I received the English translation below of a German article on the legal persecution of a German comrade, Kevin Käther, for disproving the Jewish Holocaust lie. (That is, the lie that there was a Holocaust AGAINST jews; there certainly was a 40-million-victim Holocaust of innocent white Slavs in Russia and Ukraine, and it was committed BY jews during the Soviet Union’s bolshevik and stalinist periods from 1917-1957. Eight of the eleven gulag camps were run, Alexander Solzhenitysn wrote in his 2002 work Two Hundred Years Together, by murderous and psychopathic jews. And when I brought this up to the famous Jewish talkshow host Alan Colmes, he did everything possible to avoid that topic: see transcript here of Colmes show https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/01/06/solutrea-to-prevent-more-von-brunn-tragedies/)
James Damon in Texas had sent me his translation of the article below. Below that article you can read my very strong disagreement with the article”s donw-at-the-mouth conclusion. I am certain that the outcome of this case is one that should make us very OPTIMISTIC. Please be sure to read all that I have to say.
* * *
Kevin Käther Re-sentenced to 20 Months
The Latest Judicial News from Absurdistan
By the authors of the National Journal
Translated by J M Damon
The original is posted at globalfire.tv/nj/10de/verfolgungen/kevin_kaether.htm
****************
Like a true patriot, Kevin Käther has been fighting the modern Inquisition tribunals on behalf of the German nation.
In an appeal hearing on 9th June 2009, Tiergarten District Court (Berlin) initially sentenced him to a prison sentence of eight months without probation.
The concerned citizen will ask: What brought about his guilty verdict and prison sentence?
Kevin’s crime consisted of sending compact discs (CDs) of Germar Rudolf’s proscribed book Lectures On the Holocaust to three judges in Berlin and then filing an official complaint against himself for violating Germany’s notorious censorship laws.
His purpose in doing this was to judicially determine, in a court trial, whether Rudolf’s factual conclusions are scientifically valid.
In the cover letter that he sent with the CDs, he stated that if empirical evidence proved the contents of Rudolf’s book to be inaccurate, he would accept his punishment without objection or appeal.
He wrote:
“Under the censorship laws of the Federal Republic, distribution and dissemination of this book is proscribed as ‘Denial of Holocaust.’ Germar Rudolf, the author of this book, was sentenced to a prison term for the commendable but criminal act of writing it. As a self-respecting German I have a patriotic obligation to publicize these lectures in our country… I realize that I will probably be indicted and convicted in a court of law for my action, and I accept that probability.
In the ensuing criminal trial, you will be required to testify as witnesses.
For this reason, you should familiarize yourselves with the factual contents of Rudolf’s book, applying old-fashioned German thoroughness.”
The indictment came immediately. In order to either prove or disprove the veracity of Rudolf’s book in a judicial framework, Kevin submitted over four thousand pages of empirical evidence during his trial, along with Rudolf’s Expert Report on the Alleged Gas Chambers of Auschwitz.
[Rudolf, a diploma chemist at the Max Planck Institute, had originally prepared this expert report for the Defense in the 1992 trial of retired general Otto Ernst Remer for “Denying the Holocaust.”]
In 1993 Gen. Remer sent the Rudolf Report to more than 300 professors of Inorganic Chemistry.
Not a single professor found a single mistake in his numerous analyses, and an expert witness in a Swiss court also attested to its accuracy.
Regarding this report, the director of the Jewish Anne-Frank Association in Amsterdam, Hans Westra, made the following statement in 1994 on the Belgian TV program “Panorama”:
“The scientific analysis in this expert report is perfect.”
The Rudolf Expert Report was Kevin’s main piece of evidence, but he pointed out a number of other discrepancies in the official “Holocaust” tale that need clarification as well.
For example, the [prestigious Hamburg, Germany] newsweekly Die Zeit had reported that the “Auschwitz Holocaust” was carried out by mass shootings rather than homicidal gas chambers. [!!]
In addition, Kevin called on Gita Sereny, Britain’s foremost Jewish “Holocaust” researcher and writer, as a witness.
