What was the precise meaning of the term, “Habiru,” in its original context? And for that matter, was the term actually “Habiru,” or rather “Apiru”? These questions need to be answered in order to address the larger question of the relationship between the terms “Habiru” and “Hebrew.”

For many decades after the tablets from Tell el-Amarna and elsewhere were first unearthed, no one doubted that they made reference to people called “Habiru.” In the English language translation of the Tell el-Amarna tablets published by Samuel Mercer in 1939, the term “Habiru” is used without any hint of the possibility of a different reading. By the way, in an “Excursus” at the end of the book, on page 843, F. H. Hallock stated:

.

But we must admit some association between Hebrews and Habiru; linguistic and historical considerations make this inevitable, even though in the light of present-day knowledge we cannot speak with too great certainty concerning that association. ….

.

Biblical scholars are generally agreed as to who the Habiru were, but there is a certain range of opinion as to how they were perceived. Bottero thought “refugee” was the most accurate term, while Weippert preferred “outlaw.” The one trait that defined the Habiru as a group is that they stood outside the established social order both literally – they camped on the outskirts of the settled areas – and figuratively. 

.

But there were evidently degrees of difference from one place to another as to how antagonistic was their relationship to that order. If they served as mercenaries, they might have a relationship to the state that was defined by some kind of formal agreement. Some Biblical scholars believe that they were generally seen as “foreigners,” whereas others emphasize their status as “fugitives.” There is no obvious reason for preferring one term over another, since all of them undoubtedly have some basis in fact.

.

However, a clue to how the term “Habiru” was generally understood in the 2nd millenium BCE is provided by the existence of similar terms in other Middle Eastern languages. In particular there is the Sumerian expression, “SA.GAZ”. I don’t know enough about Sumerian hieroglyphics to understand why it is written this way, but since that is how most Biblical scholars write it, I am following suit. The Sumerians were a people whose ethnic and linguistic background is not well understood and who were settled in the southern part of what is now Iraq by the time that they developed a hieroglyphic writing system around 3000 BCE.

***** JdN: this is bull! The Sumerians, and rulers of Babylon, were a WHITE people!

******

The Accadian writing system was derived from the Sumerian and it also took over the Sumerian term “SA.GAZ”, which was widely used in Accadian texts, including the Tell el-Amarna tablets, as a synonym for “Habiru.” Bottero, on page 82, notes that the two terms were used alternately in texts unearthed at Boghazkoy, the capital of the Hittite empire in what is now Turkey, and the Biblical scholars all agree that the meaning of the two terms was more or less identical.According to Bottero, on page 149, the root meaning of SA.GAZ in its original Sumerian context “is pejorative and indicates a violent and criminal act of aggression, and most often the perpetrator of that aggression” [my translation].

.

Hence Bottero thought that “SA.GAZ” should be translated as “brigand” despite the fact that he also thought that “refugee” was the best translation for “Habiru.” But this contradiction is more apparent than real, for it would appear that the Habiru were refugees (or fugitives) who became brigands.

 

This is precisely the conclusion suggested by an article by Nadav Na’aman, “Habiru-like Bands in the Assyrian Empire and Bands in Biblical Historiography”, appearing in Volume 1 of his Collected Essays. In Assyrian inscriptions dating from the 7th and 8th centuries BCE there are references to a group called “urbi” in the Assyrian language. The meaning of the term has been variously given as “fugitives,” “bandits,” “irregular troops,” “a special type of soldiery” or “elite troops.” According to Na’aman, the term “urbi” was derived from a verb, “merubu”, which meant “to flee, run away, escape.” Na’aman continued as follows, on page 299:

The term urbi refers to groups of fugitives who, in the face of Assyrian military campaigns, destructions or annexations, fled from their homeland and found shelter in peripheral areas. These uprooted people tried to adapt themselves to new circumstances by forming a band under the command of a prominent leader. The bands were independent armed bodies, restricted in number and characterized by their predatory nature and military ability. Often they became dangerous to sedentary and pastoral societies. Thanks to their military ability they served on occasion as mercenaries in the armies of neighboring rulers.

