Climate-change Greta silent as the grave on obesity and CO2; spiritual reading

Fiercely anti-white, obese black rapper Lizzo

 

Why is it okay for climate psychopaths to shame people for driving their SUV to and from Little League practice but not okay to shame the obese for their heightened contribution to “climate change”?

by JdN science editor

Whether or not climate change is real or actually b.s. (as I posit) is entirely irrelevant to this discourse.

Even RFK, Jr, who has been ranting about purported “climate change” for the better part of three decades, has admitted that, for the Establishment, it’s all about control, power and money.

A new study out of Kerala, India – where many of the West’s call and IT centres are based – claims that overweight people are a primary culprit in C02 production.

Sure, the average American produces two to three times more C02 compared to the average Third-Worlder, however not all Westerners contribute the same amount of C02.

Highly industrialised regions of Left-voting states such as California produce higher levels of C02 per capita than rural areas of the country, in spite of the fact that rural areas produce the vast majority of the food the country produces.

That can be attributed to industrialization of the lands, the number of cars, number of cars per square mile and number of cars per capita.

Then there is the C02 produced by people on an individual level.

Jet-setting liberals who frequent the skies and consume a greater quantity of goods and services based on their elevated incomes, tend to produce more C02 than those of us who are happy sitting on our farms, eating home-grown and locally-grown food, and who exist on a modest or minimal income.

A farm-grown tomato, piece of bread made with corn [maize] flour and regional cheddar cheese, for example, is responsible for FAR less C02 emissions than that Avocado on Ciabatta di Toscana and Peruvian Quinoa with Savoie raclette, that’s been transported from halfway around the world to satisfy the Cappuccino crowd’s vanity and piss-poor taste in food — the meals one sees on the plate of a wealthy Californian.

Then there’s the obese.

Although obesity is a problem that impacts red [rightwing] states often more than it does their blue [libtard] counterparts (we tend to have more blacks and poor whites), it is not our side that has been promoting obesity for the past decade to the poor, impressionable and stupid elements of this country.

“Fat acceptance” through “body positivity”, especially in the female form, is part of an overarching left-wing agenda being thrust upon the entire Western world via pop culture, largely (no pun intended 😉 targeting the poor.

So I ask….if it is okay to shame me for driving a gas guzzler, and I am taxed at the pump punitively for doing so (that’s really what climate b.s. is about), why are the CO2 producing-obese free from criticism?

Why is being fat being encouraged by these same demons, while the eating of meat and the driving of gasoline-powered cars, is being discouraged?

If they genuinely cared about “muh climate change”, wouldn’t it stand to reason they’d be calling out the likes of that anti-white, race hustling, pig of a creature, Lizzo, who literally sings about eating?

After all, as an obese woman she is producing mountains more C02 than the likes of little-old-me….

Fact: The obese produce more carbon dioxide as a result of using up more oxygen to run their various bodily functions, compared to those of us with lower weight.

I am not insulting the obese, merely stating a fact.

A photo of the actual leftist Heather Heyer,k who died during the 2017 Charlottesville, Virginia event from a heart attack, NOT from being hit by a WN’s car

Bigger cars emit more exhaust. The obese emit more gas as well.

Like my old 5.7 liter GMC Suburban that I used but once a day to go to and from town, an obese person requires more fuel to perform the same tasks as a smaller vehicle.

Bigger engine, bigger chassis, bigger frame, more seats and more junk in-the-trunk (I can not believe I wrote that) results in higher emissions. The same holds true for human beings with bigger arms, bigger thighs, bigger asses and bigger bellies.

Yet….I am told that I am a bad man for wanting to cart my kids around in a safe 2-ton SUV, and literally insulted for doing so, so why is obesity literally being promoted by the advertising execs on Madison Avenue and evil Hollyweird trendsetters in Los Angeles?

That does not sit right with me.

Why does the same media promoting carbon dioxide producing “body positivity” condemn me for stating that “climate change” is being exploited by our rulers for their own evil gains?

Because the climate-change agenda has never ever EVER been about protecting the environment. One need only look at your heating bill and ALL of the tax and additional fees tacked onto it to protect you from your evil desire to be warm during the winter, to know what this is all about.

Let’s look at a few facts and figures, as we like to do here at johndenugent.com

The heavier you are, the more food is required to keep you heavy – which means more food and drink must be manufactured and brought to the final consumption point.

