…..The cashless nightmare Biden and his jew masters plan
Total government control is only possible in a cashless society
by JdN science correspondent
Western society’s trajectory towards a digital or cashless-only payment system will result in the complete loss of what’s left of our individual freedoms.
Yes, having cash is THAT important!! Never let anyone tell you otherwise.
The opportunity gifted to the tax authority, the financial services sector and financial tech sector (ie PayPal and patreon) by the organisers of the plandemic—during which cashless and digital payment options were intentionally promoted as being safer than cash— has resulted in government having exponentially greater amounts of control of our lives.
Right now, every last digital purchase you make is recorded for analysis and potential sale to interested third parties, and most worryingly made readily available to our all-seeing government.
…. A government that targets its political enemies, and hates people like us.
Cashless options are being sold as “safe”, “clean”, “easy” and “ideal”. Even “moral”.
In reality a cashless society is a controlled society, where all transactions are monitored and all people are both tracked and surveilled. The implementation of near mandated digital currency and cashless transactions amounts to little more than a push towards a surveillance society controlled by an authoritarian technocrat class and evil political class.
*** Netanyahu laid it all out 33 years ago to fellow Mossad agents at bar in Tel Aviv, recorded by the USA DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency)
***
In spite of what Laura Ingraham tells me, I’m not so concerned about the CCP knowing my spending habits. I’ll let the Chinese public worry about those criminals. It’s our own hateful leaders who frighten me.
Not only can governments, tech firms and banks monitor what you have earned and spent in a cashless world, they can preemptively control your ability to do both just as easily. Just ask the Canadian truckers how keeping their funds in their bank accounts worked out for them when they dared to protest the authorities….
The vile International Money Fund (IMF) – a quasi governmental agency that I recently covered in an article about the IMF’S control of Ukraine openly admitted at a recent WEF meet-up in Davos that a centralised digital currency “would allow banks and governments absolute control over the rules and regulations of the use of that expression of central bank liability” while providing these institutions “the technology to enforce said authority.”
In other words the moment you give up your cash, the evil bastards will entirely own you.
Remember….the numbers in your bank account that appear on the screen when you slide your ATM card into your local cash machine, aren’t yours.
Cash and liquid assets you hold in your hands and on your person are yours, but the numbers you see on that screen at the ATM down the road are only what the bank owes you while they are solvent….and in the not so distant future, what they’ll owe you, when you’ve been a good boy or girl.
….or more frightening still, when the govt deems you’ve been a good boy or girl.
Think I’m joking?
Existing instances of banking and financial tech companies controlling your earned wealth is easily illustrated by looking at how banks treat enemies of the state.
Look at Patreon’s cancelling of various conservative media accounts, right-leaning Project Veritas having their bank accounts frozen and left-leaning Julian Assange having every penny to his name stolen from him by the State.
Heck, even old school liberal Twitter-file journalist Matt Taibbi was recently targeted by Biden’s IRS thugs for daring to speak truth to power. They did so after surveilling his bank accounts looking for evidence he was getting paid off by Elon Musk.
Obama literally imprisoned mainstream conservative pundit, and former Ronald Reagan aid, Dinesh DeSouza, for violating campaign finance rules in the most innocuous way imaginable. They nabbed him by surveilling his personal bank account for “irregularities” after he publicly embarrassed Obama in a film he had written, produced and directed.
Infamously, the soft-talking Trudeau government seized the bank accounts of people loosely associated with the peaceful ‘Freedom Convoy’ movement in Ottawa for actions as innocent as bringing protestors food and fuel.
Whether “far right”, right wing or moderately conservative, old-school liberal, left wing or truckers….it doesn’t matter.
People criticising the establishment are vulnerable. Anyone whose financial wellbeing is under complete control of the banking industry, financial tech institutions and the State is in grave danger.
I could go on and on and on….
The increasingly more prevalent practice of tech finance institutions and banks (encouraged by government) withholding cash from account holders is one of the most disempowering side effects of our technological future, and exacerbates the risk for those already vulnerable.