And Na’aman concludes: “All of these characteristics are typical of the bands of Habiru, which are so well known from late third-and second-millenium BCE ancient Near Eastern documents.”The important point which emerges from all this is that for the people who wrote and read the texts in which terms like “SA.GAZ” or “Habiru” or “urbi” appear, all of these terms must have had a negative connotation. Sometimes this connotation became explicit, as in one of the Tell el-Amarna letters, appearing on page 261 of Mercer’s translation, where one Canaanite official says of another that he has become just like the SA.GAZ people, “a runaway dog.” The Habiru were outlaws by definition since they did not form a part of the established social system and did not consider themselves bound by its laws.

Furthermore, the fact that many of them were fugitive slaves added an additional element of criminality to their image, since in all slave holding societies, flight from slavery is considered a serious crime, often punishable by death. To be sure, the Habiru also had the image of constituting a serious military force, but while this might have endeared them to some, for the established social order it was probably just another count in the indictment. Whether the Habiru themselves felt proud of their outlaw status is hard to say, but the weight of the evidence indicates that proud or not, they were eager to get rid of it.

The best way of finding out how the Habiru felt about being called “Habiru” is by examining how the Hebrews felt about being called “Hebrew.” All the texts which mention the Habiru were written by others and therefore don’t reflect a Habiru point of view, but the Hebrews had ample opportunity to make their views known. And the first thing which every Biblical scholar has noticed about the way the term “Hebrew” is used in Tanach is that it is hardly used at all. In the whole of Tanach, the term “Hebrew” appears only 33 times. In the Torah, the Hebrews are almost always described as the “sons of Israel” (“b’nei Israel” in Hebrew, usually translated as “children of Israel” or “Israelites”). In the later books of Tanach other terms are used, but hardly ever “Hebrew.”

Moreover, when the term “Hebrew” does appear, it is used in certain specific ways. Nadav Na’aman has probed this issue in depth in his illuminating essay, “Habiru and Hebrews: The Transfer of a Social Term to the Literary Sphere,” appearing in Volume 2 of his Collected Essays. Like most Biblical scholars, Na’aman doesn’t think that the Hebrews were Habiru, but he has no doubt that the term “Hebrew” was derived from “Habiru.” He points out, on page 270, that in Tanach, the term “Hebrew” is typically used to describe “Israelites in exceptional circumstancs.” In particular it is used to describe “Israelites migrating to a foreign country” or “Israelites in a position of slavery.” He adds that the use of the term “Hebrew” is especially prevalent “in the stories of the book of Exodus, in which it is applied to Israelites who were enslaved and exploited by the Egyptians for hard labor.” And he concludes, on page 271: “It seems clear that all biblical references to the ˜Hebrews’ reflect some traits borrowed from the image of the second millenium Habiru.”

A good example of the way the term “Hebrew” is used in Tanach may be found in Chapter 29 of the First Book of Samuel. After being forced to flee from the territory of “Israel” because of the wrath of king Saul, the future king David has gathered a band of malcontents around him and found refuge among the Philistines. Now the Philistines are preparing for battle with the forces of king Saul, and David and his band are ready to join them. But the “princes of the Philistines” cry out: “What do these Hebrews here?” Achish, David’s protector among the Philistines, is compelled to send David and his men away, because the other Philistine leaders do not trust him and fear he will join forces with king Saul when the battle is imminent. 

The use of the term “Hebrews” in this context may of course be understood as a reference to the ethnic group of which David and his men were members; but it also makes perfect sense as a synonym for “Habiru”, implying a ragged band of mercenaries viewed with disdain by most of the Philistine leaders. It would seem that the authors of Tanach could not help but make occasional use of the term “Hebrew” as a way of adding a note of realism to their story, while at the same time systematically avoiding any explicit identification of the Hebrews as Habiru because it would have conflicted with the legend of the “sons of Israel.”

***

And this dovetails exactly with what I wrote in this essay: https://johndenugent.com/neanderthals-and-semites/

I found in Wikipedia articles on the apiru in English, German and in French, saying clearly that the people whom the Old Testament later on calls “the Jews” (and earlier on called the “Hebrews”) are likely the descendants of the Habirus — and these Habirus or apirus were in actuality a gang of criminals wandering around in the Middle East, outlaws, a horde which already 4,000 years ago was annoying the leaders of the Sumerian empire, and of the Hittite, Egyptian and Assyrian civilizations.

English ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru ):

Habiru (Ha biru) or gold cApiru pr.w (Egyptian) [1] was the name given by various Sumerian, Egyptian, Akkadian, Hittite, Mitanni, and Ugaritic sources (dated, roughly, from before 2000 BC to around 1200 BC) to a group of people living as nomadic invaders in areas of the Fertile Crescent from Northeastern Mesopotamia and Iran to the borders of Egypt in Canaan [2] Depending on the source and epoch, these Habiru are variously described as nomadic or semi-nomadic, rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, archers, servants, slaves, migrant laborers, etc.

In French ( http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru):

Habiru, Abirou, Hapirou, Habiru is the name given by many sources, Sumerian, Egyptian, Akkadian, Hittite, Mitannite and Ugaritic (dating approximately from -2000 to -1200) to a category of the population of north-west Mesopotamia and the Fertile Crescent from the borders of Egypt, Canaan and Iran. The portrait it draws of Habiru varies by source and the time they are nomadic, semi-sedentary, living outside the law, marginal, rebels, mercenaries, slaves, migrant workers, etc..

[ ¦.] Sumerian documents from the reign of Shulgi, king of Ur v. -2150, describe “a people traveling without clothing, in deathly silence, destroying everything in its path, the men go where they please, planting their tents and their camps, and they live in the countryside without observing the decrees of my king.”

In watching the documentary film of the prestigious Channel 4 in England “Ice Age Columbus” (about the Christopher Columbuses, so to speak, who came to America in Ice Age times, thus the Solutreans]) I saw the actions of various “exiles.”

They roamed about as a curse in the era of the honest, peaceful hunters and gatherers of the Stone Age. They were the criminals, psychopaths, thieves, murderers, and antisocial elements of ice Age times.

Either they were killed/executed/lynched by the clan against which they had transgressed,  or,m in misplaced mercy, they were merely driven away.

Beorg as clan leader confronts a constant troublemaker 

Zia, the daughter of Beorg, chews out this lazy, complaining, quarrelsome clansman.

He later commits murder while hungry and was exiled. Beorg and the clan drive him away, into the forest, giving him only a spear.  If he can hook up with others, he might survive; otherwise he is doomed.

 

In this documentary film “Ice Age Columbus,” Zia, the chieftain’s daughter in one clan of the Solutreans, now having crossed over to North America along the ice shelf then existing, finds that exiled Solutrean criminals, the exiles, have also crossed the Atlantic and have crept up upon them, armed. Exiles banded together, of course, just as decent people did.

Zia and other Solutreans may have had dark hair and fair skin and light eyes as depicted, or some may have been blond. Here she founds her self with exiles in front of and behind her.

 

The warlike Aryans  thousands of years later  were definitely blond-haired, tall, and drank cow’s milk for added protein. They spread all across Europe and the Middle East.  Gradually, their common language, now called “Indo-European,” broke up into different languages.

 

The head of the exile band in the section of North America where Zia and friends have landed threatens Zia”s brother with a razor-sharp spear and confiscates their boat.

In the forests to which they had been expelled, the exiles picked up other antisocial misfits, and became leaders or followers in growing clans of desperados. We must remember that Europe back then was not overpopulated but drastically underpopulated, a nearly empty continent — like North America or Australia in 1800 — with vast forests as in the story of “Little Red Riding Hood,” not wall-to-wall cities, suburbs and towns. It offered plenty of space to highwaymen (and also to goodhearted rebels who were Robin Hood types).

In medieval Germany the forest (as in this depiction of the fairy tale) meant a place women and girls would not walk through alone, whether due to animal wolves or human wolves. In fact, as late as the 1700s there were many still apiru (jewish) criminals, highwaymen, lurking in the forests of southern Germany. The story of Little Red Riding Hood reflects this fear of HUMAN stranger-danger in the forest.

And antisocial females would join them .. or normal women would be abducted so the sociopathic clan had females for sex and cooking.

Amerindians with their pitiful white female captives.

And this union produced babies …..

Then an entire tribe .. then a whole”people” or in reality, an anti-people.

To designate the southern Italian Mafia in the United States, we often use the term “crime family.” This expresses that the various mafias are more than mere “companies” or “organizations.” They are real clans, bands of people, united by feelings of belonging and by ties of marriage, blood and/or friendship as well as by greed and self-interest. They are “fraternal” organizations, exhibiting a sordid cohesion (aside from the occasional assassinations among leaders).

