This proves we need to ban all knives, or they will be used to commit serious thought crimes. 😉

.

“F*** Joe Biden” could be heard among the roadside gathering in a video posted to TikTok.

“Welcome to Scranton, PA. Joe,” the video’s caption reads.https://t.co/FYZ9Hcx8r5

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) October 26, 2021

.

….Brave, brilliant Lord Northcliffe, a powerful early press baron, turned against the Jews in 1922, was declared insane, and “died” within a month in an asylum 

The French troops also forced German workers at the point of a rifle to haul German coal out of mines, put it on trains, and send it for free over to France.

Poland and Czechoslovakia were also harshly mistreating their German minorities, whom the Versailles Treaty had put by naked force into their Slavic and very anti-German countries.

The Germans, under Versailles, were the whipped negroes of Europe, broke financially — and morally and financially broken as well. Six years later, Wall Street in Jew York City also gave Germany the Great Depression, this to complete the bankruptcy of the country.

…DM article on meds that shrink your brain

[JdN: Again, the founder of the popular newspaper Daily Mail in London, alarmed by the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as were many other prominent whites worldwide when they were published in translation in 1919,  turned against the Jews in the 1920s, was declared insane overnight, confined to an asylum, and murdered there.

Bust of Lord Northcliffe; his own doctor was bribed to declare he was insane to a judge, who in turn was bribed to confine him to an asylum, where the “help” poisoned him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

The DM has 100 MILLION visitors a month! BUT IT NEVER BRINGS UP THE JEWS.

Not one word on how Lord Northcliffe was declared insane and murdered! See Northcliffe article further below.]

Common medicines including cold and flu tablets, heartburn drugs and sleeping pills ‘SHRINK the brain and slow down thinking’

• Ingredients promethazine and diphenhydramine ‘slowed brain function’
• Block chemical acetylcholine involved in transmitting electrical impulses
• Researchers said the drugs had an effect for a month after treatment  
• A full list of implicated medications can be viewed at Ageing Brain Care 
• Or scroll down for a full list of the medications listed in the study

By Colin Fernandez, Science Correspondent For The Daily Mail

Published: 10:00 EST, 18 April 2016 | Updated: 23:50 EST, 18 April 2016

Common over-the-counter medicines should be avoided by older people as they have been linked to memory loss and problems in thinking, scientists have discovered.

Treatments for colds and flu, hay fever, allergy and heartburn tablets containing anti-cholinergic drugs had the effect for one month after treatment, a study found.

Effects associated with taking the drugs included having slower brain processing times and smaller brains overall.

Well-known treatments including the heartburn medicine Zantac, Night Nurse Liquid containing Promethazine and the sleeping tablet Nytol, containing diphenhydramine, are included among drugs that may result in the effects, the research said.

+2

Over the counter treatments for cold, flu, heartburn and sleeping tablets were found to block the chemical acetylcholine, which is involved in the transmission of electrical impulses between nerve cells.

The drugs block the chemical acetylcholine, which is involved in the transmission of electrical impulses between nerve cells.

The treatments are prescribed for a wide range of conditions, including Parkinson’s disease, over-active bladder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nausea and vomiting, sleeping problems, high blood pressure, depression and psychosis.

But the authors warn: ˜Use of AC [anti-cholinergic] medication among older adults should likely be discouraged if alternative therapies are available.’

Previous studies have linked the drugs with cognitive impairment, increased risk of dementia and falls.

However, the new study by Indiana University School of Medicine, is the first to explore their impact on brain metabolism and atrophy through brain scans.

Dr Shannon Risacher, the university’s assistant professor of radiology and imaging sciences, said: ˜These findings provide us with a much better understanding of how this class of drugs may act upon the brain in ways that might raise the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia,’

˜Given all the research evidence, physicians might want to consider alternatives to anticholinergic medications if available when working with their older patients.

˜The impact of these drugs have been know about for over a decade, with a 2013 study finding drugs with a strong anticholinergic effect cause cognitive problems when taken continuously for as few as 60 days. Drugs with a weaker effect could cause impairment within 90 days.’

