Extremely good article on Tolkien, Lewis, and the death of Britain; Tolkien’s papers reveal he was “one of us”

Spread the love
THIS ENGLISH LAD STRIPS NAKED ON THE STREETS OF LONDON ON COMMAND OF THIS NEGRO, shaming all his ancestors! (2011 riots https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_England_riots)

.

white-young-man-forced-to-strip

.

England before the Jews was an invincible race of conquerors!

cartoon-english-helmeted-soldiers-1650

.

Negroes ordered her to undress too. Black Supremacy ” on the streets of London!

englishwoman-stripped-by-black-rioters

.

No vengeance for the 1,400 English children raped by Muslims in Rotherham, England! Children threatened with being burned alive and anally raped!

.

muslim-paki-rotherham-threatens-bf.

main-street-rotherham-child-abuse-pakistani-abusers

.

muslim-paki-rape-blond-girl-cop-arrests-parents

.

white-blonde-little-girl-tries-to-pray

.

crying little blond girl

.

In fact, pedophilia is now justified!

brit-politicians-defend-pedophilia

…..THE PREDICTABLE DEATH OF POST-CHRISTIAN BRITAIN

This royal throne of kings, this sceptered isle, This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or as moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,

This blessèd plot, this earth, this realm, this
England,
This nurse, this teeming womb of royal kings,
Feared by their breed and famous by their birth,
Renownèd for their deeds as far from home
For Christian service and true chivalry
As is the sepulcher in stubborn Jewry
Of the world’s ransom, blessèd Mary’s son,
This land of such dear souls, this dear dear land,
Dear for her reputation through the world,
Is now leased out ”I die pronouncing it ”
Like to a tenement or pelting farm.
England, bound in with the triumphant sea,
Whose rocky shore beats back the envious siege
Of wat’ry Neptune, is now bound in with shame,
With inky blots and rotten parchment bonds.
That England that was wont to conquer others Hath made a shameful conquest of itself.
Ah, would the scandal vanish with my life,
How happy then were my ensuing death!

Richard II 2.1.45

As Britain copes with yet another terror attack it is becoming increasingly clear that ordinary citizens are unable to process or comprehend what is happening to their country. (In May of 2017 the most current attack is the Manchester bombing of Ariana Grande’s concert. Britain does not look to have a shortage of jihadis anytime soon, so feel free to insert the name of the most recent attack whenever you read this.) All the vigils and gestures that seem so hollow from a nationalist perspective apparently still placate the masses, but are intentionally devoid of any spiritual content. Even the nationalist responses to Manchester tend to center on Enoch Powell’s Rivers of Blood speech. As prescient as Powell was, he approached immigration as a politician and criticized it as a bad policy that would result in violence. Government policy is itself a result of changing social mores, and the mindset of Western elites was bent on replacing white, Christian culture long before political action was taken to facilitate demographic suicide. Alan Burns noted in his In Defence of Colonies that the British policy was prioritizing the colonized peoples above the interests of the Empire as early as the 1920’s, though these attitudes did not spill over into public consciousness until midcentury.

“In many cases ‘anti-colonialism’ is merely a cover for intense racial feeling, a colour prejudice in reverse which reflects the resentment of the darker peoples against the past domination of the world by European nations. In all cases ‘anti-colonialism’ is based on emotion rather than on reason, on misconceptions instead of a correct appraisal of the facts, and a distinguished American jurist has pointed out that ‘we are flooded with vague concepts, like “sovereignty”, “democracy”, “rights of small nations”, “equality before the law”, put forward as though they had some definite content.’ In Defence of Colonies; Introduction

Leaving aside the subversive left that actively promotes Islam over Western Civilization and the dimwit left that is so easily mocked online for not jumping to conclusions about the probable identity of a suicide bomber, we are left with the platitudinous normie who attends a vigil, dubs some first responder hero-of-the-day, and vows to keep living his empty, materialistic life “so the terrorists don’t win”. Citizens of this sort follow a preset ritual in response to terrorism, a ritual directed by celebrities and cultural trendsetters that circumscribes the words, actions, and charitable giving of the crowd and channels grief and anger into impotent but socially acceptable expressions. Sadly, in secularized Britain many of these unthinking conformists fancy themselves educated freethinkers and look down on their Catholic ancestors as ignorant bigots controlled by priests and the liturgy, despite the fact that any illiterate 12th century peasant could predict Britain’s current troubles after a five minute walk through modern London and could also give Theresa May better advise on handling Muslims than the combined American, British and French intelligence and diplomatic services.

