…..Tara Reade, who in 2020 accused Joe Biden of sexual assault in 1993, defects to Russia
I have blogged often on this case and how even ultra-libtard Mika Brzezinski (daughter of the late russophobe and US imperialist Zbigniew), who was a strong foe in 2016 and 2020 of Donald Trump, along with her equally woke husband, Joe Scarborough, on MSNBC, showed in a video that she believed Tara Reade, i.e. the feminism-promoting hypocrite Joe Biden raped his own employee.
And now this:
Former Senate staffer who made claim in 2020 appears on Russian media alongside convicted Russian agent in US Maria Butina
Martin Pengelly in New York, Tue 30 May 2023 17.52 EDT
[source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/30/tara-reade-defects-russia-biden]
Tara Reade, a former Senate staffer who in 2020 accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, has said she had defected to Russia.
“I’m still kind of in a daze a bit but I feel very good,” Reade told Sputnik, a Russian press outlet supportive of President Vladimir Putin, while sitting with Maria Butina, a convicted Russian agent jailed in the US but now a member of parliament in Russia.
“I feel very surrounded by protection and safety,” Reade said on Tuesday.
Now 59, Reade was a staffer for Biden when he was a US senator from Delaware.
In 2020, as Biden ran for the Democratic presidential nomination, she claimed that in 1993, in a Senate corridor, he pushed her against a wall and assaulted her. Biden repeatedly denied the accusation.
At her press appearance in Russia, Reade was described as a “writer, publicist and former aide to Joe Biden”.
Sitting next to Butina, Reade said: “I just really so appreciate Maria and everyone who’s been giving me [protection] at a time when it’s been very difficult to know if I’m safe or not.
“I just didn’t want to walk home and walk into a cage [jail/prison] or be killed, which is basically my two choices.”
Reade recently considered testifying before US House Republicans seeking to use committees to attack Biden and his family.
The decision to defect to Russia, she told Sputnik, “was very difficult. I’m not an impulsive person. I really take my time and sort of analyse data points.
“And from what I could see based on the cases and based on what was happening and sort of the push for them to not want me to testify, I felt that while [the 2024] election is gearing up and there’s so much at stake, I’m almost better off here and just being safe. My dream is to live in both places, but it may be that I only live in this place, and that’s OK.”
Biden is running for re-election. As president, he has helped maintain international support for Ukraine as it fights invading Russian forces.
Reade said:
“To my Russian brothers and sisters, I’m sorry right now that American elites are choosing to have such an aggressive stance. Just know that most American citizens do want to be friends and hope that we can have unity again.
“I am enjoying my time in Moscow, and I feel very at home.”
.
.
…..Spiritual reading for May 31
It is possible that you will find yourself dealing with emotional highs and lows, maybe even the sense that you are freeing, lifting upward, and then that you are impossibly grounded, unable to do more than slog through your daily activities. Highs and lows of many sorts. Keep your eyes open to see if and how this might manifest in your life.
When you swing into this kind of energy, it is important to keep balancing, breathing and bringing your awareness to the earth in order not to topple in one direction or another. These are always good things to do, but perhaps more essential to your ability to navigate the events of a day when things feel topsy-turvy.
The trick, as always, is to stay connected to your higher awareness. To avoid being sucked into any vortices, whether they hold despair or ecstasy. Tastes of each are fine, but don’t lose yourself in them. These strong emotional states can be of great value and you can work with them, live with them and learn from them in many situations — but only when you remain firmly grounded in your own center and mastery.
Nature helps with this, so immerse yourself in the natural world if that is a possibility. Let the stately and impassive pace of the trees and the stones help you slow down if you are moving too fast or going too high.
Let the vibrance and pulsating life force of the smaller animals and insects remind you of the tremendous joy and lightness of simple being if you are feeling weighed down.
As we said earlier, breath is of the utmost importance — connecting yourself to the rest of the physical world, and to the etheric as well, all through your breath. Pay attention particularly. You will be able to observe and learn much, we think.
It might easily happen that knowing all this, you still find yourself in the middle of an intense state you did not notice getting lost in. That is okay. Like any meditation, what you are needing to do is just to return again and again to the truth. But the illusion can be most intriguing, seductive. So don’t be surprised if you end up having some emotional adventures despite your best efforts. Simply put them in perspective and move on.
If you can find a way to be outdoors, in nature or surrounded by people whose energy suits you, enjoy the experience today. There is a lot of sweetness around if you can stay in the middle. Look for that, and content yourself with it. For the moment, it is the goal and the ideal.
We send all our love.
.
.
……Nordic aliens were “beautiful people and compassionate”
Source: https://www.blueblurrylines.com/2018/10/jessie-roestenburgs-1954-ufo-encounter.html
In 1976, Hugh Burnett was preparing a UFO documentary for the BBC, and he approached Charles Bowen and Gordon Creighton of Flying Saucer Review. They gave him the contact information for Jessie Roestenburg. The documentary was titled Out of this World, and it was first broadcast May 10, 1977 on BBC 1. It’s largely responsible for reviving interest in the case, and today, most people are probably familiar with Jessie Roestenburg’s story via the YouTube clip of her from the program. It’s often shared with comments noting how genuine, sincere and credible she appears.
