The coming State of the Union Speech

Dr. A. H. Krieg 01/23/10

[JdN: Dr. Adrian H. Krieg has written numerous engineering books as well as over 100 technical articles. He is a columnist and a contributing writer in numerous magazines and newspapers in America and Europe. Dr. Krieg is currently a resident of Florida who was born in St. Gallen, Switzerland, in 1938. Dr. Krieg is a dual national who has also lived in Italy, Germany and Mexico. I am enjoying his powerful VALE book, which is good reading for not-yet WNs:

Dr. Krieg’s website

http://a2zpublications.com

* * *

In a few days Obama will provide the Congress and nation with his fairy-tale concept of what has transpired in the past twelve months. The wooden puppet whose nose growth has no limits, which looks like a marionette manipulated by its Ponzigoniff masters, is sure to entertain us.

After all, the very effort of converting a total failure into a success through teleprompter speeches scripted by his Marxist puppet masters, is sure to fascinate us all.

Before I continue, let us all review the presidential oath that was mouthed but been shattered, at the second attempt, by The One:

I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will do the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States” (Constitution Article II Section I)

One supposes that the operative phrase allowing Pinocchio an “out” is this:

…..“to the best of my ability.”;-)

Our Christian founders did not even consider that such words would be used to circumvent intent.

In consideration of his affiliation with such stalwart constitutionalists as Frank Marshall Davis, his [JdN: black nationalist porn-writing communist] boyhood mentor and bisexual communist, and (footnote 1) William Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn, both communists and members of the Weathermen Underground (footnote 2), Jeremiah Wright, his 20-year minister of hate that baptized his daughters, and friends like Rashid Khalidi, Khalid al-Mansour, Michael Pfleger, and Richard Daley, one should not be surprised by anything in the upcoming speech.

I have no crystal ball but, based on past performances, I pretty well can anticipate some of what we will hear from the teleprompter.;-)

The following phrases will be repeated ad infinitum:

—“Back from the abyss”

–“Make no mistake” [JdN: we already made one in 2008!]

–“Let me be perfectly clear”

–“The problems I inherited”

–“We have reached bottom, and are on the way to recovery”

–“The worst is over”

–“We are overcoming the problems of the past eight years”

In modern terminology this stuff is called spin. We used to call it BS….

The bulk of the address will be centered on blaming anyone and everyone – because narcissistic egomaniacs are unable to accept responsibility. You will not hear the words:

–“I made a mistake”

–“I shall rectify our errors”

–“I misjudged” or

–“I chose the wrong advisors.”

It takes a big man to acknowledge his mistakes, and Obama is not a big man. [JdN: just tall and skinny] The entire White House staff consists of leftist psychopathic ideologues who shamelessly push their dogmatic socialist agenda, to which Obama adheres.

Before we continue, I am sick and tired of the entire media campaign to portray this president as brilliant, intelligent, the smartest president we have ever had, and so forth.

The man is a fool, and he is even unable to make a speech or respond to a question without pre-written text from his handlers.

My and Einstein’s elucidation of a fool is someone who repeats the exact same mistake over and over again and expects a different result. This is the curse of an ideologue.

People that are intelligent like Reagan, Kennedy, Clinton and Truman, all thought out divergent opinions, spoke to the opposition, and had open minds. They did not preside over an administration that locked all who had new, different, or varying ideas out in the cold. They did not try to govern through the use of only one faction (footnote 3) of their own party.

Obama ran for office on the promise of change, and he provided change. The only problem is that he never, during the campaign, said what the change was to be, and then tried and failed to institute change that no one wanted. He said; “I will fundamentally change our country,” and thank God he’s failed. Change, as we learn from Eric Hoffer, is a primary tool of political manipulation. Obama read Hoffer diligently and it is Hoffer’s book The True Believer that has been the guiding light of Obama’s campaign not the writings of some communist fools as has been sited. Hoffer’s book is not one of political ideology but one of mass movements, how they are created, and how they are led and manipulated. Perhaps he also studied some of Dr. Goebbels writings.

