The boot of social justice has come down hard on the face of the BASED JEW Aaron Schlossberg who bitched out some Hispanics who refused to speak American in a New York restaurant.

We covered the original story in detail yesterday, if you need to catch up.

This is probably the single most aggressive campaign of retribution for a public “racist” outburst I’ve ever seen. Which is weird, because he’s Jewish. But it’s necessary, because they have to make an example of someone to try to bully people into not calling out this Hispanic influx in public – a thing which is becoming increasingly common.

And I think they felt like they needed to do it to a rich professional. Because a “racist uprising” of well-off professional people is exactly what they fear most. The overwhelming majority of people are not even going to be aware of the Jewish angle. And it is impossible for him to claim anti-Semitism here.

You might note that he never actually even said any racial slurs.

He just said “speak English” and implied that the brown people were illegals for whom he was paying welfare.

Life ruination

First, a mob of “journalists” (they are political activists, the term “journalist” no longer has any other meaning) ambushed him outside of his home and chased him down the street.

WATCH THIS.

Some media managed to then follow him into work at the courthouse, to continue stalking and harassing him.

Mind you, this is ostensibly revenge for him calling some people mean names.

Which thing is more reprehensible – mean name-calling or mob stalking of a private citizen who has committed no crime?

This new bizarre form of privately contracted socially-enforced authoritarian thought-control is simply incredible. The sheer scope and weight of it.

And it gets way worse.

They kicked him out of his office.

New York Post:

The 44-year-old was kicked out of his Madison Avenue work space Thursday after he was was captured in a hate-filled rant at Spanish-speaking restaurant workers — and then a Congressman filed a formal complaint to the state court system’s disciplinary committee.

Schlossberg had been using a business center in 275 Madison Ave. as an office address for his private law firm — but has been given the boot over the shocking video that went viral Wednesday.

“We have terminated his services agreement with us,” Hayim Grant, the president of Corporate Suites, which operates the business center, told The Post Thursday, adding that he was “completely shocked” by the nearly minute-long clip.

“His actions are just not consistent with our community and rules and regulations … It’s totally contrary to everything we believe in as a company and personally.”

Are they allowed to terminate a lease because a tenant called someone mean names?

I would assume that the answer to that is “absolutely not,” but it doesn’t really matter to the landlord, because he needs those valuable signaling points. Furthermore, he no doubt pictured a scenario in which the mob turned on him for not kicking this guy out, so he preempted that.

The government is even getting in on all of this.

The news came as Congressman Adriano Espaillat and Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. filed their complaint against Schlossberg to the New York State Unified Court System’s Departmental Disciplinary Committee — calling on the panel to investigate the attorney and possibly revoke his license.

“I stand with Congressman Espaillat in calling for the disciplinary committee of the New York State Unified Court System to examine the attorney identified as Aaron Schlossberg’s reprehensible behavior and review his law license for possible revocation,” said the Bronx borough president.

Again, it cannot be stressed enough: this man is being made example of.

The Jews know that people are on edge, about to blow over all of this immigration. And they want to make an extremely high profile example of someone.

Way, Way, Way Worse Than the Alleged SPLC vs Anglin Case

As the reader is probably aware, I almost never comment on any alleged pending legislation against me.

And I won’t really comment here.

Except to say that what I am allegedly accused of doing – allegedly telling people to call a Jewish woman who it is alleged that I alleged committed a racist act – does not even come close to what these people, led by Shaun King, are doing to Schlossberg.

King’s call to action was explicitly racial in nature, referring to him as an “ugly white” man. Furthermore, he implies directly that Schlossberg didn’t have a right to say these mean words, and that he is taking revenge on him because of it, which is conspiracy to deny Constitutional rights.

He doxed Schlossberg, giving his name, address and phone number, and incited a mob to contact him.

Which they of course did.

They then harassed him outside of his house, following him down the street insulting him, and followed him into his work place – none of that happened to the alleged target of my alleged trollstorm. All she allegedly received was alleged mean phone calls and alleged mean emails.

Furthermore, Shaun King has greater reach than me, so the consequences were much more extreme. I am absolute certain he got fifty times the phone calls that the alleged woman in my alleged situation got.

Schlossberg has also suffered real world financial consequences as a result of the harassment campaign, which will presumably end up totaling in the millions. […]

To be 100% Clear

Unlike Shaun King and the mob who believes it should be illegal to get angry at spics in public, I am an unrepentant free-speech absolutist. So I obviously don’t believe what Shaun King did was illegal.

I am simply pointing out that the alleged case against me is a politically motivated scam and that if it is “the digital equivalent to burning a cross on someone’s front lawn” to post on the internet telling a large number of people to contact an individual over an alleged controversy, Schlossberg has a case that is 100 times better than the alleged case against me.

However, I doubt Schlossberg will sue, because he knows it wasn’t illegal. Just like the SPLC knows what I did wasn’t illegal. They are suing me in a callous politically-motivated attempt to silence my speech, not because they think I did something illegal.

All this having been said – I sure am glad this Schlossberg thing happened. Because it really, really, really puts the ridiculousness of the alleged SPLC suit against me into perspective – on a massive public scale.

Furthermore, I don’t believe it is going to succeed in silencing anyone.

It’s just going to make everyone more angry at the bully nature of the enforcement arm of this “multicultural experiment.”

.

.

……My experience

First, I found it infuriating that that leftist snotface in the courthouse kept calling the lawyer “dude.”

If you want to get on my bad side fast, call me “dude.”

I had a nasty experience with three antifa-type women two years ago, even in this village of 1,400, inebriated women, and they put their fingers in my face and began shouting at me.

In that case, I simply walked away.

Had anyone physically laid a hand on me, I was ready to defend myself, and I am armed. One of the women had a boyfriend and former soldier with her.

In another incident, three locals have seen me with pistol out after I was accosted at my own home — and know it is no bluff.

I also made a full written report to the sheriff and discussed it with the sheriff at my home. It was a culmination of a lot of things. Coming to my home was the last straw.