Antisemitic cartoon from the 1890s depicts the Jewish traitor Dreyfus being convicted of selling vital military secrets to Germany for whore, gambling and champagne money although he and his wife were both well-off.
My British WN friend, activist Jack Sen over in England asked me 1) how we were doing and 2) about our Dreyfus project.
I replied:
***
Well, as for Margi, tomorrow, Tuesday, down in Rochester, Minnesota (whither we are driving today for ten hours), Margi does her big PET scan to see if the cancer is really gone.
All signs (good weight gain, recovering her hair after it all fell out, getting back her voice, being able to open her mouth wide again, a nice, rosy complexion; and good blood-test results) indicate it is indeed gone – that is, the main tumor.
Or, in the worst-case scenario, it may still be cancerous a bit on some throat lymph nodes, and they need to be kept under a close watch.
PET scans actually use a harsh radioactive dye and and intense beam, and can actually re-scorch the radiated area, so they have to wait for three whole months after radiation — in Margi’s case, a whopping 34 sessions! — to do the PET scan.
Margi’s last proton-beam radiation was in December.
I have been extremely reluctant to start my Aryan religion — and take on the jew-controlled WORLD — until we are done with the Mayo — for obvious reasons.
Part of it is also simply road safety, driving 370 miles one-way and I know only too well how easy it is to come up from behind and cause a crash.
Just tap one corner of the back bumper over 35 mph and the car will spin out and flip over, possible killing the driver and passengers.
A former cop here in Ontonagon told me how they do it. He said:
“If you are pursuing someone and the only way to stop them is tap their bumper, you need to get explicit authorization for that. It can easily kill them if they are going over 35 mph.
Even with seatbelts on, if the car flips over and lands on the roof, unless there is a roll bar, like on some Mercedes or Volvos, the roof is weak and can be flattened, and the people inside are crushed to death.”
I remember a case in winter driving like that near Sarver, Pennsylvania, where Margi and I lived 2008-11. A woman in her van, with her seat belt on and air bags installed and working, skidded on an icy overpass, hit the rocky wall of a mountainside the highway had been cut through, her van flipped over — and her head was crushed when the roof crumpled.
So, anyway, every long trip we take like this is risking our lives.
Vaya con Dios, as the Spaniards say, “Go with God.”
The other thing protecting us is this:
These supercilious Jews figure they can slander or harass me so much (physically, legally and financially) that my religion can never take off, just as when they thwarted, by multiple means at their disposal, my 2012 attempt to run for president.
Part of it was a massive defamation campaign.
In fact, the Jews probably cannot wait to get started and shoot me down, figuratively, and then, once discredited and rejected by the masses, also literally.
Their hatred of me, yes, is that intense.
But their overconfidence and their derision of my potential is, exactly as back in 1920, a century ago, my secret blessing. 😉
….Dreyfus project
Margi did a great deal of research in the fall of 2014 and early 2015 on this striking “affair.” It resulted in a superb radio show with Carolyn Yeager. Now I am working that show up with much fascinating supplementary material.
(Partly also, it is to stay financially above water. A comrade who helped us during our long Leo Frank project 2013-2018 is again helpful in this regard, though not as much due to his circumstances changing.)
https://johndenugent.com/category/mary-phagan-leo-frank/
Article condemning me:
Margi and I did many audiobooks on this case, where the Jews made the vile 1913 rapist-strangler jew Leo Frank out to be the victim (of bigotry, race hated, antisemitism, prejudice, etc. etc. – the usual).
The only true thing above is that white men, tired of three straight years of jewspaper hate campaigns against white Southerners, and bribed-governor bullshit, did up and lynch his ass.
Today, the Jews really crank this accusatory-inversive stuff out on speed-dial, or speed-keyboard, but always, you see, the Jews are determined to be and stay on the attack.
The white victim is made into the perp by “the great masters of lying” (Schopenhauer).
Anyway, as I wrote to Jack Sen:
Our Dreyfus project is designed to prove:
1) the Jew army officer Dreyfus WAS a despicable traitor who sold top French military secrets to Germany for whore, champagne and gambling money, and
2) how the Jews, plucky in defeat if nothing else, turned the Dreyfus PR mega-disaster, which caused an explosion of French antisemitism, into a huge long-term victory.
