UPDATED TUESDAY MARCH 20

==================

It seems Mark Zuckerberg did not like my post BELOW, for Facebook just deleted my account with 900 friends…..

* * *

Disabled – Organizing or Threatening Violence
Something’s Not Working » Disabled Accounts
Expand All · Share
One of Facebook’s main priorities is the comfort and safety of our members. Your account has been disabled for violating Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities.

Our policies prohibit:

Support for a violent and/or criminal organization or group
Credible threats to harm others or the promotion of self-destructive behavior
Targeting individuals on the site is not allowed
Hate speech or singling people out based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or disease
Graphic content including sadistic displays of violence against people or animals and depictions of sexual assault

For more information about our policies, please see the Facebook Community Standards.

If you believe your account was disabled by mistake, please contact us.
.
.

====================Solutrean raccoons are watching you 😉

When I was raising my two daughters, Ingrid and Erika, teaching them both German and English alongside their mother, who hailed from the Tyrolean Alps in Austria….

 Innsbruck, capital of the Austrian Tyrol (the southern half of Tyrol being in Italy)

….I once vocabulary-quizzed Ingrid as to the name of the animals seen in the pic above.

She replied correctly in German: “Das ist ein Waschbaer!” Then I asked in English: “And in English?” She looked at me as if I were a dummy. “A wash-bear!” 😉

I said, “well, that would be a good name, because they do always wash their face, but it is a ‘raccoon.‘ ”

She scrunched up he face and said teutonically: “I think wash-bear sounds better.” 😉

Many Amerindian words for specifically North American animals such as “raccoon” DO sound strange and alien in English. (The big local river here in Pittsburgh is called in Indian “Allegheny,” an ugly word for a gorgeous current of water, No one I have ever asked likes the word “Allegheny,” and other local-area river names in Amerindian are, yukkh, the Kiskiminetas and the Monongahela (which makes me think of a big, coiled snake with a disease. ;-))

The French called the main river “la belle riviere,” the beautiful river,’ a much nicer designation.)

You can see La Belle Riviere on Freeport Beach in the introductory “God video” here:

https://johndenugent.com/about-john/videos-of-jdn-speaking

A snow scene along “The Beautiful River” at the same location as the video, but a rather different season.

My elder daughter Ingrid, who made me into a double-grandfather in 2010, had a refreshing frankness that one finds in many kids, and this reminds me of the German expression: “Von Kindern und Narren kann man die Wahrheit erfahren.”  (From children and fools the truth exudes.”)
.

She was once seated on my lap in a restaurant and, bored, began examining my tie. She turned it this way and that, studied the underside, flipped it up and down and finally announced a severe judgment: “Daddy, das ist nur ein Spielzeug!!” (“Daddy, this is just a toy!!”) 🙂

I think I fell in her esteem quite a bit, as a 35-year-old adult, still wearing a toy with no visible functionality. 😉

In 1990 running for US Congress in Tennessee, still wearing a tie.

Ingrid (right) and Erika (left) in 1988; Ingrid now has a master’s degree from the elite Duke University in North Carolina, and works in environmental management.

Erika is now a nurse and artist with a bachelor’s degree from the U. of Virginia

.
Another time Ingrid wanted a toy and her mother replied we did not have enough money to buy it. Ingrid retorted with exasperation:

“Mami, geh doch zur Bank und kauf dir das Geld!”

(“Mommie, go to the bank and BUY some money!”) 😉

======================WORLDWIDE VISITORS TO THIS WEBSITE

=======================TIME TO PROMOTE ROCK MUSICIAN TED NUGENT

A very funny guy, politically leaning a bit my way, and suffering no shortage of self-confidence, another Nugent characteristic…..;-)

===============================TOUCHING ENCOUNTER OF A MAN WITH A BULL — AND HIS OWN SOUL

.
“And suddenly, I looked at the bull. He had this innocence that all animals have in their eyes, and he looked at me with this pleading. It was like a cry for justice, deep down inside of me. I describe it as being like a prayer – because if one confesses, it is hoped, that one is forgiven. I felt like the worst shit on earth.”

