.
marcus-eli-ravage-Commissary-Gentiles
Full text:
Commissary to the Gentiles / The First to See the Possibilities of War by Propaganda
Marcus Eli Ravage
You Christians worry and complain about the Jews’ influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own.
And you declare that this state of affairs is a menace to your orderly development; it confuses your impulses; it defeats your purposes; it muddles up your destiny.
I do not altogether see the danger.
Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what the remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you appear to realize.
That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we did you when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. Suppose, we say tremblingly, you should wake up to the fact that your religion, your education, your morals, your (p476) social, governmental and legal systems, are fundamentally of our making! And then you specify, and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion-picture promoters, and our terror dissolves into laughter.
The goy, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our crimes.
We cannot make it out. Either you do not know or you have not the courage to charge us with those deeds for which there is at least a shadow of evidence and which an intelligent judge and jury could examine without impatience.
Why bandy about unconvincing trifles when you might so easily indict us for serious and provable offenses? Why throw up to us a patent and clumsy forgery such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion when you might as well confront us with the Revelation of St. John?
*** JdN
As for the Revelation of St. John, we certainly know the Jews hate this final book of the New Testament, both for its content and also for its author, the Apostle John, whose previous work, the Gospel of John, is openly antisemitic.
As stated, it refers countless times to Jesus’ enemies as “the Jews” and gives us confrontation after confrontation where, quote, “Jesus said to the Jews” and then things like “You are from your father, the Devil.”
The Revelation or Apocalypse of John itself, in chapter 2:9 and 3:9, refers to the Jews as “the synagogue of Satan.” 😉
This same book says, in chapter 13:18 that the great beast that serves the Antichrist will bear the number “666.”
Well, by amazing coincidence…
Also, 
And 
And 
And
And 
Another memorable image in the jew-hated Book of Revelation refers to the Great Whore of Babylon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whore_of_Babylon).
In Chapter 17, verse 5 we read of this female being: “the Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Prostitutes and Abominations of the Earth-”
Btw, the word translated as “prostitute” is actually “porn,” which is an Ancient Greek word for something filthy, and the New Testament was not written in Hebrew, but in the Aryan language of Greek, koiné Greek, which was the Greek used in the eastern part of the Roman Empire.
In Greek it was:
μυστηριον, Βαβυλὼν ἡ μεγάλη, ἡ μήτηρ τῶν πορνῶν καὶ τῶν βδελυγμάτων τῆς γῆς; transliterated Mysteriōn, Babylōn hē megalē, hē mētēr tōn pornōn kai tōn bdelygmatōn tēs gēs).
As is well known and admitted by Jews themselves, they absolutely dominate the porn industry worldwide. In fact, the infamous Jewish author Samuel Roth, who wrote several books bashing Gentiles in a similar vein to Marcus Eli Ravage, was arrested by the FBI and imprisoned several times for publishing porn novels.
In fact, Roth spent eight months for porn in various New York State prisons and then 1936 to 1939 in Lewisburg Federal Penitentiary, a maximum-security prison. And he was in there again for selling porn from 1957 to 1961, punished along with other “alumni” such as crooked union boss Jimmy Hoffa, the pro-Soviet spy and traitor Alger Hiss, the mafia boss John Gotti, and the Irish-American serial murderer and gangster Whitey Bulger.
This was the same Roth who wrote:
…and
[recording stop]
Now, going back to the image of the Great Whore of Babylon in the Book of Revelation, which Ravage mocks, “Babylon” obviously refers to the once vast semitic city of Babylon, which now lies in ruins in what is now Iraq, about 53 miles south of the modern capital of Baghdad.
.
This city, which straddled the Euphrates River and once had about 200,000 inhabitants, actually became the number-one city of Jewry for many centuries after Jerusalem was conquered by the Babylonian Empire and its irritating Jewish inhabitants were hauled away to what is now Iraq.
Ishtar, Queen of the Night, was a sex goddess in Babylon, a city full of sex temples
And it is here in this city of Babylon, capital of the Babylonian Empire, that the infamous Talmud was written, and hence it is properly called The Babylonian Talmud [photo], to distinguish it from the less important Jerusalem Talmud.
