Four years prison for visiting pro-white websites

I received truly incredible new from Jewish-Occupied Finland, sent me by Henrik Holappa, who stayed at our home for eight months before the lesbian jewess Janet Winer Napolitano abducted him, put him for 86 days in solitary confinement in a federal prison in Batavia, New York State, and then banned him as a terrorist [!!!!!!!!] back to Finland.

Finland is the easternmost of the Scandinavian countries, and its government inflicts perhaps the most extreme political persecution of pro-white dissidents of any of the 25-odd countries in the entire European Union, equal to or worse than that in jew-dominated Germany or zionist-intimidated Austria.

The Finns, according to the great Harvard anthropologist Carlton Coon, are a remnant of the original pre-Indo-European white Cro-Magnons, like the Basques, and left their home in Ice Age Spain to follow the melting glaciers in a northeasterly direction, hunting reindeer and wild horses, in a migration that brought them eventually to modern Finland.

A friend asked me the other day why the Scandinavians, descendants of the fierce Vikings, were nowadays just “rolling over” to leftist multiracialism in a manner that is the most sickeningly COMPLIANT of all the countries in the white world. (And US states with high Scandinavian populations, such as Washington State, Oregon and Minnesota are among the most leftist, pro-immigrant states here in our country. Minnesota, for example, is filling up with black muslim Somalians just as Finland is! Although Seattle, Washington is getting hundreds of thousands of white-flight Californians, do they vote rightwing after that? NO, they voted for years bizarrely for a black mayor just like the one they had in Los Angeles!! That indicates that the Nordic race HAS A PROBLEM.)

Partly this compliance, in my considered opinion, is due to Ice Age mutated traits that were good for survival in the Ice Age, but today perform as a defect in Nordic people in TODAY’S un-natural, artificial,  MULTIRACIAL urban environment.

In the Ice Age, only those who were responsible, followed the rules, were prudent and altruistic could survive. Every one of these traits can be misused today by the jew in a multiracial situation after his invisible control over the media and finance leads to taking over the major political parties, and then seizing the government itself.

Then the government, flaunting its faux “democratic authority,”  tells the obedient Scandinavians — who believe that “all must play by the rules” — that “hate”‘ is illegal, irresp0nsible, selfish and above all, imprudent, impulsive and risky.

Then every Nordic gene kicks in to say: Obey the rules.

[Hate = not wanting muslim gang rapists to rape your women!!]

I discuss this Nordic “play by the rules” mania in my forthright and I think very bold new post here: https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/01/14/mediterranean-superiority-over-nordic-whites

There is a special additional circumstance , however, in Finland, because alone of all Scandinavian countries, it was semi-occupied by the Soviet Union after WWII.

Actually, Soviet troops did not directly enter the country, but as a condition of the Red Army NOT invading (and raping and killing, putting hundreds of thousands in the gulag, and then communizing and nationalizing the economy while crushing all religion) certain Finns who were Soviet agents or collaborators had to be allowed to take over the political police and all major political parties. (It sounds like what the jews have done to America!)

Finland was thus, in a Cold War neologism, “finlandized,” that is, there were no Soviet tanks in the streets, and it was not made part of the Soviet Union — but all political and media power was used to prevent anti-Soviet policies.

Below right: crypto-jew Aatos Erkko, billionare master of the Finnish media. The older he gets, the jewier his curved nose gets as well, highlighting his greasy black hair. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aatos_Erkko).

As Henrik Holappa told me, this

Soviet demand, made by Stalin in 1944, meant specifically that the Finnish political police (unlike those of Sweden, Norway, Denmark or Iceland) were literally trained by the Soviet KGB, and after the fall of Soviet communism in 1990-1991,  the same individuals with the same KGB mentality stayed right on the job.

And the Finns were “used” to being crushed and forced into silence, although from 1939 to 1944 their fathers as soldiers had fought the Soviets with unparallelled heroism in both the Winter War and the Continuation War.

NOW, the mission of the Finnish state police is no longer to protect Soviet power, but to crush all political resistance to the influx of gang-raping Africans, Turks and Kurds into all-white Finland.

In 1995, Finland got its “hate speech” law, and this is what got Henrik Holappa in hot water for protesting vicious gang rapists who were all non-white immigrants. This is why he came to our home at my invitation and applied for political asylum in the United States.

