Huge box-office success of anti-pedo film “Sound of Freedom” — unhappy jews starting false rumors to hurt it; my words to Churchill in hell

Spread the love

A Texas comrade and repeat generous donor sent me this image on VK (the Russian answer to Facebook) as a PM (private message), having found it on Twitter.

I wrote him back on VK:

***

As for this story of “vials of nanobots at AMC for screenings of ‘Sound of Freedom’ — I did some research on this…… It is, first of all, clear as a bell that (((“certain people”))) truly do not like this anti-pedophile film….

Wiki says the (((critics))) dislike the film  but audiences (the goyim) love it:

***

Sound of Freedom is a 2023 American action film directed and co-written by Alejandro Monteverde, and stars Jim CaviezelMira Sorvino, and Bill Camp. Caviezel plays Tim Ballard, a former government agent who embarks on a mission to rescue children from sex traffickers in Colombia.[4] It is produced by Eduardo Verástegui, who also plays a role in the film. The plot centers around Ballard’s Operation Underground Railroad, though some commentators have questioned its accuracy.

The film was released on July 4, 2023, by Angel Studios, and has grossed $85 million worldwide against a $14.5 million budget. It received mixed reviews from critics,[5][6][7][8] while audience reception has been highly positive.

[…] VarietyOwen Gleiberman gave the film a positive review, writing, “Let’s assume that, like me, you’re not a right-wing fundamentalist conspiracy theorist looking for a dark, faith-based suspense film to see over the holiday weekend. (The movie opens July 3.) Even then, you needn’t hold extreme beliefs to experience Sound of Freedom as a compelling movie that shines an authentic light on one of the crucial criminal horrors of our time, one that Hollywood has mostly shied away from.[24] 

Film Threats Alan Ng also recommended the film: “Sound of Freedom is almost as if you’re listening to Tim Ballard tell his incredible story of rescuing children and having it dramatized onscreen. It’s heartfelt, informative, and inspiring.[25]

***

Wikipedia itself admits that the film was completed and ready to show to the public way back in 2018 (!), five long years ago, but when (((Disney))) bought out Twentieth Century Fox, they “shelved it.” (Hmmmm!)

So why? Is “The Sound of Freedom” just not good enough? Nope.

Is Jim Caviezel not a big-enough star and not a big draw? Well, nope to that too.

“The Passion” (2004) by Mel Gibson, showing  Jesus’s crucifixion, with Christ played by said Jim Caviezel, had a budget of $30 million and, at the box office, took in $612.1 million. So it made back 19 times what it cost…. Wow.

And Caviezel (this is a Basque name, btw, from this mysterious pre-Indo-European white people who are found in northeast Spain and southwestern France ) has remained a star since then and was one even before “The Passion.”

He played memorably the confused soldier in “The Thin Red Line” (1998) who after deserting returns and sacrifices his life. (He makes a loud noise to draw a large Japanese military unit toward himself and away from his fellow American soldiers. Then he sensibly goes for his rifle to get them to shoot him dead right away — this so he will not be first horribly tortured and then killed, something the Japanese often did to prisoners, as my own father, a WWII Marine, confirmed.)

“The Thin Red Line” was a truly excellent, if slow-moving, film starring Nick Nolte and Sean Penn —  the big-nosed jew playing a US Army sergeant who was a convinced atheist and nihilist, btw — plus Jim Caviezel, and it had powerful music as well by Hans Zimmer.

Trailer:

For me, this film is about earthlings not understanding that their soul lives on after physical death.

Most so-called Christians just do not really accept as true the Pauline-Christian idea of going at death either to heaven or hell — and so these soldiers/Marines feel utter horror that in seconds they could die forever as they charge the ferocious Japanese enemy…go into extinction, into blackness, into nothing, into the end of consciousness, all of which is a delusion, and a satanic and total lie.

The British aristocrat Winston Spencer Churchill, a psychopathic, bisexual, alcoholic, spendthrift, pedophilic monster, confided to friends that, for him, he expected death (which got him in 1965) to be “a cool, silky blackness.”