A spaceman in a fishbowl helmet, as seen in The Man from Planet X, 1951 |
More fishbowls from The Net, 1953 |
“To my amazement there, suspended on the top of the roof of this old farm, was this object that I can only describe as a huge Mexican hat. It was that shape, without the bobbles. It must have been fifteen to twenty yards from where I stood. It covered the roof, so in circumference it must have been about sixty feet, it was enormous. The people in the space-craft were just looking out, I could see them from the waist to the top of their heads. They were very beautiful people. They had long golden hair… (but no mention of the fishbowl helmets). and they just looked at us. Their eyes – the expression in their eyes – were full of compassion.”“And then all of a sudden, I felt the tension leaving me and I felt movement, and I turned around to touch my children and when I looked again it was gone.” Moments later, her younger son pointed it out then, “it circled round the farm three times, then it just shot straight up and away.”
“U.F.O.s” episode of Arthur C. Clarke’s Mysterious World (link) |
The biggest difference seems to be the size of the UFO. The figure Jessie gave for the saucer’s size in the first account was, “about 15 to 20 feet in diameter,” which matches the drawing she made for the newspaper. In her sketch, it depicts the saucer as room-sized, not house-sized. In the Jul-Aug 1955 FSR, investigator Wilfrid Daniels gave the size as “a 25-ft. saucer.” In her later television interviews the spaceship was described to be enormous, large enough to cover the entire roof of the cottage.Thirty Years Later, New Details EmergeExcepts from Jenny Randles’ Abduction (aka Alien Abductions), 1988, pages 68-70, Chapter 5, “Alien Abductions – The British Catalogue,” Type II: Contact Cases21 October 1954 – Ranton, Staffordshire This case is legendary in UFO circles, having featured in several books during the 1950s, but no one seemed to have looked at it recently, so on 6 August 1987 I interviewed the chief witness, Mrs Jessie Roestenburg. She was in her late twenties in 1954 and had two children, Anthony (aged eight) and Ronald (six). They do remember the events, but only vaguely. Jessie had felt ‘tingles’ all day, prior to 4:45 p.m., when the incident occurred. (Recap of sighting.)“It felt like hours passed, but it must have been seconds. Time was suspended. I was also paralysed. It was like I was in a vice. But my mind was working overtime.”
“…nothing Jessie said indicated to me that she was familiar with UFO cases…”Since then she has often thought about it: ‘This was something absolutely marvellous. The saddest part to me is that I have never been able to fully understand the greatness of this thing.’However, she says that she has since had a ‘great, almost extreme, development of ESP. I know things about people. I understand situations. All this probably sounds crazy, but it is true.’ Some of the things that have happened include seeing the aliens again in her house ‘. . . out of the corner of my eye …. But I think it could be a “thought thing”. It could be my imagination’.
These contacts have implanted feelings into her mind about the aliens: ‘I think they’ll be here when I need them …. They are surveying us. They’re afraid that we might panic. But some of them are living amongst us.’
Jessie Roestenburg impressed me because she had not become a ‘UFO nut’ and had seemingly read no books on the subject since 1954. She had seen the Spielberg film Close Encounters of the Third Kind but in typical fashion said about it, ‘I remember thinking whoever did this film has a good understanding of the subject. But when those little funny aliens came on I almost stood up and shouted, “They’re not like that!” I don’t believe in little green men. Not after what I’ve seen.”
From John Hanson 2006, Haunted Skies-Vol. 1. Photo by David Sankey |
“I seemed to be in some way drawn, or compelled, to the top of the garden – almost as if I was being manipulated by an outside influence, of which I had no control. I glanced around and saw the amazing sight of this flying saucer shaped object hovering 40-50 feet above the roof of the house. Inside the ‘saucer’ I could clearly see what looked like two humans, wearing long golden hair down to their shoulders. I felt a mixture of emotions – amazement and fear run through my body, followed by the thought, ‘God will wipe away all tears’. Immediately, all the tension left me, (something I have never disclosed to anyone before because of its religious significance). I turned to my sons and asked them if they had seen the ‘flying saucer’. They replied, ‘yes’.”
After the sighting, she felt revitalized, for a short time, until discovering a strange rash covering her face and front part of the body, accompanied by a considerable loss of weight over a relatively short period, which gave rise for concern. Jessie sought the advice of her Doctor, who was well aware of the UFO incident and intimated there was something wrong with her mental health.Offended by this suggestion, Jessie contacted a Psychiatrist – Dr. Wilson, who confirmed, after a medical examination, there was nothing wrong with her mental state of health. “He asked me if I had been given a chest x-ray and blood tests. When I told him this had not been done, he personally escorted me to hospital, where a chest X-ray was taken but found to be clear. Unfortunately, blood tests showed the blood count was very low. The haematologist said to me, ‘If it didn’t sound so ludicrous, l would say you have been exposed to a massive dose of radiation’. I was given injections of iron, twice a week, which caused all sorts of problems before the correct dosage was established.”
For readers who’d like more information on the Roestenburg story, check out the sources below and the BBL page of additional material, including:
- Epilogue: The Forgotten Witness
- Appendix: Roestenburg Family Sightings
- Bad UFOlogy: Jennie and Apocrypha
Muy buena historia sobre encuentro con platillos voladores, por Argentina hubo casos parecidos, y algunos abducidos con historias impresionantes, saludos
ReplyDelete
Replies
Me menciona algunos para estudiar y pasarlos al ingles .gracias
Delete
Replies
It’s not uncommon for witnesses to forget what they’ve seen. Whether a psychological reaction to protect themselves from unwanted thoughts or created by the event itself directly or inadvertently.
ReplyDelete
Replies