The insane, Russophobic hawks John Bolton, Mike Pompeo and Mike Pence (vice-president and thus successor to the presidency in case of Trump’s assassination) surround the president, who seems to not want nuclear war enough. It should be obvious to any older child that taking down the electric grid would collapse the economy of any modern country (including food, water, banking, the Internet and all businesses) and induce mass starvation within days.
.
Obama, a closet bolshevik, homosexual, illegal alien and secret jew via his late mother, Ann Dunham, put in two Jews as head of US Air Force nuclear weapons
….The Danger of Leaving a President Out of the Loop
June 16, 2019 • 71 Comments
[source: https://consortiumnews.com/2019/06/16/the-danger-of-leaving-a-president-out-of-the-loop/]
Donald Trump was kept in the dark about a possible U.S. nuclear response to a Russian cyber-weapon attack. The U.S. has now ramped up offensive cyber-warfare against Russia’s power grid, putting Trump in a deep bind, says Caitlin Johnstone.
By Caitlin Johnstone
The New York Times has published an anonymously sourced report titled “U.S. Escalates Online Attacks on Russia’s Power Grid” about the “placement of potentially crippling malware inside the Russian system at a depth and with an aggressiveness that had never been tried before” which could potentially “plunge Russia into darkness or cripple its military,” with one anonymous official reporting that “We are doing things at a scale that we never contemplated a few years ago.”
Obviously this is yet another serious escalation in the continually mounting series of steps that have been taken into a new cold war between the planet’s two nuclear superpowers. Had a report been leaked to Russian media from anonymous Kremlin officials that Moscow was escalating its cyber-aggressions against America’s energy grid, this would doubtless be labeled an act of war by the political/media class of the US and its allies with demands for immediate retaliation.
To put this in perspective, The New York Times reported last year that the Pentagon was pushing for the U.S. Nuclear Posture Review to include the strategy of retaliating against serious Russian cyberattacks on American power grids with nuclear weapons.
So that’s scary enough. What’s even scarier is the information that the Times buried way down in the 21st to 23rd paragraphs of its report:
“Two administration officials said they believed Mr. Trump had not been briefed in any detail about the steps to place ‘implants’—software code that can be used for surveillance or attack—inside the Russian grid.
“Pentagon and intelligence officials described broad hesitation to go into detail with Mr. Trump about operations against Russia for concern over his reaction—and the possibility that he might countermand it or discuss it with foreign officials, as he did in 2017 when he mentioned a sensitive operation in Syria to the Russian foreign minister.
“Because the new law defines the actions in cyberspace as akin to traditional military activity on the ground, in the air or at sea, no such briefing would be necessary, they added.”
In an article titled “Pentagon Keeps Trump in the Dark About its Cyber Attacks on Russia”, Rolling Stone’s Peter Wade described this jarring revelation as follows:
“New laws, enacted by Congress last year, allow such ‘clandestine military activity’ in cyberspace to go ahead without the president’s approval. So, in this case, those new laws are protecting American interests… by keeping the sitting president out of the loop. What a (scary) time to be alive.”
So Trump is in a bit of a bind now. The escalation has already been put in place, which will likely see an equal response from Moscow if it isn’t scaled back. But scaling it back would mean a whole new wave of shrieking alarmism from the political/media class about the conspiracy theory that just won’t die no matter how much evidence is mounted against it: that Trump is a controlled puppet of the Kremlin. All as he’s working to build the case for re-election in 2020.
We Have Been Warned
Stephen F. Cohen, professor emeritus of Russian studies at New York University and Princeton University and one of America’s leading experts on U.S.-Russia relations, has been warning for years that exactly this would happen. In an April 2017 interview on Democracy Now, Cohen warned that placing political pressure on a U.S. president to never step back from escalations during a showdown between nuclear superpowers could have potentially world-ending consequences should mounting tensions see a situation similar to the Cuban missile crisis again.
Stephen Cohen
.
“I think this is the most dangerous moment in American-Russian relations, at least since the Cuban missile crisis,” Cohen said. “And arguably, it’s more dangerous, because it’s more complex. Therefore, we—and then, meanwhile, we have in Washington these—and, in my judgment, factless accusations that Trump has somehow been compromised by the Kremlin. So, at this worst moment in American-Russian relations, we have an American president who’s being politically crippled by the worst imaginable—it’s unprecedented. Let’s stop and think. No American president has ever been accused, essentially, of treason. This is what we’re talking about here, or that his associates have committed treason.”
