Hitler on race and religion with his only mentor, Dietrich Eckart, in their booklet “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin”
[being edited]
But when Jesus WAS shown, it was never with black hair and a hooked nose.
It just never occurred to anyone, THEN OR NOW, that a man who gave His life for love, forgiveness, humility and justice — and denounced lies, vengeance, domination, materialism and greed could possibly look like a Jew. 😉
This is how the early Christians remembered Paul, who was also in Rome, as very jewy.
This is how they saw Jesus and Mary:
Close-up of the boy Jesus
Traversing the sky in a chariot, Jesus, the blond risen Lord, has sunbeams emerging from his head
Close-up of “the Lord”
But of course if Jesus incarnated in Palestine in order to reform the Jews, He would not wish to appear as a golden-haired, six-foot-tall Swede to them, looking like a total foreigner, but instead look similar to the lighter-skinned, -haired and -eyed Jews among them who lived at that time.
One can assume that Jesus did not look extraordinary, or else there would be stories in the New Testament about, say, how tall Hew was, and how handsome He was, or that He was ugly, or plain, in the other case… or what wide shoulders He had, etc. It seems that His appearance was not the most striking thing about him, but rather the things He said and did that were extraordinary.
Jesus in a recent Hollywood movie — always with very light-brown or near-blond hair, We just cannot imagine a divine man or angel any other way.
Jesus as portrayed by English actor Robert Powell of Manchester in Franco Zeffirelli’s excellent 1977 British-Italian miniseries “Jesus of Nazareth”
Jesus as seen by the Mormons, resolute and manly
Now here is a real Jew –the diabolical and cunning David Axelrod, elections guru who in 2008 and 2012 got Barack Hussein Obama elected president
:
Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security under Bush II
……The Jews of today do not descend from the Jews back then
According to the Israeli bestseller The Invention of the Jewish People by Professor Shlomo Sand of Tel Aviv, most Jews today descend not from the Jews of Bible times but from either Khazars (Huns and Turks) if they are Ashkenazim (light-skinned European Jews), or if they are Sephardim (swarthy Middle Eastern Jews), then from various Arabic or otherwise Semitic peoples in northern Africa or the Middle East whom rabbis converted to Judaism during a very long phase when Judaism was in fact very much a missionary religion, converting people to itself, and very unlike today.
.https://www.amazon.com/Invention-Jewish-People-Shlomo-Sand/dp/1844676234
A historical tour de force, The Invention of the Jewish People offers a groundbreaking account of Jewish and Israeli history. Exploding the myth that there was a forced Jewish exile in the first century at the hands of the Romans, Israeli historian Shlomo Sand argues that most modern Jews descend from converts, whose native lands were scattered across the Middle East and Eastern Europe.
In this iconoclastic work, which spent nineteen weeks on the Israeli bestseller list and won the coveted Aujourd’hui Award in France, Sand provides the intellectual foundations for a new vision of Israel’s future.
Shlomo Sand studied history at the University of Tel Aviv and at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales in Paris.
He currently teaches contemporary history at the University of Tel Aviv.
His books include The Invention of the Jewish People, On the Nation and the Jewish People, L’Illusion du politique: Georges Sorel et le débat intellectuel 1900 [= “The Illusion of Politics: Georges Sorel and the Intellectual Debate in 1900”], Georges Sorel en son temps [ = “Georges Sorel in his time”], Le XXe siècle à l’écran [ = “The twentieth century on the screen”] and Les Mots et la terre: les intellectuels en Israël [ = “The Words and the Earth: Intellectuals in Israel”].
Shockingly, Sand proved that the actual descendants of the ancient Palestinian Jews are the Palestinians of today! When the Romans crushed the two big Jewish revolts in Palestine, the first in AD 66-73 under Nero, Vespasian and Titus, and the second in AD 132 when Hadrian was the emperor, the Roman legions did NOT drive all the Jews out of Palestine, only out of Jerusalem.
Most of the Jews stayed in Palestine, though their temple and capital were gone, and later they became Christians after Constantine the Great began Christianizing the Roman Empire, starting in AD 312.
When the Arab Muslims swept into Palestine in AD 636, these former Jews, now Christians for centuries, began gradually to become muslims over a period of 600 years, often just to avoid persecution, “dhimmi” status and special taxes. Also, only Muslims were allowed to ride horses or bear arms.
As Wikipedia also informs us, “[the Egyptian ruler Ibrahim Pasha’s conquests [in Palestine in 1834] had a significant demographic change as the region of Palestine had an influx of Muslim tribal immigrants.”
Today these people are “the Palestinians.” But their ancestors WERE the Jews — at the time of Jesus.
This brave Palestinian girl, Ahed Tamimi, was sentenced in March 2018 to eight months in an Israeli jail for slapping an Israeli occupation soldier. Her whole village of Nabi Salih is full of people with blue eyes, even 1,382 years after the semitic Arabs began pouring into Palestine.
As the liberal Israeli Uri Avnery wrote in the Ha’aretz newspaper, Ahed is from a whole village of blue-eyed Palestinians. Below is a 2015 incident, and seems to be the same Ahed taking the lead.
Location of the village of Nabi Saleh where Ahed Tamimi and family live on the West Bank (which once was called Samaria)
Notice the other children also have light hair. The Israeli soldiers are swarthier.
“In this Friday, Aug, 28, 2015 photo, Palestinian women and youth scuffle with an Israeli soldier trying to arrest a 12-year-old boy during a protest near the West Bank village of Nabi Salih. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabi_Salih It is a muslim village of 600 near Ramallah. The Tamimi family specifically has suffered terribly under the Israelis and hates them with a justified passion.
…..Jesus as depicted in early Christian paintings in Imperial Rome
A depiction on the wall of a Christian catacomb under Rome, with the Alpha and Omega letters to either side. Both the apostle Paul (a suspicious character for Hitler and Eckhart) and the (genuine) apostle Peter, who had personally known Jesus for His entire ministry, lived in Rome for years, and were executed there at the instigation of slanderous Jews. Therefore, Jesus’ appearance, and Paul’s, and Peter’s, were known in Rome.
Jesus with light-brown hair in a catacomb owned by the wealthy Christian breadmaker Bosio. Catacombs were dugout of very soft rock — called ” tufa” — where about six million ancient Romans were buried during the days of the Roman Republic and Empire. Once you dug out a space in this soft, moist rock, the tufa rock was exposed to the air, dried out, and hardened, making walls and ceilings.
.
Jesus is depicted with auburn hair in the Church of St. Pudentiana (now Santa Pudenziana) in Rome, erected around AD 410 on the site of the very first church in Rome, which had been built around AD 150. (Before the Christians began building formal churches, they used to meet in the private homes of well-off believers — who often were women, and very much into a God-is-Love deity. They regularly dined together — adding songs, prayers, a brotherly kiss, a meal, wine and a sermon — so private homes were ideal. Later, as Christianity grew, believers rented meeting halls or rooms,and finally built churches, basilicas and, in the Middle Ages, giant cathedrals.)
.
Close-up of Jesus
.
I repeat that the Roman congregation was founded by men who actually knew Jesus.
Adolf Hitler painted Mary and Jesus in this way in 1912 in Munich, and always said that anyone who read the words of Jesus could sense that he was an Aryan.
When I was a Jehovah’s Witness, way back in 1970-75, Jesus was always depicted as sort of a handsome Italian with white features and and bone structure, brown hair, and light-brown eyes.
Satan offers Jesus the kingdoms of the world, which are his to give — a reflection of a kind of sordid reality about the world that even (or especially) today remains true.
.
A Pharisee (from the group that later wrote the Gentile-hating Talmud) argues with Jesus over His healing of a blind man on the Sabbath.
.
Jesus resurrecting Lazarus. The Old Testament prophets Elijah (1 Kings 17:17-23) and Elisha (2 Kings 4:8-37) also resurrected dead men. The Talmud — written by the grandsons of the Pharisees who actually knew Jesus — absolutely that concedes Jesus was a real person, that He did perform miracles, and that even the using of His name by other healers who were not even Christians could effect a miracle.
.
Peter Schafer-Jesus in the Talmud-Princeton University Press (2007)
In fact, one rabbi healed another when dying by pronouncing the name of Jesus. For this both were chastised severely by the elder rabbis, as, according to the Talmud, Jesus was a blasphemer who now is suffering the punishment of a blasphemer down in hell, in fact, boiling in hot feces.
Note here the fate of Jesus in hell. [Onqelos, who questions the putative Jesus who is imprisoned in Hell, represents supposedly the man who translated the Hebrew Bible into Aramaic.]
Transcription:
He [Onqelos] went and brought up Jesus the Nazarene (Yeshu hanotzri)/the
sinners of Israel (posh< e Yisrael)11 out of his/their grave(s)
84 Chapter 8
by necromancy and asked him/them: Who is important in that
world?
He/they [Jesus/the sinners of Israel] answered: Israel!
[Onqelos:] What then about joining them?
[Jesus/the sinners of Israel:] Seek their welfare, seek not their
harm. Whoever touches them is as though he touches the apple of
his [God’s] eye!12
[Onqelos:] What is your punishment?
[Jesus/the sinners of Israel:] With boiling excrement.
……The cross as a Christian symbol came along way, way later
Crucifixion back then was seen as what it really was, a truly horrible thing.
We must recall that the Romans back then were still routinely crucifying 1) thieves, 2) pirates (Julius Caesar was once held by pirates, and threatened them with crucifixion, a threat he later carried out when, later on he had the power in Rome), 3) slaves in open revolt, 4) highwaymen, and 5) murderers — and the Romans continued doing crucifixions centuries.
It could take days to die this way, from exhaustion (it was impossible to breathe without a huge and painful effort), plus there was thirst, sunburn, hunger and exposure to the cold night air. In dry climates, the lack of humidity means the air releases its heat at night. Temperatures can fall from 100 during the day to 40 before dawn.
Crucifixion was one of the main means of execution for really heinous crimes. (Beheading was considered far more merciful, or letting a man open his own veins.)
I have been preparing my very important audiobook and on-line book on what Adolf Hitler and Dietrich Eckart thought of Jesus (which was reverence), and of the Old Testament and Judaism, which was very negative.
Their view of the OT was, in fact, extremely negative, and so one could call the two friends, Eckart and Hitler, “extreme Marcionites.” (Bishop Marcion was a Christian bishop who correctly rejected the Old Testament and its harsh tribal god Yahweh, and believed that Jesus came from and worshiped a different and loving God.)
They felt awe of Jesus and saw Him as a radical reformer, preaching another God altogether — a “heavenly father,” as Jesus called Him, hence the Lord’s Prayer, the prayer which Jesus taught his disciples, opens, famously, with this address to God: “Our Father, who art in Heaven.” Jesus’ god is a “God of love,” not the “jealous” deity the Jews had in their Yahweh.
I will never forget an episode of “The Simpsons” cartoon show, which has been running for 29 years now, where one of the characters exclaims about the God of the Jews, that he seems not just jealous but insecure, always wanting constant praise and worship and emphasizing “I, the Lord, am a jealous God” and one who punishes whole generations for the sins of their ancestors. No loving earthly father would ever talk to his children about how jealous he is and wants praise and adoration the way Yahweh talks to his Old Testament Jews, who, furthermore, drift away from Him constantly for other gods.
Earliest photo of the young activist Hitler, 1920, age 31 (screenshot from an early newsreel), with Bavarian flags.
His mentor Eckart was a newspaperman, poet, spiritual thinker and successful playwright and theater producer. One of his plays ran 600 times in Berlin, making him wealthy.
Anyway, Margi suggested I read an excellent monograph in Spanish about Jesus by our friend, the NS and historian Joaquin Bochaca, of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, El mito del judaismo de Cristo, that is, “The Myth of the Jewishness of Jesus”.
Bochaca
.https://johndenugent.com/images/Mito-del-judaismo-del-cristo-bochaca.pdf
In it I found already these interesting passages, which I was able to verify elsewhere:
***
“The truth is what they make you believe,” said Voltaire. Today, one of those “truths” is the Jewishness of Christ. “Jesus Christ was a Jew” is a phrase which, if pronounced only a couple of centuries ago, could have cost its author the rigors of the Inquisition.
But in our time this same phrase, by dint of being repeated, in print and orally, millions of times, has become an axiom, a common place, something so undoubted that if it is still repeated often now, it is almost with the sole purpose of serving as a shield or moral bond given to this or that group of Jews to guard against the reaction by us non-Jews against their commercial, political or social methods.
When someone says, for example, that the inventors and the vast majority of the propagators of communism are Jews, or that Jews are the overwhelming majority of the members of the international financial scam, and that they are also – and they were – such or such a pornography dealer, swindler, or a crapulous criminal such as Ginzberq, Stavisky [JdN: one could add Bernie Madoff today], instead of replying with logical and coherent arguments – as can obviously be done, with greater or lesser success – instead a swarm of pious clerics and kindly laity will tell you unctuously that “our Lord, Jesus Christ, was a Jew, too.”
Jesus was raised in Nazareth in Galilee, in the far north of Palestine.
In Hebrew the word “Galilee” means
“District of Gentiles,”
literally “Galil [district] ha [of] Goyim.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galilee
Galilee has nice, cool mountains, a huge lake, “the Sea of Galilee” [photo] and many rivers, sort of like Northern California.
Galilee attracted many settlers for many centuries, most of them not Jews, but in fact Whites (Ancient Greeks, Scythians (proto-Slavs?), Macedonians — Northern Greeks — of Alexander the Great, and the Romans). https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-ancient-roman-legion-base-found-in-megiddo-1.5290705
Roman road leading into Syria
A lemon orchard
The Old Testament itself tells how the Jews were wicked, and so God (Yahweh) let the king of Assyria conquer them, hauling all of them off as permanent troublemakers to Babylon and what is now Iraq.
The Assyrian monarch then settled lots of other people — whom Jews call “Gentiles” — in the lovely land of Galilee.
*** Returning to the Bochaca text:
The Hungarian Ferenc [Bochaca writes “Zajhty” but I believe he means “Szalasi”] claims that “the Jews were sure that Jesus was not of their race. ” [Bochaca refers to a book in Hungarian which would translate as “Millennial Hungary.]