.

Many over-the-counter medicines have been linked to slower brain processing times and smaller brains.

The new study involved 451 participants, 60 of whom were taking at least one medication with medium or high anticholinergic activity.

The participants were drawn from a national Alzheimer’s research project – the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative – and the Indiana Memory and Ageing Study.

To identify possible physical and physiological changes that could be associated with the reported effects, researchers assessed the results of memory and other cognitive tests, positron emission tests (PET) measuring brain metabolism, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for brain structure.

Patients taking anticholinergic drugs performed worse than older adults not taking the drugs on short-term memory and some tests of executive function, which cover a range of activities such as verbal reasoning, planning, and problem solving.

Anticholinergic drug users also showed lower levels of glucose metabolism – a biomarker for brain activity – in both the overall brain and in the hippocampus, a region of the brain associated with memory and which has been identified as affected early by Alzheimer’s disease.

The researchers also found significant links between brain structure revealed by the MRI scans and anticholinergic drug use, with the participants using anticholinergic drugs having reduced brain volume and larger ventricles, the cavities inside the brain.

Professor Risacher added: “These findings might give us clues to the biological basis for the cognitive problems associated with anticholinergic drugs, but additional studies are needed if we are to truly understand the mechanisms involved.’

The study was published in the journal JAMA Neurology.

John Smith, Chief Executive of the Proprietary Association of Great Britain, which represents makers of over-the-counter medicines, said the medicines linked to the study were not intended to be used on a daily basis.

.

Anticholinergic medicines include some over-the-counter allergy and cold and flu products. However they are intended for short-term relief of symptoms only.

He said: “It is important to note that the JAMA study only involved people with a mean age of 73 in what the researchers conceded was a small sample.

The study followed people who took medicines that were low, medium or high in anticholinergic activity, and concluded that the use of medication with medium or high anticholinergic activity should be discouraged in older adults if alternative therapies are available.

‘However, due to the study limitations, the researchers propose that further and more advanced studies are needed.

“Anticholinergic medicines include some over-the-counter allergy and cold and flu products but these are intended for short term relief of symptoms and not for continuous use as in the research.

˜If anyone has any concerns about their medicine, we would advise them to talk to their pharmacist.

‘There is a range of different allergy, cold and flu products on the market which contain different ingredients, many of which were not considered in this study, and a pharmacist will be able to recommend a suitable product.

“All over-the-counter medicines in the UK have been approved by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and are rigorously assessed for safety and efficacy.

‘Once on the market, their safety is continually monitored in light of any emerging evidence.’

…..The panicked Jews had press baron Lord Northcliffe declared insane, confined and killed

And note that for seven years years now GOVERNMENT AGENTS Don Black of Stormfront, and David Duke, have spread that I am insane.

November 2008, Memphis, Tennessee (l-to-r) Agent Henrik Holappa; myself; Paul Fromm of Canada; agent David Duke; Russian lawyer mistress of Duke; Danish comrade; James Edwards of the Political Cesspool radio show; Derek Black (who, appalled, publicly abandoned white nationalism in a letter to the SPLC); and his father, agent Don Black, whose wife Chloe works for the Jew sugar billionaire Fanjul family. https://johndenugent.com/english/why-i-retaliate-stormfronter-don-blacks-income-source-jewish-fanjul-sugar-billionaires-has-repeated-domestic-violence-and-drunkenness-scandals/

In Donald Black’s March 2009 attack on me, coordinated down to the day with the Homeland Security raid that arrested my assistant Henrik Holappa anfdöputz him in solitary for 87 days on a fictitious “visa overstay,” Black stated on a major Stormfront thread that I urgently needed to see a psychiatrist. Then he deleted my thread on SF with 264,000 views.

Now you now why I fight back so viciously and constantly against them and all their allies but not yet against Daily Stormer), and I stay armed at every second of day and night.

The accusation of insanity is the prelude to the SWAT team and death by bullet, poisoned food, withheld meds, or injection. (Ask Edgar Steele — of course, by seance.)

