…..Hideous, neanderthalic Jewess screams abuse at BNP activists peacefully demonstrating against Third World fake refugees
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do-C0i57QMA
.
Jez Turner is the man speaking in much of the video. He is a British Nationalist who studied at the very prestigious London School of Economics. He is a Pashtun speaker who served as an Officer in the Royal Signal Corps. Jez is the creator and Chairman of the London Forum IONA.
.
Metapedia:
.
Jeremy Bedford-Turner, also known as Jez Turner, is a patriotic activist in the United Kingdom, who is best known as the organiser of the IONA London Forum. This club was founded in August 2011 after he was pushed out of the London New Right by Troy Southgate.
I support you 100%. And as a former military man myself, I see in you, who served your flag in uniform as I did, the same martial spirit that any real white man must have — and especially at this critical juncture in world history.
.
I posted underneath two separate comments. Pls note especially my comment about females. I am moving forward with a new religion because women cannot see in their hormonal rage how they are slitting their own throats and those of their own children.
.
Religion, aside from other issues, is the best way to get out-of-control women back under the rule of reason and reality.
.
Women are naturally religious in every nation on earth and need to be honored, appreciated and protected, not used by leftists who are out only to destroy them and our whole race.
Jez Turner is a real MAN. He is speaking the truth and he did NOT say ‘kill immigrants in the Chunnel.’ He said “traitors,” meaning white indigenous Britons who betray their own nation. I suggest the irate cool down and watch the video again.
Btw, If you look at the leftist crowd, it is 80% females. The Founding Fathers of the US, back in 1788, decided women should not have the vote, period. (They got it in the UK in 1918, in the US in 1920 and only in 1945 in France.) Why not? Not lack of brains. But the problem is most (not all) are estrogen-omaniacs… overwhelmed by maternal FEELINGS and utterly daft nurturing instincts, misdirected by the left now toward the poor blax-jews-muslims-refugees-poofters, etc. ad infinitum. Compassion — for our mortal enemies! And the enemies ESPECIALLY of white women and girls! Hormone-induced MADNESS! Have these ditsy women already forgotten 1,400 white, native English children raped by Muslim immigrants in Rotherham, Yorkshire, and the leftist-intimidated, pro-migrant police arresting frantic fathers trying to rescue them? Women need to be honored, appreciated and protected, not used by leftists who are out only to destroy them and our whole race.
.
…..Why Germany became so strong
You know, in Germany they would say “the army is the school of the nation” — which is exactly why we no longer have universal military service. 😉
The Germans even retrained their aging and retired infantry NCOs (sergeants) as elementary-school teachers.
What can one do with whites who denounce any act of courage as scaring the cowardly public off?
“The growing number of large families is driven by rising levels of immigration, and particularly by women from Pakistan and Bangladesh, says Ann Buchanan, professor of social work at the University of Oxford.”
But all they show is pix of nordic people! How cynical!
Telegraph.co.uk
HOME»NEWS»UK NEWS»IMMIGRATION
End of 2.4 children, as Britain has biggest families in Europe
More four-baby families in Britain than almost all of Europe, with immigration a major factor
A family sit together outside their house Photo: Alamy
Matthew Holehouse By Matthew Holehouse, in Brussels7:01PM BST 16 Aug 2015
It is the end of two point four children.The shape of families in Britain is changing radically, new figures show, with the country now home to some of the biggest in Europe.
.
Immigration – and an apparent trend for the very wealthy to have more babies – has left Britain with some of the largest families in 40 years.
.
The UK is now home to more families containing four or more children than at any time since the early 1970s.
.
The trend comes at the same time as the average family size is shrinking. It suggests parents are becoming increasing divided between the haves and have-nots, with only children, and multiple births, becoming more common at the expense of the two-child nuclear family.
.
New data from Eurostat, the European statistics agency, shows a growing trend for large families.
.
In 2013 some 9.5 per cent of babies born in the UK had three or more older siblings.
.
It was the highest level since 1970, and marked a steep climb from 2009, when the figure was just 5.3 per cent. It shows that a growing number of women are choosing to have bigger families than the previous generation.
