A COMRADE SENT ME AN ENCRYPTED EMAIL
(TO YOU OTHER COMRADES, WHY ARE YOU STILL SENDING EMAILS IN THE CLEAR ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL LIFE AND YOUR POLITICAL VIEWS THAT ANY JEW CAN READ?? ASK ME FOR ADVICE FOR AN EASY INSTALL.)
I hope all is well. Your blog has been extremely interesting as of late especially that confrontation with the part-Jewish blogger, TIM WISE, who I assume never responded to your challenge.
Myself, I’ve been going through some spiritual growth lately, and finding myself much more open to the ideas you talk about such as reincarnation and karma. I am in full agreement with the sentiment behind your latest post — if we are not right with God, we will not accomplish anything, but if we are right with God, we can accomplish any good thing. We must be sure to stay firmly locked on God’s path, unlike, as you gave as an example, Hitler when he exploited his fellow whites, the Slavs, for the seeming good of his own country.
Hopefully this message sends encrypted – I’m still a little unsure on how this encryption thing works, but hopefully I figured it out okay.
* * *
As you can see from this answer, you sure did do the encryption right! 🙂
And I am beyond delighted that you, like myself earlier and many others, are evolving to a new stage of comprehending the universe. I could call it five things at once in synthesis, or syncretism, that is, a growing together: national socialism 2.0, Christianity 2.0, Vedanta hinduism 2.0, Taoism 2.0 and psychology 2.0.
Natsoc 2.0 because we go beyong the German trappings and uniforms and military spirit of the original model, and seek a folk community and tribal love for each other among ALL Aryans, family life and the rituals of peoplehood, all this while the brain-dead white cowards and the wilfully blind go gradually under as in the mud-mucked end of the horrifying carton video “Attack on Aryan Nations” which had one white female comrade tell me she cried when she saw it:
Christianity 2.0 because we must radically sever all ties to the Jews, retaining Jesus and His true message of love, truth, forgiveness and non-judgmentalism, yet understanding as He did that some men, whom modern scientists recognize as psychopaths, are pure, incorrigible evil
Vedanta 2.0 because it has to be stripped of the Indian tropical/Third World flavor and their various gods and become a teaching of karma and reincarnation for all Aryans everywhere.
Taoism 2.0 because we are not Chinese, but we still need to overcome the divisions between the left-wing and right-wing mentalities. A bird cannot fly with just one wing! We must treasure both the male energy, which leads to conservative, harsh mindsets and punishments, and hierarchical orders being issued, and information being spewed, and the contrasting female energy, which is liberal and leads to compassion and understanding, and seeks equality, sharing and listening. We will never have a peaceful white tribe or peaceful marriages until we understand the two dynamic energies.
Jewgenics
Jewish intelligence, Jewish genes, and Jewish values.
By William SaletanPosted Thursday, Nov. 1, 2007, at 7:54 AM ET
Are Jews a race? Is Jewish intelligence genetic?
StumbleUponIf these notions make you cringe, you’re not alone. Many non-Jews find them offensive. Actually, scratch that. I have no idea whether non-Jews find them offensive. But I imagine that they do, which is why Jews like me wince at any suggestion of Jewish genetic superiority. We don’t even want to talk about it.
Actually, a bunch of us did talk about it, three days ago at a forum at the American Enterprise Institute. The main speaker was Jon Entine, an AEI fellow and author of a new book, Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People. He was joined by fellow AEI scholar Charles Murray and by Laurie Zoloth, a bioethicist at Northwestern University. Entine and Zoloth are Jewish. Murray isn’t but talks as though he wishes he were. “One of my thesis advisers at MIT was a Sephardic Jew,” he announced proudly, turning the old “some of my best friends” cliché upside down.
Entine laid out the data. The average IQ of Ashkenazi Jews is 107 to 115, well above the human average of 100. This gap and the genetic theories surrounding it stirred discomfort in the room. Zoloth, speaking for many liberals, recalled a family member’s revulsion at the idea of a Jewish race. Judaism is about faith and values, she argued. To reduce it to biology is to make it exclusive, denying its openness to all. Worse, to suggest that Jews are genetically smart is to imply that non-Jews are inherently inferior, in violation of Jewish commitments to equality and compassion. My friend Dana Milbank, who’s a better (if I may use that word) Jew than I am, watched the discussion, went back to his office, and wrote a column in the Washington Post poking fun at all the talk of superior Jewish intellect. The column, as usual, was really smart.
But what if Judaism as a genetic inheritance is compatible with Judaism as a cultural inheritance? And what if the genes that make Jews smart also make them sick? If one kind of superiority comes at the price of another kind of inferiority, and if the transmission of Jewish values drives the transmission of Jewish genes, does that make the genetics and the superiority easier to swallow?
