DEUTSCHE ARTIKEL RECHTS/ARTICLES FRANCAIS A DROITE
=======THE OH OF PLEASURE, BY RAY LYNCH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUmXFv7XwAE
=======================
Freudian slip: rabbi Nachum Shifren mistakenly proclaims the truth about the REAL racists at a public rally!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLiBP7F07hc
And watch this:
*Radical Jews in Israel hold rally against White Genocide in South Africa!*
——————————————————————————–
The guy organizing this thing is a known right-wing, radical Jewish activist from Israel. He is an Orthodox Jew who considers himself a White Nationalist and has held several “white pride” rallies and events in Tel Aviv. He is considered an extreme racist by mainstream Israelis for his anti-black and anti-Islamic views. Apparently he has built strong connections with right-wing groups world-wide including Le Pen’s National Front in France, the Vlaams Blok in Belgium and members of the AWB in South Africa. His name is Avigdor Eskin.
====================================
U.S. white population vs non-white population (2008)
West TERRIBLE
Total – 70,854,948
White – 38,749,286
Non-White – 32,105,662
North East LIBERAL WHITES
Total – 54,924,779
White – 38,815,968
Non-White – 16,108,811
South HUGE MEXICAN INFLUX ADDED TO THE BLACKS; WHITES ARE CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS
Total – 111,718,549
White – 69,219,167
Non-White – 42,499,382
Midwest ONLY BRIGHT SPOT
Total – 66,561,448
White – 52,707,037
Non-White – 13,854,411
Source: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-state=dt&-context=dt&-ds_name=PEP_2008_EST&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=PEP_2008_EST_G2008_T004_2008&-tree_id=809&-redoLog=false&-currentselections=PEP_2006_EST_G2006_T004_2006&-geo_id=01000US&-geo_id=02000US1&-geo_id=02000US2&-geo_id=02000US3&-geo_id=02000US4&-search_results=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en
_________________
The Solutrean white safety zone:
WV: 98% white; KY: 92% white, OH: 90% white, and PA 85% white. Be there or be square, or even dead if ZOG starts a race war so as to trigger a martial-law scenario.
A wise comrade in Germany wrote me:
“The whites will wake up to your concept, John, but only when they are so broke they lack even the gas money to get to you.” 😉
That sounds about right for our race of ponderers….. 😉
* * *
Please donate, even if you are the FBI, DHS and Mossad majority who read my blog 😉 — click on the logo below — so I can feed and keep my volunteers warm and healthy and we can begin the Eternal Solutrean movement, now that I have in them the necessary staff. I have currently 3400 readers a day and about 10 send money……Are the other 3390 really all FBI and Homeland Security? 😉 Well, they have their excuse. 😉
Give, or the god of the Helix Galaxy will get you! 😉
=================cyanophthalmists take note!
http://solutreanliberationfront.blogspot.com/2011/01/scientists-blue-eyed-people-related-to.html
Friday, January 14, 2011
Scientists: Blue-eyed people related to same common ancestor
Isn’t it interesting that scientists will admit that people with European traits are related to the same ancestor? If this is true, then why can’t the 10,000-year-old skeletons in the U.S. that have European traits be related to Europeans?
From Science Daily:
Blue-Eyed Humans Have A Single, Common Ancestor
New research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye colour of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today.
What is the genetic mutation
“Originally, we all had brown eyes”, said Professor Eiberg from the Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. “But a genetic mutation affecting the OCA2 gene in our chromosomes resulted in the creation of a “switch”, which literally “turned off” the ability to produce brown eyes”. The OCA2 gene codes for the so-called P protein, which is involved in the production of melanin, the pigment that gives colour to our hair, eyes and skin. The “switch”, which is located in the gene adjacent to OCA2 does not, however, turn off the gene entirely, but rather limits its action to reducing the production of melanin in the iris – effectively “diluting” brown eyes to blue. The switch’s effect on OCA2 is very specific therefore. If the OCA2 gene had been completely destroyed or turned off, human beings would be without melanin in their hair, eyes or skin colour – a condition known as albinism.