(As Wikipedia reveals, the lower-class Khazars were swarthy Caucasoids who were genetically like the Armenians, Chechens, and Georgians of today, such as the Georgian mega-psychopath Joseph Stalin).

Stalin as a young Bolshevik, bank robber and hitman. Note the semito-caucasian nose, and the eyes.

A later picture of  this same Djugashvilli, who called himself Stalin, in Russian “Steel-Man”

 

We can safely extrapolate from the movie “Ice Age Columbus” that for thousands of years various exiled or escaped individuals since at least the Ice Age have been forming clans of criminals, and I believe, based on my research into the apiru, that exactly this kind of criminal outlaw clan was at the origin of the Jews, and of the Scythians, who later were known as Khazars and became converted to Judaism.

(The word “outlaw,” btw, does not just mean just “criminal.” It means a criminal so heinous that the king or local judge has ruled him “outside the law” forbidding killing, and that meant anyone could strike him down without any punishment whatsoever, in effect “taking out the trash” for a grateful community.)

And such roving thieves, fences and murderers became the apiru, the Khazars and the Gypsies and other wandering peoples who have always terrified decent village people for millennia as soon as they approached any permanent human settlement.

Thus the Hebrews are not a pure race of any kind, but instead

a criminal gene pool,

a psychopathic breed,

that has collected ne’er-do-wells for thousands of years, letting them join the horde.

And this crime family known as Jews numbers in the tens of millions around the world.

Israelis delighted a few years back in the brazen murder of a Palestinian Hamas official. Six Mossad operatives using genuine but stolen passports of several European nations invaded a Palestinian’s hotel room, and strangled him, and it is a cause for national celebration in Israel, a country whose name in Hebrew means, yes, as an angel said after Jacob wrestled with him: “He fights against God.” 

Isra (he fights against)

–el (God)..

As the Romans used to say, Nomen est omen, the name is the omen. The name is OMINOUS!  The fighters against God!

Israeli-British musician Gilad Atzmon commented (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/israeli-pride-ii.html):

The Zionist dream is over. The attempt to become a people like other people has failed.
We are dealing here with a bloodthirsty tribal society on the verge of collective psychosis.

Sorry, Gilad, and sorry, Michael Hoffman.

You are among the brave and sincere people who are trying to change Jewry, or see their problems as merely one of a bad attitude, something that COULD be changed.

But this apiru people has ALWAYS been psychopathic in its very origins.

And the origins of the the apiru are the Neanderthals.

Ad now to this series of blogs by Christopher Jon Bjerknes, who himself is part-Jewish and yet is totally no-nonsense toward this unpeople.

* * *

Old Testament reveals plan for Jews to enslave non-Jews

Below is a series of blogs in 4 parts (I only pasted 1st part, go to urls for 0ther 3 parts below)

http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2008/12/universal-enslavement-of-non-jew.html
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2008/12/universal-enslavement-of-non-jew-jewish.html
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2008/12/universal-enslavement-of-non-jew-part-3.html
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2008/12/universal-enslavement-of-non-jew-part-4.html

Friday, December 05, 2008

The Universal Enslavement of the Non-Jew: The Ancient Jewish Plan for World Domination Found in the Old Testament

 

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com and http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com
The Mossad has set up a network of agents and sayanim in Canada and America who dominate the “alternative media” as talk show hosts, talk show callers, correspondents, message board pests, and controlled opposition anti-Zionists. The mission of these phonies is to turn our attention away from the existential threat the Jewish People pose to humanity, and to buy the Jews enough time to destroy us.

These Jews deny that World Jewry has for 2,500 years planned to take over the World and then use this power to destroy and then exterminate the Goyim. The Jews and crypto-Jews scapegoat Catholics, Muslims, Secret Societies, the Americans, the Russians, the Iranians, Chabad Lubavitchers, Zoharites, Talmudists, Cabalists, etc. ad nauseam, but never state the plain truth that the Jewish People as a whole have always been a parasitic and poisonous plague on humanity and that they are hell-bent on exterminating the human race.

