Spiritual reading; fake moon landing — watch the body language and anemic arguments

Spread the love

Hilarious sequence from the 1971 James Bond movie “Diamonds Are Forever,” where 007 (Sean Connery) dashes right through a blatantly fake moon-landing movie set, and, of course, ruthlessly escapes the bad guys by stealing the lunar rover and driving with it down the street in southern California!  😉

NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong drew this depiction soon after his return in July 1969 of alien craft observing the American  astronauts in their crater on the moon.

Photo taken as the lunar orbiter approached the Moon during Apollo 16.What exactly is that disk doing? And just who is flying it? Do they want US there?

 

…Spiritual reading for July 25

Try not to let anything hold you back today. It is a good day to gather the strength you have shown yourself that you have and to put it to a purpose.

You will know what that purpose ought to be, whether it be temporal or eternal or something else entirely. But whatever it is, it is important that you understand just how many resources are at your disposal, and  equally important that you draw upon them today to accomplish something of great value to you.

Your capacity is virtually infinite and yet you can, in general, only draw upon that which you have seen in concrete and demonstrable form. Although it is good when you really understand the extraordinary extent of what you have available, today the intent is to really see that which you have proved to yourself exists, that which is concrete and demonstrable. So look back, if you will, over the last few days, weeks and months, to survey where you have shown yourself to be wise and strong.

Understand that those moments are not stuck in time, but available to you now and at any moment. Gather them together as the necessary fuel for whatever it is that you wish to tackle today. You have more than enough resources and you can do
whatever it is that you wish to do.

Banish fear, reluctance, doubt, self-sabotage and beliefs that keep you small. Sounds grand, but it is nothing beyond your reach.

Think like the gods you are and you will see the way to accomplish just about anything. Allow yourself to be full of all the positivity and optimism that you have.

Also, take care of your body today. Extra attention to your physical well-being will take you a long way and support all the rest of your efforts. Even in small ways, offering some special gesture of love and caring for your physical form will make a big difference.

It is a day for great achievement if you seize it. You are equal to your challenges and then some. Do not doubt this, for it is the truth.

We love you so much and send you all of our blessings.

.

.

…..”Why Files” does a semi-wuss-out on the moon landings

I have seen A.J., host  of the “Why Files” on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/@TheWhyFiles), who is a former successful comedian and actor who now does video exposés of government lies (especially CIA) in every area (and seems to be a libertarian, small-government conservative), both do superb work and also, with seriously dangerous topics, sometimes wuss out.

The video below on the Apollo 11 supposed moon landing shows me, not that A.J. is an asset (a willing and eager puppet like, for example, Lindsey Graham or Mike Pence), but that he is very fearful of “going too far.”

After all, no one wants to be roughed up, have his tires slashed, be poisoned, shot — or framed and put in prison on some bogus charge.

Plus, the man now has built up 2.4 million subscribers on JewTube, and this staggering number came from years of hard work by A.J. and his family, the Gentiles (which is their last name, of Italian origin).

So the man occasio0nally does a rather weak wuss-out after telling a ton of truth. The wuss-out is sometimes a really dubious sort of refutation, indicating tome  that A.J., is sending us between the lines an apologetic signal:

“Sorry,  guys, but I HAD to say some b.s. right at the end….”

Note, first, his summary of the video, which to his credit leans totally toward “the moon landing was a myth, shot in a film studio by Stanley Kubrik.”

***

The Moon Landing: Stanley Kubrick’s Greatest Film | How NASA and Hollywood Fooled the World

Stanley Kubrick is considered one of the greatest filmmakers of all time. Of his 13 movies a few are considered classics in their respective genres. Including the black comedy “Dr. Strangelove,” the highly-quotable anti-war commentary of “Full Metal Jacket,” and one of the most disturbing and enduring horror films of all time, “The Shining.”

*** JdN: Kubrick was also, like Bobby Fischer, or now comédienne Roseanne Barr, a jew who came to reject Judaism

 

***

But in 1968, Kubrick released “2001 – A Space Odyssey”. This is more than a classic. It’s a masterpiece. And widely regarded as one of the best science-fiction films of all time, and probably the most influential. This collaboration with science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke tells the story of an alien intelligence that visited Earth in the distant past, and left behind artifacts in the solar system.

The movie features groundbreaking special effects, which still hold up today. In fact, the effects looked so good, that the movie gave the American government an idea. Billions of tax dollars were invested in the space program but the Soviets were still years ahead of the United States.

*** JdN: Soviet firsts

As A.J. proves, the Soviet Russians in the 1950s and 1960s were WAY ahead of us in what then was called “the space race”:  They launched the first animals into space (monkeys, dogs, rats, etc.); then the first man, Yuri Gagarin; then the first woman; and then the first space walk. But suddenly, the US zooms ahead of the Russkies with the successful moon landing….a-hah…..

***

NASA desperately needed to get to the moon before Russia, but they knew it was impossible. So they turned to one of the world’s best filmmakers for help. Because when it came to the moon: if they couldn’t make it, they’d fake it.