This photo shows the collapse of Torrero Alvaro Munera, as he realized in the middle of the his last fight… the injustice to the animal. From that day forward he became an opponent of bullfights, which were merely gladiator fights inheited from Roman times, but with man-against-animal.

.

=============VACCINES GIVEN TO CHILD AGAINST PARENTAL WISHES, CAUSING SEVERE PHYSICAL REACTION

To Whom It May Concern,

Parents MUST instruct their children not to allow anyone to inject them with anything.  Once the shots are given, the child and parents will have the problem while the school and medical personnel hide behind secrecy “laws” to protect themselves.

Do parents still think that schools are there to “educate” their children????

In Alberta, they have been discussing the issue that schools should have a nurse on staff.  What for???? So they can suddenly spring this on the kids without anyone knowing????????????????

Wake up parents!!!!!!!!!!!!

Schoolgirl Suffers Adverse Reaction After Four Vaccines At School Without Parental Consent

By Christina England | March 9th, 2012 | Category: Christina England, Top Stories | No Comments »

Many young women are injured by HPV vaccines.

A 14 year girl has had an adverse reaction to one of four vaccines that she received at the Marcus Garvey Academy, Detroit, against her mothers wishes.  On the 30^th January 2012 the young teenager was taken from her classroom without warning and given four vaccinations including the cervical cancer vaccine the HPV, a vaccine her mother was very much against her having.
The first that Ms Sighli Kinney knew about her daughter’s ordeal was when she was handed an envelope containing a vaccination record. Ms Kinney was horrified to read that whilst at school that day her daughter had been given vaccinations for Hepatitis A, influenza, meningitis and HPV even though she had given specific instructions that she did not want her child to receive any kind of medications, including vaccines whilst at school. Ms Kinney was also informed by her daughter that the school nurses had taken a sample of her blood and a sample of urine!
New American news covering the story revealed that as a result of this ‘assault’, the 14 year old had developed a rash covering her body. The report states:
A week after receiving the vaccinations, Kinney’s daughter came down with a rash that spread over her body — what her family doctor determined was an adverse reaction to one or more of the shots. She missed a week of school and her mother became concerned over potential long-term conditions because of the vaccines. [1]
The vaccinations were given to the teenager by nurses from St. John Providence Health System, the company that operates the school’s clinic.
Surely, this is child abuse of the highest order? If I was this child’s mother I would want answers and I would want them now. Ms Kinney is absolutely furious, speaking to news reporters she said: “How are you going to overlook something like this? You injected my child with medicine I never wanted her to have.” (my own emphasis)
True to form the school had a get out clause ready to hand:
“The staff at the clinic must maintain confidentiality with the students and the parents of the students,” the statement read. “Detroit Public Schools staff members are not informed of any services that are provided for any students and this policy is regularly communicated by the clinic staff to the school staff. All paperwork or parent permission slips are provided to students who are instructed by the clinic to return it directly to the nurse.”
Hold on a minute The school staff are not informed of any services that are provided for any students
Why the hell not!!! Does this mean that the nurses can do anything they like to the pupils just as long as they do not tell the staff about it? Does this mean that they are free to test under age children with drugs, vaccines or anything they like, just as long as they keep quiet about it? Talk about ‘See no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil!!!!!!’
It appears that not only do schools have a right to go round giving whatever vaccinations they fancy to our children; they can take their blood and urine as well. I asked Dr Rebecca Carley her opinion on the schools disgusting antics. She said:
Each child attending school has their own private medical doctor, who knows their medical history and is familiar with their health issues.  So why is it that schools are “privately contracting” with medical contractors to deliver drugs to children who they have no medical history for, and no consent from the parents for “treatment”?  Officials at the Detroit public schools stated in this article that they “must maintain confidentiality” and that “staff members are NOT INFORMED of any services provided for the students”.  Thus they are turning over minor children for “unknown services” to “private contractors” that the parents have NOT consented to treat their children!  The West Virginia nurse whose 2 young sons both developed encephalopathy of the brain and are now both permanently brain damaged was NOT given informed consent that this is a known side effect of vaccines.  Since the schools get additional funding for “special needs” (i.e., vaccine induced brain damaged) children, are they promoting this practice to get more funding for the brain damaged children created by this biological assault conducted at the hands of their “private medical contractors”?
Page 9 of publication #99-6194 published by the CDC on May 4, 2000, “Vaccine Information Statements – What You Need to Know” discusses “vaccine-related illnesses, disabilities, injuries or conditions…where deaths occur”.  Children are being assaulted without consent of parents with agents that can cause these vaccine-related illnesses and death.
According to West’s North Carolina General Statutes Annotated, Chapter 14, Subchapter X, Article 36B:  Nuclear, Biological, or Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction:  under Section 14-288.21 (c) (1): THE TERM …”WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, AS USED IN THIS ARTICLE, MEANS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: ANY WEAPON, DEVICE, OR METHOD THAT IS DESIGNED OR HAS THE CAPABILITY TO CAUSE DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY THROUGH THE RELEASE, DISSEMINATION OR IMPACT OF…(B) A DISEASE ORGANISM, OR (C) TOXIC OR POISONOUS CHEMICALS OR THEIR IMMEDIATE PRECURSORS”.
Thus, according to the above definition, the true weapons of mass destruction have been located…in the needles of “private medical contractors” to whom children are turned over without their parents’ consent by school officials, in violation of the Nuremburg code, which states:  “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential…without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion….“
I thought that sending a child to school was to educate them not to have them pumped full of poisons and toxins as soon as their parent’s backs are turned.
It appears not and instead of putting the occasional band aid on and checking for head lice as they did in my day, school nurses have become little more than pharmaceutical companies paid servants and that the term ‘we are only following orders’ still stands.

