The so-called British Empire, which actually the jews have run since 1720, and especially through the Rothschild family since the battle of Waterloo in 1815 (which is another story, one of lying to cause a stock-market panic), was created with the bravery of British soldiers and developed with money extracted from the 200 million people in India, who then were a fifth of earth’s population.
In this Empire-glorifying poster, all the Brits look handsome and nordic (which some are, or were) and it is implied that the Empire is for the power of the White race.
IN WHITE ARE THE ONLY COUNTRIES AGAINST WHICH BRITAIN NEVER WENT TO WAR.
Baron Evelyn Rothschild poking the future king Charles III in the chest, though any physical touching of the monarch by a mere Englishman is considered absolutely taboo, yet a jew may do it.
.
.
…..How [Judeo]-Britain Stole $45 Trillion From India And Lied About It.
By Jason Hickel
[JdN: I unfortunately find this theory plausible as long as British jewry rightly gets the blame. The United States financial system is also built on a jewish mega-scam, the Federal Reserve, and on making the world use US dollars to purchase all oil and gas.
Or else the Pentagon will go to war with you, and President Charles de Gaulle saw this clearly and said so to his aide, Alain Peyrefitte.
In effect, the world indirectly pays for our gigantic US budget deficits.
We just print more money out of thin air, and with this empty paper we buy real products from the world. Leave the dollar system, and the US will overthrow or go to war with you.]
Franklin Rosenfeld himself ordered and approved A NEW back of the US one-dollar bill in 1935.
.
***
December 14, 2018 “Information Clearing House” –
There is a story that is commonly told in Britain that the colonisation of India – as horrible as it may have been – was not of any major economic benefit to Britain itself. If anything, the administration of India was a cost to Britain. So the fact that the empire was sustained for so long – the story goes – was a gesture of Britain’s benevolence.
New research by the renowned economist Utsa Patnaik and her likewise economist husband, published by Columbia University Press [Columbia is a very prestigious Ivy-League university located in New York City] deals a crushing blow to this narrative.
Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion [$45,000 billion] from India during the period 1765 to 1938.
It’s a staggering sum. For perspective, $45 trillion is 17 times more than the total annual gross domestic product of the United Kingdom today.
How did this come about?
It happened through the trade system. Prior to the colonial period, Britain bought goods like textiles and rice from Indian producers and paid for them in the normal way – mostly with silver – as they did with any other country.
But something changed in 1765, shortly after the East India Company took control of the subcontinent [by defeating France there as elsewhere] and established a monopoly over Indian trade.
Here’s how it worked. The East India Company began collecting taxes in India, and then cleverly used a portion of those revenues (about a third) to fund the purchase of Indian goods for British use. In other words, instead of paying for Indian goods out of their own pocket, British traders acquired them for free, “buying” from peasants and weavers using money that had just been taken from them via taxes.
It was a scam – theft on a grand scale. Yet most Indians were unaware of what was going on because the agent who collected the taxes was not the same as the one who showed up to buy their goods. Had it been the same person, they surely would have smelled a rat.
Some of the stolen goods were consumed in Britain, and the rest were re-exported elsewhere. The re-export system allowed Britain to finance a flow of imports from Europe, including strategic materials like iron, tar and timber, which were essential to Britain’s industrialisation. Indeed, the Industrial Revolution depended in large part indirectly on this systematic mega-theft from India.
On top of this, the British were able to sell the stolen goods to other countries for much more than they “bought” them for in the first place, pocketing not only 100 percent of the original value of the goods but also the markup.
After the British Raj took over in 1847, colonisers added a special new twist to the tax-and-buy system. As the East India Company’s monopoly broke down, Indian producers were allowed to export their goods directly to other countries. But Britain made sure that the payments for those exported Indian goods nonetheless ended up in London.
How did this work? Basically, anyone who wanted to buy goods from India would do so using special “Council Bills” – a unique paper currency issued only by the British Crown.
And the only way to get those Council Bills was to buy them from London with gold or silver.
