by JdN staff writer, with additional commentary from former British National Party organiser for Worcester, Carl Mason
.
If you like the following article and would like to assist us paying for more quality content, then please write to John at john_denugent@yahoo.com to learn how you can help us. John would genuinely love to hear from you so that you can set up a private SKYPE conversation where he can explain his vision, and you can help him achieve his goals. We are this close to a new gilded age. Our people need you NOW more than ever.
.
There is a glaring contradiction at the very heart of the so-called Progressive movement and the middle-class Lefty cretins that support it – one evident in each and every country where they spew their destructive foolery.
.
Their policies are counterproductive to their goals as well as the causes and people they believe they are championing. In fact, the policies progressives push help the very segment of society that many of them honestly believe is standing between the dawn of a fairer society and the misery we all suffer today – big business.
.
Let’s look at modern so-called progressivism and see where they have it ALL wrong.
.
Today’s “Progressive Left” routinely call for the protection of the environment, while simultaneously promoting policies that destroy the very lands for which they claim they are fighting.
.
“If only there were less people and more greenery, the world would be better,” the Brooklyn and Soho hipster proclaims, while promoting open borders that strip us of our green spaces.
.
“We need to preserve our national parklands and drive down emissions”, they shout, while demanding houses that require massive amounts of resource and energy misuse be built on land that would remain empty if our populations remained constant.
.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or climate-change charlatan to figure out that with more migrants comes more greenhouse gases and pollution due to the increase in the number of cars on the road, the number of animals needed to feed the newcomers, the natural resources exploited and natural landscape destroyed by building all of those new homes, etc.
.
In Mexico, the poor are lucky if they see a chicken or chunk of beef in their kitchen once a month. While working in America, these same people can expect to see meat, which we are told by the Vegan crowd drives up emissions, on a daily basis. Meat products do, in fact, have a larger carbon footprint per calorie than grain or vegetable products because of the inefficient transformation of plant energy to animal energy in rearing animals for meat, as well as the methane released from manure produced by said livestock.
.
So why encourage poor Mexicans who hardly ever see meat to come here and eat loads of it, if you’re so against the consumption of meat?
.
In Mexico, a dozen or so laborers can huddle together on the back of a pickup truck en-route to work. In America, most migrants that permanently settle in the US will in time buy their own vehicle which they will then use to commute to work, more often than not on their own.
.
This generates CO2 – the stuff frauds like Greta Thunberg tell us is killing the planet, while simultaneously demanding we open our borders to the world’s poor and implement policies that drive up emissions.
.
So, how can Progressives like AOC justify “open borders” when the migration of poor people from the Third World to the first world continues to result in the sort of economic growth that also increases CO2 emissions?
.
She can’t — and that is why the progressive, or should I say, the regressive left, received a shellacking during the 2020 US elections.
.
And the free movement of peoples’ impact on the environment is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
.
The mass importation of cheap labor, and that IS what it is when it comes down to it, also harms our nation’s poorest people – people Progressives claim they care about.
.
Anyone with even the most elementary grasp of economic theory (apparently AOC has a Bachelors degree in the subject) should be able to tell you that an increase in the size of the labor force due to immigration depresses wages. This is why the biggest fans of opening our borders, as well as driving women into the workplace, have always been the multinational corporations that benefit most from the increase in available labor.
.
Progressive policies only serve to help the big businesses they claim they hate. They enrich the elite at the expense of the globe’s poor.
.
Mass migration between economically disparate countries also results in a brain-drain from the poorer to the richer country and discourages our disadvantaged (as well as policy implemented to encourage social mobility, education reform etc) from pursuing careers that fill skills voids we now fill from beyond our borders. Yet another side effect of immigration the Left blatantly ignore. Not to mention the impact it has on our demographics!
.
So, is Britain really helping India, Eastern Europe and the nations of the Commonwealth by stripping them of their best and brightest? Is America aiding Central America by encouraging able-bodied men and women, oftentimes with skills they use in the work they perform back home, to leave their families to come and pick avocados so some California liberal can enjoy guacamole on a daily basis? It harms them as much as it does us.
.
Although I couldn’t give a toss about Mexico and Puerto Rico, you’d think the likes of AOC would know that immigration harms both the host nation and the land from whence the migrant came.
.
She just doesn’t get it, though. She is simply too stupid. Those that do on the Left, though, couldn’t care less about how it impacts people at home or abroad. For them it’s about votes, power, demographic change and ultimately the destruction of our people.
.
End article.
.
.
Leave a Reply