References
1. Dave Bohon – Parents Fighting Against Gov’t Vaccines Agenda http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/11104-parents-fighting-against-govt-vaccination-agenda

Photo Credit: Lau Lau Chan

Christina England

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specializing in story telling and book buying. In 1978 Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.
After dedicating much of her spare time helping disabled children in a special school, she then worked in a respite unit in a leading teaching hospital.
In 1990 Christina adopted the first of two disabled boys, both with challenging behavior, complex disabilities, and medical needs. In 1999 she was accused of Munchausen by Proxy after many failed attempts to get the boys’ complex needs met. Finally, she was cleared of all accusations after an independent psychologist Lisa Blakemore-Brown gave both boys the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and ADHD as part of a complex tapestry of disorders. During the assessments Ms Blakemore-Brown discovered through the foster care diaries that the eldest boy had reacted adversely to the MMR vaccine.
After taking A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Disabilities Ms. England then spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She went on to gain an HND in journalism and media and is currently writing for the American Chronicle, the Weekly Blitz, VacTruth and Namaste UK on immunization safety and efficacy.
England’s main areas of expertise are researching false allegations of child abuse and adverse reactions to vaccines. Her work is now read internationally and has been translated into many languages. England has been a guest on Holy Hormones Honey – The Greatest Story Never Told! on KRFC FM 88.9 in, Colorado. She has spoken at seminars worldwide and including Canada in 2011 and recently co authored the book ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused?’ with Dr Harold Buttram.

Tags: Adverse Reaction, Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Marcus Garvey Academy, St. John Providence Health System, Vaccine

======================Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential qualifications forged

From Pravda online (Russia)

Opinion » Columnists

Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential qualifications forged
07.03.2012

Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential qualifications forged. 46772.jpeg

By Dianna Cotter

A singularly remarkable event has taken place in the United States of America. This event occurred in Arizona on March 1st and was an earth-shattering revelation.