Zajhty asserts that, in the seventh century BC. the Assyrian king Shalmaneser [V] carried away the whole population of Galilee, which even then was only partially Jewish. The Scythian shepherds and the new Greek, Assyrian and Macedonian colonists, who subsequently occupied the space of displaced populations, adopted the Jewish religious creed, but, according to the expression of the Jews themselves, “they were only under Jewish laws” ” The Jews,” Zajhty avers, “never accepted the Galileans as true descendants of the holy patriarch Abraham.”
During the centuries preceding the birth of Christ, we can confirm the immigration of numerous colonies of Phoenicians and Greeks in Galilee, according to Houston Stewart Chamberlain [in his Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, p285 in the Spanish version Bochaca used) and especially in Albert Réville ( Jésus de Nazareth, vol. I, p167) who points out that immigration by the semites [ = Phoenicians] exceeded by two to one those of the Aryans (Greeks and Macedonians).
Alexander the Great in 331 a.C. expelled those [same Phoenician] settlers from Samaria, replacing them with [some of his own] Macedonians; an important part of those Macedonians coming from the District of the Gentiles, Galilee. (Houston Stewart Chamberlain, ibid., p289)
It is beyond doubt that in the lands of Galilee, fertile and easily accessible – – unlike Judea, which was practically incommunicado — a multitude of races cohabited, with the exception of what is properly called the Jewish race.
In the Old Testament it is recounted how the Galilean villagers interpreted the multiplication of wild beasts [lions, bears, etc.] in their territory as a sign of the revenge by the gods of the country. They delegated a embassy to the king of the Assyrians, asking them to send them an Israelite priest from those whom he had taken as captives. The priest came and taught the Galileans how to worship the God of Jerusalem.
…..2 Kings chapter 17 Assyrian removes the Jews from Galilee; pagans replace them and out of fear worship Yahweh along with their own gods
.
Hoshea Last King of Israel
17 In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, Hoshea son of Elah became king of Israel in Samaria, and he reigned nine years. 2 He did evil in the eyes of the Lord, but not like the kings of Israel who preceded him.
3 Shalmaneser king of Assyria came up to attack Hoshea, who had been Shalmaneser’s vassal and had paid him tribute. 4 But the king of Assyria discovered that Hoshea was a traitor, for he had sent envoys to so [Osorkon?], king of Egypt, and he no longer paid tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year.
Therefore Shalmaneser seized him and put him in prison. 5 The king of Assyria invaded the entire land, marched against Samaria and laid siege to it for three years. 6 In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria [ now apparently Sargon II; photo right] captured Samaria and deported the Israelites to Assyria. He settled them in Halah, in Gozan on the Habor River and in the towns of the Medes.
Israel Exiled Because of Sin
7 All this took place because the Israelites had sinned against Yahweh their God, who had brought them up out of Egypt from under the power of Pharaoh king of Egypt. They worshiped other gods 8 and followed the practices of the nations Yahweh had driven out before them, as well as the practices that the kings of Israel had introduced. 9 The Israelites secretly did things against Yahweh their God that were not right. From watchtower to fortified city they built themselves high places in all their towns. 10 They set up sacred stones and Asherah poles on every high hill and under every spreading tree. 11 At every high place they burned incense, as the nations whom Yahweh had driven out before them had done. They did wicked things that aroused Yahweh’s anger. 12 They worshiped idols, though Yahweh had said, “You shall not do this.”[b]
13 Yahweh warned Israel and Judah through all His prophets and seers: “Turn from your evil ways. Observe my commands and decrees, in accordance with the entire Law that I commanded your ancestors to obey and that I delivered to you through my servants the prophets.”
14 But they would not listen and were as stiff-necked as their ancestors, who did not trust in Yahweh their God. 15 They rejected his decrees and the covenant he had made with their ancestors and the statutes he had warned them to keep. They followed worthless idols and themselves became worthless. They imitated the nations around them although Yahweh had ordered them, “Do not do as they do.”
16 They forsook all the commands of Yahweh their God and made for themselves two idols cast in the shape of calves, and an Asherah pole. They bowed down to all the starry hosts, and they worshiped Baal.17 They sacrificed their sons and daughters in the fire. They practiced divination and sought omens and sold themselves to do evil in the eyes of the Lord, arousing his anger.
18 So Yahweh was very angry with Israel and removed them from his presence. Only the tribe of Judah was left, 19 and even Judah did not keep the commands of the Lord their God. They followed the practices Israel had introduced. 20 Therefore Yahweh rejected all the people of Israel; he afflicted them and gave them into the hands of plunderers,until he thrust them from his presence.
21 When he tore Israel away from the house of David, they made Jeroboam son of Nebat their king. Jeroboam enticed Israel away from following Yahweh and caused them to commit a great sin. 22 The Israelites persisted in all the sins of Jeroboam and did not turn away from them 23 until Yahweh removed them from his presence, as He had warned through all his servants the prophets. So the people of Israel [= the northern kingdom, as opposed to Judah, the southern kingdom; see note that follows] were taken from their homeland into exile in Assyria, and they are still there.
*** JdN The word “Samaria” refers to all the “Northern Kingdom” that was ruled from the royal town of Samaria, both what is now called Samaria today (the central section of Israel), and also Galilee in this far north, as per this standard map of the borders in around 800 BC:
Samaria Resettled
24 The king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Kuthah, Avva, Hamath and Sepharvaim and settled them in the towns of Samaria to replace the Israelites. They took over Samaria and lived in its towns.
25When they first lived there, they did not worship the Lord; so he sent lions among them and they killed some of the people. 26 It was reported to the king of Assyria: “The people you deported and resettled in the towns of Samaria do not know what the god of that country requires. He has sent lions among them, which are killing them off, because the people do not know what he requires.”
27 Then the king of Assyria gave this order: “Have one of the priests you took captive from Samaria go back to live there and teach the people what the god of the land requires.” 28 So one of the priests who had been exiled from Samaria came to live in Bethel and taught them how to worship the Lord.
29 Nevertheless, each national group made its own gods in the several towns where they settled, and set them up in the shrines the people of Samaria had made at the high places. 30 The people from Babylon made Sukkoth Benoth, those from Kuthah made Nergal, and those from Hamath made Ashima; 31 the Avvites made Nibhaz and Tartak, and the Sepharvites burned their children in the fire as sacrifices to Adrammelekand Anammelek, the gods of Sepharvaim. 32
They worshiped the Lord, but they also appointed all sorts of their own people to officiate for them as priests in the shrines at the high places.
33 They worshiped Yahweh, but they also served their own gods in accordance with the customs of the nations from which they had been brought. 34 To this day they persist in their former practices. They neither worship Yahweh nor adhere to the decrees and regulations, the laws and commands that Yahweh gave the descendants of Jacob, whom he named Israel.
35 When Yahweh made a covenant with the Israelites, he commanded them: “Do not worship any other gods or bow down to them, serve them or sacrifice to them. 36 But Yahweh, who brought you up out of Egypt with mighty power and outstretched arm, is the one you must worship. To him you shall bow down and to him offer sacrifices.37 You must always be careful to keep the decrees and regulations, the laws and commands he wrote for you. Do not worship other gods. 38 Do not forget the covenant I have made with you, and do not worship other gods. 39 Rather, worship Yahweh your God; it is he who will deliver you from the hand of all your enemies.”
40 They would not listen, however, but persisted in their former practices. 41 Even while these people were worshiping the Lord, they were serving their idols. To this day their children and grandchildren continue to do as their ancestors did.
*** JdN
The Galileans’ theory, like that of all pagans, was that every place on earth — plains, mountains, rivers, etc. — had its own god, and that with his people taken away, the god of Galilee, Yahweh, was angry at no longer being worshiped.
So the Gentile Galileans followed His law — without becoming Jews (via drastic things like circumcision, or expensive Temple worship, etc.), thus belonging to a category of Gentiles which the Jews call “the God Fearers.”;-)
The second wife of the mad emperor Nero, Poppaea, was just such a “God Fearer” — a Gentile who prayed to Yahweh, probably did not eat pork, etc. — and she was the monster who incited the emperor Nero [photo] to blame the Great Fire in Rome, which had caused outrage against him, on the innocent Christians, leading to them being burned alive and fed to the lions.
.
This painting below is of a later massacre of Christians, burned alive and crucified at the instigation of slanderous Jews, or fed to the lions.
(The Colosseum, the “Flavian Amphitheater,” had not been built by the time of Nero, but it was running ten years later. The word “flavius,” by the way, means “blond” in Latin, and is the name of the imperial dynasty that ruled Rome between AD 69 and 96, meaning Vespasian and his two sons, Titus and Domitian.)
The Jews lied to the crowds and the Roman authorities that Christians killed and ate babies, drank blood, had sex with their own siblings, and hated everyone else. They told the pagans that every calamity that befell them was because the Christians did not worship the pagan gods but a black magic practitioner — the evil Jesus, whom Rome had executed. When Christians were to be burned, Jews would run and gather firewood for the fuel. No wonder the Book of Revelation refers to the Jews as “the synagogue of Satan.”
*** Back to Bochaca:
This is how the inhabitants of northern Palestine (Samaria and Galilee) became Jews because of religion, even when the Samaritans had very little Jewish blood in their veins, and the Galileans practically none. [Heinrich] Graetz [a very famous Jewish historian of the later 1800s] says that, between the invasions — followed by deportations — of the Assyrians, a small number of Jews had re-infiltrated into Galilee, dedicating themselves to commercial activities and money changing [and NOT to converting the Gentiles].
According to Book of the Maccabees, part one, the Hebrew leader Simon Tharsi gathered all the Jews who had returned to Galilee and forced them all without exception to return to Judea in the year 164 B.C.
Strikingly, Scythians also settled in Galilee and even had their own city, “Scythopolis.” The Scythians were Indo-Europeans from what is now Ukraine, and fierce warriors, especially as archers on horseback.
They were perhaps early Slavs — or early Aryan Iranians who later became absorbed by the Slavs. (Slavic and Iranian are related Eastern-Aryan languages.)
Map showing (encircled in the lower right) the city of Scythopolis
The originality of the Galilean national character is marked by another infallible sign: their language.
In the time of Christ, down in Judea people spoke in Aramaic. The Hebrew language was already back then a dead language, only surviving in the sacred writings (such as the Old Testament and the early Talmud).
The Galileans used another dialect of Aramaic that was so different from that employed by the Jews that even a servant of the High Priest, Caiaphas, during the trial of Jesus, could say to Peter:
“Your accent betrays you as a Galilean.”
The Galileans were even forbidden to pray aloud, since their faulty pronunciation excited hilarity, said the great French author Ernest Renan.
It was apparently almost impossible for Galileans to pronounce some of the sounds of Jewish-Aramaic, which was very guttural. This fact, according to Houston Stewart Chamberlain, denotes a physical difference in the structure of the larynx of the Galileans compared with that of the Jews. One may presume a strong contribution of Aryan blood to the Galileans because of this absence of harsh, guttural sounds.
The guttural “kh-” and “gh-” sounds that are common to all Semitic peoples practically do not exist among the Aryans (except for the Dutch and Afrikaners, and let it be noted that whrn huge numbers of Sephardic Jews left Spain in 1492 when Queen Isabella expelled them, where did they go? To HOLLAND.
https://ask.metafilter.com/108789/How-do-I-pronounce-gutturals-in-Hebrew-and-Arabic
(Humorous video about hyper-guttural semitic sounds)
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLqYQbOCGJc
It is very true that Arabic and Hebrew have non-stop “hacking” sounds. But the language substrate of the Galileans was not so guttural.
And yes, Greeks were colonizing everywhere around the Mediterranean, and long, long before Alexander. It is possible Greeks were also in the beautiful, cool mountain air of Galilee, though they generally avoided Asia, with its tyrannical governments, for the central and western Mediterranean, but we also know they did setttle in Libya and Egypt.
Greek colonies in blue (and Phoenician in red); 30 different Greek city-states sent out colonists
The Ancient Greeks and Trojans were sometimes very nordic.
Ganymede
The head of the Greek gods, Zeus, sent an eagle to abduct Ganymede and take him off to live with the gods and become immortal. His grieving father Thos (lower right) was later compensated with two gorgeous horses from Mount Olympus. Note the yellow paint on the hair of both son and father. (Note also the muscles. The Greeks “worked out” constantly, did bodybuilding, and literally every man was a soldier.)
The separation between Jews and Galileans was so pronounced that, according to Father Franz Michel Willam in his (German-language) 1932 work Das Leben Jesu im Lande und Volke Israel [ =The Life of Jesus in the Country and People of Israel], page 146, there was a saying:
“The Galileans value honor more than money;
the Jews money more than honor. “
Willam was a village priest in Vorarlberg, Austria but also an outstanding author. His “Life of Jesus in the Land and among the People of Israel” was published in ten editions in German and was translated into twelve languages. It was his masterpiece, a real bestseller in its day, and it made Willam famous internationally. (He was later a mentor to the priest and scholar Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI.)
Willam, left and Ratzinger, right
In the original German
The French historian Raoul Patry (PhD in theology in 1899 from the Sorbonne/Paris) recalls that in the time of Jesus, Galilee and Perea had their own autonomous tetrarch, while Judea and Idumea were subject to a Roman procurator.
“The political separation between Jews of race,” says Patry, “and Jews of religion, the former in Judea and the latter in Galilee, was complete.”
Patry notes that the contemporaries of Jesus called him “the Galilean” and “the Nazarene,” and not “the Bethlehemite,” so though he was born in Judea, he was not viewed as a Judean. — Patry, Raoul: La réligion dans l’Allemagne d’aujourd’hui, Paris: Payot, 1926, p165.
Galilee
Jesus came from the town of Nazareth in Galilee. This northern territory of Palestine was also his most important area of activity.
Apart from the larger towns of Sepphoris and Tiberias, Galilee was a country area, and agriculture was the main occupation. The Lake of Gennesaret was famous for its fishing. Jesus is said to have found his first disciples among fishermen (Mark 1:16-29).
In the time of Jesus Galilee was surrounded by a number of Greek cities. There was also in Galilee a group of ten Greek towns – the Decapolis. The rest of the area was Jewish.
Samaria
South of Galilee lived the Samaritans, a mixed population resulting from political transfers of population, whom the Jews did not consider to be real Jews.
While the Jewish Temple was situated on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, the Samaritans regarded Mt. Gerizim as sacred. They recognized as Holy Scripture only the five books of Moses, and the textual form they used was different from that in use among the Jews.
Judaea
The name Judaea had two different senses. Firstly, it meant the area surrounding Jerusalem, secondly it meant the whole area inhabited by Jews, which finally became a Roman province.
