ARTICLE FRANCAIS A DROITE/DEUTSCHER ARTIKEL RECHTS
===========conclusion of yesterday’s post
My computer had problems yesterday and I apologize for not being able to finish editing the Friday blogpost.
Here is the important end of yesterday’s post (found here: https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/03/05/english-introducing-the-apiru-the-ancient-and-modern-nomadic-crime-family/):
* * *
And as the scientists and historians know, the already mixed apiru horde were mixed in the eighth century AD by the converting to Judaism of the atrocity-loving Khazars, yet another barbarous and parasitical ethnie. (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazar)
I explain:
Everything began to explain the Jews by a meeting with Gypsies – who are thieves in America as in Europe, with faces like the criminals, fences, thieves and bogus fortune-tellers that they are. Then I read in an encyclopedia that they “left” India a thousand years ago for Europe. This raises the question: why does a people just “leave” its country?
For fear of being hanged or beheaded? For fear of being massacred at the hands of kings and peoples who were enraged by their behavior?
The “Rom,” a large component of the Gypsies, “leave” India…..
And another thing:
There was in Virginia in the United States an Edgar Cayce, a very internationally famous supposed “psychic” in his day ( “a household word” as we say in the United States) who, I was informed by a Cayce fan, wrote a book never published in which he said that juze were “reincarnated criminals.” Whether one believes in reincarnation or not, this is quite a memorable statement.
This decision goes back, among other reasons, to articles I found in Wikipedia in English, German and in French, saying clearly that the people whom the Old Testament calls “the Jews” (and earlier haclled the “Hebrews”) are likely the descendants of the “Habirus” — and these “Habirus” or “apirus” were in actuality a gang of criminals wandering around in the Middle East as outlaws, a horde which already annoyed the leaders of the Sumerian empire, and Hittite, Egyptian and Assyrian.
English ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru ):
Habiru (Ha biru) or gold cApiru pr.w (Egyptian) [1] was the name given by various Sumerian, Egyptian, Akkadian, Hittite, Mitanni, and Ugaritic sources (dated, roughly, from before 2000 BC to around 1200 BC) to a group of people living as nomadic invaders in areas of the Fertile Crescent from Northeastern Mesopotamia and Iran to the borders of Egypt in Canaan [2] Depending on the source and epoch, these Habiru are variously described as nomadic or semi-nomadic, rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, archers, servants, slaves, migrant laborers, etc.
In French ( http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru):
Habiru, Abirou, Hapirou Habiru is the name given by many sources, Sumerian, Egyptian, Akkadian, Hittite, Mitannite and Ugaritic (dating approximately from -2000 to -1200) to a category of the population of north-west Mesopotamia and the Fertile Crescent from the borders of Egypt, Canaan and Iran. The portrait it draws of Habiru varies by source and the time they are nomadic, semi-sedentary, living outside the law, marginal, rebels, mercenaries, slaves, migrant workers, etc..
[….] Sumerian documents from the reign of Shulgi, king of Ur v. -2150, describe “a people traveling without clothing, in deathly silence, destroying everything in its path, the men go where they please, planting their tents and their camps, and they live in the countryside without observing the decrees of my king.”
In watching the documentary film of the prestigious Channel 4 in England “Ice Age Columbus” (= “The Christopher Columbuses [who came to America in Ice Age times, thus the Solutreans]) seen in the second part the actions of “exiles” roamed in the era of hunters and gatherers of the Stone Age. They were the criminals, psychopaths, thieves, murderers, antisocial elements. Either they were killed/executed/lynched or in misplaced mercy they were merely driven away.
Zia of the Solutreans, now in North America, finds that exiled Solutrean criminals have also crossed the Atlantic and have crept up upon them, armed. Exiles banded together just as decent people did. (Zia and other Solutreans may have had dark hair and fair skin and light eyes as depicted, or some may have been blond. The warlike Aryans thousands of years later were definitely blond-haired.)
The head of the exile band threatens Zia’s brother with a razor-sharp spear and confiscates their boat.