This scandal had erupted right after the equally anti-Jew Panama Canal scandal. France was trying to build the Panam Canal to connect the Atlantic and Pacific oceans before Teddy Roosevelt and the Americans. It failed, and 800,000 Frenchmen lost their life savings, which they had put into stocks for the French Panama Canal company, because Jews put the money by the billions in their own pockets instead, or bribed politicos to look the other way!
It actually came out, with names and details, in the newspaper of the famous and heroic antisemite Édouard Drumont, that 150 members of the French parliament (oh, the joys of “democracy”) were on the Jew payroll, taking bribes to do nothing while the arch-Jewish mega-swindlers Jacques Reinach and Cornelius Herz ripped off the French people, including 16,000 single French women who lost everything.
In the end, by controlling the French money supply and the press, the Jews portrayed themselves as the victims, and crushed their conservative, antisemitic, anti-Freemasonic, pro-Christian enemies.
They vilified and slandered all those patriots truthfully accusing Dreyfus of low greed and high treason, and claimed (in their eternal, classic “accusatory inversion”) that the Antidreyfusards (the good guys, our WN brethren back then) knew the poor jew was innocent and framed him with invented, faked evidence of Dreyfus’ guilt.. and they did so out of vicious bigotry and hatred.
In fact, it was the Jews themselves massively faking evidence and bribing!
In the end, the left came to power.
–French Army – the victim – was purged of many of its really good rightwingers.
–The Catholic Church (back then, not ruled totally by jew-infiltrated pedophiles, and containing many good, sincere and very antisemitic clergy) lost its control of the public schools to the atheistic Jews and Freemasons.
–The monarchist, conservative forces in France who wanted to bring back the kings and abolish the horrid “République” were in full retreat, branded successfully to the drooling masses as lying, slanderous, evidence-faking haters.
The Jews created entire new newspapers JUST to push “the poor Jewish victim Dreyfus” agenda, and bribed journalists with other newspapers.
The jews murdered at least six truthtellers, including a president of France!!!
And then they defamed him, the victim, after killing THE PRESIDENT OF FRANCE via poison, lying that he had died while a whore gave him (sorry to be vulgar, but this is what the vulgar jews themselves wrote) such an intense blowjob, it caused him to have a heart attack!
So they killed the man and then mocked him!
This whore was bribed to poison him, and, while the Jewspapers derided the antisemites for saying this, she later was arrested for poisoning her own husband and her own mother!!!!
Here now, before we leave for Rochester, Minnesota and the Mayo Clinic for, I hope our final sojourn there, is part of my work — the interview Carolyn Yeager did with Margi. (Please pardon any typos.)
***
“The Heretics’ Hour: The Dreyfus Affair” from BlogTalkRadio.com by Carolyn Yeager Uncensored. Released: 2015. Link:
CY: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Thanks for joining me for this live “Heretics Hour” broadcast. This is going to be quite special. It’s Monday, January 19th, 2015. And I’m Carolyn Yeager, your host. My guest is the always popular Margaret Huffstickler. And the topic she’s bringing us tonight is the Dreyfus Affair.
Now, I tried to call Margaret just while the intro music was playing, but the call failed. So I’m going to have to start all over again, and do it while we’re on the air. So here we go. Bear with me, please. Get this. I’ve got the phone number in there, but they don’t seem to like it. I mean, I’ll type the number one more time. Let’s see why this doesn’t work. She’ll have to call me. Let’s see if this works. Now, I sure hope so. It’s dialing. So we definitely need to get Margaret on here.
There; there we go; there we go. We’re going to put her on. Success. Yes. I hear you, Margaret. Oh, good. Yeah. So I was going to say:
Welcome to the program, Margaret.
MH: Thank you. I’m glad to be here, and to share this information.
CY: Well, right. This is going to be exciting and kind of a fun program. I’ve been studying up on it somewhat. But you’re the expert on it. and it’s extremely convoluted and involved
MH: Purposefully so!
CY: Right. There’s a lot that could be commented on. I’m going to try to keep my mouth shut and listen. I mean, or break in, you know, to help move things along or something.
