===== Somebody tries really hard to imitate Alex Jones and called me ….
This was, as I began to figure out, an attempted “punking” where dozens of different snippets of actual Alex Jones radio talk are used to carry on a kind of “conversation” with me, though it was NOT Alex Jones calling me. (In fact, he bashed me once on-air with Mike Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com for discussing ritual murder of Christian children by the Jews.) The call did sound kind-of real at points, but I caught on early and finally ended the call.
.
=============BRITISH LEADER ANNOUNCES BRAVELY HE IS A RACIST AND OPPONENT OF ISLAM
VERY WELL-DELIVERED
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=t2kKnzW4d8w
Liberty GB leader Paul Weston in London, 19 June 2013.
Join Liberty GB http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/… to support Paul Weston.
.
============GOOGLE HITS ON SEARCH TERM JDN CONTINUE TO SOAR
On June 19 it was….674,000
and today it was 954,000
=======HELPING A LITHUANIAN COMRADE
I asked a comrade in South Africa to help a young and dedicated NS activist in Lithuania, and this is now the ever-improving website:
http://ltnacionalistas.wordpress.com/
A rapid Google translation into English:
.
=======CANADIAN ACTIVIST BRAD LOVE NOW CANNOT SEND MAIL, TEXT, SEND EMAIL OR EVEN USE A LIBRARY TO READ A BOOK OR LOOK AT WEBSITES!
(FROM PAUL FROMM)
Many Canadians like to pat themselves on the back because we have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms that, among other things, guarantees us freedom of expression. Don’t count on it. If you happen to criticize the homosexual lobby like the intensely religious Bill Whatcott, the profoundly Christian-hating Supreme Court says that you must keep silent and keep your religious views to yourself.
If you’re Brad Love and like to dash off a letter to a public official or phone up a local editor or opinionated rock radio commentator and share your opinions on foreign aid, crime, Third World immigration — against all three – forget about it. As Brad Love says: “Ezra Levant criticizes Gypsies and crime and that’s okay. If I criticize Gypsies, they send the police for me.”
On May 13, the RCMP arrested Brad Love and charged him with seven counts of harassment and mailing scurrilous material to local media and politicians. He was released on $2,000 bail and the sort of gag order even North Korea’s baby-faced dictator Kim Jong-On might find excessive. Mr. Love is not to “mail, e-mail or text any person.” That’s right, nobody! He can’t even send his own ailing father a Father’s Day card. Nor is he to communicate in any way “with any public office holder.”
A further sheet of conditions dropped off by the RCMP last week instructs him not to contact or come within 200 yards of the residences of Fort McMurray Today editor Melissa McIntosh, rock station disk jockey Nic “The Beard” Lindsay or the city’s mayor and members of the city council.
Brad points out that he never sent any material to the mayor. The bail conditions appear to be an effort by police and the state to render him a non-person and to gag him for many months as his trial may be a year or more away.
Mr. Love appeared in Court Monday morning. He informed the judge: “I have a court order with bail conditions that I cannot talk to any public official. Is it even permissible for me to talk to you?”
The judge said it was. 😉
Mr. Love moved that the Crown be instructed to drop the charges as they were “ridiculous” and “frivolous” and many of the people named had not even complained.
The judge indicated that decision was up to the Crown. Mr. Love’s next appearance in June 17. Brad Love noted that there seemed to be an unusual police presence for what was a brief perfunctory hearing.
As he was leaving the hearing, he was approached by a Cuban man who had been watching the proceedings: “What you are doing is very brave because the government is after you” the Cuban told Mr. Love. “Be careful.”
“This foreigner got it,” Mr. Love reported with some disgust, “It’s many of my fellow White guys who don’t get it and won’t talk to me.”
Brad Love is a voracious reader and works his way through several books each week. This past weekend he got a big shock. As he headed into the Fort McMurray Public Library, he was confronted by a security guard. “You Brad Love?” the guard challenged him with an arrogant manner. “You’re banned from the library.” Mr. Love was handed a letter advising him he was banned from the library but was given no reason. The Brad-banning geniuses had apparently sent him the banning letter but had mailed it to the wrong address!
“This isn’t a very bookish town,” Mr. Love said. “I am probably their best customer. This is the same place that has a ‘Freedom to Read Week’ poster,” he observed. He can think of no reason he is being banned.