In the [London] Times issue of 29 August 2001 she agreed that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp. [JdN: And that is something when a newspaper, the Times — which as Goebbles pointed out is, spelled backward, “”semiT” ;-), admits that!]
Kevin also wanted the judges to indicate which of the official estimates of the number of Auschwitz deaths is correct, since they range from 66,000 to 9,000,000.
Kevin then asked the Court to clarify which of the judicially valid Maidanek verdicts is correct: the Berlin District Court determined that Maidanek Concentration Camp had no homicidal gas chambers, whereas Düsseldorf District Court ruled that mass gassings took place in homicidal gas chambers there.
He also asked the judges to clarify through evidentiary findings whether the victims in Treblinka Camp were killed with steam or gas.
The Allied Military Tribunal decreed that victims were “steamed” at Treblinka whereas Federal Republic verdicts claimed they were “gassed.” [JdN: This is because the lying jew witnesses were flagrantly contradicting each other.]
With over 4000 pages of evidentiary motions, Kevin hoped to make the Court establish whether he, on the strength of the documents he presented, had a legal right to publicly express the opinion that no homicidal gassings took place in Auschwitz and other wartime camps.
However, all of his evidentiary motions were disallowed, and he was threatened with additional criminal charges for attempting to introduce them!
This young German patriot, who had hoped to determine whether his historical opinions were correct or incorrect by introducing empirical evidence in a German court of law, had fallen into the black pit of judicial chaos.
The German courts refused to rule on whether official documents and their own rulings, which wildly contradict one another, support Kevin’s opinions.
Kevin then appealed his verdict to the Tiergarten Court [in Berlin]. In these proceedings, in which he submitted another 2500 pages of evidentiary motions, the original verdict of eight months imprisonment was upheld, as was the Court’s proscription against his submitting evidence.
Kevin then appealed on points of law to the next higher court.
Then, on 16 September 2009, a judicial sensation occurred: the Fourth Criminal Section (Kammergericht) of Berlin Superior Court of Justice vacated the verdict of the Tiergarten Appellate Court — and it did so in a way that allowed nothing but acquittal!
The Kammergericht ruled that Kevin’s sending the book CD to three judges did not involve the public, which was indispensable for the crime of “Holocaust Denial.”
Their decision [JdN: they are trying desperately to NOT rule on the whole subject of the Holofraud] reads as follows:
“The handing out of literature to one or a few specific individuals does not fulfill the requirement of distribution unless it is definitely established that these individuals intended to further distribute the literature.
The charge specified in the appealed verdict does not constitute such distribution.
“’Distribution’ is not involved here because we are dealing with only three CDs of the book that were intended for specific recipients and sent to them alone.
The ‘critical value’ of the minimum number of recipients needed to qualify as ‘distribution’ is clearly not present.”
Thus the Kammergericht ruling forced the hand of the Court of First Instance.
Because it was now clear that acquittal was certain to result from the first trial, Tiergargen District Court prepared a new indictment – this time on account of the evidence that Kevin attempted to submit.
The submission and consideration of evidence to prove the innocence of defendants is of course a universally recognized human right.
The European Convention of Human Rights specifically protects it.
In the “Holocaust” witch trials that are currently staged in the Federal Republic of Germany, however, this basic human right is routinely trodden underfoot.
It is undeniable that by refusing to accept evidentiary motions that would prove innocence in “Holocaust” trials, German courts routinely deny defendants the fundamental human right to a legal defense.
Actually the situation is even worse: our courts take the denial of human rights a step further than merely refusing to allow accused persons to defend themselves.
Not only are defendants forbidden to defend themselves: Even worse, they are charged with additional crimes for submitting evidentiary motions. Not even China engages in such judicial tyranny!
[JdN: This is very politically exploitable — that Germans are not allowed to prove their innocence. The only question, as Judge Meinerzhagen said in sentencing Ernst Zuendel (I attended part of his trial in Mannheim in 2006), is “you ‘denied’ the Holocaust — even if it did not happen. The law says you cannot deny it. It is not important whether it happened.”[!!!!!]]
