Jenkins is the kind of guy we all love to hate, and it was brilliant of the legal team to get an Injun, not a WN, to sue him in conservative Oklahoma, which has both rightwing, Christian southern Whites (who would of course loathe a black, communist queer) and also many, many Amerindians. (The Cherokees were banished by Andrew Jackson to Oklahoma from the East Coast.)
I have had my own experiences with Daryl Lamont Jenkins, the obscenely fat black homosexual communist whose followers phone hotels with death threats to terrorize them into cancelling meetings of WNs.
This is Dainty Daryl, who calls himself AuntiFa ( from “Auntie”, meaning an effeminate queer who takes it up the —, and “AntiFa,” meaning an antifascist, which in reality means a violent terrorist who seeks to injure or kill White Nationalists.
Here is the fat Philly faggot at a Ron Paul rally in 2007, “monitoring” the “hate” of the RP supporters.
Daryl’s One People’s Project has for years gloated as the FBI and the courts unconstitutionally crushed WN groups and leaders. His pet phrase, drippng with Schadenfreude (German for “delight in the suffering of others”) was “next on the white power chopping block” whenever one of us was railroaded to jail.
“Hate Has Consequences” warns the sanctimonious hater.
Jenkins had an entire thread in 2009 defaming me (twice married, with two kids and grandkids, and many girlfriends over the years) as a homosexual, and showed up when my then assistant Henrik Holappa appeared in a federal immigration court in December 2008 to apply for political asylum in the US, then wrote his usual vicious article.
His minions’ modus operandi is to find out the names of hotel personnel and call them at home with death threats. But until now his hate has had no consequences. Maybe that has changed.
As Wiki says (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_People’s_Project)
OPP has published phone numbers, home addresses and workplace addresses of individuals they have identified as being far right and/or racist.
Some jerk told me “I should go out and hold meetings.” I replied:
“We will kill you and your children if the Nazis hold their meeting.”
5 plead guilty in anti-racist attack at Tinley Park restaurant
5:12 p.m. CST, January 4, 2013
- RELATED
- Officials: Tinley Park melee begun by protesters targeting alleged white supremacists
- 10 injured in attack at Tinley Park restaurant
- Five charged in mob attack at Tinley Park restaurant
- Five Indiana men indicted in attack at Tinley Park restaurant
- Hearing for Tinley Park defendants
- Ashford House investigation
- MAPS
- Tinley Park, IL, USA
“We were ready to go to trial,” said Brian Barrido, lawyer for Dylan Sutherlin. “I was very surprised when they said they wanted to take the plea … but I think they did the math, and if the trial didn’t start for a year or six months, they might be out just as soon” as they would under the plea deal.
The five men, all from the Bloomington, Ind., area, are members of the Hoosier Anti-Racist Movement, and had driven to Tinley Park May 19 to confront a group of alleged white supremacists who had planned to meet at the restaurant.
The Sutherlins have maintained they had planned to stage a “peaceful protest,” but security video shows as many as 18 men entering Ashford House, some wearing masks and carrying batons and other club-like objects. Within minutes, a melee broke out among the two groups, and several bystanders also were injured in the scuffle.
In all, the five men faced 37 felony counts, and prosecutors pushed for maximum sentences of 7 years on each, based on the most serious charge, armed violence. The five had balked at that sentence, and their attorneys, all working for free, had planned to go to trial, Barrido said.
As at previous hearings in the case, a crowd of supporters filled the courtroom, many of whom had written character references attesting to the men’s work with charitable organizations — including a domestic violence shelter, Barrido said.
Jason Sutherlin received a 6-year sentence, Dylan and Cody Sutherlin were sentenced to 5 years each, and Stuck and Tucker each received 3 ½ years.
