I sUSpect this white businessman had had it witH this woman for a while. Her insistence he call her “Dr” was just the final straw.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/north-carolina-city-council-fired-151907494.html
What can be more negro than to demand respect without earning it?
THAT is the new BLACK privilege.
.
Two black female teachers go at it in front of their pupils:
.
….On “Dr” Martin Luther King
The Inmates Have Taken Over the Asylum:
Combating Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck’s Insane Martin Luther King Cult with Documentary Truth
by Michael Hoffman | www.RevisionistHistory.org
Copyright©2010. All Rights Reserved
“Look around you. You’re not alone. You are Americans! You have the same steel spine and the moral courage of Washington and Lincoln and Martin Luther King. It is in you. It will sustain you as it sustained them.” — -Sarah Palin at Glenn Beck’s rally, Washington D.C., Aug. 28, 2010
“Mr. Beck read Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address and quoted from Martin Luther King.” –Wall Street Journal
The double-minded Mrs. Palin told the huge crowd at Mr. Beck’s rally to honor America’s combat veterans even while she was honoring King, the man who said that America
“had committed more war crimes than any nation in the world.”
The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled “Life is What You Make It,” according to the testimony of King’s best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams.
The first book that King wrote, Stride Toward Freedom, was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.
And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff included King’s widow Coretta), stated of King’s writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary (located in Upland, Pennsylvania):
“Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism…. Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology.”
King’s essay, “The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,” written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of The Finding of God, who had once taught at Boston University himself.
Another of King’s theses, “Contemporary Continental Theology,” written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton.
King’s doctoral dissertation, “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,” for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD. dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, “The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich’s Concept of God.”
***
Jack Boozer
Professor of Religion
source: https://emoryhistory.emory.edu/facts-figures/people/makers-history/profiles/boozer.html
As Charles Howard Candler Professor of Religion for more than thirty-five years, Jack Boozer was an Emory legend beloved by generations of students.
An award-winning teacher of Christian theology, Boozer was active in racially integrating the University and advocated aggressively for Emory’s emerging ethical and academic leadership. He was instrumental in establishing the Jay and Leslie Cohen Chair of Judaic Studies, University Worship, and the ethics program in the School of Medicine. Boozer was an ardent supporter of the arts on campus, as well as one of Emory’s early teachers and scholars of the Holocaust.
He received Emory’s highest faculty honor, the Thomas Jefferson Award, and the Emory Williams Awards for teaching.
***
LOL!
Jefferson on the Blacks
Jefferson on the jews
***
According to The Martin Luther King Papers, in King’s PhD. dissertation “only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or more words that were King’s own….”!
***
https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/publications/king-papers
***
In The Journal of American History, June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a Leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating.
(“King’s Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation,” The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87)
The plagiarizing pair. Plagiarism is simple theft.
Reading Garrow’s study, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that King cheated because he had
1) chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD. would be useful, and,
2) lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, he went after it by any means necessary.
*** JdN: “By any means necessary” was the famous phrase of Malcolm X, a convicted robber who became a black nationalist leader….
Wikipedia on Malcolm X:
By the time he was thirteen, his father had died and his mother had been committed to a mental hospital. After living in a series of foster homes, Malcolm X became involved in hustling and other criminal activities in Boston and New York. In 1946, Malcolm X was sentenced to eight to ten years in prison. While in prison, Malcolm X became a member of the Nation of Islam. After his parole in 1952, he became one of the Nation’s leaders and chief spokesmen.
How nice! 😉
***
Why, then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD?
Garrow states on page 89:
“King’s academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions… and comparisons of other’s writings.
Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King’s professors did not expect more….”
The editors of The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers state that
“…the failure of King’s teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable….”
*** JdN: No it ain’t! King was being groomed, just like Barry Soetoro, by the CIA to be a black “leader.” And he was their “fair-haired boy” (gag) until he stepped out of line over the continuation of the Vietnam War.