Modern Britons have been conditioned to place their faith in abstract words like democracy but to mistrust any metaphysical or spiritual interpretation of history because the elites understand that only a spiritual revival can sustain opposition to their materialistic, globalist agenda. The paganism of Africa and the semitic faith of the Middle East are temporary cudgels that the British government uses to break what remains of white, Christian culture. Thoughtful writers like J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis explored the spiritual battle for the West in fiction decades before deadly levels of immigration were foisted on the British people.

It is frustrating for those of us who can see Europe’s suicidal tendencies to try and revive the Western tradition of combating Islam and barbarism generally. Every right of center commentator has a favorite book that illuminates the modern European dilemma. Submission and Camp of the Saints shed light on the outsiders imposing their culture on Europe, while 1984 and Brave New World reveal the measures Western governments will take to silence their own dissident citizens. Since I have an above average interest in literature I will pretend as I tout my own favorite books that a non-trivial number of citizens still read anything longer than an email. Really that liberal, freethinking British agnostic is today as aliterate as his ancestors were illiterate, but at least the memes that will nudge him to the right should be based on the unabridged wisdom of the ages.

The Lord of the Rings is a fascinating expression of Tolkien’s vision of pre-Christian epic history. In addition to his generally reactionary views on technology, aristocracy, and hierarchy, Tolkien gives a blueprint for the subtle dangers of prosperity in his chapter on the scouring of the Shire. At the end of their adventures the hobbits, with whom Tolkien personally identified, return to their homeland only to find it overrun with invaders of a foreign race who had been at first invited in. The invaders changed the culture of the Shire for their own benefit, using more and more force to suppress reaction from the natives. All this came about after the political leadership of the Shire was co-opted by Saruman, a member of an ancient though not numerous race distinct from both natives and invaders, an internationalist who dazzled and confounded everyone with his verbal acuity and subtle reasoning. Under his direction traditional structures are torn down and replaced with the uniform ugliness of modern architecture. Saruman literally uproots the Shire any way he can, destroying homes and cutting down ancient trees just to make the landscape unrecognizable. The scouring of the shire is often taken as a warning against the collectivism of the Soviet Union prevalent when Tolkien was writing, and to the extent that Soviet collectivism was materialist this is a valid interpretation. The Lord of the Rings as a whole though is a mythic history about spiritual struggle, not an allegory of 20th century history. Tolkien feared the subversion of all the good, homely fruits of peace, and he believed the English to be particularly susceptible to the lie that prosperity is infinitely extendable.

The Scouring of the Shire is rarely selected as a favorite passage among Tolkien fans, but it should have special significance for reactionaries and nationalists. Unlike the superficial realism of George Martin’s Game of Thrones in which every good thing is pointlessly crushed to death, Tolkien’s world is redeemable, but the cost of its redemption is steep. Not everyone gets to go home happy; Frodo can save the Shire but never again be at peace there. Tolkien explicitly defended the Scouring of the Shire as an integral part of his story because the fight for civilization is not only the task of kings and knights but also of farmers and housewives.

‘Who are you, and what d’you think you’re doing?’ said the ruffian- leader.
Farmer Cotton looked at him slowly. ‘I was just going to ask you that,’ he said. ‘This isn’t your country, and you’re not wanted.’

Unsurprisingly, this revolutionary message was not depicted in The Lord of the Rings films. The structure of Peter Jackson’s epic quest is more amenable to the fantasies spun by military recruiters. If you want to have an adventure, join the Marines and go “over there” to release all your violent energy; when you come back the homeland will be just the same as you left it, we promise!

