DEUTSCHE ARTIKEL RECHTS/ARTICLES FRANCAIS A DROITE
* * *
Johann Sebastian Bach’s “Toccata and Fuge in D-minor” was his most majestic work. In the unique and extremely popular video below, as you savor the grandeur of this Aryan musical tour de force ….. you can see the keys moving in an extraordinary graphic display:
.
===========Vladimir the Great speaks
This is the great man of the largest nation on earth, and thank God it is a white nation. But he cannot perform miracles alone, and Mother Russia has been struggling, still terribly weakened — genetically, spiritually and economically — by 90 years of Jewish rule…………. The Western Aryans must help this great man. (The Russian WNs believe he is a traitor, but I disagree. He is simply faced with an overwhelming task.)
.
.
===================HUMOR
=========================YOUR STATE’S DOWNFALL
1960-1990:
http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0056/twps0056.html
Historical Census Statistics on Population Totals By Race, 1790 to 1990, and By Hispanic Origin, 1970 to 1990, For The United States, Regions, Divisions, and States
2000 & 2010:
http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en&_ts=]American FactFinder
Demographic Transformation of America: White Genocide
What will be presented in this thread, in increments of ten states, will be a compilation of census data detailing the white population percentages since 1970, and in most states since 1960.
First 10 states:
1. Alabama:
2010: 67.0% white (3.3% decrease since 2000)
2000: 70.3% white (3.0% decrease since 1990)
1990: 73.3% white (No change since 1980)
1980: 73.3% white (No change since 1970)
1970: 73.3% white (3.4% increase since 1960)
1960: 69.9% white
2. Alaska
2010: 64.1% white (3.5% decrease since 2000)
2000: 67.6% white (6.3% decrease since 1990)
1990: 73.9% white (1.9% decrease since 1980)
1980: 75.8% white (1.4% decrease since 1970)
1970: 77.2% white (No change since 1960)
1960: 77.2% white
3. Arizona
2010: 57.8% white (6.0% decrease since 2000)
2000: 63.8% white (7.9% decrease since 1990)
1990: 71.7% white (2.8% decrease since 1980)
1980: 74.5% white (0.2% increase since 1970)
1970: 74.3% white
4. Arkansas
2010: 74.5% white (4.1% decrease since 2000)
2000: 78.6% white (3.3% decrease since 1990)
1990: 81.9% white (0.3% decrease since 1980)
1980: 82.2% white (1.2% increase since 1970)
1970: 81.0% white (2.9% increase since 1960)
1960: 78.1% white
5. California
2010: 40.1% white (6.6% decrease since 2000)
2000: 46.7% white (10.5% decrease since 1990)
1990: 57.2% white (9.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 66.7% white (9.6% decrease since 1970)
1970: 76.3% white
6. Colorado
2010: 70.0% white (4.5% decrease since 2000)
2000: 74.5% white (6.2% decrease since 1990)
1990: 80.7% white (2.0% decrease since 1980)
1980: 82.7% white (1.9% decrease since 1970)
1970: 84.6% white
7. Connecticut
2010: 71.2% white (6.3% decrease since 2000)
2000: 77.5% white (6.3% decrease since 1990)
1990: 83.8% white (4.2% decrease since 1980)
1980: 88.0% white (3.4% decrease since 1970)
1970: 91.4% white (4.2% decrease since 1960)
1960: 95.6% white
8. Delaware
2010: 65.3% white (7.2% decrease since 2000)
2000: 72.5% white (6.8% decrease since 1990)
1990: 79.3% white (2.0% decrease since 1980)
1980: 81.3% white (2.8% decrease since 1970)
1970: 84.1% white (2.0% decrease since 1960)
1960: 86.1% white
9. Florida
2010: 57.9% white (7.5% decrease since 2000)
2000: 65.4% white (7.8% decrease since 1990)
1990: 73.2% white (3.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 76.7% white (1.2% decrease since 1970)
1970: 77.9% white
10. Georgia
2010: 55.9% white (6.7% decrease since 2000)
2000: 62.6% white (7.5% decrease since 1990)
1990: 70.1% white (1.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 71.6% white (1.8% decrease since 1970)
