ENGLISH US Supreme Court unanimously approves NDAA provision that military can arrest US civilians — for an indefinite period — for torture — without charges — on any foreign US base such as Guantanamo

……Immediate call for action

.

…..Trespassers beware

A comrade pointed out that it started when one of the two jerks hit the guy’s girlfriend.

I replied:

TRUE! Good catchl I could not believe my eyes but yes, right at the very beginning, the closer one did take a poke at the girl (with her boyfriend walking right next to her….) and this is what triggered it. No wonder the boyfriend went “hot” — this brought out the caveman in him and it was a good, healthy reaction.

I remember reading decades ago a great book by Robert Ardrey called “The Territorial Imperative,” and it pointed out that when an animal is defending his own turf or young in an even fight, he/she is far more likely to win than an aggressor who is trespassing.
.
Our goal now is to restore healthy instincts. We will win by returning to who we are and have been for thousands of years.
.

…..Supremes unanimously approve Obama’s police-state NDAA law!

This bill was first passed into law at the end of 2012. Barack Obama — as US senator Carl Levin of Michigan made clear when a storm of controversy erupted — insisted himself that this provision be inserted into the NDAA, which, as the “National Defense Authorization Act,” is simply the Pentagon’s budget. The part about the US military arresting US civilians on US soil was added BY OBAMA to a routine budget bill.

This gives Obama the “right” to have the Pentagon pick YOU up and waterboard you for ten years straight or forever without charges or a lawyer at Guantanamo. All you have to be “guilty” of is being pro-Constitution, guns or heterosexual marriage, all of which Homeland Security, under the lesbian Jewess Janet Winer Napolitano, declared to be “domestic extremism.”

Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act):

• National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Pub.L. 112–81. This NDAA contains several controversial sections (see article), the chief being §§ 1021-1022, which affirm provisions authorizing the indefinite military detention of civilians, including U.S. citizens, without habeas corpus or due process, contained in the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), Pub.L. 107–40.^[3]

A decision from the U.S. Supreme Court means the federal government now has an open door to “detain as a threat to national security anyone viewed as a troublemaker,” critics of the high court’s ruling said.

The high court by its own order this week refused to review an appellate-level decision that says the president and U.S. military can arrest and indefinitely detain individuals.

Officials with William J. Olson, P.C., a firm that filed an amicus brief asking the court to step in, noted that not a single justice dissented from the denial of certiorari.

[JdN: No surprise here: The court is now heavily Jewish and homosexual, and sees regular Americans who believe in God, guns, Constitution, heterosexual family, products MADE IN USA  and that only US citizens should be hired for jobs, not illegal aliens, as THE ENEMY who might rise up with those guns against them and the whole judeophilic, plutocratic terror regime that pays their obscene Supreme Court salaries. As to why Chief Justice John Roberts, who loathes Obama (and vice versa — Obama voted against his confirmation when he was a US senator from Illinois), voted for this unspeakable outrage, which RAPES the US Constitution, one can only speculate: did he get a massive bribe, was he threatened with terrifying blackmail (over pedophilia or homosexuality?), or was it even both?]

“The court ducked, having no appetite to confront both political parties in order to protect the citizens from military detention,” the legal team told WND. “The government has won, creating a tragic moment for the people – and what will someday be viewed as an embarrassment for the court.”

WND reported earlier when the indefinite detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act were adopted, then later challenged in court.

The controversial provision authorizes the military, under presidential authority, to arrest, kidnap, detain without trial and hold indefinitely American citizens thought to “represent an enduring security threat to the United States.”

Journalist Chris Hedges was among the plaintiffs charging the law could be used to target journalists who report on terror-related issues.

A friend-of-the-court brief submitted in the case stated: “The central question now before this court is whether the federal judiciary will stand idly by while Congress and the president establish the legal framework for the establishment of a

police state and the subjugation of the American citizenry through the threat of indefinite military arrest and detention, without the right to counsel, the right to confront one’s accusers, or the right to trial.”

The brief was submitted to the Supreme Court by attorneys with the U.S. Justice Foundation of Ramona, California; Friedman Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein of Lake Success, New York; and William J. Olson, P.C. of Vienna, Virginia.