‘This is worse than Mordor!’ said Sam. ‘Much worse in a way. It comes home to you, as they say; because it is home, and you remember it before it was all ruined.’

The destructive power of the centralized state that Tolkien attributes to the malice of Saruman is examined by C.S. Lewis as well. In Is Progress Possible? Lewis considers the result of scientific advances being put at the disposal of the state. Lewis holds a very organic view of culture in which the virtues of Europe are connected inherently with the age long traditions of Christendom, and the meddling of the state for the purpose of social improvement is most likely to destroy the moorings of our civilization without any guarantee of a superior, or even adequate replacement.

I believe a man is happier, and happy in a richer way, if he has ˜the freeborn mind’. But I doubt whether he can have this without economic independence, which the new society is abolishing. For economic independence allows an education not controlled by Government; and in adult life it is the man who needs, and asks, nothing of Government who can criticise its acts and snap his fingers at its ideology. Read Montaigne; that’s the voice of a man with his legs under his own table, eating the mutton and turnips raised on his own land. Who will talk like that when the State is everyone’s schoolmaster and employer? Admittedly, when man was untamed, such liberty belonged only to the few. I know. Hence the horrible suspicion that our only choice is between societies with few freemen and societies with none… To live his life in his own way, to call his house his castle, to enjoy the fruits of his own labour, to educate his children as his conscience directs, to save for their prosperity after his death ” these are wishes deeply ingrained in white and civilised man. Their realization is almost as necessary to our virtues as to our happiness. From their total frustration disastrous results both moral and psychological might follow.1

Lewis explores the potential disaster of social engineering in That Hideous Strength, the third novel of his space trilogy. That Hideous Strength is an idiosyncratic, genre-bending dystopian science fiction fairytale with a happy ending that places all the themes Lewis worked out with his essays, poetry, and scholarly writing into a narrative filled with references to renaissance literature, the House of Stuart, and Arthurian legends.

The transhumanist National Institute of Coordinated Experiments seeks to preserve consciousness without any organic bodies, almost like Mark Zuckerberg’s attempt to transfer all of human interaction into Virtual Reality. The first part of the NICE agenda requires breaking down traditional human emotions through the use of news propaganda, modern art and architecture, and the normalization of every sort of degeneracy. The opponents of the NICE are the modern remnants of King Arthur’s court who are aided by a reawakened Merlin. Few passages of Lewis’s work encapsulate the sickening realization that undergirds neoreaction quite like the moment when Merlin learns that all he called good is now called evil and that every part of the society he remembers has been destroyed or perverted.

This Saxon king of yours who sits at Windsor, now ”is there no help in him?”

“He has no power in this matter.”

“Then is he not weak enough to be overthrown?”

“I have no wish to overthrow him. He is the king. He was crowned and anointed by the Archbishop. In the order of Logres I may be Pendragon, but in the order of Britain I am the King’s man.”

“Is it, then, his great men ”the counts and legates and bishops ”who do the evil and he does not know of it?”

“It is ”though they are not exactly the sort of great men you have in mind.”

“And are we not big enough to meet them in plain battle?”

“We are four men, some women, and a bear.”

“I saw the time when Logres was only myself and one man and two boys, and one of those was a churl. Yet we conquered.”

“It could not be done now. They have an engine called the Press whereby the people are deceived. We should die without even being heard of.”

“But what of the true clerks? Is there no help in them? It cannot be that all your priests and bishops are corrupted.”

“The Faith itself is torn in pieces since your day and speaks with a divided voice. Even if it were made whole, the Christians are but a
tenth part of the people. There is no help there.”

“Then let us seek help from over sea. Is there no Christian prince in Neustria or Ireland or Benwick who would come in and cleanse Britain if he were called?”

“There is no Christian prince left. These other countries are even as Britain, or else sunk deeper still in the disease.”

“Then we must go higher. We must go to him whose office it is to put down tyrants and give life to dying kingdoms. We must call on the Emperor.”