There have been foolish debates for centuries regarding to whom or to what “the Great Whore of Babylon” refers.
Some say it was a sly reference to the Roman Empire, but later this empire became Christian, and its eastern half lasted for over a thousand years as a devout Christian country and bastion against both Jewry and Islam.
And, as Wikipedia points out,
[noteworthy Christian theologians]Alan James Beagley, David Chilton, J. Massyngberde Ford, Peter Gaskell, Kenneth Gentry, Edmondo Lupieri, Bruce Malina, Iain Provan, J. Stuart Russell, [and] Milton S. Terry[24] point out that although Rome was the prevailing pagan power in the 1st century, when the Book of Revelation was written, the symbolism of the whore of Babylon does not refer to an invading infidel or foreign power.
It refers to an apostate false queen, a former “bride” who has been unfaithful and who, even though she has been divorced and cast out because of unfaithfulness, continues to falsely claim to be the “queen” of the spiritual realm.[25][26][27]
This symbolism [certainly] did not fit the case of Rome at the time. Proponents of this view suggest that the “seven mountains” in Rev 17:9 are the seven hills on which Jerusalem stands and the “fall of Babylon” in Rev 18 is the fall and destruction of Jerusalem [by the Roman legions under Titus] in 70 AD.[28]
Several Old Testament prophets referred to Jerusalem as being a spiritual harlot and a mother of such harlotry (Book of Isaiah 1:21; Book of Jeremiah 2:20; Jeremiah 3:1–11; Book of Ezekiel 16:1–43; Ezekiel 23, Epistle to the Galatians 4:25).
Some of these Old Testament prophecies, as well as the warnings in the New Testament concerning Jerusalem, are in fact very close to the text concerning Babylon in [the Book of] Revelation.
This suggests that John of Patmos may well have actually been citing those prophecies in his description of Babylon.[29]
For example, in Matthew 23:34–37 and Luke 11:47–51, Jesus himself assigned all of the bloodguilt for the killing of the prophets and of the saints (of all time) to the Pharisees of Jerusalem [who then dominated Judaism and later wrote the Babylonian Talmud].
In Revelation 17:6 and 18:20,24, almost identical phrasing is used in charging that very same bloodguilt to Babylon. This is also bolstered by Jesus’ statement that “it’s not possible for a prophet to be killed outside of Jerusalem.” (Luke 13:33).[30]
Furthermore, this harlot queen sounds just like Jewry:
(a) as ruling over the kings of the earth (Revelation 17:18) [which money can do]; (b) as sitting on seven mountains (Revelation 17:9), and Jerusalem’s seven hills are Mount Scopus, Mount Olivet and the Mount of Corruption (all three are peaks in a mountain ridge that lies east of the Old City), Mount Ophel, the original Mount Zion, and finally the New Mount Zion, the hill on which the [Roman] Antonia Fortress was built, part of the wall of which now forms the “Wailing Wall”; (c) as the center of the world’s merchandise (Revelation 18:3, 11–13); (d) as the corrupter of the nations (Revelation 17:2; 18:3; 19:2); (e) as the persecutor of the saints (Revelation 17:6).”[22]
[End of Wikipedia article]
So there you have all the reasons for Ravage to ridicule and hate the Book of Revelation. Recapitulating, this book, ascribed to the already very antisemitic Apostle John, calls Judaism “the Great Whore of Babylon,” the Antichrist “bearing the number 666,” and the very longitude and latitude of Jerusalem literally add up to this number, 666.
And if the Apostle John did write the Revelation, it would make perfect sense that he attacked Judaism, because in his Gospel, in the famous passage John 8:44, Jesus says to the Jews
“you are from your father, the Devil, a liar and murderer from the beginning.”
*** Back to Ravage
Why talk about Marx and Trotski when you have Jesus of Nazareth and Paul of Tarsus to confound us with ?
You call us subverters, agitators, revolution-mongers. It is the truth, and I cower at your discovery. [sarcasm]
It could be shown with only the slightest straining and juggling of the facts that we have been at the bottom of all the major revolutions in your history. We undoubtedly had a (p477) sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion [the Protestant Reformation], and it is simply a fact that we were the prime movers in the bourgeois democratic revolutions of the century before the last, both in France and America. If we were not, we did not know our own interests.