1970: 73.4% white (2.0% increase since 1960)
1960: 71.4% white
11. Hawaii
2010: 22.7% white (0.2% decrease since 2000)
2000: 22.9% white (8.5% decrease since 1990)
1990: 31.4% white (0.3% increase since 1980)
1980: 31.1% white (5.8% decrease since 1970)
1970: 36.9% white (4.9% increase since 1960)
1960: 32.0% white
12. Idaho
2010: 84.0% white (4.0% decrease since 2000)
2000: 88.0% white (4.2% decrease since 1990)
1990: 92.2% white (1.7% decrease since 1980)
1980: 93.9% white (2.0% decrease since 1970)
1970: 95.9% white (2.6% decrease since 1960)
1960: 98.5% white
13. Illinois
2010: 63.7% white (4.1% decrease since 2000)
2000: 67.8% white (7.0% decrease since 1990)
1990: 74.8% white (3.2% decrease since 1980)
1980: 78.0% white (5.5% decrease since 1970)
1970: 83.5% white
14. Indiana
2010: 81.5% white (4.3% decrease since 2000)
2000: 85.8% white (4.2% decrease since 1990)
1990: 89.6% white (0.6% decrease since 1980)
1980: 90.2% white (1.5% decrease since 1970)
1970: 91.7% white
15. Iowa
2010: 88.7% white (3.9% decrease since 2000)
2000: 92.6% white (3.3% decrease since 1990)
1990: 95.9% white (1.0% decrease since 1980)
1980: 96.9% white (1.1% decrease since 1970)
1970: 98.0% white (1.0% decrease since 1960)
1960: 99.0% white
16. Kansas
2010: 78.2% white (4.9% decrease since 2000)
2000: 83.1% white (5.3% decrease since 1990)
1990: 88.4% white (2.1% decrease since 1980)
1980: 90.5% white (2.2% decrease since 1970)
1970: 92.7% white (4.7% decrease since 1960)
1960: 95.4% white
17. Kentucky
2010: 86.3% white (3.0% since 2000)
2000: 89.3% white (2.4% decrease since 1990)
1990: 91.7% white (no change since 1980)
1980: 91.7% white (0.7% decrease since 1970)
1970: 92.4% white (0.4% decrease since 1960)
1960: 92.8% white
18. Louisiana
2010: 60.3% white (2.2% decrease since 2000)
2000: 62.5% white (3.3% decrease since 1990)
1990: 65.8% white (1.8% decrease since 1980)
1980: 67.6% white (0.6% decrease since 1970)
1970: 68.2% white (0.3% increase since 1960)
1960: 67.9% white
19. Maine
2010: Data not yet released
2000: 96.5% white (1.5% decrease since 1990)
1990: 98.0% white (0.3% decrease since 1980)
1980: 98.3% white (0.8% decrease since 1970)
1970: 99.1% white (0.3% decrease since 1960)
1960: 99.4% white
20. Maryland
2010: 54.7% white (7.4% decrease since 2000)
2000: 62.1% white (7.5% decrease since 1990)
1990: 69.6% white (4.3% decrease since 1980)
1980: 73.9% white (6.5% decrease since 1970)
1970: 80.4% white (2.6% decrease since 1960)
1960: 83.0% white
21. Massachusetts
2010: Data yet to be released
2000: 81.9% white (6.9% decrease since 1990)
1990: 87.8% white (4.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 92.3% white (3.1% decrease since 1970)
1970: 95.4% white (2.4% decrease since 1960)
1960: 97.6% white
22. Michigan
2010: Data yet to be released
2000: 78.6% white (3.7% decrease since 1990)
1990: 82.3% white (1.8% decrease since 1980)
1980: 84.1% white (3.0% decrease since 1970)
1970: 87.1% white
23. Minnesota
2010: 83.1% white (5.1% decrease since 2000)
2000: 88.2% white (5.5% decrease since 1990)
1990: 93.7% white (2.4% decrease since 1980)
1980: 96.1% white (1.6% decrease since 1970)
1970: 97.7% white (1.1% decrease since 1960)
1960: 98.8% white
24. Mississippi
2010: 58.0% white (2.7% since 2000)
2000: 60.7% white (2.4% decrease since 1990)
1990: 63.1% white (0.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 63.6% white (1.0% increase since 1970)
1970: 62.6% white (4.9% increase since 1960)
1960: 57.7% white
25. Missouri
2010: 81.0% white (2.8% decrease since 2000)
2000: 83.8% white (3.1% decrease since 1990)
1990: 86.9% white (0.8% decrease since 1980)
1980: 87.7% white (0.9% decrease since 1970)
1970: 88.6% white (2.2% decrease since 1960)
1960: 90.8% white
26. Montana