These Jews and crypto-Jews constantly attempt to paint the Jews, themselves, as if victims of what has always been, and what continues to be, the crimes of the totality of the Jewish People against the human race resulting directly from their collective Jewish religion, theircollective Jewish politics, their collective Jewish spirit of segregationism, racism, hatred and supremacism for their entire Jewish history. These Jews and crypto-Jews attempt to divert our attention away from the fact that the Jewish People as a whole, and as an ancient plague, have mass murdered hundreds of millions of non-Jews, destroyed countless civilizations, stolen the wealth of hundreds of nations, and brought war, famine, devastating revolution and genocide to every corner of the Earth, and that the Jews have always pursued these very same goals as the Jews themselves attest in their Old Testament.

These Jews and crypto-Jews constantly attempt to fault the terrible Talmud and cruddy Cabalah for the very same attitudes iterated in the Old Testament, which they hold holy and good, and in so doing attempt to excuse the Jewish People, who in fact collectively worship their genocidal Jewish God through the lens of the Talmud, the Cabalah and the Old Testament. These lying Jews create artificial and false distinctions between Jewish sects,each of which revere the whole of Jewish religious thought including Talmud and Cabalah.

The Zoharites and Talmudists are not the only Jews to view the Kabalah and Talmud as holy books. All major Jewish sects view these books as holy. The “true Torah” Jews not only hold the Talmud and Kabalah to be holy books, they include the Talmud as a part of the Torah, the most important part of the Torah. These Jews who are held up as if good and friendly Jews believe that the Talmud is the most important and revered part of the Torah,despite the lies our Jewish and crypto-Jewish friends tell us about their fellow Jews.

Beyond this childish and ridiculous Cabal of lying Jews, the main stream media ridicule the view that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion could in any way reflect the intentions and actions of the Jewish People, but there is little to be found in that document by way of a plan for World domination, which was not first iterated some 2,500 years ago in the Jewish Old Testament. The lying Jews claim that the accusation that Jews are engaged in a struggle for World domination and World government is an “anti-Semitic canard,” but this plan is plainly stated throughout the ancient Jewish Old Testament.

Let me here begin demonstrating this fact, already known to most Jews despite their public lies, by quoting the words of the Jews’ most revered mythical King, the murderous and treacherous snake of a man, King David, who conspired to murder a man named Uriah, who was loyally battling for David, so that David could then steal Uriah’s widowed wife from his butchered corpse (II Samuel 11).

The perverse Jewish mentality reveals itself in the fact that the Jews’ favorite king was a murderous and treacherous snake. Note that most Jews venerate the snake, King David, just as most Jews suffer from the perverse Jewish mentality which allows them to celebrate genocide every year on the Jews’ favorite holiday, the Jewish festival of Purim, at which festival the Jews engage in pretend cannibalism by eating “Haman’s ears.”

We find that the Jewish book revered by almost all Jews, the Songs of David, Psalms 2, states:

Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?

2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,

3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.

4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.

5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.

6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.

7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.

9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potteräs vessel.

10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.

11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.

12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

For 2,500, the Jewish People, not just the Zoharites and the Talmudists, but the collective whole of the Jewish People have anxiously awaited the arrival of this genocidal Jewish king who will exterminate the Goyim. This plan predates the Zohar by at least 1,700 years and predates the Talmud by at least 700 years.

Continuing the snake-king’s song, Psalm 18:40-50 states,

40 Thou hast also given me the necks of mine enemies; that I might destroy them that hate me.

41 They cried, but there was none to save them: even unto the LORD, but he answered them not.

42 Then did I beat them small as the dust before the wind: I did cast them out as the dirt in the streets.

43 Thou hast delivered me from the strivings of the people; and thou hast made me the head of the heathen: a people whom I have not known shall serve me.

44 As soon as they hear of me, they shall obey me: the strangers shall submit themselves unto me.

45 The strangers shall fade away, and be afraid out of their close places.

46 The LORD liveth; and blessed be my rock; and let the God of my salvation be exalted.

47 It is God that avengeth me, and subdueth the people under me.

48 He delivereth me from mine enemies: yea, thou liftest me up above those that rise up against me: thou hast delivered me from the violent man.

