.
If you like this exclusive article, and others that we publish on a daily basis – that John is paying his small staff for while he develops his new spiritual organization – then please write to John at john_denugent@yahoo.com to learn how you can help us.
Our people need you NOW more than ever.
.
Since Biden’s election to the White House by means of fraud, the senile puppet has signed at least 47 Executive Orders (as of March 28th), unilaterally undoing the good works of former President Trump without understanding the significance of these orders and the consequences for the American people.
Although the radicals in his midst might know precisely what they are doing does Ol’ Joe really want to see America swamped by tens of millions of migrants?
.
After all, he has white grandkids, and they’re not going to be spared while venturing into downtown DC.
.
American “democracy” was based on our Constitution (“WAS” being the operant word, as our out-of-control government no longer adheres to the Constitution) which extended the freedom of a representative democracy to its people and protected us from government over-reach, which in turn made America the strongest, freest (in some ways) and most prosperous nation on Earth.
.
The current state of affairs, created by these same Executive Orders and a Democratic majority vote in the Senate and Congress, are hurtling the US into an abyss with the danger of it becoming a repressive regime like China, North Korea, Cuba, et al.
.
Over the last forty years, Marxism (also known as FULL government control) has taken a strong foothold in American life, such as in the media, politics and academia.
.
Many people in these fields have spent their lives indoctrinating young people and others and have had remarkable success.
.
America was based on a Constitution which extended the freedom of a representative democracy to its people, which in turn made America the strongest, freest (in some ways) and most prosperous nation on Earth.
They have promoted socialism as being compassionate in an attempt to make their gullible followers believe that success in life – or what is referred to as equality of outcome, AKA “equity” – can be achieved if only the right “legislation” is implemented (laws that mandate massive government overreach, increased taxation and wholesale social change, of course. )
.
They have hidden their lust for power and goals by masquerading as democratic socialists, when what they really want is TOTAL control.
.
….just as the former Soviet Union sold their impoverished starving people a pack of egalitarian lies for a full century.
.
Vladimir Lenin, former Communist leader of Russia in the early 20th century, declared,
“The goal of socialism is communism.”
JdN: Statue honoring the mass-murderer Lenin in Seattle, Washington
.
It is an inevitable progression from socialism to Communism. On a continual basis, people’s rights are eroded under such a system and all that is left is a totalitarian regime where tyranny abounds and there is unlimited control of the population.
.
In an attempt to force everyone to be the same, political correctness is used as a ploy in a socialist regime to attack moral discernment. Coupled with the normalization of profanities, sexual perversions, demonic art, pornography and drug use, as well as an attack on the traditional family and social mores, the spiral continues downwards.
*** JdN If you no longer watch most tv, you have no idea just how bad it has gotten! This show is written by a gay jew, and both main actresses are jewish. It made me want to actually vomit.
***
.
Contempt for anyone who believes in God — aspiring to a higher moral plane — is the norm, and anyone that disagrees with the skewed ideology of the Left is marginalized and discarded.
.
….as they were in the former Soviet Union — and are now in our United States.
.
The younger generation, enamored with the idea of “democratic socialism”, are quite willing to sacrifice all freedoms if it means the culture they hate is destroyed in the process. After all, they’ve been told how EVIL it is from kindergarten through college.
.
There is now a large section of society in this country that thinks they do not need to work, and that the government is there to provide them with EVERYTHING! For those of us that want to work and do right by our families, we are all but driven into poverty by lockdowns, unfair alimony and child-support awards, student-loan debt etc.
.
Are these people really aware what the trade-off to this is?
.
They will be giving up on their freedoms and traditions and will have to accept total obedience and subservience to the system in place. Regardless of whether it’s marketed as a Socialist State, as the likes of AOC want, or a jingoistic imperial war machine, as the previous Republican administrations have wanted (remember which administration was in power when the Patriot Acts were passed), we will have to submit to those in power REGARDLESS of which party they belong to.
(Cancel culture once targeted the anti-war French and the Dixie Chicks – ANYONE who opposed our totally illegal invasion of Iraq).
.
With all-out government control comes the danger that property ownership will be stripped away, and we will see the confiscation of firearms and the loss of all of our liberties.
.
I wonder if Big Tech, the media, billionaires, Hollywood and politicians have really considered all of the consequences outright control entails?
.
But then again, like in the former Soviet Union and present day China – the individuals and businesses that help prop up the State will get to keep their spoils while the rest of us starve and/or languish in a gulag.
