Why the atrocious British starvation blockade of 1915-19 made Hitler want a “breadbasket” region from the Slavs; lip-reading the soldiers 100 years ago

Spread the love

…..To read if not already done: WN biography of JdN

.

 

…..Hitler’s moral and strategic disaster in Russia:  the goal was to seize European Russia for Germany, not just destroy bolshevism

Aswedish comrae wrote me:

  • I believe Adolf was tricked into attacking Russia. White on white. I think Stalin admired Adolf.
John
  • Well, no, and Hitler was rarely tricked, except by Bavarian premier Gustav von Kahr, who betrayed the actually very promising Beer Hall Putsch of Nov. 1923.
  • Hitler understood accurately that if Germany became liberated from jew control, within a decade all the other white countries, being still jew-ruled, and brainwashed into fearing the Germans, would go to war with it.
  • And having experienced the starvation of German civilians 1915-19, when the Royal Navy blockaded all German ports, Hitler wanted Ukraine as a bread basket… AND of course also to destroy bolshevism.
  • A true superpower must have its own food supply. 

Hitler’s great mistake in Russia

.

…..Who really was and is JdN?

Hitler ‘s Landsberg prison cell in 1924

   I dyed it black so you get it. My goal the last time was a worker-and-farmer movement, with even a communist-like red flag, and a party with the name “socialist workers” in it, so I had to look average myself, and like a working-class man.  

https://johndenugent.com/why-it-should-be-beyond-obvious-to-not-look-that-much-like-hitler/

….The German Drang nach Osten and the British and Russian co-responsibility

.
While Hitler made a catastrophic error in invading Russia to seize land, not liberate it, others deserve some real blame too for that horrible choice.
.
Britain starved 900,000 German civilians to death AFTER the Great War had ended. The lesson: Germany must have its own independent food source.
.
“We Germans” (I am American now) surrendered in good faith in 1918, undefeated, and merely retreating in good order, with faith (LOL) in US president Woodrow Wilson and his lofty promise of an end to militarism (including even that of the Allies!):
.
–“a war to end all wars,”
–“a peace without victors” and
–“self-determination for all peoples”
.
(which sort-of would exclude, except in a parallel dimension, 1) condemning a democratic and anti-militaristic Weimar Germany to eternal poverty and 2) giving 12 million innocent Germans to a hostile France, Italy, Poland and Czechoslovakia...)
.
…then the Royal Navy kept up the starvation blockade AFTER the war, and no more food came from Poland and Ukraine, which we Germans had withdrawn from in 1918, again in good faith.
.
We starved and died, starved and died, and starved some more until — after many months of horror — we signed the slow-genocide “Treaty of Versailles.”
.
.
The British commander in Cologne wrote to Whitehall (he was all heart) to warn that the starvation blockade was affecting the morale of his troops, who were “bothered” by the tears and moans of little children, weeping and dying from hunger.
.
THIS atrocity is what caused my “breadbasket thinking” — that Germany MUST have its own food-growing area in the East. 
.
And there was also just so little trust in the word of the Russians.
.
“We Germans” did nothing at all to hurt the Russians before they got into a pan-slavic delusion that the tsar had to rule all the Slavs of Europe….
.
….and that EVEN meant “taking back” all the areas that once had been slavic — 600 years before — including the muddy slavic villages of the originally pre-German, slavic Berlin, Dresden and Leipzig!
.
The tsar, with a lovely German wife, Alexandra,
….and a huge empire without enemies (except the dangerous internal ones such as the Jews, who needed war, chaos and defeat to come to power)….
….lied to his own first cousin, the German emperor Wilhelm II, and said to him repeatedly in letters that Russia had no hostile intents.
.
Nicholas II and Wilhelm II
.
.
This Jewashington Post article is so very misleading.  Why would Russia support a tiny Serbia that really did arrange the assassination of the heir to the Austrian throne — if not out of the ideology of pan-slavism?
The assassin, the human turd Gavrilo Princip, was a swarthy neanderthal who did not even look slavic. The Serbian government secretly financed the “Black Hand” movement which put him up to it.
.
The heir to the Austrian throne and his wife
.
How gallant to shoot the wife too….
.
What was the Austrian emperor supposed to do after Serbia murdered his son? Turn the other cheek?
 .
.
So we see this spectacle:
.
Nicholas II then has his Christian, Russian-Orthodox, and absolute monarchy (beleaguered by dangerous internal Jews and Masons)….
….ally itself with the Freemasonic and Jew-ridden French Republic (which had just let off the Jewish traitor Captain Dreyfus, taken all Christian religion out of the public schools, and even banned Christian religious processions)
.
….and also get in bed with the equally putrid, paedophilic, Judaeo-Masonic English ruling class.
.
And this bizarre alliance was set up by Russia against a Germany which shared all its conservative values with Russia….
.
…..and had no contentious issues whatsoever with the Russian state or people.
.
And did the British royal family lift one single finger in 1917-18 for their own cousin, the tsar, when the Jew bolsheviks had seized him, his wife and kids — a tsar who also was their ally – and communist jews had this man in their bloody clutches?
Nicholas II of Russia and George V of England — same grandmother, Queen Victoria, and same German grandfather, Prince Albert of Saxony-Coburg!