On 10 December 2009 Kevin was sentenced to a prison sentence of one year and eight months for repeated “Incitement of the Masses” (Volksverhetzung, specifically, reading and submitting evidentiary motion in his first trial.)
This time, however, even though his “crime” was greater than in the first trial (distributing proscribed literature), the Court surprisingly substituted probation for prison time, even though the greater “crime” would logically call for greater punishment.
Did the judges suddenly develop a conscience or simply abandon all pretense of logical consistency?
Even with this new sentence, however, the Court still lacks any legal basis for sentencing Kevin.
This is because he had asked the Court to declare the session in which he read his evidentiary motions “not open to the public.”
Again no “public” existed, and with no public, there can be no distribution or “incitement”. [JdN: Very clever, Kevin!]
As the Kammergericht ruled, such a public is necessary for conviction under Section 130 of the Penal Code.
Thus this intrepid young father of a family, an honorable and patriotic German, has been effictively silenced.
With the probated sentence, the Court obviously intends to hold him politically hostage so that in future he will “keep his mouth shut.”
Kevin exhibited truly heroic patriotism, however.
He is a family man with a small daughter, and his conscience and sense of responsibility oblige him to refrain from further action under the present system. He has done enough, risked enough, struggled in exemplary fashion. Now he must devote himself to his family.
Our unjust and inconsistent system is certain to bring about its own downfall. This is the way it has always been.
****************
Here’s freedom to him who would speak,
Here’s freedom to him who would write;
For there’s none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!
ROBERT BURNS (1759–96)
=====================MY RESPONSE===========
Dear James,
Thanks for your work on this translation.
The excellent article itself ends on a pessimistic note, and I disagree entirely with it.
Once again, following a now clear pattern, the courts are going relatively easy on Holocaust dissidents — Irving released, Duke not indicted, Holappa not indicted, Reynouard not imprisoned, Theil not imprisoned, Varela not imprisoned, etc. I could also list the case of Sven B., living now in Washington DC and a friend of mine. (His site is www.nonkonformist.net) The Jew is “going easy” on him also, not even trying to collect a huge fine in Germany, though he has been openly passing through its airports.
Fearing martyrs…. they want us somehow to shut up yet without the image of prison bars….
The Jew feels fear.
One could object; What about the 12 years sentence for Horst Mahler, the three and a half years for Sylvia Stolz and the nine years total (US, CN, GE) for Ernst Zuendel, the two and a half years for Germar Rudolf, the six years for Froehlich and the six years for Honsik?
I am convinced Mahler WANTED the 12 years (a “life sentence” for a 70-year-old man) to blacken the image of Zionist Germanistan. Thus he greeted the most infamous Jew in Germany, Michel Friedman, in the presence of a Der Spiegel magazine reporter, at an arranged confrontation-discussion at Munich airport, with “Heil Hitler, Herr Friedman.”
Horst, whom I somewhat know personally as well as by reading his writings — I interviewed him for two hours alongside Sylvia Stolz, and we spoke three days before his first sentence — is an absolutist. He basically is a man without fear — for whom only eternal ideas and principles truly exist, the material world is an illusion used for testing our souls, and the Jew enemy’s power over us must be destroyed at all costs.
I agree with him, and I think Horst is a giant. Even among the other heroes he is a giant.
As for the Stolz, Rudolf, Froehlich, Honsik and Zuendel sentences, they go back, in my opinion, to the earlier Jewish phase, to the previous tactic of harsh sentences that is now seen as painfully BACKFIRING on the Jew.
The Jew knows especially that President Ahmadinejad of Iran will use these outrages to mock “Western” hypocrisy about “human rights.” and he knows that at any moment Chavez in Venezuela, Morales in Bolivia, and Ortega in Nicaragua as well as the entire Muslim world could go openly revisionist. Everyone now knows tha the Holocaut is yet another stinking jewish lie to extract money and guilt feelings from gentile victims.
As a former Marine with interrogator training, I have continued my interest for thirty years in the ways that the tone of voice, body language and facial expression reveal involuntarily the true opinions of the person being questioned.