49 Therefore will I give thanks unto thee, O LORD, among the heathen, and sing praises unto thy name.

50 Great deliverance giveth he to his king; and sheweth mercy to his anointed, to David, and to his seed for evermore.

Psalm 72:8-11 states,

8 He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth.

9 They that dwell in the wilderness shall bow before him; and his enemies shall lick the dust.

10 The kings of Tarshish and of the isles shall bring presents: the kings of Sheba and Seba shall offer gifts.

11 Yea, all kings shall fall down before him: all nations shall serve him.

Psalm 110:1-7 states,

The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.

2 The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.

3 Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth.

4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.

5 The Lord at thy right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath.

6 He shall judge among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries.

7 He shall drink of the brook in the way: therefore shall he lift up the head.

Lest any be deceived by the lying Jews who will claim that no Jew today believes in this hateful and genocidal mythology, let them read The Jewish Utopia (https://ia601408.us.archive.org/8/items/TheJewishUtiopia/Higger.-.The.Jewish.Utopia.authentic.Zionist.Mein.Kampf.1932.pdf) by the Jew Michael Higger…

[JdN: I HAVE this shocking book! and everything Bjerknes claims is true!]

..or bear witness to the words of first Prime Minister of the Jewish State of Israel, David Ben-Gurion,

With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.

Israeli Supreme Court with a pyramid and eyeball (upper left) http://vigilantcitizen.com/sinistersites/sinister-sites-israel-supreme-court/

Zoom:

Pyramid on US dollar; Latin phrases mean “our plan has succeeded; a new world order”

On Ukrainian money, left of center

We will not save ourselves from the extermination curse of the mythological Jewish God by romanticizing with lies about the nature and mission of the Jewish People, which has always been to dominate and destroy human life.

We must face this threat head on and put an end to genocidal Jewish aggression against humanity. In a future article, I intend to quote what Ben-Gurion’s prophet Isaiah said, and how he planned for the Jewish people to enslave the Gentiles, steal their wealth, and then exterminate them leaving none alive in the “new earth” which will only know the “elect,” the Jews, that is.

Jewish boys openly smoking cigarettes as tough guys at a Lubavitch wedding

Let all who doubt ponder the tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions, the Jewish Communists mass murdered in the Soviet Union, Communist China and Communist Cambodia.

Pay special attention to the fact that the Jews target the brightest and the best in the initial waves of their genocide so as to leave the Goyim genetically inferior and leaderless. That is the perverse mentality of the Jewish People at work in our modern World.
Christopher Jon Bjerknes

* * *

Sephardic leader Ovadia Yosef: Non-Jews exist to serve Jews

Source:http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/10/18/2741341/rabbi-yosef-non-jews-exist-to-serve-jews

October 18, 2010 18. Oktober 2010

JERUSALEM (JTA [JEWISH TELEGRAPH AGENCY]) ä Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews. 

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat. 

Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi [a Turkish pasha]and eat,” he said to some laughter. 

with prime minister Ehud Barak

Yosef, the spiritual leader of the Shas Party and the former chief Sephardi rabbi of Israel, also said that the lives of non-Jews are protected in order to prevent financial loss to Jews.

“With gentiles, it will be like any person: They need to die, but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant. That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” said the rabbi, who recently turned 90.

An audio recording of some of the rabbi’s remarks was broadcast on Israel’s Channel 10.

* * *

JdN: Denials by various Jewish misleaders that this is the teaching of Judaism are meaningless, because as Ralph Waldo Emerson once said to someone, “Who you are speaks more loudly than what you say.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ESRm5O0Yt0

What ludicrous Jewish supremacism to assert that before the Jews we  gentiles were all moral barbarians, when there is no more barbaric breed on this planet than the neanderthalic apiru, the Hebrew, the Jew.

My mission as the founder of Solutreanism is to break in the most radical and total manner possible with any form of judeolatry, and that means the Old Testament is utterly dead for us.

While there is indeed some beauty and some loftiness of sentiment in certain passages of the Old Testament, there is often charm in the words of a child molester to a child as well, designed to lure him into his house!

……Eternal Solutreanism

https://johndenugent.com/eternal-solutreanism/

John de Nugent

306 S. Steel Street

Ontanagon MI 49953

(906) 884-6689

Facebook: John D. Nugent

Skype: John de Nugent (Ontonagon)

JOHN_DENUGENT@YAHOO.COM

THEJOHNDENUGENT@GMAIL.COM