* * *

“THE TRUE BELIEVER”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_True_Believer

[JdN: Hoffer bashed all idealism except for the Rockefeller-Rothschild NWO, implying we should believe in nothing but THEIR materialism, atheism, consumer buying, serial sex and pseudo-choice democracy. But his book is very accurate — in an evil, cynical way — about losers and psychopaths joining movements and becoming irritating fanatics.]

* * *

Thesis and background

The book evaluates and sometimes disparages communists, fascists, nationalists, and early Christians. Part of Hoffer’s thesis is that movements are interchangeable and that fanatics will often flip from one movement to another. Furthermore, Hoffer argues the motivations for mass movements are interchangeable: religious, nationalist and class-based movements tend to behave in the same way and use the same tactics, even when their stated goals or values are diametrically opposed.

There have been 23 editions of The True Believer published between 1951 and 2002.

Summary

Hoffer argues that mass movements such as fascism and communism spread by promising a glorious future. To be successful, these mass movements need the adherents to be willing to sacrifice themselves and others for the future goals. To do so, mass movements need to devalue both the past and the present. Mass movements appeal to frustrated people who are dissatisfied with their current state, but are capable of a strong belief in the future. As well, mass movements appeal to people who want to escape a flawed self by creating an imaginary self and joining a collective whole. Some categories of people who may be attracted to mass movements include poor people, misfits, and people who feel thwarted in their endeavors. Hoffer quotes extensively from leaders of the Nazi and communist parties in the early part of the 20th Century, to demonstrate, among other things, that they were competing for adherents from the same pool of people predisposed to support mass movements. Despite the two parties’ fierce antagonism, they were more likely to gain recruits from their opposing party than from moderates with no affiliation to either.

The book also explores the behavior of mass movements once they become established (or leave the “active phase”). With their collapse of a communal framework people can no longer defeat the feelings of insecurity and uncertainty by belonging to a compact whole. If the isolated individual lacks vast opportunities for personal advancement, development of talents, and action (such as those found on a frontier), he will seek substitutes. These substitutes would be pride instead of self-confidence, memberships in a collective whole like a mass movement, absolute certainty instead of understanding.

=================

Instead of truth we are sure to get more hope, the second hit-word of the Obamamats. The problem with hope, however, is identical to “change”:

It is open to individual interpretation, and thus means a different thing to every listener. Hope and change are illusions of the verbal magician; the siren for the beast of big-goivernment socialism that will transform those who listen long enough to this song. This has resulted in a fundamental bi-polar conflict within our society, not seen since the War Between the States and its dire outcome.

The fact that Obama is an arrogant, egotistical narcissist with little intelligence but the ability to recite, with the aid of a teleprompter, what ever his puppet masters demand, should by almost one full year into his administration be clear to everyone. And anyone that in any manner disagrees with these progressive ideologues is simply locked out of the deliberations. Decisions are arrived at through unilateral consultation between agreeing “progressives” [JdN: once called “liberals” or “leftists”].

Others need not even speak, as The One stated publicly: “Get out of the way; I’m going to fix this.”

Perhaps it would have been a good idea if he at least tried to fix the problem with new people — who were not the instruments that created the fiasco in the first place. What a marvelous management style! If anyone ran a corporation in this manner it would be bankrupt in a month.

America, however, has the ability to just keep printing more money, and the fact that this fiat species is totally worthless does not bother “The One” [JdN: reference to the movie “The Matrix”] even an iota. After all, who cares about inflation when they are paid over $ 400,000 a year with guaranteed COLA [cost-of-living-adjustment for inflation], which payments continue on into infinity. Every time this man opens his mouth without one of his pre-written diatribes, he makes gaffes of monumental portions. It is so bad that his speech in Massachusetts on behalf of the losing candidate was a national embarrassment, demonstrating once again just how out of touch Disneyland-on-the-Potomac bureaucrats and politicians are.