But in the forest, they picked up other misfits, and became the leaders or followers in new clans of desperados…… We must remember that Europe back then was not overpopulated but drastically underpopulated, a nearly empty continent with vast forests as in the story of “Little Red Riding Hood,’ not wall-to-wall cities, suburbs and towns. It offered plenty of space to highwaymen (and also to Robin Hood types).
In medieval Germany the forest (as in this depiction of the fairy tale) meant a place women and girls would not walk through alone, whether due to animal- or to human-wolves. As late as the 1700s there were many still apiru (juish) criminals lurking in the southern German forests.
And antisocial females would join them ….. or normal women would be abducted so the sociopathic clan had females for sex and cooking.
Amerindians with their pitiful white female captives.
And this union produced babies …..
Then an entire tribe ….. then a whole “people “……or anti-people.
To designate the southern Italian Mafia in the United States, we often use the term “crime family.” This expresses that the various mafias are more than mere “companies” or “organizations.” They are real clans, bands of people, united by feelings of belonging and by ties of marriage, blood and/or friendship as well as by greed and self-interest. They are “fraternal” organizations, exhibiting a sordid solidarity (aside from the occasional assassinations among leaders).
My volunteer from New Zealand, Nelson1805 (whose writings I often have featured on this blog, see https://johndenugent.com/jdn/?s=nelson1805) has described in a brilliant report to me the Khazars — the ancestors of 90 percent of Jews today) and how he traced the Khazar aristocracy back to the Scythians, a largely white, Old Iranian and blond tribe of barbaric psychopaths.
(As Wikipedia reveals, the lower-class Khazars were swarthy Caucasoids who were genetically like the Armenians, Chechens, and Georgians of today, such as the Georgian mega-psychopath Josehp Stalin).
Stalin as a young Bolshevik, bank robber and hitman. Note the semito-caucasian nose, and the eyes.
But these Scythians were a horrible, savage and barbaric horde, white though they were. They were Aryans psychopaths, roaming around what is now Ukraine, and a tribe that the ancient Greek historian Herodotus denounced for their cruelty.
We can safely extrapolate from the movie “Ice Age Columbus” that for thousands of years various exiled or escaped individuals since at least the Ice Age have been forming clans of criminals, and I vbelive basd on my research into the apiru that exactly just such a criminal clan was at the origin of the Jews, and of the Scythians (who later were known as Khazars and became converted to Judaism), and they became the Gypsies and other wandering peoples who have always terrified decent village people for millennia as soon as they approached any permanent human settlement.
Thus the juze are not a pure race of any kind, but instead a breeding community that has collected criminals for thousands of years and allowed them to join their horde and that now numbers in the tens of millions around the world.
Israelis delight in the recent assassination of a Hamas official. Six Mossad operatives using genuine but stolen passports of several European nations invaded a Palestinian’s hotel room, and strangled him, and it is a cause for national celebration in Israel, a country whose name in Hebrew means, yes, as an angel said after Jacob wrestled with him: “He fights against God.” Isra (he fights against)-el (God)…..
As the Romans used to say, Nomen est omen, “the name is the omen.”
Israeli-British musician Gilad Atzmon comments (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/israeli-pride-ii.html):
The Zionist dream is over. The attempt to become a people like other people has failed.
We are dealing here with a bloodthirsty tribal society on the verge of collective psychosis.
Sorry, Gilad, but though you are one of the brave and sincere people who are trying to change jewry, this apiru people has ALWAYS been psychopathic in its very origins.
* * *
SEE “ICE AGE COLUMBUS”!
FIRST OF NINE PARTS ON YT (very high-quality resolution):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX7imQJbelY
(Hearing-impaired: Double-click on this video, then on lower right click also on the icon “CC” = close-captioned]
=================NINETY PERCENT OF SOUTH AFRICAN FARMS GIVEN TO BLACKS HAVE FAILED
SHOCKER: BBC Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8547621.stm
South Africa: 2010: 90% of White Farms handed over to Blacks have FAILED!
Date Posted: Thursday 04-Mar-2010
[A comrade writes: Well, we have been saying this and predicting this for the last 10 years, and here it is. Years ago I posted an article saying that 80% of black self-help projects in South Africa have failed. The list of failures goes on and on.