But do you point your accusing finger at us and charge us with these heinous and recorded crimes? Not at all!
You fantastically lay at our door the recent Great War [WWI] and the upheaval in Russia, which have done not only the most injury to the Jews themselves but which a school-boy could have foreseen would have that result.
*** JdN Again — rotten, filthy jew lies
The Jews, especially Jacob Schiff (photo), most certainly did finance, and they did run the Bolshevik coup d’état.
It was not a real revolution at all, btw, unlike the American Revolution, and in a population of around 14o million, it consisted merely of 40,000 murderous and determined bolsheviks, 80% of whom were Jews, and these Jewish desperados stormed certain key government buildings in St. Petersburg and captured the parliament and the tsar.
The Jewish Telegraph Agency, a longtime major Jewish wire service founded in 1917, wrote in its issue of 6 November 2017, in an article by “Cnaan Lipshitz,” of
“the outsized prevalence of Jews in the ranks of the revolution that broke out a century ago.”
It went on to quote Boruch Gorin, director of the $50 million Jewish Museum in Moscow:
“There was great and undeniable enthusiasm [for Bolshevism] among basically all the elements that made up Russian Jewry during the revolution.”
And the Jews most certainly did cause World War I.
They got the Ottoman Empire of Turkey into a war with Russia, England, France and the United States of America — because the sultan refused repeatedly to hand over Palestine, which was 78% muslim and 20% Christian, to Ashkenazi Jews from Europe.
The Jews’ goal then became to break up this Ottoman Turkish empire — and then take this piece of it, this land of Palestine, AND EXPEL ITS PEOPLE off it.
As Laurent Guyenot states on p166 of his “From Yahweh to Zion“:
Like [the Jewish prime minister of England, Benjamin] Disraeli,
[Theodor] Herzl [an early leader of modern Zionism]
first turned to the Ottoman Empire for help:
“If His Majesty the Sultan were to give us Palestine, we could in return undertake to regulate the whole finances of Turkey.”240
Herzl approached Sultan Abdul Hamid (photo) with this offer through emissaries (as reported in his journal, June 9, 1896):
“Let the Sultan give us that piece of land, and in return we shall set his house in order, straighten out his finances, and influence public opinion all over the world in his favor.”
In other words, he promised to devote to the service of Ottoman Turkey the two Jewish weapons par excellence: the bank and the press.
The Sultan categorically and repeatedly rejected all offers, saying, as reported in Herzl’s journal, June 19:
“I cannot sell even a foot of land, for it does not belong to me, but to my people. […] Let the Jews save their billions. […] If my Empire is partitioned, they might get Palestine for nothing.
But only our corpse will be divided. I will not agree to vivisection.”
As he had already done at the Berlin Congress [of 1878], the Sultan opposed any Jewish mass immigration to Palestine. Four years later, after many more attempts, Herzl concluded (June 4, 1900):
“At present I can see only one more plan: See to it that Turkey’s difficulties increase; wage a personal campaign against the Sultan, possibly seek contact with the exiled princes and the Young Turks; and, at the same time, by intensifying Jewish socialist activities, stir up the desire among the European governments to exert pressure on Turkey to take in the Jews.”
241
(pp170-71)
According to a report of the Palestine Royal Commission of 1937, Lloyd George explained the deal in those terms:
“Zionist leaders gave us a definite promise that, if the Allies committed themselves to giving facilities for the establishment of a national home for the Jews in Palestine, they would do their best to rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the Allied cause. They kept their word.” 251
Winston Churchill himself declared during the House of Commons debate on the Palestine Mandate, on July 4, 1922:
Canadian PM Robert Borden and Churchill
“Pledges and promises were made during the War, and they were made not only on the merits, though I think the merits are considerable.
They were made because it was considered they would be of value to us in our struggle to win the War.
It was considered that the support which the Jews [p170] could give us all over the world, and particularly in the United States, and also in Russia, would be a definite, palpable advantage.”
When on March 12, 1937, Churchill was called before the Palestine Royal Commission, he repeated the argument:
“I insist upon loyalty and upon the good faith of England to the Jews, to which I attach the most enormous importance, because we gained great advantages in the War.