Limited genetic variation
Variation in the colour of the eyes from brown to green can all be explained by the amount of melanin in the iris, but blue-eyed individuals only have a small degree of variation in the amount of melanin in their eyes. “From this we can conclude that all blue-eyed individuals are linked to the same ancestor,” says Professor Eiberg. “They have all inherited the same switch at exactly the same spot in their DNA.” Brown-eyed individuals, by contrast, have considerable individual variation in the area of their DNA that controls melanin production.
JdN: Guess whose dark blue eyes these are? Hint: taken while peering out the window of a Luftwaffe plane in 1941….a screenshot from a rare video.
Professor Eiberg and his team examined mitochondrial DNA and compared the eye colour of blue-eyed individuals in countries as diverse as Jordan, Denmark and Turkey. His findings are the latest in a decade of genetic research, which began in 1996, when Professor Eiberg first implicated the OCA2 gene as being responsible for eye colour.
Nature shuffles our genes
[WARNING: POLITICALLY CORRECT NONSENSE:] The mutation of brown eyes to blue represents neither a positive nor a negative mutation. It is one of several mutations such as hair color, baldness, freckles and beauty spots, which neither increases nor reduces a human’s chance of survival. As Professor Eiberg says, “it simply shows that nature is constantly shuffling the human genome, creating a genetic cocktail of human chromosomes and trying out different changes as it does so.”
——
I’m calling BS on the scientist’s claim that eye color is just a random mutation that has no benefit or detriment whatsoever. As everyone knows, people with blue eyes tend to be much more sensitive to sunlight. This sensitivity most certainly has a benefit for people in Europe, just as darker colored eyes benefit people elsewhere in the world. There is more to eyes than color–same thing with skin color.
JdN: I would add to Kyle Bristow’s comment two of my own. First, blue eyes increase a person’s attractivity and thus ability to spread their genes. Blue eyes never hurt me in dating women, nor in dealing with men.
They may be a pretty color (blue is the most popular color in the world, according to polls taken in various races and cultures) but they also imply leadership, clarity, directness and honesty, traits I seek to fulfill. Blue is of course a cool color, not a warm one, and I find that I respond well in crises. My brain gets clearer than ever in a crisis. Both my grandmothers — the English-American Ivy League graduate, my mother’s mother, and the German-American real estate champ from Greensburg, Pennsylvania, my father’s mother — had blond hair and blue eyes. (Both my grandfathers had brown eyes and dark-brown hair.)
Other white nationalists like to see in me or anyone else the survival of those genes in our race, now that blue eyes have dropped to just 20% of the population, down from 50% in 1900. In fact, as far as I know, I am the only WN leader I have ever encountered (and I have met many of them in 32 years) who does have blue eyes. (David Duke has pleasant blue-green eyes, same as President Bill Clinton and many other Southerners of Scottish or Scots-Irish ancestry.) I have seen a HUGE percentage of GREEN eyes among hardcore WNs for decades now, far above the white average.
Among writers, I recall well the sparkling, gorgeous blue eyes of William Gayley Simpson, author of the great Which Way Western Man? (I helped him make some needed money by selling 200 copies via Liberty Lobby and the Spotlight newspaper. I visited his home in Cooperstown, NY, close to the Baseball Hall of Fame.) Simpson had a beautiful, long Nordic face, a noble mind, a lofty soul and a distinguished bearing even at advanced age. I loved the man.
Here is Tom Metzger, talking about the raid on his home in Indiana in the wake of the James von Brunn incident of June 2009. He might have blue eyes; I have never met the man, just spoken once with him by phone about an individual we both know who took $300 from me, spent it on women, and then called me a megalomaniac when I became angry, and labelled Clark Lightbridge, who took no money from me but instead has GIVEN this Cause hundreds of hours of volunteer work and also monetary donations, a “n—r”.
Dr. Pierce had, as I recall from working with him 1981-84 and seeing him again in 1990, sort of green-gray eyes. Willis Carto has brown eyes, and Matt Koehl likewise.