People like us basically….
Having your finances controlled is as emasculating and disempowering as giving up one’s kids, guns or home.
In some ways it’s worse as without money one literally starves.
I recently saw this dynamic likened to the plight of people living in abusive relationships by a friend of mine.
He posited that oftentimes the first ‘right’ seized by an abuser is his/her victim’s access to their cash.
Cash is replaced with cards which are then surveilled and controlled by the abuser. The card soon becomes the only way to pay and permission is eventually needed for even the most basic purchase.
Want a bottle of chocolate milk?
You’ll need to ask permission.
Anyone lacking a bank account, who refuses to have a ‘digital identity’ or DARES to opt out or speak up against government will be locked out of a cashless economy as a victim of a weaponised divorce is locked out of their home, bank account and kids lives.
Hold onto your cash with as firm a grip as you hold onto your kids, friends.
Along with our right to speak freely and defend ourselves, our ability to control our finances – even access our OWN money – will be the first to go.
.
…….Dutch and Norwegian cashless experiences
From VK:
…..Fed Asks Americans for Feedback on a Central Bank Digital Currency—Here Are Some Responses
Americans are worried that a U.S. Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) could end up compromising essential freedoms, further centralizing monetary policy, and making the country’s currency vulnerable to hacking, according to a recently published Fed survey.
In January last year, the Fed published a white paper on what a CBDC could look like. It asked for public comments on issues like potential risks and benefits a CBDC can have on the country. On April 20, the Fed released the responses in nine documents. Here are some of the various answers and concerns expressed by respondents, some of whom were named, others who were unnamed, as well as those whose names were redacted.
A student from Texas pointed to the breach of privacy, government overreach, and hacking as risks posed by CBDC. “With this digital currency, the government would be able to usurp freedoms without the knowledge/consent of the public.
Andrew W. from Virginia warned that centralization of monetary policies can “easily be abused and cause unintended disruption.” CBDCs can further centralize monetary policies and “only increases the risk potential.”
Hollie Bishop from Indiana cited public mistrust as her number one concern about central bank digital currencies. “People are afraid of being constantly monitored. Also, our aging and elderly population pay bills in cash and may not know how to use this system, leaving them susceptible to hunger, bills not being paid, etc.”
Power Issues, Quantum Computing Hack
Lucas Vincent from Arizona warned that power consumption is a major issue. “The power consumption that provides the means of creating said digital currency, which has caused power outages in places like Kazakhstan and even New York, is an enormous risk that puts Earth at stake because of the environmental damage that digital currency mining causes,” he said.
Andy Garcia from Georgia notes that the dependence of CBDCs on electricity makes them vulnerable. “If the long-term goal is to get rid of paper currency, relying strictly on CBDC, the entire economic system will become vulnerable and susceptible to crippling cyber-attacks. There needs to be a fallback system that would work without electricity, much like paper currency does.”
Horacio Gasquet from Texas pointed out that with the advent of quantum computing, even the most sophisticated encryption algorithms can be cracked. As such, in order for a CBDC to be “truly secure,” the digital currency should be “rooted in quantum key encryption.”
A few of the comments highlighted purported benefits of CBDCs, like faster fund transfers and providing stability in case of hyperinflation.
Should the US Follow Other Nations?
The Fed asked, “How should decisions by other large economy nations to issue CBDCs influence the decision whether the United States should do so?”
An unnamed individual answered (pdf): “It should send warning signs to our country creating a CBDC. There’s a reason China implemented a CBDC, and it’s not for efficiency.”
Aaron Olszewski from New Hampshire also said, “A shift to a CBDC is a shift to push people away from using that nation’s currency.”
Brian Marshall from Idaho replied, “The United States should first worry about following the Constitution and preserving liberty, not trying to follow other countries in their descent into tyranny. Free markets will always provide the means to exchange one currency for another.”
JC Denton from California said that other nations adopting a CBDC does not mean the United States ought to do the same.