Heavier people require more fuel consumption for their personal transportation (yes, the term transportation in the field of physiology also refers to the movement of one’s body), which means even more carbon dioxide is formed from food production-related emissions, as well as from the vehicles used to carry said foods to and from the production point, to the consumption point.

The Indian study I found in an American journal claims that “obesity costs the earth about 700 megatons [a “megaton” being one million tons] of emissions each year,” which comes to “almost 2% of ALL manmade emissions”.

All oxygen-dependent beings on earth produce carbon dioxide as a result of systemic and metabolic processes required to sustain life. Total CO2 production from all species is directly linked to their average metabolic rate, average body size, and the total number of individuals of that species, the study writes.

The obese have “greater carbon dioxide production from their oxidative metabolic function than those individuals with a normal body weight.”

In addition, the maintenance of elevated and unnatural body weights “requires greater food and liquid consumption, meaning unnaturally more food and drink needs to be produced and transported to the consumers when consumers are larger than average”.

Makes sense. One does not need to be a scientist to get what’s being said here.

Have you ever had an obese house guest or are you expecting one this forthcoming summer? Let’s just say your food budget is about to go up….WAY up!

This is not an insult, just the facts.

Similarly, the transportation of heavier people results in an increase in the consumption of fossil fuels, which was not really even taken into account in the study due to several reasons I will get into later in this piece.

These additional transportation costs certainly results in greater additional carbon dioxide emissions.

In the study, obesity was estimated to contribute to between an extra 700 to 1000 megatons of carbon-dioxide emissions per annum globally or about 1.6 to 2.0 percent of all “man-made emissions”.

This was a very, VERY conservative measurement as, again, the scientists did not factor in all the other things we know the obese consume more of as part of their overall lifestyles. It is not just the C02 produced by breathing and the transportation of foods, but all the other goods and services [including medical for diabetes, heart attacks, canes, etc.] which obese people require to literally survive.

And MOST importantly, the scientists also only counted an infinitesimally small sliver of the globe’s population – only those they categorized as “morbidly obese”.

The study literally ignored all those individuals not classified as “morbidly” obese by American standards, all those who are slightly and  grossly overweight.

Before and after

 

The “morbidly” obese measured in their study referred to people “above about the 95th percentile on body mass index” or BMI.

For some perspective….I’m in the 60th percentile in body weight in relation to my height according to my doctor and most charts I’ve seen. I am 5’9, 185 pounds.

Although I am certainly not obese (much of that additional weight is muscle ;), I am a lot fatter than I would like to be or was when I was 20. I can EASILY stand to lose about 10 pounds, perhaps even 20 if I really wanted to lean up.

People like me, who are definitely still somewhat overweight, were not factored into the study.

In fact, people even 20 to 30, even 50 pounds heavier than I am at my height were not even measured.

Based on my calculations, if the study factored in a fairer number of the globe’s overweight – say people above the 85thpercentile – they would have found that almost 10% of the world’s CO2 manmade emissions originates in the lungs and bodies of the overweight.

Therefore, take who this study actually measured into consideration when looking at that 1.6% figure. The reality is that the moderately overweight, overweight, obese and morbidly obese contribute closer to 10% of the globe’s CO2 emissions than the 1.6% claimed.

People that sit and do next to nothing (= the sedentary lifestyle) also tend to use more Internet (which expends more C02 than, say, sitting and talking with friends), expends more C02 than walking, and anyone living a more natural and healthy lifestyle.

The buses that cart them around because they can’t walk as far will burn more fuel, because of increased passenger weight per ticket sold ….and all the massive costs of the services that are required to keep them alive (hospitals, ambulances, etc) were not factored into the study.

There are a ton of things (again, no pun intended 😉 that fat people use more of which were overlooked.

That wheezing you hear when Jelly-Jenna or Tubby-Tyrone waddles down the road is, in fact, the sound of the C02 coming our of their mouth. They are not talking to themselves, or humming, because they are happy to see you….just wheezing!

Again, I’m not insulting people (perhaps I am a bit) but if you are going to call me an extremist for balking at the prospect of chowing down on bug-burgers and grasshopper fritters, for driving my car when I decide I want to, for believing that green taxes are a scam and telling Greta Thunberg to shut her ugly, deformed face, then you BETTER call out the obese for their contribution to climate change along with the evil people promoting obesity.