***

This is because of the radioactive Van Allen Belt. Some claim it can be escaped/avoided by launching over the North or South Poles, but others do not agree.

A.J. offers two powerful things in this regard:

— some simply incredible facts here which I did not know, such as flying through this “Belt” would not only kill any astronauts with radioactivity but also fry them to a cinder with heat from passing through a giant field of charged electrons

— A.J.  has THREE different NASA people say “we do not know how to survive the Van Allen Belt”:

1), an official NASA spokesman,

2) an “International Space Station” astronaut floating in the station in low-earth orbit,

and

3) a NASA astronaut named Tom Pettit.

.

This stuff is incredibly powerful, with NASA itself saying it, and that is dispositive.

This proves from the mouth of three different NASA officials that something is very fishy about the “moon landing.”

So as you watch the video, we see A.J. trot out his best stuff debunking the moon landing — including clearly faked photos

But this one is not fake. The lunar landing craft casts a shadow  from the sunlight, as do also the flagpole and the rock in the foreground near it — but we see no shadows to the right of the astronaut’s legs and boots! 😉 But this is because this was that famous scene when the astronaut jumped upward while saluting.

 

..and the real clincher is the Van Allen problem, as ADMITTED by NASA!

Some of A.J. Gentile’s anemic semi-debunking is really weak, especially about differing boot prints, and fake photos that, he says, aren’t really fake — but, oh yes they are.

And then he shows the lunar module, at the end of the moon-exploring mission, blasting off somehow back up to lunar orbit — but with NO flame at all! It does look like a cable pulled it up, and lifted it rather slowly to boot, and with, some say, a visible wobble.

Blast-off with no flame

 

A.J. offers to explain how there is no dust seen on the pod feet of the landing craft after it touched down on the very dusty moon.

See, the lunar landing craft had simply shut its engines off, so it just dropped — safely, mind you — like a rock the final ten feet to the surface….

A.J’s heart is just not in it. His body language is really dead during this last segment; his eyes are without enthusiasm, as always when he feels constrained to support the Establishment line. (But he is all perky during his sincere debunkings of things he really does believe to be lies and bogus.)

This glumness by A.J. at the end reminds me of the Apollo 11 astronauts at their post-mission press conference…. VERY visibly uncomfortable and unhappy.

.

And, finally A.J, in his last segment — the listless debunking — actually never even begins to re-examine the key Van Allen Belt dilemma!

In fact, he notably offers NO debunking of it at all, and especially not of the two NASA people (and how could he?) saying “this problem has not yet been solved.”

I saw something similar with Tucker Carlson before FOX fired him. He would report on, and make REGULAR TARGETS of  jews like George Soros, that Samuel Bankman-Fried crook, the ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt, the machinations of Blackrock and its CEO, Larry Fink, and yet Tucker somehow never mentions that they were all jews (or that Zelensky is a jew, and Adam Schiff, and the husband of Kamala Harris, and on and on)……

But I can say that many, many Republicans and conservatives, including Colonel Douglas MacGregor — and also paleo-Democrat Bobby Kennedy, Junior  —  sure are THINKING it.

“When will somebody — I’m too fearful myself, and have too much to lose –finally stand up and confront these psycho jews that are destroying this country?”

So here comes the “Why Files” video on the fake moon landing, and please do focus on the three NASA people –the spokesman, the ISS astronaut, and the NASA astronaut, all saying the Van Allen Belt is still lethal and thus impassable.

This means we never went to the moon, or, God only knows, did we get there but only because some shielding was provided by aliens (Greys?) …

But if so, then did the astronauts encounter hostile aliens on the moon? This is something which Neil Armstrong did hint at on an open mike.

*** Or was it a US “Secret Space Program” that got us to the moon, with Grey technology?

 

IMPORTANT NEW BLOG Strange sights in night sky; mysterious death of Neil Armstrong; US regime tried for 10 years to extradite Scottish hacker Gary McKinnon over revealing a US “Secret Space Program”; actual conversations by Apollo astronauts with Mission Control in Houston about seeing alien craft and structures on the Moon

***

It is so hard to know for us the truth about all this, or impossible. But clearly, as with everything the federal government does, it is lying to the American people and to the world, and covering up something big.

Oh, and if the moon landings — which brought America so much prestige and “proved” that “we Americans beat the Russians” — were all fake, why then did the Soviet Union not denounce them, and expose the capitalistic Americans as liars? Is is true that the USSR lacked back then the telemetry — the gigantic optical and radio telescopes — in the late Sixties and early Seventies period which would have enabled them to watch the US lunar capsules head moon-wards and see if they actually did get to the moon and return safely, or not?

Watch especially from 19:55-25:17 the Van Allen segment, or, even more specifically, 23:10-25:17, where the three top NASA people say the Van Allen Belt is still a KILL ZONE that is stopping us from leaving low earth orbit.

This can only evoke a world-class “WTF!”

How did the Apollo astronauts ever leave the earth and fly out to the moon eight times, from May 1969 (Apollo TEN, which orbited the moon without landing there) through December 1972 with Apollo SEVENTEEN?