What strikes me, just overall, is that everything is backwards about it. I mean, everything that is true is presented as false. And all the good people back then, the people who were the good ones in that period, are now seen as bad people and liars.
MH: It was a very successful operation. Yeah, it’s a classic example of
“The Jew cries out as he strikes you.”
CY: Yes. OK. Well, why don’t you just start in where you want to start!
MH: Okay. Let’s see. Well, I have this outline of sort of the plot of it, but maybe I’ll give a little bit of background to it. You know, this started in 1894 in the General Staff of France.
CY: The French military, right?
MH: Yes, the French army; that’s right. The French General Staff, and it’s under the Minister of War.
And this [Dreyfus Affair began] 24 years after they got their butts handed to them by Germany in the Franco-Prussian War [of 1870], when Germany got back [its old German-speaking provinces of] Alsace and Lorraine.
***
The defeated Emperor Napoleon III was captured, taken prisoner and meets with the Prussian king
***
And often when you read about this, the first thing you’re going to read in a book, if they are giving historical background is, is this fact, and the fact that, I think it was Bismarck, who remarked to one of the French: “You know, we won because we had so much better intelligence than you had” —
The prisoner Napoleon III and the mastermind of German victory, chancellor Otto von Bismarck 
— because the French had almost non-existent [military] intelligence and the Germans were just all over them. They knew what was going on in advance.
So since then, the French have been scrambling to catch up. And of course, this [affair] really takes place in the espionage section of the of the French Army. It was called the “Information Bureau,” or they also called it, the “Office of Statistics” to kind of be sneaky about it.
And one thing that’s also good to know is the Germans are still way ahead of them, and, say, the Germans had a budget of the equivalent of 30 million francs, and the French had one of 500,000 francs. So that’s a huge difference.
CY: Wow.
MH: Yes.
And at that time there is an alliance between Austria, Germany and Italy, kind of against France. It was called the Triplice, the “Triple Alliance,” and the people we’d be concerned with, I mean the countries, would be more Germany and Italy than Austria. Austria is not really involved in this story.
And in their embassies [in Paris, and elsewhere] Germany had military attachés, and I guess it was the same for the Italians. They had military attachés whose real jobs were to spy. And the French — heh-heh –when you read the French about this, they’re like, “This is horrifying that anybody would spy in an embassy. You’re not supposed to do that.” 😉
Well, that’s what spies do, I guess.
But they [the French] had a system. The French had a very nice “in” into the German embassy, and to the military attaché there, who was named Schwartzkoppen — a good German name.
***
Captain Maximilian von Schwartzkoppen, later a general in WWI
They had — the French had — a woman named Madame Bastian, who was a housekeeper there, a maid there [working in the German Embassy in Paris]. And she would empty the wastebasket for Schwartzkoppen, and [later] hand [the contents] to [French] Lieutenant-Colonel Henry, who worked for the “Statistical Section” [ = “Section de statistique“]
And then he would take it back and they just didn’t even bother to burn their papers. They just would tear it into pieces and put it in the wastebasket, and then she’d deliver them to the Statistical Section.
CY: So let’s get this real clear for the listeners. So you have the German embassy in France, and then there is a Frenchwoman who is the housekeeper. Now, that’s a bad idea already. And while she’s doing the housekeeping, she knows to look through the wastebaskets.
MH: No, she just dumps the whole thing into a sack, like a paper sack, and takes it to the…..
CY: So she was a spy. And the Germans weren’t — they should have been paying attention to the fact that a Frenchwoman cleaning up their wastebaskets is not a good idea.
MH: And also you think it might haven been good to just burn the stuff. But I think a lot of them were under the impression that she was illiterate. Maybe she was pretty smart that way because she wasn’t illiterate, though many Dreyfusards [ = those who claimed then that D. was innocent] depict her that way, as being, like, a coarse, illiterate woman. But she seems to have been a very good woman, very honorable. You know, spies go home, too, and that was their job.
CY: Yes. You know, it’s funny how in France they call everybody “madame,” even if they’re poor cleaning woman.
MH: Yes, that is true. 🙂
CY: So you get, you know, it’s for us, for somebody who’s not French, it’s like, oh, “Madame” — that must be high society.
MH: Yes. heh-heh.
CY: Okay, so we’ve got that clear how the lady did it.
