…..Trump gave a master class in how to fight with a girl
Edited to add: I think Scott Adams is saying almost the same thing as I am in this blog post. “Clinton won the debate last night. And while she was doing it, Trump won the election. He had one thing to accomplish “ being less scary “ and he did it.” “ He can hardly be less scary by attacking a woman ferociously. Read the whole thing.
The mewling over Donald Trump’s ˜misogyny‘ in last night’s debate has begun. Trump interrupted Hillary, you see, and if you interrupt a woman, that means you hate not just her, but all women, everywhere. When a woman speaks, men must remain silent and never correct or contradict her mid-sentence because that makes her feel intimidated and the poor, weak, timorous thing might collapse from the sheer, unparalleled hatred of it all. No one seems to mind that the moderator interrupted Trump 41 times, and Clinton just 7 times, but Trump is a man and he can take it, right? Hillary is a mere woman, and one must treat her gently.
.
JdN: Even German newspapers were noticing Ill-ary’s recent bobble-head. I wonder what pep pill she was on for the debate?
Hillary can’t handle being interrupted, but she can handle Vladimir Putin?
Yeah, okay.
Many polls this morning show that Trump won the debate, often with significant majorities. The media is so skewed, though, it’s hard to draw any conclusions from these results. The Drudge poll has almost 700K voters at the moment, with just over 80% calling Trump for the win. Time Magazine has 1.5M voters, with 54% calling it for Trump and CNBC has 850K voters, with 66% handing victory to Trump.
I am going to call this a decisive victory for Trump, but not because of anything he said. Trump won by delivering a master class on how to fight with a woman and win. In general, men can’t win fights with women. If you beat the crap out of her (metaphorically or otherwise), you’re a bully who hates women, and not a real man. If you stand there and take a pummeling from her, you’re a pussy who isn’t a real man anyways. Fighting with a woman is almost always a lose-lose scenario. That’s called male privilege, or something.
Trump showed how it’s done.
From the very first moment, Trump signaled his place at the top of the nation’s hierarchy. He didn’t need to do anything other than adorn his suit with a small American flag. For many undecided voters, it was over the moment they noticed Trump had a flag pin, and Hillary didn’t. She looked nice. Her suit was a nice, bright red (power suit!) and her make-up and hair and earrings were all very tasteful and elegant. She looked pretty. As pretty as a slightly dumpy, frowny, overweight 60 something woman can look.
Trump looked Presidential. He looked like the quintessential patriarch. The man who will make the tough choices and accept the consequences. Hillary got turned into a pretty accessory. Had Hillary been a bit less polished, the media could have cried that she is being held to unreasonable physical standards, but since Hillary herself decided to meet those standards, the subject is now off limits.
Hillary played the girl-card, and in doing so, she invited Trump to treat her like a girl.
And for the most part, he did.
A lot of people are mad at both the moderator and Trump for not going after Hillary harder. The moderator likely choose to kid-glove Clinton because he doesn’t want to get crucified like Matt Lauer did, but Trump had another reason entirely for handling Clinton gently.
He understands he can’t win a fight with a woman, and certainly not with a woman who signals her femininity as strongly as Clinton did last night. Trump has some massive strikes left in his arsenal. Benghazi. The Clinton Foundation. Her private server. Immigration. The Second Amendment. Death Taxes. Bill’s rape roster. Big strikes. If and when he pulls them, he is risking the paradox of fighting with women. Nailing her to the wall can backfire on him badly, because many people simply cannot stomach seeing a woman take a massive punch from a man. No matter how much she begs for it. No matter how justified. For many people, you simply don’t hit women.
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkCQvuWw2HIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkCQvuWw2HI
Trump is walking a fine line, and he is taking his cues, it appears, from Hillary, which is the smart thing to do. He stood on the debate stage, and let her walk up to him. He’s the alpha, she’s the supplicant. That was perfect. He is very gently laying on a spanking, but only with her consent, and again, that’s exactly how you do it. I’m not an advocate of spanking children ever, but grown women are another story altogether. She may not know she needs it, but she probably does.
As long as Hillary never seems staggered by Trump’s blows, he can hit her. The minute the public perceives that he is actually hurting her, he loses. She gains the pity vote. Trump looks like a bully. A few whiny feminists insist he is a bully, because anyone who disagrees with a woman is a bully, period. But average people are watching to see if Trump can constrain himself and not lose it and just beat the crap out of her. If Trump were up against Bernie Sanders, it would be no holds barred, but he can’t do that with Hillary.
Michael Moore, famous leftwing nutbar, watched the debate and then tweeted this:
And he’s right. Trump won, because he spanked Hillary just enough to let her know her place, but not so hard he triggered the latent white knight in undecided viewers.
In the next debate, if she comes out swinging and lands a few blows on Trump, he can hit back, but not harder. If Hillary’s team is smart, they will have her in pink for the next debate. Ratchet the femininity up as high as possible. Although it honestly won’t matter, as long as Trump sticks to spanking and not pulverizing Hillary. Trump has a ton of kill shots, but just because you have them doesn’t mean it’s smart to use them. Not every shot has to kill. A good mauling will do the trick here, like a good spanking.
