“Idiocracy” is here — people ARE getting much dumber than before

Anyone who has seen the 2006 movie “Idiocracy” (which, however, the jews yanked out of the theaters in one week because of its obvious NS overtones) gets the idea: After centuries of smart people having no kids and dumb people a lot, America is ruled by low-IQ morons.

Like now. 😉

Just read any speech by George Washington and the rich and educated vocabulary he used and compare it with the monosyllabic mumblings of Biden, Trump or Bush. All three talked like fifth-graders.

Read this from George Washington’s 1799 Farewell Address; he was denouncing political parties(which few today know).

Just for shock value, this is how the great man, who, btw, stood 6’3″, had blue eyes (and red hair when younger), would look today in a modern suit and tie.

Bush, Trump and Biden would not even know the meaning of about fifteen words in this speech, and btw, Washington never went to college.

***

I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations.
.
Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.[…]
.
This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind.
.
It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.
.
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.
.
But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual;
.
…and, sooner or later, the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.
.
Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.
.
It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection.
It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption,

…which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions.

Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

Here is the opener of “Idiocracy”:

Some other clips are below: IDIOCRACY Opening Scene (2006) Mike Judge – Bing video

This was a good review of At Wit’s End (by a German, translated into English).

***

An easy to understand introduction to intelligence research that presents the latest findings on 204 pages and over 400 footnotes. Woodley and Dutton argue that we have lost around three IQ points per generation since the Industrial Revolution (around 1850), in other words about 21 points!

The reason is that intelligent people have fewer children than unintelligent ones. Since intelligence is inheritable to 80 percent, as studies with adopted children and identical twins showed, mean intelligence has declined from generation to generation.

In research, this development is already called “the Woodley effect,” according to one of the authors. Dutton and Woodley have been publishing tirelessly in journals such as Evolutionary Psychological Science for years. Woodley has also written scientific monographs on this subject, which have been published in renowned university publishers.

The book shows that our response times have been increasing since 1885 (intelligent people have a more powerful central nervous system) and that since the 1980s we are less likely to distinguish between shades of color (with intelligent people perceiving finer differences).

Studies also show that our vocabulary is getting smaller. (Smart people use a broader vocabulary.) Woodley explored Google’s text archive, which contains millions of digitized texts from the 16th century to the present day. Result: At the beginning of the 19th century, we used more difficult and specific words, which are a good measure of high intelligence. Spatial-visual tests also confirm the decline in intelligence.

Two researchers would have shown independently that the genius rate per capita has been falling since about 1870. The result is fewer macro innovations — so taht while existing technologies are being improved, there are fewer fundamental breakthroughs in science.

The work is written compactly, is easy to understand and gives us the latest studies. In doing so, Dutton and Woodley not only recite research results, but also discuss the German writer Oswald Spengler’s cyclical theory of history and possible countermeasures against the loss of intelligence. Anyone who has read this book understands why around 1800 we experienced our civilizational heyday in Europe, with giants like Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Beethoven, Goethe, Napoleon, etc.

***

I have seen this decline myself because I taught kids as a substitute teacher quite a bit when between jobs from 1981 to 2004, which happened largely because I was a white nationalist. 😉

Over a 23-year period of teaching, I definitely saw kids get dumber, with sort of a matte finish on their eyes. 😉

National socialism means we encourage our best to have BIG families and, because they will master their egoic minds, and understand both male and female psychology, they will be HAPPY families!

.

.

.