Spread the love

I subscribe for $10 a month to Haaretz (meaning “the Homeland” in Hebrew), an influential Israeli newspaper in English that is very anti-Netanyahu.

Though some of its ideas are libtard and identical to those of “woke” Americans (Jewish or Gentile) — pro-gay, pro-migrant, feminist and multicultural — it also criticizes openly the many reprehensible things going on the the Jewish State, and some of the darker aspects of this people.

Anyway, it recently interviewed a Miki Haimovich, a fairly attractive, racially very white-looking Israeli female politician (with peroxide hair and maybe a secret nose job after high school 😉 ) who is with the quasi-moderate party of Bennie Gantz. She is a vegan, and wants to be the environmental minister if Gantz wins the election today.

This was the article, and it was about how horrifying Netanyahu is for the liberal Israelis and hiow he has made politics much uglier, ruder and far more slanderous: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/elections/.premium-there-s-something-about-israeli-politics-that-repels-many-women-1.8601719

‘There’s Something About Israeli Politics That Repels Many Women’

Not surprisingly, Israelis who support liberalism, compassion, and veganism are often racially very white. As I have often written, Northern European whites are natural liberals with strong feelings of fairness and compassion, and often this is true of white-appearing jews.

(I dated in the mid-1990s a very pretty, very nice Jewish gal with blond hair and blue eyes until I realized she was Jewish, after which I very sadly broke it off. She was extremely nice, had been a Peace Corps volunteer, and was not jewy-acting at all. She also stood to inherit two million dollars, but I just could not compromise my mission. This was at a time when she had a very nice house in Natick, Massachusetts, whereas I was living in poverty in a roominghouse and working at this Cumberland Farms convenience store in Winthrop, Massachusetts. I worked 60 hours a week for minimum age, $5.15 an hour, and alongside a crazy black guy with whom I almost had a fistfight. So breaking it off with this attractive, super-nice and soon to be wealthy Jewish gal who looked very Aryan was a very, very big sacrifice.)

This Miki is on the right, and in the center is the president of Israel, Reuben Rivlin. In fact, all three of these Jews could be Germans by their looks. (Ashkenazi Jews have a lot of Slavic and German blood as well as semitic-neanderthalic; “Ashkenaz” actually means “German”. Many of them have blue eyes.)

It has struck me occasionally how whereas the Big Jews are clearly out to exterminate the white race, and enslave all humans of all races, ruling over 500 million café au lait mongrels with a 90 IQ, if they won, which they will NOT, then the only intelligent quasi-whites that would be left in a browned-down world would be Ashkenazi Jews!

Anyway, here is Miki on the disgust many Israeli women feel for Israeli politics, and recall that Israel is a democratic, parliamentary, and JEWISH state:

“I spoke with many strong women who I hoped would join us [ the moderate, anti-Netanyahu Gantz party], and they said no,” Haimovich relays. “There is something in the world of Israeli politics that repels many women. They hesitate to be in the public eye and the price you have to pay dealing with having dirt thrown at you. It’s really a shame.”

She believes this atmosphere has only intensified in the Netanyahu era, noting that the “divisiveness and hate” has harmed both politics and society at large.

Netanyahu, wife and sons (Note their hair color)

“The way in which Netanyahu has promoted delegitimizing people because they believe something different from you has eaten away at our society,” Haimovich says. “It is sabotaging and destroying us and hurting us, and causing more damage than our external enemies ever can.”

Now, on to another Haaretz article: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/elections/.premium-netanyahu-sordid-campaign-sex-lies-and-sham-videos-gantz-israel-elections-1.8600147

Analysis

Israel Election: Will Netanyahu’s Sordid Campaign of Sex, Lies and Sham Videos Carry the Day?

Excerpts:

“…there is no doubt in anyone’s mind that in this election, more than ever before, Netanyahu has hit rock bottom. He has left no stone unturned, no red line uncrossed, no slime un-hurled, no value un-shredded, no libel unused, and no rival unsullied, including his prime rival and target for abuse, Benny Gantz.”

Then the article exposes a faked video where Gantz, a former general, is depicted by Satanyahu as a pussy and wimp [sic] who does not want to attack Iran [a sign of sanity, given Iran’s 75 million people, its huge, effective, fierce and nationalistic military, and the fact it likely has no nukes].

JdN: The six-foot-tall Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister 1993-96 and 2005-present, says Wiki, “since December 2016 [] has been under investigation for corruption by Israeli police and prosecutors.^[17] On 21 November 2019, he was indicted on charges of breach of trust, bribery and fraud^[18]]

He accurately looks arrogant, evil and/or cynical in every single photo ever taken of him.

White Ashkenazim like him secretly despise the dark-skinned Jews, the Sephardim. (The head of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, once remarked: “The Jews left Palestine brown; they came back white.”)

Now back to the Haaretz article:

The common assumption, which the Prime Minister’s Office failed to categorically deny, is that Netanyahu is the mastermind behind the successful subterfuge. Whether this knowledge deters voters who have already decided to vote for Netanyahu is anyone’s guess, given that their decision was made with the full knowledge that most, if not all, Israeli security chiefs who worked with Netanyahu, in the army, Shin Bet and Mossad, have said far worse about the prime minister’s handling of security affairs than Gantz’s indiscrete adviser, who has no experience in security affairs.