 

Was Hitler-hater Churchill yet another narcissistic, upper-class British homosexual?

The idea that death is simply “The End” is radically wrong.

But after bombing Hamburg and Dresden, I can see why this war-mongering  son-of-a-bitch would WANT to think that — HOPING that there is no divine retribution after death for all his mass murders. (See more below.)

 

.

 

 

 

Some comments underneath this trailer

When I first saw this movie it was a disappointment to me after saving private Ryan. Thought it was slow and kinda boring. Just rewatched it for the first time in 20 years. What an idiot I was. This film is a masterpiece. Beautiful and tragic at the same time. To me it shows what a disgusting and cruel act war is upon nature and humans. And Witt sees what life could be like without hate or war in the world. I was in tears several times watching it. One of the best movies ever made.

1.1K

This is probably the most underrated movie of all time. The cinematography, editing and score are masterpieces. It’s a stunning, tragic and beautiful film.

134

In 2012 I was in Afghanistan. This is the only war film I personally feel that captures the anxiety and dread that I felt before crossing the line of departure into battle. For me, those hours/minutes before the H-hour of an operation were filled only with  thoughts of my own mortality that tormentedly played endlessly in my head, in which I could think of nothing else but my own death until the first round was fired. I look back at this film now and realise how much of a huge impact it still has on me.

112

I saw this movie for the first time in 1998 just after the Cannes film festival and it was already a masterpiece. 22 years later, I watched it again and it is even more powerful-beautiful – every human should see it especially right now. Thank you, Terrence Malick.

40

First time I watched it in 2009, and it’s still one of the best movies I’ve ever seen… A true masterpiece.

441

This film made a huge impression upon me, I wish I’d seen it in the laet 90s and not ten years later. Absolutely beautiful film and absolutely heart-wrenching too. Everyone should see it, especially politicians before they send our boys to die in their wars.

24

When I watched this movie as a kid I didn’t really get it. It felt pretentious. But after I got older and read about [the battle of] Guadacanal, and the various philosophies of war, this movie suddenly became far and away one of the most memorable and profound movies I had ever seen. Add the incredible music and amazing performances, and I hope I will be able to rewatch this many times in the future.

33

@thenacanoroc
Not a war movie…but a movie about war. It’s pure poetry conveyed through film and it’s soundtrack..(another perfect score by Hans Zimmer) Probably one of the best damn movies I’ve ever seen.
.
***
So anyway this actor, Jim Caviezel, is clearly an established star and a huge box-office plus.

Then did Disney shelve the film for five years because no one in the movie-going public cares any more about saving little kids?

Does the public actually now LIKE child molesters??? ….

As for this “vials of nanobots” story, well, Snopes debunks it on several grounds, since both photos — the vial and the microscopic cell — are lifted from things having nothing to do with AMC.

AND the clincher is that the originator of the tweet with this rumor admitted it was a lie.

 

….(Snopes, of course, can never be automatically trusted, being Soros-financed, and itself is a disgustingly fake “fact-checker.”)…..

So this Hollywood type, “Mr. Nasty No Drama,” admits he started this rumor, this “lie,” in his own words…..

There is a theory (which might be true) that powerful billionaire pedos are getting their minions to actually spread scary or at least negative rumors to scare people away from seeing the film… such as the vial of nanobots, or the story that the air conditioning goes out in AMC movie theaters during this specific movie (in the sweltering month of July….) so the theater becomes a sweat box.

I am sure that Texans would enjoy in the sweltering month of July the AC as much as the movie itself! 😉

I may force myself to watch this movie, because here in Ontonagon I have overheard people talking about it, and whatever the masses are discussing (and they praise the movie) is relevant to my mission.

But it is excruciating for me personally as a survivor of these pedophilic human turds.

Still, way back in 2015 I realized that there is one healthy taboo that is still intact, thank God — EXTREME anger over the rape of little kids.

This is something that is SO vile that the Big Jews have not yet been able to “normalize” it with all their satanic talk about “minor attraction” as being a kind of “sexual orientation” that we must come to understand and “tolerate,” yes, a “misunderstood form of love”!!! “Man-boy love”…..