Railroaded into prison on a murder conspiracy charge on the testimony of a convicted, violent felon.

Driven from prison to prison to prison to prison and no mail was forwarded (called “diesel therapy”) in order to torture him psychologically; then he was denied meds here at Victorville in California for his heart condition until he died.

If a WN, they NEVER put you in a prison near your family. Ask Shaun Walker, onetime chairman of hte National Alliance. Living in California, he got five years for a bar fight with a Mexican with no injuries, and was sent to a fed prison in Minnesota, two thousand miles away. I AM THE ONE WHO GOT WALKER OUT AFTER TWO YEARS.

And I repeat to “law enforcement” (and I got a scowl the other day from one, who recognized me),

If you come for me, an expert with the .45 pistol and the head shot, there will be a lethal gun battle, exactly as with Robert Mathews, who went down firing and even fired at the feds from inside his bathtub until they burned him alive by setting his cabin on fire with red hot tear gas grenade canisters.

I will go on to my next life, dying like a white man, and you will suffer the horrific karma of a traitor to your race and folk.

Robert Mathews — when info and talk is not enough http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jay_Mathews

I actually heard Mathews’s most famous speech — in Chicago in 1983 — right before he went underground. https://johndenugent.com/english/tom-metzger-on-david-duke-robert-mathews-electrifying-speech/

Just think — by dying as a man, Mathews missed out on 9/11, gay marriage, fisting classes in public schools, chemtrails, mandatory vaccines, the autism epidemic, and on Hillary Clinton! He could have been a bitter old 63-year-old prisoner today in a federal supermax full of negroes, crack dealers, pedophiles and serial killers!

…..Jewish Terror: The Story of Lord Northcliffe

http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/04/jewish-terror-the-story-of-lord-northcliffe-2/

by Kevin Alfred Strom

American Dissident Voices broadcast of January 10, 2004
listen to the broadcast (mp3) Lord Northcliffe (pictured) was a victim of the Zionist establishment whose story deserves to be told, though it was covered up for decades. The lessons for us as a people in his story are deep and profound.

THE PRESS MAGNATE Alfred Harmsworth, later Britain’s Lord Northcliffe, once said: “News is what someone, somewhere is trying to suppress; the rest is just advertising.” Despite the fact that he was one of the most powerful men in what was then the British Empire, Northcliffe would eventually pay for that attitude with his life.

Northcliffe’s fall ” from being one of the most powerful men in the world to being imprisoned as insane after which he quickly died ” took only a few days. The trigger was his challenge to the Jewish power structure.

Northcliffe, who lived from 1865 to 1922, stood up to the political establishment of his time, damning Lord Kitchener during World War I when he was considered a war hero ” and thereby engendering the hatred of millions and driving the circulation of his flagship paper down by some 80 per cent. He emerged victorious, just as he had in earlier decades when his business acumen and editorial skill had made him the outright owner of the two of the most widely read newspapers in Britain (and many other periodicals) and the majority proprietor of the then-leading newspaper in the world, The Times of London. Lord Northcliffe was possibly the earliest example of the modern press baron.

Northcliffe was a man who was a bit of a jingoistic nationalist ” he took regrettable anti-German and anti-Boer positions, for example ” and it is said that he would do almost anything to increase the circulation of the newspapers that he owned. Douglas Reed, in his interesting book The Controversy of Zion, writes “He was sometimes right and sometimes wrong in the causes he launched or espoused, but he was independent and unpurchasable. He somewhat resembled Mr. Randolph Hearst and Colonel Robert McCormick in America, which is to say that he would do many things to increase the circulation of his newspapers, but only within the limits of national interest; he would not peddle blasphemy, obscenity, libel or sedition. He could not be cowed and was a force in the land.”

