MY HEALTH CRISIS; Margaret’s last translation — “The Auslandsdeutschen” by Bochaca; Joseph Goebbels’ supreme NS wisdom; white Buddhist monk expects a new WHITE PROPHET

­My late wife Margaret Huffstickler was gardening and translating away until the sudden end. Mercifully, she died (in effect) of a stroke, and quickly — a stroke caused apparently by her head & neck cancer. (She had previously and suddenly also gone deaf in one ear.) 

This translation will appear soon in The Barnes Review magazine, for which we wrote 64 articles.

….Health crisis

THE AUSLANDSDEUTSCHEN
by Joaquin Bochaca (a Spanish-Catalan national socialist historian)

Translated from the Spanish by Margaret Huffstickler

from Bochaca’s book Los Crimenes de los Buenos, “the crimes of the ‘good guys’ “

[JdN: Ausland in the German language means, literally “Outland,”and signifies foreign countries, that is, not in Germany proper. Ethnic Germans living in Hungary, France, or Poland would be auslandsdeutsch.

I have been to Barcelona and other places to speak at meetings of the great WN Pedro Varela, in 2006, and so has Margi, in 2012, who has also translated many chapter of the brilliant revisionist history books of Catalan origin, Joaquin Bochaca, into English for The Barnes Review.

Either we stop the jews,l or we will be killed, or enslaved, worked to the bone, and eaten. Expect no mercy from the wicked and sadistic jews!

As Goebbels said on page 168 of his magnificent final book, The Law of War:

Wir [Nationalsozialisten] sind ständig bemüht, die Dinge so zu sehen, wie sie tatsächlich sind,  und nicht, wie wir sie uns einbilden möchten. Wir gleiten nicht mehr wie unsere Väter mit billigen Phrasen über unsere Probleme hinweg, sondern gehen ihnen nach bis auf den tiefsten Grund.

Transl. EN:

We [National Socialists] are constantly trying to see things as they really are, not how we want them to be. We no longer gloss over our problems with cheap hopium phrases like our fathers before us, but we confront them and get to the bottom of things.

You can tell that Goebbels did not want to get into religion or contradict certain tenets of Christianity, which then was still pretty powerful in Germany, unlike today, when it is correctly viewed as 1) unscientific, 2) pedophilic and 3) refugees-welcome libtard. (Most WNs in Germany hate Christianity as a wimpy religion for gullible, hopeless libtard females who love apologizing to the Jews.)

But he also wanted to say something about life after death. Some readers might thing he was just speaking in metaphors and consoling myths in the passage below, but he was not.

(Page 166) Diejenige, die für das große Ziel des Vaterlandes ihr Leben hingaben, sind aus diesen Fesseln [des irdischen Daseins, zumal im relativ kleinen Deutschland] befreit. Sie haben die irdische Hülle gesprengt und stehen jenseits der engen Begrenztheiten, in denen wir atmen und wirken.

(Page 170) Wir können uns heute gar nicht vorstellen, welche Gewalt die Toten über die Lebenden besitzen, wenn wir sie nur zu Wort kommen lassen. Das Heer der Gefallenen hat die Waffen nicht niedergelegt. Es marschiert in Wirklichkeit in den Reihe der kämpfenden Soldaten mit.

Transl:

Those who gave their lives for the great goal of the fatherland are freed from these shackles [of earthly existence, especially in a relatively small Germany with limited size and manpower]. They have thrown off this earthly shell, and live beyond the narrow confines in which we must breathe and act.

(Page 170) Today we cannot imagine the power the dead have over the living, if we only let them speak to us. The army of the fallen did not lay down their arms. It is actually marching now in the ranks of our fighting soldiers.

The white American, politically very conservative Buddhist monk Pannobhasa (born John David Reynolds in Alaska) said the time has now come for a new Aryan prophet.

Western Buddhism is [now] castrated, weak, corrupted by progressivism and rejects the original thoroughly masculine, head-oriented ascetic system commanded by the elite aristocrat Siddhartha Gautama. Alt-Buddhism offers an alternative to standard western Buddhism, intended for elites to make strong people stronger. This is a place for promoting fearlessness, self-discipline, and austerity with the acknowledgment that all suffering is self-inflicted and there is no such thing as being a victim.(https://www.reddit.com/r/AltBuddhism/comments/bjp72w/venerable_pannobhasa_talks_about_cultural_marxism/)

I do consider it unfortunate that the European race has not had its own prophet, in the sense of a true spiritual leader and founder of an advanced religious system—not since very ancient times anyhow. Instead of Julian’s Neoplatonism [Julian was a pagan Roman emperor who tried to reverse Christianity’s takeover of Rome] we adopted the distorted message of a Hebrew from Galilee.