Queen Victoria and her German consort, Prince Albert (who, btw, introduced the wonderful German Christmas tree to the English-speaking world)

 

 

Again — this guy on the right, George V of England, let the Jew bolsheviks shoot and chop up the guy on the left, Nicholas II of Russia, his own cousin and ally.

.
Let the goyim die!
.
How incredibly obtuse was Nicholas II in 1914!
.
With the Jewish revolutionaries breathing down his neck, having already killed his grandfather, Alexander II in 1881,
.
.
..and his own brilliant prime minister, Peter Stolypin, in 1911 — in his presence —
…right in the Kiev Opera House…
….using this filthy, swarthy Khazar Jew, “Bogrov”:
.
.
…this Nicholas II sought a war for the madness of pan-slavism (whereas the various Slavs do not even get along in the least, and in fact hate each other) that triggered a world-wide bloodbath.
.
Yugoslavia broke up because the various Slavs there hated each other, as did the two parts of Czecho-Slovakia, and look now at the Ukrainians putting a hatred on Russia…. How can there be pan-slavism at all when the only thing uniting the Slavs is mutual disgust? 😉
.
The tsar really did deserve to die personally for being the main goy fool behind WWI — but certainly not his innocent and beautiful family.
.
WWI was really about this:
The gleeful Jew was financing agents to trigger
.
…..insane ego, rivalry, jealousy and fratricidal hatred in all the Aryan peoples.
.
Why?
.
Because the Jew hated how our white glory, technology, skill, inventions, and massive imperial power were covering the world with our genius…
….and proving who REALLY is God’s chosen people, the Aryan race.
Ego
Causes
Suffering.
So the Jew, who is ego incarnate, promotes the ego in us so we Aryans kill each other.
At Verdun in 2004
.
.

…..”We’re here because we’re here” lip-reading the lads 100 years ago

.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdmAfsm18tA

…..Your support is needed and deeply appreciated

…..CONTACT AND SUPPORT

Contact/Supporting VIRTUS

John de Nugent
306 South Steel Street
Ontonagon MI 49953

 

Telephone:  +1 (906)  884-6689

VK.com  https://vk.com/johndenugent

(Excellent, free-speech Russian answer to Facebook)

Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/john.denugent.3

Jewish owner Mark Zuckerberg has deleted me twice for un-p.c. posts

Skype:  John de Nugent (Ontonagon)

LOL!

To donate or volunteer, click here

En francais

Contacte/Soutien

Auf deutsch

Kontakt/Spenden

 

11 Comments

    • Not bad; I watched it. It proves very well that Freemasonry is satanic.

      But if we are in harmony with Almighty God’s will, no occult practice or building design can prevail.

      So something was wrong with the German purpose, as my article shows.

      • Document No.103202/06 signed by Soviet Chief of Staff Kirill Meretskov on September 18th, 1940 revealed that Stalin was preparing to invade Western Europe on July 10th, 1941. The Germans invaded the Soviet Union with only three weeks to spare.

        I remember the Führer saying in his speech to the Reichstag that if someone is standing there pointing a rifle at you, you don’t wait for them to pull the trigger. Germany had no choice but to invade.

        But as you say, something was not right.