A long awaited press conference was given by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, a five time elected Sheriff, which should have made national and international headlines. Arpaio’s credentials include serving in the United States Army from 1950 to 1953, service as a federal narcotics agent serving in countries all over the world with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), and served as the head of the Arizona DEA. Without doubt, this is a serious Law Enforcement Officer, not one to be taken in by tin-foil-hat wearing loons.

Yet, in the five days since his revelations there has been little in the way of serious reporting on the findings he presented in his presser. With 6 short videos, the Sheriff and his team presented a devastating case, one the tame US press is apparently unable to report.

On April 27, 2011, President Barack walked into the White House Press room with a Cheshire cat like grin and a “Long Form Birth Certificate” from the State of Hawaii in hand.  From the podium in the press room, Mr. Obama said, “We’re not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by sideshows and carnival barkers,”. Quite the barb from a man holding a forged document.

That’s right, forged.

The president himself created the scene; one filled laughter from an adoring press corp., a scene of unprecedented fanfare while holding a forged document which was later posted on the White House website. This was the news Sheriff Arpaio revealed on March 1, 2012 in Arizona.

Arpaio asserts that his investigators discovered, during a 6 month long investigation which is ongoing, not only was the “Long Form” likely a digitally created forgery, but the presidents Selective Service Card (Draft Card), allegedly filed in 1980, was also a forgery. These documents are what Barack Hussein Obama relies upon to prove his constitutional eligibility to the office of President of the United States.

Forged documents are being used to qualify a President of the United States for the office he holds. Or is usurped the more accurate term?

The silence from the main stream media in the US is deafening. It almost seems as if the press is terrified to even think the question, let alone ask it: Is the President a criminal? The press in Arpaio’s audience were certainly asking him to state precisely that, yet nowhere has the question been asked of the White House by the press. Instead the American Press is aggressively protecting the presumed President of the United States, pushing the fraud upon both America and the world, supporting a man who may well have usurped the office.

For months before Mr. Obama released the April 2011 forgery, American businessman Donald Trump had been demanding that the president show the country definitive proof that he was born in the state of Hawaii, and eligible for the Office of President. The birth certificate forgery which was presented by Mr. Obama was in response to the repeated public requests from the billionaire businessman.

One can easily imagine the reaction of the press had this scenario been about George W. Bush in 2004.

On the contrary, the press itself forged documents regarding the 43rd President: Long term CBS newsman Dan Rather lost his credibility along with his job when he presented forged Air National Guard documents allegedly denigrating the president’s service in the 1970’s. One can imagine the glee evidence presented by law enforcement officials of a real forgery made by President Bush would have generated. The press feeding frenzy would have eclipsed that of Watergate, the most controversial political event in modern America history which led to the resignation of President Nixon in August of 1974.

The questions in the White House Press room would have been merciless to say the very least.

What has been the response from the Obama era press?

Silence.

Silence so loud it can be felt.

What has been the response from the 44th president so far?

A tweet from Obama Campaign press secretary Ben LaBolt, containing a link to the conspiracy theory television show “The X-files” theme song: a mocking, Saul Alinsky like, retort.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors appear to have been committed by the President of the United States or his personal representatives in presenting a forged document to the press and the Nation as a legitimate document, and this information has been delivered from Law Enforcement Officials.

Arpaio refused to take the bait offered by a clearly hostile press in the conference room. He refused to accuse the president directly, instead informing the world that they had a “person of interest” in the forgery, and were continuing with the investigation.

Where is the outrage from the press??

As surreal as this is, it isn’t the main event. It’s only a part of a larger story.

Citizenship

Years before the 2008 election, Barack Obama was involved in efforts to amend the US Constitution to allowthose who were born to parents who were not citizens to become President along with those born overseas. Those efforts have occurred several times in recent history, and all have failed. It must be intelligently asked why this was a concern at all for the then Senator.

There are two reasons for Obama’s concern. The first lay in Article 2 section 1 of the constitution which states:

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President.”