“Imagine, for example, John Kennedy during the Cuban missile crisis,” Cohen said. “Imagine if Kennedy had been accused of being a secret Soviet Kremlin agent. He would have been crippled. And the only way he could have proved he wasn’t was to have launched a war against the Soviet Union. And at that time, the option was nuclear war.”
People rarely take time to deeply reflect on the uniquely important fact that our species came within a hair’s breadth of total annihilation during the Cuban missile crisis.
We learned long after it was all over that the only reason a nuclear-armed Soviet submarine didn’t discharge its payload on the U.S. Navy and set off a full-scale nuclear exchange between the U.S. and the USSR was because one of the three men in the sub needed to authorize the weapon’s use stood against the other two and refused.
That man’s name was Vasili Arkhipov, and he’s responsible for the fact that you and everyone you love exists today. There’s a good PBS documentary about the event on YouTube if you’re curious.
Pre-Existing Agendas
President Kennedy was constantly going back and forth in communication with the Soviets during the Cuban missile crisis, and any number of things could have gone cataclysmically wrong during that exchange had Kennedy not made certain concessions at certain times and known when to hold back instead of pressing forward.
He made a series of diplomatic moves that would not be possible in this current paranoid, leak-prone climate, including secretly recalling the USA’s Jupiter missiles from their position in Turkey at Khrushchev’s request.
For all the outrage that liberals display whenever a high-profile Republican utters the phrase “deep state”, it sure is interesting that the Commander-in-Chief has found himself in a situation where he is at the whim of a collective of warmongers who are advancing pre-existing agendas against a nation they perceive as a geostrategic threat to U.S. hegemony. It begs the question, who is really in charge?
The U.S. war machine is the most powerful military force in the history of civilization, and the alliance of nations that it upholds is functionally the most powerful empire that the world has ever seen. Because so much power depends on the behavior of this gargantuan war engine, it is seen by those with real power as too important to be left to the will of the electorate, and too important to be left to the will of the elected Commander-in-Chief.
This is why Americans are the most propagandized people in the world, this is why Russia hysteria has been blasted into their psyches for three years, and this is why we are all at an ever-increasing risk of dying in a nuclear holocaust.
UPDATE: Trump now seems like he might be denying that what The New York Times’ sources said is happening is happening.
Do you believe that the Failing New York Times just did a story stating that the United States is substantially increasing Cyber Attacks on Russia. This is a virtual act of Treason by a once great paper so desperate for a story, any story, even if bad for our Country…..
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 16, 2019
It’s unlikely that the Times would fabricate a story whole cloth, so if Trump is in fact denying the story, then either:
the sources are lying about what they’re doing in their own purported jobs, or
Trump is still being kept in the dark, or
Trump is just lying.
Curiouser and curiouser.
Caitlin Johnstone is a rogue journalist, poet, and utopia prepper who publishes regularly at Medium. Follow her work on Facebook, Twitter, or her website. She has a podcast and a new book “Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.” This article was re-published with permission.
.
.
……See also
…..And
…..The 1917 Nicholas Van Rensburg prophecy of three world wars
.
It marches now toward its fulfillment, ending with the Reich Germans of the Absetzbewegung, the Disengagement Movement, re-emerging from bases under the Antarctic and the Andes mountain chain to rule a world mostly in ashes — in alliance with the Boers who have survived, with sudden Reich-German help, a merciless race war.
.
.
NVR foresaw Britain turns against America, Turkey againt Russia, then Russia invades trueky and the rest of NATO in Europe (as being the weaker party) “in order to get in the first blow.”
.
.
And then (in the quaint 1917 phrase by Van Rensburg) “the horror bombs” go off.
.
.
https://johndenugent.com/english/simon-roche-south-africa-the-coming-all-out-race-war-certain-germans-to-the-rescue-trump-wwiii-and-the-visions-of-the-prophet-nicholas-van-rensburg-100-years-ago
.https://johndenugent.com/images/Jdn-Van-Rensburg-27-June-2018.mp4
.
