Chinese defense minister Chi Haotian meets with Vladimir Putin in 1999

An Australian comrade and regular donor wrote me (https://johndenugent.com/its-official-the-jews-have-pushed-white-russia-into-the-arms-of-china/#comment-619398):

Dear John,

The people who control the western world are beyond criminal. When the Soviet system collapsed, the West swooped in and looted the country. Then Putin came to power and started to turn things around. He also offered the hand of friendship to the West and they spat in his face.

I read somewhere that elements in the West have their eyes on Siberia and wish to detach it from Russia. Mr. Brzezinski had this idea. So Russia has no choice but to be friends with China. However, the West should realise that China wants world domination. Anyone doubting this should read the speech by the vice-chairman of China’s military commission, Chi Haotian, in December 2005. It is available on the Internet. [end]

…..I replied (https://johndenugent.com/its-official-the-jews-have-pushed-white-russia-into-the-arms-of-china/#comment-619399)

Yes, and it is alarming if true.

The Russians likely understand very well that, being racially white themselves, and with China having ten times their population, having a huge economy and military, and also seeking more “living space” (the “Nazi” term –Lebensraum, which for p.c. reasons alone they avoid using) they will seek to conquer Russia too once the other great white power, America is gone via war and/or miscegenation and immigration.

Putin is also an enemy of communism and a proponent of God, religion and Orthodox Christianity. He tried for years very sincerely to become friends with the white, Christian West, and only turned to China reluctantly, first when Obama overthrew the Ukrianian government, and tried to destroy Russia’s vital ally, Syria,

..  and then even the pro-Russian Trump was forced to take many severe anti-Russian actions by the US Deep State,

…..and now especially under the Russia-HATING usurper Biden, who has called Putin “soulless” and “a killer”!

The jew US Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, says correctly that it is in the US interest for Russia to not be allied with China. Duhhh! Together, they are invincible, and Iran can supply China with oil as well as Russia.

Hiowever, as the brilliant analysts, the Duran guys, pointed out weeks ago, why on earth should Russia listen to Blinken?

Why should  Moscow beome pro-western again, and return psychologically, economically and militarily to the fold of white, Christian countries, when the West (under jew rule) is openly seeking to DESTROY Russia and the top Deep State strategist, Zbigniew Brzezinski, openly stated this??

Brzezinski with Osama ben Laden, whom he hired to fight the Soviet Russians in Afghanistan, which was a trap entirely created by Brzezinski.

Brzezinski was one of the many obsessively anti-Russian Poles

ONLY national socialism in a new — and pro-Russian — doctrine, now “social nationism,” can bring Russia back into the Western fold where it naturally belongs.

This new Solutrean social nationism reaches out actually to all races, including the best Chinese people, to stand united against our common mortal enemies, both the external jew

and our own internal jew as well, our own inner liar, thief, coward, adulterer, hebephile and schemer!

Russians (like the last tsar, Nicholas II) are white. They may have perhaps 10% East Asian genes, but many White Americans have some Amerindian genes, so many good-old-boy rednecks in pickup trucks plaiyng country music  on the radio also have some East Asian in  them!

.

So this symbolic russo-chinese hug is an utter abomination. (And why the hell do the crazy Chinese wear blue camouflage anyway? Are their or our forests blue?)

***

Speech By Comrade Chi Haotian
Vice-Chairman Of China’s
Military Commission
December, 2005
3-1-9

[The following is said to be the actual text of a speech delivered in December, 2005 by Comrade Chi Haotian, who spent 57 years in the People’s Liberation Army. He was ­Defense Minister 1993-2003, and the Vice-Chairman of China’s Military Commission, consisting of top officers and generals.

Can anyone verify the authenticity of this speech? I do not doubt it but would like verification.  The man is an open communist, and a psychopath (like even many Chinese who are not communists), and hates Whites, viewing America as Chinese territory on racial grounds — that it once belonged to Indians!

Note also that he refers constantly to NS Germany and to  the Hitlerian concept of Lebensraum.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi_Haotian

Keep in mind that China has for many years advocated deceitful and covert warfare against its enemies. This is their Modus Operandi. It is also called, in ancient Chinese military science, “hide brightness.”

***

“Comrades, I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Party’s cause will be carried on. In answering the question, “Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war?” more than 80 per cent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations. Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands and the Spratley Islands — Ott] and mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of ‘peace and development’ had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase.

I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas. The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond that.

Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people’s attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even noncombatants, they’ll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war.

We wanted to know: If China’s global development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it?

The fact is, our ‘development’ refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole world. As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single mother in Africa. Therefore no race can claim racial superiority.

However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. Therefore, we can rightfully assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself ‘descendants of Yan and Huang.’

During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific. We all know that on account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the centre of the world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the centre of the world shifted to the West.

In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the centre of the world civilization shift back to China? Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early 1980’s Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the centre of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th Century as the British Century and the 20th century as the American Century, then the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century! (Wild applause fills the auditorium.)

Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined ‘not to be buried by either heaven or earth’ no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage.

Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, the enemies would have already reached Washington before its Congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things.

Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common people don’t believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, begin to question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leading God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China??

The first pressing issue facing us is living space. This is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany’s back then. In addition, economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact, and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very short supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air. Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race, but even its survival is gravely threatened, to a degree much greater than faced Germany back then.

Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered with a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground water is so polluted that it can’t be drunk without filtering. They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a small residential building; in contrast our streets are always crawling with people, and several people have to share one room.

Many years ago, there was a book entitled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of consumption, our limited resources would no longer support the population and society would collapse once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to sustain our nation. It’s not that we haven’t paid attention to this issue. The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue. But we must understand that the term ‘living space’ (Lebensraum) is too closely related to Nazi Germany.

The reason we don’t want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the West’s association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin’s new theory, ‘Human Rights are just living rights’ we only talk about ‘living’ but not ‘space’ so as to avoid using the term ‘living space.’ From the perspective of history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people into going outside of China, so that they can develop outside of China.

Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial!

Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.

Therefore, solving the ‘issue of America’ is the key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the White race.

We, the descendants of the Chinese nation, are ENTITLED to the possession of the land! It is historical destiny that China and the United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight.

In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle. Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology. We still need America.

Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country. Only by using special means to ‘clean up’ America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves.

There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of ‘cleaning up’ America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focused instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country. Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place.

According to the computations of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who know how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half of the population will have to go.

It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths, But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we’d have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party. The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved.

Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites. Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of the new society. Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of China’s century.”

.

.

…..Hitler for our time

Especially important blogs

Contact/Support