Except for Barack Obama.

The second reason  for Obama’s concern lies in the Supreme Court of the United States case Minor V. Happersett (88 U.S. 162) 1875 which defines Natural Born Citizen:

“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.

This U.S. Supreme Court case decided that Virginia Minor, the plaintiff, could not use the 14th Amendment to claim citizenship and the right to vote because she was a Natural Born Citizen, and therefor unable to lay claim to the statutory citizenship the 14th Amendment gave to former slaves, which included their right to vote. This is the only U.S. Supreme Court case in the history of the United States to clearly define what a Natural Born Citizen is.  It has been cited in dozens of cases since.

This is an issue which cannot be brushed aside by Mr. Obama. His father, Barack Obama Sr. was a student from the British Commonwealth of Kenya, a British Citizen who never sought to become a US Citizen, and indeed was eventually forced to leave the country. Mr. Obama has only one parent who was an American Citizen. Obama clearly does not meet the requirements of Natural Born Citizen as defined by the Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett.

The Founding Fathers, the men who wrote the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, discussed these very reasons why no person of divided loyalties, divided nationalities, should ever have command of America’s armed forces. Dozens of letters and many debates in the constitutional conventions recorded these concerns, always returning the “Law of Nations”, Emerich De Vattel’s encyclopedic record of the laws civilized nations had developed over two thousand years of which the founders were clearly aware of in their debates:

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

E. De Vattel  1758 Sec 212 Ch19

Vattel’s definition has been accepted since the days the United States was still a motley collection of British Colonies. It has been accepted in no less that 3 Supreme Court Cases, has been accepted in testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives. It is by no means an original source; only recently dug out of dusty tomes in 2008. Indeed, this concept is enshrined in every Nation the world over. Every nation not only accepts, but has enshrined this concept: a person born to two parents who were citizens of that nation and born on its soil was a natural born citizen of that nation.

After his rousing 2004 speech at the Democrat National Convention, Barack Obama was considered a shoe-in for running for president in 2008, and indeed his campaign began that night in Boston. Yet his citizenship was a serious obstacle to his ambitions, and the ambitions of the liberal progressive movement which supported him.

So the efforts to obfuscate Obama’s citizenship issues began in earnest. The plan was deviously simple, make certain that people focused on his Hawaiian documents, and minimize the visibility of Minor V. Happersett and Citizenship to the public.

The State of Hawaii

The state of Hawaii’s role in this cannot be neglected for several reasons. Hawaii has a couple of legal Achilles heels of its own.

It was well known at the time, that any person could register the birth of a child in the state on a late form with only the signature of a witness (Hawaii Department of Health no longer uses this form). This means of obtaining Hawaiian documents was used frequently by immigrants who needed assistance from the state (such as welfare), and Hawaii needed the federal dollars registering those births brought to the state. Second, and perhaps most importantly, Federal laws with regard to Hawaii had been written to allow a baby receiving state documents to be declared a Citizen of the United States without being subject to the Jurisdiction of the United States:

A person born in Hawaii on or after August 12, 1898, and before April 30, 1900, is declared to be a citizen of the United States as of April 30, 1900. A person born in Hawaii on or after April 30, 1900, is a citizen of the United States at birth. A person who was a citizen of the Republic of Hawaii on August 12, 1898, is declared to be a citizen of the United States as of April 30, 1900.

Missing from this US Statute is the following which appears in the 14th Amendment:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

This disparity created a legal loophole which is specific to Hawaii: A child born in Hawaii, regardless of whether or not they were born in the state and subject to the Jurisdiction of the United States, automatically gained US Citizenship. This is the only state in the United States where this condition existed. This is why Hawaii is so vitally important to Obama, and could explain why it is important enough to forge birth documents for. It is why Obama’s birth is being alleged to have occurred there instead of somewhere like Washington State or elsewhere, and is so vitally important.