Northcliffe, the son of an English barrister, was born Alfred Harmsworth near Dublin on the 15th of July 1865. With his brother Harold (later Lord Rothermere) he started the magazine Answers to Correspondents in 1888, which rapidly became a success with its question-and-answer format, selling over a million copies a week. He then founded a children’s newspaper, Comic Cuts, a woman’s magazine, Forget-Me-Nots, purchased the bankrupt Evening News and made it a success by modernizing it, and founded the revolutionary Daily Mail, which pioneered low-cost production, lavish use of illustrations, the smaller tabloid paper size, terse, fact-filled writing, sports and women’s sections, serial novels, and banner headlines. By the time of the Boer war, the paper sold a million copies a day. Harmsworth took what he considered a patriotic position, stating that the Mail stood for “the power, the supremacy and the greatness of the British Empire.”

The part-Jewish publisher Joseph Pulitzer was so impressed with Harmsworth’s talents that he hired him to edit the first edition of his brand new New York World on the first day of the twentieth century, which he did ” using the tabloid (meaning compressed) size which he had pioneered and named, and which later become the dominant format for British newspapers.

One failure of Northcliffe was his launching of the first daily newspaper for women, the Daily Mirror, which did eventually become a success when he made it into a picture newspaper for both sexes. He took his losses and accepted his defeat with philosophy and humor, saying “Disaster may often be changed to triumph by alteration in tactics. The faculty of knowing when you are beaten is much more valuable than the faculty of thinking you are not beaten when you are.

I had for many years a theory that a daily newspaper for women was in urgent request, and I started one. The belief cost me £100,000. I found out that I was beaten. Women don’t want a daily paper of their own. It was another instance of the failures made by a mere man in diagnosing women’s needs.

Some people say that a woman never really knows what she wants. It is certain she knew what she didn’t want. She didn’t want the Daily Mirror.”

It was in 1905, the same year that he purchased The Times and the Sunday Observer, that his achievements were recognized by his being made Lord Northcliffe at 40, the youngest-ever peer of the realm. [ http://tinyurl.com/2wfla ]

The First World War was a tragedy of bloodletting, destruction, and death for millions of the best young men of our European race on every side of the conflict — a tragedy from which we have still not yet recovered.

Its origins are lost in obscure and shifting alliances, commercial jealousy, and the cynical balance of power’ policy favored by the British Empire at the expense of pan-European interests.

Its end was a farrago of madness in which avarice, revenge, crackpot ‘liberal’ nuttiness, and Zionism dominated.

It is this last item — ‘ Zionism’ — with which we are, and Lord Northcliffe was concerned.

According to a defector from the Jewish power structure of the time, Benjamin Freedman, Britain was on the verge of losing that war in 1917, when the Zionist Jews made a proposal to the British government. Britain could yet win this war, the Zionists argued, if America could be brought into the conflict on Britain’s side.

With their already-substantial control of the American press, and with their tight circle of ‘advisors’ around President Wilson (who was beholden to them because of indiscreet letters in their possession which he had written to a woman not his wife), the Zionists made a good case that they could deliver what they promised.

But there was a price to be paid. The British Empire was at that time administering the small Middle Eastern territory of Palestine, populated mainly by Palestinian Arabs and Christians and with only a small minority of Jews. The Zionist Jews coveted that territory which later became Israel when their land-grab came to fruition. And their price for bringing American soldiers to die in Flanders fields was a declaration from Britain that the Empire favored the establishment of a Jewish state there.

The price was paid. Lord Milner and Foreign Minister Balfour drafted “The Balfour Declaration” and the puppeteers pulled the strings on crackpot Wilson, and America went to war to “make the world safe for democracy’ and to “end war,” proving that many Americans had had their brains turned to mush long before the advent of television.

The scholar Revilo Oliver has stated that Milner’s interest in supporting the Zionists, apart from the immediate objective of winning the war, was in removing as many Jews as possible from Britain, and giving them their own country thousands of miles away seemed as good a way of doing that as any.

Similar motives animated Balfour, as I stated on this program last year:

“Balfour’s naiveté [is] in this case, a stand-in and symbol of White naiveté in general. The Jews wanted a policy statement from the then-dominant world power, the British Empire, and they got it and used it to the hilt, not hesitating to kill Britons when it suited them, as in the Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel, [ http://tinyurl.com/m2xn ] and while other Jews were, especially after World War II, doing everything in their power to undermine the status of the White nations, including Britain. The Zionist entity has outlasted the British Empire which gave it birth, though Little Britain is still of some assistance in some projects, like the murder of Iraqis, currently being undertaken by the self-styled masters of the world.