• • 1. Gay American, Chicago Whip, Joined Communist Party in 1931, NNC member a communist front group.
    2. An affiliate group of SDS who bombed Chicago among other places.
    3. Progressive socialists.

Read Dr. Krieg’s new book, coming in March 2010: Oz in the 21^st Century.

Dr. David Kelly was found dead in the woods near his Oxfordshire home.

The official heading an inquiry into the suspicious death of a British weapons inspector who cast doubts on the main argument for invading Iraq has secretly ordered all evidence locked up for 70 years.

Lord Hutton, who chaired the 2003 inquiry, which controversially concluded that Doctor David Kelly’s death has been a suicide, secured a 70-year seal on all major evidence, including medical records — none of which had ever been made public.

The unprecedented move was revealed last week, sparking fresh uproar and allegations of a government cover-up — considering that by 2073 anyone with the least interest, or stake, in the case will probably be long dead.

Kelly was mysteriously found dead in the woods near his Oxfordshire home in July 2003, just days after his name was leaked as the source of a pre-war BBC documentary that undermined the now-notorious 45-minute dossier as highly exaggerated.

The clandestine restrictions came to light when a group of 13 doctors challenging the Hutton verdict received a letter from the Oxfordshire County Council in answer to their calls to see the postmortem file.

“It fits in with the subversion of due process we have seen for six years. It is extraordinary…I am shocked but not surprised by this,” the Daily Mail quoted Dr. David Halpin, one of the group of 13 doctors, as saying on Saturday.

The revelations may prompt calls on the country’s ongoing inquiry into the Iraq war, to question former British premier Tony Blair, who is to give evidence later this week, on the issue.

Blair penned a clinching introduction to the dossier, claiming spies had proved “beyond doubt” that the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction that he could launch within 45-minutes.

From this lovely juish city, the veritable “Matrix,” the destruction of the proud and rising German Reich — a land of 1200 years of art and beauty — was diabolically planned and executed. Here the Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (forget the “Anti-“) has its headquarters — right across from the UN Building. And these juze tell us they are in favor of “the individual”! Yes, the individual COG on their machine.

Below, The Grand Hall of the Reich, planned for Berlin by Adolf Hitler and designed by architect Albert Speer. Germany stood for beauty, nobility, character and social justice. That is why its idealistic, brave and supremely skilled soldiers could resist a whole attacking world’s onslaught for six years, 1939-45. (Yes, it was France and Britain who declared war on Germany…. and yes, Stalin was planning a massive attack westward upon Germany just weeks after Hitler beat him to the punch.  See the truth by a Russian Jew, defending Hitler’s decision, in his book Icebreaker: http://www.amazon.com/Icebreaker-Who-Started-Second-World/dp/0241126223]

Yet the gigantic Junited Snakes with astounding Pentagon budgets cannot manage to defeat truly small nations such as North Korea, or North Vietnam, or Iraq, or Afghanistan!

Had Hitler been permitted to win the war, there would be no communism, no Al Qaida, and no juish control of the world’s media and economy. The juze would be on the island of Madagascar off the southeastern coast of Africa: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan

================MY LETTER TO PROFESSOR ROBERT FAURISSON

Mark Weber ruined even MORE the once-vibrant IHR, the Willis-Carto-founded Institute for Historical Review (which was telling the truth about the white guilt trip of juish Holocaust stories), by writing in January 2009 that the Holocaust happened — and thus he was going to focus on ju-fighting in more effective ways….. Recently, a major ju enemy was gloating about this declaration, deriving aid and comfort from Weber’s words (http://www.thejudeosphere.com/?p=742)

Weber had cited a supposed quote from the supposed “Joseph Goebbels diaries” where the propaganda minister supposedly writes privately to himself that the juze were getting gotten rid of discreetly east of occupied Poland.