This is the solution for that:

As for the movie “Sound of Freedom,” yes, the theme is good….

But the pedos are not just abducting Hispanic kids!

The Jewish pedos are also specifically targeting little white, blond kids!!! Like ME as a kid!

But this movie is at least helping the public get their big toe wet on this horrible topic.

Trailer:

 

IF a film were done on the targeting of blond kids, THAT would raise a huge question as to what specific group hates whites in general and nordics specifically……and (((Disney))) might be “uncomfortable” about that!

Macaulay Culkin says Hollywood child stars killed & skinned, then made into shoes! Can it be true? Mystery death at 11 of Heather O’Rourke, star of Spielberg’s “Poltergeist”

.

…..Me to Winnie

“Sir” Winston Churchill, between swigs from his whiskey bottle, understood everything perfectly well and even said it all right in public (or in various private letters to his Aryan friends), but always he kissed up to the jews so his career would go forward.

Most Americans have no idea that much of Britain loathed this man.

Oh my, oh my, tell the wokies! he was actually a white supremacist…. (that is, back when everyone else was)….

…and an antisemite (or more their bootlicker)…

War is fun for haughty aristocrats (and he was one, serving in the House of Commons — commoners — only because it had more power, especially financial)

He would know. The British Army had files on him saying he was a homosexual himself.

Islamophobic! (It all was true, btw.) 


null

*** Gee, Winnie, then in your next incarnation you’ll just love the London of today with its muslim Paki mayor.

Sadiq Khan, militant muslim mayor of the capital of Britain

The bobbies know today just who the real troublemakers are… the British people.

 

***

You with another professional liar

.

Oh, I was such a tyrant, a “guttersnipe,” an enemy of freedom and democracy, etc. but this is what you really thought about democracy (and, once again, you were right).

.

You knew with crystal clarity (especially as Home Secretary 1910-11, in charge of domestic security), that the jew Marx started, and other jews have run, largely led, promoted and financed communism since its inception in 1843.

You knew I was only a patriot serving my country AND that I wanted peace and friendship with Great Britain, and that I advocated an Anglo-German alliance in Mein Kampf !

Oh, the “international bankers,” eh? Sounds like Alex Jones. Do they by any chance avoid pork and work on the Sabbath?

null

I made 72 peace offerings to Britain.

Whatever happened to this soul when Churchill died in 1965 at 90?

He had consciously chosen the jews early in his career, and thus he had knowingly chosen evil.

He advised me in 1932 in a Munich hotel, via my press secretary, to drop the antisemitism in my own interest. In his greed for money, ever paramount, he got himself bailed out financially when going bankrupt, just a few years later, by the South African jew, “Sir” Henry Rakosch.

Thus he kept ahold of his manor, “Chartwell,” and could continue buy his top-shelf whiskey and cigars.

Then, by such an amazing concidence, he went all-out war-monger against Germany.

Maybe God reincarnated him as a Rotherham girl!

….“Darkest Hour” shows Churchill and the Norman-British ruling class at their most degenerate

I watched “Darkest Hour,” the jew movie glorifying Winston Churchill and being showered with Oscars and Golden Globes. How appropriate that in it a jew, Ben Mendelsohn, played the anti-German King George VI.

Although this king’s own brother, the unfortunately abdicated George VIII, was Germany’s friend, his successor, Edward VI, is a vile coward who, for the sake of preserving the monarchy from the wrath of the jews, joins in with the media’s blind hatred of Hitler, and thus he selects Churchill, the fanatical enemy of peace, as prime minister.

I was pleasantly surprised to see Churchill (played very well by Gary Oldman) portrayed accurately — in many negative and disgusting ways.

But then again, nowadays the woke jewsmedia are also denouncing him as an imperialist, islamophobe and racist, so the gloves are off now on Winnie,  though his hatred of me is still okay.

Warmongering Labour leader and jew-stooge Clement Atlee demands in Parliament that Neville Chamberlain step down as prime minister after the huge defeats of May 1940 (in Norway, Holland, Belgium and France) . 

.

