Nixon, like my father’s friend Reagan, knew all about racial differences and clammed up

President Nixon and his advisor, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, both agreed blacks had lower IQs but that federal policy must remain to deny all racial differences — lie — to avoid trouble.

My father knew Nixon well, also his National Security Advisor and then Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger (my father is seen on the right),

…and President Gerald Ford

…..and was a loyal Ronald Reagan ally.

I met Reagan this way in Quonset, Rhode Island in 1975.

My father’s house in Barrington, Rhode Island

Dad told me that RR and James Baker (his chief of staff from Texas,who later also said “Fuck the Jews!”) could not stand the blacks and there was no point in Republicans even pursuing the black vote.

Reagan was nearly shot shortly after his inauguration. (Margi heard the shots from her apartment window.) The Jews were very afraid that this resolute, charismatic, handsome Irish-American would go”off-reservation” — and really wanted the total puppet, pedophile and fmr CIA director George HW Bush, his Veep, instead. If John Hinckley’s bullet had landed just one inch to the left, Bush 41 would have been president in 1981. http://www.two-views.com/celebrity/ronald-reagan-chest-xray.html

 

But these men were not leaders — they were mere politicians, whose business is lying to the people and making empty promises, while serving Jewry  — and they said nothing.

Reagan also signed the Martin Luther King federal holiday (unwillingly) and sanctions on South Africa (also unwillingly), and “amnestied” (unwillingly, again) millions of illegal alien Mexicans while piously promising that, in return, he would crack down afterward on any new illegals……

Going back to Nixon and the blacks….. This info is taken from https://www.amren.com/commentary/2017/05/richard-nixon-race-iq-moynihan-herrnstein/

***

A fascinating recording of a 1971 conversation between President Richard Nixon and his advisor, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, was recently released (embedded below). It shows that both Nixon and Moynihan knew about group differences in IQ, and fully understood their policy implications. And yet, for reasons neither explains, they insist that differences of this kind must be kept a secret.

The 25-minute conversation begins with a discussion about an article called “IQ” that Richard Herrnstein had just published in The Atlantic and that Moynihan had sent to Nixon. This was a comprehensive, 18-page explanation of the heritability of intelligence, its correlation with success in life and ”most controversially ”the suggestion that the black/white gap in average IQ is due, at least in part, to genetic differences.

Nixon: Nobody on the staff even knows I read the goddamn article.

Moynihan: Oh, good.

Nixon: . . . The Herrnstein stuff and all the rest: First, nobody must know we are thinking about it, and second, if we do find out it’s correct we must never tell anybody.

Moynihan: I’m afraid that’s just the case. Yep, yep.

Nixon: . . .  I reluctantly concluded . . . that what Herrnstein says, and ”what’s that earlier, by [Arthur] Jensen? ”and so forth is probably very close to the truth.

Nixon clearly thinks Herrnstein and Jensen are right. He even describes how the facts could be made more palatable.

Nixon: Then you counter that by saying something the racists would never agree with, that within groups there are geniuses ”there are geniuses within black groups, [but] there are more within Asian groups. And, incidentally, it was a rather neat trick to point out that the Asians are number one, and Caucasians are number two, and the . . .

Moynihan: The Eskimos [Moynihan is clearly suggesting the word “Eskimos” as a euphemism for Jews].

Nixon: . . . the Eskimos are above the whites, which is good. And also your little deal about the English and the Irish [Moynihan was of Irish ancestry]. Now, that is the best example of the fact that this is knowledge, but it is knowledge that is better not to know. [Nixon is referring to evidence that the Irish have a lower average IQ than the English.] At least, good God, it would cause another war. They’re having enough damn problems in Northern Ireland now. And, basically, there are Irish geniuses.

Nixon then explains why it is important for him to know the truth about race and IQ.

Nixon: . . . You can pass this on to Herrnstein, but the reason I have to know it is that as I go for programs, I must know that they have basic weaknesses.

In other words, some programs will not work because different groups do not have the same abilities. It is important for the President to know this even if he does not talk about it openly. Nixon then talks of the danger of people becoming dependent on welfare and making it a way of life. He refers to Sweden, where he believes social programs have not made people lazy, but clearly thinks blacks are susceptible to welfare dependency.

Nixon: [In Sweden,] they still have a tremendous emphasis on the work ethic, that going on welfare is sort of ain’t the thing people ought to do. Now, that is, of course, why the work requirement thing [for receiving welfare in the United States] is so important here. Everybody says, “Well, the work requirement is only for the purpose of making these poor colored women, you know, who can’t work, and have little babies coming every month or ”sorry ”every nine months, I believe.” . . . The whole point is, as you well know, that we just not get into the sort of psychology that welfare is a good way of life.

Nixon then repeats the warning that social programs that ignore race will fail:

Nixon: On family assistance, on anything we do, we’ve got to recognize the limits of social policy. If we don’t, we’re going to raise these expectations and then have the dull thud. That was the problem with [Lyndon] Johnson. . . . He carried out a lot of things [the social assistance that became known as “Great Society” programs] . . . I think he convinced himself all this stuff was going to work.

Nixon then gets back to race:

Nixon: Of the 40 or 45 black countries that have representatives at the United Nations, not one has a president or a prime minister who is there as a result of a contested election, such as we were insisting on in Vietnam. . . . I’m not saying that blacks cannot govern. I am saying they have a hell of a time. Now, that must demonstrate something. Now, having said that, let’s look at Latin America. Latin America has had 150 years of trying at it, and they don’t have much going down there, either. . . .

As you compare the Latin dictatorships, etc., their forms of government, they at least do it their way. It is an orderly way, which works relatively well. They have been able to run the damn place. Looking at the black countries ”of course there are only two old ones. Haiti is an old one, and Liberia is a very old one. Ethiopia is a very old one. But they have a hell of a time running the place. . . .

It’s right beneath the surface, this whole black-white deal. It’s gonna come out: the fact that Asians are capable of governing themselves, one way or another, we Caucasians have learned it after having slaughtered each other in religious wars and other wars for many, many years including a couple in this last century. The Latins do it in a miserable way, but they do it. But the Africans just can’t run things.

Now, that’s a very, very fundamental point in the international scene. . . .

Nixon then talks about African diplomats.

Nixon: I receive their ambassadors; they change all the time. I love them, they’re so kind and so nice, and they’re children. Children.

Moynihan: And they always want something, like children.

More:

Richard Nixon, Race Realist

…..Amazing comment