We did not adopt Zionism entirely out of altruistic love of starting a Zionist colony: It was a matter of great importance to this country.
It was a potent factor on public opinion in America [….]”
So basically the Jews caused World War One, which killed twenty million Gentiles,
.. and wounded or crippled millions more….
so 1) they could get Palestine as their operations headquarters, not to mention 2) “kill off the best Gentiles,” a specific Talmudic command, and 3) get even richer off selling guns, ships and other products to the military.
Of course, they had to smash the Turkish Empire first to get their Palestine.
But since Turkey was allied with mighty Germany, first they had to try to smash Germany.
They did this by agitating Russia, France, England and America to attack Germany, spending millions of their own gentile lives and trillions of their hard-earned dollars for the secret benefit of the Jews.
Then Turkey would fall, its empire dismembered. Britain would get Palestine, and in the end the Jews would get Palestine from the Brits, ignoring the rights of the native Palestinians. In 1947 they violently drove most of them out, and made life wretched and miserable for those who stayed in their own land, now an intolerant, jewish-ruled hell.
*** Back to Ravage
But even these plots and revolutions are as nothing compared with the great conspiracy which we engineered at the beginning of this era [meaning from BC to AD, two thousand years ago, when Jesus was born] and which was destined to make the creed of a Jewish sect the religion of the Western world.
The Reformation was not designed in malice purely. It squared us with an ancient enemy [meaning the Roman Catholic Church] and restored our Bible [meaning the Old Testament] to its place of honor in Christendom.
The republican revolutions of the eighteenth century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities.
[This means getting citizenship and full rights and entrance into high society in various white countries, though they kept on considering themselves as part of the Jewish people.]
They benefited us, but they did you no harm. On the contrary, they prospered and expanded you. You owe your preeminence in the world to them.
[Hunh? What? Whites owed their world leadership to Jews? He kind of stuck this whopper in there, didn’t he? 😉 ]
But the upheaval which brought Christianity into Europe was — or at least may easily be shown to have been — planned and executed by Jews as an act of revenge against a great Gentile state.
[So after laying claim to all the great achievements of the white world since the Enlightenment, now he is claiming Christianity, a major world religion, was also their plan and their creation.]
And when you talk about Jewish conspiracies I cannot for the world understand why you do not mention the destruction of Rome and the whole civilization of antiquity concentrated under her banners, at the hands of Jewish Christianity.
It is unbelievable, but you Christians do not seem to know where your religion came from, nor how, nor why. Your historians, with one great exception, do not tell you. The documents in the case, which are part of your Bible, you chant over but do not read. We have done our work too thoroughly; you believe our propaganda too implicitly.
[Certainly, this is a valid point by Ravage — the vast majority of so-called Christians have never read the Bible at all.]
The coming of Christianity is to you not an ordinary historical event growing out of other events of the time; it is the fulfilment of a divine Jewish prophecy — with suitable amendments of your own. It did not, as you see it, destroy a great Gentile civilization and a great Gentile empire with which Jewry was at war; it did not plunge mankind into barbarism and darkness for a thousand years;…
[again, a gigantic lie and slander: it was the Roman Catholic Church which preserved in the monasteries during the Dark Ages Greco-Roman literature, learning, art and science]
….it came to bring salvation to the Gentile world!
Yet here, if ever, was a great subversive movement, hatched in Palestine, spread by Jewish agitators, financed by Jewish money, taught in Jewish pamphlets and broadsides, at a time when Jewry and Rome were in a death-struggle, and ending in the collapse of the great Gentile empire.
[There are so many things wrong with this claim. Christianity was not subversive; the jews were. It was not financed by Jewish money; Jewish financing got the Romans and the mobs persecuting it.]
You do not even see it, though an intelligent child, unbefuddled by theological magic, could tell you what it is all about after a hasty reading of the simple record.
And then you go on prattling of Jewish conspiracies, and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?
[“taken anti-Semites rather lightly”? Jews have never, ever done that.]
And, mind you, no less an author (p478) than [the nasty, anti-Christian Freemason Edward] Gibbon long ago tried to enlighten you. It is now a century and a half [or since 1788] since “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” let the cat out of the bag.