The mountainous region surrounding Jerusalem is dry and bare. To the east is the Dead Sea. In the oasis area north of the Dead Sea is Jericho, which is thought to be one of the oldest towns in the world.
Jerusalem
To the Jews Jerusalem was the centre of the world, where God dwelt in the Temple. The Jews went there on pilgrimage at least once a year. It was also the economic, administrative and cultural centre. The Roman administration of Palestine was directed from Caesarea.
The Herodian Dynasty
At the time of the birth of Jesus Palestine was ruled by the Roman vassal king Herod the Great, who was renowned for his great building projects and for his arbirtrary actions and ruthlessness, which towards the end of his rule became sheer paranoia.
After the death of Herod his dominion was divided into three parts among his sons, who continued as Roman vassals.
Archelaus was given control of Judaea and the region of Perea east of the Jordan. He was, however, a bad king. In 6 A.D. the complaints of his subjects led to his being exiled by the Emperor to Gaul. At the same time Judaea, Samaria and Idumaea were united to form the province of Judaea, whose administrator was – under the imperial legate of Syria – a representative of Rome, at first a prefect, later a procurator.
Galilee was ruled by Archelaus’ brother Antipas. His actions, too, caused bad blood among his subjects. For instance, John the Baptist criticized Antipas, who eventually had him executed (see Mark 6:14-29). As a result of political intrigue Antipas too was exiled to Gaul in 39 A.D.
The only one of Herod the Great’s sons to be a successful ruler was Philip, who ruled from Galilee the regions of Trachonitis, Gaulanitis, Batanaea and Auranitis to the south-east.
Pilate
During the period 26-36 the Roman representative in Judaea was Pontius Pilate, who failed to understand the religious feelings of the Jews. This led to repeated conflicts and protests, and in suppressing them Pilate showed cruelty and a tendency to use strong measures. Pilate’s career was finally interrupted as a result of complaints made to the Emperor by his subjects.
The Jewish War
After the rule of Pilate the situation in Palestine became more and more tense and finally came to a head in the revolt of 66 A.D.
At first the rebels achieved success. The battle against the technical and material supremacy of Rome was, however, hopeless from the very beginning. Jerusalem was conquered in the year 70, and itsTemple was destroyed. The last pocket of resistance was the mountain fortress of Masada. It was conquered in 73 A.D.
Hellenistic Culture in Palestine
(Summary; original © Pauli Huuhtanen and Nils Martola / Kirjapaja 1997.)
By Hellenism is meant the interaction between Greek culture and the cultures of the Near East as a result of the conquests of Alexander the Great.
Palestine was one of the areas settled by people of Greek origin. The newcomers settled in the Phoenician cities of the Mediterranean coast and founded new Greek cities inland, whose administration, economy, legal system and official cult were based on the Greek model.
The Hellenization of Palestine was reinforced by the rule of pro-Greek kings from the 3rd century B.C. onwards and later by the Roman administration. The dynasty of Herod, who had ruled as a Roman vassal, admired Greek culture and adopted Greek manners. The ruling Jewish elite was open to Hellenism.
50 Nicodemus [a member of the Sanhedrin, the ruling Senate of the Jews], who had gone to Jesus earlier and who was one of their own number, asked, 51 “Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing?” 52
Jesus and Nicodemus
They replied, “Are you from Galilee, too? Look into it, and you will find that no prophet comes out of Galilee.”
***
The personality of a man imprints itself on his work. So, just as the Ninth Symphony (by Beethoven) could only have been conceived by a European, or Confucian doctrine by a Chinese, even if everything about the personality of its author were unknown, it is evident that Christianity (or the doctrinal corpus that has been passed on to posterity under this name), in its nature, its soaring nobility and idealism, simply could not have been the work of a Jew.
The great law historian Jherinq says:
“Christianity represents a victory over Judaism, and contains from its first origins an Aryan seed.”(22)
The location of Galilee inbetween Phoenicia and Syria would authorize, in principle, the presumption in favor of an ancestry that is primarily Assyrian, but never Jewish.
Some authors, such as Chamberlain, Harnack, Hugo, and Winckler, among others, were inclined to believe, without the power to affirm it resolutely, that Jesus Christ descended from Greeks who had emigrated to Galilee in the 4th century BC.
The descriptions of His physical appearance are found only in very scarce written documents but in a relatively abundant oral tradition. They present him to us as an Aryan, but nothing can be proved except that he was not Jewish.
His disciples were all Galileans, as He was, with one exception. That exception was Judas Iscariot, meaning Judas of Kerioth, a city of Judea and peopled by the tribe of Judah.
.
Judas Iscariot
JdN: Judas is sometimes depicted with a black halo. Pagan Greek and Roman art had long used golden halos to depict those blessed by the sun god.
We do not know the reason for Judas to betray Jesus, except, of course, greed. Some believe that Judas, like many Jews at this time (and until today as well), expected the Jewish Messiah to be a true earthly king, a warrior and conqueror, to drive the Romans out of Palestine and eventually erect a Jewish empire on the planet where the Jews would “rule the Goyim with a rod of iron.”
Psalm 2 is understood by Jews to prophesy their Messiah:
1 Why do the nations {heathen} rage, and the peoples imagine a vain thing? 2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against Yahweh, and against His anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
4 He Who sitteth in the heavens shall laugh; Yahweh shall have them in derision. 5 Then shall He speak unto them in His wrath, and vex them in His great {sore} displeasure. 6 Yet have I set My King upon My holy hill of Zion. 7 I will declare the decree: Yahweh hath said unto Me, Thou art My Son; this day have Ibegotten Thee. 8 Ask of Me, and I shall give Thee the nations {heathen} for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for Thy possession. 9Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; Thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
10 Be wise now, therefore, O ye kings; be instructed, ye judges of the earth. 11 Serve Yahweh with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 12Kiss the Son, lest He be angry, and ye perish from the way, when His wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they who put their trust in Him.
Jesus, in contrast, says clearly to Pontius Pilate that his kingdom “is not of this world.”
Jesus is depicted as blond and Judas as very Jewish-looking
After betraying Jesus, and getting his bribe of thirty pieces of silver money from the Jews, Judas realized the enormity of his crime and hanged himself in a field he had bought with the money. According to the Gospels, his belly split open and his guts spilled out. Here in the center panel of this triptych painting, the Devil is depicted taking his soul.
***
“The Jewish people fell from the heights because of their faithlessness and condemned their Redeemer to a shameful death. Their godlessness has assumed such forms that, for the salvation of our own people, it becomes necessary to prevent their disease. Besides usury, through which Jews everywhere have sucked dry the property of impoverished Christians,
….they are accomplices of thieves and robbers; and the most damaging aspect of the matter is that they allure the unsuspecting through magical incantations, superstition, and witchcraft to the Synagogue of Satan and boast of being able to predict the future.
We have carefully investigated how this revolting sect abuses the name of Christ and how harmful they are to those whose life is threatened by their deceit.
On account of these and other serious matters, and because of the gravity of their crimes which increase day to day more and more, We order that, within 90 days, all Jews in our entire earthly realm of justice — in all towns, districts, and places — must depart these regions. ~ Pope St. Pius V (From his Bull, “The Jewish Race,” Feb.26, 1569
This respectable number of twenty-nine Popes and fifty-seven anti-Semitic bulls could even be expanded by citing the bull Beatus Andreas issued by Benedictine XIV on February 22, 1755, which refers to the martyrdom of a Christian child, little Andy Oxner, on 12 July 1462, aged 3, by Christ-hating Jews, in a very notorious ritual murder case. The severity of the Pope’s tone could not have been improved on by Dr. Joseph Goebbels.
[JdN: I read the entire bull in German translation. Half-expecting a tirade against the Jews for killing this child, I found instead the legal and formal attitude that Ariel Toaff credited to popes in various ritual murder cases. Popes in effect “bent over backwards” to not condemn Jews unjustly, having in mind the claim of “Saint” Paul that the Jews were “still” in some way God’s Covenant People — but were they ever? The bull implies that because the little child could not and did not consciously choose martyrdom, at least four miracles that were witnessed by others are necessary for official beatification or sanctification of the jew-murdered child, that is, for the Church to formally declare them to be “blessed” or “saints.”)
The church in Rinn near Innsbruck, Austria
A politically correct modern plaque is all that is left now in the church at Judenstein (Jew’s Stone”) recalling little Andreas Oxner, “Anderl [Andy] von [of] Rinn”, who was beatified in 1755.
The painted wooden statue of the three-year-old Andy
The poor boy’s bones were removed from the church in 1985 by a traitorous, jew-serving bishop, ‘Reinhold Stecher. (And, who knows with the Catholic Church of today, perhaps he was even a homosexual and a pedophile. This priest was arrested by the Gestapo as an enemy of the Reich, and almost sent to a concentration camp, but instead was put in the Army and forced to fight for Germany up in Finland and Norway.)
The former ceiling fresco depicting what the Jews did to him, as with the case of Simon of Trent, the Jews did this out of direct hatred and mockery of Jesus and Christians. Under Jew pressure, the Vatican-II Church in 1961 revoked its own beatification from 1755 of little Andy, saying the case was being “misused” to incite antisemitism, there was no proof Jews did it, or if so, none that Jews did it out of religious hatred — all bald-faced lies. Only Jews drain (using up to 100 cuts) all the blood out of white children when they murder them, and it is for the dried blood for matzoh bread eaten at Passover.
A vile Gentile, the godfather actually, took his own godson to the Jews and sold him for money. This fresco, as of 2015, is still to be seen in the church.
Jews are here depicted truthfully as killing and draining the blood from white, Christian children, especially boys, to make a dried blood powder to be baked into the matzoh bread which Jews eat at Passover: BLOOD PASSOVER Ariel Toaff 2007
Most of the bulls and edicts refer to general topics, such as issues of doctrine, procedures, and the situation of Jews in the Papal States, and that of Jews in other Catholic states, and things to be regulated by decrees and papal ordinances.
In the years before the triumph of the Italian revolution [and the national unification of Italy] of 1859, and with it the subsequent disappearance of the Papal States, the regulations concerning the Jews of Rome were very strict, with occasional relaxations of their severity. The common character of all the measures taken was to protect Christian communities against the penetration of the Jewish race and its Talmudic ideas. These measures can be grouped into four categories:
1) Direct measures to protect the Catholic faith:
1.1) Destruction of the Talmud.
1.2) Severe prohibition of the teaching of the Talmud and even of the Bible [by Jews] without prior permission and supervision.
2) Measures aimed at ensuring the social separation of Jews and Christians:
2.1) Confinement of Jews to their ghetto.
Venice ghetto (Ghettoes had a literal wall around them, or in the case of Venice, a canal of water traversed by a footbridge, with Gentile soldiers or policemen standing guard and perhaps interrogating unknown people who were coming and going. Jews had to be back in their ghetto by the curfew.)
Jewish ghetto, Cracow, Poland
2.2) General prohibition – laid on both Jews and Christians – of cohabitation, in the broadest application of the expression.
2.3) Use of dresses and special badges.
2.4) Absolute expulsion from certain areas
.
3) Measures assuring the protection of certain professions, preserving them from Jewish influence:
3.1) Public charges.
3.2) Liberal professions, especially medicine.
3.3) Teaching.
3.4) Banking.
3.5) Certain types of trade.
3.6) Ownership of the land.
4) Measures concerning race:
4.1) Prohibition of employment by Jews, of nannies, maids, cooks, and in general, all kinds of non-Jewish female workers.
The ritual murder in Hungary of the 14-year-old farm girl Esther Solymosi on 1 April 1882, painted by Michael Munkácsy under commission by Tsar Alexander III of Russia
4.2) Prohibition of mixed marriages (a universal principle already in Christianity)
The encyclical letter of His Holiness Benedict XIV (photo; reigned 1740-58) sent to the Primate, archbishops and bishops of the country of Poland concerning the prohibitions against Jews residing in the same cities and districts as Polish Christians is a document that, in our age, would have cost the author, howevermuch Vicar of Christ he was, the honor of the gallows in any ecclesiastic Nuremberg.
His Holiness begins by recalling the Catholic traditions of the Polish nation and emphasizing the resolutions of the Petrikac (Petrikov) Council, presided over by nuncio Lipomanus, bishop of Verona … In said council and for the greater glory of God the principle of freedom of conscience was proscribed and definitely excluded from among the principles, governing the public life of the kingdom.
Remember, then, the Vicar of Christ wrote, the resolutions of the synod of the province of Gnesen, in which the Polish bishops took wise measures to preserve their king from Jewish perfidy.
His Holiness then expresses regret over the catastrophic news that has come to his knowledge. Here is the catastrophic news: “The number of Jews has increased considerably; the Jews have constituted monopolies, specifically in the
liquor trade; they have become owners of immense estates; and they have taken their daring to the point of becoming tax collectors. ”
He then calls attention to the fact that some Christians have entered the domestic service of Jews, which he calls a monstrous anomaly.
After asking that no reaction include committing abuses and exactions against the Jews, His Holiness demands a return to the healthy order of things and the complete separation (apartheid, we would say today) between both communities, Jewish and Christian, with the predominance of the latter in civil life.
Even without a moment’s consideration of its divine aspect, an organization like the Roman Catholic Church, nearly two thousand years old, does not make major decisions lightly and without thinking through carefully the pros and cons. It would seriously insult the intellect and the sensitivity of twenty-nine Pontiffs, and of hundreds of archbishops, cardinals, bishops — many of them at the altars [ = not shut up in monasteries but out in the real world with the toiling masses, the faithful, the people] — who dictated anti-Semitic measures. It seems logical to suppose that if they took such measures, they had powerful motives.
In the last two hundred years Judaism has created two monsters, capitalism and communism, has perpetrated the Russian Revolution [ = a putsch by 40,000 mostly Jewish bolsheviks], the plundering of Palestine, and has contributed powerfully to the unleashing of two world wars, among many other “achievements” with which they can be charged.
We are convinced of the existence of many decent Jews, innocent of the crimes that Judaism has committed and still now commits, although we will state that we have not found a Jew – not a single one! – who has dissociated himself from his kinsmen in the [Soviet-era] Kremlin, on Wall Street … or in Palestine.
We do not see, then, any special reason to believe that the antisemitic measures of the Church, which must have been a good thing for eighteen centuries, suddenly became a bad thing despite the emergence of [new Jewish menaces]:
–communism,
–capitalism, and
–the pirate state of Tel Aviv.