“I’d phone up and ask or protest, but they’d probably say they don’t like my ‘tone’ and call the cops. It seems as if this whole town has 911 on speed dial,” he added.
.
=============”white genocide?” Yeah, man, we for that!
.
My webpages on South African genocide attracts blacks and browns worldwide who actually admit and boast how they want to genocide all whites and just because they belong to the white race. They never ever give any reason.
https://johndenugent.com/english/the-real-why-behind-the-white-south-african-genocide-tragedy
Here is a new comment on that post: https://johndenugent.com/english/the-real-why-behind-the-white-south-african-genocide-tragedy#comment-114619
Author : SATYAJIT (IP: 117.237.203.80 , 117.237.203.80)
E-mail : australia.australia@live.com
URL :
Whois : http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/117.237.203.80
Comment:
If u dare. post it .
Whites are going to be exterminated soon … I am in europe ..
sleeping with white women every day… History is coming to hunt u…
Ha Ha Haaa.
With hate
from INDIA
***
But I replied (https://johndenugent.com/english/the-real-why-behind-the-white-south-african-genocide-tragedy#comment-114624):
***
Actually, your IP address says 117.237.203.80.
India has a very special smell, a mixture of spices, incense sticks, urine, cow manure and cows.
It looks like all the white women you see are on porn sites while you live with your momma six thousand miles from Europe;-)…. and fantasize about a noble character you will never have…
…a beauty and skin color you will never have,
…..and women you will never have,
Ask yourself, you genocidal human demon, what kind of filthy karma made you into such a monster, and what karma transformed you into a ugly, snub-nosed mleccha born in steaming, cow-feces-reeking India and not into the snowy lands of the Aryan, where even our skin looks like roses.
The day is coming, and soon, when you will see what the Aryan can do once he eliminates the lying Jew’s virtual-reality guilt trip — and then the most magnificent race on earth will re-emerge with the SWORD.
So if I were you I would just STAY in Chandrigath. 😉
And none of our women in Europe want you, well, maybe an overweight whore or a heroin junkie with bad eyesight. 😉
What you will never have or deserve….the Aryan woman
.
===========EVIDENCE GROWS OF A MULTIVERSE
Evidence of the existence of “multiverse”
June 24, 2013
“Such ideas may sound wacky now, just like the Big Bang theory did three generations ago.”
From The Daily Mail Online, “Is our universe merely one of billions? Evidence of the existence of ‘multiverse’ revealed for the first time by cosmic map”. By Rosie Taylor
The first ‘hard evidence’ that other universes exist has been found by scientists.
Cosmologists studying a map of the universe from data gathered by the Planck spacecraft have concluded that it shows anomalies that can only have been caused by the gravitational pull of other universes.
The map shows radiation from the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago that is still detectable in the universe – known as cosmic microwave radiation.
Scientists had predicted that it should be evenly distributed, but the map shows a stronger concentration in the south half of the sky and a ‘cold spot’ that cannot be explained by current understanding of physics.
Laura Mersini-Houghton, theoretical physicist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Mersini-Houghton],
…and Richard Holman, professor at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh [http://www.cmu.edu/physics/people/faculty/holman.html], predicted that anomalies in radiation existed and were caused by the pull from other universes in 2005.
Now that she has studied the Planck data, Dr Mersini-Houghton believes her hypothesis has been proven. Her findings imply there could be an infinite number of universes outside of our own.
She said: ‘These anomalies were caused by other universes pulling on our universe as it formed during the Big Bang. They are the first hard evidence for the existence of other universes that we have seen.’
Although some scientists remain sceptical about the theory of other universes, these findings may be a step towards changing views on physics.
The European Space Agency, which runs the £515million Planck telescope, said: ‘Because precision of Planck’s map is so high, it made it possible to reveal some peculiar unexplained features that may well require new physics to be understood.’
Cambridge professor of theoretical physics Malcolm Perry told the Sunday Times that the findings could be real evidence of the existence of other universes.
While George Efstathiou, professor of astrophysics at the university, told the newspaper: ‘Such ideas may sound wacky now, just like the Big Bang theory did three generations ago. But then we got evidence and now it has changed the whole way we think about the universe.’