Here, now is Henrik Holappa’s emailed report about the latest development from jew-ruled Finland.

* * *

Finland Worsens Suppression of  Freedom of Speech

By Henrik Holappa

19 January 2010

The Finnish Department of Justice is now planning on suppressing even more our freedom of speech here in Finland. The special legal group of the Department of Justice is now writing the blueprints of a new law that would especially focus on so-called “Internet Racism.”

The major newspaper in Finland, Helsingin Sanomat, reported on the suggested plan on their websites at http://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/artikkeli/Nettirasismia+halutaan+kitke%C3%A4+uusilla+s%C3%A4%C3%A4nn%C3%B6ksill%C3%A4/1135252244859

According to the new bill being prepared for submission to the Finnish parliament, just clicking on an allegedly “racist” or “white supremacist” website (whether it is David Duke’s, the Finnish Resistance Movement’s websites or any other prominent white-human-rights site) would be enough to sentence a Finnish citizen to FOUR YEARS IN PRISON.

I repeat: just visiting a “racist” website would be enough to sentence someone to four years of incarceration.

Henrik Holappa stayed with John de Nugent and Margaret Huffstickler for eight months before a muslim US federal bureacrat, Kalias Muhammad, ordered his arrest in March 2009. Holappa had objected to muslims raping Finnish girls. He was threatened with three indictments in Finland: 1) for inciting hatred, 2) defaming the honor of the black community of Finland, and 3) a more than ludicrous charge of copyright violation — for supposedly sending a photo from a Finnish newspaper website as an email attachment to an American friend (for which he faced six months imprisonment).

According to the Department of Justice, this new law would tremendously hinder the development of “racism” in Finland, and as mentioned especially on the Internet.

Probably one reason behind the new law proposal was the shooting rampage in Espoo, a city near Helsinki, that took place on the New Year’s eve. The suspected shooter, Ibrahim Shkupolli, – an apparent muslim ethnic Albanian from Kosovo, shot four FINNS at the shopping mall and later on that day Shkupolli shot himself. Before the shooting took place at the shopping mall, he had already shot his former Finnish girlfriend.

However, this event had stimulated among Finnish citizens a lively discussion about our uncontrolled mass-immigration — and the Finnish government considered this discussion “racist.”

(It was not racist for this Kosovan to murder five white Finns.)

The special legal group of the Finnish government’s Department of Justice would like to add a new paragraph to the already existing law in their struggle against “racism.” The addendum would carry a name of “Aggravated Incitement of Racial Hatred,” and the maximum sentence for this “crime” would be four years behind bars. The law could be also be appplied as an additional charge along with “incitement of mass destruction” or a slaying committed for a terrorist purpose.

One can only guess what “incitement of mass destruction” may really mean. In Spain, for example, just denying the Holocaust – or simply questioning it – is prosecuted (as in the case of publisher Pedro Varela) as “incitement of genocide”! There is no “Holocaust denial” law yet in Finland, but several other existing “anti-racist” laws could be applied to imprison an individual who doubted the Jewish Holocaust story.

The current law against “incitement of racial hatred” allows a person to be sentenced to a maximum of two years in prison. Of course the government and the legal system may use both legal paragraphs – incitement of racial hatred and “aggravated” incitement of racial hatred – to sentence an individual to a maximum sentence of six years in prison, including using several other legal paragraphs – such as “violation of freedom of speech” and in some cases even “aggravated defamation,” all combined in one long prison term — in a country whose Constitution guarantees freedom of speech.

Finnish radio host Vivii Avellan was almost terrorized off the air for saying she enjoyed dating blond men.

However, if the bill now being drawn up is passed into law by our Parliament, it would produce the following:

–an individual visits a pro-white website and leaves a comment on the discussion board

– he has committed two serious crimes, 1) “incitement of racial hatred” and “violation of freedom of speech”

Today in Finland, whenever a foreigner is the victim of any crime, the police investigation assumes it was racially motivated. This explains the statistical growth of “racist crimes” in Finland, but this assumption does not prove that all crimes in which a foreign individual has been a crime victim were racist in motivation.

The new law would also make it possible to punish entire groups of individuals that may share a common racialist view, whether they share it out in public or on different forums on the Internet. If the law is passed and then applied in this way, it could lead to the arrest and conviction of hundreds or even thousands of Finns in the near future.

