FRANÇOIS AROUET TV star killed by “teens” and pandemic levels of white “naivety” in Dallas suburb – Take a wild guess which “demographic” was behind this shooting.

by Johndenugent.com contributing editor, François Arouet

Last week I was bombarded with the usual doom-and-gloom news in my MSN feed (this is now a common theme in my op-eds). Commander-in-thief Biden appoints yet another Deep State warmonger to his cabinet, Big Tech launches more cancel culture attacks against conservative dissenters etc. Those were just some of the stories I encountered.

.

Dolefully, it’s all par for the course at this juncture.

.

Although almost all of the news was negative, I carried on looking for something – ANYTHING with a drop of positivity to distract me from the soul-destroying evil spewing from the mainstream news cycle.

.

I was sadly unsuccessful.

.

Things are genuinely that bad at this point.

.

Even a fluff piece about Sea World, presumably published in some Left wing rag that’s been given access to my feed, immediately morphed into an unhinged diatribe about plastic straws, the “rights of whales” and the abuse the latest incarnation of Shamu is being subjected to by his “white” trainers….. trainers that feed the majestic creature fish by hand, kiss his snout when he looks attentively at them — genuine people who cater to his every need and provide him with better medical care than we can even dream of!

.

There was no mention of the Japanese and Chinese whaling industries, nor the “native” Americans (they are about as indigenous to these lands as we are) living in the US and Canada that have decimated native whale populations in recent years.

.

Just like Greta Thunberg has no interest confronting China and India about their refusal to lower their emissions, this vile woman had no interest in tackling actual behaviors harming whales.

.

Then there was the sports!

.

Masks, Covid Protocol, even Colin Kaepernick was back in the news giving us his esteemed opinion on still something else he has absolutely no clue about.

.

Gone were the good ol’ days of Tom Brady giving interviews about his daily rituals and preparations – with his MAGA hat sitting proudly in his stall.

 .

If the NFL had its way and weren’t making so much money off the residual interest the few remaining NFL fans have in Tom Brady, they’d have cancelled him long ago as well and replaced him with a black transgender quarterback with BLM tattooed on his surgically installed scrotum.

.

It was though at this point that I stumbled across a truly shocking story about a 30-year-old actor who had been gunned down outside his girlfriend’s house. It was during an attempted robbery and carjacking in a Dallas suburb in early November. The actor, who was white, was featured smiling on the red carpet of some awards show, yet the title read something to the effect of, “Funeral held for actor killed in botched robbery”.

.

There was talk about his wake and the grief his family and friends experienced in the weeks following his murder in the photo’s caption.

.

Although I didn’t recognize the actor, I felt compelled to read on – not because this sort of thing interests me ordinarily, but because something told me I NEEDED to see if I was right about the race of the perpetrators.

.

Again, another theme I find myself returning to over and over and over again. Not just in my head, but via my writing on johndenugent.com .

.

The Daily Mail reported that on November 2nd, only a few hours before polls would open in the most important election in our nation’s history,

“Actor Eddie Hassell, who was the star of the NBC show ‘Surface’, was fatally shot in a suspected carjacking in Texas. The 30-year-old actor was shot in the stomach just before 2 am outside his girlfriend’s apartment in Grand Prairie, near Dallas.

.

Police responding to reports of the shooting gave Hassell CPR at the scene before he was transported to hospital.

.

He later died of his injuries.”

.

As the police had no leads at this juncture, there was next to nothing else anywhere to be found – apart from a series of photos showing the actor plying his trade on TV – as well as a selection of pics taken from his Instagram account.

.

There was mary a word about the perps – no police sketches, video footage, names, nor was there any mention of the perpetrator’s appearance, race, possible motive(s), or at what stage the police were in their investigation.

.

But I knew all I needed to know.

.

Carjacking.

.

Murder.

.

Dallas.

.

White victim.

.

The proverbial writing was on the wall for me.

.

Anyone who chooses to recognize and accept universal truth – however inconvenient it may be – will know that nine times out of ten the perp’s going to be black.

.

While the media berates us incessantly about non-existent racially motivated transgressions, even “micro-aggressions,” for God’s sake, that are supposedly experienced by blacks at the hands of whites – and the Blacks Loot and Murder (BLM) mob cry foul each time one of their own gets shot for being a genuine criminal monster, we all know the clear and present danger these feral bipeds pose to anyone that crosses their path..

We know that when ANYONE of pretty much any race is carjacked, the perp’s gonna be a nog. Of course this is NOT always the case.

One need only look at the perps that killed Michael Jordan’s dad as he napped by the side of the highway in his Lexus to know that degenerates of all races are capable of evil.

However, in the vast majority of car-jackings, the perps are black. (At johndenugent.com we call out all scum, regardless of their racial and ethnic background.)

Fast forward to this morning, when, after speaking to John on SKYPE, I again thought about young Mr Hassell, and wondered if the police had caught the perps.

So I did a bit of digging that validated the reasoned prejudices I harbor for these people…

.

I’ll continue my commentary below the following shameful softball article from Fox 4 News in Dallas, in a Texas that once fought in the Confederacy and was full of rough- and-tough cowboys….

.

.

In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General’s Office.

There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns, and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.

It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several Parliaments ahead.

The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: “How can its dimensions be reduced?”

The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow.

“Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.” We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.

In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.

I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.

Hence the urgency now of the encouragement of re-emigration.

Nobody can estimate the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.

Even immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.

The third element of the Conservative Party’s policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. We will have no “first-class citizens” and “second-class citizens.” This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendent should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another.

The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.

This is why to enact legislation of the kind before Parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match onto gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they “know not what they do.” [a quote from Jesus, dying in the Cross]

The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service.

But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For they found themselves made strangers in their own country.

They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted.

The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.

I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:

“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton, a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story.

She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house.

She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age.

Then the immigrants moved in.

With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.

“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her ‘phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused.

“When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning pickaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. “Racialist,” they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison.”

The other dangerous delusion is summed up in the word “integration.” To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.

There are among the Commonwealth immigrants many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.

But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.

We are on the verge here of a change.

Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population.

The words I am about to use, are those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:

‘The Sikh communities’ campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. ‘

All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.

The immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant have provided.

As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see

“the River Tiber foaming with much blood.”

Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.

[Send of Powell speech]

How far we have fallen…. 🙁 One need only look at how interviews were conducted…the politeness, the civilization, the choice vocabulary used (not that of a third-grader), and the lack of snarky abuse, even when there was definite disagreement. Can you see the differences, too? What, or who, took us down to the jungle?