JdN: Greta always ignores all real climate dangers coming from the Deep State, such as geoengineering, chemtrails, government- caused tornadoes, tsunamis, earthquakes and droughts, all carried out via HAARP

Instead, the Establishment and media promotes the lifestyle, while condemning those of us criticising it as being “fat-phobic”.

But it does make sense if you think about it.

To get a little more perspective let’s have a gander at the push to normalise eating bug-meat burgers.

Bugs, like soy, can only really be produced by massive corporate farms. The people that want to control our eating habits have a direct financial stake in shifting public opinion on soy and bugs and pushing veganism due to the fact they are the ones in complete control iof these industries. From cradle to grave, the soybean and the bug are under the complete control of large corporate farms.

While meat and milk is still more often than not reared on small family farms that supply larger corporate food producers, bugs and soy simply cannot be.

There is a shitload more profit in soy and bug-meal than there is in burgers made with beef. For the same reason they push plastic shoes as opposed to leather ones — greed and profit.

When I was a kid, my middle-class parents would only buy us leather shoes because they 1) last longer, 2) feel better (your feet can’t breathe wrapped in plastic), 3) look better and 4) ARE better.

Today, though, parents are literally encouraged to buy disposable plastic shoes for their kids that cost as much as leather ones, ignoring the aforementioned reasons. They are told to do so because it is “responsible” and “better for the planet”– in spite of the fact that plastic shoes are made from oil (how evil!) and from other toxic substances.

Relatively low-cost plastic shoes, once billed as “pleather” due to the fact the crook making them wanted you to believe they were AS GOOD AS leather, are now billed as “vegan leather” and are charged for at a premium, chic rate.

Gullible liberals believe this garbage so much so that demand for leather is at an all-time low, corporations are making a killing hocking cheap plastic products and it’s almost impossible to find quality leather goods at a fair prices. The rich still wear leather shoes, of course.

And, to reiterate, plastic is made from that wicked petroleum. 😉

But again, this is not about saving the planet. It is about getting more money and power.

I was in the store a few weeks ago with my family and noticed a plastic handbag selling for well over 100$ in the front of a well-known department store. On the tag was a tag that read “vegan leather”. There was a card with it, with…I kid you not, a rainbow on it, literally guilting you into buying the cheap plastic monstrosity, hot-glued together by little Vietnamese hands.

Those kids certainly weren’t getting any love from their slave-masters.

I also recently read a review of an Adidas sneaker I was looking at buying as I needed a good leather shoe for the sports I still play. I am not that fat. 😉

The article was encouraging people to buy the plastic version of the shoe. The author was not only proud of the fact that he had bought the new plastic version of the shoe – oops, sorry , I meant “vegan leather” – but was proud that he had paid MORE for it than its leather counterpart.

What the actual F!!!

Corporate shilling? or just another dangerously deluded, gullible, left-wing hipster hack proud he had been tricked into paying 150$ for a bit of plastic?

A fool after all, as the old adage so aptly explains, is soon parted from his money, and from what I’ve come to understand, is often happy to have been so!

Like the battle to end meat consumption, the full-on push for beetle-burgers and plastic shoes has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with lowering CO2 emissions levels, as our cynical oppressors claim.

If our lords and masters genuinely wanted to lower emissions levels, they would not be pushing “body positivity” that leads to unhealthy lives, “fat pride” and even death.

They do so because fat people consume more, require more social and governmental services and health care (making them dependent on the government) and are good for the plantation. The Matrix loves fat people, just as it loves blacks, Mexicans and the stupid.

It’s not about CO2 or health; it is about THEIR control, corporate profits, and tax revenue.

Whether it’s plastic shoes, wave of drug-addled homeless and mentally ill people flooding Los Angeles that require immense services, Mexicans that require translators and beds, the prison industrial complex, or the American-created conflict in Ukraine, it is ALWAYS about the money. THEIRS.

*** THEIR money

Bill Gates designed and owns this mansion that overlooks Lake Washington in Medina, Washington. The 66,000-square-foot (6,100 m²) mansion^[1] incorporates technology in its design. In 2009, property taxes were reported to be US$1.063 million on a total assessed value of US$147.5 million.^[3]

Gates and a wealthy pal. Unlike many other VIPs, Gates started this relationship after Epstein had been convicted of sex crimes:

.