MH: And they called it the voie ordinaire, that is, “the ordinary route,” because they just used it all the time and they got a lot of good stuff from there [the wastebasket].
And before I go on this, I’ll just tell you a little bit about the way the Statistical Section was organized, so you know who I’m talking about a little bit. Maybe it’s not very much, but I’ll tell you this, that the Minister of War at that time was General Mercier.
***
Général Auguste Mercier, a resolute Antidreyfusard until his death in 1921
***
And he’s the one who’s going to have the authority later to have Dreyfus arrested. And below him is the head of the General Staff who’s General [Raoul de] Boisdeffre.
And then just below him, the subhead of the general staff is the one whom people report to from the Statistics Office. He’s right above them, and he’s General Gonse.
So below him, you’ve got the Statistical Section and the head of the statistical section. His name is [Colonel Nicolas] Sandherr.
And he he really put the Statistical Section together in the past six years since he’s been working there. (I think it was six years.) He’s really gotten it working well, and then there are various people below them.
And two [more men] that we’ll have a lot to do with are [Major Armand] du Paty de Clam…a very aristocratic name.
He’s going to be doing the investigation of Dreyfus, and Lieutenant Colonel, later Colonel Henry.
Then there’s a Lieutenant Colonel Picquart [photo, left], and he’s going to take over the Statistics office after Sandherr is, perhaps, poisoned.
Okay. So here we are in the Statistical Section, and they’ve just gotten a delivery from the voie ordinaire, and it’s 1894.
And they get this delivery, and they start putting it together, In fact, Henry puts it together.
In fact, his wife testifies later, that he was putting it together at the dining room table at home.
And it’s like, “Oooh, look what this is.”
It’s a very important paper. They call it a bordereau, which means it’s an itemized list, and it’s a list of things that this person has either given to the German military attaché, or is going to, with things like a note on the hydraulic brake on a 120-millimeter cannon.
Now, this is very important because the Germans didn’t have this brake — and it makes the cannon fire much more efficiently if you’ve got a good brake so you won’t have too much recoil.
So all of these are very important pieces of information that are on this list. It’s five very important things. And there’s a note on covering troops, I don’t really understand “covering troops,” but I guess it’s troops that cover the other troops [JdN: as they move, advancing or retreating, and are unable to fire cannons or rifles accurately during this time. All advancing troops say “cover me” to the soldier or unit next to them.]
Then there’s a note on a modification in the artillery formations, and a note relating to Madagascar. [France is] about to invade [and colonize] Madagascar [off the African coast].
*** JdN: On Madagascar
Hitler wanted to put all the Jews of Europe on this island under German control, and keep them isolated there.
I wrote this book about the Reich’s “reservation”plan (the term used by Alfred Rosenberg) under the pen name of my research collaborator, Ralph Grandinetti, a onetime stormtrooper with George Lincoln Rockwell.
***
And it also contained a proposal for a firing manual for the field artillery.
So these are all very important pieces of information.
This guy is, like, “Here’s an itemized list of the things I’m giving you.”
[And the French officers] reading this are, like: “Oh, my God!”
And the thing is, this [proof of treason] doesn’t come out of the blue, because they’ve been getting messages saying that there’s somebody in the General Staff who’s selling secrets.
There’s a Spanish attaché who’s got a French wife. And he kind of feels a connection to the French. And he wrote them a note, saying,
“You’ve got a wolf in your sheepfold.”
And he wrote another one.
“You’ve got somebody in your General Staff who is selling secrets to the Germans.”
But they just don’t know what to do about it until they get something more specific. Then here this is, more specific.
So they start looking around, and there aren’t really that many people who are in a position to give this information away, and have this information.
What they realize is that it would be someone who is what they call a stagiaire here. He’s going through different stages. He’s like an intern.
He goes through the first department, the first bureau, second bureau, third bureau and fourth bureau.
And one of them is artillery. And so these bits of information come from different bureaus. And somebody who was a stagiaire would be in a perfect position to give it. Then somebody notices the resemblance of the handwriting to Dreyfus’.
And so they submit the handwriting to some experts without giving the name of who it is.
So people would say, “Oh, they just were being anti-Semitic.” You know, these experts had no idea whose handwriting it was. It was just asked, you know, what they thought.