A 2011 WN article on this blatant terrorist:
David Yeagley Sues Thugs Who Shut Down 2010 AR Conference |
Activism; Posted on: 2011-09-02 18:26:36 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ] source: http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=10383 |
The hammer comes down on so-called “anti-racists.”The American Renaissance conference planned for February 2010 had to be cancelled because three successive hotels that had agreed to host the conference were intimidated by “anti-fascist” thugs. We are pleased to learn that one of the speakers scheduled for the conference, David Yeagley [photo below], has filed suit against the “anti-fascists” on charges of conspiracy and tortious interference with contract.It is high time that the shameless attacks on our right to assemble got the response they deserve. Joe Sibley of the Houston, Texas, firm of Camara and Sibley is lead counsel in the case. David Yeagley, the great-great-grandson of the legendary Comanche chief Bad Eagle, has filed charges in Oklahoma state court against Jeffrey Imm (pictured right), Daryl Lamont Jenkins (here), and several other “John Doe” defendants whose names will be added to the suit as their identities become known.According to Dr. Yeagley’s complaint:
He adds the following about the defendants:
Dr. Yeagley is seeking monetary damages for the harm he suffered because of the cancelation, in addition to “unlimited punitive damages” and “such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.” Dr. Yeagley is an accomplished musician, composer, author, and political commentator. His commentaries on American patriotism have so infuriated a few liberal Indians that some have accused him of being an imposter and not really an Indian. When asked about his decision to sue, Dr. Yeagley replied, “It is my cultural and traditional duty to defend my nation. America is my adopted nation, and it is an honor to defend her freedoms. Our freedoms are imperiled by the actions of what amount to liberal racists.” Being a plaintiff in a lawsuit is very burdensome and time-consuming, and we are gratified that Dr. Yeagley has taken this decisive step. Dr. Yeagley is by no means a wealthy man. He manages a small, 501(c)3 educational public charity. We encourage all those who approve of his action against the “anti-fascists” to send a tax-deductible contribution to:
|
Amren civil lawsuit ends in victory
Daryl Lamont Jenkins
Daryle [JdN: I keep seeing different colorful negro spellings of his name…] Lamont Jenkins of One People’s Project ordered to pay $50,000.00 for shutting down 2010 American Renaissance conference
***
JdN: I add the following about Bristow]
Kyle Bristow is a young practicing attorney in Ohio and open WN (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Kyle_Bristow) who wrote the stirring and dramatic novel White Apocalypse, about the White Solutreans form Ice-Age Europe being the true and first Native Americans. (See my essay here: https://johndenugent.com/the-solutreans)
Kyle’s Facebook page as an attorney:
Legal career
France Law Group
Following Bristow’s graduation, he was hired as the junior partner of France Law Group, a northwest Ohio law firm founded by Scott E. France.[44] Although the SPLC has yet to condemn his new activities, in light of having once been labeled “the most annoying snot-nosed college kid,” he gloated, “I’m now an annoying snot-nosed attorney.”[45] Late in 2012, his old associate Van Dyke made headlines representing a woman victimized by a revenge porn website, which posts explicit pictures of women, often submitted by ex-boyfriends, without their consent. Van Dyke got the site shut down as part of a settlement out of court.[46] By the time Van Dyke’s action was reported in December, Bristow was already seeking clients abused by other revenge porn sites.[47] As he explained in comments to theAmerican Freedom Party,
Revenge pornography is nothing more than a manifestation of liberalism. Most victims on revenge pornography websites are young, white, blonde, middle class, American women. Women who the pornographers can link to conservatism or Christianity are especially targeted for harassment.[48]On January 17, 2013, Bristow’s efforts resulted in two more of the abusive sites shuttering their operations; like Van Dyke, he achieved this result without ever going to trial.[49][50][51][52] Less than a year into his professional career, Bristow has been cited as an expert in fighting revenge porn by The Wall Street Journal[53] and the Colorado Springs Independent.[54] On May 22, 2013, Bristow issued a press release calling on Congress to make revenge pornography illegal by making website hosts liable for tortious conduct by users.[55]
In January 2013 Bristow was also added to the National Rifle Association Attorney Referral List.[56] In protest against the American Bar Association‘s support for infringements on the right to bear arms, he resigned from the group on August 24, 2013, issuing an open letter to explain his actions.[57]
Bristow Law
In September 2013 Bristow departed France Law Group and started his own Detroitpractice, Bristow Law, PLLC, in November. He has continued his battle against revenge porn, and was interviewed about the fight by the ABA Journal on November 1, 2013.[58]
In the meantime, a combined re-release of his two book-length works, White Apocalypse / The Conscience of a Right-Winger, saw publication on October 1 of that year.[59]
***
On August 8, 2011, David Yeagley of Oklahoma filed suit against Jeffrey Imm and Daryle Lamont Jenkins in the District Court of Oklahoma, County of Oklahoma for allegedly civilly conspiring and tortiously interfering with his contract to speak at the New Century Foundation’s American Renaissance February 2010 conference.