***

Although the elite certainly love our pain and suffering, it’s the fact that societal suffering, conflict, bloodshed and misery results in us ending up needing them to save us from some disaster that often drives these people.

Ending racism and fighting Russia, well, that requires money.

Battling climate change needs more money.

Services the obese and least healthy and productive members of society require even greater sums of money.

The plandemic should have taught us that.

The fact that even by grossly underestimating the number of overweight on this planet, the TOTALITY of the globe’s livestock only produces about 5 times the C02 the planet’s most obese people are responsible for should tell you we are being played.

We constantly hear how bad meat is for the planet, but never once have I heard ANYONE on the media talking about how truly despicable it is on an environmental level for someone to overeat. That should tell you all you need to know about their motivation.

And again this 2% is JUST the difference between the amount of CO2 the morbidly obese would produce if they were thin, and what they DO produce by being deathly fat…..if that makes sense. 😉

It doesn’t factor in people like me, who are about 10 pounds overweight, or pudgy mates of mine who are about 20-to 30 pounds overweight. The study just factored in the morbidly obese.

But it should not surprise anyone. Obesity was behind most of the Covid deaths, yet did our oppressors ask people to live more healthily?

Instead of encouraging healthy living, they locked people down in their houses to get fatter still, gorge on food they probably would not have eaten if not confined, blocked people from cancer screenings (as we covered here on johndenugent.com two years ago)

***

Across the white world, Cohenavirus criminal fraud KILLING WHITES by postponing vital medical screenings

As our site predicted in October — huge increases seen in cancer, Jew York Times admits, because Covid lockdowns cancelled VITAL cancer screenings

***

And they shut down the exercise-enabling gyms, pools, churches, schools and parks….all the while allowing liquor stores and weedshops [marijuana dispensaries] to remain open — of course.

Makes sense, though, if you think about it. In order to hock the vaxx, they needed people to die.

So eat, Lard-ass Lateisha, EAT!!!!

These are sentences I don’t think I ever thought I would construct. If my college self could just see me now!!!

And whereas livestock production and meat consumption are things to which the entire planet contributes, obesity is really only an issue in the West.

So that 1.6% that is closer to 10% is probably now well over 20% — when you factor in what percentage of the population hails from nations that struggle with obesity.

You’ll be hard pressed to find a fat person in India, China, Japan, or even Africa.

A Hong Kong street scene — zero obesity. For all China’s dark side, its elite wants a strong, healthy, productive people 

In fact, the image of the “fat black” is a western phenomenon. Globally, Blacks are generally thin, just as are Asians and most white Europeans, though not the anglosphere and in left-wing Scandinavia.

I travelled around Asia and Africa as a young man, and can hardly recall ever seeing anyone morbidly obese on either continent.

In continental Western Europe ( I am deliberately excluding Britain and Scandinavia, where people consume unhealthier diets) I rarely saw morbidly obese people. In India and across Asia, I’d say I saw tens of thousands of people during my travels — and I can honestly not recall even encountering one fat person.

Mumbai (Bombay), India –not one fattie

 

In Africa there were certainly women with fat derrières, but compared to what one sees waddling about Chicago or Memphis on a Saturday afternoon, it’s not even close. You just can’t compare real Africans with “African Americans.” It’s not just their murder rates that are lower.

For such an oppressed people, our negroes sure do eat well here….

.

If the obese are not being called out for their serious contribution to this supposed climate change, then why should I be shamed for criticising the elite for weaponizing “climate change” (especially if it is actually a natural environmental evolution)?

Why am I called a selfish conservative for not wanting to pay an inordinate amount of tax just for the “privilege” of driving my own truck?

If you’re not going to encourage the obese to thin down to help combat “climate change”, then why are you terrorising me who is not obese about my normal lifestyle, vehicles and mindset?

Why are you stealing my hard-earned money at the pump and via my electricity bill?

These are questions that NEED to be asked to the next moron who dares to discuss climate change with you.

Climate fiend Bono’s trip back to Dublin to retrieve his lucky hat, John Kerry and Meghan Markle’s private jets to and from the Caribbean, and Fat Albert’s arse need to be part of your rebuttal.

In closing I’d like to make two final points before I go for the day.