“There is no Emperor.”

“No Emperor . . .” began Merlin, and then his voice died away. He sat still for some minutes wrestling with a world which he had never
envisaged. Presently he said, “A thought comes into my mind and I do not know whether it is good or evil. But because I am the High Council of Logres I will not hide it from you. This is a cold age in which I have
awaked. If all this west part of the world is apostate, might it not be lawful, in our great need, to look further . . . beyond Christendom?
Should we not find some even among the heathen who are not wholly corrupt? There were tales in my day of some such: men who knew not the articles of our most holy Faith but who worshipped God as they could and
acknowledged the Law of Nature. Sir, I believe it would be lawful to seek help even there ”beyond Byzantium. It was rumoured also that there was knowledge in those lands ”an Eastern circle and wisdom that came West from Numinor. I know not where ”Babylon, Arabia, or Cathay. You said your
ships had sailed all round the earth, above and beneath.”

Ransom shook his head. “You do not understand,” he said. “The poison was brewed in these West lands but it has spat itself everywhere by now. However far you went you would find the machines, the crowded cities,
the empty thrones, the false writings, the barren beds: men maddened with false promises and soured with true miseries, worshipping the iron works of their own hands, cut off from Earth their mother and from the Father in Heaven. You might go East so far that East became West and you returned to Britain across the great Ocean, but even so you would not have come out anywhere into the light. The shadow of one dark wing is
over all Tellus.”

“Is it, then, the end?” asked Merlin.

Mercifully Tolkien and Lewis died before the terrible fate of England became clear. In their most fantastical writings neither man imagined the specific depravity of post-Christian Britain, with its enforced equality, transgender rights and Muslims taking over churches. The invasive collectivism of Tolkien and the scientific materialism of Lewis are less horrific than the squalor of reality. Most modern British cultural productions, from Sherlock to James Bond, are desperately anachronistic in their depiction of quiet country estates, dedicated public servants, and monumental architecture. The uninformed viewer might get the mistaken impression that these things are still statistically representative of the British populace. The notion that politicians would intentionally turn the sceptred isle into a third world pit just to spite the working class was unimaginable 70 years ago and is not common knowledge even now.

Embarrassingly for their many low-church Protestant fans, both Tolkien and Lewis have complex views of spiritual revitalization. Tolkien’s hobbits are awakened by the earthy spirit of kinship, not any formal religion. That Hideous Strength is at one level a novel about sex and the virile vitality of Christianity that was so offensive to feminists and is now unmentionable even among Christians. Tolkien and Lewis held the orthodox opinions of the Roman Catholic and Anglican churches and were educated in the literature and philosophy of the European tradition. They knew that the spiritual revival that saves Britain must be Christian, but desiccated, formulaic Calvinism will not suffice. The Christianity of Shakespeare, able to comprehend and enjoy the pre-Christian spirits and traditions, is still alive and ready to rule again.

Notes

  1. Somewhere between being published in God in the Dock and appearing on libertarianchristians.com the word ‘white’ was removed from this quotation. What a surprise. ↩

http://libertarianchristians.com/2013/07/31/is-progress-possible/

[end]

.

.

…..Tolkien’s papers reveal he was “one of us”

  JRR Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, as his private papers show, was IMHO really about (drumroll) ” the Khazars; he said it through fiction to dog-whistle his message past them.

Please bear with me as I make my case. :slight_smile:

¦..Famous Hindu guru summons Whites to their duty

Excellent content in this video ¦. It is rare to see a dark-skinned Indian (a guru) directly call White Europeans and Americans Aryans and remind them that their ancestors once gloriously spread culture and good order throughout the world. (The speaker was the leader of the Hare Krishnas.)

All the swastikas will impress you. 😉

I know for a fact from someone who attended the Maharishi University of Management in Fairfield, Iowa, (https://www.mum.edu that the guru Maharish Mahesh Yogi (who became famous because of the Beatles and other things ¦)

¦.privately thought Hitler a very great man, and the Maharishi also perfectly understood the gravity of the Jewish problem.