I do think the time is getting very ripe for a spiritual revival in the west, and the need for an inspired spiritual leader may bring one forth, just as the desperate desire for a Messiah among the Jews of the early Roman Empire, or the deep desire for a prophet of their own among the early medieval Arabs, helped Jesus and Muhammad to rise to the level of spiritual world leaders.

A great European prophet does seem overdue.

— (1/5th down here: https://politicallyincorrectdharma.blogspot.com/2019/04/my-letter-to-thule-society_15.html)

.

Degrelle: Hitler was no atheist!

.

.

*** And now here is Margi’s final translation…

The Germans who lived outside of Germany, the Auslandsdeutsche, suffered various forms of persecution [in 1945], from the mass killings in Czechoslovakia to dispossession pure and simple in Bolivia. Even though we dealt in another chapter with the deportations suffered by sixteen million Germans, we will now deal with the thefts, atrocities and outright exterminations that took place from the final days of the war until several months later.

We will start with the case of the Germans from Czechoslovakia and the territory of the Sudetenland. May 1945. The war is over, and Czechoslovakia has already been “liberated.” The country of the Sudetenland, where, for centuries, Germans have made up the vast majority, is under martial law. In 1945, three and a half million Germans reside there. The civil administration is taken over by Czech national committees. President Benes has proclaimed in a decree:”

“The Germans and Hungarians can’t be trusted. You must seize the country’s administration from them, and their personal property.” The farms and agricultural machinery of the Germans were confiscated.

These measures were supplemented by others of a political nature: “distinctive insignia for the Germans, limitation of the hours in which they could leave their homes, a ban on attending church, walking on sidewalks and receiving medical care in hospitals. Benes himself had declared in a speech:

“All you need to leave the Germans is a handkerchief to soak up their tears.”

Radio Prague began broadcasting the slogan:

“Death to all Germans!”.

In each city a concentration camp was created, but in large cities many were created. Corporal punishment was officially introduced. Disrespect to a policeman or a Czech partisan cost, if it was “minor offense,” ten lashes. If it was considered serious, the firing squad.

Here’s what Manfred Lutgenhort, an eyewitness of the events he described, said:

This is the case of Helena Burger: ‘Look, I’m bringing you these German sows,’ said Professor Zelenka, delivering to the mob twenty women, some of whom were sixty and seventy years old. They were savagely beaten. Then Helena Burger heard an order: ‘On your knees, German whores.’ The women knelt and their hair was cut off with bayonets. Helena Burger fainted, but was revived with a bucket of cold water.

Then, with a kick, they broke two ribs. Finally they cut a piece of flesh from her foot two inches deep. When she returned home at night, her children did not recognize her. Several of her companions in misfortune had died as a consequence of the beatings. Two had committed suicide. Another had gone mad. Three weeks later, Helena Burger was transferred to Hagibor concentration camp, which contained 1,200 prisoners distributed among four hangars. During the night, a female member of the Czech Red Cross noted the young and beautiful women, and at night led the [Soviet] Russian soldiers to their hangars. Some women were raped up to forty-five times in the course of one night [Footnote: Documents on the Expulsion of the Germans from Eastern-Central Europe ].

Now the testimony of Engineer Franz Resch:

In Bokowitz I saw thousands of Germans, men and women, civilians and soldiers, and even ten year old children, brutally killed. The mobs beat up those defenseless beings. Their dislocated bodies were covered with hydrochloric acid, to increase the suffering. Some were still alive when they cut off their fingers to steal their rings. I also saw, in the field at Kladnow, how they poured boiling tar on bare backs of some prisoners, after which they were beaten with sticks. I lost my right kidney as a result of beatings I received. On May 10, the day after the official end of the war — even though Czechoslovakia had already been liberated for over a month — a freight train arrived at the field in Kladnow, full of wounded German soldiers. They were gathered in an open field and hand grenades were thrown at them. Most of them died.

[Footnote: White Book of the Sudeten Germans. Document # 5].