So traders would pay London in gold to get the bills, and then use the bills to pay Indian producers. When Indians cashed the bills in at the local colonial office, they were “paid” in rupees out of tax revenues – money that had just been collected from them. So, once again, they were not in fact paid at all; they were defrauded.
Meanwhile, London ended up with all of the gold and silver that should have gone directly to the Indians in exchange for their exports.
This corrupt system meant that even while India was running an impressive trade surplus with the rest of the world – a surplus that lasted for three decades in the early 20th century – it showed up as a deficit in the national accounts because the real income from India’s exports was appropriated in its entirety by Britain.
Some point to this fictional “deficit” as evidence that India was a liability to Britain. But exactly the opposite is true. Britain intercepted enormous quantities of income that rightly belonged to Indian producers. India was a goose that laid the golden egg. Meanwhile, the “deficit” meant that India had no option but to borrow from Britain to finance its imports. So the entire Indian population was forced into completely unnecessary debt to their colonial overlords, further cementing British control.
Britain used the windfall from this fraudulent system to fuel the engines of imperial violence – funding the invasion of China in the 1840s [JdN: to prohibit the Chinese emperor from banning British opium!] and the suppression of the Indian (“Sepoy”) Rebellion in 1857.
*** JdN
The Indians, while understandably enraged, did also commit truly wicked atrocities against unarmed, white, British civilians in India, including women.
A Mrs.Wheeler shot right back:
Wiklipedia:
The Indian rebellion was fed by resentments born of diverse perceptions, including invasive British-style social reforms, harsh land taxes, summary treatment of some rich landowners and princes,[12][13] as well as scepticism about the improvements brought about by British rule.[g][14]
Many Indians rose against the British; however, many also fought for the British, and the majority remained seemingly compliant to British rule.[h][14]
Violence, which sometimes betrayed exceptional cruelty, was inflicted on both sides, on British officers, and civilians, including women and children, by the rebels, and on the rebels, and their supporters, including sometimes entire villages, by British reprisals; the cities of Delhi and Lucknow were laid waste in the fighting and the British retaliation.[i][14]
[…]
Overall five white men and 206 white women and children were confined as British hostages in the Bibigarh [prison by the rebels] for about two weeks. In one week 25 were brought out, dead from dysentery and cholera.[113]
Meanwhile, a Company relief force that had advanced from Allahabad defeated the Indians and by 15 July it was clear that Nana Sahib would not be able to hold Cawnpore and a decision was made by Nana Sahib and other leading rebels that the hostages must be killed.
After the sepoys refused to carry out this order, two Muslim butchers, two Hindu peasants and one of Nana’s bodyguards went into the Bibigarh. Armed with knives and hatchets, they murdered the women and children.[118]
After the massacre, the walls were covered in bloody hand prints, and the floor littered with parts of human limbs.[119] The dead and the dying were thrown down a nearby well. When the 50-foot (15 m) deep well was filled with remains to within 6 feet (1.8 m) of the top,[120] the remainder were thrown into the Ganges.[121]
[…] The killing of the women and children hardened British attitudes against the sepoys. The British public was aghast and the anti-Imperial and pro-Indian proponents lost all their support. “Cawnpore” became a war cry for the British and their allies for the rest of the conflict. The rebel leader Nana Sahib disappeared near the end of the rebellion, and it is not known what happened to him..
.
In a famous painting by the Russian Vasily Vereshchagin, the British execute “rebel” prisoners for maximum gore by shooting a whole cannonball through their back.
And this was on top of what the Crown took directly from Indian taxpayers to pay for its wars. As Patnaik points out, “the cost of all Britain’s wars of conquest outside Indian borders were charged always wholly or mainly to Indian revenues.”
And that’s not all. Britain used this flow of tribute from India to finance the expansion of capitalism in Europe and regions of European settlement, like Canada and Australia. So not only the industrialisation of Britain but also the industrialisation of much of the Western world was facilitated by extraction from the colonies.
