always surfaced, can be resolved.
More interesting books and speeches:
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/
The Jewish Question provides the key to understanding the conflicts and tensions that led to the current war. The majority of the German people who lack the proper relationship to the demands of the present have a limited knowledge of the Jewish Question. The task of a discussion evening is to influence this situation through lively discussion. What follows is a line of thinking with numerous vivid examples that will support such educational discussions.
We can only live according to our nature, or we will collapse. This law apples to all forms of life, for all people, also for the Jews. If they cannot live consistent with their nature, they must perish.
I. The Law of the Parasite.
In nature, there are creatures that can only live at the expense of hosts, from the lives of other creatures:
Grapevine and vine louse — without a grapevine, it perishes.
A tree and mistletoe — without a tree to support it, no mistletoe.
One has to accept this law. One cannot change it. Pity, brotherly love, and forgiveness are useless. There are no good or bad parasites, decent or indecent parasites (lice!). The parasite always creeps up looking harmless, innocent, as if it belonged there. It is often attractive. It acts as an infection. A small cut, swelling, an abscess, poisoning, the destruction of the whole body. The infested body grows weak, sleepy, it resists no longer, produces no antibodies. The doctor notices, gives injections Perhaps it is still not too late.
It is interesting that the parasite can successfully attack only weakened victims. No healthy tree has mistletoe.
The Jew is the parasite among humans.
That is the natural law. He can not do differently. He needs a host people to be able to live himself.
This way of living is innate to the Jews, and laid down in their laws:
Citation from the Talmud: “Robbing Gentiles is permitted.”
Zionist Leader Maurice Samuels: “We Jews are destroyers and will always remain so.”
Samuel Roth in Jess must life [sic]: “We have to have been a fruitful people from the beginning, but our main vice was the same then as now: parasitism. We are a miserly people who live from the labor and generosity of the rest of the world.”
If a host people at the moment of its most desperate need draws on its own strength and shakes off the parasite, and makes itself forever immune to its return, the parasite must seek a new host people, or if none can be found, hinder the weakest or the most important in its attempt to develop its nature.
The Jew cannot tolerate a people that is free of the Jews.
If a host people shakes off the parasites and develops such strength that this purified people is admired in the whole world, there is the danger that all the host peoples will recognize the parasites as deadly foes and attempt to shake them off.
At this point, the parasite will use all the resources at its command to destroy such an exemplary people (slander, accusations that it is hostile to culture or to humanity, praising the peoples obedient to the Jews as the protectors of freedom, human dignity, etc.).
II. The present world situation.
Judah must destroy Germany if it is itself to survive. In National Socialism, the German people has once again found its original way of life. It is again on the path to health and therefore offers the Jewish parasite no further nourishment (only sick creatures are susceptible).
This explains the Jewish demand:
“In the Gentile world, it is a matter of destroying a strong, organically intolerable form of life.” (Kurt Blumemfeld, Jüd. Rundschau, Nr. 39/40.)
The goal of the war of hate is to make healthy Germany susceptible once again.
For the first time in our history, the expulsion of the Jews was bound to the health of the national body (the unity of the people, the people’s community). National Socialism is the wellspring of health for our people. (Healthy creatures are not susceptible.)
The Jewish War.
The Jews must therefore either make us sick or wipe us out.
“The reason for this war has never been as clear as it is now. It is a struggle of the Jewish conception of life against the Gentile conception of life. It is the life style of the Jews against the life style of the enemies of the Jews. That is what one is fighting for throughout the world in this war.” (The American Hebrew, New York, 20.12.1942)
The war is therefore the struggle for life against illness or death.
III. Judah’s crimes across the world.
Judah hates us, because we do not let ourselves be devoured as it has so far devoured all the other peoples.
The Egyptians — Joseph the exploiter, grain speculator, finance minister. Plagues follow.
Moses led the thieves to new and pleasant pastures. After the “promised land” has been “grazed out,” it is the turn of the Persians. — The Old Testament — The Book of Esther, Purim. After their destruction, it is the turn of the Greek world. The rule of the world passes to Rome, and the Jews follow. Two thousand years later, the Jews are still boasting of their destructive work.