2010: 87.8% white (1.7% decrease since 2000)
2000: 89.5% white (2.3% decrease since 1990)
1990: 91.8% white (1.6% decrease since 1980)
1980: 93.4% white (1.3% decrease since 1970)
1970: 94.7% white (1.7% decrease since 1960)
1960: 96.4% white
27. Nebraska
2010: 82.1% white (5.2% decrease since 2000)
2000: 87.3% white (5.2% decrease since 1990)
1990: 92.5% white (1.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 94.0% white (1.2% decrease since 1970)
1970: 95.2% white (2.2% decrease since 1960)
1960: 97.4% white
28. Nevada
2010: 54.1% white (11.1% decrease since 2000)
2000: 65.2% white (13.5% decrease since 1990)
1990: 78.7% white (5.6% decrease since 1980)
1980: 83.3% white (3.4% decrease since 1970)
1970: 86.7% white (5.6% decrease since 1960)
1960: 92.3% white
29. New Jersey
2010: 59.3% white (6.7% decrease since 2000)
2000: 66.0% white (8.0% decrease since 1990)
1990: 74.0% white (5.1% decrease since 1980)
1980: 79.1% white (5.6% decrease since 1970)
1970: 84.7% white
30. New Mexico
2010: 40.5% white (4.2% decrease since 2000)
2000: 44.7% white (5.7% decrease since 1990)
1990: 50.4% white (2.2% decrease since 1980)
1980: 52.6% white (1.2% decrease since 1970)
1970: 53.8% white
31. New York
2010: Data yet to be released
2000: 62.0% white (7.7% decrease since 1990)
1990: 69.3% white (5.7% decrease since 1980)
1980: 75.0% white (5.1% decrease since 1970)
1970: 80.1% white
32. North Carolina
2010: 65.3% white (4.9% decrease since 2000)
2000: 70.2% white (4.8% decrease since 1990)
1990: 75.0% white (0.3% decrease since 1980)
1980: 75.3% white (1.2% decrease since 1970)
1970: 76.5% white (1.9% increase since 1960)
1960: 74.6% white
33. North Dakota
2010: 88.9% white (1.8% decrease since 2000)
2000: 91.7% white (2.5% decrease since 1990)
1990: 94.2% white (1.3% decrease since 1980)
1980: 95.5% white (1.4% decrease since 1970)
1970: 96.9% white (1.1% decrease since 1960)
1960: 98.0% white
34. Ohio
2010: 81.1% white (2.9% decrease since 2000)
2000: 84.0% white (3.1% decrease since 1990)
1990: 87.1% white (1.1% decrease since 1980)
1980: 88.2% white (1.7% decrease since 1970)
1970: 89.8% white (2.0% decrease since 1960)
1960: 91.8% white
35. Oklahoma
2010: 68.7% white (5.4% decrease since 2000)
2000: 74.1% white (6.9% decrease since 1990)
1990: 81.0% white (4.0% decrease since 1980)
1980: 85.0% white (3.1% decrease since 1970)
1970: 88.1% white (2.4% decrease since 1960)
1960: 90.5% white
36. Oregon
2010: 78.5% white (5.0% decrease since 2000)
2000: 83.5% white (7.3% decrease since 1990)
1990: 90.8% white (2.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 93.3% white (2.5% decrease since 1970)
1970: 95.8% white (2.1% decrease since 1960)
1960: 97.9% white
37. Pennsylvania
2010: 79.5% white (4.6% decrease since 2000)
2000: 84.1% white (3.6% decrease since 1990)
1990: 87.7% white (1.4% decrease since 1980)
1980: 89.1% white (1.2% decrease since 1970)
1970: 90.3% white (2.1% decrease since 1960)
1960: 92.4% white
38. Rhode Island
2010: Data yet to be released
2000: 81.9% white (7.4% decrease since 1990)
1990: 89.3% white (4.1% decrease since 1980)
1980: 93.4% white (2.7% decrease since 1970)
1970: 96.1% white (1.5% decrease since 1960)
1960: 97.6% white
39. South Carolina
2010: Data yet to be released
2000: 66.1% white (2.4% decrease since 1990)
1990: 68.5% white (0.2% increase since 1980)
1980: 68.3% white (0.7% decrease since 1970)
1970: 69.0% white (3.9% increase since 1960)
1960: 65.1% white
40. South Dakota
2010: 84.7% white (3.3% decrease since 2000)
2000: 88.0% white (3.2% decrease since 1990)
1990: 91.2% white (1.1% decrease since 1980)
1980: 92.3% white (2.3% decrease since 1970)
1970: 94.6% white (1.4% decrease since 1960)
1960: 96.0% white
41. Tennessee
2010: 76.6% white (2.6% decrease since 2000)
2000: 79.2% white (3.4% decrease since 1990)