Not one of these idiots in the London ochlocracy asks the real question — if this war against Hitler, a friend of Britain and especially of its empire (as my book Mein Kampf said over and over and over!)  was a wise idea.

Their only thought was who can wage the war better , and who can drag the Americans the quickest into their madness.

Churchill with his 1930s assistant, the homosexual Robert Boothby

Infamous London gangster Ronnie Kray, jewish, with his gay lover ,”Lord” Boothby, who was part-jewish….


What a nice jewish boy Boothby’s boyfriend was.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kray_twins

Excerpt:

Ronald “Ronnie” Kray (24 October 1933 – 17 March 1995) and Reginald “Reggie” Kray (24 October 1933 – 1 October 2000), twin brothers, were British criminals, the foremost perpetrators of organised crime in the East End of London during the 1950s and 1960s. With their gang, known as “The Firm”, the Krays were involved in murderarmed robberyarsonprotection rackets and assaults.

The Krays were arrested on 8 May 1968 and convicted in 1969, as a result of the efforts of detectives led by Detective Superintendent Leonard “Nipper” Read. Each was sentenced to life imprisonment. Ronnie remained in Broadmoor Hospital until his death on 17 March 1995 [….]

Military service

The Krays were called up to do National Service in the British Army in March 1952. Although the pair reported to the depot of the Royal Fusiliers at the Tower of London, they attempted to leave after only a few minutes. When the corporal in charge tried to stop them, he was seriously injured by Ronnie Kray, who punched him on the jaw. The Krays walked back to their East End home. They were arrested the next morning by the police and turned over to the army.[10]

In September while absent without leave (AWOL) again, they assaulted a police constable who tried to arrest them. They became among the last prisoners to be held at the Tower of London before being transferred to Shepton Mallet military prison in Somerset for a month to await court-martial.

After they were convicted, both were sent to the Buffs‘ Home Counties Brigade Depot jail in CanterburyKent. However, when it became clear they were both to be dishonourably discharged from the army, the Krays’ behaviour became worse.

They dominated the exercise areas outside their one-man cells, threw tantrums, emptied a latrine bucket over a sergeant, dumped a canteen full of hot tea on another guard, handcuffed a guard to their prison bars with a pair of stolen cuffs and set their bedding on fire.[11][12]

Eventually, they were moved to a communal cell where they assaulted their guard with a vase and escaped. After being quickly recaptured, they spent their last night in military custody in Canterbury drinking cider, eating crisps and smoking cigarillos courtesy of the young national servicemen acting as their guards.

The next day the Krays were transferred to a civilian prison to serve sentences for the crimes they committed while AWOL.

 “I want you to write this down – and I want you to say that I am proud to have Jewish blood and that I am also proud to be homosexual. Have you got that?” (https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/i-interviewed-krays-here-blood-6405389)

***

I made 72 desperate peace offers to Britain in 1939-41 to 1) create a formal alliance with the British Empire, and then 2) focus my Wehrmacht entirely on the ONE gigantic task I had set myself in Mein Kampf, the crushing of communism by the surprise invasion of Stalin’s massive USSR.

I over and over preached that the Germans and Anglo-Saxons were brother peoples and the British Empire was essential to the white race, or China would rule the world. I offered that if the British Empire had any military troubles anywhere on the globe, I would offer to send German troops in Royal Navy ships to aid Great Britain. Churchill rejected it.

Brothers — why did we fight? 

The Norman aristocrat of the Spencer clan is portrayed accurately as drinking morning, noon and night, which he did (just as I and Goebbels pointed out tirelessly during the war).

It was a life of endless privilege, heedless of the lot of the British working people.

Scene from the 1940 movie about the life of Welsh coal miners; “How Green Was My Valley” 

Winston pulls up at Buckingham Palace in a Rolls-Royce so the king can make him prime minister

It is shown clearly in this film how Churchill’s own party, the Conservatives, was full of people who saw him as both a good orator and also a man of terrible judgment and a blind war monger.

Among them were the foreign minister, Lord Halifax; the prime minister, Neville Chamberlain; and, initially, King George VI as well.