The supposed quotation from the supposed “Goebbels Diaries”:

“The Jews are now being pushed out of the General Government, beginning near Lublin, to the East. A pretty barbaric procedure is being applied here, and it is not to be described in any more detail, and not much is left of the Jews themselves. In general one may conclude that 60% of them must be liquidated, while only 40% can be put to work. The former Gauleiter of Vienna [Globocnik], who is carrying out this action, is doing it pretty prudently and with a procedure that doesn’t work too conspicuously. The Jews are being punished barbarically, to be sure, but they have fully deserved it. The prophesy that the Fuhrer issued to them on the way, for the eventuality that they started a new world war, is beginning to realise itself in the most terrible manner. [JdN: This refers to Hitler’s famous speech of March 1939, discussed below by me.] One must not allow any sentimentalities to rule in these matters. If we did not defend ourselves against them, the Jews would annihilate us. It is a struggle for life and death between the Aryan race and the Jewish bacillus. No other government and no other regime could muster the strength for a general solution of the question. Here too the Führer is the persistent pioneer and spokesman of a radical solution, which is demanded by the way things are and thus appears to be unavoidable. Thank God during the war we have a whole lot of possibilities which were barred to us in peacetime. We must exploit them. The ghettos which are becoming available in the General Government are now being filled with the Jews who are being pushed out of the Reich, and after a certain time the process is then to renew itself here. Jewry has nothing to laugh about …”.

Taking this one quote from this one page of this one “document” as gospel truth, Weber basically betrays all the work of dozens of scientists, engineers, historians and professors who have gone to PRISON FOR YEARS — and declares that because of one supposed passage — churned out by a “Holocaust Industry” (Norman Finkelstein’s phrase) proven to be brimming with falsified documents, exaggerations and lying and contradictory eyewitnesses (as also proved by Finkelstein) — he was abandoning the very reason why the IHR was created in the first place: to tell the truth about the Holocaust fraud.

Weber now accepts the juish Holocaust fraud he is paid to fight.

I wrote the letter (email) below to Dr. Robert Faurisson, the dean of Holocaust revisionism, living over in Vichy, France, to discuss the “Goebbels diary” passage that is Weber’s excuse to abandon his assigned mission.

I also wanted to discuss wit him Hitler’s famous threat before the Reichstag (German Parliament) of March 1930, which was that if the juze started yet another world war, it would end in the “Ausrottung der jüdischen Rasse in Europa,” the uprooting of the juish race in Europe.”

Here is my email to him.

* * *

Dear Professor Faurisson,

Re: “Goebbels Diary”

Someone opined that Goebbels could have indeed written that diary passage which Weber quotes, but that Goebbels could simply have been misinformed.

I think the reasoning is weak. Goebbels would have been privy to a mass extermination of millions of Jews happening just 500 km from Berlin, in German-ruled territory.

And he would have expected, as the Propaganda Minister, to deal with any PR fallout from the inevitable leaks. IMO [in my opinion], he would have known accurately about millions of Jews being eradicated.

And he had been very close to Hitler for 15 years! He was a high-ranking cabinet minister and he was also gauleiter of Berlin, the capital of Gemany!

We know that Auschwitz inmates were sending letters to loved ones and getting packages, and even lending money to SS guards. They would certainly have mentioned in their letters being about to go to a gas chamber!

None of this makes “Goebbels” passage makes any sense. There is still NO explanation of how technically these millions of deaths happened. And it would take a vast government program to kill millions and dispose completely of their corpses.

I continue to assume that at least this one key “guilt-inducing” page of the “Goebbels Diary” is falsified.

And I maintain that Hitler, even in his March 1939 speech to which the “Goebbels” passage refers, threatening the Ausrottung der jüdischen Rasse in Europa, was simply bluffing. First, “Ausrottung” means uprooting, which is very clear in the Brothers Grimm’s famous German dictionary of 1862, available online — they were scientific linguists who wrote their famous children’s fairy tales only as a sideline. The Grimms list numerous cases of this in the German Bible by Martin Luther, where especially things are removed, pulled out like weeds, not exterminated.