“Our financial purpose should be to focus on our own issues. If other nations wish to perform such actions, it is their choice. We don’t need to follow a bad idea just because other groups are doing it,” said Chad Rytting from Utah.
Phil Zobrist from Illinois said that the United States was “the standard” and it can remain so if “you maintain a strong dollar.”
Many of the respondents reacted negatively to the idea of the United States following other countries in adopting financial systems. A small minority voiced support for a CBDC, stating a goal of catching up to other nations.
The US Constitution
Many responses (pdf) to the Fed survey mentioned how the idea of a CBDC was antithetical to the U.S. Constitution.
When the Fed asked, “Should a CBDC be designed to maximize ease of use and acceptance at the point of sale?” Lawrence Raymond from Maryland replied, “No, because all transactions would become public, which goes against the freedoms outlined in the Constitution.”
When the Fed asked, “Could some or all of the potential benefits of a CBDC be better achieved in a different way?” Richard Hay from Texas said, “Yes, return to the constitutional definition of money, which is gold and silver.
“Fiat currencies continue to destroy the poor and middle class by endless expansion of debt and the money supply destroying the value of wages and savings of the vast majority of the population while enriching the owners of assets by driving asset prices higher via inflationary pressures caused by the expansion of credit. Our founders envisioned an honest monetary system.”
Hay added, “The CBDC would eventually be weaponized against political opponents and groups of people that differ from the beliefs of a centralized control governing system.”
Rodger Reed from California said: “Our economy must remain a function of the constitutional mandate created by the founders. By design, a CBDC does not serve the American people the way sound money does.”
When the Fed asked, “What additional potential benefits, policy considerations, or risks of a CBDC may exist that have not been raised in this paper?” Charles Dowling from Colorado said: “The people who are aware of reality do not respect the government whatsoever. And would probably not use your CBDC. And no one wants an illegal, unconstitutional government poking into their business.”
Privacy Concerns
During a recent speech in Washington, Federal Reserve Governor Michelle W. Bowman admitted that “safeguarding privacy is a top concern” with regard to the use of CBDCs. Bowman wants CBDCs to have enough protections to safeguard the privacy of customers and businesses while also being transparent enough to deter criminal activity.
“In thinking about the implications of CBDC and privacy, we must also consider the central role that money plays in our daily lives, and the risk that a CBDC would provide not only a window into but potentially an impediment to, the freedom Americans enjoy in choosing how money and resources are used and invested,” said Bowman.
“So, a central consideration must be how a potential U.S. CBDC could incorporate privacy considerations into its design, and what technology and policy options could support a robust privacy framework.”
An analysis by the Cato Institute warned that CBDCs pose a foundational threat to America’s economic systems. A U.S. CBDC will eventually “usurp” the private sector and endanger the core freedoms of American citizens, it said.
As such, CBDCs should have “no place” in the American economy, the institute stated. It called on Congress to “explicitly prohibit” the Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve from issuing CBDCs in any form.
.
.
……The airhead part-negro US Vice President, Kamala Harris (married to a jew) speaking at her negro college, Howard University in Wash DC, the other day, delivers another classic:
“So I think it’s very important — as you have heard from so many incredible leaders — for us, at every moment in time, and certainly this one, to see the moment in time in which we exist and are present, and to be able to contextualize it, to understand where we exist in the history and in the moment as it relates not only to the past, but the future.”
.
.
.
…..Spiritual reading for May 7
There are many old things—maybe relationships, certainly ideas and beliefs and expectations, possibly aspirations—which are no longer of value to you. Many of you hold on because they are precisely the things that have anchored and balanced you in the past. But now, as the very foundations of what it means to be alive in form are being rebuilt, these things can have the effect of unbalancing you. They can drag you down and turn you off course.
You know what we are talking about. Some of what you accumulated growing to your current age and through many lifetimes has been relatively easy to discard. As you see something as no longer helpful, you drop it. But there are other things that hold a sweetness, a place so deep in your heart that it seems crazy to let go. Feelings or ties that gave you experiences of connection and wholeness: it is these, the ideas behind them, the people who were part of them, that are so hard to separate from.