  1. The later Queen Zita of Austria knew that Franz-Ferdinand would have be killed:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlCiOclSjEs

    As Austria’s and Hungary’s last queen she was very unpopular, because she was born into a French aristocratic family. In Austria they called her a “Welsche”. Welsch people were French people. It is like an American calling a Mexican a “beaner” or an Arab a “sandnigger”. Zita was so anti-German that she forbade Austrian soldiers to fight on the western front against the French. In 1917 she conspired with her brother, the last Habsburg emperor, against Germany. Her husband, Emperor Charles, was totally under her control. Charles offered the French a peace agreement. In this agreement he wanted to give Alsace-Lorraine or Elsass-Lothringen back to France, and pleased the French by saying that a total victory of Germany was not in the interest of Austria.

    So the Germand felt betrayed by their ally. Without the German army the Austrians would not even have been able to win against Serbia!

    The Austrian queen even only spoke French with her children!

    In 1912 an anti-Masonic paper in France published that the Austrian prince would be killed by the Freemasons. Two years later, a drunken Serbian prince talked about the same thing in London. The Austrian foreign minister Czernin even blamed the Masons for the killing of Franz-Ferdinand.

    So the treacherous Habsburgs lost their empire, which hd become so multicultural and had an anti-German leadership.

    Even back then the house of Rothschild was running the show in Vienna. They received the title of “Baron” from Emperor Franz-Josef. Many jews fought with great passion for Austria in Galicia, because they hated the antisemitic Russians and could count on Habsburg. King Charles praised jewish soldiers as “very patriotic”.

    But the big Zionists had other plans for Europe, although Kissinger later saw Austria-Hungary as a role model for Europe. Otto von Habsburg became the leader of the Pan European Movement which is based on the ideas of Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, who was of Bohemian heritage. Otto was so anti-German that he wanted the Austrian military to fire on the German soldiers in March 1938 [when Austria merged with Germany].

    Now you see why the Habsburgs still get a very good press, while the Hohenzollerns of Prussia do not!

    • Thank you! It was always about what was good for THEM.

      Of course, Freemasons (controlled by jews) in London and Paris were constantly stirring the other nationalities in Austria-Hungary up. They had to be either appeased or crushed.

  2. For 68 years Austrian Emperor Franz-Josef ruled over the fragile state that included 16 different ethnic groups:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDjS7-9gLO4

    People called him “alter Prohaska”. It means “old bureaucrat”.

    He did not want to change anything, only keep his power over the huge state, always friendly towards the Slavs and jews.

    The energetic Wilhelm/William II from Germany was much more popular by the with the German nationalists living in Austria than Franzl:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7PA3_qRVwg

  3. In Mein Kamp Hitler wrote that his worldview was formed when he was in Vienna before WW1, and if I am not mistaken, that included territorial expansion to the east.

    • Well, what did happen in Vienna is Hitler developed a very low opinion of most Slavs and the various Balkan peoples, and a feeling they were a lazy, unreliable, and dishonest lot that had to be ruled by disciplined Germans, or moved out — or given their own country.

      Of course, this mindset, which Hitler shared with many, many other Austrians of Germanic blood, and with most Germans, and with many Anglo-Saxons of that era, too, would be highly conducive to the next mental step, the conquest of Russia for the Germans to settle and exploit themselves, with many Russians as serfs,or like American Indians on reservations.

      After Hitler’s Vienna years came the move to Munich, Germany, then WWI and years of severe food shortages and malnutrition, and in 1919 even outright starvation, with as many as 900,000 civilians perishing miserably from a lack of food.

      So this Lebensraum thing was no impractical consideration!

      “Can Germany survive as a free nation if it cannot feed itself?” (The dependence on foreign food importation has to be a constant worry also for China, Japan, and for that matter, England as well. If a foreign navy can blockade your ports, or sink your ships, your people will starve, which is a very slow, horrible way to die.)

      This article on the German concept of Lebensraum, while slanted and hostile in tone, is mostly correct:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum

      In 1919 the former infantry officer Rudolf Hess began studying geopolitics under Professor Karl Haushofer, then joined the NSDAP, and in 1924-25, in prison and back in civilian life, it was this Hess who helped Hitler with Mein Kampf, which has lots of Lebensraum thinking.

      Haushofer also visited Hitler in prison.

      • In your opinion, how much of a contribution to Mein Kampf did Bernhard Stempfle have? I have heard conflicting theories. Thank you.

        • Pater Stempfle helped edit the style, grammar, punctuation, etc. I was an orator and people person, not a writer. In fact, in accordance with my nature, I hated it, and still do now, when mere theories, talk, words and books — which can sometimes be a cover for simple cowardice– replaced what we really need, ACTION in the real world.