.
There is now today in America a war between good and evil.
.
Between people that want to live free and those that would submit if they get their WIC and stimulus checks and their rent paid.
.
Communism, or whatever it is being packaged as on the day, teaches people to ignore their allegiance to their family as well as their faith in God and to turn to atheism and materialism, and the programs and handouts offered by the State.
.
People eventually forget their freedom and accept the lot they’ve been given.
.
Trump, over the last four years, was able to prevent the progress of Socialism and government authoritarianism in America. The things he stands and stood for hindered that slide downwards — a movement that aimed to tear down and destroy, causing chaos in our nation. As he said, all that was standing in their way, was him!
.
.
That no longer is the case as President Trump, all but still in the game, is no longer the force he was.
.
That’s why we need a new leader and a group of men and women ready to take back what is rightfully ours.
.
That is why I am writing to you today, John. I believe you hold the key to taking our country back. We need you now more than ever.
.
Bonus piece from “The Intercept” to follow my opening statement on Biden’s warmongering.
.
What is it with all the new wars? or should I say, the re-igniting of old conflicts….
.
I wanted to elaborate a little bit about how Biden’s administration, like Bush’s at the start of the millennium, will try and use war and jingoism and misguided patriotism as a weapon to subdue the now relatively anti-war Right and use anti-Russian/anti-Syrian hatred (Assad and Putin both being homophobes who simply LOVE Trump, don’t ya know?) to rally the hate-filled Left.
.
Trump engaged in no wars for the past four years and this was met with tremendous support from grass-roots conservatives (not to be confused with the RINO elite running the GOP who have now been re-energized by Biden’s victory).
.
Enjoy.
‘As Democratic Elites Reunite With Neocons, the Party’s Voters Are Becoming Far More Militaristic and Pro-War Than Republicans’
Democrats once favored an end to Middle East wars. Reflecting their Trump-era ethos, Democrats are now their primary proponents.
Both GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of the country’s most reliable war supporters, and Hillary Clinton, who repeatedly criticized former President Barack Obama for insufficient hawkishness, condemned Trump’s decision in very similar terms, invoking standard war on terror jargon.
But while official Washington united in opposition, new polling data from Morning Consult/Politico shows that a large plurality of Americans support Trump’s Syria withdrawal announcement: 49 percent support to 33 percent opposition.
That’s not surprising given that Americans by a similarly large plurality agree with the proposition that “the U.S. has been engaged in too many military conflicts in places such as Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan for too long and should prioritize getting Americans out of harm’s way” far more than they agree with the pro-war view that “the U.S. needs to keep troops in places such as Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan to help support our allies fight terrorism and maintain our foreign-policy interests in the region.”
But what is remarkable about the new polling data on Syria is that the vast bulk of support for keeping troops there comes from Democratic Party voters, while Republicans and independents overwhelming favor their removal. The numbers are stark: Of people who voted for Clinton in 2016, only 26 percent support withdrawing troops from Syria, while 59 percent oppose it. Trump voters overwhelmingly support withdraw by 76 percent to 14 percent.
A similar gap is seen among those who voted Democrat in the 2018 midterm elections (28 percent support withdrawal while 54 percent oppose it), as opposed to the widespread support for withdrawal among 2018 GOP voters: 74 percent to 18 percent.
Identical trends can be seen on the question of Trump’s announced intention to withdraw half of the U.S. troops currently in Afghanistan, where Democrats are far more supportive of keeping troops there than Republicans and independents.
This case is even more stark since Obama ran in 2008 on a pledge to end the war in Afghanistan and bring all troops home. Throughout the Obama years, polling data consistently showed that huge majorities of Democrats favored a withdrawal of all troops from Afghanistan:
With Trump rather than Obama now advocating troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, all of this has changed. The new polling data shows far more support for troop withdrawal among Republicans and independents, while Democrats are now split or even opposed.
Among 2016 Trump voters, there is massive support for withdrawal: 81 percent to 11 percent; Clinton voters, however, oppose the removal of troops from Afghanistan by a margin of 37 percent in favor and 47 percent opposed.
This latest poll is far from aberrational. As the Huffington Post’s Ariel Edwards-Levy documented early this week, separate polling shows a similar reversal by Democrats on questions of war and militarism in the Trump era.
