I talked yesterday with a senior named G, who just got the Moderna shot yesterday. This was down at the local tavern (with outdoor dining still going on at 1o degrees F, thanks to Governor Witchmer)….

G told me he felt “confused” and “just out of it” for 24 hours.

Anyway….

David Martin, PhD (business administration) IS indeed a Member of the Royal College of Physicians, going into the profit motive in medicine and Big Pharma. He said on Jan. 5, 2021:

*** resumé verification

(This guy is for real; the link and screenshot are just for verification: https://player.rcplondon.ac.uk/video/1_pay7g5du)

Dr. Martin received his undergraduate (BA) from Goshen College, his Masters of Science from Ball State University, and his Doctorate (PhD) from the University of Virginia.

Dr. Martin is a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. — https://www.m-cam.com/about-us/

https://www.darden.virginia.edu/batten-institute/people/research-fellows (halfway down on the left)

***

And now the transcript of Dr. Martin’s remarks:

Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public-health exemptions. This is not a vaccine.

This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device — designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.

It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards.[1]

And the vaccine specifically has to both stimulate the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission.

And that is not what this is.

They (Moderna and Pfizer) have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission; it is a treatment. But if it were discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say, “What other [and safer and more tested] treatments are out there?”

The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition, and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea.

That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small packet of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen-manufacturing site.

And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug, because it meets the CDRH definition of a device.

***

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FDA_Center_for_Devices_and_Radiological_Health

***

It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology – it happens to just come in the [very tiny] size of a molecular package.

So, we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine, then we are going to get into a vaccine conversatio. But this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine.

As a result, it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition, just like we will not fall for their industrial-chemical definition of health.

Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say, “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine at all.

It is made to make you sick.

80% of the people exposed to SARSCOV2 are asymptomatic carriers. 80% of people who get this injected into them experience a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, not to induce an immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick.

When the paymaster for the distribution of information happens to be the industry that’s doing the distributing, we lose. Because the only narrative is the one that will be compensated by the people writing the check. That goes for our politicians… and our media – it has been paid for.  If you follow the money, you realize there is no non-conflicted [conflict-of-interest] voice on any network.”