Further, as we know, English and German are related Germanic languages with many similar words, although English has borrowed a great deal of French since the Norman Conquest. In the word Ausrottung, “Aus” means “out” and “rottung” means “rooting.” Thus Ausrottung is a “rooting-out” — regardles of what any post-WWII ju-owned dictionaries NOW say so as to put a sinister spin on Hitler’s words.

http://germazope.uni-trier.de/Projects/WBB/woerterbuecher/dwb/wbgui?lemmode=lemmasearch&mode=hierarchy&textsize=600&onlist=&word=ausrotten&lemid=GA08739&query_start=1&totalhits=0&textword=&locpattern=&textpattern=&lemmapattern=&verspattern=#GA08739L0

AUSROTTEN, exstirpare [Latin], ausreuten, nnl. uitroden: [JdN: Now follow many Old Testament examples] sondern ire altar soltu umbstürzen und ire götzen zubrechen, und ire haine ausrotten. 2 Mos. 34, 13; er rottet die haine aus. 2 kön. 18, 4; laszt uns den bawm aus dem lande der lebendigen ausrotten. Jer. 11, 19; ja man wird seine wurzel ausrotten und seine früchte abreiszen. [JdN: Jeremiah 11:19 in the King James version: “Let us destroy the tree with the fruit thereof, and let us cut him off from the land of the living, that his name may be no more remembered.”] Ez. 17, 9; und ob sie eine zeitlang an den zweigen grünen, weil sie gar lose stehen, werden sie vom winde bewegt und vom starken winde ausgerottet. weish. Sal. 4, 4; kann man ohn schaden ein baum nicht ausrotten, so soll man ihn beschneiden und stümmeln. bildlich sehr oft in der bibel, z. b. des seele soll ausgerottet werden aus seinem volk. 1 Mos. 17, 14; denn welche diese grewel thun, dere seelen sollen ausgerottet werden von irem volk. 3 Mos. 18, 29. 19, 8; und wil ewre höhen vertilgen und ewre bilder ausrotten. 26, 30; und unsern namen ausrotten von der erden. Jos. 7, 9; alle völker die ich ausgerottet habe. 23, 4; bis er ausrottet alles was mansbilde war in Edom. 1 kön. 11, 16; der die alte catholische lehre wollte helfen ausrotten. SCHWEINICHEN 1, 173. 212; unser ausgerottetes geschlecht. LESSING 1, 163; das laster, die neugier ausrotten. GOTTER 2, 11. 1, 56; der despot geht endlich so weit, dasz er alle seine verwandten ausrotten will. GÖTHE 33, 58;

diese brut ist ausgerottet. [This brood is outrooted/destroyed.]
PLATEN 277.

It is accurate also to admit that the word can shade into something more lethal. After all, when you uproot a weed, you probably not intend to lovingly replant it anywhere else! 😉

Furthermore, if a man commits just one single murder, he can be killed himself by an angry society — and we call that hanging, shooting, gassing or electrocution by the legal name of “execution.”

If the juish people start a world war where 20 million white people die, that is not a single murder; that is MASS-murder. What is the penalty for MASS-murder?

If Hitler was warning the juze not to instigate yet another world war, then with which appropriate punishment would he  threaten?

(We know that at the kangaroo, bogus “Nuremberg War Crimes Trials” of 1946, eleven INNOCENT German leaders were hanged — wrongfully — for starting World War Two. (As I have written, John Kennedy in his bestselling Profiles In Courage, denounced these trials: scroll down 1/4 here — https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/01/06/solutrea-to-prevent-more-von-brunn-tragedies) In any case, this proves that the general view is that any group that deliberately starts a world war is criminal and a gang of mass-murderers — who should be executed.)

So I will state this:

The German word “Ausrottung” can mean “rooting out” or it can mean extermination. It can mean “getting rid of a people, dangerous animals or ruinous insects. “Getting rid of” might mean extermination – and those who kill termites in our house, for example, are called “exterminators.”  We do not “find new homes’ for termites!