Matt Hale, now doing 40 years after a renegade follower threatened a federal judge….
Secondly, a lady comrade (with bright blue eyes herself) sent me this, on how blue-eyed people are more intelligent:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-476244/Why-blue-eyed-boys-girls-brilliant.html
I can certainly say this: Blue-eyed people first appeared in the cold north, when you either planned and worked hard for three seasons — spring, summer and fall — or you died in winter, the fourth.
I do believe that many blue-eyed people are good planners, and that we should not die out.
Stonewall Jackson, professor turned leader and warrior. His first brilliant move as a general was to execute some AWOL white trash. Good man. “The first military executions for desertion in the Army of Northern Virginia included men of the Stonewall Brigade shot by firing squad under Jackson’s orders in August 1862.” Source: http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Stonewall_Brigade
“Just prior to the Second Battle of Manassas, Confederate general Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson ordered three such men publicly executed. On August 19, 1862, they were marched in front of open graves and shot in the presence of thousands of witnesses.” Source: http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Desertion_Confederate_During_the_Civil_War
New Mexico school kids in 1940
===============Who is better on race?
A Pacific NW comrade sent me this:
http://www.whitenewsnow.com/us-news-white-folks/14454-israel-brink-setting-off-false-flag-nuke-2.html#post55250
A “Respectable Conservative” is much more likely to drive into the black part of town and experience his own little “Bonfire of the Vanities” than is a liberal. I have many friends and relatives who are Respectable Conservatives, and a few who are liberals. Liberals won’t argue that the negro is our equal. They say he is not our equal right now, but the situation is temporary and amenable to fixing by proper government programs.
“Respectable Conservatives” say the negro is already our equal, and the only reason he does not function on our level is that liberal government programs hinder him.
Every program liberals have ever proposed for uplifting the negro is based implicitly on the idea of White superiority. Respectable conservatives operate on the explicit assumption of racial equality.
No liberal of any race or sex has ever publicly worshipped the beast, ML King, as fervently as does Glenn Beck.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyo1bGDruoI
Respectable Conservatives our enemy. They are more dangerous than liberals, simply because our people are not as wary of them as they are of liberals. The liberal does some harm when he takes more of our money to “help” the negro. The Respectable Conservative does far greater harm when he, being more believable, tells our youngsters that the African is their equal.
===============JEWS AGITATE BLACKS WHO COULD BE OUR ALLIES
From a Washington, DC comrade to me:
If the Jews would get out of the way, I think blacks (those who are American, not African) and whites would be natural allies. Blacks in America are also part white, and what they seek is inclusion. But jews make them only see exclusion even where it doesn’t exist, and they make them hate us to the point of murder.
Shortly after Obama won his election, I went to a presentation by ACORN and WPFW radio in DC. They also had on the Panel this Jewish professor, Allan Lichtman.
Here, the fawning reporter calls him a “genius.”
The “whites” on the panel were Jewish. The discussion was about the election, and their racial delusions around it. The audience was mostly black, and most of the “whites” appeared to be Jewish. I wished that I had my video camera. Lichtman went on about how “only 40%” of whites voted for Obama (he wouldn’t have won without them, but he didn’t say that). And he went on and on about WHITE people (he gritted his teeth when he said that.) He was race-baiting the blacks, promoting hatred.
I think blacks really do want to have honest racial discussions with whites. But they can’t because the Jews are in the way. So, they continue to feel profoundly excluded because Jews make them believe it, and then they commit crimes against whites out of anger, and further their exclusion.
* * *
My comment:
The answer is to support the Eternal Solutrean movement, and get the elite 10% critical mass we need.
A carving from Puma Punku, Bolivia, about which I have blogged (https://johndenugent.com/?s=%22Puma+Punku%22), an ancient city near Lake Titicaca, carved out of granite (which only a diamond can cut) with 80-ton stones. It was destroyed by a sudden, ultra-violent flood, but this and many other carvings survived.
Leave a Reply