The attorneys are Michael Connelly, Steven J. Harfenist, William J. Olson, Herbert W. Titus, John S. Miles, Jeremiah L. Morgan and Robert J. Olson.

They were adding their voices to the chorus asking the Supreme Court to overturn the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said the plaintiffs didn’t have standing to challenge the law adopted by Congress.

The brief was on behalf of U.S. Rep. Steve Stockman, Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall, Virginia Sen. Dick Black, the U.S. Justice Foundation, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Center for Media & Democracy, Downsize DC Foundation, Downsize DC.org, Free Speech Defense & Education Fund, Free Speech Coalition, Western Journalism Center, The Lincoln Institute, Institute on the Constitution, Abraham Lincoln Foundation and Conservative Legal Defense & Education Fund.

The 2014 NDAA was fast-tracked through the U.S. Senate, with no time for discussion or amendments, while most Americans were distracted by the scandal surrounding A&E’s troubles with “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson.

Eighty-five of 100 senators voted in favor of the new version of the NDAA, which had already been quietly passed by the House of Representatives.

Hedges, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, and others filed a lawsuit in 2012 against the Obama administration to challenge the legality of an earlier version of the NDAA.

It is Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA, and its successors, that drew a lawsuit by Hedges, Daniel Ellsberg, Jennifer Bolen, Noam Chomsky, Alex O’Brien, Kai Warg All, Brigitta Jonsottir and the group U.S. Day of Rage. Many of the plaintiffs are authors or reporters who stated that the threat of indefinite detention by the U.S. military already had altered their activities.

Video mania: The instruction manual on how to restore America to what it once was: “Taking America Back” on DVD. This package also includes the “Tea Party at Sea” DVD.

“It’s clearly unconstitutional,” Hedges said of the bill. “It is a huge and egregious assault against our democracy. It overturns over 200 years of law, which has kept the military out of domestic policing.”

Hedges is a former foreign correspondent for the New York Times and was part of a team of reporters awarded a Pulitzer Prize in 2002 for the paper’s coverage of global terrorism.

The friend-of-the-court brief warned the precedent “leaves American citizens vulnerable to arrest and detention, without the protection of the Bill of Rights, under either the plaintiff’s or the government’s theory of the case.

“The judiciary must not await subsequent litigation to resolve this issue, as the nature of military detention is that American citizens then would have no adequate legal remedy,” the brief explained.

“Once again, the U.S. Supreme Court has shown itself to be an advocate for the government, no matter how illegal its action, rather than a champion of the Constitution and, by extension, the American people,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute.

“No matter what the Obama administration may say to the contrary, actions speak louder than words, and history shows that the U.S. government is not averse to locking up its own citizens for its own purposes. What the NDAA does is open the door for the government to detain as a threat to national security anyone viewed as a troublemaker.

“According to government guidelines for identifying domestic extremists – a word used interchangeably with terrorists, that technically applies to anyone exercising their First Amendment rights in order to criticize the government,” he said.

It’s not like rounding up innocent U.S. citizens and stuffing them into prison camps hasn’t already happened.

In 1944, the government rounded up thousands of Japanese Americans and locked them up, under the approval of the high court in its Korematsu v. United States decision.

The newest authorizes the president to use “all necessary and appropriate force” to jail those “suspected” of helping terrorists.

The Obama administration had claimed in court that the NDAA does not apply to American citizens, but Rutherford attorneys said the language of the law “is so unconstitutionally broad and vague as to open the door to arrest and indefinite detentions for speech and political activity that might be critical of the government.”

The law specifically allows for the arrests of those who “associate” or “substantially support” terror groups.

“These terms, however, are not defined in the statute, and the government itself is unable to say who exactly is subject to indefinite detention based upon these terms, leaving them open to wide-ranging interpretations which threaten those engaging in legitimate First Amendment activities,” Rutherford officials reported.

At the trial court level, on Sept. 12, 2012, U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest of the Southern District Court of New York ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and placed a permanent injunction on the indefinite detention provision.

Obama then appealed, and his judges on the 2nd Circuit authorized the government detention program.