Tortious interference occurs when a tortfeasor (1) knows of the existence of a contract between the plaintiff and a third party, (2) intentionally or recklessly causes without privilege the contract to be breached, and (3) proximately causes the plaintiff to suffer injury as a result.
Civil conspiracy occurs when a tortfeasor (1) intentionally or recklessly enters into an agreement with a third party (2) to commit an unlawful act, and (3) proximately causes the plaintiff to suffer injury as a result.
Yeagley was represented by Oklahoma Attorney W. Dan Nelson and Texan Attorney Joe Sibley; Imm and Jenkins represented themselves without the assistance of attorneys. The lawsuit sought at least $10,000.00 in damages, but not more than $75,000.00. The reason why the damages were voluntarily capped by the plaintiff is because the cap prevented the defendants from removing the lawsuit from state to federal court through diversity jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction occurs when there is complete diversity between the plaintiffs’ and defendants’ state residencies and the lawsuit seeks over $75,000.00 in damages. The first prong was satisfied through fate; the second prong was prevented from occurring through legal ingenuity.
JdN: Oklahoma is a very conservative state that is both Southern and cowboy in culture, and due north of Texas. Whites engaged in a huge race riot in Tulsa in 1921, resulting in 39 Black fatalities and the entire Black section of town, Greenwood, being expelled from the city after a Black crime wave had driven the Whites to desperate measures.
The reason why state court would arguably be better for the case to be litigated is because state court judges are elected by the public or appointed by the governor and Oklahoma is a conservative state—and would therefore have conservative judges—, while federal judges are appointed by the president of the United States with the consent of the U.S. Senate—and as a result, the federal court that could have otherwise exercised diversity jurisdiction has judges appointed by Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. In theory, a liberal judge would be more likely to rule in favor of the leftist defendants.
It is called “forum shopping” for attorneys to engage in efforts to have their case litigated in a court most likely to render a favorable judgment, and this is an excellent method by which to set the stage for a lawsuit.
According to the complaint filed by Yeagley’s attorneys, the case is “about a Native American patriot who has chosen to take a stand against the enemies of America and the enemies of freedom who promote violence and anarchy.” Describing the defendants as “openly tied to Communists,” the complaint alleges that Imm and Jenkins and their co-conspirators contacted hotels retained to host the American Renaissance conference and “used threats of murder, violence, and other tactics to induce those hotels to breach their contractual agreement to host Plaintiff’s speaking engagement.” The preliminary statement of the complaint palpably declares the intent of the lawsuit: “These terrorists must now be brought to answer for their actions in Oklahoma.”
A few months after the lawsuit was filed, the case against Imm was dismissed—likely because Imm and Yeagley settled out of court. However, on January 17, 2012, Jenkins filed an answer to the complaint and filed a motion to dismiss for an alleged lack of personal jurisdiction.
Jenkins argued in his brief that he has had no contact with Oklahoma and—citing Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com., Inc., 952 F.Supp. 1119 (W.D. Penn. 1997)—that his website— www.onepeoplesproject.com —is a static website in which users from Oklahoma could not interact with it by posting their own content. At about this time, Jenkins deactivated the “legendary” One People’s Project online forum and otherwise made his website less interactive—but changing his website was simply too little and too late to impact the lawsuit.
Yeagley’s attorneys argued in their responsive brief that Jenkins purposefully availed himself to jurisdiction in Oklahoma by intentionally trying to interfere with an Oklahoma citizen’s rights and by having operated a website with features that were interactive to residents of Oklahoma.
After the judge read the briefs submitted by Yeagley’s attorneys and Jenkins concerning the personal jurisdiction issue, the judge decided to overrule Jenkins’ motion. After this event occurred, Yeagley’s attorneys sent Jenkins a series of requests for admissions as part of the pre-trial discovery process.