The same scenes of horror were reproduced everywhere. In Iglau, the German mayor, was tried and, without being allowed to speak, was condemned to be scalped in open court. His screams were so terrible that the poor man broke his vocal cords.

350 Iglau residents were forced to march completely naked, by night, at a fast pace; any who stopped or fell were finished off with rifle butts. After a 20-mile death march, there were no survivors. In view of what was happening, 1,200 Germans of Iglau preferred to take their own lives [Ibid. Id. Op. Cit. Document # 11 ]. In Freudenthal concentration camp the detainees were beaten until the guards were too tired to continue. Some prisoners were buried alive [Footnote: Documents on the Expulsion of the Germans from Eastern-Central Europe. ]. In the field of Morasko Ostrava, a peasant woman, eight months pregnant, was kicked in the stomach until she miscarried. As she lay dying her breasts were cut off [Footnote: White Book of the Sudeten Germans. Document # 14].

All the inhabitants of the city of Saaz (about 3,000 Germans) were machine-gunned by a unit of the Czech Army on May 15, six days after the end of the war [Footnote: Ibid. Id. Op. Cit. Document # 1].

But the culmination took place in Prague, where more than half a million Germans lived. On May 13, 1945 Edouard Benes, the Grand Master of Czech Freemasonry, entered Prague, returning from London [Footnote: where he had comfortably sat out the war — MH]. Benes was the bel esprit, the spoiled child of well-meaning European liberal progressivism. With Benes came Tomas Masaryk, the other Buddha of orthodox liberalism.

The reception prepared for them by their followers, at whose head was a Communist Jew named Slansky, was spectacular. Many Germans were hung by their feet from the big billboards of Wenceslas Square, and doused with gasoline. Then, when the two great “humanitarians” arrived, the victims were burned to form living torches [Footnote: White Book of the Sudeten Germans. Document # 15.].

In a book of over a thousand pages, the White Book of the Sudeten Germans, horrors are described that were unprecedented in the history of mankind. Czech and Jewish women, armed with batons, beating the bellies of pregnant German women until they miscarried. In one single concentration camp 10 women died every day as a consequence of these tortures [Footnote: Ibid. Id. Op. Cit. Document # 16.]. In another camp, detainees were forced to lick the smashed brains of their companions who had been beaten to death. Other detainees were forced to eat the infectious excrement of their fellow-prisoners who had died of dysentery [Footnote: ibid. Id. Op. Cit. Document # 17.].

Czech and Jewish doctors refused medical help to German women who had been raped by Russian soldiers. Hundreds of thousands were killed or committed suicide. Such was the case, for example, in the city of Brno [Brunn], where in one day 275 [ethnic-German] women committed suicide [Footnote: ibid. Id. Op. Cit. Document # 17.]. In the Municipal Stadium in Prague, May 18, nine days after the war ended, five thousand prisoners, members of the SS, were machine gunned [Footnote: Louis Maischalsko: World Conquerors p. 120.].

The total number of deaths in the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia came to at least 250,000, plus those who perished in the subsequent deportations and those who endured a slow, agonizing death in the forced labor camps [Footnote: White Book of the Sudeten Germans. Document # 22.]. It is difficult to assess the number of deaths in the forced deportation and further deaths in forced labor camps. No witness can be trusted in this regard, since the figures that have advanced are third- or fourth-hand, and perhaps exaggerated.

In any event, to the 250,000 massacred, according to the White Book of the Sudeten Germans, in the months following the end of the war, we must add, at a minimum, another 175,000 who died of mistreatment or starvation in the work camps, according to official West-German sources [Footnote: Committee on the Sudeten Refugees. Part II, p. 86].

The extermination of the Germans in Yugoslavia was carried out, at first, through a number of massacres without order or method, and later thanks to the legal support of an unjust law enacted by the so-called “Anti-Fascist Committee for the Liberation of Yugoslavia” on November 21, 1944.

This “committee” was set up by Marshal Tito himself, acting as the secretary of Moses Pijade and Jakob Rankowitz. These laws, inter alia, prescribed that:

.
a) All persons of German origin who lived in Yugoslavia automatically lost Yugoslav nationality, even if they or their parents had been born on Yugoslav territory. They also lost all their civil and political rights.
b) All property, movable or immovable [i.e. real estate], of such persons was automatically confiscated by the state, which assumed full ownership.
c) Persons of German ethnic origin could not claim any civil or political rights; they had no right to go to court or to use existing laws to protect their lives, their persons or property [Footnote: Maurice Bardèche, Crimes de guerre des Alliés. p. 26-27 ].