.
.
…..Reaction of a reader
I have always felt the same about Jesus. But how do you explain the genealogies of Jesus which kick off two of the Gospels, claiming that His ancestry went back to the legendary King David, given your perspective of Jesus-the-Gentile?
I replied:
The one by Matthew, chapter 1, runs from Abraham down to Joseph, which is genetically irrelevant because Joseph was only Jesus’ stepfather.
The New Testament clearly proclaims as its principal dogma that God Himself was Jesus’ “biological” and real father.
*** Matthew 1:1-24
1 This is the genealogy[a] of Jesus the Messiah[b] the son of David, the son of Abraham:
2 Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob, Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,
3 Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar, Perez the father of Hezron, Hezron the father of Ram,
4 Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon,
5 Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, Obed the father of Jesse,
6 and Jesse the father of King David.
David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife,
7 Solomon the father of Rehoboam, Rehoboam the father of Abijah, Abijah the father of Asa,
8 Asa the father of Jehoshaphat, Jehoshaphat the father of Jehoram, Jehoram the father of Uzziah,
9 Uzziah the father of Jotham, Jotham the father of Ahaz, Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,
10 Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, Manasseh the father of Amon, Amon the father of Josiah,
11 and Josiah the father of Jeconiah[c] and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.
12 After the exile to Babylon:
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel, Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel,
13 Zerubbabel the father of Abihud, Abihud the father of Eliakim, Eliakim the father of Azor,
14 Azor the father of Zadok, Zadok the father of Akim, Akim the father of Elihud,
15 Elihud the father of Eleazar, Eleazar the father of Matthan, Matthan the father of Jacob,
16 and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, and Mary was the mother of Jesus who is called the Messiah.
17 Thus there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Messiah. [JdN: cute….]
Joseph Accepts Jesus as His Son
18 This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about[d]: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit.19 Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet[e] did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.
20 But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said,
“Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21 She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name ‘Jesus,’ because he will save his people from their sins.”
[“Jesus” (a Greek version of His name) means in Hebrew “Yehoshu,” that is, “Yahweh Saves.” Talmudic Jews call Him “Yeshu”.]
Yeshu is depicted as a whining monkey, and is mocked and crucified by a Jewish girl in a bikini in a 2006 Israel tv comedy: .https://johndenugent.com/images/Israeli-comedy-mocks-crucifies-Jesus-monkey.mp4
22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 23 “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel”[g] (which means “God with us”).
24 When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. 25 But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name ‘Jesus.'”
***
The genealogy in Luke 3:21-29 also deals with Joseph (who, again, is NOT the biological father), but actually seems to refer to the ancestors of Mary. (See below the text in Luke.)
The genealogical line running from David to Joseph in Luke is actually very different from that in Matthew!
This is a really murky and dubious story, and one of many pious legends in the Bible.
(It reminds me of the “Greatest Generation” nonsense that today glorifies the generation of gullible sheep who, incredibly, four times elected an arch-criminal, liar and failure, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, to the US presidency and how FDR’s soldier-saints then “saved the world for freedom and stopped the Nazis.” It is really a national ego trip about how great grandpa was — and by extension his grandchildren…. so very “proud to be an American, because at least I know I’m free” — free to watch different television channels, to choose between French-vanilla and regular-vanilla ice cream, or select which disgraceful political puppet of Jewry will get their meaningless vote.)
As Wikipedia accurately states (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus):
The New Testament provides two accounts of the genealogy of Jesus, one in the Gospel of Matthew and another in the Gospel of Luke. Matthew’s starts with Abraham, while Luke begins with Adam. The lists are identical between Abraham and David, but differ radically from that point. Traditional Christian scholars (starting with the historian Eusebius[1]) have put forward various theories that seek to explain why the lineages are so different,[2] such as that Matthew’s account follows the lineage of Joseph, while Luke’s follows the lineage of Mary. Some modern critical scholars like Marcus Borg and John Dominic Crossan claim both genealogies as inventions, to bring the Messianic claims into conformity with Jewish criteria.[3]
[….] Modern scholarship tends to see the genealogies of Jesus as theological constructs [ =pious lies] rather than factual history:
family pedigrees would not usually have been available for non-priestly families, [ = only priests knew their real ancestry, not average people claiming they descended from King David]
and the contradictions between the two lists are seen as clear evidence that these were not based on genealogical records.
Additionally, the use of titles such as ‘Son of God’ and ‘Son of David’ are seen as evidence that they do not come from the earliest Gospel traditions.[27] Raymond E. Brown says the genealogies “tell us nothing certain about his grandparents or his great-grand-parents”.[28]
Gundry suggests the series of unknown names in Matthew connecting Joseph’s grandfather to Zerubbabel as an outright fabrication, produced by collecting and then modifying various names from 1 Chronicles.[29] Sivertsen sees Luke’s as artificially pieced together out of oral traditions.
The pre-exilic series Levi, Simeon, Judah, Joseph consists of the names of tribal patriarchs, far more common after the Exile [to Babylon] than before, while the name Mattathias and its variants begin at least three suspiciously similar segments.[30] Kuhn likewise suggests that the two series Jesus–Mattathias (77–63) and Jesus–Mattatha (49–37) are duplicates.[31]
The contradictions between the lists have been used to question the accuracy of the Gospel accounts since ancient times,[32] and several early Christian authors responded to this. Augustine, for example, attempted on several occasions to refute every criticism, not only because the Manichaeans in his day were using the differences to attack Christianity,[33] but also because he himself [Augustine!] had seen them in his youth as cause for doubting the veracity of the Gospels.[34]
[…] Three consecutive kings of Judah are omitted [from Matthew]: Ahaziah, Jehoash, and Amaziah. These three kings are seen as especially wicked, from the cursed line of Ahab through his daughter Athaliah to the third and fourth generation.[7] The author could [also] have omitted them to create a second set of fourteen.[8]
*** Luke 3:21-29
21 When all the people were being baptized, Jesus was baptized too. And as he was praying, heaven was opened 22 and the Holy Spirit descended on him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven: “You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.”
23 Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph,
the son of Heli,
24 the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melki, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph,
25 the son of Mattathias, the son of Amos, the son of Nahum, the son of Esli, the son of Naggai,
26 the son of Maath, the son of Mattathias, the son of Semein, the son of Josek, the son of Joda,
27 the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, the son of Neri,
28 the son of Melki, the son of Addi, the son of Cosam, the son of Elmadam, the son of Er,
29 the son of Joshua, the son of Eliezer, the son of Jorim, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi,
30 the son of Simeon, the son of Judah, the son of Joseph, the son of Jonam, the son of Eliakim,
31 the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David,
32 the son of Jesse, the son of Obed, the son of Boaz, the son of Salmon,[d] the son of Nahshon,
33 the son of Amminadab, the son of Ram,[e] the son of Hezron, the son of Perez, the son of Judah,
34 the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham, the son of Terah, the son of Nahor,
35 the son of Serug, the son of Reu, the son of Peleg, the son of Eber, the son of Shelah,
36 the son of Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem, the son of Noah, the son of Lamech,
37 the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch, the son of Jared, the son of Mahalalel, the son of Kenan,
38 the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.
***
One can question how much of the Old Testament is historically true, or the stories about King David. Even many Israeli historians concede that most of the stories are myths. Many historians think that Jerusalem under David – if he ever existed — was a village of a thousand residents. This photo shows the foundations of his supposed “royal palace.” http://www.newsweek.com/bible-david-solomon-timna-copper-mines-archaeology-717192
Compare these primitive rock walls with the magnificent architecture of Egypt or Babylon at the same time!
The Great Library of Babylon. (When the Jews were exiled in 740 BC to this great capital full of Gentiles, very few of them returned in 539 BC to their original Palestine, once the Persian king Cyrus the Great had conquered Babylonia and released them.)
So who really knows if David was real or who his descendants were?
RationalWiki says (https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/King_David):
King David was the second king of Israel and Judah, and most famous for killing Goliath, although he wasn’t king when he did that. David was a bit of a jerk, paying for one of his wives in Philistine foreskins,[1] sending some dude [Uriah] to be killed so he could bang his wife, and the most heinous of crimes: conducting a census at the behest of Satan.[2] Or maybe not.[3]
Jesus is supposedly descended from David, though there is the problem of being the “Son of God” as it is Joseph who was the descendant of David, and if He were conceived immaculately, then he wasn’t the son of Joseph and therefore he WASN’T a descendant of David.
Was [David] real?
The source for everything we know about David is the Bible. There are a few possible extra-biblical sources, such as the Tel Dan Stele. This Aramean victory stele contains the phrase ביתדוד which translates to “House of the beloved”, “House of the uncle” or “House of David”. [4] As the stele describes a victory over Israel and an unspecified allied kingdom it isn’t unreasonable to suppose they refer to Judah and its David. However, the “city of David” section of Jerusalem lacks convincing evidence of being any kind of “city” in circa 1000 BCE, though the ruins are difficult to date accurately. [5]
Most scholars hold the position that the Histories (Nevi’im) describe real people, in a fictionalized account. Therefore, it’s likely King David existed, and he was for Judah their most powerful or important king. But since no one else mentions him, he probably was not a major player in the greater Middle East region of the time. [6]
References
- He was only required to bring 100 foreskins, but he gathered 200, because you can never have enough foreskins. The whole thing was a plot by Saul to kill David, though, so he gets a pass here
- ↑ 1 Chronicles 21:1
- ↑ 2 Samuel 24:1
- ↑ Mykytiuk, Lawrence J. (2004). “Identifying Biblical Persons in Northwest Semitic Inscriptions of 1200-539 B.C.E.” Atlanta, Ga.: Society of Biblical Literature. See pp. 110-132 and 265-277
- ↑ “Solomon’s Jerusalem: The Text and the Facts on the Ground,” in: A.G. Vaughn and A.E. Killebrew (eds.), Jerusalem in Bible and Archaeology: The First Temple Period, (Society of Biblical Literature, Symposium Series, No. 18), Atlanta, 2003, pp. 103-115. See also Cahill, J., “David’s Jerusalem, Fiction or Reality? The Archaeological Evidence Proves It,” and Steiner, M., “David’s Jerusalem, Fiction or Reality? It’s Not There: Archeology Proves a Negative,” both in Biblical Archeology Review 24 (July/August 1998).
- ↑ Archeology Magazine
.
***JdN — final comment
With every truly major ruler, 1) other kings mention them in correspondence or show them in war statuary (if they beat them or take some of their soldiers prisoner), and 2) we also find coins, inscriptions or statues with their likeness on them.
With King David or his son, King Solomon — there is nothing, zip, nada, nichts.
These two Jewish kings may be just as real as the Jews’ Holocaust, or their glorifications of the great Jews geniuses Sigmund Freud and Albert Einstein — 95% of it is just Jewish fake news.
And it is the same with Jesus. As a Galilean, he may have been 5% Jewish, or maybe not Jewish at all in His DNA.
(Many of us have a smidgen of Jewish blood in us because for thousands of years young Jews, disgusted with Judaism’s lies, greed and hatred, have left Judaism, married Gentiles, and joyfully become part of the Gentile world. Were Jewry not a path to greater wealth and power, very may Jews would turn their back on this horrific faith.)
What really counts, as we saw also with Adolf Hitler, who was striking but neither ugly nor handsome,
is not how the man appeared, but what he preached to the world and did.
Both denounced Judaism and the Jews, and proclaimed that a new world must come that is free of ego, hate, lies, and greed — either that, or humanity will destroy itself.
.
“The Galileans value honor more than money;
the Jews money more than honor. “
I agree with most of what Dr. Lasha Darkmoon wrote here in defense of all that is good in Christianity: https://www.darkmoon.me/2018/the-plot-against-christ/
If the Jews invented Christianity as a cunning ploy to weaken Christians and turn them into natural-born slaves, which is what the Christ-bashing conspiracy theorists maintain, then you need to explain why the Jews have spent so much of their time and energy, ever since the foundation of Christianity, trying to destroy the very thing they should never have created in the first place. Why create a Frankenstein monster in Palestine 2000 years ago [.…] in order to spend the next 2,000 years trying to destroy it?
I have to heartily concur after reading (actually twice) this superb book in French, Jewish Antichristianism, by Martin Peltier. The Jews hated Jesus and His religion from Day One, from the get-go, and for 2,000 years straight have led or funded every single movement against Christianity, debunking, persecuting undermining, weakening and dividing it.
But saying that does not mean I approve of all the established “Christian” dogmas as laid down 300 years later by various church councils under the supervision of brutal Roman and/or Byzantine emperors.
After 1) the peril emanating from the US Federal Reserve (which means Jewish control of our money) and then 2) the Jewish control of the media, the third-most dangerous thing on earth in my eyes is the notion that “Jesus-was-a-Jew” and the suicidally pro-Jewish, pro-Yahweh, pro-Old Testament affections for Israel and Jewry of many white Christians.
Christian-Zionist pastor John Hagee
The most pernicious garbage is what was propounded by “Saint” Paul (the Sanhedrin agent Saul) in the Book of Romans about how the Jews were “still” God’s Chosen People (as if they ever were!)
But Jesus, the real Christian authority, said the Jews were becoming SATAN’s people (John 8:44) and that God would reject the Jews if they rejected and killed His Son!
Matthew 21:33-46
The Parable of the Tenants
33 “Listen to another parable: There was a landowner who planted a vineyard. He put a wall around it, dug a winepress in it and built a watchtower. Then he rented the vineyard to some farmers and moved to another place. 34 When the harvest time approached, he sent his servants to the tenants to collect his fruit.
35 “The tenants seized his servants; they beat one, killed another, and stoned a third. 36 Then he sent other servants to them, more than the first time, and the tenants treated them the same way. 37 Last of all, he sent his son to them. ‘They will respect my son,’ he said.
38 “But when the tenants saw the son, they said to each other, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him and take his inheritance.’ 39 So they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.
40 “Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?”
41 “He will bring those wretches to a wretched end,” they replied, “and he will rent the vineyard to other tenants, who will give him his share of the crop at harvest time.”
42 Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures:
“‘The stone the builders rejected
has become the cornerstone;
the Lord has done this,
and it is marvelous in our eyes’[a]?
43 “Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit.
44 Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; anyone on whom it falls will be crushed.”[b]
45 When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard Jesus’ parables, they knew he was talking about them. 46 They looked for a way to arrest him, but they were afraid of the crowd because the people held that he was a prophet.