Now think about this: These farms, in white hands made monies, and profit. They employed large numbers of blacks AND they paid tax to a black Govt. Now… they don’t employ people, they don’t produce food AND the Govt has to pump money into them which is still not saving them.
Robert Mugabe, the black Racist Communist mocked us whites back in 2000. He asked the question: “Can only White people farm?” He pooh poohed the idea. Well, Robert Mugabe, apparently, the answer is: YES, ONLY WHITE PEOPLE CAN FARM IN AFRICA AND BLACK PEOPLE CAN’T!!
BTW, I doubt any white farmers want their land back now because the farms have been totally broken. The infrastructure is broken and nothing works any more. The blacks can now keep it and can try to build up the farms FROM SCRATCH LIKE THE WHITES ORIGINALLY DID! Good luck boys!!! Jan]
Some 90% of farms redistributed to South Africa’s black population from white farmers are not productive, the government has said.
Land reform minister Gugile Nkwinti warned the land might be repossessed if the farms continued to fail.
Almost 60,000 sq km (23,000 sq miles) have been redistributed under policies aimed at benefiting black people who were left impoverished by apartheid.
The land was bought from white farmers who sold up voluntarily.
The BBC’s Pumza Fihlani in Johannesburg says some black farmers are likely to argue that they have been struggling to get the resources and skills to develop their land.
And repossessing the land would provide a whole new problem for the government, our correspondent says, as any move to return the land to its former white owners is bound to be controversial.
Sensitive issue
The government had set a target of 2014 to redistribute one-third of white-owned land back to the black majority.
But Mr Nkwinti acknowledged that the deadline would not be kept.
He said the focus would now shift to helping the black farmers make their land productive.
“The farms – which were active accruing revenue for the state – were handed over to people, and more than 90% of those are not functional,” he said.
“They are not productive, and therefore the state loses the revenue. We cannot afford to go on like that… No country can afford that.”
At the end of apartheid in 1994 almost 90% of land was owned by the white community, which made up less than 10% of the population.
Land reform is a sensitive issue in South Africa and has been brought into sharp focus by the decline of agriculture in neighbouring Zimbabwe, where many white commercial farmers have been violently evicted.
* * *
Posted By: Jan
AfricanCrisis Webmaster
Author of: Government by Deception
==================
From an email by fearless activist and patriot Jerry Heinemann, a big man with a huge white family, and a real mountain man for freedom in West Virginia, a leader in the Reform Party (that once was run by Ross Perot and Pat Buchanan) here is something that Eternal Solutreans can learn from.
(Heinemann’s organization is http://www.reformpartyusa-ag.org/reform_party_001.htm)
* * *
REVISITING ‘THE SHOCK DOCTRINE’ IN THE WAKE OF HAITI !
In the aftermath of the 12 January 2010 earthquake that ravaged (and continues to ravage) Haiti, as we witness the bravery and dignity of survivors and relief workers, we are wise to examine the deeper outlines of the historical roots that created the conditions for such a massive loss of life. We must simultaneously, however, begin to ponder what lies ahead for the people of Haiti as they emerge from the immediate calamity of the quake. As Naomi Klein meticulously revealed in her 2007 book, The Shock Doctrine, we understand that disasters of this kind can be moments of great upheaval and uncertainty, and that in these moments space is created that paves the way for new policies and new realities to emerge.
In the following excerpt from her book, Klein explores those who were able to resist the worst inclinations of ‘disaster capitalism’ – in this case Thai villagers whose homes were decimated by the India Ocean tsunami – by harnessing the power of community and solidarity to supplant the role that financial interests and neo-liberal elites sought to play in the aftermath of crisis:
“Despite all the successful attempts to exploit the 2004 tsunami, memory also proved to be an effective tool of resistance in some areas where it struck, particularly in Thailand . Dozens of coastal villages were flattened by the wave, but unlike in Sri Lanka, many Thai settlements were successfully rebuilt within months. The difference did not come from the government. Thailand’s politicians were just as eager as those elsewhere to use the storm as an excuse to evict fishing people and hand over land tenure to large resorts. Yet what set Thailand apart was that villagers approached all government promises with intense skepticism and refused to wait patiently in camps for an official reconstruction plan. Instead, within weeks, hundreds of villagers engaged in what they called land ‘reinvasions.’