Gibbon, not being a parson dabbling in history, did not try to account for the end of a great era by inventing fatuous nonsense about the vice and degradation of Rome, about the decay of morals and faith in an empire which was at that very time in the midst of its most glorious creative period.
How could he? He was living in the Augustan Age in London which — in spite of nearly two thousand years since the coming of Christian salvation — was as good a replica of Augustan Rome in the matter of refined lewdness as the foggy islanders could make it.
No, Gibbon was a race-conscious Gentile and an admirer of the culture of the pagan West, as well as a historian with brains and eyes.
*** JdN but so was Emperor Constantine, who admired pagan culture but made Christianity the favored religion of the Roman Empire, and ended all persecution of it, certainly not to destroy his own empire, but obviously to strengthen it.
***
Therefore he had no difficulty laying his finger on the malady that had rotted and wasted away the noble edifice of antique civilization.
*** JdN
Well, as for the “noble edifice of antique civilization,” it was a pretty mixed bag. Rome was both a great civilizing power, but also capable of incredible cruelty, and Christianity, founded as a religion of love and mercy under a God who was (quote) “our heavenly father,” was an understandable reaction to these constant, violent horrors.
Anyone who has seen the movie “Gladiator” with Russell Crowe
…..or “The Passion,” the film by Mel Gibson about the whipping and crucifixion of Jesus,
….knows that regular Romans were in love with violence, hence the gladiator games, and truly savage in using it to conquer others.
When the king of Pontus (now in Turkey) died and willed that his kingdom become a province of Rome, the locals were shocked when the Romans introduced gladiator games, which is basically forcing men to kill each other for entertainment, for the pleasure of a howling mob that wanted to see real blood and gore.
When the Romans became aggressive toward another people, it was to get them to surrender and then pay enormous taxes, collected by corrupt and arrogant Roman officials who lined their own pockets. If they did not surrender, the Romans would invade and slaughter them, killing most of the men or making them into slaves in the mines or galleys, working them slowly to death.
As for the women, Romans forced them to become sex slaves, or domestic slaves. All these slaves, those who had lost a war with Rome that Rome had started, had no legal rights, and could be put to death or worked to death for any or no reason. If any slaves revolted or poisoned their master, then they all would be crucified. The excellent HBO series “Rome” shows a lot of this mind-bending cruelty.
The role models for classical civilization were of course the Greco-Roman gods, who also were hyper-violent, not to mention tyrannical, and as far back as Homer in the Iliad and later on, Socrates and Plato, the Greeks were both disgusted and afraid of them.
Every Greek knew that the god Apollo had grabbed and skinned alive a satyr who challenged him to a lyre contest.
Zeus, king of the gods, shape-shifted into a bull and seized a girl named Europa, after whom, btw, the continent of Europe is named, took her to an island and raped her there.
Artemis (or Diana for the Romans), the goddess who was the sister of Apollo, was bathing nude in a stream when a hunter, Actaeon, accidentally came upon her. She transformed him into a deer and had her fifty dogs rip him limb from limb.
An Artemis statue found at Pompeii, with the original coloring reconstructed
.
As for the famous (but horrific) Trojan War, it started as a squabble between three vain goddesses over who was the most beautiful.
Anyone who has read Euripides’ play “Trojan Women,” called the most anti-war play of all times, knows that the Ancient Greeks, who certainly were the core of what Ravage praises as “ancient pagan civilization,” were appallingly cruel to the women of Troy after Troy was captured.
The Greek warrior Ajax seizes Cassandra, daughter of King Priam of Troy, to be his sex slave
In a Pompeii mural, the defeated King Priam looks on in grief as his daughter, Cassandra, is dragged away from the sacred pillar in the temple of Athena, the Palladium, and is then raped right there by Ajax. The goddess Athena later sends a thunderbolt, which sinks Ajax’s ship.
So this was the dark side of classical civilization, which Christians partly rejected, calling the pagan gods “demons.”
And it is this worship instead of a just and loving God who also created the universe which the Jew Marcus Eli Ravage slanders as a “malady.”
***
Continued here
Arrogant Jew Ravage lies that Jewry invented Christianity to destroy Rome III