Then the FBI gunned him down, not because he was into mixing the black and white races — they were just fine with that and were crushing the Klan down south for him — but because after 1967 he opposed the military-industrial profit-fest and Agent Orange orgy that the Vietnam War had become — instead of the noble crusade against satanic communism that it could and should have been.
Act of State by William Pepper makes that overwhelmingly clear, factual and believable (http://www.amazon.com/Act-State-Execution-Martin-Luther/dp/1859846955).
Ray when arrested in 1968; he was pressured into confessing and then recanted, maintaining his innocence until the day he died. Ray was no angel, but a felon who was ideal to frame for the King murder since he had escaped from prison, was a white man who looked very northern European, and thus was perfect for causing a white guilt trip. Those scummy Aryans….gunning down a man of God…..
***
Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King’s vision, purposely covered up his cheating for decades. From the New York Times of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that,
“There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation.”
However, despite its finding, the committee said that:
“No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree,” an action the panel said “would serve no purpose.”
*** JdN: How could they not gag at still calling him “DOCTOR” King?
***
No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud as a student, the “reverend” and the “doctor” should be removed from King’s name.
Shortly before the King Holiday was shamefully signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1983, Governor Meldrim Thompson of New Hampshire wrote a letter to Reagan expressing concerns about King’s morality and Communist connections.
Mr. Reagan responded,
“I have the reservations you have, but here the perception of too many people is based on an image, not reality. Indeed, to them the perception is reality.”
With supreme cowardice, Reagan then went ahead anyway and signed the holiday into law, thereby sentencing millions of public school children to annual brainwashing concerning King’s “noble” agenda of curbing the right of property (who you will house) and the right of free association (who you will hire or serve in your business).
Thanks to Reagan, millions of American youth are taught to honor a serial adulterer who spent his last night on earth slapping around the prostitute with whom he had been consorting.
King is the man the Israeli pawns Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck e made the centerpiece of their campaign to “Restore America.”
Can you see the Talmudic hand behind this mockery? Martin Luther King radically advanced the revolutionary subversion of the Constitution of the United States.
He “restored” nothing!
.
.
…..Final comment
What Paulianity is, is the egoic mind, happy delusions, hopium and escapism.
If I as a white nationalist simply stole fifty sentences out of another man’s book and claimed them as my own, the outrage would be explosive.
But the theologian, the libtard, the leftist and the jew, are just fine with the negro King doing exactly that.
For a noble cause, of course 😉 ….. a mulatto, 90-IQ world of goy neo-slaves.
And what will the white man who was sacked do? He was sacked because he used his “white privilege,” whatever that is. Will he sue for racial discrimination? Or scuttle away and do nothing ? What would you do ? Fight or flight ? I’d get my petrol can out. Time to push back, white folks.
There was no anti-communist leadership in Vietnam. A vet told me that if they really wanted to do any real damage to the Viet Cong, they had to conduct raids during their R&R time.
Yes, tremendous corruption, and the idiot Diem, a Catholic convert, was persecuting the overwhelmingly buddhist majority!
The South Vietnameses saw us as foreign interferers, and our negro troops as an especial abomination. The did not want to see Blacks gunning down Vietnamese, even if communists.
The mixlings the negroes produced with Vietnamese whores were persecuted, ostracized and finally expelled.
Kennedy knew the war was hopeless, and would have taken us out. This decision was another nail in his coffin.
List of anomalies in the Derek Chauvin / George Floyd incident. As I initially suspected, this was yet another Masonic/ CIA-orchestrated false-flag event, designed to demonize white people in general, and cops in particular:
https://rense.com/general96/CIA-Derek-Chauvin-False-Flag.php
George Floyd’s masonic tattoo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzdVGI3HzsA
And as the above video notes, let’s not forget that Chauvin and Floyd knew each other and worked at the same nightclub. What are the odds of that?
A few more videos presenting evidence that George Floyd was a freemason:
https://iharare.com/george-floyd-a-freemason
As one of the videos above notes, George Floyd’s son was named Quincy MASON Floyd. What are the odds?