In short, the Germans were considered res nullius. Since they were not able to claim the protection of any law, anyone could do with them, literally, what he pleased, from robbing them to slaughtering them. They had, in fact, fewer rights than a stray dog. This infamous legislation, unprecedented in the history of mankind, was known to the Western Allies, those authors of fine phrases about freedom and democracy.

Winston Churchill had sent his son Randolph as a personal ambassador, traveling with “Marshal” Tito. There’s more: the amazing law that equated the Germans in Yugoslavia to less than beasts and put them on the level of res nullius, ie “abandoned property” was read by the stations of the BBC in London.

The author, then a boy, remembers hearing it with genuine amazement, and that it deeply disturbed him to hear the reading of those decrees just after a vibrant speech by a British bigshot who claimed that the war was being fought so that the doctrine “all men are equal” would become reality.

As a result of these laws and their subsequent implementation, 250,000 Germans were no longer regarded as human. Nearly all were farmers, particularly numerous in the region of Marienbad (Maribor).

Their land, farm implements, furniture, even their clothes were immediately seized. Anything that remained to them, then, they held precariously. Every German represented a work-value, which could be sold, transferred or exchanged for something.

They could be rented out, or even destroyed by the state. In many cases, the Germans were rented to individuals, but sometimes they were also rented or transferred to other states, especially Russia. Moreover, the Germans had no right to live with their families; they had no rights over their children who, in thousands of cases, were taken away without explanation; they had no right to do or not do anything, or to stay in a particular place or leave without permission from their “owners.” Literally, they had become objects of the state and government.

Such a situation had never existed in Europe; never had there existed in Europe men without the right to own anything, since even what they themselves created was not their property, they could not acquire, bequeath or give anything, they could not receive anything; were not entitled to receive food or clothing, and if they received the bare minimum to ensure their survival as slaves, it was as a favor and could be removed at the whim of the state.

The most serious innovation established by this law was the ban on requesting protection from the courts or state institutions. This meant that Germans had no right to present a complaint, much less to sue anyone; it also meant that they had no right to carry any identification papers, including their certificate of baptism. They could be inspected at any time by any Yugoslav citizen, and if a paper was found they could be punished. In fact, they could incur any punishment for no reason whatever, because the fact that the Germans were prohibited from presenting complaints or suing meant that they could be subjected to any maltreatment without any Yugoslavian being called to account for it.

All Yugoslavians had jurisdiction over them, and could become, at the same time, judge and executioner. This situation was exacerbated by the official propaganda, which made Yugoslavs believe that by inflicting ill-treatment on the Germans, they were carrying out an act of patriotism.

The laws of November 21 were confirmed by another law of April 29, 1945, which, moreover, stipulated that such laws applied not only to Germans, or descendants of Germans, living in Yugoslavia, but also to Germans who were in Yugoslavia for any reason — that is, essentially, to German soldiers, who were also assimilated to the status of res nullius. These laws, it goes without saying, had as their object the mass extermination of the Germans in Yugoslavia, which was obtained by three methods:

— mass liquidation,

— mass deportation, and

–extermination by famine and forced labor in concentration camps.

The wholesale liquidations took place, almost entirely, during the anarchic period that preceded the laws of November 21, 1944, and their perpetrators were the partisans, who succeeded in exterminating entire villages. Following the laws of 21 November, the mass liquidations ceased and were replaced by individual liquidations permitted by law, that “Expressed a tendency to sadism to which the new legislation allowed free rein” [Footnote: Maurice Bardèche, Crimes de guerre des Alliés. p. 29 ].

By 1948 the individual liquidations had ended; one of the last victims was the well-known Father Adalbert Schmidt, a Benedictine, who had spent the last 12 years of his life opposing National Socialism on grounds that he described as theological. Father Adalbert, who blindly believed in the equality of men, died from being beaten by his Yugoslavian “equals,” who had flogged him for several hours.

But the fact is that by 1948 there were very few Germans alive in Yugoslavia: only 42,000 were eventually sent to Russia as “labor”, i.e. as slaves. They were sent on foot, and in winter, which means that many must have died on the way. In any case, nothing has been heard from them.