….Two different trailers for the movie, each showing disgusting and even bizarre aspects of the man

.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J23Fj17bDyM

“We shall never surrender” — except to the jews, gays, pedophiles, Indians, Americans, muslims, and Chinese.

.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgUrH19GxbI

“We shall defend our island” but not from a negro and muslim invasion!

…..Callous snob

There are also telling scenes such as the one where his secretary, Miss Elizabeth Layton, shows him a photo of her brother in uniform, missing in action in France and presumed dead.

The narcissist Churchill just stares at her, and offers no words of comfort or consolation. (He seems to be pondering if she would be a security risk as an “anti-war” person.)

…..Weird nudism

Then there is this episode, the obese Churchill standing nude in front of this same female secretary.  (The strange maniac also did this in the White House in Washington DC to President Franklin Roosevelt!)

….”My Problem with Darkest Hour Involves a Bathtub, a Man, and His Penis”

 by Charles Mudede

[source: https://www.thestranger.com/film/2017/12/20/25633435/my-problem-with-darkest-hour-involves-a-bathtub-a-man-and-his-penis]

Gary Oldman as Churchill

[Excerpts]
.
…we hear lots and lots of Churchill. He does not stop talking, dictating, giving speeches.

Indeed, I can’t recall one moment in the whole movie when Churchill, played by Gary Oldman, is quiet and trying to think something through. He has no thoughts.

He only has a mouth that’s supported by a plump but obviously fake second chin. (Oldman is much too thin for the portly, whisky-swilling, cigar-puffing prime minister.)

My main problem with Darkest Hour, however, is a disturbing scene that happens somewhere in the middle of the movie and involves Churchill and his young and conventionally attractive secretary, Elizabeth Layton (Lily James).

What happens is this: Churchill is taking a bath and dictating something of great importance to his secretary through a closed door. Layton is in the hall, where she has set up a little table and a clunky typewriter.

Then Churchill suddenly announces that he is leaving the bathroom “in a state of nature” and that his young secretary should get ready for it. It’s going to happen. He is a busy man. He doesn’t have time to get dressed.

And out he walks as naked as Adam. The secretary lowers her eyes and keeps typing. This scene is supposed to be cutesy, but in our #MeToo moment, it looks exactly like what it is: sexual harassment.

This is not a laughing matter. An old and powerful man is forcing the sight of his penis on a powerless young woman without her consent.ry before it’s released. recommended [end]

.

.

.

…….Nice screenshots, anyway, which I made from the film showing the old, white and properly dressed-up London of 1940 (a country from “long ago and far away”)

.

.

.

……Psychopathy in our leaders (religious, political, financial, and in entertainment)

When I think now of Dwight Eisenhower, it is the same thing.

An arrogant prick at West Point who knows he is in good with the Big Jews; in WWI, unlike the other officers, he avoided combat. This young, impressionable cadet of German blood (no, not a jew at all) got sucked into “the high life” under the aegis of jewish financier Bernard Baruch.

.

Bernard Baruch 

.

With his two puppets, one PM of the UK, the other US president

.

The Kansan Eisenhower, son of a pacifist mnother, KNEW that serving the jews was wicked, but did it anyway! He had sold his soul to the devils! Here he is, lying to one of his best old teenage friends, who was worried about jewish power over America:

https://johndenugent.com/english/they-hacked-my-psychopaths-in-power-article-here-it-is-again/

.

 

2 Comments

  1. Yes, Churchill was a warmongering maniac. An old mate of mine lent me a book by the Australian author David Day called Menzies and Churchill at War.

    It shows that there were attempts in the British political establishment to remove Churchill from power and replace him with the Conservative Prime Minister of Australia, Bob Menzies. Prime Minister Menzies was open to ending the war with Germany by a negotiated settlement. Indeed, there was an amusing section of the book were the Australian Prime Minister met Mr Churchill at his home. Churchill was so drunk he could hardly walk, and Prime Minister Menzies said ‘Winston, you are drinking too much alcohol. It is starting to affect your brain.’