They marched past the armed guards on the payroll of developers, tools in hand, and began marking off the sites where their old houses had been. In some cases, reconstruction began immediately. ‘I am willing to bet my life on this land, because it is ours,’ said Ratree Kongwatmai, who lost most of her family in the tsunami.
The most daring reinvasions were performed by Thailand ‘s indigenous fishing peoples called the Moken, or ‘sea gypsies.’ After centuries of disenfranchisement, the Moken had no illusions that a benevolent state would give them a decent piece of land in exchange for the coastal properties that had been seized.
So, in one dramatic case, the residents of the Ban Tung Wah Village in the Phang Nga province ‘gathered themselves together and marched right back home, where they encircled their wrecked village with rope, in a symbolic gesture to mark their land ownership,’ explained a report by a Thai NGO. ‘With the entire community camping out there, it became difficult for the authorities to chase them away, especially given the intense media attention being focused on tsunami rehabilitation.’ In the end, the villagers negotiated a deal with the government to give up part of their oceanfront property in exchange for legal security on the rest of their ancestral land. Today, the rebuilt village is a showcase of Moken culture, complete with museum, community centre, school and market. ‘Now, officials from the sub-district come to Ban Tung Wah to learn about “people-managed tsunami rehabilitation” while researchers and university students turn up there by the bus-full to study ‘indigenous people’s wisdom.’
All along the Thai coast where the tsunami hit, this kind of direct-action reconstruction is the norm. The key to their success, community leaders say, is that ‘people negotiate for their land rights from a position of being in occupation’; some have dubbed the practice ‘negotiating with your hands.’
Thailand’s survivors have also insisted on a different kind of aid – rather than settling for handouts, they have demanded the tools to carry out their own reconstruction. Dozens of Thai architecture students and professors, for example, volunteered to help community members design their new houses and draw their own rebuilding plans; master boat builders trained villagers to make their own, more sophisticated fishing vessels. The results are communities stronger than they were before the wave. The houses on stilts built by Thai villagers in Ban Tung Wah and Baan Nairai are beautiful and sturdy; they are also cheaper, larger and cooler than the sweltering prefab cubicles on offer there from foreign contractors. A manifesto drafted by a coalition of Thai tsunami survivor communities explains the philosophy: ‘The rebuilding work should be done by local communities themselves, as much as possible. Keep contractors out, let communities take responsibility for their own housing.’
Uniting all these examples of people rebuilding for themselves is a common theme: participants say they are not just repairing buildings but healing themselves. It makes perfect sense. The universal experience of living through a great shock is the feeling of being completely powerless: in the face of awesome forces, parents lose the ability to save their children, spouses are separated, homes – places of protection – become death traps.
The best way to recover from helplessness turns out to be helping – having the right to be part of a communal recovery. ‘Reopening our school says this is a very special community, tied together by more than location but by spirituality, by bloodlines and by a desire to come home,’ said the assistant principal of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary School in the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans.”
Naomi Klein is an award-winning journalist and syndicated columnist and the author of the international and New York Times bestseller The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, now out in paperback. Her earlier books include the international best-seller, No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies (which has just been re-published in a special 10th Anniversary Edition); and the collection Fences and Windows: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate (2002). To read all her latest writing visit < www.naomiklein.org >. Published on Friday 22 January 2010 by CommonDreams.org; http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/22-11
For the record, the above example was recently followed by the indigenous people of Vancouver, Canada, in the poorest postal zone in Canada, during the recent 2010 Winter Olympics when these Folks were forcibly removed from their dwellings to make room for Olympic-condos, etc. After their homes were seized & demolished – the community of persons took-back possession of the vacant lots via erecting & occupying a “tent-city”! In order to settle the standoff – the Vancouver City Council agreed to resettle the residents into a new development of social housing! See < http://www.democracynow.org/2010/3/2/in_the_shadow_of_the_olympic >!
=========THOMAS JEFFERSON, ADOLF HITLER AND ETERNAL SOLUTREA
A comrade wrote me asking if I thought that Hitler’s so-called Zweites Buch (“Second Book”, 1928) was genuine.