The Big Jews, these gurus know, are reincarnated demons, as Jesus said in John 8:44.

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

This is something that the American clairvoyant Edgar Cayce, btw, also said, but in a book his followers which never dared to publish.

The followers of evil, in Hinduism, are “mlecchas,” violent subhumans who choose the dark, left-handed path. (In Latin, the word for left is “sinister.”)

J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings is about the same thing. Tolkien woke up to the whole truth in the 1950s (he was anti-Hitler in the 1930s and ’40s, then saw how Britain changed through colored migration AFTER the war), but he had to cloak it as adventure novels to get SOME of the truth published ¦ ¦

He was a WWI veteran and was a devout Roman Catholic from an era when that meant awareness of who the real enemy of Christianity was.

You know, I was never “into” LOTR, but when I saw the ring of gold as the source of all evil ¦heh-heh ¦ 🙂

If Christianity is failing Western society, culture and civilisation “ we need to go back to our roots and core cultural identity and beliefs. I think Tolkien knew this and provides plenty of analogy in his works for us.

In his “The Silmarillion,” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Silmarillion), on which he labored for decades, Tolkien shows he was far deeper than just some fantasy storyteller ¦.or some armchair nerd pseudo-warrior (Tolkien served at the front in WWI). He was actually explaining the multiverse, that is, the multidimensional universe.

The Silmarillion “ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My take on Tolkien is that by the 1950s he really understood that the Jewish banksters were the locus of evil in our time and that they would in the end send a kind of Orc armies ” the zombyized humans, bred and trained only to fight and die for their masters ” to destroy all human freedom and virtue, the “Aryans” (people of noble character) of all races, and create a brutal slave planet on our corpses, and so we who are aware have no choice but ¦. to fight and ¦ to win.

He was also an incredible linguist (so I have a special affinity for him) and possessed a vast knowledge of Celtic, Greco-Roman, Old Testament, New Testament, Norse and Finnish myths.

By personal leanings I hate fantasy, and want ACTION in the real world. But now I see that JRR Tolkien was stirring the embers of our heroism in us ¦. and communicating right past the Jews in Hollywood and in the book-publishing world his message that the good must fight the evil, or else!

Think about what his novels deal with:
¦. the Lust-ers after the Power of Gold (= the golden ring) ” now guess who they are 😉

¦ and their Orc-like followers.

*** on Tolkien

(If you can stand the heavy-metal band Metallica, here are some GREAT clips from various parts of the movie “The Lord of the Rings” with Orcs, evil warriors, and nordic heroes and elves, and the innocent yet brave Hobbits)

Saruman is the jew-like servant of Lord Sauron, who is the Devil himself. It amazes me how many WNs do not view EVERYTHING Tolkien was doing as anti-Jewish and pro-Nordic. But to get published, he HAD to disguise it as “fantasy.”

Saruman

In the end, this vile being, who SYMBOLIZES THE JEWS, IS DEFEATED.

Wiki:

In The Two Towers (1954), the second volume of the story, [Saruman] is the main antagonist. Orcs from Saruman’s army in search of the Ring attack Frodo and his companions. Following Saruman’s orders to capture hobbits, they carry off two of Frodo’s closest friends, Merry and Pippin. The two escape into Fangorn Forest, where they meet the Ents, protectors of the trees, who are outraged at the widespread felling of trees by Saruman’s orcs.[4]

Meanwhile, Saruman’s army has invaded the land of Rohan, [ROHAN MEANS GERMANY] with the effect of preventing the Riders of Rohan from joining the fight against Sauron. Having betrayed Sauron by attempting unsuccessfully to seize the Ring for himself, Saruman is ruined when the Riders of Rohan defeat his army and Merry and Pippin prompt the Ents to destroy Isengard. Saruman himself is not directly involved, and only appears again in chapter 10, “The Voice of Saruman”, by which time he is trapped in Orthanc. He fails in his attempt to negotiate with the Rohirrim and with Gandalf, and rejects Gandalf’s conditional offer to let him go free. Gandalf casts him out of the White Council and the order of the wizards, and breaks Saruman’s staff.[5]

Saruman makes his final appearance at the end of the last volume, The Return of the King (1955), after Sauron’s defeat. After persuading the Ents to release him from Orthanc, he travels north on foot, apparently reduced to begging. He is accompanied by his servant Grma Wormtongue, whom he beats and curses.[6] When they reach the Shire, Saruman’s agents both Hobbits and Menhave already taken it over and started a destructive process of modernization.