Patnaik identifies four distinct economic periods in colonial India from 1765 to 1938, calculates the extraction for each, and then compounds at a modest rate of interest (about 5 percent, which is lower than the market rate) from the middle of each period to the present. Adding it all up, she finds that the total drain amounts to $44.6 trillion. This figure is conservative, she says, and does not include the debts that Britain imposed on India during the Raj.
These are eye-watering sums. But the true costs of this drain cannot be calculated. If India had been able to invest its own tax revenues and foreign exchange earnings in development – as Japan did – there’s no telling how history might have turned out differently. India could very well have become an economic powerhouse. Centuries of poverty and suffering could have been prevented.
All of this is a sobering antidote to the rosy narrative promoted by certain powerful voices in Britain. The conservative historian Niall Ferguson has claimed that British rule helped “develop” India. While he was prime minister, David Cameron asserted that British rule was a net help to India.
This narrative has found considerable traction in the popular imagination: according to a 2014 YouGov poll, 50 percent of people in Britain believe that colonialism was beneficial to the colonies.
Yet during the entire 200-year history of British rule in India, there was almost no increase in per capita income. In fact, during the last half of the 19th century – the heyday of British intervention – income in India collapsed by half. The average life expectancy of Indians dropped by a fifth from 1870 to 1920. Tens of millions died needlessly of policy-induced famine.
Britain didn’t develop India. Quite the contrary – as Patnaik’s work makes clear – India financially developed Britain.
The British army uniform in India in 1941
What does this require of Britain today? An apology? Absolutely. Reparations? Perhaps – although there is not enough money in all of Britain to cover the sums that Patnaik identifies. In the meantime, we can start by setting the story straight. We need to recognise that Britain retained control of India not out of benevolence but for the sake of plunder and that Britain’s industrial rise didn’t emerge sui generis from the steam engine and strong institutions, as our schoolbooks would have it, but depended on violent theft from other lands and other peoples.
This article was originally published by “Al Jazeera”
…..HUMOR
….. The whites were never the parasites !
The US was once 13 British colonies — and their growth from 1619 on depended on the hard work, the courage (we faced vicious Indians, AND the French, Dutch and Spanish empires, all implanted also in North America ) and the brains, planning and innovative mindset of the local white people here (and some black slaves). No money from India flowed to us pioneer American stock; that only began flowing after 1765 and it went to London and the parasitical Judeo-Norman ruling class.
I should know this early American history well, for my ancestor Thomas Angell came here to help found the colony of Rhode Island from England in 1635, and both my mother, Constance Angell Colwell, and father, James Waddell Nugent, descended through different branches from Angell.
A famous painting of the Pilgrims; note the wife clutching her husband’s arm and looking warily at the woods before them. Amerindians — a mix of neanderthals and mongols — routinely made war on each other or on the White settlers for the sole purpose of capturing prisoners and torturing them to death for “fun.”
Within 150 years, a land that had been just woods, swamps — and Stone-Age Indians who had never invented the wheel, nor written language, nor the sail, became prosperous and civilized. Then, through the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, government was to be controlled by the people, not some gang of parasitical British aristocrats. After 1776, no American one had to doff his hat and bow when Lord Haughtyeye rode by in his carriage.
Thomas Angell gave the land for this beautiful church, the first (Ana)-Baptist Church in the thirteen colonies. (Anabaptists were persecuted severely in Europe for saying forthrightly that babies should NOT be baptized, since they obviously were incapable of making an intelligent decision about joining any religion.) Rhode Island became the first beacon of religious freedom for any and all Christians of any denomination, AND the Indians, for generations, were well-treated too, that is, until Massachusetts Puritans, Calvinists, also moved into RI and then began breaking agreements with them and even sent them as “gifts” cholera-infected blankets to cause epidemics. King Philip’s War of 1675-78 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Philip%27s_War) was the bloody result, when the Indians burned a thousand farmhouses and barns in New England down and slaughtered hundreds of Whites — and then were savagely repressed themselves.
The interior oof this church…. The Protestants (except the Anglicans, who stayed close to Catholicism) wanted minimal adornment of their places of worship, and felt that money should be plowed back into the economy, building it up, not into pouring gold, silver and jewels into churches.