But Ausrottung might mean uprooting and shipping elsewhere — such as to Madagascar or to the Far Asian part of Russia. (As the brave and beautiful Lady Michelle Renouf has tirelessly pointed out — http://www.birobidjan.co.uk — and my translation of this huge monograph [https://johndenugent.com/russia_and_jews.pdf] confirms this as well, the Soviets set up a juish homeland — THAT STILL EXISTS ! –in Birobidjan in Siberia near the Chinese border!)

But let us say that Hitler WAS threatening the juze — with this ambiguous word, and between the lines, with real extermination…..(and many blacks, muslims, and whties have now directly told me that they now wish he HAD executed at least all the worst of their leaders.…)

Did Hitler ever bluff?

Yes, as in his boast in an September 4, 1940 speech that English planes did not dare fly over Germany during the day (here in this video of an actual Hitler speech and radio broadcast, augmented with a fictitious CGI film of the event — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bmyn2bQx_qI and listen to the section 0:30-43) and his threat to “eradicate their cities” [the cities of a Britain which under Churchill already had been pounding German CIVILIAN areas deliberately with explosive and incendiary bombs — in a planned and constant war crime against civilians — for three solid months! — even neglecting military targets!!]. At 2:20-22, you hear the second empty threat.

Heisser gekocht wie gegessen, as the Germans say — “It was cooked hotter than it was eaten,” “C’est plus chaudement cuit que mangé”. Hitler was a practical politician, for all his sincere and genuine ideals, who bluffed and made threats — hoping it would not come down to that. All living things have to bluff sometimes.

I think his threat of March 1939 was an attempt to deter the Jews from instigating a war, but was like many other political vows, it was spoken but it was not kept.

After all, Hitler was NOT Stalin who could easily kill millions. This is the “sentimental” man to whom Mussolini referred in his letter to his mistress Clara Petacci (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/11/17/adolf-hitler-was-so-sentimental-according-to-benito-mussolini-115875-21828065), and the man who let 100,000 Englishmen escape at Dunkirk, and had 90,000 part-Jewish soldiers in his Wehrmacht, even generals, and a part-Jewish bodyguard!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4QcgKUamBA&feature=related

* * *

* * *

Emil Maurice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Emil Maurice (January 19, 1897, Westermoor – February 6, 1972, Munich ) was an early member of the Nazi Party. A watchmaker, he was a close associate of Adolf Hitler with a personal friendship dating back to at least 1919. With the founding of the Sturmabteilung in 1920, Maurice became the first Oberster SA-Führer (Supreme SA Leader).

In 1923, Maurice also became the SA commander of the newly established Stabswache, a special SA company given the task of guarding Hitler at Nazi parties and rallies.

In 1925, two years after the failed Beer Hall Putsch, Maurice and Hitler refounded the Stabswache as the Stosstrupp Adolf Hitler which was renamed, later that year, as the Schutzstaffel (SS). At that time, Hitler became SS Member nr. 1 and Emil Maurice became SS Member nr. 2. Maurice became an SS-Führer in the new organization, although the leadership of the SS was assumed by Julius Schreck, the first Reichsführer-SS.

He reportedly had a brief relationship with Geli Raubal, Hitler’s niece.

When the SS was reorganized and began to expand in 1932, Maurice became a senior SS officer and would eventually be promoted to the rank SS-Oberführer. While Maurice never became a top commander of the SS his status as SS Member #2 effectively credited him as the actual founder of the organization. Heinrich Himmler, who ultimately would become the most recognized leader of the SS, held SS Member #168.

Maurice’s stagnant SS career, after Himmler had become Reichsführer-SS, has led historians to uncover evidence that Himmler suspected Maurice as being part Jewish. Himmler had lobbied for Maurice to be removed from the SS, although Hitler never approved this due to Maurice’s early membership in the organization.

The softie Hitler admired the Nordic blood in the English (left: Prince William) and let one hundred thousand British soldiers escape at Dunkirk in June 1940, amazing his generals with fond remarks about the British Empire. He wanted Britannia to rule the waves for the white race and Germany to rule the land.