Lion Feuchtwanger writes in his novel Jewish War or Joseph:
“Haughty Rome was ripe for the older culture from the East, as it had been ripe 150 years before for the culture of Greece. It collapsed internally from the culture of the East. To contribute to that was exciting, it was a splendid occupation.” (p. 28)
“A damned friendly wind was blowing for the Jews. They sat in the financial administration. In the last three years alone, 22 joined the ranks of the nobility. They press onto the state, into literature. Does not one see how they undermine the Reich?” (p. 64).
After the Eastern and Western Goths had been devoured, Judah landed in the Kingdom of the Franks. As the center of Europe moved west, the Jews immediately went to Spain and Portugal. There they had the best of the exploitation of newly discovered America. As Spain and Portugal were devoured and collapsed, Judah moved on to Holland (diamond cutting). After its decline, they went on to France (Voltaire: “…the biggest scoundrels on earth”) and especially England. Consider their spiritual relationship to Puritanism, the teaching that wealth is a sign of God’s favor. Jews and Englishmen quoted the Bible in the same way. After the World War, Judah moved its world plundering headquarters to America.
In Germany, they were repeatedly branded and driven out. They always understood how to sneak back in again, until after 1918 they were able to make of Germany their most desirable, fattest morsel, and W. Rathenau, the Asian monstrosity, ruled Germany and our fatherland became a Jewish republic.
IV. The Secret of our Rescue.
Adolf Hitler brings salvation from the Jews not in a negative sense, but rather in the total return to health of our people’s body. He uncovers Jewish methods of betrayal, uncovers the parasitic principle of concealment.
We Jews are people too, we are all equal.
In the Talmud, Tractate Sanhedren records:
“The emperor spoke to Rabbi Tanschun: Come, we should all become one people. He answered: Good, but since we who have been circumcised cannot become like you, you therefore must be circumcised and become like us.”
The equality of all is only a deceptive maneuver.
The Jew never exercises his power in the open, but always through a puppet Goy. (Prefers to be the second in command as secretary. The Goy has the public responsibility.). He never fights for his interests, but always for human ideals or the interests of the struggling peoples.
England fought in Palestine during the World War to secure its land bridge to India, and the Jews got Palestine. The Jews sacrificed themselves for the English commercial interests that were endangered by Germany, and gained Germany to exploit. Today, England and America are not fighting for world domination, but rather for democracy and human dignity. Moscow is fighting for the Russian worker. No, the Jew has never fought for himself, he always lets others fight for him! (from outward appearances!)
Our firm attitude comes from a knowledge of the Jews.
There are still those of our people who are not entirely comfortable when we speak of the extermination of the Jews on our territory. We needed the strengths of character and action of the greatest man of our people in a thousand years to rip the Jewish blindfold from our eyes.
The Jewish blindfold of “socialism”
— the greatest betrayal of all times —
The path to world domination.
The Jewish principle of “the equality of all those with a human face” was enthroned in 1789. All people are equal, only individuals. The Jewish principle was that of unrestrained individualism. In every “open competition,” he was the victor, since he was by nature the most self-centered. That was the epitome of justice. All could operate from self interest. He who did not was stupid. After the first enthusiasm had passed, people realized that thousands and thousands were not equal to the race, and they were named proletarians. But the Jews had a way out for them too, their “socialism” in Marxist clothing.
Jewish plutocracy and Jewish communism are after the German people who have escaped their slavery.
V. The battle to the end.
The Jew wants to force us back to a life of slavery so that he can live off us as a parasite and suck us dry. The healthy life of our people stands against the parasitic life of the Jew.
Who in this struggle can still speak of pity, brotherly love, etc.? Who believes that a parasite (e.g., a louse) can be improved or changed? Who believes that one can come to an agreement with a parasite? We can only choose between being devoured by the parasite or destroying it.
The Jew must be destroyed wherever we meet him!
In so doing, we commit no crime against life, but rather serve life’s laws of battle, which always oppose that which is an enemy to healthy life. Our battle serves to maintain life.
A German victory — the victory of the created order.
The faith of Esau:
According to the Thora, the white race is Amalek (children of Esau) and shall be destroyed to the last drop by the jews (Jacob). Jacob the son of Isaac deceived his father and his brother Esau for the blessing and the right of the first born. The thing is, Esau did not give up so easily and got a blessing from his father aswell:
Genesis 27
39 His father Isaac answered him,
“Your dwelling will be
away from the earth’s richness,
away from the dew of heaven above.