***
But Paul, who elbows his way into Christianity and pushes aside the apostles who actually knew the man, contradicts “this Jesus guy” (“what does He know anyway?”) in his letter to the Romans, chapter 11
1I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. […]
25I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in, 26and in this waye
all Israel will be saved.
As it is written:
“The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27And this isf my covenant with them
when I take away their sins.”g
28As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable.
[Well, shucks, folks, this is sort- of the exact opposite of what Jesus said!
This is just Sanhedrin undercover agent Saul/Paul desperately peddling to Christians, who have every reason to hate the Jews for 1) murdering Christ and 2) attacking them as well, “Now, now, don’t become antisemitic! We Jews are STILL the Chosen People, goyim!“]
30Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may nowh receive mercy as a result of God’s mercy to you.
[This is the ultimate in corkscrew b-s logic. So God made the Jews be wicked…. so He could show mercy to Gentiles?
Umm, how about instead God just being merciful to the Gentiles anyway, regardless of what the Jews choose to do?
32For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.
[Hunh? This reminds me of what one Church Father said: “Credo quia absurdum” = “I believe because it is absurd.”
And look — the entire premise that God ever loved or chose the horrible Jews anyway is a vast, bogus, absurd, megalomaniac false premise, a Jew ego trip and fantasy!
The Jews, originally called “the Hebrews,” descend not from some God-fearing old patriarch, but from a roaming horde of robbers, thieves, prostitutes, fences, mercenaries and hitmen called “the Habiru”!
And since when is a man agreeing to human-sacrifice his own son, as Abraham was willing to do to get Yahweh’s blessing, somehow not a twisted, depraved and criminal mindset, and one which only a demon god would request and reward?
Jewish scholar Ariel Toaff was right — the first Hebrew, Abraham himself, was already willing to commit ritual murder! OF HIS OWN SON!
The Hebrews of the Bible (called Habirus by the Ancient Egyptians and Hittites) were roaming criminal hordes of semitic neo-neanderthals, who for their criminal traits were selected by the demonic alien Yahweh to be “his people” and rule the world — if they obeyed his plan. When Abraham agreed to human-sacrifice his own son Isaac to get the rewards Yahweh promised, that proved he had the “right stuff.”
https://johndenugent.com/english/the-original-jewshebrews-were-roaming-hordes-of-feared-criminals-whores-fences-and-killers-called-habiru-the-folly-of-exiling-not-killing-ancient-criminals/
I will be addressing all this soon in my audio and online book using the chapbook by Dietrich Eckart and Adolf Hitler, who in 1923 worked up a fascinating discussion into “Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin.”
Anyway, I did some more research into how Jesus and others were depicted in the catacombs in Rome. Let us recall over and over and over that a number of the founders of the church in Rome had actually KNOWN Jesus in Palestine (Galilee, Samaria and Judea), including and especially Peter himself. (Peter was crucified in Rome at the behest of the Jews under Emperor Nero, whose wife Poppea was a strong judeophile.)
This is how the early Christians remembered Paul, who was also in Rome, as very jewy. 😉
This is how they saw Jesus and Mary:
Close-up of the boy Jesus
Traversing the sky in a chariot, Jesus, the blond risen Lord, has sunbeams emerging from his head
Close-up of “the Lord”
.
.
.
Albert Réville (Jésus de Nazareth, 1923):
The dogma of redemption by the suffering and death of Christ is the mythical representation of the fact, which is proved by experience and illustrated by the greatest martyrs, that the progress and freedom of humanity are attained at the cost of acute suffering that is undergone by all benefactors. . . .
The dogma of original sin sums up in the persons of the first ancestors of our race, persons who are more mythical than real, what happens over and over again each time that a man is born into the world.
…..Jesus introduced addressing God as “Our Father”
Jesus was the son of God, not the son of a Jew. The two major historians Heinrich Grätz and Robertson Smith agree that, in addition to Assyrians and Greeks, tribes of Scythian shepherds settled there (an Iranian or even proto-Slavic tribe).
Luke 2:52 And Jesus advanced in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and men.
John 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world:
John 19:12 However, the Jewish leaders cried out, saying, “If you release this man, you aren’t a friend of the emperor! Anyone who makes himself out to be a king opposes the emperor!”
Adolf Hitler is one of the most famous persons who ever lived. And if the human race avoids a third and final world war, an all-out war between Russia and America, and if it survives at all on this planet, then Hitler likely will be remembered for centuries or millennia to come alongside such figures as Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan and Napoleon as a powerful, charismatic leader and conqueror who changed human history.
Few know that Alexander the Great actually had a tutor when he was young, the great Greek philosopher Aristotle.
As Wikipedia correctly states:
Along with Plato, Aristotle is considered the “Father of Western Philosophy”, which from his teachings inherited almost its entire lexicon, including problems and methods of inquiry, so influencing almost any form of knowledge known to the modern world. His writings cover many subjects “ including physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, poetry, theater, music, rhetoric, psychology, linguistics, politics and government “ and constitute the first comprehensive system of Western philosophy. Shortly after [his teacher] Plato died, Aristotle left Athens and, at the request of [King] Philip II of Macedon, tutored [his son], Alexander the Great, beginning in 343 BC. Aristotle was appointed as the head of the royal academy of Macedon.
During that time he gave lessons not only to Alexander, but also to two other future kings: Ptolemy and Cassander.
Aristotle encouraged Alexander toward eastern conquest and his attitude towards Persia was unabashedly ethnocentric. In one famous example, he counsels Alexander to be “a leader to the Greeks and a despot to the barbarians, to look after the former as after friends and relatives, and to deal with the latter as with beasts or plants”.
We all know that Alexander did go on to defeat and destroy the gigantic Persian Empire which had repeatedly invaded Greece, and create a new empire which spread the Greek language and culture to many countries.
Well, when he was a youngish adult, from age 30 to 33, Adolf Hitler also had a tutor, but also a caring mentor, and a very close friend whose advice he followed.
That friend’s name was Dietrich Eckart.
It is clear to me that Dietrich Eckart ” an artist who realized the necessity of a new leader, a new genius, entering German politics in order to obtain power ” was the decisive influence on the young former soldier Adolf Hitler.
He transformed him from the introvert he had been, a quiet poet, thinker, reader and painter before World War One, into the dynamic and spectacular politician of the masses which he became, into a fascinating orator, into the creator of such pageantry as the Nuremberg Rallies, into the designer of magnificent Wehrmacht and SS military uniforms, and finally into the head of state of a major power, the German Reich, which rose to became a conquering world superpower, and it took the whole Jewish-controlled world six years of total war to defeat one country.
It was Dietrich Eckart who enriched Hitler’s understanding both of the higher spiritual realities, and got him to also believe in himself and in his destiny. And based on his vast experience in the theater world, Eckart showed Hitler how to fascinate the masses and make them love and follow him.
In terms of world history, Dietrich Eckart deserves the fullest credit for transforming Adolf Hitler from a quiet, shy watercolor painter, avid reader, and amateur poet into the great Führer and world leader that he later became. Of course, these abilities already were slumbering in Hitler, but as so often, it is the right mentor who brings them out, and his praise, advice and encouragement of Hitler made him a star.
Dietrich Eckart, born 23 March 1868, died 26 December 1923 was a German journalist, playwright, poet, and politician who was one of the founders of the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (German Workers’ Party – DAP), which under Hitler evolved into the National Socialist German Workers Party, the NSDAP. Eckart was a key influence on Adolf Hitler in the early years of the NS Party and was a participant in the 1923 Beer Hall Putsch.
He died shortly after the betrayed and failed putsch, and was honored during the Third Reich, which began nine years after his death, as a major thinker and writer.
In 1912 the playwright Eckart adapted the famous Norwegian play “Peer Gynt” for the German stage. It is a five-act play in verse by the Norwegian dramatist Henrik Ibsen, first published in 1867. Eckart translated and dramatized the play for the German audience. It became in his hands “a powerful dramatisation of nationalist and anti-semitic ideas”, in which Gynt represents the superior Germanic hero, struggling against implicitly Jewish “trolls”.
Ralph M. Engelman, a Jewish professor who wrote a 1979 book on Eckart, said, “Eckart meant his adaptation of ‘Peer Gynt’ to represent a racial allegory in which the trolls and the Great Boyg, [NN: a giant, slimy serpent in Norwegan folklore, a hindrance to travellers, whose name means ‘bent’, ‘twisted’ or ‘curved’] [thbese trolls and the Great Boyg] represented what [Otto] Weininger [who was a Jew who turned radically against Judaism as a young man, and, despairing, committed suicide] conceived to be the Jewish spirit.”[37]
Eckart’s version was one of the best attended productions of the age with more than 600 performances in Berlin alone.
Eckart later helped to found the National Socialist party.
This success –a run of 600 performances was enormous — not only made Eckart wealthy, it gave him the social contacts that he later used to introduce Hitler to dozens of important German citizens. These introductions proved to be pivotal in Hitler’s ultimate rise to power. Later on, Eckart developed an ideology of a “genius superman.” He also became fascinated by the Buddhist doctrine of Maya (illusion).
Maya is everything that makes the real appear unreal and the unreal appear real. Maya is that which obscures, confuses and distracts an individual.
The 1923 booklet Bolshevism from Moses to Leninwas listed as the TOP item on a list of major national-socialist writings at the back of a 1928 book by Alfred Rosenberg on Eckart. Rosenberg’s book was called:
…which means, in German, “Dietrich Eckart: a Legacy.”
“Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin” was published by the official NSDAP publishing house, the Franz Eher Verlag, which was run by Max Amann, the former platoon sergeant of corporal Adolf Hitler when they both served at the front in WWI in the Bavarian Army. It is a brilliant first exposition by Adolf Hitler in writing of the Jewish problem. Known only as a great speaker, organizer and leader, Hitler now became a writer at age 34 years old, and did so in the closest collaboration with his mentor and very close friend, Dietrich Eckart, who was then 56, and thus twenty-two years his senior.
Significantly, Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin laid out just how positively the two men saw Jesus, and how negatively they regarded the religion of Judaism which Jesus was seeking to radically reform. Both detested the Old Testament, the Jewish people, and their tribal god called Yahweh. They therefore also opposed the massive influence on early Christianity of the so-called Apostle Paul, a self-appointed apostle who had never known Jesus when He was alive. Saul or Paul was actually an activist with the ruling body of Jewry, called the Sanhedrin, and a key persecutor of the Christians.
With regard to Yahweh, Hitler and Eckart believed the same as the British writer Arnold Lees (on page 32 of his The Great Jewish Masque: Jewish-Masque-Arnold Lees):
“The god of the Jews has never been the father of all men, an ideal of love, justice, mercy, compassion, etc., but, on the contrary, the god of the Jews has always been a god of vengeance down to the tenth generation, just and merciful only to the Jews, and a foe to all other peoples; denying the latter human rights and commanding their subjection to the Jews, so that the Jews may appropriate their possessions and rule over them, exterminating all those who object to this arrangement.”
As for the so-called Apostle Paul, Adolf Hitler and Dietrich Eckart considered Saul or Paul to be a Jewish agent, someone who, in their view, had transformed and twisted the teachings of Jesus into something completely different and, in fact, dangerously pro-Jewish.
In the end, in the view of Hitler and Eckart, the new religion of Jesus, who was murdered by the Jews, became a religion that told Gentiles that the Jews. were God’s chosen people, and their savior was a Jew. As John 4: 22 claims, “Salvation is from the Jews.”
The writer and playwright Dietrich Eckart was very influenced by the great French aristocratic writer, Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux, who lived from 1805 to 1876. Gougenot believed that the Jews, this extraordinary people who have no rivals on this planet in terms of devious cunning, hatred, and the desire to enslave or genocide the world, actually and literally are the product of ” yes ” evil beings coming down to this earth and mating thousands of years ago with earthly women, producing then a hybrid people that is half-demonic, half-human.
This idea harkens back to the idea in the Book of Genesis, the first book of the Old Testament, about the so-called nephilim, and also to the later Book of Enoch, a holy book revered by many but which the Talmud violently denounces.
In Genesis, the first book of the Old Testament, chapter 6, it says of the world before the Flood of Noah:
6 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.3 Then Yahweh said, “My Spirit will not contend with[a] humans forever, for they are mortal; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”
4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days ”and also afterward ”when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
In the Book of Enoch, the watchers (Aramaic עִירִין, iyrin) are angels dispatched to Earth to watch over the humans. They become fallen angels, lusting after human women and, at the prodding of their leader Samyaza, they defect en masse to illicitly teach various technologies to humans and procreate among them. The offspring of these unions are the Nephilim, savage giants who pillage the earth and endanger humanity. Samyaza and his associates also taught their relatively primitive human charges various arts and technologies such as weaponry, cosmetics, sorcery, and other techniques that would otherwise have been discovered gradually by humans themselves, and should not have been foisted upon them all at once.
So you can see that the theme of humans being morally unready to handle advanced technologies carefully, and instead putting technology to harmful and lethal uses, such as, today of course, nuclear weapons, health-destroying or addictive drugs, and pollutants that ruin the environment, etc., this concern that earth humans are not ready for, and will always misuse technology to kill each other is a very old concern.
So these are then two different influential ancient books which state that certain angels became rebellious demons and then mated with human women, producing offspring.
Returning to the mysterious phrase in Genesis, chapter 6, about the Nephilim being alive in the days before the Flood, it says, quote, “and also afterward,” implying that this problem of half-demonic humans perhaps occurred again — with half-demonic beings being procreated also after the Flood. Certainly it is true that the Flood of Noah’s time did not end human wickedness, but it began anew.
It was the interpretation of Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux, who exerted via his books a powerful influence on Dietrich Eckart, who then exerted his influence in turn on the young Adolf Hitler, that the Jews, as a people or breeding population, as a gene pool linked by DNA to each other, were and are literally a product of demonic beings who, both before and after the Flood mated with human women.
In this context, we must recall what Jesus said famously in the Gospel of John, chapter 8, to the leaders of Judaism. Then, after the book of Genesis, chapter 6, and the Book of Enoch, his extremely harsh condemnation of the Jews may not seem so hyperbolic, but rather as being a blunt, angry but accurate identification of Jewry by Jesus.
Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me.
Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say.