1990: 82.6% white (0.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 83.1% white (0.6% decrease since 1970)
1970: 83.7% white (0.2% decrease since 1960)
1960: 83.5% white
42. Texas
2010: 45.3% white (7.1% decrease since 2000)
2000: 52.4% white (8.2% decrease since 1990)
1990: 60.6% white (5.1% decrease since 1980)
1980: 65.7% white (4.1% decrease since 1970)
1970: 69.6% white
43. Utah
2010: 80.4% white (4.9% decrease since 2000)
2000: 85.3% white (5.9% decrease since 1990)
1990: 91.2% white (1.2% decrease since 1980)
1980: 92.4% white (1.2% decrease since 1970)
1970: 93.6% white (4.5% decrease since 1960)
1960: 98.1% white
44.Vermont
2010: 94.3% white (1.9% decrease since 2000)
2000: 96.2% white (1.9% decrease since 1990)
1990: 98.1% white (0.4% decrease since 1980)
1980: 98.5% white (0.7% decrease since 1970)
1970: 99.2% white (0.6% decrease since 1960)
1960: 99.8% white
45.Virginia
2010: 64.8% white (5.4% decrease since 2000)
2000: 70.2% white (5.8% decrease since 1990)
1990: 76.0% white (2.2% decrease since 1980)
1980: 78.2% white (1.9% decrease since 1970)
1970: 80.1% white (0.9% increase since 1960)
1960: 79.2% white
46. Washington
2010: 72.5% white (6.4% decrease since 2000)
2000: 78.9% white (7.8% decrease since 1990)
1990: 86.7% white (3.5% decrease since 1980)
1980: 90.2% white (3.4% decrease since 1970)
1970: 93.6% white (2.8% decrease since 1960)
1960: 96.4% white
47. West Virginia
2010: Data yet to be released
2000: 94.6% white (1.2% decrease since 1990)
1990: 95.8% white (0.2% increase since 1980)
1980: 95.6% white (0.1% decrease since 1970)
1970: 95.7% white (0.6% decrease since 1960)
1960: 95.1% white
48.Wisconsin
2010: 83.3% white (4.0% decrease since 2000)
2000: 87.3% white (4.0% decrease since 1990)
1990: 91.3% white (2.3% decrease since 1980)
1980: 93.6% white (2.0% decrease since 1970)
1970: 95.6% white (2.0% decrease since 1960)
1960: 97.6% white
49. Wyoming
2010: 85.9% white (3.0% decrease since 2000)
2000: 88.9% white (2.1% decrease since 1990)
1990: 91.0% white (1.0% decrease since 1980)
1980: 92.0% white (0.1% decrease since 1970)
1970: 92.1% white (5.7% decrease since 1960)
1960: 97.8% white
========FRENCH RABBI RON CHAYA PREACHES WORLD WAR DESPITE GENTILE OPPOSITION
Talmud, Bammidber Raba c 21 & Jalkut 772: Any Jew who sheds the blood of the goyim is in effect making a sacred offering to God.
Talmud, Zohar II, 43a : The extermination of the goyim is a sacrifice agreeable to God.
Talmud, Sepher Ou Israël 177b : if a Jew kills a goy, it is not a sin.
Talmud, Zohar II, 64b : The birth rate of the goyim must be significantly diminished.
The French rabbi Ron Chaya tells his listeners about Purim (the date the crypto-Jew Obama attacked Libya, and the date when Bush attacked Iraq) and what the goyim must expect if they rebel against the Jew. “After the hanging of Haman and his ten sons God asks Esther what she wants now, and she responds: “May You hang up and display the cadavers of the [already executed!] sons of Haman.”
Chaya gloats that Goering wore sunglasses to hide the fact that he was crying [for the destruction of his people and Cause]. He suggests that it was Yahweh’s will that exactly ten “Nazis” be hanged, not eleven…..
October 1946: At the Nuremberg “War Crimes Trials” (where the Allied war criminals hanged TEN innocent German leaders). On 16 October 1946 the death sentences are executed in the early morning hours. Of the twenty charged, exactly TEN are hanged………….
The Jews have been a people of POISONERS for millennia. (Queen Elizabeth I — of Spanish Armada and Shakespeare fame — had her Jewish physician executed for plotting to poison HER.)
However did Goering obtain poison to suicide himself hours before his hanging, which would have made ELEVEN “sons of Hitler” hanged…..?