Saruman governs the Shire in secret under the name of Sharkey until the events of chapter 8 (“The Scouring of the Shire”) in which Frodo and his companions return and lead a rebellion, defeating the intruders and exposing Saruman’s role. He tries to kill Frodo, who subdues him and allows him to leave. As he turns to leave, he mocks the long-suffering Wormtongue, who snaps and cuts his throat before being felled by Hobbit arrows.[7]

¦..This superb article by White South African Stephen Goodson shows what Tolkien really believed

¦..Stephen Goodson of South Africa on JRR Tolkien

[source: http://www.spearhead.co.uk/0208-sg.html]

The Mythos of J. R. R. Tolkien

Stephen Goodson explores the sympathies of the author of The Lord of the Rings

According to a survey by the Folio Society in 1997, as well as a poll by Waterstone’s, the booksellers, in January of that year, The Lord of the Rings was voted readers’ “favourite book of all time.” The recent filming of the book has popularised it once more, and stimulated speculation as to what fuelled this extraordinary work.

While many aficionados are content to treat The Lord of the Rings as an epic fantasy, some have detected an underlying repugnance for the industrialisation of the countryside and the damage of total war.

In June 1997, Ross Shimmon, chief executive of the Library Association, commented:-

 It’s astonishing that The Lord of the Rings has this impact. The idea of a parallel world ¦ I wonder whether it’s something to do with trying to make sense of the world around us.

Candour reader

A 20-year subscription to the patriotic journal Candour and a faithful preservation of its 24 volume, may well provide some clues as to what were Tolkien’s innermost thoughts, ideas and beliefs.

Candour was founded by A. K. Chesterton, a cousin of G. K. Chesterton, as a successor to Truthmagazine, of which he had previously been Deputy Editor.


Here is the website today: http://www.candour.org.uk/

A sample issue and cover:


Chesterton, a distinguished veteran of two world wars,

had earlier edited Oswald Mosley’s [Fascist] publications in the Thirties.

In 1954 he established the “League of Empire Loyalists,” whose antics and interventions at Tory meetings proved to be a constant source of irritation and embarrassment to both Eden and Macmillan. In 1967 the League merged with the old “British National Party” (not to be confused with the present party of the same name) and the Racial Preservation Society to form the National Front, with the Greater Britain Movement joining the merger a short time later. Chesterton assumed the role of leader.

In 1973, Tolkien’s copies of Candour were sold out of his estate. In 1997, I inherited these newsletters from Chesterton’s secretary, Moyna Traill-Smith. The quotations from Candour which follow have all been underlined by Tolkien with a red biro [American: ballpoint pen].

Empire tragedy

The dissolution of the British Empire was viewed by Tolkien as a tragedy, which would have permanent negative consequences for its indigenous populations:-

Africa is not peopled by Black Europeans, but it is a continent full of tribes mentally and morally at the dawn of history.

Self-government does not mean democracy “ Liberia and Abyssinia are two warning lights. African hegemony would lead to the suicide of the White community in East and Central Africa and to the ruin of African hopes of sustained progress. (3/10 August 1956, page 44)

Tolkien was disillusioned about the effectiveness of modern democracy, and considered both the media and high finance to be inimical to its success:-

The concentration of the power of the Press has long since made a mockery of whatever degree of informed democracy we may have once known ¦ (10 February 1956, page 50)

The true equation is democracy = government by world financiers.