What’s really interesting about Balfour, who gave the Jews their foothold in Palestine, was that he didn’t particularly like Jews — and that he was a racialist.

Like Adolf Hitler later, Balfour was enamoured of the idea of the Jews leaving Europe to found their own state elsewhere.

Both men negotiated with Zionist Jews to effect that end. Hitler offered them Madagascar in 1938. In 1903, while he was Prime Minister, Balfour offered them Uganda. In debates on the Alien Act of 1905, Balfour sought to cut off Jewish immigration into Britain.

Balfour openly admitted in 1914 (to leading Zionist Chaim Weizmann, no less) that he shared the extreme anti-Jewish sentiments of Cosima Wagner. Balfour [even] spoke against Jewish immigration in the House of Commons.”

After the war, Lord Northcliffe became alarmed by Zionist ambitions and Jewish power. In 1920, he publicized the book that has been banned and furiously denounced by the Jews perhaps more than any other, the famous Protocols of Zion, which purports to be notes taken at a meeting of Jews sometime during the nineteenth century, detailing a plan for world domination through intrigues, deception, and terror.

I have already published my criticism of the Protocols elsewhere, but suffice it to say here that, although the book is unlikely to be what it claims to be,  an actual record of an actual meeting, and though it clearly was created by a polemicist with a religious bias (witness its barbs directed at Darwin and Nietzsche, for example), its insights into the Jewish mentality and Jewish techniques are insightful and its tracing (before 1905!) of many of the paths that would be taken by the Jewish establishment in the last century are amazing.

Northcliffe probably saw the Protocols much as I see them, and decided they deserved to be seen and investigated by the British people.

Accordingly he saw to it that significant parts of them were published in the most prestigious newspaper in the country, The Times, of which he was the principal owner, under the title “The Jewish Peril, a Disturbing Pamphlet, Call for Enquiry.’

He did not declare the Protocols to be true, but rather called for a full investigation to discover whether or not they were true. He stated that “an impartial investigation of these would-be documents and of their history is most desirable. Are we to dismiss the whole matter without inquiry and to let the influence of such a book as this work unchecked?”

In 1922, Northcliffe asked the editor of The Times, Wickham Steed, to travel to Palestine to investigate the real nature of the Zionist project there, feeling sure that Steed, once he saw how a tiny and foreign Jewish minority was determined to use every foul means to dispossess the Palestinians, would make a 180-degree turn and stop supporting Chaim Weizmann and the other Zionists as he had theretofore.

In this Northcliffe miscalculated badly, for the Zionists’ hold on Steed (the exact nature of which deserves further investigation) was so strong that Steed openly refused to act upon any of the requests of the man who was the majority owner of the paper and who was therefore his employer!

Steed would not go to Palestine; Steed would not publish an article critical of Balfour’s attitude toward Zionism when asked to do so; and, when Northcliffe himself went to Palestine, Steed would not even publish Northcliffe’s own dispatches from that troubled land.

Who was protecting Steed? Who and what was motivating Steed? These questions became even more important later that year.

Douglas Reed wrote:

Then in 1922 Lord Northcliffe visited Palestine, accompanied by a journalist, Mr. J.M.N. Jeffries (whose subsequent book, Palestine: The Reality, remains the classic work of reference for that period). This was a combination of a different sort from that formed by the editors of The Times and Manchester Guardian, who wrote their leading articles about Palestine in England and in consultation with the Zionist chieftain, Dr. Weizmann.

Lord Northcliffe, on the spot, reached the same conclusion as all other impartial investigators, and wrote, “In my opinion we, without sufficient thought, guaranteed Palestine as a home for the Jews despite the fact that 700,000 Arab Moslems live there and own it. The Jews seemed to be under the impression that all England was devoted to the one cause of Zionism, enthusiastic for it, in fact; and I told them that this was not so and to be careful that they do not tire out our people by secret importation of arms to fight 700,000 Arabs.