Van Rensburg predicted that after a black becomes president of South Africa ( = the communist Nelson Mandela, here with his communist, Lithuanian-Jewish adviser, Joe Slovo)
….and also after a black likewise becomes the president of the United States ( = Obama), described as “a black boy,”
….and recall that — back in 1917 — such notions of black presidents seemed absurd and even unimaginable….
…THEN a male, white, older conservative will take over the reins of the state.
.
This white, male conservative will have “hair like a wig,” constantly frown, and he will end up (against his will?) sucked into, and then waging, a catastrophic war against Russia.
.
.
America will be crippled for generations by massive destruction.
Russia too will be almost completely destroyed.
Some European countries as well will be wiped out, especially England, which will break its alliance with the United States and therefore will be abandoned by them. Not one Englishman will survive, van Rensburg predicts.
.
The Soviet nuclear Sakharov Plan was to plant and ignite hydrogen bombs at key places to crack open the crust of the earth, creating a gigantic tsunami that will drown everyone in low-lying England — or the whole, low-lying US East Coast.
.
Andrei Sakharov, later a famous dissident, built the first Soviet hydrogen bomb.
America before WWIII
This movie is based on the actual 2004 tsunami that killed 400,000 people in Thailand, including many white tourists. I am highly suspicious that this was triggered deliberately via an underwater nuclear device — practicing mass killing and population reduction of the hated goyim, as per the openly stated first goal on the Georgia Guidestones, by the jewish Deep State.
.
Ironically, Germans and Boers, supposedly the vanquished ones of history, down in South Africa, will be the only major white survivors of this utterly useless, pointless world war that will destroy the entire northern hemisphere of our planet.
They will build together a new white empire in Africa, which will have remained unscathed from the Third World War.
And these two very tough, smart, warlike white peoples with no racial illusions will crush without mercy any black people who oppose law, order, civilization, and progress.
As far as the Germans are concerned, as I have explained many times on my website, Adolf Hitler ordered, after the great defeat at Stalingrad, the evacuation of the most elite of his German scientists and military down to Antarctica. They have huge under-ice military bases there, and also in the Andes mountain range, in a kind of existence like a badger, protected in their lairs, but not daring to wage war on the United States or Russia (neither against Soviet Russia 1945-91 nor the Yeltsin-Putin Russia of 1991-2018).
The Reich population is only five million, like Finland, Ireland, or the US state of Wisconsin.
Their only option is to wait for WWIII, and for their enemies to destroy each other.
What are Van Rensburg’s prophecies concerning the Tribe, the Jews, who are certainly our worst enemy, not the primitive blacks?
NVR did not mention them. He was a fervent Calvinist Christian, thus a typical Boer, and not anti-Semitic. They all have the Bible on their night table.
Like all Boers, he hated especially the English (who had killed two of his daughters in Lord Kitchener’s horrible concentration camps).
And he loved and admired the Germans.
He prophesied that the Germans would lose two world wars but win, that is, survive — and survive alone — the third world war.
Hitler himself said “Das letzte Battalion wird ein deutsches sein.” (“The last battalion will be German.”) This becomes understandable only if one accepts the reality of the military “Absetzbewegung” of 1943-45, the “disengagement movement”. (“Sich absetzen” in German means “to withdraw your troops.” “He who runs away can live to fight another day.”)
…..And now my first of two 2018 interviews (as host on Resistance Radio) with Simon Roche, activist and spokesman for the Southlanders in South Africa (90 minutes) on WHAT HIS ORGANIZATION WANTS TO DO.
Should Boers plan to stand and fight in place — or evacuate to a safer, more isolated area?
The Southlanders organization (of which Roche, a non-Boer, is the key spokesman to the anglosphere) is operating under explicit international law to protect the white South Africans (both Boers and Brits) by withdrawing — under arms but peacefully — to defensive perimeters in case a full race war breaks out in the nightmarish, black-majority South Africa.
www.resistanceradio.tv
(subscribe!!)
Part 1 of 2
.https://johndenugent.com/images/JdN-Simon-Roche-Van-Rensburg-Part-1-of-2.mp3
Part 2 of 2
.https://johndenugent.com/images/JdN-Simon-Roche-Van-Rensburg-Part-2-of-2.mp3
.
.
Leave a Reply