The First Baptist Church of Providence is located on the steeply hilly East Side of Providence, the capital of “Rhode Island and Providence Plantations.”
.
My late wife Margi’s ancestor, Jacob Hochstettler, came in 1738 to Pennsylvania from Markirch/St. Marie-aux-Mines, Alsace, a German area that now is part of eastern France. The Germans, being white, highly skilled, honest, and having a great work ethic, were mostly accepted very well by a young, English-speaking frontier nation that needed exactly these traits. Rather quickly, Germans began intermarrying with the British settlers. (This is how the name “Hochstetter” become the English-sounding “Huffstickler.” 😉 )
Colonial America was certainly NOT built up by money stolen from the East Indians — but by our own Aryan smarts, blood, spirit of sacrifice, sweat — and Christian ethics!
.
And when I was a kid, everywhere I saw white people hard at work everywhere! Only ngrs loafed! I remember very well, and so did Margi, as late as the 1960s, how, if one man did a huge favor for another man in need, he gratefully responded: “Thank you so much. That was damn White [noble and decent] of you!”
Elvis Presley and his parents in Mississippi
.
.
It was the crooked Dutchman and probable murderer who falsely called himself “Colonel Tom Parker” who got Elvis to 1) dye his blond English hair black to please the entertainment.industry jews, who 2) took half his earnings, and 3) got him on the drugs that finally killed him.
Elvis, blondish, pre-shoe polish hair, at Hume High School in Memphis
Elvis was a good soldier in the US Army in Germany (https://www.german-way.com/notable-people/featured-bios/elvis-presley-in-germany/) in 1958-60, and became very fond of the Germans for rebuilding their devastated country in record time and their honesty, neatness, frankness, and hard work.
The Germans liked Elvis, too.
.
.
Trump, half-German and half-Scottish/British, toyed with running for president long before 2016, but the RINOS, like turtle-faced, Chinese-married Senator Mitch McConnell, were already thumbs-down back then on him for saying heretical, if mild pro-white things like this:
Trump was a complete fool as president to think the jews would ever embrace him, no matter what he did for Israel. A recent study says only 20% of jews voted for him in 2020 despite four years of degrading bootlicking.
.
.
…..spiritual reading for June 28
There will literally be many blessings raining down on your world today. Do not expect them all to take the form of blessings as you know them. Instead, use your deepest wisdom to fnd out where the goodness and the grace lie.
It is actually in the seeking of the grace that you will find it. Coming upon a $100 bill is not much of a gift if you are unable to understand and receive its underlying purpose. And that will be different for each of you. But be careful to look beneath the surface for the real blessings. When something appears as a good thing, it is easy to take it at face value.
You are more adept at delving into the meaning of misfortune, but today, in the mix of good and hard luck that will befall many of you, seek always for the divine hand.
It will be there in great force. Everything that happens today for you is there as an offering, something you can use and become greater with. This is generally true, and today there will be a downpour of tools, gifts, blessings—all that you need to take you to the next step in your personal evolution.
Extend the gratitude you felt yesterday (which we do so hope you did) to the very process of growth and change and illumination in which you are engaged. Extend that gratitude so that it reaches every corner of your world. Trust that all is perfect and that you, as an integral part of the whole, are also perfect. Let
that be enough.
Stay alert and awake. Open your eyes, your ears, your nose, your heart, your mind. Drink in all that is being made available to you. Take it in, use it, enjoy it or sufer it, but don’t leave it along the way. Pick up the gems that are falling all around you and learn their stories, their lessons.
Get up early, spend your day consciously and make the most of it. We hope you will. You are in the midst of a short time when doors are opening and much is given in the way of assistance. Please hold out your hands for it.
We love you and bless you too.
Not that Anglos are my favorite White ethnic group, but understanding of what diseases were was not advanced enough in the 1600’s to plan out genocide. Even with advanced weaponry like blankets 😉
Thank you. You are probably correct.
https://www.history.com/news/colonists-native-americans-smallpox-blankets