Obama, by being born in Hawaii, got automatic citizenship status in the United States without regard for whether the United States had jurisdiction over his citizenship. Otherwise, his citizenship would have legally followed his father’s, British, as Barack himself admitted on his “Fight the Smears” website during the ’08 campaign.

And it only took a witness signature to gain it. It is unknown how many children gained U.S. citizenship through this means. The real citizenship status of these individuals is similarly unknown, and now that it has been discovered that Barack Obama has put forth a forged Hawaiian Birth certificate, his own proof of birth in the state is subject to serious questions by law enforcement officials.

Months before the election of 2008 Barack Obama began deliberately directing public attention to his Hawaiian Records. The Obama campaign, before redirecting the site to “Attack Watch” maintained the “Fight the Smears” website which can still be found on archival websites. The Obama campaign posted the candidate’s “short Form” birth certificate with the following information from FactCheck.com:

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.”

The campaign obviously wanted public attention directed at his birth documents in Hawaii.

The campaign itself created the entire birth certificate controversy, and acted to maintain and fan the flames of that controversy for several truly simple reasons. As long as the public was wondering about what being born under “the British Nationality Act of 1948” meant,  and the birth certificate “birther” controversy in general, they were not looking into laws which would have legally prevented the senator from assuming the role of candidate and then President. Legal cases such as Minor V. Happersett.

This case was, and still is, of tremendous import. Had it been found during the campaign it would have prevented his candidacy, certainly preventing him from taking the oath of office in Jan 2009.

So a campaign to hide Minor V. Happersett was undertaken at the same time.

Justia

Justia.com is a free legal internet research site with a specific, dedicated Supreme Court of the United States server containing nearly every Supreme Court case in American history. It is specifically marketed to law students, non-profit agencies, startup businesses, small businesses and private internet researchers. In short, those who cannot afford either a lawyer or the thousands of dollars a year required by subscription legal search engines such as LexisNexis and WestLaw. Justia leverages the Google Mini internal search engine, and through this, Google.com itself increasing its visibility on nearly any search of American law. Justia.com is owned by Obama supporter Tim Stanley, and began a systematic scrubbing of Minor V. Happersett  in the summer of 2008, erasing the name and specific text quoted from the case, along with specific citations to it out of dozens of Supreme Court cases which cited it over 138 years of American Supreme Court History. The controversy was dubbed “JustiaGate”.

The author of this article personally documented and published the scrubbing done by Justia, documented the failure of Tim Stanley’s explanation for the “errors”, and assisted in the research which connected Justia.com to Public.Resource.Org, where Stanley is on the board of directors. Public.Resource.org is the source of Supreme Court materials in data form Justia.com receives for publication. Public.Resource.org is owned and run by Carl Malamud, and funded in part by the Center for American Progress once run by John Podesta, and funded by George Soros. This is a direct connection to the Soros Foundation, a major source of political donations to Barack Obama and the Democrat Party.

Justia erased “Minor v. Happersett” along with text quoted from the case out of its Supreme Court servers deliberately in an effort to minimize the ability of the public to find the case by searching for it, significantly reducing its apparent importance.

These two separate efforts, raising the profile of the Senator’s birth certificate in as controversial a manner as possible, while minimizing the legal role of Minor v. Happersett succeeded. Barack Obama was able to illegally win the election, and illegally take office. It was stolen right in front of the American public.

The house of cards is about to come tumbling down around Barack Obama’s ears as the momentum of evidence builds. Law enforcement has found his birth documents to be “highly suspect” as a forgery. His draft card has similarly been found by law enforcement as being “highly suspect” as a forgery. The smoke screen cover created by his birth certificate, hiding Minor v. Happersett in a shadow of false mockery, has been blown away. Leaving the Supreme Court case alone on the stage, glaringly exposing Barack Obama as an usurper, an unconstitutional President of the United States.