    Churchill become hysterical with rage. A shocked Menzies left the drunken madman Churchill and spoke with his Australian advisors. He told them point-blank that Churchill was completely insane.

    • Thank you very much, Australian comrade.

      I looked this book up on Amazon, and found:

      ***

      From Publishers Weekly
      Australian historian Day presents startling evidence that Australian prime minister Robert Menzies sought to remove Winston Churchill from power during World War II. Early in the war Menzies believed that Churchill was about to subordinate Britain in an alliance with the Americans that would supersede the Empire that he was “selling out” Great Britain to ensure victory over the Nazis. Menzies favored a negotiated peace. Angered by Churchill’s unwillingness to divert defense resources to Australia and shaken by Britain’s military defeats in Greece and the Middle East, Menzies agitated for a Dominion-inclusive war cabinet in London. As a member of that cabinet he hoped to remove Churchill from his position of undisputed power and rescue the Empire from apparent catastrophe. Day describes how Churchill, with the crucial support of Canadian prime minister Mackenzie King, blocked Menzies’ path before the imminent showdown. Photos.

      ***

      And I read also this comment:

      ***

      By our era most British Commonwealth leaders in 1941 have had their history rewritten to fit into a more political desirable form. As such we are given very little about the conflicts and doubts that must have gone though their minds at this time when it looked like Hitler had won.

      Two great leaders, Churchill and Menzies, in the British conflict appear to have come into conflict over the conduct of the war. To Churchill, WW2 became a crusade that he was willing to give all in an attempt to defeat Hitler.

      To Menzies the British Empire was both incompetently being led by Churchill, which, as the book shows, is probably correct in the gross failure of the British handling of the war in Greece and getting involved in a conflict that it could not win.

      He felt that the British Commonwealth should make terms with Hitler.

      In an attempt to replace Churchill, Menzies lost his position as prime minister of Australia.

      Mixed in with their respective egos and ambitions it makes fascinating reading.

      Wiki on Menzies, who was born of Australian parents of Scottish and Cornish heritage:

      Sir Robert Gordon Menzies KT AK CH QC FAA FRS (20 December 1894 – 15 May 1978) was an Australian politician who was the 12th and longest-serving prime minister of Australia, holding office from 1939 to 1941 and again from 1949 to 1966. He played a central role in the creation of the Liberal Party of Australia, defining its policies and its broad outreach.

      ***

      In apparent confirmation of what you wrote, comrade, Wiki says:

      ***

      Professor David Day, an Australian historian, has posited that Menzies might have replaced Churchill as British prime minister, and that he had some support in the UK for this. Support came from Viscount Astor, Lord Beaverbrook and former WWI Prime Minister David Lloyd George,[53] who were trenchant critics of Churchill’s purportedly autocratic style, and favoured replacing him with Menzies, who had some public support for staying on in the War Cabinet for the duration, which was strongly backed by Sir Maurice Hankey, former WWI Colonel and member of both the WWI and WWII War Cabinets. Writer Gerard Henderson has rejected this theory, but history professors Judith Brett and Joan Beaumont support Day, as does Menzies’s daughter, Heather Henderson, who claimed Lady Astor “even offered all her sapphires if he would stay on in England”.[53]

      ***

      It saddens me that even a basically good and able chap such as Menzies would not simply educate himself as to WHY Adolf Hitler and Sis Germany were so “antisemitic.” It was not just about Germany and its war aims, but about the ultimate fate of all white people everywhere, including in Oz, and ascertaining how the Jews really feel about us — their hatred and desire to enslave or exterminate us!– as their Talmud clearly reveals!

      And all this information was quite available in 1940 to Mr, Menzies and it was all published in English, not just in German, French or Russian!

      No one can tell me that Menzies never heard of the world-famous American automaker Henry Ford and his book “The International Jew.”

      And simpLe common sense would confirm to a Menzies exactly what the jew Henry Kissinger said to a fellow jew, Walter Isaacson, in his authorized bio of Kissinger:

      And look at poor Australia today after the total jew takeover…almost all freedoms gone, the land filled with wogs, and instead of a Japanese threat, as in the Menzies years, now there is China.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*