And at first it was given to a man who worked for the Bank of France. And he’s like, “Oh, this [bordereau handwriting] is clearly the same [as the handwriting sample they had given him from Dreyfus]. But let me take it home.”
And he came back the next day, and he says, “Just whose handwriting is this?” And they respond: “We’re not telling you!” 🙂
And by then they got other experts in, because they didn’t want somebody who wanted to know whose handwriting it was, and they could tell that he already knew whose handwriting it was. It seemed he had sort of already gotten some word. And this is the guy who worked for the Bank of France. So that’s interesting…..
CY: So that fits, doesn’t it. It seems like he was on the side of the Jews.
MH: Yes, so anyway, it got narrowed down, and they realized that it must be, or probably is Dreyfus’, but they didn’t want to just go and immediately arrest him.
Some of them really thought they should wait and have him followed more. But what they ended up doing was that they had this man, [Major Armand] du Paty de Clam, do a test where — all this time, Dreyfus was on leave [military term for “vacation”].
So he wasn’t around anyway. So since he came back from leave, they did this test, where du Paty said, “Oh, could you take this dictation for me because my hand hurts?”
He starts dictating something, and Dreyfus is just writing away normally, and then [du Paty] starts putting in phrases [taken right] from the bordereau, like about maneuvers and artillery and cannon, heh-heh. 😉
As these phrases start coming along, Dreyfus’ handwriting changes and it gets bigger and it starts as if maybe he’s trying to change it, and make it not look like his anymore.
So anyway, they end up arresting him.
And they all seem to say the same thing. There were several people there. People were just pretending to be casually there in the office. So they were all observing this. And they all said it looked as if he’d prepared for this. And he’s being very theatrical. “Oh, no, I am innocent!” And he’s [literally] looking in the mirror, so they say. That sounds very strange.
But at any rate, he’s arrested and he’s interrogated. And then he’s taken to the Cherche-Midi [military] prison [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherche-Midi_prison].
CY:…. because his handwriting matched the note….
MH: Yes, that’s right. Exactly.
CY: Before, he was trying to change it.
MH: That’s right….because he tried to change it when he started realizing what they were doing.
CY: Yes, yes.
MH: He’s somebody where I can’t think of a single reason for somebody to do that unless they recognized those phrases.
CY: Right.
MH: You know, it’s like a confession.
So at this point, I think they made a mistake because they left him alone for two days before they interrogated him again. At that point, the [news]papers had gotten hold of it, and said [in headlines] “Captain Dreyfus arrested” or “General Staff officer Dreyfus arrested.”
They say that there’s a story which, I think, was written down at the time, so it must be true, I think, because it wasn’t [based on] knowing what did happen later that it was [initially] written down.
The chief of police of Paris got a visit from the Grand Rabbi of France [1889-1905], Zadoc Kahn, and he said,
“If you people go ahead with this, there is going to be a war that will split France in two.”
And he says,
“You think we can’t do it? Well, we can.”
It was so absolutely in your face, like somebody calling a pool shot.
CY: This was the head rabbi?
MH: Head rabbi of France.
Dreyfus wasn’t just any Jew. I mean, he was fairly wealthy and, you know, had a fairly wealthy, prominent wife, but it wasn’t that that he was so special. It was that it was the whole idea that he was the only Jew on the General Staff. And, you know, it really set them back, because they were just starting to admit more Jews in the military.
CY: Right.
MH: And into sensitive positions.
*** Wikipedia on the Great Synagogue of Paris (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Synagogue_of_Paris)
On April 21, 1890, Alfred Dreyfus married Lucie Hadamard in the synagogue.
The ceremony was officiated by the Chief Rabbi of France, Zadoc Kahn, a future ‘Dreyfusard’ who advocated for Dreyfus’ freedom.
***
CY: If they were trying to do that, though, it seems so silly to take a chance like that. And why would they? Was he a part of a larger plan in doing this treason, or would you know?
MH: I think [Dreyfus] was doing it all on his own.
CY: Making money?
MH: You know, Monique Delcroix, and of course your listeners don’t know about her, but I got a lot of information from this great French book by her.