Since the fight started, multiple states have passed laws banning its enforcement inside those states. Herb Titus, a constitutional expert, previously told WND Forrest’s ruling underscored “the arrogance of the current regime, in that they will not answer questions that they ought to answer to a judge because they don’t think they have to.”

The judge explained that the plaintiffs alleged paragraph 1021 is “constitutionally infirm, violating both their free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the 1st Amendment as well due process rights guaranteed by the 5th Amendment.”

She noted the government “did not call any witnesses, submit any documentary evidence or file any declarations.”

“It must be said that it would have been a rather simple matter for the government to have stated that as to these plaintiffs and the conduct as to which they would testify, that [paragraph] 1021 did not and would not apply, if indeed it did or would not,” she wrote.

Instead, the administration only responded with, “I’m not authorized to make specific representations regarding specific people.”

“The court’s attempt to avoid having to deal with the constitutional aspects of the challenge was by providing the government with prompt notice in the form of declarations and depositions of the … conduct in which plaintiffs are involved and which they claim places them in fear of military detention,” she wrote. “To put it bluntly, to eliminate these plaintiffs’ standing simply by representing that their conduct does not fall within the scope of 1021 would have been simple. The government chose not to do so – thereby ensuring standing and requiring this court to reach the merits of the instant motion.

“Plaintiffs have stated a more than plausible claim that the statute inappropriately encroaches on their rights under the 1st Amendment,” she wrote.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/supreme-court-green-lights-detention-of-americans/#woTZrCHEg2aELxYs.99

…..This is why I must run for President starting right away for 2016

Americans must have a counter-leader, a counter-President, to stand up and DECLARE with authority  TO THE US MILITARY AND POLICE that THIS REGIME IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL and ILLEGAL and under their sworn oath as police and military to the US Constitution THEY MUST NOT OBEY IT.

And with Whites now less than 50% of the population, we MUST ally ourselves with the main antisemitic group in America, African-Americans, 39% of whom recently stated in a poll they would NOT vote for Barack Obama again.

According to the poll, 80% of the polled Caucasians would not vote for Obama if given a second chance, and 39% of African-Americans agree. Shockingly, 100% of the polled Hispanics said they regretted re-electing Obama. Even more surprisingly, 84% of the polled women say they regret voting for Obama, while 61% of men agree.

Here’s the one that will really get you thinking. 55% of Democrats say they would not vote for Obama again, while 71% of Independents agree. This is significant because Independents are widely seen as the deciders for almost every election.

As this article by a huge Jewish organization proves, http://archive.adl.org/presrele/asus_12/6154_12.html… “29% of African-Americans hold antisemitic views.”

This is double the White percentage, 14%!

I need to make it clear to African-Americans (as this essay explains in detail: https://johndenugent.com/for-african-americans-part-1) that:

1) the Jews started and ran the slave trade;

2) the Jews destroyed their heroes Marcus Garvey, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King;

3) the Jews started the crack cocaine epidemic to destroy the Black community

4) the Jews are now destroying the unskilled members of the Black working class by bringing in Mexicans to take their jobs

5) the Jews are behind the end of prayer in schools and the entire homosexual agenda which bothers many Black people a lot

And with the huge new Donald Sterling scandal, they need to know that this lawyer-real-esate-magnate “Sterling” is in reality a JEW — and his real name is Tokowitz!

http://www.johndenugent.com/english/english-donald-sterling-scandal-let-the-truth-widen-the-already-large-black-jewish-rift

And they need to know what the Talmud, the “holy book” of Jewry, says about Black people!

–the Talmud says Blacks are monkey with giant penises

–the Talmud says their ancestor was Ham, and he sexually molested his own father Noah (yes, that Noah of the Bible story of the Flood)

–Tokowitz said “in Israel Blacks are treated lower than dogs”

African-Americans need to know their TRUE friends outside thier own community, which is only 13% o9f the US population now, are not the Jews, not Wall Street, not the Chinese, not the Koreans, NOT THE SELL-OUT BLACK “ELITE,”  and not the Jew-run federal government, NOR THE HALF-JEWISH CIA AGENT OBAMA, but only enlightened, intelligent, brave, compassionate, pro-constitution, pro-family White people who now feel – and are — equally oppressed by the Jew and his CHINESE ALLY! 