Our freedom of speech in Finland could thus be tremendously restricted in the next few months. This would force the Finnish nationalists to fall silent about the harm caused to our people by the multicultural society imposed on us, using hate-speech laws to silence dissent. The new definition of racism by this government can only be guessed at, but the every-day racism, violence, rapes and death committed against our Finnish people will probably not be prosecuted at all under the new proposed law as racism.

* * *

I wrote Henrik my reaction:

* * *

Thank God that the Eternal Solutrean movement will be in effect before then. This news, however, is shocking and is devastating for us — but also, if exposed, devastating for any chance of European-style hate-speech laws ever being passed in America, especially with Obama crashing in the polls .

Obongo has just lost a key election in Massachusetts, an ultra-leftist state where the liberal multiracialists have always won, in an election to replace Ted Kennedy. Despite Air Force One flying the illegal alien from Kenya (who masquerades as the US president) to Massachussetts to campaign especially for Marcia Coakley, the current Attorney General of that state (and also a nice-looking woman, which never ever hurts in politics), Obama and Coakley were defeated by the relatively rightwing white male state senator and reserve military officer, Scott Brown, who has been vehemently opposed to Obama’s nightmarish federal healthcare scam.

Once again Obama has campaigned for a Democrat, risking his full “presidential” prestige, and his candidate has LOST!

This stinging defeat for the illegal president will also deny Obama, the man who ordered your arrest and whose minion at JFK Airport told you, when you were expelled in June, that “the highest levels of the government are interested in your case,” the 60 votes he needs in the United States Senate to pass any unpopular leftist laws into effect, such as a hate-speech law to silence Americans.

The “filibuster” law says that 60 senators are needed to shut down any senator who is delaying a law. But Obama has just lost this last advantage he had. His approval among whites is now probably at 25%. And most military and police officers are white males. Scott Brown is NOT a white nationalist, but he is a white male conservative (and reserve military officer) who defeated a (good-looking) female liberal — who was Attorney General of Massachusetts — in the most leftist and pro-Obama state in America back in November 2008.

Hang in there, Henrik. I wil make this tomorrow’s blogpost.

I am interested in a comrade’s ideas for a mass email campaign to stop this law. As you know, HH, Bill Fox of www.americafirstbooks.com did a massive blizzarding email campaign to the Norwegian and Finnish parliaments and to Finnish-American associations that helped get all three indictments against you from being submitted to the court in your country. I and your sister also did tremendous efforts to promote your case among white nationalists for months. So although you were expelled from the USA, you arrived back in Finland as a free man, under no indictment.

In addition, it is now being urged that I run for Congress this year. This Finnish website law will be a fantastic way to wake up white American voters!!! And as America goes, so goes the entire western world.

John de Nugent

* * *

A comrade sent me this:

* * *

Stockholm Syndrome.

You can actually discover all these signs in today’s politics and how politicians behave, when it comes to Israel and the jews.

In psychology, the Stockholm syndrome is a term used to describe a paradoxical psychological phenomenon wherein hostages express adulation and have positive feelings towards their captors that appear irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims.
* Hostages who develop Stockholm syndrome often view the perpetrator as giving life by simply not taking it. In this sense, the captor becomes the person in control of the captive’s basic needs for survival and the victim’s life itself.

* The hostage endures isolation from other people and has only the captor’s perspective available. Perpetrators routinely keep information about the outside world’s response to their actions from captives to keep them totally dependent.

* The hostage taker threatens to kill the victim and gives the perception of having the capability to do so. The captive judges it safer to align with the perpetrator, endure the hardship of captivity, and comply with the captor than to resist and face murder.

* The captive sees the perpetrator as showing some degree of kindness. Kindness serves as the cornerstone of Stockholm syndrome; the condition will not develop unless the captor exhibits it in some form toward the hostage. However, captives often misinterpret a lack of abuse as kindness and may develop feelings of appreciation for this perceived benevolence. If the captor is purely evil and abusive, the hostage will respond with hatred. But, if perpetrators show some kindness, victims will submerge the anger they feel in response to the terror and concentrate on the captors’ “good side” to protect themselves.

[See my follow-up post: https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/01/21/finn-government-silence-while-we-rape-you-jdn-videos]