For a split second (1/64th) everyone’s face, voice and body movements MUST reveal what we believe, before we cover it up and assume the “mask.”
For this reason, the new Israeli technique at airports is to flash symbols of SECRET terrorist organizations or faces on a wall as certain passengers walk through, then study carefully if their eyes widen for 1/64th of a second — in recognition of the secret symbol or face.
I tell you and all comrades that I am certain that the Jews are doing very in-depth polling, very high-tech polling, and they are determining two phenomena:
1) a gigantic new antisemitism and
2) an ominous fear and hatred of invasive non-whites.
And the foolish Jews (always given to overkill because of their contempt for the mental capacities of the goyeem) by building up Adolf Hitler in a thousand films, TV programs and magazines as the greatest, most irreconcilable Jew-killer ever, will ironically because of these two white fears rehabilitate him totally.
For thirty-one years I have heard people (whites but also American blacks) mutter, from somewhere deep inside them, in moments when they let the facade fall: “It’s going to take another Hitler to clean up this mess.”
People say: “I never heard anyone say this.” Well, I know how to talk to people and how to get them to open up. That is what an interrogator does, especially when playing the “nice” interrogator, the “good” cop in a two-man team alternating with a “mean” cop.
You establish a bond, establish trust, establish you are their friend, and that you respect their integrity as a decent person, and then they open up. They are tired of keeping the secret; they want to release and confess.
In my view, the proper interpretation to place on the fact that Kevin Käther got a 20-month SUSPENDED sentence is that the Jew feels deep fear of us again.
Now it will take a MOVEMENT to exploit it.
John de Nugent
=============BEING A SPARTAN
A friend just got in the mail a wonderful watercolor by a true Spartan, Ernst Zündel, now in his SEVENTH year of jail and prison.
I have tremendous admiration for Ernst Zündel, who has never backed down one inch in his convictions and his open proclamation of racial and Holocaust truth.
I met him briefly in 1987, in Toronto, and was very impressed. I saw him later in the courtroom in Mannheim in 2006, still a Spartan.
I also admire Robert Matthews for going out in a blaze of glory. THAT way out would have spared the Order comrades all the 10- to 40-year sentences. Leonidas and the Spartans — THAT was the purest of glories. Since 40 of the 50 Order members testified against each other, it is time to say they were very heroic guys but flawed and mortal sinners as we all are, extremely well-intentioned, and then move on — to the Eternal Solutreans.
Henrik Holappa was telling me how horrible it was when Stalin FORCED the Finns to turn their guns on their German weapon-brothers in late 1944-early 1945, in the “Brothers War,” or be occupied by the Soviet army and mass-murdered in Siberia.
There are some things that just soil our souls very seriously, and it is better to die fighting the jew than ever to do these soul-compromising misdeeds, like turning on our brothers as the satanic jew grins.
I live to smack that smirk off their hooked-nose faces.
The whole point of being a Solutrean, and I told the Brit reporter Steeds this too with respect to my religious ideas, was that we are souls in human bodies and all that we do, say, think and even attempt, is duly noted On High — and will impact in very concrete ways the future of our eternal souls. Our goal must be to be more than just “white”; we are Aryans, in Sanskrit, the noble ones.
* * *
Jake, the rancher, went one day
To fix a distant fence.
The wind was cold and gusty
And the clouds rolled gray and dense.
As he pounded the last staples in
And gathered tools to go,
The temperature had fallen,
The wind and snow began to blow.
When he finally reached his pickup,
He felt a heavy heart.
From the sound of that ignition
He knew it wouldn’t start.
So Jake did what most of us
Would do if we had been there.
He humbly bowed his balding head
And sent aloft a prayer.
As he turned the key for the last time,
He softly cursed his luck.
They found him three days later,
Frozen stiff in that old truck.
Now Jake had been around in life
And done his share of roaming.
But when he saw Heaven, he was shocked —
It looked just like Wyoming !
Of all the saints in Heaven, his favorite was St. Peter…..
So they sat and talked a minute or two,
Or maybe it was three.
Nobody was keeping’ score —
In Heaven, time is free.