While Democrats were more or less evenly divided early last year on whether the U.S. should continue to intervene in Syria, all that changed once Trump announced his intention to withdraw, which provoked a huge surge in Democratic support for remaining.
“Those who voted for Democrat Clinton now said by a 42-point margin that the U.S. had a responsibility to do something about the fighting in Syria involving ISIS,” Edwards-Levy wrote, “while Trump voters said by a 16-point margin that the nation had no such responsibility.”
(Similar trends can be seen among GOP voters, whose support for intervention in Syria has steadily declined as Trump has moved away from his posture of the last two years — escalating bombings in both Syria and Iraq and killing far more civilians, as he repeatedly vowed to do during the campaign — to him returning to his other campaign pledge to remove troops from the region.)
This is, of course, not the first time that Democratic voters have wildly shifted their “beliefs” based on the party affiliation of the person occupying the Oval Office.
The party’s base spent the Bush-Cheney years denouncing war on terror policies, such as assassinations, drones, and Guantánamo as moral atrocities and war crimes, only to suddenly support those policies once they became hallmarks of the Obama presidency.
But what’s happening here is far more insidious. A core ethos of the anti-Trump #Resistance has become militarism, jingoism, and neoconservatism. Trump is frequently attacked by Democrats using longstanding Cold War scripts wielded for decades against them by the far right:
Trump is insufficiently belligerent with U.S. enemies; he’s willing to allow the Bad Countries to take over by bringing home U.S. soldiers; his efforts to establish less hostile relations with adversary countries is indicative of weakness or even treason.
At the same time, Democratic policy elites in Washington are once again formally aligning with neoconservatives, even to the point of creating joint foreign policy advocacy groups (a reunion that predated Trump). The leading Democratic Party think tank, the Center for American Progress, donated $200,000 to the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute and has multilevel alliances with warmongering institutions. By far the most influential liberal media outlet, MSNBC, is stuffed full of former Bush-Cheney officials, security state operatives, and agents, while even the liberal stars are notably hawkish (a decade ago, long before she went as far down the pro-war and Cold Warrior rabbit hole that she now occupies, Rachel Maddow heralded herself as a “national security liberal” who was “all about counterterrorism”).
….JdN: My comments
There is a long history of Democrat presidents starting major and catastrophic wars:
— Democrat Woodrow Wilson, blackmailed over erotic letters to a mistress, got us into the insane World War I (after promising the opposite!)
— Democrat and crypto-jew Frank Rosenfeld got us into World War Two to make the world safe for jews and communists (also after promising not to)
.
.
.
The [Democrat] party’s base spent the Bush-Cheney years denouncing war on terror policies, such as assassinations, drones, and Guantánamo as moral atrocities and war crimes, only to suddenly support those policies once they became hallmarks of the Obama presidency.
.
It struck me in reading the 1936 volume of Das Dritte Reich, the official record of the NSDAP and, after 1922, NS Germany, how much was accomplished by NOT having political enemies around opposing and vetoing every good program that Hitler wanted and his country needed to escape the horrible Great Depression.
Not only was the country broke and in the depths of an American-Wall-Street-caused economic crisis, but the gigantic Soviet Union was right next door to Germany, plus an ultra-hostile Poland, Czechoslovakia and France!
Scandalously, France signed in 1936 a mutual defense treaty with the blood-dripping Stalin!
Had there still been the other political parties around, they would have screamed to the gullible Germans how Bad Mustache Man had upset the nice Soviets!
Btw, there were lots of false-flag attacks even back then, 85 years ago.
The outrageous Treaty of Versailles had temporarily given a coal-rich chunk of Germany, the Saarland, to France for 15 years, after which a referendum was to be held there as to which country the Saarlanders preferred to belong to.
As the referendum approached, Hitler gave strict orders, which were obeyed because he was the absolute leader, and unopposed, that there were to be no incidents of any kind.
So French agents took to tearing down at night the “Vote to Stay with France” signs! But no one believed NS activists did it, because everyone knew that Adolf Hitler had given strict orders to play by the rules.
The Führer even ordered that on election day, ‘at the voting station speak only when spoken to, show your ID, vote, and leave without saying one single word.”
And so the League of Nations commissioner was forced to admit the election had been totally fair.
And 90% voted to rejoin Germany.
to a NATIONAL SOCIALIST Germany. 😉
Shortly thereafter, Catholic churches in Germany began to be vandalized.
Was it Jesus-hating heathens, SS, or Stormtroopers?
Leave a Reply