The main mark of modern governments is that we do not know who governs, de facto any more than de jure. We see the politician and not his backer; still less the backer of the backer; or, what is most important of all, the banker of the backer.

Throned above all, in a manner without parallel in all past, is the veiled prophet of finance, swaying all men living by a sort of magic, and delivering oracles in a language not understood of the people. (13 July 1956, page 12)

Monetary reformer

It was in the field of monetary reform that Tolkien displayed his most passionate concern. His indignation about the evil of usury “ the creation of money out of nothing and then lending it out at interest “ is reflected repeatedly:-

There should only be one source of money: one fountainhead from which flows the nation’s blood to vitalise commerce and industry, ensure economic equity and justice and safeguard the welfare of the people ¦ In other words, it has always been and still is our contention that the prerogative of creating and issuing the money of the nation should be restored to the State. (3/10 August 1956, page 48)

Utilising the above background, a brief exegesis of The Lord of the Rings may be attempted.

The centre of all evil is the Dark Lord Sauron, who has enslaved the people of Middle Earth through the rings of power. There are seven rings for the dwarf lords, five for the elven kings, nine for mortal men, and one to rule and bind them all in darkness and slavery forever.

These gold rings were forged in the fires of Mount Doom and are symbolic of the central banks and their monopolistic powers, which enable them to create money out of nothing and lend it out at interest to the gullible people. With their unlimited financial power, they are able to control the mass media and spellbind the general public with their propaganda.

But eventually good prevails over evil and the Ringwraiths, the Orcs, and the Uruk Hai monsters are defeated.

Background

So who was John Ronald Reuel Tolkien? Did he support the NF [National Front]? Probably not in any meaningful way, but indisputably he was sympathetic to its anti-immigration and anti-Common Market policies, having endorsed Chesterton’s views over two decades.

There is little doubt that Tolkien was a patriot, and that his conviction that the civilising effects of the British Empire were a blessing to be enjoyed by all has been proven correct. The torment of death, debt and destruction, which Africa has subsequently endured bears regrettable testimony to that fact.

Above everything else Tolkien may be judged as an ardent supporter of monetary reform. He understood that money is not a form of wealth, but a medium for the exchange of goods and services. He sought social justice through the adoption of an honest money system, which would distribute the benefits of the technological age to all mankind, and provide a secure basis for a future of progress and prosperity.

Tolkien could have written a treatise on political economy, and, if published, it would in all likelihood have achieved only a limited circulation.

By employing a powerful allegory, he has subconsciously embraced and influenced the minds of untold millions with his mythos.

Stephen Goodson is leader of the Abolition of Income Tax, and Usury Party in South Africa, information about which can be obtained from its website at www.abolishtax.org.za.

[end]

It was, in my opinion, his brilliant strategy to tell “mere stories” ” USING THE JEWS’ OWN HOLLYWOOD AND BOOK PUBLISHING ” that got the message to those of us who are ready to awaken ” the message: JEWS RULE THE WORLD BY MONEY TO CREATE A JEW MASTER/GOY SLAVE PLANET!

THE RING OF GOLD WITH THE WEIRD WRITING INSIDE ¦.. Of course, Tolkien could not put Hebrew letters on it ¦. 😉

Tolkien’s ancestors were German, by the way, who had emigrated to England. Tolkien was just the German name “Tollkühn,” which means “bold” (literally “mad courage” 😉 )

But Tolkien was not just bold ” but also very crafty. 😉

As an English soldier, he experienced the horrors of WWI trench warfare and poison gas. In the 1920s he went on to become a world-renowned professor of Germanic and Indo-European linguistics and mythology at OXFORD 1925-59. In the 1950s he saw the non-White immigration into Britain and THEN he finally “got it.” (He had actually said some anti-Hitler stuff in the 1930s, probably to save his professorship.)

But Tolkien stayed “undercover” about it all to the end, and instead wrote mega-bestselling novels about Aryan heroism. The three “Lord of the Ring” movies alone have had TWO BILLION viewers!


