-
John D. NugentThe more I learn about Charlemagne the more I loathe the man.
-
John D. NugentKind of a FDR of his day, a total tool of the Jews.
-
John D. NugentBeheaded thousands of Saxon nobles at Verden for refusing to renounce Odinism, their native religion.
-
John D. NugentPermitted Jews to engage in the white slave trade. He captured thousands of white Slavic boys and girls (for him, as a fanatic Catholic, those Slavic heathens had no human rights at all; they were just “devil worshippers”; the word “slave” comes from the word “Slav”) and sold them to Jews, who sold them to Arabs. They were in fact bought and sold at Verdun in eastern France, the boys were castrated by Jews, and then they were sent down in carts to Marseilles, France to be shipped across the Mediterranean to the Arabs. The boys grew up as eunuchs to serve the sultan, others were worked TO DEATH in the galleys or as slaves in other areas, and the white Slavic women were stuck in harems. Thank you, o great Christian king Charlemagne!
-
John D. NugentCharlemagne also fully enforced feudalism on Europe, which meant formerly free white farmers became serfs. As serfs, except for the fact that they could not be bought and sold, they basically were slaves. They could not own arms, and thus could not defend their rights, they could not own land, nor move around, nor hunt game in the forest (and eating grain instead of meat made them protein-starved, malnourished, and physically shorter than their lords), nor could they change occupations. By Charlemagne’s decree they were to be peasants all their lives, living only on their lord’s land, giving him a huge percentage of their crop first before any thought was taken of their own survival.(Yes, they and their children could go ahead and starve; all that mattered to the lord was that he got his crops first for his own use or resale.)And when the lords went on some rampage, seeking to conquer the lands of the prince next to them, the first thing they did was burn down and loot the villages of the serfs.
The full horrors of Charlemagne’s system of feudalism were introduced to England by the Normans, and my account of the “Harrowing of the North” is particularly hair-raising:
See “The Horror of the Harrowing” 1/3rd down here: https://johndenugent.com/the-norman-conquest-gives-england-to-jews
The horror of the Harrowing
The deliberate annihilation by William and his Normans of all foodstocks and livestock – like Stalin’s “Holodomor” in the 1930s, a famine genocide which the Soviet dictator deliberately caused in the Ukraine to break the independent farmers – meant that anyone who survived the initial Norman massacres with the sword or lance would still die eventually of starvation over the northern European winter.
The land was even salted by the Normans – just as the Romans had done with Carthage – so as to destroy its fertility for decades forward.
As the monk Orderic relates – and again, this Orderic was otherwise a blatant admirer of William – the wretched survivors were reduced literally to the horrors of cannibalism and necrophagy. Some killed and ate their dying family members, and cracked open the skulls of the dead to devour their brains.
This is a chapter of British history of unparalleled darkness, unequaled until the Irish genocide by British Normans 1550-1850, and then the bombing by Norman-ruled Britain of the Saxon capital of Dresden in 1945, which killed at least 350,000 civilians (and horrified many good English people).
This deliberate campaign of terror or horror explains the Pope’s threat of excommunication. Unsurprisingly, among the starved, wretched survivors – with their immune systems severely weakened by hunger, physical abuse (including rape) and emotional trauma — a plague also followed, killing even more of England’s finest northern blood.
Orderic, though half-Norman himself and a supporter, like the pope, of the winner, could find no way to defend William after this unparalleled holocaust:
The King stopped at nothing to hunt his enemies. He cut down many people and destroyed their homes and land. Nowhere else had he shown such cruelty.
To his shame he made no effort to control his fury, and he punished the innocent with the guilty. He ordered that crops and herds, tools and food should be burned to ashes. More than 100,000 people perished of hunger.
I have often praised William in this book, but I can say nothing good about this brutal slaughter. God will punish him.
Interestingly, after that prediction, in his later years William’s wife died prematurely, and William’s own son
Robert Curthose rose up in revolt against him, ravaging his father’s Norman French domains.
The older William then became grossly fat, and in 1087 he was told that King Philip of France had described him as resembling a pregnant woman. Feeling insulted, a furious William then mounted an attack on the French king’s territory.
But after capturing and setting fire to the innocent city of Mantes, he was thrown high in the air by his horse, landed hard on his groin on the metal pommel of his saddle…..
Ouch… that is the pommel sticking up.
……and died after three weeks of agony from a ruptured groin. He was then friendless and absolutely, “utterly alone,” as Orderic notes.
Sadly, the four-year “Harrowing of the North” by William was just the beginning of a new, long dark age of Norman oppression, of the crushing of ancient freedoms for the English people, and soon after that for the Welsh, Scots and the Irish against whom English armies were sent.
William Wallace fights against the Normans (not against the common people of England!).
In some ways the Norman Conquest was not unlike the Bolshevik Revolution, which only involved about 50,000 bolsheviks, who took over a vast country of 150 million. The Norman Conquest, like the Bolshevik putsch, brought war, enslavement, exploitation and fear to the vast majority of the people.
And from this “harrowing” we can see that although the Normans had picked up the French language (from settling in northern France between 900 and 1066), and French certainly is the vehicle of a high culture full of wine, women, song, poetry, cuisine, beauty and elegance, the Normans themselves remained merely Viking marauders in their hearts, still being – to this very day – what the Anglo-Saxon “Battle of Maldon” poem said once of the Vikings: “pirates,” “scavengers” and “slaughter-wolves.”
All the British peoples had to learn bitterly that “if you make it, a Norman will take it” – your land, your crops, your pride, and if possible your wife’s or daughter’s virtue.
It all reminds me exactly of what, over in Eastern Asia, the psychopathic mongol Genghis Khan once said boastfully, giving his own infamous, peculiar definition of pleasure:
The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to
see his cities reduced to ashes, to ride his horses, to see those who love him
shrouded in tears, and to take to your chest his wives and daughters.
.
See also my shocking essay: https://johndenugent.com/psychopaths-in-power
So Larouche was wrong about Charlamagne? Oh no! This is bad news. I agree with your point on interest rates so your analysis has merit. Maybe Charlamagne didn’t understand what he was doing in banking?
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2013/eirv40n11-20130315/44-50_4011.pdf
Larouche’s EIR published this by Andromidas….
Charlemagne established the foundations of what we
now call European civilization, including advances in
education, literacy, agriculture, transportation, and
public works. He was the first to conceive of modern,
government-directed economic-development policies.
His was the first modern Western government to order
the construction of great infrastructure projects, building
schools, monasteries, churches, and cities, and the transportation
grid of canals and bridges, whose purpose was
to improve the standard of living of his subjects.
His most visionary infrastructure project was the
“Fosse Carolina,†a man-made channel linking the
Black Sea to the North Sea, by connecting the Rhine
River and Danube River basins, an achievement not to
be replicated until construction of the first Transcontinental
Railroad in the young United States.