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
In stark contrast to this negative attitude toward the Jews, and their tribal god Yahweh and their books which together are called the Old Testament, we see in Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin that both Hitler and Eckhart were pro-Jesus. They show sincere reverence, both in this booklet and elsewhere, especially in many, many speeches given by Adolf Hitler and to thousands of people, for the person who was Jesus and His values, as Hitler and Eckart understood them.
In fact, the Jewish writer Timothy Ryback went through Hitler’s private library of 6,000 books, once kept either in Berlin at the Reich Chancellery, or down in Bavaria, at his Alpine home, the Berghof, outside Berchtesgaden. What Ryback found (besides books gifted to Hitler which he never opened, being a busy man who was running a country first the Great Depression and then during the ear) was numerous books about the life and teachings of Jesus. These books were full of Hitler’s underlinings, comments, circled items, and exclamation points about something Jesus said or did, sometimes using three exclamation points in thick black ink!
These books are now kept at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, to which I have a strong family connection.
Or they are found in the Library of Congress in Washington, DC, where I was literally neighbors with the curator himself of the Hitler library collection, an educated African-American with a Cajun French name who spoke in excellent French with me. This was one of the any strange “coincidences” in my life….
Here is a long and important quote now from the Atlantic magazine article of May 2003 by Timonthy Ryback, which,with him being Jewish, is slanted and very negative, of course, but contains many interesitng facts:
***
I also found, however, a Hitler I had not anticipated: a man with a sustained interest in spirituality.
Among the piles of Nazi tripe (much of it printed on high-acid paper that is rapidly deteriorating) are more than 130 books on religious and spiritual subjects, ranging from Occidental occultism to Eastern mysticism to the teachings of Jesus Christ ”books with titles such as Sunday Meditations;
On Prayer; A Primer for Religious Questions, Large and Small;
Large Truths About Mankind, the World and God.
Also included were a German translation of E. Stanley Jones’s 1931 best seller, The Christ of the Mount; and a 500-page work on the life and teachings of Jesus, published in 1935 under the title The Son: The Evangelical Sources and Pronouncements of Jesus of Nazareth in Their Original Form and With the Jewish Influences.
Some volumes date from the early 1920s, when Hitler was an obscure rabble-rouser on the fringe of Munich political life; others from his last years, when he dominated Europe.
One leather-bound tome ”with WORTE CHRISTI, or “Words of Christ,” embossed in gold on the cover ”was well worn, the silky, supple leather peeling upward in gentle curls along the edges. Human hands had obviously spent a lot of time with this book..The inside cover bore a dedication: “To our beloved Führer with gratitude and profound respect, Clara von Behl, born von Jansen von den Osten. Christmas 1935.”Worte Christi was so fragile that when the attendant brought it to me, he placed it on a red-velvet pad in a wooden reading stand, a beautifully finished oak contraption with two supports that could be adjusted with small brass pegs to fit the dimensions of the book. No more than a foot wide and eighteen inches long, the stand had a sacred air, as if it belonged on an altar.I reviewed the table of contents ””Belief and Prayer,” “God and the Kingdom of God,” “Priests and Their Religious Practices,” “The World and Its People” ”and skimmed the introduction; then I scanned the book for marginalia that might suggest a close study of the text. A white-silk bookmark, preserved in its original perfection between pages 22 and 23 (only the portion exposed to the air had deteriorated), lay across a description of the Last Supper as related by Saint John. A series of pages that followed contained only a single aphorism each: “Believe in God” (page 31), “Have no fear, just believe” (page 52), “If you believe, anything is possible” (page 53), and so on, all the way to page 95, which offers the solemn wisdom “Many are called but few are chosen.” On page 241 appears the passage “You should love God, your Lord, with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your spirit: this is the foremost and greatest commandment. Another is equally important: Love your neighbor as you would love yourself.”Beside this passage is one brief penciled line, the only mark in the entire book.
Given Hitler’s legendary disdain for organized religion in general and Christianity in particular, I didn’t expect him to have devoted much time to the teachings of Christ, let alone to have marked this quintessential Christian virtue.
Had this in fact been made by the pencil of Hitler’s younger sister, Paula, who occasionally visited her brother at the Berghof and remained a devout Catholic until her dying day? Might some other Berghof guest have responded to this holy Scripture?
Possibly ”but though most of the spiritually oriented books in the Hitler Library were gifts sent to the Führer by distant admirers, several, like Worte Christi, were obviously well read, and some contained marginalia in Hitler’s hand that suggested a serious exploration of spiritual matters.
[…]
Fritz Redlich, an eminent Yale psychiatrist [and a Jew], asserts in his book, Hitler: Diagnosis of a Destructive Prophet, that Hitler acted from a profound belief in God. . Noting Hitler’s own words “Man kommt um den Gottesbegriff nicht herum” (“You cannot get around the concept of God”), Redlich told me last summer that he was certain Hitler believed in a “divine creature.” . He rejected suggestions that Hitler’s invocations of the divine were little more than cynical public posturing and insisted that we ought to take Hitler at his word: [Narrator’s note; now comes a lie by this Jew, from the people whom Hitler called “the great masters of the lie,” claiming of course that Hitler was a liar.] “In a way, Hitler was a terrible liar, but he was a tactical liar. In his essential line of thinking he was honest.” . Traudl Junge, Hitler’s former secretary, would not go so far as to say that Hitler believed in God, but she did believe that Hitler’s repeated references to the divine were more than just for show. Junge ”who died of cancer in February of last year ”told me the previous summer that Hitler spoke of such things in private as well as in public..After two and a half years of daily contact with Hitler, she was convinced that he believed in some form of divine protection, especially after surviving a dramatic assassination attempt in 1944. “After the July 1944 attack,” she told me, “I believe he felt himself to be an instrument of Providence, and believed he had a mission to fulfill.”[And, near the end of the article]Among the numerous volumes dealing with the spiritual, the mystical, and the occult I found a typewritten manuscript that could well have served as a blueprint for Hitler’s theology. This bound 230-page treatise is titled The Law of the World: The Coming Religion and was written by a Munich resident named Maximilian Riedel. During the first week of August 1939 the manuscript was hand-delivered to Anni Winter, Hitler’s longtime Munich housekeeper, with the request that it be passed to Hitler personally. An accompanying letter read,
Mein Führer!
Based on a new discovery I have been able to prove, with incontrovertible scientific evidence, the concept of the trinity of God as a natural law. One of the results of this discovery is, among other things, the seamless relationship between the terms: Truth-Law-Duty-Honor. In essence, the origins of all science, philosophy and religion. The significance of this discovery has led me to ask Frau Winter to hand to you personally the enclosed manuscript.
Heil mein Führer!
Max Riedel
Grünwald
Oberhachingerweg 1Riedel made a smart tactical move in delivering his manuscript to Hitler’s Munich residence. Whereas at the Berghof, Hitler received hundreds of books, and at the Reich Chancellery all such correspondence went through secretaries’ hands, in Munich the only filter was Hitler’s housekeeper.
Based on the marginalia, it seems that Hitler not only received the Riedel manuscript but also read it carefully with pencil in hand.
Individual sentences and entire paragraphs are underlined, sometimes twice or even three times.
***
Going back to Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin, Roman Catholics is what both Eckart and Hitler legally were, and the two men identify themselves as such in this work.
But this public identification with Roman Catholicism was largely for political reasons, given that the two were seeking to grow a new political movement in Bavaria, which is, or certainly then was, an arch-Catholic region that is located in the southeastern part of Germany running up to the northern edge of the Alps and the plains of the Danube River. One could even call Bavaria, and neighboring Austria, which is next-door, and where Hitler grew up, and where the dialect and psychology are very similar, as the German Bible Belt. I lived there in 1975-76, married an Austrian woman, I converted there myself to Catholicism — partly to please her parents — I visited Austria many times after returning to America, and I raised two German-speaking children with her. As Austro-Bavarians who were eager to appeal to the masses, Hitler and Eckart would certainly pay at least lip service to the Catholic Church.
And in point of fact, in 1933, as chancellor of Germany, Adolf Hitler dissolved all atheistic organizations in Germany, and also Freemasonry, which is a kind of occult organization based on the worship of Lucifer, as Freemasons actually admit.
And he signed a special agreement, called the “Concordat,” on July 1933, with the Catholic Church (Under this, the Church got 1% of the gross income of their parishioners, deducted right out of a worker’s paycheck, and so the churches did very well financially under Adolf Hitler. In return, they were simply to promote the belief in God, the afterlife and morality, support the family, marriage and large families, and outside of that, keep strictly out of politics.
This is what a Columban father at Georgetown University once described to me as the “sociological argument for religion,” or “putting the fear of God in people” so they behave themselves even when no cop is looking.
Beyond that practical issue, Hitler and Eckart did support the true teachings and values of Jesus as they perceived them.
Let it be noted that Jesus was from Galilee, which to this day is called in Hebrew “Galil ha Goyim,” that is, Galilee of the Gentiles.
Eckart and Hitler sincerely viewed Jesus as a courageous hero who sought to radically change Judaism into something extremely different, into a new religion that would be founded on the virtues of peace, love. humility, sharing and forgiveness.
Of course, these traits are the very opposites of those inculcated by Judaism, and Jesus failed to change the national character of the Jewish people. It was like urging the Irish to stop telling jokes, the Italians to hate sphaghetti and their mother, or asking Germans to stop working, being punctual, and washing the car every Saturday morning, and instead just sit around smoking pot. It just ain’t gonna happen.
In the opinion of Hitler, Eckart, and of myself as well, Jesus was seeking nothing less than a radical makeover of the Jewish people themselves, a transformation of their character, personalities, values, dreams and goals.
Jesus was promoting a truly new, gentle faith for the common Jewish people, one that was diametrically opposed to their deep lust for money, power, material things, and vengeance, and their abiding and passionate contempt and even loathing for Gentiles.
One example of this is in his defense of the Samaritans, who were a kind of Jews who lived in the north of Palestine, were not accepted as true Jews, did not worship at the Temple in Jerusalem, fought with the regular Jews and would not even speak with them.
In the famous parable of the Good Samaritan, in the Gospel of Luke, chapter 10, a priest and a levite, a member of the priestly tribe, both ignore a man robbed, beaten and left for dead at the side of the road. But a good Samaritan picks him up.
The Gospel story says:
The Parable of the Good Samaritan
25 On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
26 “What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
27 He answered, ” ˜Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[a]; and, ˜Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b]“
28 “You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”
29 But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
30 In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31 A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32 So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.
33 But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. 34 He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35 The next day he took out two denarii[c] [NN: about samaritansone hundred dollars today] and gave them to the innkeeper. ˜Look after him,’ he said, ˜and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’
36 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”
37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”
Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
***
It is clear, however, that Jesus did not see Himself as being sent by God to preach to or educate Gentiles, the non-Jews.
He told a Canaanite women, who was not Jewish, that he was not sent by God to the Gentiles to teach them, but instead, as the Gospel of Matthew 15: 21-28 says, He was sent
“to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
In order to radically change the Jewish people, in order to remake their character as a people — if such a thing is even possible, which it proved not to be — Jesus realized that He would have to discredit the leaders of Jewry, and the teachings of Judaism.
He would need to say and do the sorts of things that would get the Jewish masses, the common people among the Jews, to start listening to Him, believing in Him, then loving and following Him instead.
Jesus’ miracles of healing, which I believe really happened, were designed to kick-start this process, by making him into a sensation, a miracel-worker who would draw huge crowds who wanted to see a miracle, and perhaps also hear a powerful and uplifting sermon, given by a charismatic preacher who would make their lives better and their sorrows more bearable.
Opposing him, of course, was the Jewish Establishment, composed of 1) the Sadducees, who believed there is no afterlife, so just get rich and get vengeance now on your enemies, because “you only go around once in life” (or so they thought), and
2) the Pharisees, who became the dominant group in Judaism, and wrote the anti-gentile books of the so-called Talmud down after around AD 100, claimed that, quote, “even the best Gentiles should die.”
In Hebrew this is “Tobbe shebbe Goyim harog.”.
And said Pharisees, the same ones who had Jesus crucified, and still hate him, still run the world religion of Judaism to this day.
This same group, after threatening the Roman governor Pontius Pilate that they would cause problems for him with the emperor in Rome unless he agreed to execute Jesus, would go on 35 years later to very foolishly rise up against Rome.
The Romans then destroyed their temple, so Judaism shifted gears to survive as a religion and people without a country, as a people with a book.
[edited to here]
From being a temple-based religion, one based on sacrificing animals to a god, the Jews switched to becoming a strange book religion, based on the study and debating about some wicked, anti-Gentile books that collectively are now called the Talmud.
These works blaspheme Jesus as a sorcerer in league with the Devil, a sinner who now is burning forever in excrement in hell, and they depict his mother Mary as a lowly hairdresser and prostitute who slept with and got pregnant by the Roman enemy.
One especially vile anecdote has Jesus desiring to know the black magic of Egypt so he could perform miracles, and the Talmud concedes Jesus did perform miracles. As a boy, he slams the lid of a clothes chest shut on his mother Mary’s breasts, and sits down on the lid until Mary, in pain, reveals to him her deep knowledge of Egyptian black magic.
Thus the Holy Talmud. Believe me, there is no holy book on earth quite like it.
We all know the famous story of how Jesus droves the money changers out of the Temple in Jerusalem, showing a Prince of Peace who, in one instance at least was anything but peaceful, unless you call whipping people and flipping over their tables, sending carefully stacked coins by the thousands to the floor, to be peaceful. In fact, this one act of attacking their money-making so enraged the Jewish leaders that it was immediately afterward that the Temple leaders had Jesus arrested.
(This is something that Willis A. Carto pointed out once to me, saying “You can call the Jews every name in the book, and they are used to it. But if you touch their money, then you’ll see an instant reaction. It was not the miracles or the sermons, but the throwing out of the money-changers, that triggered the Crucifixion.”)
As stated earlier, and it bears repeating, Jesus famously said to the Jewish leaders, according to the Book of John, 8:44: “You are from your father, THE DEVIL!”
And the Jews of today are taught to radically hate this Jesus as much as their wicked forefathers.
In fact, so much do Jews hate the Christian symbol of the Cross that they even ban the “plus” sign because it resembles the Cross. Instead, they break off the bottom leg, the line pointing down underneath the bar, from the plus sign.
any teaching of wisdom can be perverted into something truly horrible, perhaps by an impostor who comes along later, infiltrates something good, appeals to the darkness in many men (ego, ambition, lust for sex, power, fame, wealth and vengeance, etc.) , or as the great antisemitic playwright of France, Marcel Jouhandeau, wrote of the Jews, the ultimate subverters ¦..