In total, out of the German colony that was living in Yugoslavia when the war started, consisting of some 250,000, only some 10,000 managed to survive, fleeing to Austria and surrendering to American and British troops.

* * *

.
In the last days of the war, by May 1945, some 80,000 German soldiers had surrendered to the British in Austria, and were interned in a concentration camp in Carinthia [in German, Kärnten]. At almost the same time the remains of the Croatian Army (some 290,000 officers and soldiers who had surrendered to the English and Americans) arrived at the camp. On May 17, these 370,000 soldiers were handed over to Tito.

Please note that these soldiers, prisoners of war and members of regular armies, were covered by the Conventions of Geneva and the Hague and, therefore were entitled to correct treatment. Nevertheless, during the first three months following the end of the war they were liquidated without charges and without any trial, whether through systematic massacres around Bleiburg [Footnote: Eduardo Augusto García: THE BLEIBURG TRAGEDY. (sub-titled: DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE MASS-KILLING OF CROATS IN COMMUNIST YUGOSLAVIA DURING 1945. SUPPLEMENTS: THE TRAGEDY OF THE SLOVENES MASSACRE AND EXPULSION OF THE GERMAN MINORITY IN JUGOSLAVIA) Available online at http://www.studiacroatica.org/libros/tragedia/tb080401.htm ] or during the “death march” from Maribor to Ursac.

Indeed, it can be observed that in the course of World War II the Communists were carrying out a particular technique of extermination, which consisted of forcing to march, by road or cross country, large masses of people whom they wanted to exterminate. This is verified as having been implemented not only by the Russian Communists but also, and especially, by the Yugoslav Communists and, specifically, Serbs.

The horrific slaughter of Croatian and German prisoners in Bleiburg is commonly known as “The Tragedy of Bleiburg.” The bodies of these 370,000 soldiers who had been handed over to Tito by the Anglo-Americans have been found in the following mass graves:

.
In Maribor (Marienbad), 40,000 dead;
in Kcevje, about 30,000 corpses;
in Bleiburg 40,000 female bodies atrociously mutilated;
in Kranj, 2,500 bodies;
Saint-Vid (Teskocelo) 25,000 corpses;
in Potudik, 2,000 bodies;
in Luknja Huda, some 16,000 corpses;
in Bezigrad, 2,000 corpses
in Hrastkik, 7,000 dead;
in Lasko, 3,000 dead;
in Kostenjevica, 7,000 dead;
in Crna, 3,000 dead;
in Kamnik, 1,000 bodies;
Zagreb, eleven great pits containing approximately 80,000 bodies;
in Cracano, 2,000 bodies;
in Sosic, 3,000 dead;
in Vrgin Most, 7,000 corpses
in Dubocac, 2,000 dead;
in Patravski-Kloster, 2,000 bodies;
in Virovitica, 2,000 bodies;
in Butmir-Kasindon, 2,000 bodies;
in Kravarski, 5,000 dead;
in Bjelovar, 8,000 dead;
in Nasice, 4,000 dead;
in Backi Jara, 5,000 bodies;
in Vrach, 2,500 corpses. [Footnote: Maurice Bardèche, Op. Cit. p35.- The testimony of Bardèche is based on the criminal complaint of Klagenfurt’s lawyer, Peter Schottler, which was corroborated by the “Investigative Comittee on the Bleiburg Tragedy,” of Cleveland, Ohio (Author’s note)].

Here we have a super-Katyn which, for its cruelty and its appalling size, is absolutely unique.

These mass graves are continuous from the Austro-Yugoslav border to the Yugoslav-Romanian border. It is noteworthy that the Yugoslav Government has never denied the truth of the facts. When the “Committee to Investigate the Bleiburg Tragedy,” chaired by the American academics John Prcela and Joseph Hesimovic, reported the case to the United Nations, the Yugoslav delegate said cynically that the dead had to be buried, and that’s why were so many graves with corpses in Yugoslav territory [Footnote: National Zeitung, Munich, 10-IV-1965].