Comments
Science knows that there are two other realms beside the physical universe, Called dark matter and dark energy. Dark means they are invisible, not radiating visible light or energy, so that we cannot perceive them gravitationally. The known universe is roughly 5%, while dark or invisible matter is 25% and dark or unseen energy is 70%. This is mainstream physics. Some have hypothesized that these two realms are very complex and detailed ‘universes’, though they are still part of the one totality, the universe. A few meta-physicians have stated that the realm between incarnations is in the dark matter. We have a lot to learn and there is a great deal more that we do not know, that what we do know.
By Ron Bracale on 2013 06 24
From the entry ‘Evidence of the existence of “multiverse”‘.
My own meditations reveal our universe as one tree in a forest of universes, all rooted in the Absolute, or Eternal Being. Science today is looking at the life span of our universe; at soome point a tree fallen in the forest, disintegrating back into the earth of Being. Created in the absolute density of transition, decayed in a diffusion that reabsorbs into the grounds of Being.
By Rudy on 2013 06 24
==========website visitors worldwide
.
06/26 @ 06:42 : Wedel, DE[UTSCHLAND = GERMANY]
John de Nugent
681 Canal Road
Apollo PA 15613
Greetings, and thanks for the blog about Brad Love.
But it makes me ashamed to be a Canadian. When I read again about the treatment that the Establishment is giving Brad, I really feel ashamed to be a Canadian. One enormous problem with this case, as in many other cases, is that the public at large is not informed. People do not know what torture Brad Love is going through.
For years we have been urged to write letters to our newspapers, government and so on to make our ideas and concerns known, which is what Brad Love did. But for doing his civic duty, Brad Love has been fined, jailed and gagged!
It makes one wonder how Canada generated so many “non-thinking” heads who, over the years, would allow themselves to become a party to arresting, charging, gagging and eventually evicting a peaceful man from entering a library. Do these people ever think about the consequences of their actions???? Do these non-thinking heads ever realize how ignorant and stupid they are for following such ridiculous orders??? If their salaries today and their pensions tomorrow are more important to them than fairness, justice and the common good of the nation, then Canada is really in trouble. Again, I am ashamed to be a Canadian!!!
Dear comrade,
Well, we all know that four of the nine judges on the Canadian Supreme Court are Jews, and they just ruled that hate-speech laws are “constitutional.”
As I wrote on this blog a few months ago (http://johndenugent.us/english/english-the-jew-destroying-the-white-genes-of-ireland-canadian-supreme-court-approves-liberticidal-hate-speech-laws):
***
========CANADA — DO THE OPEN BOLSHEVIK OUTRAGES NEVER END?
Subject: Minorities Rule; Freedom Drools: Supreme Court Curtails Christians Criticizing Homosexuality
From: paul@paulfromm.com
To: cafe@canadafirst.net
Minorities Rule; Freedom Drools: Supreme
Court Curtails Christians Criticizing
Homosexuality
Much of the Canadian political and legal Establishment are fantically supportive or abortion and the homosexual agenda — neither particularly good news for a healthy nation — while, at the same time, they are openly contemptuous of and can just barely tolerate Christianity.
However, the high court, including Chief Beverly McLachlin, gave broad endorsement to the law’s equality protections for a vulnerable minority against the spreading of ‘hatred.’
.
.
*** JdN: the four Jews (out of nine “justices”) on the Canadian Supreme Court, and the prime minister who appointed them
Fish, Morris Jacob Puisne Judge 2003.08.05 РChr̩tien, Joseph Jacques Jean
Abella, Rosalie Silberman Puisne Judge 2004.08.30 – Martin, Paul Edgar Philippe
Charron, Louise V. Puisne Judge 2004.08.30 – Martin, Paul Edgar Philippe
Rothstein, Marshall E. Puisne Judge 2006.03.01 – Harper, Stephen Joseph
***
.
The court said two of Whatcott’s hand-delivered leaflets had “hallmarks†of hatred, targeting gays as a menace that could threaten the safety and well-being of others, referring to respected sources like the Bible to lend credibility, and using “vilifying and derogatory representations to create a tone of hatred.â€
.
‘It delegitimizes homosexuals by referring to them as filthy or dirty sex addicts and by comparing them to pedophiles, a traditionally reviled group in society,’ wrote Rothstein.
.
The court said the law’s purpose is to ‘prevent discrimination by curtailing certain types of public expression’ but it is tailored, and does not ban private expression of views.” (Toronto Star, February 28, 2012)
.