A request for admissions is basically a series of statements that the litigant is asked to either admit or deny under penalty of perjury. If a party does not respond to a request for admissions within the period of time set forth by the rules of civil procedure—which is often about 30 days but differs from state-to-state—the statements are deemed to be admitted.
Jenkins did not respond to Yeagley’s request for admissions. As such, Jenkins was deemed as a matter of law to have admitted the following averments:
The allegations in Yeagley’s complaint are true and correct.
Jenkins had actual knowledge that Yeagley was a scheduled contracted speaker at the American Renaissance conference.
Jenkins contacted the hotel establishments with threats of violence to cause them to cancel the conference.
That Yeagley suffered damages in the amount of $50,000.00 as a result of Jenkins’ tortious conduct.
With such damning admissions having been made by not responding to the request for admissions, Yeagley’s attorneys had the ammunition they needed to file a motion for summary judgment. A motion for summary judgment is basically a pre-trial motion in which a party asks the judge to skip the trial and rule in their favor because the evidence is undeniably clear.
Yeagley’s motion for summary judgment was filed on December 3, 2013, and Jenkins did not file a responsive brief to it. During the morning of January 3, 2014, a hearing on the motion occurred, and the judge granted it: Jenkins has been ordered by a court of law to pay Yeagley $50,000.00 for shutting down the 2010 American Renaissance conference.
Bolshevik Daryl with Che Guevara
Although the Oklahoma court’s judgment is valid in Oklahoma, Yeagley’s attorneys will need to get the judgment transferred to Pennsylvania to begin collection efforts against Jenkins since he resides there. The process is easy and straightforward, and since Jenkins appeared in Oklahoma state court to contest the case by answering the complaint and filing a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, Jenkins will not be able to make a collateral attack on the judgment in Pennsylvania.
A collateral attack occurs when a party contests the validity of the original judgment that is based not on the foreign court’s rulings, but on the foreign court’s personal jurisdiction over the party when that issue was not decided by the foreign court. This procedural tactic is available only when a default judgment is rendered against a party, which occurs when a party fails to answer the complaint and judgment is automatically made. Since summary judgment was granted, however, the Pennsylvania courts are obligated to honor the Oklahoma court’s decision through the “Full Faith and Credit Clause” of the United States Constitution, which states in part, “Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.” Ironically, the Full Faith and Credit Clause—which will be the cause of the judgment to haunt Jenkins for many years to come—was drafted in the very same city in which Jenkins resides: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Just as the Southern Poverty Law Center has used legal means to shut down right-of-center organizations, the same can be done to violent left-of-center organizations. It is my hope that Yeagley v. Imm et al. was but a trial run (pun intended).
Kyle Bristow is an attorney licensed to practice law in both Michigan and Ohio and serves as the Center for the Advancement of Occidental Culture, LLC’s chief legal officer. Prior to becoming an attorney and practicing law in the areas of criminal and civil litigation, Mr. Bristow wrote and self-published White Apocalypse / The Conscience of a Right-Winger and served as the chairman of the Michigan State University chapter of the Young Americans for Freedom, which was credited with being instrumental in the campaign to outlaw affirmative action in Michigan via ballot initiative in 2006.
…..1920s HITLER IN COLOR — Who’da thunk it?
The normally famous and not infamous “National Geographic Society” published in 2011 a Hitler “documentary” called “Adolf Hitler: Apocalypse.” Though full of the usual Jewish Hitler-bashing and sinister music, with narration by a faggoty-sounding Brit, on tghe other hand it contained 1920s Hitler footage that at doubtless great expense had been COLORIZED!
Soon after it appeared on JewTube it was taken down. But then a Spanish national socialist made this video out of it with the most inspiring scenes and grand music, not the usual eerie, death-camp soundtrack. I just put it up on the WN-owned “TruTube” so European comrades can see it. The “resolution” is not the greatest; I would like to redo this video, and will with your donations, but it is pretty darn good!
This video in my German-language blog already caused views of my blogsite to explode!