There will be trouble in Palestine . . . people dare not tell the Jews the truth here. They have had some from me.”

The articles by Jeffries and Northcliffe didn’t get published in The Times, but they did see the light of day in Northcliffe’s other papers, greatly alarming the Zionists, who needed the acquiescence of the British people for their land-grab to succeed.

Things started happening very fast for Lord Northcliffe soon thereafter. On February 26th, 1922, he returned from Palestine. On March 2d, he strongly criticized Steed at an editorial conference, expecting to precipitate his resignation.

To Northcliffe’s amazement, Steed did not resign but decided to consult an attorney “to secure a lawyer’s opinion on the degree of provocation necessary to constitute unlawful dismissal.” Then, Steed says, he consulted Northcliffe’s own legal advisor who supposedly stated that Lord Northcliffe was “abnormal”, “incapable of business” and, judging from his appearance, “unlikely to live long” and who therefore advised the editor “to continue in his post.”

On March 31st, Steed went to see Northcliffe in France and upon returning started spreading the story — even telling a director of the paper — that Northcliffe was “going mad.”

Douglas Reed himself worked with Northcliffe a few weeks later and reports he saw nothing at all indicating illness, madness, or abnormality of any kind.

Reed also states that a very sane and sober Northcliffe informed him that someone was trying to kill him.

Reed tells us:

The suggestion of madness thus was put out by an editor whom Lord Northcliffe desired to remove and the impressions of others therefore are obviously relevant.

On May 3, 1922 Lord Northcliffe attended a farewell luncheon in London for a retiring editor of one of his papers and “was in fine form”. On May 11, 1922 he made “an excellent and effective speech” to the Empire Press Union and “most people who had thought him ‘abnormal’ believed they were mistaken”.

A few days later, Lord Northcliffe telegraphed instructions to the Managing Director of The Times to arrange for the editor’s resignation.

This Managing Director saw nothing “abnormal” in such an instruction and was not “in the least anxious about Northcliffe’s health”. Another director, who then saw him, “considered him to have quite as good a life risk as his own”: he “noticed nothing unusual in Northcliffe’s manner or appearance” (May 24, 1922).

On June 11th, Steed met Northcliffe again in France and Northcliffe bluntly told him that he, Northcliffe, would now assume editorship of The Times. The next day, Steed, Northcliffe, and the entire entourage were aboard a train bound for Evian-les-Bains. Unknown to Northcliffe, a doctor (whose name has not been revealed to this day) was secreted aboard the train by Steed, and somehow Northcliffe was manipulated into his custody.

When the train arrived in Switzerland, another unnamed physician (described years later only as “a brilliant French nerve specialist”) was summoned and declared Northcliffe “insane.”

Immediately Steed telegraphed the ‘news’ to London and ordered The Times to disregard and not to publish any communications from its primary owner.

On June 13th, Steed returned to London. On June 18th, Northcliffe was back in London, too, but in custody and totally removed from all control of or communication with his far-flung enterprises.

Even his telephone lines were cut. Police were posted at the offices of The Times to prevent his entering should he reach them. He never did.

On that same day, with Northcliffe out of circulation and his powerful voice of protest silenced, the League of Nations voted to reconfirm the ‘British Mandate’ in Palestine, which had mutated into a ‘mandate’ to install the Zionists in power there by violence and fraud. [ http://tinyurl.com/ytxyh ]

On August 14th, 1922 Lord Northcliffe died, supposedly the cause of death being “ulcerative endocarditis.” None of the story of his alleged insanity or confinement was known to the public at the time. It was concealed for thirty years, eventually coming out in the Official History of The Times and, in greater detail in Reed’s The Controversy of Zion.

When Northcliffe died, he left in his will three month’s salary to each of his 6,000 employees, a total of 533,000 pounds —  a huge sum in today’s inflated currency.

The story of Northcliffe’s challenge to the Zionists deserves more study, as does the continuation of that challenge by Northcliffe’s brother Harold, Lord Rothermere.