Most unforgivably, he adopted that stupid mustache (his WWI one was all right) because it was English!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105×10369#10371

Yes, Hitler was a softie. I contacted him recently in a séance and asked him if he would come back and help us out. 😉 While the gypsy patiently waited, dusting her crystal ball, Hitler thought, and finally erupted:

Okäy, I vill help you! Baht, ziss time, NO MORE MR NICE GUY.

Hitler (left) in British Edwardian jacket and British/Charlie Chaplin mustache; Hitler (below), looking very grim after years at the front fighting the English and Scots (and French) in WWI. A double Iron Cross winner himself, severely wounded and gassed, he always chivalrously admired any brave enemy on the other side.

Finally, please see this video where my fiancée, Margaret Huffstickler, discusses a POEM — “In the Thicket of the Forest of Artois” — that will surprise anyone who hates Adolf Hitler, the genuine softie…..

http://www.youtube.com/johndenugent#p/u/11/aFOy6LtZbyI

(time 1:20-4:50)

“He’s your enemy!”

“He’s a man who is suffering!”

“These sacred hours, when human found himself in human….”

Friends, Margi and I need financial resources to finish my book, print my door-to-door materials, to train witnessing teams, and to get $2000 worth of DVD reproduction machines transported here from North Dakota, because my key book IS A DVD (text, photos, music, videos, and I also talk directly on the video in a heart-to-heart fireside chat to the reader).

You can send a money order, cash, a check to John de Nugent, or use PayPal (to john@democratic-republicans.us).

John de Nugent

213 Ekastown Road
Sarver PA 16055

* * *

A comrade responded:

* * *

Good reasoning.  It bothers me that Mark Weber would, presumably, accept these few lines [of the supposed “Goebbels Diary”] as not only authentic, but trumping the overwhelming amount of evidence, or lack thereof, to the contrary.

=========COMRADE SAYS I AM GIVING AWAY MY PLANS

A lady comrade retorted that the juze are such psychopaths that they do not respond even to imminent danger sighs and never have, because they [certainly their leaders] are full-bore psychopaths.

I wrote them both:

* * *

I agree with our white sister.

The juze are classic psychopaths and very predictable. Their main lust is sadism, and the fact that sadism produces outrage and their own downfall is something they have regularly blocked out for 3,000 years now in a row! They just want, need to, and MUST inflict pain on their victims and avoid pain for themselves, and they are thus right out of the psychiatric manual.

My view, and that of Dr. David Duke and publisher Willis Carto as well, is that they are in fact part-neanderthal. They do not think as we do.

Carto has his own article about juze being neanderthals coming out in The Barnes Review.

David Duke once sent me an emaqil attachment of a CGI video clip, just ten seconds in duration, of how neanderthals walked, based on their skeletal structure, and kept exclaiming:

“Don’t you see! That is just how juze shuffle!’

And that is why I am now spelling them ju and juze (plural), to demythologize them, and show that as three millennia have proved, they [certainly their leaders] are not exactly 100% normal humans in their emotionality or in thier psychology — as proven by 3,000 years of heartless misdeeds of carefully planned evil to harm the societies that had welcomed them in.

And so they must act sadistically and imprudently because that is their nature. And they always trigger the outrage and then the explosion. Sadists always lose the popularity contest in the end. 😉

And they’ll never win the beauty contest. Just the evil contest, with flying colors.

Black double murderer OJ Simpson and (l-to-r), his black lawyer Johnny Cochran, his two juish attorneys, Alan Dershowitz and Robert Shapiro, and his armenian lawyer, Robert Kardashian. (According to part-juish author Michael Bradley, juze, Georgians and Armenians all descend from psychopathic neanderthals.)

One of Simpson’s victims, struggling actor and waiter Ron Goldman, was also juish, as were LA detective Mark Fuhrman, and the district attorney, Marcia Rachel Clark (b. NYC), who failed to get Simpson convicted. She later was paid $4.2 million for her book on the trial, which she lost despite massive blood evidence of the victims on OJ’s clothing, and a movie (never shown in cinemas) shot just before the killings where he had played a hitman who slashed his victims skilfully with a knife.