Apparently so.
According to Entine, the rate of Jewish “outbreeding”—procreating with non-Jews—is half a percent. That’s the lowest rate of any population in the world today. What drives this phenomenon? Culture. Ten years ago, my childless Orthodox uncle came up to me and said, “I hear you’re dating a Jewish girl.” When I replied in the affirmative, he added, “If you marry her, I’ll come to the wedding.” That was pretty much the whole conversation. A year and a half later, he was at my wedding. Today, he’s got a grandniece and grandnephew living in my house. I’d like to think he had no influence, but maybe I’m kidding myself. Explicitly and implicitly, Jews have been getting this message for millennia. As Murray pointed out, the Bible is full of instructions to marry within the faith.
A culture that trains its young people to procreate only with one another becomes, over time, a genetically distinct population. And if that culture glorifies intelligence to such a degree that it drives less intelligent people out of the community—or prevents them from attracting mates—it becomes an IQ machine. Cultural selection replaces natural selection. For example, Jews have long emphasized male literacy. For this reason, Murray argued, anyone who was Jewish and stupid 2,000 years ago found “it was a lot easier to be a Christian.” Entine called this kind of process a “bio-cultural feedback loop.”
The theory still sounds arrogant, until you hear the IQ machine’s possible costs. Some scholars now hypothesize that the genes that make Jews smart also give some of them nasty diseases such as Tay-Sachs. Entine finds this plausible. He pointed out that some genes associated with brain growth are also associated with breast cancer, including in his own family. During the question-and-answer session, someone brought up another tradeoff: Supposedly, Jews are deficient in visio-spatial skills, possibly because their brains allot extra space for verbal intelligence. That might explain the average Ashkenazi Jewish score of 122 on verbal IQ tests.
Pondering these nuances and tradeoffs, Zoloth reconsidered her aversion to the idea of Jewish genes and Jewish intelligence. What should we do, she wondered, if we find genes that predispose children both to genius and to early death? And should Jewish biological differences be minimized if they’re expressions of—and vehicles for—Judaism as a value system?
Zoloth didn’t have answers to those questions. Neither do I. Part of being Jewish, after all, is talking in questions more than answers. Whether that habit is cultural or biological, I don’t know. But this much I can tell you: I walked out of the AEI conference room that day with a cut on my nose because, in an attempt to pick something up off the floor, I whacked my face on the chair in front of me. Probably I’m just a moron. But maybe visio-spatial deficiency really is a sign of intelligence, in which case, I’d like to thank my ancestors for making the trade. Including my uncle, who, come to think of it, may not be childless after all.
I like your blog 2.0 today. 😉
The big news in the jew intelligence article isn’t the average IQ. It’s this:
“According to Entine, the rate of Jewish ‘outbreeding’—procreating with non-Jews—is half a percent.”
That, if true, is tremendously significant.
As for jew IQ — we don’t really know what the jew IQ is. Neither do they. They’ve latched onto the high figures. The actual estimates are all over the place — because there is so little data on jew IQ. There’s plenty of data on White and negro and various other racial group IQ’s. But almost nothing on jew IQ. Jews are an undercover group, secretive, avoiding open group comparisons. It’s strategic.
The 122 average verbal IQ score, IF TRUE, would also be significant. But, again, we don’t really know. Not enough data.
And note the usual jew lying. “The human average” IQ (by which the jews mean WORLD average IQ) is NOT 100. This is the jew pushing his lie that all races are one — (except his own race) (which is special). 100 is the White average IQ. The German IQ average is 107 (even including the German Turks). The world average is under 90. Probably well under 90. The Japanese average IQ, by the way, is 110.
But the surprising lack of miscegenation. That’s news. (If true.) (You never know with jews what’s true and isn’t true. It’s genetic.)
Having worked shoulder-to-shoulder with Jews in the unforgiving world of the American car business for over 30 years, I can attest to the highly developed verbal skills of the average Jew. I have witnessed word-manipulation and twisting that would make the quintessential `Shlomo´ blush. But this has nothing to do with intelligence per se but rather is a learned behavior which is based on the idea that `what is good for the Jew is allowable and even desirable´. Most Jews is a sycopaths without any scruples – ANYTHING goes, no lie is too big or too vicious, none, as long as it succeeds. `The end justifies the means´ is the bottom line. What IQ cannot measure is the degree of creativity and it is creativity which sets Aryans apart from all others, NO ONE can point to a Shakespeare, a Victor Hugo, a von Goethe, a Newton or a Karl Benz, much less a van Beethoven or a Boticelli; and THAT is the measure of greatness of a race – NOT IQ. Ger.