.
It gives Britain some of the largest families in Europe. The rate was exceeded only by Finland across 31 European states, and is nearly double the EU average of 5.6 per cent.
.
It shows that four-baby families are far more common than in many Catholic countries, where large numbers of offspring were once the norm. In Italy, just 3.1 per cent of babies had three siblings, while the rate was 2.6 per cent in Spain and 4.6 per cent in Poland.
. A family out together for a walk Photo: Alamy
.
The mini-baby boom comes despite a general trend of women having fewer children. The average woman in Britain, on reaching 45, has had 1.9 children. That compares with 2.35 for a 45-year old woman living in 1985. The change has been driven by greater numbers of women going to work.
.
The growing number of large families is driven by rising levels of immigration, and particularly by women from Pakistan and Bangladesh, says Ann Buchanan, professor of social work at the University of Oxford.
.
Often, women from overseas bring a culture of high birth rates – something that is exaggerated as research suggests migrants often delay having children until they reach a new country, at which point the high-birth rates occur. As migrants then integrate, later generations tend to have fewer children.
.
Data from the 2011 census suggests the average Afghan-born woman living in the UK has 4.25 children, while the average Pakistani-born woman has 3.82 children. That compares with a rate of 2.19 for women living in the UK who were born in one of the 12 eastern European states, and 1.79 for UK-born mothers. Among the lowest are Australian and New Zealanders, at 1.38.
.
The proportion of babies delivered in the UK to foreign-born mothers has risen markedly since 1997, to 26 per cent in 2013.
.
At the same time, she said there is also anecdotal evidence to suggest the “one per cent” of richest women in Britain, who can afford a nanny or a career break, are having large numbers of children as a way of displaying their wealth, Prof Buchanan said, although there is little academic research that has been done to explore this theory.
.
She identified Victoria Beckham, a mother of four, and Helena Morrissey, the chief executive of City firm Newton Investment Management and a mother of nine, as such women.
.
“At the other end of the scale, there is a small number of very rich families – such as Helena Morrissey – who are having nine children plus,” said Prof Buchanan.
.
“These are women who are highly educated, and had high-powered jobs before. They can afford to choose.”
…..Hideous, neanderthalic Jewess screams abuse at BNP activists peacefully demonstrating against Third World fake refugees
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do-C0i57QMA
.
Jeremy Bedford-Turner, also known as Jez Turner, is a patriotic activist in the United Kingdom, who is best known as the organiser of the IONA London Forum. This club was founded in August 2011 after he was pushed out of the London New Right by Troy Southgate.
.
He studied at the London School of Economics, before a spell of twelve years in British Army in theRoyal Signals Corps (as part of this he learned Pashto). Bedford-Turner claims he was forced out of the military, due to attending a British People’s Party meeting in 2008. He was a member of the National Front as a young man and while a student in 1992 stood for election for them in Twickenham. He is a member of the Friends of Oswald Mosley and has interests in the Historical Review Press.
.
Btw, If you look at the leftist crowd, it is 80% females. The Founding Fathers of the US, back in 1788, decided women should not have the vote, period. (They got it in the UK in 1918, in the US in 1920 and only in 1945 in France.) Why not? Not lack of brains. But the problem is most (not all) are estrogen-omaniacs… overwhelmed by maternal FEELINGS and utterly daft nurturing instincts, misdirected by the left now toward the poor blax-jews-muslims-refugees-poofters, etc. ad infinitum. Compassion — for our mortal enemies! And the enemies ESPECIALLY of white women and girls! Hormone-induced MADNESS! Have these ditsy women already forgotten 1,400 white, native English children raped by Muslim immigrants in Rotherham, Yorkshire, and the leftist-intimidated, pro-migrant police arresting frantic fathers trying to rescue them? Women need to be honored, appreciated and protected, not used by leftists who are out only to destroy them and our whole race.
.