Bend over, Hillary.
Daddy’s got this.
Lots of love,
JB
…..But TomatoBubble takes the Donald to task…
source http://www.tomatobubble.com/id1047.html
NY Times: How Hillary Clinton Went From Hesitant to Scorching
Mrs. Clinton, with some help from the moderator, Lester Holt, found her footing during the second half and attacked Mr. Trump on his treatment of women.
|
REBUTTAL BY
 Mike King 3:16: For Mike and his ferocious feline side-kick so loved their readers, that they wasted nearly two hours of their life watching that dopey spectacle of a “debate.”
Yes, knowing that some of you would be curious to hear our take and analysis of the latest installment of that interminable idiocy we refer to as the QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show), we downed a few shots of Amaretto and endured the sorry spectacle of Killary Rotten Clinscum vs The Orange Man. And the “winner” is …. neither. However, the “loser” was Orange Man. What we mean by this seemingly paradoxical analysis is that although neither candidate helped nor hurt his or her cause, it was Orange Man who, in the face of abusive personal attacks from the Hildebeast, inexplicably refused to counter attack her on her most vulnerable points — even after she had given him numerous openings by starting the personal attacks. Orange Man could have ruined the lying bitch, but he either would not because he was advised against it by that campaign manager chick Kellyanne Conway and his now-kosher daughter Ivanka, or perhaps he could not because he was not prepared.
Manager Kellyanne and the converted-to-Judaism daughter Ivanka. We suspect that the ladies running Orange Man’s campaign may have de-balled “The Donald “— leaving him defenseless against the very much balled-up dyke Killary. Trump was chumped! That’s a fact and here’s the sorry recap, coupled with how he would have responded had Mike & Sugar been coaching this apparently uncoachable ass-clown.
Killary trashed Orange Man as a sexist pig and name-dropped some Hispanic woman that he had allegedly insulted. He could have responded by bringing up the Bill Clinton rapes and groping and, most importantly, the subsequent Killary cover-ups. Reciting the litany of abused women would have been an especially powerful knockout punch: Paula Jones, Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Wiley, Monica Lewinsky. Because he did not, Trump was chumped!
   Orange Man was handed a golden opportunity to become the champion of the many women that the Clintons have horribly abused. But he punked out.
Killary trashed Orange Man as a crooked businessman who didn’t pay some contractors. He could have responded by accusing the Clinton Foundation of stealing millions of dollars in donations intended for earthquake relief in Haiti. Telling the audience to google the term “Clinton Foundation Earthquake” would have added an especially devastating touch. Because he did not, Trump was chumped!
Killary accused “the rich” like Orange Man of causing the 2008 economic crash. He could have used the lead-in to point out to people that it was the Clinton co-presidents who helped to engineer the massive housing bubble by creating the sub-prime mortgage market. Because he did not, Trump was chumped!
Killary talked about Wall Street crooks who “need to be watched.” Trump could have used the lead-in to remind America that Killary is Goldman Sachs’ Golden Girl, and how Wall Street money is heavily behind Killary. Because he did not, Trump was chumped!
Killary linked Orange Man to the big bad Vladimir Putin and Russian hackers. He could have aggressively and repeatedly challenged her right then and there to cite one shred of evidence that Russia has been hacking sensitive U.S. systems. Because the allegations against Russia are false, such repeated demands would have left her stuttering, stammering and foolishly citing “The New York Times.” Because he did not, Trump was chumped!
.
   1-Spanked-ass Orange Man allowed Killary to get away with blaming the Clinton-Bush housing bubble on him!
2-Angry Haitians protest the Clinton’s theft of earthquake relief money.
3- Instead of forcing her cite evidence, Orange Man allowed Killary to get away with her ridiculous hacking allegations against Putin.
Killary tagged Orange Man as a dangerous warmonger. He could have told America how Killary laughed out loud in delight and clapped her hands when she heard of Qaddafi’s murder in Libya, and then repeatedly warned that Killary wants to go to war with Russia. Because he did not, Trump was chumped!
Killary suggested that Orange Man was “greedy” and also a “tax cheat.” He could have reminded America how Killary’s last act as First Lady was to steal White House china and furniture that she was later forced to return! Simple-minded voters need to hear stuff like that, and it would have been a devastating blow to have her explain why she stoles the stuff. Because he did not, Trump was chumped!
   Oh what Mike and the Mad Cat could have done to this wretched hag had we been in Orange Man’s place!
And there were more blown chances. Opportunity after opportunity after opportunity was squandered. Again, and this was the most frustrating part: it was attack-dog Killary who actually gave Orange Man the perfect openings, so no one would have been able to accuse him of being the one to “go negative.” To use an American Football analogy, Quarterback Trump failed to throw the ball to wide-open receivers in the end-zone on multiple occasions. Instead of winning by a blowout, he came away with a tie, at best. What a damn shame! Either Orange Man is so ego-maniacal that he thought he could “wing it” without preparation, or the ladies high up in his campaign have neutered him — or maybe he is a fake, after-all.
|
Leave a Reply