Answer: Impossible. The Jews poisoned him, because they wanted to hang exactly ten “sons of chancellor Hitler,” just as they supposedly hanged ten sons of the anti-Jewish (and Iranian!! as in IRAN, Land of Aryans) chancellor Haman.
(Btw, there is no historical record whatsoever of a Queen Esther or a prime minister Haman. The entire story is a fictional fantasy of Jewish revenge. Martin Luther, when translating the Bible into German, noted with shock that the word “God” is not mentioned even ONCE in this purely tribal vengeance story. Basically, what Esther gives the Persian emperor is “the best sex” of his life to manipulate him into executing the enemies of the Jews, using on top of it a verbal maneuver wher she gets him to promise her “anything” for ger “services” — and then she drops the bombshell: “Hang your own prime minister since you publicly swore to give me anything! I reveal now that I am Jewish and Haman is my people’s enemy”. The no-doubt “blow-job”-addicted ruler — Jewish girls love to get men addicted to “blow jobs,” then withhold them pending a “deal” — then accedes to her exigent request, for otherwise 1) he will never get another “blow job” like THAT, and 2) he will be seen before the court and foreign ambassadors as an oath-breaker. No wonder Luther was horrified by the sordid Book of Esther and asked if this book even belonged in the Bible!)
You may get something out of these two videos in French, at least from the photos; if not, skip them.
In the first, Rabbi Chaya is speaking about Purim and vengeance….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeS96F2vJl4&feature=player_embedded
In the second, found on a RUSSIAN website, the video (in French, and by a French WN) explains that the Nuremberg ten who were hanged died on the tenth day of the Festival of Booths, called the “Day of Judgment.” (It is NOT true that they were hanged on Purim; that comes in March.) All enemies of the Jews become “Amalek,” and they and all their people should be exterminated. The hangman deliberately hanged them incorrectly — so they slowly suffocated — and on a faulty gallows — so they broke their noses when falling through the trap door. (THAT explains the bloody faces of many of the “ten sons of chancellor Hitler.”.)
http://rutube.ru/tracks/3821816.html?v=fd5b0ca8fb708e7b9dfaba782825ebd6
I also found a video of Chaya speaking, whence this screenshot of the almost purely neanderthalic features of the fat, no-neck, slopeheaded, chinless Jewish moderator of this discussion between the rabbis Chaya and Benchetrit….)
Here, now, is a key statement by Rabbi Ron Chaya:
(First in the original French)
” ... C’est marqué dans les textes qu’à la fin des temps il y aura une grande guerre dans le monde […]c’est vrai que tout le monde sent un peu que c’est pour bientôt, on sait pas quand ça se passera, c’est marqué très clairement qu’il y aura une grande guerre entre l’Occident et l’Orient […] mais les peuples verront que si ils font la guerre entres eux le seul qui va en profiter en fait c’est le peuple d’Israel et ils vont tout faire pour pas rentrer en guerre mais néanmoins par la tignasses de leurs chevelures, de force ils seront obligés de rentrer en guerre ” Rabbin Ron Chaya.
Rav Ron Chaya
(English translation)
“… It is marked in the [sacred] texts that at the end of time there will be a great war in the world […] It’s true that everyone feels a bit it’s coming; we do not know when it will happen; it says very clearly that there will be a great war between the West and the East […] but the people [goyim] will see that if they wage war against each other the one that will benefit is in fact the people of Israel. And they will do everything to not go to war yet, dragged by the hair, they will be forced to go to war.” — Rabbi Ron Chaya
============================APPEAL FOR VIDEO EDITING HELP
I got a call from a comrade who said he could not help me financially but let slip that he had been on a cruise a few months back. Now that is disappointing.
I am appealing urgently for a comrade with advanced video editing skills to come HERE and assist Jason Salyers with the videos. My speaking production is exceeding his ability to keep up and yet do the excellent artistic job he has done (with NO prior training!)
If you are a committed white nationalist and believe in the Solutrean cause, I ask you NOW to come here for two weeks and assist us.
Or at least donate so I can hire people.
John de Nugent
213 Ekastown Road
Sarver PA 16055 USA
[20 miles north of Pittsburgh, in western Pennsylvania]
Email:
john@democratic-republicans.us
Telephone: 724.353.0154
Skype:
John de Nugent (Pittsburgh)
Donations:
Cash in an envelope
Blank money order
MoneyGram (send from a Walmart or elsewhere)
Paypal (to “john_denugent@yahoo.com”)
============NEXT BLOG
Some sample chapters, translated from the German, of Michael Winkler’s magnificent book on the ancient Aryan teaching of reincarnation, The Spiritual World.
Leave a Reply