***
Dreyfus-Esterhazy — Refutation of the Vulgate
Pdf in French: Delcroix Monique – Dreyfus-Esterhazy Réfutation de la vulgate
Summary in French:
Certes, l’affaire Dreyfus a fait couler énormément d’encre depuis un siècle. Mais la quasi-totalité des ouvrages sont soumis à ce que Monique Delcroix nomme la “vulgate”, c’est-à-dire une manière obligée de raconter l’histoire. Non seulement l’innocence d’Alfred Dreyfus est érigée en dogme, mais de plus un historien “correct” se doit de tenir pour établi que c’est Esterhazy qui a écrit le fameux bordereau ; que le colonel Picquart a découvert fortuitement la culpabilité d’Esterhazy ; que l’état-major a guidé et protégé Esterhazy jusqu’à son procès ; que les dreyfusards n’ont eu aucune relation avec Picquart, ni indirecte avant juillet 1897 ni directe avant janvier 1898, et srictement aucun contact avec Esterhazy.
Translation into English:
Of course, the Dreyfus Affair has caused a lot of ink to be spilled for over a century now. But almost all the works are subject to what Monique Delcroix calls the “vulgate”, that is, an obligatory way of telling the story. Not only is the innocence of Alfred Dreyfus a dogma, but also a “correct” historian must hold it to be established that it was [another French officer], Esterhazy, who wrote the famous bordereau [and was the real spy and traitor, sending secrets to Germany];
that colonel Picquart quite accidentally discovered the guilty one was Esterhazy ; that the General Staff guided and protected Esterhazy [whom they knew to be guilty and Dreyfus innocent] until his trial; that the (((Dreyfusards))) [Jews, Masons, atheists, leftists and assorted bribable individuals] had no contacts or relationship with Picquart[…] and no contact whatsoever with Esterhazy [paying him to escape to England and then plead guilty to Dreyfus’ crime from safety there].
A series of sixteen antisemitic cartoons about Dreyfus and the machinations to get the traitor off:
- The story we will tell is already known throughout the universe. It is that of a wretch who had a soul so vile he betrayed his country. It is true that he was a Jew.
2. Instead of selling army binoculars, or swindling on the stock exchange and thus following the example of his peers, this bandit, named Dreyfus, becomes a General Staff officer in our Army. He took this opportunity to sell our military secrets abroad.
3. But soon there were suspicious signs. A very close surveillance began, and after several months it became clear that Dreyfus, the new Judas, was guilty of the crime of treason.
4. Confounded by the overwhelming testimonies of twenty-three officers, Dreyfus, despite the desperate efforts of his lawyer, Demange, was unanimously convicted and sentenced to perpetual deportation.
5. Any poor soldier who got a little drunk and threatened his corporal would be mercilessly shot. But THIS traitor’s neck was saved. On the day of his degradation [his rank was ripped off his uniform and his sword broken], he shouted he was innocent and we would get the proof in three years.
6. However, soon after, remorse took over, and he confesses his crime to Captain Labrun-Renaud. “If I handed over documents,” he says, “it was only to get more important ones.”
7. When Dreyfus was embarked for Devil’s Island,
the Jews started a riot to try to help him escape. Furious and desperate, they cried out that he was a “martyr,” and they swore that he would return to France in triumph. [Exclamation: “We will avenge you.”]
8. Three years later, in accordance with the traitor’s prophecy, a senator named Scheurer-Keutner suddenly discovered Dreyfus was innocent.Where did this sudden inspiration come from?
9. A number of politicians, more or less involved in the Panama Canal stock scandal and other shady affairs, ran off to see Scheurer. [Jews stole vast sums from 800,000 investors in a French project to build the first Panama Canal — before the Americans — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_scandals]. “We are only too happy to believe in the innocence of Dreyfus,” they say, ” but first, please, do enlighten us.”
10. The Truth appeared to them almost immediately, surrounded by a yellow metallic glow that convinced them on the spot. “We have seen the light!”they cried aloud, and so the arrangement was made.
11. Mathieu Dreyfus, brother of the traitor and industrialist in Germany, initiated hostilities by publishing a letter in which he denounced Commander Esterhazy as being “the real traitor.”
To be continued, God willing, on our safe return, God willing.
Leave a Reply