.

…..THE PRESIDENTIAL FLYER

This may be the

REAL PRESIDENT!

N-o-t Obama

John de Nugent — former Marine, high-honors Georgetown graduate, father and leader

– and EMERGENCY, PROVISIONAL President of the Americans!

(“Provisional” until a real election can happen, not yet another miserable choice that every 4 years Wall Street gives us between 2 RICH, PAID-TO-LIE PUPPETS)

I as President will bring back the economy by five clear steps:

1) CANCELLING ALLDEBTS

(Wikipedia: “$50.7 trillion in debt are owed by US households, businesses, and governments”!)

After WWII Germany CANCELED ITS DEBTS and though 80% destroyed by war, today Germany is the richest country in Europe! The Europeans now beg Germany to bail THEM out! We Americans, like Germany after the war, must be DEBT-FREE! We cannot EVER pay off $50 TRILLION in debts to Wall Street! Cancel all debts. Start fresh! To hell with financial vultures and their bonuses!

2. JOBS FOR AMERICANS, not CHINESE & MEXICANS

3. STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS (paid under-the-table to drive down our wages; 95% of illegals do jobs Americans arehappy to do; only 5% pick vegetables! They are in factories, driving trucks, and doing roofing and carpentry!)

4) A NEW, NON-PROFIT NATIONAL BANK to make ZERO-INTEREST LOANS to CONSUMERS and BUSINESSES – get the money to Main Street, not crooks on Wall Street!

Who runs the puppet US government? Why does it never obey “The People”?

This is whom it obeys: Take out a

ONE-DOLLAR BILL!

FLIP it over!! LOOK at it right now!!! They’re LAUGHING at you!!!!

Go to my website JOHNDENUGENT.ORG, and learn the truth about the ECONOMY, the MEDIA, 9/11, JERRY SANDUSKY, the NUMEC nuclear CANCER EPIDEMIC in western Pennsylvania, why kids are getting AUTISM, and why DRUGS are taking over our towns. (I’ll tell you what a fellow Marine revealed, his hands shaking in remorse.)

I am your FEDERALLY REGISTERED CANDIDATE FOR US PRESIDENT in 2016! This is the start of something BIG! Build for the next election – in 2016! Stop voting for the lesser of two evils. That ‘s WHY America’s becoming evil — ‘cuz we keep VOTING it IN! And the very act of voting them in makes these puppets seem “legit”!

NOW select the real choice!

John de Nugent, US Marine, at your service!

.

site: johndenugent.COM

tel: (724)596-4268

email: john_denugent@yahoo.com

.

…..PLEASE HELP ME FINANCIALLY

I need your financial help to WRITE MY SACRED ARYAN SCRIPTURE FOR US AND OUR TIMES, and prepare a new political alliance — and run for President in 2016 as the head of a NEW multiracial coalition against the real problem, the Jews! Others have been making big sacrifices. But I have gotten in just $150 all month so far and we have to move in one week! (The owners are moving back into the house we rented from them from Sept. 2012 to now.) And the Jews just cancelled my credit card donations!

https://johndenugent.com/donations-log

How about you?

John de Nugent

PO BOX 43

Apollo PA 15613

john_denugent@yahoo.com

(724) 596-4284

This is how you can help financially:

postal money orders and other money orders that are left blank in the recipient area, or made out to “John de Nugent” ( IF STOLEN THEY CAN BE REDEEMED! JUST KEEP THE RECEIPT) sending valuable jewelry or gold coins cash in an envelope, even with a fake return address (no risk there!) IF YOU SEND CASH OR COINS, WRAP THEM IN ALUMINUM FOIL! PAYPAL (write me at john_denugent@yahoo.com for more details how you can do this, since PP banned me….)

 

checks made out to “John de Nugent” now that I again have a bank account, in fact, via STEALTH, I have now two.

John de Nugent

681 Canal Road

Apollo PA 15613

john_denugent@yahoo.com

(724) 596-4284