40
You will live by the sword
and you will serve your brother.
But when you grow restless,
you will throw his yoke
from off your neck.”
When we demand this birthright and proclaim it, the jews can and will not destroy us, because otherwise they would draw the wrath of JHWH (their god) onto themself and would get destroyed! Therefore We (Esau/Amalek/the white race) must expose our deceitful brother (Jacob/the jews) wherever we can, proclaim our birthright, and be able to defend ourself “live by the sword” until we are able to ” throw his yoke from off (y)our neck”. We must be able to defend ourself against the minions of the jews who attack us. Otherwise we must expose the jews and demand our birthright!
Here is the story from the Thora/Bible/Pentateuch:
21 Isaac prayed to the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was childless. The Lord answered his prayer, and his wife Rebekah became pregnant. 22 The babies jostled each other within her, and she said, “Why is this happening to me?” So she went to inquire of the Lord.
23 The Lord said to her,
“Two nations are in your womb,
and two peoples from within you will be separated;
one people will be stronger than the other,
and the older will serve the younger.”
24 When the time came for her to give birth, there were twin boys in her womb. 25 The first to come out was red, and his whole body was like a hairy garment; so they named him Esau.[b] 26 After this, his brother came out, with his hand grasping Esau’s heel; so he was named Jacob.[c] Isaac was sixty years old when Rebekah gave birth to them.
(…)
19 Jacob said to his father, “I am Esau your firstborn. I have done as you told me. Please sit up and eat some of my game, so that you may give me your blessing.”
20 Isaac asked his son, “How did you find it so quickly, my son?”
“The Lord your God gave me success,” he replied.
21 Then Isaac said to Jacob, “Come near so I can touch you, my son, to know whether you really are my son Esau or not.”
22 Jacob went close to his father Isaac, who touched him and said, “The voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of Esau.” 23 He did not recognize him, for his hands were hairy like those of his brother Esau; so he proceeded to bless him. 24 “Are you really my son Esau?” he asked.
“I am,” he replied.
25 Then he said, “My son, bring me some of your game to eat, so that I may give you my blessing.”
(…)
30 After Isaac finished blessing him, and Jacob had scarcely left his father’s presence, his brother Esau came in from hunting. 31 He too prepared some tasty food and brought it to his father. Then he said to him, “My father, please sit up and eat some of my game, so that you may give me your blessing.”
32 His father Isaac asked him, “Who are you?”
“I am your son,” he answered, “your firstborn, Esau.”
33 Isaac trembled violently and said, “Who was it, then, that hunted game and brought it to me? I ate it just before you came and I blessed him—and indeed he will be blessed!”
34 When Esau heard his father’s words, he burst out with a loud and bitter cry and said to his father, “Bless me—me too, my father!”
35 But he said, “Your brother came deceitfully and took your blessing.”
36 Esau said, “Isn’t he rightly named Jacob[a]? This is the second time he has taken advantage of me: He took my birthright, and now he’s taken my blessing!” Then he asked, “Haven’t you reserved any blessing for me?”
37 Isaac answered Esau, “I have made him lord over you and have made all his relatives his servants, and I have sustained him with grain and new wine. So what can I possibly do for you, my son?”
38 Esau said to his father, “Do you have only one blessing, my father? Bless me too, my father!” Then Esau wept aloud.
39 His father Isaac answered him,
“Your dwelling will be
away from the earth’s richness,
away from the dew of heaven above.
40
You will live by the sword
and you will serve your brother.
But when you grow restless,
you will throw his yoke
from off your neck.”
This story is not just a story, it is a holy mission to fulfill, if we the aryan race want to exist in the future. We must show god, that we take his blessing serious and do whatever we can to preserve ourself. This goes in accordance to the 14 words:
“We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children,” or the less commonly used “Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.”
Thank you very much, comrade.
This being in the Old Testament, which I view as an enemy book, I can only interpret it as a warning by the early Habiru to the later Jews of the inside elite that their once-gullible, “blue-eyed” white victims may one day get their act together — and wreak terrible revenge.