Here is the original video on JewTube but in Arabic, since the English was taken down. The Arab narrationb has the one huge advantage that the nasty views of the jews on Adolf are incomprehensible (unless your name is Mohammed). So sit back, sip your beer or red wine, and enjoy in color the Fuehrer and the furor he caused!
Screenshots:
a beautiful Berliner….
The very first film footage EVER of AH, who in 1920 is leaning out past Bavarian flags to see his stormtroopers arrive.
Street battle with the Red Front!
The SA marches past their leader in 1931
…..German government says Windows 8 is verboten for state agencies!
(In German: German gov’t warns all offices against use of Windows 8; I explain that I have used only Linux for five years now. Anyone who uses Windows at this point is suicidal and saying to the Big NSA Jews: “Here, 1) read everything I have, then 2) crash and destroy it whenever you want.”)
Ich benutze seit Jahren nur noch Linux. Wer Windows nach den Dutzenden von Horrormeldungen der letzen Jahre noch immer benutzt, ist hoffnungslos vertrauensselig, blauäugig, gedanklich feige und ein Schlafschaf. Wenn er dann eine Daten- oder Website-Katastrophe erleidet, tut er mir nicht mal mehr Leid. http://www.zeit.de/digital/datenschutz/2013-08/trusted-computing-microsoft-windows-8-nsa/seite-1
My first serious computer work was with a Mac in 1993, and when I had to switch to Windows in a subsequent job, I was stunned how terrible it was. ONLY the backing of the NSA made Windows into the world standard. It is as full of security holes as Swiss cheese, and was designed so the NSA can read all your stuff.
Linux is free and though more trouble initially, Windows is far more trouble inthe long run due to the Trojans, viruses and malware of every sort it attracts and the need to use anti-virus software constantly.
The scam is this: one set of JEWS creates viruses for Windows (an incredible 10% of all Israelis are hackers!!!!!!!!!!) and another set of Hooknoses then sells you anti-virus software. 😉
As the Yiddish expression goes: “Start a fire, sell a fire hose.” 😉
.
.
…..PLEASE HELP ME FINANCIALLY
I would appreciate your providing whatever you can- $1, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100 — or $500, and a former Marine gunnery sergeant recently cut loose for that sum and so did a Scotsman. If a thrifty Scot can give $500, how about an American or Aussie matching him?
In honor of the Marine, the Marine Corps hymn 🙂 :
In honor of the Scot:
“Killecrankie”by “The Picts”, honoring a 1698 victory over an English army
The song is sung in “Scots,” an ancient mix of English und Scottish Gaelic. I love the funny line:
“I fought at land, I fought at sea,
At home I fought my auntie, O;”
Sean Connery
If you want a White Tribe and a tribal religion to give us the inner fire again, and FACE REALITY AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, then I am your man.
I need your financial help to WRITE MY SACRED ARYAN SCRIPTURE FOR OUR FIGHT AND OUR TIMES.
Donations log: https://johndenugent.com/donations-log
Recent donations:
–January 3, 2014 $5 in cahs in aluminum foil from Minnesota
–December 28, 2013 $500 (U.S.dollars) in cash and aluminum foil from Scotland
–December 28, 2013 50 Euros in cash and aluminum foil from H.S., Germany
–December 26, 2013 $25 by cc from M.W., Colorado
–December 21, 2013 $275 by Greendot MoneyPak from R.C., Arizona, $15 via PopMoney from J.M., Oregon and $20 by credit card from T.B., New York City
–December 19, 2013 $100 by credit card from R., Switzerland
How about you?
John de Nugent
681 Canal Road
Apollo PA 15613
john_denugent@yahoo.com
(724) 596-4284
This is how you can help financially:
–via credit card top left or right!
–postal money orders and other money orders that are left blank in the recipient area, or made out to “John de Nugent”(IF STOLEN THEY CAN BE REDEEMED! JUST KEEP THE RECEIPT)
.
–sending valuable jewelry or gold coins
.
–cash in an envelope, even with a fake return address (no risk there!)
.
IF YOU SEND CASH OR COINS, WRAP THEM IN ALUMINUM FOIL!
–PAYPAL (write me at john_denugent@yahoo.com for more details how you can do this, since PP banned me….)
–Your check made out to “John de Nugent”
Leave a Reply