And, lest one forget, said voters had already opted to vote for Netanyahu despite the fact that he has been indicted for corruption and is scheduled to appear before the Jerusalem District Court two weeks after the election as a common criminal defendant.

Related Articles

Netanyahu is trying to dig up dirt on the attorney general who indicted him

This was followed by a harsh Facebook post composed by lawyer Kobi Cassidy who accused Netanyahu’s son Yair of “raping” his daughter Dana in the public arena after circulating unsubstantiated rumors that she was involved in an extramarital affair with Gantz.

Netanyahu junior responded with threats of libel suits against Cassidy and anyone who shared his post, but his reputation precedes him: Yair Netanyahu is considered one of the vilest and most vulgar propagandists for his father, exceeding in ferocity and venality any other Netanyahu fan.

Center-left optimists hope the latest brouhaha involving the Prime Minister’s son will be enough to turn existing public disgust at the first family’s hateful and imperious style into a last-minute change of sentiment. At the very least, the incident shifted the spotlight away from Netanyahu’s ongoing character assassination of Gantz, which, as most recent polls indicated, was hitting its mark at just the right time.

Over the past few weeks, Netanyahu’s smear machine has painted Gantz as corrupt, slow-witted and cowardly. It has resuscitated its April plant about an Iranian hacking of Gantz’s cellphone, spreading well-placed leaks in the media about supposedly embarrassing videos found on the phone that capture Gantz in flagrante delicto, with himself and others.

Son Yair was more direct, claiming on Twitter that Gantz sent sex tapes to his lovers during a Gaza operation.

Netanyahu has personally tarred the former chief of staff as a traitor who would sell his soul in exchange for support from the largely Arab-supported Joint List, and then sell his country down the river.

Up until this weekend, the last before the election, Gantz and his Kahol Lavan party’s response to the tsunami of Netanyahu-inspired defamation was comprised mostly of fumbles, mumbles and grumbles.

….My analysis

There was a very good reason why ancient peoples of every race deliberately opted to have a king system (one-man rule, followed by that man’s first son, and then his, and then his….) instead of a democracy.

King Louis of France, also called Saint Louis (whence the great American city in Missouri on the Mississippi river),

ruled France for over sixty years, throwing the Jews out and burning their Talmuds. France was rich, safe, Jew-free and happy under his reign.

I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.[…]This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection.

It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption,

which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions.

Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

[…]

A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.

[…]

[Then Washington recommends religion and morality to counter this partisan hatred.]

Photo: the First Baptist Church of Providence, Rhode Island, which my ancestor via both parents, Thomas Angell, gave orchard land for in the 1600’s. The current church, very much larger, was built in 1775.

Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ?

And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.

Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

***

….Why my old (2010-11) videos are important

One of the reasons I am working hard to put all my videos back up online, this time using Bitchute (after TruTube and Sonnenrad collapsed due to a truly outrageous lack of donations), is they show the real beliefs of our founding fathers.

Our Founding Fathers (“Framers”) were white nationalists, racialists, nordicists (especially Ben Franklin), anti-black, anti-Indian, and anti-Jewish.

They were also militantly pro-gun,

pro-God,

..and pro-white expansionism, looking down on racially mixed, mestizo countries like Mexico.So of course this gay, half-Jewish mulato opined:

Anyway, what is “democracy”? In Ancient Greek, it means “rule by average folks.” (“Démos” means “average people” and “kratia” – hence the ending “-cracy” in English — means “power.”) A rule by the nation would be an “ethnocracy” or a “laocracy.” What Thomas Jefferson openly wanted was a meritocracy, a literal aristo-cracy, meaning “rule by the best.“The problem with this supposed “average-folks-rule,” democracy, is that average people are, as I wrote in Mein Kampf, pretty disappointing.Basically, they don’t know and they don’t care. 😉

Ten percent of “We, the People” also are treacherous, evil psychopaths.

Ten percent are noble and amazing human beings whom you love to be around. (Many of my readers are like that.)

The late Willis Carto, who supported my work, was in most ways a highly admirable and effective human being.

And the other 80% are human putty, becoming either good or evil according to what their jew-financed “leaders” talk them into.

Scene from the US Army-run Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad

And every election, the 80% who are putty believe the slanders of the 10% who are evil, then begin to view large numbers of their fellow citizens, their brethren, as vile, as cowardly (yes, just as General Gantz is said to be,. a coward, by the Satanyahu fanatics) or idiots, and they vote, in effect, AGAINST the other half of their country.

And thus democracy rests on a rotten foundation, on the 10% who are evil and the 80% who are gullible, apathetic, and like weathervanes, turn and twist in the wind, often voting literally based on good looks.

FDR — four disastrous terms

In other words, democracy is absolutely perfect — for the Big Jews — to manipulate the masses (both Gentile and Jewish) via jew money, jew media and divide-and-conquer.