Instead of the left-wing think tank that analyzed this study in the US calling out our Establishment for promoting fat acceptance, they tried to exploit it to drum up support for even greater rates of taxation to help-the-fatties, quite shockingly, writing,

“This study makes it clear that we pay a steep price for making it difficult to access care for obesity. Not only does obesity affect the health of the individuals who have it, untreated obesity might also contribute to environmental issues,” said Ted Kyle, RPh, MBA, founder of ConscienHealth, who was not involved in the research.”

Ahha, the Left….. We  are never doing enough for someone…..

And my second point: We shouldn’t be surprised the Establishment ignores the issues I have raised, as again, the climate agenda has nothing to do with the environment.

They ignore the war in Ukraine …..

Russian missile hits and sets off a Ukrainian ammo dump in a giant fireball

 

And they are silent on all the emissions we are literally responsible for in their bombing of the Nordstream pipeline. (More methane has been released as a result of Biden’s bombing of NS2 than can be produced by any amount of livestock). And they continue to send Ukraine hundreds of billions in weapons just for them to be blown up in a cloud of CO2 (not to mention the toxins), because they care nothing for this planet.

It’s always been about THEIR power and THEIR control.

________________________________________________________________________________________
Excerpted from the Indian study:

Obesity is defined as an adult having a BMI of 30 or over.

A healthy person’s BMI – calculated by dividing weight in kg by height in metres, and the answer by the height again – is between 18.5 and 24.9.

Among children, obesity is defined as being in the 95th percentile.

Percentiles compare youngsters to others their same age.

For example, if a three-month-old is in the 40th percentile for weight, that means that 40 per cent of three-month-olds weigh the same or less than that baby.

Around 58 per cent of women and 68 per cent of men in the UK are overweight or obese.

“The researchers in the current study resorted to the standard definitions for obesity, namely, a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or more. Normal body weight was defined as usual, a BMI of below 25. They then calculated the excess greenhouse gas emission (including methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide) that would occur due to the increased consumption of oxygen in the metabolism of an obese individual, the excess emissions due to the higher demand for food and beverages, which need to be produced in excess of normal, and the excess fuel required to carry around more bulky people.

The findings

They found that each obese individual on average had 81 extra kg/year of carbon emissions due to increased oxygen consumption via metabolism.

In relation to the excess consumption of food and drink, the carbon emission exceeded that of a normal individual by over 590 kg/year. Transportation of the greater body weight cost another extra 476 kg/year of emissions from car or air transport.

Thus, obese individuals produce about a quarter more greenhouse gases than those with normal body weight.”

.

.

.

…..spiritual reading for May 24

This could be a very sweet day. Open hearts are easy today, and if you can manage that, you will likely feel happiness and alignment and gratitude. This is all very good.

Try to be loose and flexible in your dealings, not only with the external, but with what lies within as well. You may run into some surprises, some twists or turns you hadn’t counted on. Do your best, improvise and above all, don’t panic. All is well today. Nothing terrible need happen. If it does, see if you can tell whether it is truly a disaster or if perhaps it is your own rigidity that is leading to problems. Most probably, it will be the later.

And if you indeed encounter a serious challenge in circumstance, please try your best to stay fluid. Tightening up—whether mentally, emotionally or physically— is most counterproductive today. Even when you might feel the situation justifies such a response. It won’t help, we assure you.

But, as we said, chances are you can enjoy this one. Step into it with that expectation, and the likelihood increases. It is time for you to have a day of, one where the universe carries you lightly and gently. A day for some fun and the recognition that nothing is all that serious or important.

If you have work to do, do it. If you are with others, play. If you are alone, revel in your solitude. It doesn’t really matter where you are engaged, but rather how. Just take it as easy as you can and keep all things in perspective.

If you find yourself contracting, redirection is the best antidote. Serious practice and focus may help, but we recommend something that takes you far away from whatever it is that troubles you. Watch a movie, talk to a friend about something unrelated, read a book, do something outdoors that captures your attention.

Float on the surface today, heart open and full of love for self and others. Do not reach into the depths or look for them around you. They are there with all the usual suspects lurking, but this is not the day to deal with them. Today, feed the child-nature in your spirit, sparkle, dance, laugh and let yourself be touched by the goodness of your life.

We send much love and all of our blessings.

.

.

.