          It was tragic that Stempfle was killed in July 1934 along with genuine traitors. And it is true that Christian Weber of Munich had him killed for denouncing his corruption.

          Ths part of the German Wikipedia article is accurate:

          ***

          Der Hitler-Biograph Ian Kershaw bezeichnet Stempfle als Opfer eines Missverständnisses und sieht keinen Anlass, von einem Mordauftrag durch Hitler auszugehen. Dafür sprechen auch Aussagen von Hitlers Adjutanten Julius Schaub und seines Leibphotographen Heinrich Hoffmann aus der Nachkriegszeit: Wie der IfZ-Mitarbeiter Franz notierte, habe Schaub in einer Befragung am 26. Juli 1951 erklärt, dass “unter den in München Ermordeten, deren Tod Hitler am meisten bedauerte, […] vor allem der ehemalige Pfarrer Stempfle zu nennen [sei], mit dem Hitler fast täglich beisammen war.”[52] Hoffmann schrieb in seinen Erinnerungen: „Als ich Hitler zum erstenmal nach der Katastrophe gegenübertrat, faßte er mich am Arm und beklagte sich tief erschüttert: «Was sagen Sie dazu, Hoffmann, diese Schweine haben meinen guten Pater Stempfle auch umgebracht!» Als ich mich später einmal nach dem Zusammenhang der Tragödie erkundigte, schnitt mir Hitler mit einer brüsken Handbewegung die Rede ab: «Kein Wort mehr darüber!» sagte er in einem Ton, der keinen Widerspruch duldete. Dabei ist es dann all die Jahre hindurch geblieben…“[53]

          Bruno Brehm macht den Münchener Stadtrat Christian Weber für die Ermordung Stempfles verantwortlich und verweist auf die Polemiken Stempfles gegen Weber, der in der Münchener Senefelderstraße ein Bordell betrieb, was Stempfle eines „alten Kämpfers“ für unwürdig hielt und weswegen er Weber als „Senefeldmarschall“ verspottete. Weber habe Stempfle das übel genommen und die Mordwelle des 30. Junis als Gelegenheit genutzt, um seine persönliche Rechnung mit Stempfle zu begleichen. Demnach sei Stempfle eigenmächtig von Weber und ohne Hitlers Zutun auf die Todesliste der Münchener Exekutionskommandos gesetzt worden.[54] Dieselbe Ansicht findet sich auch bei Wilhelm Hoegner.[55]

          Translation:

          The Hitler biographer Ian Kershaw [VERY HOSTILE] describes Stempfle as the victim of a misunderstanding and sees no reason to assume that Hitler ordered the murder.

          This is also supported by statements by Hitler’s adjutant Julius Schaub and his personal photographer Heinrich Hoffmann from the post-war period:

          As the IfZ employee Franz noted, Schaub declared in a survey on July 26, 1951 that “among those murdered in Munich whose death Hitler died on most regretted […] to mention above all the former pastor Stempfle, with whom Hitler was together almost every day.”[52]

          Hoffmann wrote in his memoirs: “When I confronted Hitler for the first time after the catastrophe, he grasped my arm and complained, deeply shaken:

          “What do you say to that, Hoffmann, these pigs also killed my good Father Stempfle!”

          When I later asked about the context of the tragedy, Hitler cut me off with a brusque hand: “Not a word more about it!” he said in a tone that brooked no contradiction.

          That’s how it stayed for all these years…”[53]

          Bruno Brehm holds Munich City Councilor Christian Weber responsible for Stempfle’s murder and refers to Stempfle’s polemics against Weber, who ran a brothel in Munich’s Senefelderstrasse, which Stempfle considered unworthy of an “old fighter” and which is why he mocked Weber as “Senefeldmarschall”.

          Weber resented Stempfle and used the wave of murders on June 30 as an opportunity to settle his personal score with Stempfle. Accordingly, Stempfle was put on the death list of the Munich execution squads by Weber without Hitler’s intervention.[54]

          The same view can also be found in Wilhelm Hoegner.[55]

          ***

          This is a good example of how even hostile historians (Kershaw, or in his bio of me, John Toland) refuse to endorse all the slanders the jews churn out for rhe masses. They all know the jews exaggerate and lie shamelessly, because they have no shame and they want our money!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*