I replied:
* * *
It is hard to say if The Second Book, supposedly written by Hitler in 1928, is real. We have only a typed manuscript, as with “Goebbels’ diary,” and it was “discovered in a safe after the war” by a US Army ju…….
As for the book itself, the writing is much better than in Mein Kampf — short sentences.
It was written (if genuine) right after a severe defeat: The National Socialists got only 2.6 percent of the vote in March 1928!
it is interesting in that it shows an evolving understanding of the United States — both as a country with a big racial movement in the 1920s but also very ju-controlled. In the 1920s the US experienced
1) the famous Henry Ford book The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem
Ford was one of the most famous men in the world and was beloved by workers for having doubled wages in 1914.
2) the second rise of the Ku Klux Klan (Wikipedia suggests http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan that 15 percent of the US white male adult population was in the Klan!),
The Klan boomed between 1920 and 1925 and held a huge march in downtown Washington DC. (After 1944 the Klan adopted the Confederate battle flag as its main banner.)
3) restrictions on immigration so as to favor Britain, Germany and northern Europe, thus nordic immigrants, and
4) eugenics laws were passed to sterilize the retarded.
On the other hand, the author saw huge juish power and thought it would win. And that the United States would become the greatest threat ever to the white race and to Germany.
The book has a long defense of Hitler’s offer of friendship to Mussolini.
What it shows me, if it is true, is a Hitler focused on what was good for Germany.
But a pan-Aryan approach would have won the war. Louis Céline (this Wikipedia article is slanted but accurate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis-Ferdinand_C%C3%A9line) was a great French novelist and also a medical doctor. He knew the world very well from his travels to Africa, the United States (where he worked as a doctor, in Detroit) and elsewhere. Wikipedia admits that his “Journey to the End of the Night is among the most acclaimed novels of the 20th century.”
As soon as Hitler in 1940 began working with Marshal Pétain, Céline let out a groan and confided to his diary that this meant Germany would lose the war. Germany just wanted satraps, cooperative local rulers.
But Céline saw that the French were ready in 1940 for a Parti de travailleurs nationaux-socialistes français! For a new deal for the French working class — freedom from hyper-capitalism and a celebration of the dignity of work! Justice and prosperity for all the nation, not slaving for the ju and the white psychopath!
As my blogpost here shows — https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/02/05/en-fr-de-paris-under-german-occupation-a-romp-obama-outsourced/ — the French in 1940 were VERY IMPRESSED with the Germans. How could they not be, to be beaten in six weeks (and the British too, although Hitler let them go at Dunkirk), and yet defeated without brutality, and the Germans behaved very well ….and also looked wonderful with their steeled bodies and perfect uniforms.
Céline was convinced that the French were READY for an exciting, liberating, revolutionary idea and for a partnership with Germany. Remember, he was a bestselling author in France; he knew the French people.
One could add that Himmler gave a speech where he admitted that over and over various German officers on the Eastern Front had proposed a National Socialist Russian Workers Party to rally the Russians to the German side — which he and Hitler rejected, as they rejected two offers by Vlassov to create a Russian National Liberation Army!
Though Hitler said famously to Degrelle that he was not a German or a European but a Hellene, in realty he was a German, and his political testament does not even mention the white race or other nations, only Germany.
https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/02/25/english-the-eternal-solutreans-begin/
A friend who is a paleo-conservative with his own website and fellow former Marine asked me what my stance was about Hitler. I said: let’s think in terms of the German philosopher Hegel.
–The thesis is Thomas Jefferson in 1776, a red-headed Kelt who demanded freedom for all whites who come to America;
–the antithesis is Adolf Hitler in 1933, no freedom, but a folk community, and yet designed for German rule of Europe;
–the synthesis is Solutrea in 2010, freedom and folk community for ALL loyal Aryans.
We live and learn. The wise among us learn our painful lessons in each life, and grow to be a new person, as Dr. Pierce said, on the upward path.
https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/02/25/english-the-eternal-solutreans-begin/
That post and video of the 24th of February were designed for true Solutreans. The rest of the whites will die out, these Walmart waddlers.
We, the Solutrean people, will survive, and, like a rose, be beautiful for our people and a thorn if grabbed.
John de Nugent
Leave a Reply