Obviously, not all are without value, but you will know, in your center, which serve and which do not. Which help you move forward and which bind you to a beloved place in your past.
We are talking about something bittersweet. We are talking about honoring the ways, the beings with whom you shared, the times of love and compassion that are dear beyond words and yet belong to another era, another you. Does this make sense? And yet, as you honor them you may identify, you may hold them tight, you may stay ensnared by them.
And just so long as you hold onto something obsolete, no matter whether it be good or bad, that is how long you will be kept from your full freedom. Your freedom and the power of the light you can and need to hold are paramount right now. Looking back, holding yourself back, even with sweet remembrances—these are like lopping of a wing that could carry you on the wind.
Today, we would ask you to think on these things, to see what—if anything—might be holding you in another time and perspective with warmth and comfort and love. See, if you can, how you are thus served and be honest with yourself. To let go, to contemplate letting go is painful indeed.
Heartbreaking, even. Yet you need not leave the memories, only the energetic ties that twine you to anything of an older time and purpose. It is okay to remember, but unless you are certain that you are led forward by those memories, it is best to let go of any longing or any attachment to what was.
Allow yourself a full measure of sorrow. What you must process in a day or two is akin to the work of a decade a few years back. All that you do is of necessity compacted. The energies are densely held and felt. It is sometimes tempting, we see, to glide over those energies or feelings precisely because they are so dense. But when you slip across the surface you have not done yourself justice or treated your experience with respect. In fact, you will likely return to it if you have not let yourself have it whole. Remember that transformation is a process of death and rebirth, so let yourself die fully in this way.
If you find that there are ties to loosen, do it with love and tenderness for yourself. To let go of heart connection, even when it is obstructive, is to make a huge sacrifice. One that most would never consider.
Yet you are meant to fly, to carry your light and love into a new and better future. You, more than most, must be clear and open for the higher energies to move through. If you are able, try not to sever or cut your ties to that which is old but rather, let them melt. Do it gently and call upon the sun to soften and dissolve the connections which have to go. And then let the sun’s warmth fill the void.
Much is being asked of you, we know; it is asked because it is needed, you are needed.
We send you many blessings and much love. We hold your hearts in ours today and every day.
.
.
Article on Zionist scumbag Noam Chomsky:
https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/chomskys-ties-to-jeffrey-epstein-and-suspected-9-11-mastermind-ehud-barak-exposed/
Another great article.Well researched again.
On Big Brother eroding your freedoms, if you oppose it, you’re a racist, fascist nazi.
I couldn’t even pay £5 into my kid’s account. I had to pay it into my account, then transfer it electronically so as they can see where it came from, to conform to money laundering laws.
This only applies to the masses, not the elites.
The Panama papers proved how the elites stash away cash to avoid tax…ehilst the masses are quizzed over a 5er, ffs.
This is to get everyone banking online to cut the banks’ overheads and increase profits still.
With online services, a cashless society, AI and automation, millions of jobs are redundant. Possibly 100 million jobs can be automated.
But I think it will be much higher. It will happen within 10 years. Who’s going to bet with me? A fiver says it happens — cash. 😉
Thanks!
Digital currency is actually the final curtain.
Thanks!
Digutal currency is actually the final curtain.
Slowly the financial chains of slavery are slipped over the ankles and wrists.
What shit world it will be. The zionist global elites at the top of the pile. They will meet a lot of resistance and there will be a severe reaction to their plans. A large number will live by a barter system off grid. An alternative to Soros, Schwab, Rothschilds is to live off grid and self sufficient.
Russia’s former space boss correctly says there’s no proof that the Apollo astro-NOTS ever landed on the Moon, and hints at some type of technology exchange deal between the U.S. and the Soviet Union to not expose this hoax:
https://www.rt.com/russia/575937-roscosmos-rogozin-us-moon-landing-proof