It only remains for us to add, before closing this exposé of the crimes of the “good guys” in Yugoslavia, that the main perpetrators accused by the Committee to Investigate the Bleiburg Tragedy were Koca Popovic and Dusan Kvedr — apart from, of course, Marshal Tito. Well, Popovic became Minister of Foreign Affairs in Yugoslavia and Kvedr became Yugoslavia’s ambassador in Bonn. There’s no doubt: when the “good guys” are in charge, crime pays good dividends. One more example: the partisan “general” Većeslav Holjevac, a specialist in the extermination of Italian soldiers and civilians in the area of Trieste, was appointed mayor of Zagreb.

The Banat region extends across the Transylvanian Alps, the Danube, and the Tisza and Mures rivers. At the time of Turkish rule, the Banat, from having been a fertile and prosperous region, had become a desolate place; for that reason it was necessary to appeal to German settlers, who contributed to its recovery. At the end of World War I the Banat, in spite of constituting a geographic and economic unit, was divided among Yugoslavia, Hungary and Romania [Footnote: Gran Enciclopedia Catalana, T. III, p. 123 ].

We do not wish to go on and on describing demented acts of cruelty, even though there is documentation on thousands of cases, each more vomit-inducing than the last.

We will mention only that the “fashion” in the Hungarian Banat was to tie German farmers spread-eagled on tables, by the feet and hands, and open their bodies with knives, as is done with pigs in France and Spain, leaving them bleeding to death. In Cernje, in the Hungarian Banat, all the Germans of the city, some 5,000, were beaten to start with. Neither elderly nor children were spared.

Then, armed gypsies went from house to house and made known to the German women who had not yet been beaten to death, that they were going to rape and then behead them. The rape and death of the German women of Cernje began on October 24, 1944. Many escaped that fate by committing suicide. Entire families committed suicide together. The sexton Johann Joldscheck was killed by bleeding him to death, as already described; before that he was made to watch the rape of his wife and two daughters by several Roma, and the beheading of his son [Footnote: Maurice Bardèche: Crimes de guerre des Alliés, pág. 44.].

Let us not continue: the entire population of the German Banat, some 200,000 people, disappeared without trace, since after the first orgy of killings and torture the survivors were sent to the East, probably to Russia, on foot [Footnote: Ibid. Id. Op. Cit, p. 46. ]

In Poland, the German minority fled, for the most part, before the arrival of the Red Army. It is estimated that only about thirty-five thousand German civilians remained in their homes in Poland. Virtually all of these were interned in the concentration camp in Lamsdorf, where the treatment they received was similar to that described when we dealt with the Czech and Yugoslavian concentration camps. A peculiarity of the Polish atrocities — or, in any case, of the lawless mob in Poland, consisted of their brutality to women and children.

According to Dr. Esser, a survivor who managed to escape to West Germany, eight thousand six hundred children who were in Lamsdorf died of starvation and abuse, although most children were taken in trucks to the East and never heard of again. Priests were forbidden to exercise their ministry. The Lamsdorf Catholic priest on several occasions refused the last rites to dying prisoners, such was the “racist” hatred of this man, systematically incited by official propaganda [Footnote: Documentation sur L’expulsión des Allemands en Pologne. testimony of Dr. Easer, military surgeon (Commission de juristes independents français) Paris, 1951 ].

There are no official figures on the casualties on the German civilian population living in Poland. It is known that about 350 or 400 managed to escape to the West. The fate of others is not known officially, although an independent committee of French jurists concluded that they were probably executed or left to die of starvation, unless they were handed over to the Russians, who worked their captives until they perished of physical exhaustion.

* * *
Everywhere, in varying degrees, the Auslandsdeutschen were mistreated. There were countries, such as Bolivia, which decreed the expropriation of property belonging to Germans, even Bolivian citizens of German origin. There were others, such as neutral Switzerland, which handed over to the Western Allies even their own citizens who had National Socialist ideas and, with more “reason,” German citizens residing in the Swiss Confederation, when the British, French or American demanded them.

And, as all this happened, there was a deafening silence by the spiritual shepherds of Christianity. Some spoke out. Very few. Most, fearful, kept silent, while the rooster crowed three million times in the halls of the cardinals’ palaces, and Christ was crucified again, millions of times, in the persons of countless unfortunates tortured, defiled, mutilated and murdered.

—

res nullius – Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Revised 6th Ed (1856) :

RES NULLIUS. A thing which has no owner. A thing which has been abandoned by its owner is as much res nullius as if it had never belonged to any one.
2. The first possessor of such a thing becomes the owner.

.

.

.