Now we see that via chemtrails, fluoride, cell phones affecting young brains, and the spread of homosexuality and pedophilia that there are now hundreds of millions of WHITE zombies of the NWO, many of them, with white skin but a black heart. (And there are some non-Whites who are noble, and would support us against the Jews if we step up to the plate and assume leadership!)

Going back to the video, the photos of so many INDIANS using the swastika is also refreshing and should be a wake-up call to those of Aryan blood. These dark ones await our awakening! Soon this situation will come literally true: demon-led armies will gather against the true Aryans, the Noble Ones, and they are called to eradicate the wicked, cleanse the earth, and then govern it wisely for the good of all and make our planet again a beautiful green and blue jewel among the worlds. WE in a previous life did the glories depicted from 1933 to 1945. WE are called to do it again!

¦.A reaction to this “Lord of the Rings” blog

Dear John,

I already knew about Tolkien. He was speaking of the goodness of white people and the West, and wrote the famous line in the final Lord of the Rings,

“By all that you hold dear, I bid you stand, men of the West!”

He pointed up the tyrannical ways of eastern peoples that he called “Calormene” (colored men), looking mainly at Turks. And in one of his books, probably The Book of Lost Tales, he declared that the noble race with fairy blood had sunken by mingling its blood with lower races and species. I am glad that you will be making your big move, and wish you all success. May the powers of the sun be with you, my friend.


.
.
¦..GREATEST SONG OF THE 1970s?

“WHO’LL STOP THE RAIN?”

The lyrics by lead singer John Fogerty about the “tower” refer to the “Lord of the Rings” cycle of novels by Tolkien (who was huge in the 1960s), ands to the ring of gold, to the tower of the evil Lord Sauron, and thus indirectly to THE JEWS.

.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1qGB4d-7nw


“Five-Year Plans and New Deals” refer to the fake social programs of both communism and capitalism, both shell games of the JEWS. If you never understood this song, then now you can doubly enjoy it by “getting it” for the first time! 🙂

“Who’ll Stop The Rain”

Long as I remember,
The rain been comin’ down.
Clouds of myst’ry pourin’
Confusion on the ground.
Good men through the ages
Tryin’ to find the sun.
And I wonder,
Still I wonder
Who’ll stop the rain?

I went down [to] Virginia,
Seekin’ shelter from the storm.
Caught up in the fable,
I watched the tower grow.

Five-Year Plans [communist/Stalin] and New Deals [Roosevelt/Truman]
Wrapped in golden chains.
And I wonder,
Still I wonder
Who’ll stop the rain?

Heard the singers playin’,
How we cheered for more?
The crowd had rushed together
Tryin’ to keep warm.

Still the rain kept pourin’,
Fallin’ on my ears.
And I wonder,
Still I wonder
Who’ll stop the rain?

 

.

.

¦..Contact and support

John de Nugent

306 S. Steel Street

Ontanagon MI 49953

+1 (906) 884-6689 😉

VK.com https://vk.com/id351111810

Skype: John de Nugent (Ontonagon)

JOHN_DENUGENT@YAHOO.COM

THEJOHNDENUGENT@GMAIL.COM

Need secrecy? Then start a Hushmail.com

or safe_mail.net account and then send me @yahoo.com

your new secret email address.

  Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/john.denugent.3 

Twitter at John de Nugent @johndenugentESA

Letters from supporters

2 Comments

  1. The things those jews say and want to teach and condition us with just arent normal. They must have demons inside them, and also outside them helping them to such extremes that they seem to be hypnotic on our people.
    J

  2. Here is more proof that the Jews’ black and brown feral pets will eat them, too. Note the last name of the college professor who now fears for his life on campus – he’s a Jew named Bret Weinstein whom the 70-IQ black “students” just see as being a “white racist.” The fact that he’s Jewish is likely the only reason this story got any traction in the {{{media}}} – if he was a white Gentile, no one in the Jewish-owned media would care:

    https://nypost.com/2017/05/31/college-melts-down-over-plan-for-white-people-free-day-on-campus

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*