I first became acquainted with John Lear around 2007. He provided expert analysis connecting Area 51 in Nevada and the UFO enigma in general. Lear is often quoted in related commentary and video presentations as an expert, and I unquestionably trust his declaration here.
John Lear, a top pilot for the CIA and the regular airlines for 40 years, blasts the “planes-hit-the-WTC” theory of 9/11 in an affidavit for a major federal lawsuit against the regime. Lear was already known as a superb pilot and the son of the inventor of the Lear jet. Here http://trutube.tv/…/Videos-To-Launch-A-Movement-Part-4 at 14:35 to 15:35 you can see John Lear courageously telling exactly how the regime terrorizes would-be whistle blowers. Make no mistake: Lear is risking his life to tell the truth! AND we see once again in the case of John Lear how UFO whistle-blowers are also NWO exposers. It is all connected.
I believe that both nanothermite (the Dr. Steven Jones theory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones and see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pL0M5ST8jY) and also particle-beam weaponry (the Dr. Judy Woods theory) were central to the massive destruction and the weeks of concrete vapor and heat floating bizarrely away from the site. I believe that nanothermite (a standard demolition chemical) melted the steel beams and a particle weapon vaporized the concrete and other building elements.
.
A just-released NASA photo from the International Space Station, taken on 9/11/01 over Manhattan, shows the massive smoke plume.
.
See Dr. Judy Wood’s research here: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/dew/starwarsbeam3.html I also remember photos of fried, dust-covered cars located blocks away from the towers. No plausible explanation fit other than Wood’s theory plus nanothermite, which was found in the debris.
‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors,’ Lear stated in the affidavit:
‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL [United Air Lines] 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun ‘telescoping’ when the nose hit the 14-inch-steel columns which are 39 inches on center.”
The affidavit, dated 28th of January 2014 is part of a lawsuit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds, a former government economist in the George W.Bush administration, in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York.
Monday, March 03, 2014
Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers
US Regime Will Have To Rebut Or Accept Statement As Truth
A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.
John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:
‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit.
‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun ‘telescoping’ when the nose hit the 14-inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.
‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.
‘The engines (see photo) when impacting the steel columns would have maintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.
‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1,000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.
The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept a huge volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cut-outs is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14-inch steel box columns at over 500 mph. It would have crumpled.
No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14-inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.
‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including three engine cores weighing approximately 9,000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.
The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.
In March 2007, Reynolds, a former chief economist under the George W. Bush administration, filed a Request For Correction with the US National Institute of Science and Technology citing his belief that real commercial jets (Boeings) did not hit the WTC towers.
Although the 9/11 Truth movement initially rejected the ‘no-planes’ theory as too outlandish, after scientific and rational analysis, it has become a widely accepted explanation of the evidence collected.
Unlike any other form of statement, an affidavit becomes truth in law, if it is not rebutted. It will now be up to critics of the theory to present their evidence and analysis to rebut the statement point by point. If they do not – or cannot – then the US government will be obliged to admit that the account given by the 9/11 Commission is wrong.
The 65 year old retired airline captain and former CIA pilot – who has over 19,000 hours of flight time — also drew attention to the inexperience of the pilots who allegedly flew the planes:
‘The alleged ‘controlled’ descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of ‘controlled’ flight.
‘It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the “EFIS” (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent.
Lear has, according to his sworn statement, flown over 100 different types of planes during his 40 years of flying and holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certificated airman. He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 then spent 17 years working for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.
He is a member of Pilotfor911truth.org, which has consistently shown that it was impossible for jet airliners to have hit the Twin Towers in the way the 9/11 Commission has suggested.
http://the-tap.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/planes-hitting-twin-towers-were.html
Leave a Reply
Copyright © 2024 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes
Nice to see you giving coverage of John Lear and Morgan Reynolds’ credible no-plane testimonies, John.
One slight correction — Dr Judy Wood has claimed in some of her interviews that the weaponry that caused the collapse of the towers may not have been space-based, as they would not need to have been. I don’t think she ever claimed they were “particle-beam weapons” either.
And while nanothermite may have been used in 9/11 in some way, it is rather telling that Dr Steven E. Jones, who came out with the theory, was also a central figure in the coverup of cold fusion (LENR) in the late 80’s.
Watch this video for more about Dr Steven E Jones’ shillary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lASyX1SP2UM