Rothermere eventually came to the conclusion that Jewish power needed to be defeated for the good of Europe, and that Britain’s best interest lay in support of the other European nations which had begun the fight.

Lord Rothermere wrote in the Daily Mail for the 10th of July, 1933:

I urge all British young men and women to study closely the progress of the Nazi regime in Germany. They must not be misled by the misrepresentations of its opponents. The most spiteful detractors of the Nazis are to be found in precisely the same sections of the British public and press as are most vehement in their praises of the Soviet regime in Russia.

They have started a clamorous campaign of denunciation against what they call “Nazi atrocities” which, as anyone who visits Germany quickly discovers for himself, consists merely of a few isolated acts of violence such as are inevitable among a nation half as big again as ours, but which have been generalized, multiplied and exaggerated to give the impression that Nazi rule is a bloodthirsty tyranny.

The German nation, moreover, was rapidly falling under the control of its alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty times as many Jewish Government officials in Germany as had existed before the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves into key positions in the German administrative machine. Three German Ministers only had direct relations with the Press, but in each case the official responsible for conveying news and interpreting policy to the public was a Jew.

[ http://tinyurl.com/ypbsf ]

Rothermere died, some say of a broken heart, shortly after the second great Jew-instigated fratricidal European bloodbath began in 1939.

The life and death of Lord Northcliffe have left us many lessons.

Chief among those lessons is this: The enemy with whom we deal has no honor and no concept whatsoever of a fair fight, whether in a shooting war or in the war of ideas.

Dealing with them as we would deal with an opponent of our own race, observing the conventions of civility and fairness and an “honorable contest” and expecting the same from them, will be fatal every time.

What we can expect from them is a stab in the back; poisoning; paid betrayers; lies, lies, and more lies in every direction one turns, lies so thick that they multiply faster than one can respond to them; and destruction of a million innocent lives if it gets them one inch closer to their inhuman goals.

— 31 October 2021 300 euros via PayPal from M in France

— 30 October 2021 $50 via PayPal from V in Denmark

Him in a previous life, also good at getting donations 

— 27 October 2021 $400 cash from fmr Marine Corps officer P in Florida, a donor and friend for twelve years

— 25 October 2021 600 euros from C in Germany

— 24 October 2021 300 euros from M in France

— 22 October 2021 $200 loan to keep the site going forgiven by P in Florida

— 20 October 2021 $200 via US Postal Service money order from K in Massachusetts plus the cost of $8.70 in priority-mail postage

— 18 October 2021 300 euros from M in France

— 10 October 2021 300 euros from M in France

— 6 October 2021 $50 cash from P in Florida

— 2 October 2021  300 euros from M in France

— 2 October 2021 $50 via PayPal from V in Denmark

— 1 October 2021 $200 loan from P in Florida

— 25 September 2021 300 Euros via Paypal from M in France

— 18 September 2021 300 Euros via Paypal from M in France

— 14 September 2021 $50 via Amazon gift card from T in Florida

— 11 September 2021 300 euros (same in US dollars) from M in France

— 9 September 2021 $300 via Amazon gift card from J in Nevada

— 5 September 2021 300 euros (same in US dollars) from M in France

— 31 August 2021 500 euros via PayPal from C in Germany

— 25 August 2021 300 euros via PayPal from L in the French part of Belgium, Wallonnie (whence Léon Degrelle)

— 22 August 2021 $41 dollars via PayPal from V in Odense, Denmark

— 20 August 2021 $200 in cash from local supporter

This is a new trend — locals supporting me.

As of yesterday, it was another slogan:

“AH was right.”

All I can say is the Afghan combat veterans here in Onto are shocked by the Afghan debacle.

— 19 August 2021 300 euros and card from M in France

— 14 August 2021 Australian $400 ( = US$ 300) from P in Australia and letter re mRNA Covid vaccines

It being a windy day, I placed paperweights on the contents. I always keep them near in case wind comes up. 

.

— 11 August 2021 300 Euros from M in Belgium