The American Press is deliberately hiding the evidence published on the internet about this defrauding of the American public and the deliberate evisceration of the Constitution of the United States. It is hiding Barack Obama’s Fraud as it has been revealed by a Sheriff in Arizona. The silence of the American press would be unbelievable if it weren’t so blatantly obvious.

It is nearly as egregious as the audacity of Obama’s fraud itself.

Dianna Cotter is a Senior at American Military University, a 4.0 Student, the recipient of the Outstanding Student Essay of 2009, a member of Delta Epsilon Tau and Epsilon Pi Phi Academic Fraternities and on the Dean’s and President’s Lists for academic achievement. She has published at Examiner.com, in American Thinker, Accuracy in Media, and Family Security Matters.

.

====================HUMANIMALS AND ARYANS

Account Summary

The mind-blowing irresponsibility of which you speak in your email to me, which has put a ridiculous, heavy and unfair financial burden on you,  appears to me as in a way a further indication of (what may still seem kooky), the ancient Aryan doctrine of reincarnation, which says that most people are still literally animals in their nature, animals with larger brains than before, but selfish, impulsive, ridden with cowardly fear and unable to plan ahead for what is in the best interest of themselves — and of their people whose fate they must share. (They cannot go to the moon. )

Just like a male lion, they are the ultimate in selfishness. It is a known fact that male lions (like male bears) will kill the cubs fathered by other males. (Female bears with cubs hide them from any male bear they see nearby. Male bears are friendly to females, but only when in rut. )

.

John, the book you gave me is truly amazing. I’m disappointed that I put off reading it for a few weeks. I’m halfway through, and let me tell you, this book IS life-changing. If the entire white race read this…. Wow….

Oh, and we get more willpower. 

===============

So, comrade, I am now understanding the greatest task of all: how to reawaken the willpower we will need to survive and thrive. It is no accident that the famous movie about Hitler by Leni Riefenstahl was entitled:

The Triumph of the Will. (278,00 VIEWS ON YT)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBfYncHshJc

We need the willpower to do with our bodies and with our actions what our logical brain and spiritual soul know we must do.

We need to rise above the selfish-terrified-animal stage.

John, these Western Union donations and/or payments are mostly fraudulent. The Jws send these things to us when we are having financial troubles. A friend of mine in Canada received one of these WU payments. He went to the WU store to receive his funds, showed his ID and was arrested.

I had similar experiences when friends sent me emergency funds after I was deported from Canada…I went to the WU outlet to receive my funds…and they made some story on me and called the local police. I HAD TO HURRY AND LEAVE THE PLACE BEFORE THE POLICE SHOWED UP, etc. I WENT THROUGH SIMILAR PROBLEMS IN BOSTON AS WELL.

Stay away from Western Unions…. They don’t like any of us. It seems that the Jws control WU these days. There’s plenty of money for the Jws and their friends, but none for us. 

Best Regards, David von Braun  

++++++++++++to donate

This is how you can help financially: –checks, postal money orders and other money orders that are left blank in the recipient area — or made out to “John de Nugent” $50 in US cash Thursday from the True North, Proud and Free (Canada). The banknote itself honors President (and general) Ulysses Grant, who during the War Between the States (called wrongly the “Civil War” — it was not a war between angry civilians — the French and Germans call it correctly the “Secession War”) banned all Jews from a three-state military district for illegal cotton trading and other swindles. (A panicky Abraham Lincoln had General Halleck order Grant’s order rescinded.)

–sending valuable jewelry or gold coins

–cash in an envelope, even with a fake return address (no risk there!)

–bank wire to my Woodforest bank account (contact me for details at john_denugent@yahoo.com; one comrade does this every month!)

–PAYPAL (write me for details) –gift cards for BestBuy, Walmart, Barnes & Noble bookstores, etc.

I need your donation urgently to pay for the new website and for the final video, which will be the most devastating attack on the Jews FOCUSING ON CHILD MOLESTATION, THE MOST HATED CRIME ON EARTH, and the most inspiring appeal to the Aryan soul inside us, of all times.