…..Why Germany became so strong
You know, in Germany they would say “the army is the school of the nation” — which is exactly why we no longer have universal military service. 😉
The Germans even retrained their aging and retired infantry NCOs (sergeants) as elementary-school teachers.
What can one do with whites who denounce any act of courage as scaring the cowardly public off?
.
…..”Daily Telegraph” thinks we all are IDIOTS
.
Un-freaking-believably misleading article — look at the pic first: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11806379/End-of-2.4-children-as-Britain-has-biggest-families-in-Europe.html
Halfway down:
“The growing number of large families is driven by rising levels of immigration, and particularly by women from Pakistan and Bangladesh, says Ann Buchanan, professor of social work at the University of Oxford.”
But all they show is pix of nordic people! How cynical!
Telegraph.co.uk
HOME»NEWS»UK NEWS»IMMIGRATION
End of 2.4 children, as Britain has biggest families in Europe
More four-baby families in Britain than almost all of Europe, with immigration a major factor
A family sit together outside their house Photo: Alamy
Matthew Holehouse By Matthew Holehouse, in Brussels7:01PM BST 16 Aug 2015
It is the end of two point four children.The shape of families in Britain is changing radically, new figures show, with the country now home to some of the biggest in Europe.
.
Immigration – and an apparent trend for the very wealthy to have more babies – has left Britain with some of the largest families in 40 years.
.
The UK is now home to more families containing four or more children than at any time since the early 1970s.
.
The trend comes at the same time as the average family size is shrinking. It suggests parents are becoming increasing divided between the haves and have-nots, with only children, and multiple births, becoming more common at the expense of the two-child nuclear family.
.
New data from Eurostat, the European statistics agency, shows a growing trend for large families.
.
In 2013 some 9.5 per cent of babies born in the UK had three or more older siblings.
.
It was the highest level since 1970, and marked a steep climb from 2009, when the figure was just 5.3 per cent. It shows that a growing number of women are choosing to have bigger families than the previous generation.
.
It gives Britain some of the largest families in Europe. The rate was exceeded only by Finland across 31 European states, and is nearly double the EU average of 5.6 per cent.
.
It shows that four-baby families are far more common than in many Catholic countries, where large numbers of offspring were once the norm. In Italy, just 3.1 per cent of babies had three siblings, while the rate was 2.6 per cent in Spain and 4.6 per cent in Poland.
.
A family out together for a walk Photo: Alamy
The mini-baby boom comes despite a general trend of women having fewer children. The average woman in Britain, on reaching 45, has had 1.9 children. That compares with 2.35 for a 45-year old woman living in 1985. The change has been driven by greater numbers of women going to work.
.
The growing number of large families is driven by rising levels of immigration, and particularly by women from Pakistan and Bangladesh, says Ann Buchanan, professor of social work at the University of Oxford.
.
Often, women from overseas bring a culture of high birth rates – something that is exaggerated as research suggests migrants often delay having children until they reach a new country, at which point the high-birth rates occur. As migrants then integrate, later generations tend to have fewer children.
.
Data from the 2011 census suggests the average Afghan-born woman living in the UK has 4.25 children, while the average Pakistani-born woman has 3.82 children. That compares with a rate of 2.19 for women living in the UK who were born in one of the 12 eastern European states, and 1.79 for UK-born mothers. Among the lowest are Australian and New Zealanders, at 1.38.
.
The proportion of babies delivered in the UK to foreign-born mothers has risen markedly since 1997, to 26 per cent in 2013.
.
At the same time, she said there is also anecdotal evidence to suggest the “one per cent” of richest women in Britain, who can afford a nanny or a career break, are having large numbers of children as a way of displaying their wealth, Prof Buchanan said, although there is little academic research that has been done to explore this theory.
.
She identified Victoria Beckham, a mother of four, and Helena Morrissey, the chief executive of City firm Newton Investment Management and a mother of nine, as such women.
.
“At the other end of the scale, there is a small number of very rich families – such as Helena Morrissey – who are having nine children plus,” said Prof Buchanan.
.
“These are women who are highly educated, and had high-powered jobs before. They can afford to choose.”
[end]