“they flatter our vices.“
Marcel Jouhandeau
Psychopaths take over everything. It is called “infiltration and subversion” and wins out unless you have professionals watching for them!
And however good a religion may start out, they take it over with standard techniques (identify, study the habits of, and “turn” those who can be corrupted) and the once-noble faith then becomes something horrible.
For example,
”Jesus can be radically misused to worship the very Jews He fought ¦
(and now also support blindly their “State of Israel”) and actually help these sworn enemies of Jesus, and aid the satanic, would-be genociders of us all!
Pastor John Hagee
It could hardly be more obvious that the “angel” who told Mary she would become pregnant was a Nordic. Even the New Testament admits she became pregnant before marriage to Joseph. Jesus was a half-Nordic alien, with a Jewish mother, Mary, and He became a man of incredible wisdom, courage and love.
He was sent to defang the Jews, the greatest threat to all mankind, and He failed. Even His miracles bounced right off the hearts of the wicked.
“Convince me against my will, and I shall believe it still.”
I believe Jesus was absolutely real and for many reasons. And the archeology record bears out many, many details in the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John), such as how there was indeed a synagogue in Magdala, Galilee (which was an area with a huge non-Jewish population, called in fact, “Galil Ha Goyim”).
Mary Magdalene was from this town, located on the Sea of Galilee (see the map right below), and the foundations of this synagogue and of an entire town have recently been unearthed by Israeli archeologists (who were Jews, not Christians, and thus with no agenda of validating the New Testament).
This validation comes after years of scholars and scoffers saying there was no synagogue in all of Galilee and thus the Gospel claims of Jesus teaching in a synagogue in Galilee were patently false. Once again, they were wrong!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Garden of Gethsemane, where Jesus was arrested, still exists.
What makes you think Jesus would have gotten 3-5 times more followers? Why would the Jewish authorities have not simply had someone poison or stab him? Or why would they not have agitated the Romans against Him further as they they did his followers, getting them fed literally to the lions?
Why do you assume the Romans and Jews would have left Him alone to get these 3-5x more followers?
What did the Romans do to Vercingetorix? Show him mercy? Did they show Spartacus mercy?
They crushed any charismatic leader who posed a threat, and the Jews told the emperors that the Christians were atheists, cannibals, haters of mankind, and committers of incest.
One wit once quipped that dying young and handsome was the smartest movie JFK and Elvis ever made. Now they are “forever young.”
Think about it. 😉
It is very clear from the Gospel quotations above that Jesus was determined not to be spared the Crucifixion. He could have offered Pilate to just leave Palestine, after all, even leave the whole Roman Empire, and go off to faraway India, China or even Germania.
But His decision was that if he could not change the Jews, he would discredit them forever and do this so thoroughly, getting them to act out as the nation of hate-filled murderers that they areand evber have been since they were the wicked Habiru, the proto-Hebrews, that Jewry would never be able to live it down.
“His blood be on us, and on our children and children’s children.”
Amen.
Forever young
No great world religion, or even a small business or shop, is founded without a founder. The fact that the religion based on Jesus took off AFTER He was executed has to raise serious questions of practical judgment and impartiality on the part of those who deny He ever existed.
And no one denies that Julius Caesar existed, or Alexander the Great, even though today we have no histories of their lives that were not written generations or centuries after their deaths. In fact, the earliest documents which we have today on Caesar were composed 150 years after his murder, and the earliest history we have on Alexander the Great is from 250 years after his death, the the history written by Plutarch.
But aside from all this, the idea that His being executed by the Romans frees YOU from YOUR sins is wishful thinking ¦.. and part of the ominous glorification of good humans as being like sheep.
Sheep to the slaughter, yes! 🙁
The greatest victory of Jesus, even in temporary defeat, was to let the Jews savagely kill him. The Jews will be forever branded with having killed a gentle man who preached love and peace.
I realized that Jesus, who was no fool, was “up to something” when I read this account of the Roman governor Pontius Pilate interrogating Jesus, who was in his custody.
.
John 18: 28-40
Jesus Before Pilate
28 Then the Jewish leaders took Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness they did not enter the palace, because they wanted to be able to eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate came out to them and asked, “What charges are you bringing against this man?”
30 “If he were not a criminal,” they replied, “we would not have handed him over to you.”
31 Pilate said, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.”
“But we have no right to execute anyone,” they objected. 32 This took place to fulfill what Jesus had said about the kind of death he was going to die.
33 Pilate then went back inside the palace, summoned Jesus and asked him, “Are you the king of the Jews?”
34 “Is that your own idea,” Jesus asked, “or did others talk to you about me?”
35 “Am I a Jew?” Pilate replied. “Your own people and chief priests handed you over to me. What is it you have done?”
36 Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place.”
37 “You are a king, then!” said Pilate.
Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. In fact, the reason I was born and came into the world is to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me.”
38 “What is truth?” retorted Pilate. With this he went out again to the Jews gathered there and said, “I find no basis for a charge against him.39 But it is your custom for me to release to you one prisoner at the time of the Passover. Do you want me to release ˜the king of the Jews’?”
40 They shouted back, “No, not him! Give us Barabbas!”
.
.
In Matthew 27: 11-26
Jesus Faces Pilate
11 Now Jesus stood before the governor. And the governor asked Him, saying, “Are You the King of the Jews?”
Jesus said to him, “It is as you say.” 12 And while He was being accused by the chief priests and elders, He answered nothing.
13 Then Pilate said to Him, “Do You not hear how many things they testify against You?” 14 But He answered him not one word, so that the governor marveled greatly.
Taking the Place of Barabbas
15 Now at the feast the governor was accustomed to releasing to the multitude one prisoner whom they wished. 16 And at that time they had a notorious prisoner called Barabbas.[c] 17 Therefore, when they had gathered together, Pilate said to them, “Whom do you want me to release to you? Barabbas, or Jesus who is called Christ?” 18 For he knew that they had handed Him over because of envy.
19 While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent to him, saying, “Have nothing to do with that just Man, for I have suffered many things today in a dream because of Him.”
20 But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitudes that they should ask for Barabbas and destroy Jesus. 21 The governor answered and said to them, “Which of the two do you want me to release to you?”
They said, “Barabbas!”
22 Pilate said to them, “What then shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?”
They all said to him, “Let Him be crucified!”
23 Then the governor said, “Why, what evil has He done?”
But they cried out all the more, saying, “Let Him be crucified!”
24 When Pilate saw that he could not prevail at all, but rather that a tumult was rising, he took water and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this just Person.[d] You see to it.“
25 And all the people answered and said, “His blood be on us and on our children.”
26 Then he released Barabbas to them; and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered Him to be crucified.
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVZeQkJgVyY
And this is the true Jesus ” who came to either change or destroy the Jews.
Seeing that nothing could change them, He then got the Jews to commit the most wicked acts imaginable against Him, a man who lived only to heal and to teach about peace, love and truth.
In the most unforgettable ways possible, by His noble life and His horrible death, this great man exposed to the whole world the true nature of the Jews, and the story is still told 2,000 years later.
This is the advanced being who came to this earth to change the Jews, or at least explosively unmask them, whom Adolf Hitler and Dietrich Eckart understood ” and revered.
Now, Adolf Hitler did not wish to go into the divisive issue of religion with the voters. He was a politician who needed to win elections, and as an an enemy of the Jews, that was already extremely hard for him to do. In fact, in the May 1928 election to the German Reichstag, the Parliament in Berlin, his NSDAP party got only 2.6% of the vote, a crushing disappointment after eight years of hard work by Hitler. He was viewed by the hoi polloi as a nut, an extremist, as a megalomaniac, and (somewhat accurately in the year 1928) as the head of a very tiny political sect.
Additionally, he was a a dark-haired, Catholic, southern German and a Bavarian, and this made it even harder to succeed with the taller, blonder, Protestant northern Germans, who did not like Bavarians the same way that New Englanders in America did not like Southerners, and vice versa, or Yorkshiremen in northern England dislike Londoners, and northern Italians dislike southern Italians, and Catalans resent the southern Spaniards, and so forth.
With all these strikes against him, Adolf Hitler did not want to bring up the additional controversy of religion with the voters, whatever his burning, deep-down personal beliefs.
We must also understand this, that in a religious civil war, the Thirty Years War of 1618-48, one fifth of the German people had died, slaughtering each other over whether Catholicism or Protestantism was the one true faith.
This devastation left a horror of religious strife in the minds and hearts of the German people, and a desire to never again engage in divisive religious arguments.
And Hitler not only wanted to win elections but also, after getting power, he wanted to unite all Germans of good will. He did not wish to divide modern Germans along any religious lines, whether Protestant versus Catholic, or Christians versus pagans, or believers in God versus atheists. His goal was to unite his country to free it from Jewish and foreign bondage.
Hitler wanted a rebirth of this nation after their bloody defeat in World War One, with two million killed and four million wounded. Then had come the communist uprisings all over Germany. Then came the Great Inflation of the early 1920s that wiped out the middle class. In the late Twenties the Great Depression came over from Wall Street to Germany, throwing one in three German workers onto the breadlines. Just as terrifying was the rise of the gigantic communist Soviet Union literally next door to Germany,and of its puppet in Germany, the German Communist Party, which in 1932 became the second-biggest party in Germany after the NSDAP itself.
So by 1933, when Hitler came to power, Germany, from the start of WWI in 1914 on, had been through 19 straight years of hell. To face these huge challenges, he needed to unite the country, and not raise any topic, such as religion, which would set the Germans once again at each other’s throats.
So he and Dietrich Eckart kept their true, personal, and rather controversial views quiet about the Bible, the Old Testament, the Apostle Paul, God, Jesus, the soul and the afterlife. These views were quite different from those of standard Christianity, so they kept them out of their public speeches and out of the party newspaper, the Völkischer Beobachter.
In reality, in private, Adolf Hitler believed discreetly and quietly in the doctrine of reincarnation, just as did his contemporary, the great and also very antisemitic American automaker Henry Ford, the famous American general and also antisemite, George S. Patton, and as did the Greek philosopher Plato, the ancient Kelts, the Vikings and the Aryans of ancient India. (I have a major essay on, quote, “reincarnation evidence” on my website at johndenugent.com.)
AH spoke only very briefly and just once about reincarnation, as was recorded in one remark made during light conversation. It is found in the book Table Talk at Führer Headquarters, which was a summary, not a word-for-word transcript, of what Hitler said in social conversations after work hours.
It was based in part on the notes which Luftwaffe Colonel Henry Picker was ordered to take, and also on notes that were made and edited by his personal secretary and the NSDAP party secretary, the very powerful, efficient and loyal Martin Bormann (photo, left).
Hitler spoke as follows on the 23rd of September, 1941, in the evening, according to the notes:
“The elements of which our body is made belong to the cycle of nature; and as for our soul, it’s possible that it might return to limbo, until it gets an opportunity to REINCARNATE itself.”
Hitler only said “it is possible” because it was during a light conversation, not a church setting, or a class, or a speech, and he certainly was not about to preach a sermon like some priest, minister or guru to the crusty Wehrmacht generals and their wives who were present and while everyone was just relaxing.
After all, his goal was always to unite and, if possible, never divide, so he just put the thought out there and left it at that. He did not want his generals to think he was a “kook” for believing in reincarnation, so he left it vague. In that way, no one was disturbed, bothered, alienated and offended.
Hitler’s chief philosopher, the German Arthur Schopenhauer, based all his ideas on reincarnation and a kind of western buddhism. When off-duty in WWI, Hitler read Schopenhauer in the trenches. Death, that is, being killed, was, of course, a daily fact of life for infantry corporal Adolf Hitler during his four years of wartime service, where he earned two Iron Crosses for bravery.
And he had many opportunities to think about death. As Wikipedia correctly says:
During the war, Hitler served in France and Belgium in the 16th Bavarian Reserve Regiment. He was an infantryman in the 1st Company during the First Battle of Ypres (October 1914), which Germans remember as the Kindermord bei Ypern (“The Murder of the Children at Ypres”) because approximately 40,000 men (between a third and a half) of nine newly-enlisted infantry divisions became casualties in 20 days.
Hitler’s regiment entered the battle with 3,600 men and at its end mustered 611. [In other words, 5/6ths of his regiment was killed or wounded.]
The regimental commander (Julius List) himself was killed and thereafter they became known as the List Regiment in his honor. By December Hitler’s own company of 250 was reduced to 42. [That means over 4/5ths were killed or wounded.]
Hitler actually had other controversial views which he did not broadcast to the general public, but expressed them in these conversations at the Führer headquarters, such as a belief that we earthly humans are probably not the only intelligent life forms in the universe.
Also from the book Table Talk, we read Hitler saying, as summarized in a formal style by Colonel Picker:
[stars, that is, planets, or heavenly bodies, are not always sources of light]
As for the doctrine of rebirth, of possibly having more than one life, this seemingly exotic and Eastern idea that we think comes only from Hinduism and Buddhism, actually does not. Many westerners believed in it before the advent of Pauline Christianity.
But yes, Hinduism and Buddhism, gigantic world religions that are thousands of years old and have hundreds of millions of adherents, and hundreds of thousands of temples, priests, monks and nuns, these major world religions which have guided India, China and Japan for millennia, are based on reincarnation.
And both these major faiths were founded by ancient white people, by Aryans who had moved east from Europe into Asia, invading India, whites called “the Aryans.” Then Hinduism and Buddhism spread from India into the EastAsian areas via white missionaries, and they became the main religions of China, Japan, Korea, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, etc.
In fact, the caste system which the Aryans set up over the conquered, dark-skinned Indian natives was called “varna,”which means literally “skin color,” with the whites at the top of society as the kings, army officers and the priests.
So reincarnation, this supposedly Indian idea, is really a profoundly white, Aryan doctrine that whites brought to India, and then it was spread by other whites to China, Japan, Korea, etc.
As for the Buddha, whose real name was Prince Gautama Siddhartha, he was, as he is depicted often across Asia, a white Aryan aristocrat with blue eyes.
And to show further how un-exotic reincarnation is, it was embraced and proclaimed by the great American industrialist and automobile maker, Henry Ford, founder of the world-famous Ford Motor Company, which is today a $150 billion-a-year company.