‘I’ve always heard,’ Jake said to Pete ,
‘that God will answer prayer,
But the one time I asked for help,
Well, he just plain wasn’t there.’
‘Does God answer prayers of some,
And ignore the prayers of others?
That don’t seem exactly square —
I know all men are brothers.’
‘Or does he randomly reply,
Without good rhyme or reason?
Maybe, it’s the time of day,
The weather or the season.’
‘Now I ain’t trying to act smart,
It’s just the way I feel.
And I was wondering’, could you tell me —
What the heck’s the deal?!’
Peter listened very patiently
And when Jake was done,
There were smiles of recognition,
And he said, ‘So, you’re the one!!’
That day your truck, it wouldn’t start,
And you sent your prayer a-flying,
You gave us all a real bad time,
With hundreds of us trying.’
‘A thousand angels rushed,
To check the status of your file,
But you know, Jake , we hadn’t heard
From you in quite a while.’
‘And though all prayers are answered,
And God ain’t got no quota,
He didn’t recognize your voice.
He started a truck in Minnesota.’
BETTER KEEP IN TOUCH!
=============Clayton Douglas radio show Tuesday 10 am EST
A patriot wrote me this morning: “Super great job on the Colmes show,” and urged me to get on the radio much, much more.
Then another wrote me:
I am guessing that the jewboy named Alan Colmes is still recovering from his catastrophic defeat that he suffered on his own Alan Colmes Live Radio Talk Show. Like the Jewish FOOL that he is, Alan Colmes gambled and Alan Colmes lost that gamble against “The Great White Shark” named Mr. John de Nugent! Bravo to you John!
Just then, the phone rang — this gent was calling:
Clayton Douglas, a fiery patriot-intellectual with a rich cowboy-Western accent, just called me and invited me to be his guest on his live radio show this Tuesday at 10 am East Coast time.I said YES. (The show will of course be recorded and archived for later as an mp3 audiofile and on Blogtalk radio.)
I had heard of Clayton Douglas but I had no idea what a scholar and writer he was. And whether I agree with every one of his ideas or not, such as Christian Identity, or his militias, I respect a fighting man and red-blooded American who stands up for his values as a white man and a Christian. For we live in an age of cowardice, irresponsibility and incompetence, as Adolf Hitler described our judaized era of Aryan demoralization in his Second Book in 1928.We’ll be discussing my plans and views and also his own insights. Clayton is one amazing scholar, especially in his book Mystery Babylon, which despite the Identity-leaning cover is a brilliant analysis for ANY white patriot concerning the New World Order. It is bursting full of careful, factual ammunition for our struggle to 1) understand for ourselves the NWO and 2) convert others to our sacred Cause of white freedom under God for Aryans everywhere.
It is a terrible shame that John Kennedy imagined he could ride the tiger — and have jew assistants galore on his rise to superstar status and power — and not fall in the jew’s belly.
He was the last real president we had, ruling just 1961-63. All the subsequent men have been craven puppets of psychopathic Zion. (We just saw Jimmy Carter apologizing to the jews for saying even partial truths about their vast concentration camp-turkey shoots in the West Bank and Gaza.)
And they killed Kennedy, of course, on a kabbalistic, numerological day, 11/22 (of the year 1963) — always those multiples of the number 11.
Johnny, we hardly knew ye.
The last president of the United States. The USA that we once had died in 1963 in Dallas when Israel killed Kennedy for blocking their acquisition of nuclear weapons. As District Attorney Jim Garrison cried out to the grand jury, “They have slain your prince! His blood cries out still from the grave.” What we see now is a jew-possessed body — draping itself in a US flag — but inside it is a jewish soul, jewish laws, jewish greed and porn, abortion, homosexuality and racist hatred of white people and of Jesus Christ. It only barely LOOKS like the America I grew up in. And we don’t “fear change”; we fear change that we never VOTED FOR.
I found online this photo “Firth, Idaho rodeo with Noleen and her friends.” These are our precious white females to protect, cherish and defend. We must secure a future for white children. Are there any girls bonnier than our white lasses?
Leave a Reply