Why weren’t they irradiated to death and then their corpses fried?

.

 

I note at the end that A.J. seems to have arrived at the same conclusion that I did years ago — that what we are shown as the moon landings was truly fake…. and indeed Stanley Kubrick movie-studio footage. BUT this does not mean the US has never been on the moon……

So here, as in so many other areas, every word out of the mouth of the Jewnited Snakes government is a lie or a half-lie, a partial truth covering up something huge and probably evil.

And that partial-truth organization in this case would be NASA, the nice, civilian space agency that covers up a Secret Space Program that is in league with the Greys, and is keeping dazzling technology from the American people.

This unholy alliance is exactly what, in 1954, the Nordics warned Eisenhower against.

And imagine the cover-up of lunar landings if, among other hostiles, NS Germans are now up there? If the Reich had combat-ready flying saucers way back in 1947, WHICH ENDED US NAVY ADMIRAL BYRD’S “OPERATION HIGHJUMP,” what technology 76 years later, in 2023, does the Reich possess and use NOW?

 

The continuing reality of the Reich; the “Absetzbewegung”, the successful Disengagement Movement of 1943-45

.

……Can you donate today?

Western Union, cash wrapped in aluminum foil, PayPal, Gabpay, bank wire…. Things are really tight.

$6,583 (plus seven excellent books and two great pistol holsters) since December first

8 Comments

  1. If the moon landing were faked, why did the Soviet Union not expose it? After all, there was a cold war going on.

    Furthermore, powerful forces were then as now striving to discredit the White nation of the United States.

    It would take very strong evidence before I would believe that the moon landing were faked. And such powerful evidence is lacking.

    • I do not think hard evidence is at all lacking. Did you watch the video?

      THREE NASA officials said recently we cannot pass through the Van Allen Belt.

      NASA officials…

      But I can only speculate why the Soviet Union would not expose this scandal….unless they truly lacked the telemetry to verify or disprove the Apollo flights.

    • I do not think hard evidence is at all lacking. Did you watch the video?

      THREE NASA officials said — recently — we still cannot pass through the Van Allen Belt….NASA officials… 😉 What more is required?

      But I can only speculate why the Soviet Union would not expose this scandal….unless they truly lacked the telemetry to verify or disprove the Apollo flights. Or maybe at some point a deal was made where the Soviets did not use the “dirt” they had on the US and the US, in turn, agreed to not expose some Soviet scandal…..

  2. I am old enough to remember that in 1957 the Soviets put a dog in orbit.

    How did this dog survive the Van Allen Belt?

    I will watch the video, but there is much anti-American propaganda being put out these days that I am highly sceptical of any claim that our moon landing was fraudulent.

    • Thank you for your good question, Kendra, regarding Laika, the Soviet-Russia dog who went into space, so I did some research.

      Wikipedia on the altitude of the inner/lower Van Allen Belt:

      The inner [= lower] Van Allen Belt extends typically from an altitude of […] 1,000 km (620 mi) up to 12,000 km (7,500 mi) above the Earth.

      As for the Sputnik 2 which, on 3 November 1957, carried the dog Laika into space, Wiki says it orbited at a top altitude (apogee) of 1,659 kilometres (1,031 mi), so it rose barely into the lowest, weakest stratum of the inner Van Allen Belt.

      A replica of the capsule

      The poor doggie, however, still did not make it; the air conditioning system failed and she overheated after many hours of 109 degrees F/43 Celsius.

      Khrushchev had rushed Sputnik 2 into space in order to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the Bolshevik putsch….. As we know, the Bolsheviks had killed millions of innocent humans over those 40 years, and Khrushchev himself had been a merciless commissar during the Holodomor (induced famine) in Ukraine.

      Wiki:

      “In 1938, Stalin sent him to govern the Ukrainian SSR, and he continued the purges there.”

      So what was the life and safety of a mere dog like Laika to a communist like Nikita Khrushchev?…


      .

      But on a lighter note, since the dog was a stray and mixed-breed from a dog pound in Moscow, American newspapers dubbed the pooch “Muttnik.” 😉
      .
      .

  3. “What was the life and safety of a mere dog like Laika to a communist like Nikita Khrushchev?”

    I read somewhere that prisoners in the Soviet gulag actually wished to have the status of the animals there, the dogs and horses, because the animals were definitely better treated than the humans.

  4. I’ve read that the Soviets didn’t have radars powerful enough to detect the Apollo astronauts in Earth orbit until 1972, which is coincidentally when the Apollo missions ended with Apollo 17, even though they were fully funded through Apollo 20. Granted, the Soviets surely knew that the Apollo moon landings were fake, but without hard radar data, couldn’t prove it.

    Another possibilty is that the “Cold War” between the U.S. and Soviet Union was simply theater staged by the Zionist banksters who own both countries, and that they worked together behind the scenes to cover up this massive hoax. The Soviets were likely given U.S. technologies and secrets in return for keeping quiet about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*