Henry Ford was also a man whom Hitler revered for raising wages for the working class, maing the affordable Model-T car for the masses, and for publicly exposing the evil rule of Jewry over the West.
Did you know that Adolf Hitler had a bust of Henry Ford in his office in Munich, at the party headquarters, called the Brown House? ”
Well, this great car maker, author, peace activist and public figure, Henry Ford, said:
.
.
In the reincarnation view of life, and of why we are in the world, everyone is incarnated to grow through relationships, pain and challenges.
Then the time comes for everyone, even the greatest or most famous, to die ” die so they can pass into another world, and there be shown a powerful 3-D video, a life-review video, after their death.
They can honestly face their own errors, flaws and failures as well as rejoice in their good points, their good deeds, and admirable achievements.
Then afterward, after months or years, they can reincarnate again, hopefully as a somewhat better or even a much better person, depending on how honest they were about wanting to grow, and desiring sincerely to make changes.
Adolf Hitler, like other great Aryan men and women, believed that we are immortal souls that live many lives in different bodies, times and families, and all this is designed so we can learn the lessons of life.
On the subject of the immortality of the soul, as opposed to the Jewish view, Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, the second volume of which he wrote in 1925 here in this cabin on the Obersalzberg mountain in Berchtesgaden:
(Taken from this powerful video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n63u-iHggSA)
“Due to his own original, special nature, the Jew cannot possess a true religious institution, if for no other reason because he lacks idealism in any form, and hence belief in a hereafter is absolutely foreign to him.
And a religion in the Aryan sense cannot be imagined which lacks the conviction of survival after death in some form.
Indeed, his Talmud is not a book to prepare a man for the hereafter, but only for a practical and profitable life in this world.“
Second, Hitler fiercely opposed atheism as BAD for society and the masses, and once he became chancellor, he dissolved all atheistic societies in Germany:
“We were convinced that the people needs and requires faith. We have therefore undertaken our fight against the atheism movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations ” we have stamped it out.” Adolf Hitler, in a speech in Berlin on 24 Oct. 1933
As Hitler knew, and Alfred Rosenberg, and Dietrich Eckart, right in the third of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion) we read that the Jewish plan is to advocate atheism for the goyim:
“Eliminate religion; replace it with science and materialism.”
Now many are turned off by the Bible or the official Christianity of the various churches, but the key concepts and the reality of key religious doctrines are not limited to those three Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Such core ideas as God the just and loving Creator, the immortality of your soul, the existence of good and obedient angels and of wicked, rebellious demons, of free will, of being judged in the afterlife, after you die, based on the goodness or wickedness of your heart, words and deeds, and being assigned to one of many kinds of heavens or hells based on what you deserve and what you need to learn.
In fact, all these core ideas which we mentally associate with the three Abrahamic religions were basically stolen by the Jews from the very Aryan religion of Zorastrianism in ancient Persia. They began appearing without any attribution ” without giving ay credit ” in Later Judaism.
Later Judaism was when the Jews had no more kings such as David or Solomon, and were not even living in Palestine any more. They had been conquered, then moved as trouble-makers out of Palestine, by the Assyrian and Babylonian Empires. Then they were living in exile in the major city of Babylon and actually happy there making money as merchants and slave traders. Then the entire area was conquered by the Aryan Persians, and they became subjects of the Persian Empire.
The Persian Empire conquered every powerful ancient civilization in the Near East, including both Egypt and Babylon, excepting only the freedom-loving Greeks who were on the European side of the Aegean Sea, such as Athens and Sparta.
The Persians’ religion was Zoroastrianism, named after the prophet Zoroaster, a white Persian.
The symbol of Zoroastrianism is Zoroaster on an eagle.
Later Judaism, having adopted these Aryan ideas, then passed them on 500 years later to its offshoot, Christianity, and then, 600 years after that, to another offshoot, Islam. But all these doctrines about the soul, the afterlife, God, and the battle between good and evil, were 100 percent Aryan in their origin.
As for the gods, all our white and Aryan ancestors believed in the existence of a Creator God and of various lesser gods, whether it was the Greeks, Romans, Kelts, the Vikings or, as discussed earlier, the Aryans of the East, in ancient India.
That is an undeniable fact, and we see to this very day the beautiful temples our white, pagan or heathen forefathers built to those gods and goddesses in whom they believed, and for whom they built very expensive and truly beautiful structures.
.
The Parthenon, Athens
Athena
The Pantheon in Rome honored, as its name means, “all the gods.”
Interior. Completed by the great emperor Hadrian, a man of high culture, multiple languages and also major military achievements, after almost two thousand years his “Pantheon” still boasts the world’s largest unreinforced concrete dome. Six million people a year visit it.
Were our white ancestors who believed in the gods and an afterworld just superstitious and contemptible fools?
Adolf Hitler literally had any German arrested for publishing writings saying that God was just “the Jew in the sky.” Hitler threw atheists in concentration camps as punishment for spreading atheistic pamphlets and books. That is exactly what the Gestapo under Heinrich Himmler did starting in 1933, after Hitler took power, with all so-called “freethinkers” and their clubs and organizations.
Heinrich Himmler, head of the German police
The hard truth is that you just cannot praise Hitler or national socialism and also preach atheism.
Oil portraits (now in California and in private hands) of Hitler’s parents, Klara and Alois, that hung at the Berghof. Hitler’s mother, whom he loved deeply, was a devout Catholic.
Fournes-en-Weppe, near Lille, France; Hitler spent half of WWI at the front lines near here.
Amann in the Weimar period with Hitler
Amann as an SS officer
As previously stated, the sinister Protocols of the Elders of Zion advocate strongly that the goyim be made into atheists, and believe there is no God and no soul, just science and matter.
Then they will fear to die, because ” if they do not have a soul, then at the death of their body, they will be dead forever, a thought that causes a dread of death.
You end up with this depressing error ¦.
MOST average people, to be honest, and this is a huge problem, would prefer to live a long life as a cowardly slave than a short, brave life as a genuine hero.
In fact, as a result of this error, unless there is a military draft to make men fight (and a firing squad to prevent them from deserting), many men would simply refuse to make the supreme sacrifice.
Yes, they would simply RUN rather than lay their life down for the most natural and obvious justifications: 1) the safety of their families, and 2) the survival and freedom of their nation.
Atheism is the dangerous delusion ” promoted by Jews and their pseudo-scientific tools ” that no God is watching over me, or judging what is in my heart, or seeing my deeds. I am then just a miserable, two-legged, strangely hairless kind of mammal, a biochemical conglomeration that after a brief run will soon be dead forever.
Once this miserable world view takes over, then for most a hedonistic search for pleasure begins.
.
As for Dietrich Eckart, he is significant for two things:
1) His role shows Adolf Hitler’s willingness to be mentored and to learn from a man 20 years older, one who knew about show business, the theater and thus about performing and acting in public, and how to get crowds going, and enthusiastic and move them emotionally;
2) His private role in forming Hitler’s view of what a truly Aryan religion would be like. However, Hitler felt it unwise to publicly talk about religion himself; he did not want religious arguments; he said he was for positive Christian values, that Jesus fought the Jews, who hated Him in return and murdered Him, and he let it go at that.
What Hitler did do was allow the editor Alfred Rosenberg and the publisher Max Amann to just go ahead and publish Eckart’s writings without him ever openly “endorsing” them.
Dietrich Eckart’s plays really should be translated into English and performed. The play “Family Men” really moved me, I admired the mix of comedy and tragedy, and the ending was unforgettable ¦. Men who must work hard to feed their families, who have no savings due to salaries kept deliberately low, and thus they can never afford to quit, or speak out in protest, and thus risk being fired ¦. Men who are in effect on an economic leash, like a dog, at the beck and call of a tyrannical boss.
Eckart had one constant theme in his writings ” how we as souls pendulate between two very real worlds, two very real dimensions:
”the material, this earth, atoms, wood, stone, water, air, insects, plants, animals and humans, stars and galaxies, and
“the spiritual, the higher world and dimension whence we come to be born here as babies.
We are souls who come here to experience things; we are beings “from the other side.”
BUT we come into this physical dimension needing both feet firmly on the ground of material reality, and we must be practical to succeed in all manner of necessary tasks, from paying bills to raising kids and caring for our parents when aged.
Eckart accuses the Jews, however, of being only worldly, only carnal, only fleshly, and only material, and thus solely after the money, the sex, the power ” and, with the Jews, always after what for them is the sweetest prize of all, revenge.
Harvey Weinstein
Dietrich Eckart was very influenced by the great French aristocratic writer, Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux (1805-76), who believed (drumroll!) that the Jews, this extraordinary, unique people who have no rivals in cunning or malevolence, are literally the product of demonic entities, thousands of years ago, mating with earthly women.
As Wikipedia says:
Henri-Roger Gougenot des Mousseaux (1805 “ 1876) was a French writer and journalist. [photo, right] He was the author of Le Juif, le judaà¯sme et la judaà¯sation des peuples chrétiens (The Jew, Judaism and the Judaization of the Christian Peoples, 1869). The work is said to have received the approval of Pope Pius IX.[1] It was later translated into German (ca. 1920) by Alfred Rosenberg.
Eckart, who worked very closely in Munich with both Alfred Rosenberg and Adolf Hitler, undoubtedly read Rosenberg’s translation of this work into German.
Eckart says that Jews basically have no soul at all, that they are mere instruments without conscience of a demonic power.
This would dovetail with my own views of the Jews as a race of psychopaths, as born criminals, bad-to-the-bone, useless creatures who exist in order to lie, steal, cheat, betray, torture, rape and murder.
It is my further view that Jews descend largely from the prehistoric neanderthals, a hyper-violent, hyper-clannish and very woman-oppressing kind of primitive humans.
These neanderthals then became the semites of the Middle East.
From that race there came a sub-race of desperados, a horde of roaming, escaped criminals, exiles, rabble, receivers of stolen goods (“fences”), prostitutes, pimps, hitmen, archers for hire, and mercenaries, the kind of ne’er-do-wells and lowlifes who were thrown out of society, and told to “get out of town and don’t come back.”
These sociopathic scum that had separated out of the Near Eastern nations were known to the Egyptian and Hittite authorities as “the Habiru”. Who are they? Simply the Hebrews. And some Jewish authors themselves admit this.
These Habiru, this horde of nomadic thieves, were selected to be the chosen people of Yahweh, a demonic prince, an alien being, because they were criminals by nature and thus perfect for his goal of taking this planet over by lies, murder and usury theft for the benefit of his species.
Joseph Farrell, who has a PhD from Oxford University in England, has expounded on this, though to avoid persecution, he manages to never once use the word “Jew” to say so. 😉
And thus, when the Jews lie without blushing, it is because they have no conscience that can be troubled.
They do not believe there is any higher world, any Truth with a capital T, any objective Reality ” just whatever story works for them. Whatever virtual reality they can tell, or “spin,” to the gullible goyim is good ” complete lies, partial truths or even some small and medium truths that are admitted solely in order to build up credibility with the gullible so a major lie can be believed later.
Yes, even telling a whole truth for a jew is useful as a means to an end. Creating trust and credibility is needed so the Big Lie that is being prepared for launch into the minds of the goyim will be believed.
This explains the prestige press, with all its deliberately dry, boring and seemingly factual style which characterizes the New York Times, the Washington Post, the London Times, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in Germany, Le Monde in France, etc.
Their whole strategy is to be credible and accurate on the little facts ” names, dates, places, interviews with some Harvard expert ” so you will also believe the Big Lie which is the whole purpose of the paper, namely:
“that we need a one-world government,
“we need a police state to protect us from terrorists,
“we must mix all the races together to end racial conflict,
“and we must listen to and protect this wise, ancient, and gifted people who are the Jews, who only want to help us build a world of peace and brotherhood.
And his destiny, back in that life he had between 1889 and 1945, was to enter the world of politics.
But politics is, and has ever been, a very dirty business.
Why?
Because 1) it is the worst psychopaths in society who tend to gravitate into the world of politics ” egomaniacs, men and women greedy for money, sex, fame and power ” and they are precisely the sort that is ruthlessly willing and even happy to do anything to get them ¦. to lie, steal, defame, betray and murder, to start unnecessary wars, or murder their political rivals.
https://johndenugent.com/psychopaths-in-power/
The young Tony Blair
and politics is dirty also because of
2) the basic nature of the masses, of the people in general, of the voters, of the public.
The average Joe or Jill, regardless of their education level, is neither a devil nor an angel. Winston Churchill was anything but a hero to me, and in fact was a war criminal. But he was brilliant, and he said many trenchant things. One was this:
The sad truth is the average fellow is often ignorant, selfish and not terribly interested in hearing unpleasant truths about reality. He especially dislikes hearing that painful changes must be made and comforting myths abandoned. And no proof matters if he is determined not to listen.
The public actually wants to be flattered by being told how very right they are, because the majority, reincarnation would say, are young souls, recently arisen from the animal stage, humanimals for whom the truth is unimportant.
So democracy, meaning in Ancient Greek, supposedly “the rule of the average people,” must end up absurd in actual practice. The demos, the people, is morally and intellectually mediocre, and so their democracy also is morally and intellectually mediocre.
Therefore, the great German poet Friedrich Schiller said that “votes should be weighed, not counted.”
For Adolf Hitler, the practical politician living in the Weimar parliamentary democracy, the trick would be to get both the right-wing conservative nationalists and the left-wing working-class socialists, who had been bitterly opposed for generations to each other, to unite, and under him, and this although the two groups had been raised for generations to despise, hate and fight against each other.
Hitler’s goal was to create something never seen before, a “national kind of socialism,” something that was both right and left, with a red flag for the left-wing workers combined with the right-wing colors of red, black and white, the colors of the Prussian kings.
Dietrich Eckart wrote in his essay Männer (“Men”), reflecting on the common German proverb “Politik verdirbt den Charakter” (“Men”)
“It is not politics that ruins character, but character that ruin politics. It is something unclean around the whole world ¦.. The man who is rich inside resists political activity ” as did Bismarck [who as the Iron Chancellor of Prussia 1862-90 unified and led Germany] for his whole life ”
as if he sensed that its first and greatest danger to him was not something lurking to destroy his enjoyment of life but something threatening the evolution of his soul.”
.
So Eckart and Hitler both loved the people but saw that tough love without any delusions was the only way to really help and uplift them.
And now to the work by Dietrich Eckart and Adolf Hitler.
.
.