Christians are supposed to take comfort from the fact that they can still whisper their views about homosexuals in private — for the moment.
.
In a typically Canadian but mischievous approach the Supremos appeared to be even-handed by striking down two of the four counts and throwing freedom a crumb: “In doing so, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously struck down a small part of the province’s human rights code as an infringement on free speech and religion. It removed vague wording that prohibited the distribution of material that ‘ridicules, belittles or otherwise affronts the dignity’ of people on the basis of their sexual orientation.”
.
And they halved Mr. Whatcott’s fine imposed for hurting the feelings of one of Canada:s privileged minorities: “On that basis the court trimmed an original order against Whatcott to compensate the complainants from $17,500 to $7,500.”
.
However, Canada’s latest victim of state censorship remained defiant: “The ruling was denounced by the man at the center, William Whatcott of Weyburn, Sask., as rubbish. Whatcott said the ruling criminalizes a large part of Christian speech on homosexuality and morality. Unapologetic, he suggested he may put out another flyer on expressing that viewpoint and it will be written in what he calls his usual blunt and forthright manner.”
.
It may well be that the courts are not the place to guarantee freedom of expression . The political route — changes of legislation — may be the way to go and, eventually, the repeal of Trudeau:s cursed Charter of Minority Privilege.
.
Paul Fromm
Director
Canadian Association for Free Expression
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4Ku17CqdZg&feature=player_embedded#!
Rex Murphy: Choosing self-esteem over freedom of speech
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/03/02/rex-murphy-choosing-self-esteem-over-freedom-of-speech/
Rex Murphy | 13/03/02 | Last Updated: 13/03/02 1:47 PM ET
Welcome to Canada, land of never-speaking-ill-of-a-marginalized-group free-ish speech. You can say what you like in Canada — to yourself, in a low voice. According to our Supreme Court, free speech is secondary to the right not to feel offended.
I join with Andrew Coyne (see his column from Thursday) in expressing bewilderment at one particular statement from this week’s decision in the case of Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission v. Whatcott — the one where the Justices write:
“truth may be used for widely disparate ends.†What an eerie caution.
The court wants to make sure that disreputable forms of truth can’t serve to get Canadians off the hook for hate speech.
After all, truth is such a wily, insidious, sly concept. Allowing Canadians to use it any way they please … why, that way lies anarchy and uncomfortable dinner tables.
Four hundred years ago, the great Francis Bacon described this relativist attitude: “‘What is Truth?’ said jesting Pilate, and would not stay for an answer.†His contemporary, Montaigne, wrote: “Truth for us nowadays is not what is, but what others can be brought to accept.â€
Truth is either the centre of law and life, or law and life both are the worse for its not being so.
The term “self-esteem†might have been foreign to Montaigne and Bacon. But they would have lamented how self-esteem — or its group equivalent — now gets more play than truth. There’s a fair dollop of therapeutic chatter in the Whatcott ruling, a resort to vague nostrums, such as the idea that
“hate speech†might “oppose the targeted group’s ability to find self- fulfillment?â€
So might bad weather, or bunions. What, really, is that phrase supposed to encompass?
Moreover, how can group “self-fulfillment†be measured? Is self-fulfillment a legal right?
There have been, in recent decades, any number of commentators pointing out the follies and failings of our human rights commissions and tribunals. In rendering their judgment on Whatcott — which arose from the machinations of this same human-rights industry — could not the Justices have offered some view on the often outrageous manner by which this industry operates?
The Court was silent on the manner by which human rights tribunals stack the deck in favour of the offendee against the alleged offendor. The victim-complainant is given all manner of succor and support from bureaucrats. The “offending†party, on the other hand, is left to bear the time and burdens of hearings and rulings. Often, he must go out and get a lawyer, at his own expense.
Nor did the Court offer any real guidance on why our tradition-tested and tradition-hallowed rights — such as freedom of speech and religion — now must be displaced or diluted in favour of new more politically correct axioms.
Moreover, why does the overbearing modern notion of tolerance seem to involve so much … intolerance?
And why do some Canadian citizens — the “designated groups†we hear so much about in human-rights jurisprudence— now effectively enjoy more rights and more protection than other Canadian citizens? Lady Justice is not blind. She’s now winking at subsets of the population, while pretending to be fair to all.
[…]