1 a archaic : deprive b : to reduce in scope : diminish <attempts to abridge the right of free speech>
2 : to shorten in duration or extent <modern transportation that abridges distance>
3 : to shorten by omission of words without sacrifice of sense : condense

— abridg·er noun

It is thus clear that while the feds can pass and enforce hate-CRIMES legislation (against physical violent crime based on racial hatred) they cannot and must not dare to cross the sacred red line (as in Europe or Canada) and ABRIDGE  our freedom — of SPEECH.

Or the feds will trigger the full and final scenario of our race death facing us. Any abridgement of freedom of SPEECH means that THEY have by their own volition ENDED the Constitution. The FIRST Amendment is WHY we have a United States! For freedom of speech!

And thus the beginning of hate-speech laws is the END of the United States as we know it. What comes after that is naked, ugly, vicious, federal brute force, of centralized state power and terror, and the final enshacklement of the white American slave population, prior to the gradual and total extermination of the white population by DIE-OUT, except for a few blonde female sex slaves to be used by  Hollywood and Wall Street jews, and of white boys used for ritual murder (www.bloodpassover.com). (Hey, jews reading this, the author Ariel Toaff is an Israeli tenured professor. Son of the late GRAND RABBI OF ROME, and not exactly a neo-nazi :-))

===========SOLARGENERAL.COM!

http://solargeneral.com

Solar General is a powerful WN-owned server of great and growing importance in our infiltrated movement. I salute their hard work.

===========

A comrade sent me this exchange between two WNs, and how true it all is:

* * *

* * *

This is what I wrote about in my seminal article on Psychopaths in Power (https://johndenugent.com/jdn/articles,

then scroll down 4/10ths on the right to the .pdf

… and I am proud that my January 2007 article has contributed to the whole WN movement seeing this issue as it is:

PSYCHOPATHS GRAVITATE TOWARD TOTAL POWER IN ALL RACES — AND ALL ORGANIZATIONS, including the WN movement.

One physical marker is the dead look in the eyes of a psychopath.

==========

Another comrade sent this regarding the proposed new Finnish law saying that even VISITING a WN website could cost you four years in prison [!!] (see my blogpost here: https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/01/20/four-years-prison-for-visiting-pro-white-websites:

* * *

And the irony here is that Americans are constantly being told that they are fighting for “freedom and democracy”. As if any form of representative government could long exist without freedom of speech, most especially freedom of speech with regard to who can immigrate into a nation.

After all, how free are a people if they cannot even voice an objection to invaders (and talk about what exactly constitutes an invader — foreign culture, religion and genetics) who threaten to take their county from them? That’s probably the most important right a person can have.

Yet, the silence of the U.S. government with respect to defending the freedom of speech of Europeans is deafening.

* * *

A comrade is pushing me to run for Congress this year.

I wrote:

* * *

I will run, but not because anyone double-dares me or tries inverse psychology. Look what happened when [comrade X] got sucked into something. Look how he went to prison and then his name was slandered, to this day!

And I have hard experience in 1990 of total vote fraud. They closed down the whole frigging vote count on me!

Wikipedia (a “Hullabaloo Horowitz” at Wikipedia DELETED the entire article on JdN — because I was “insignificant” despite 2.4 million hits on my name on Bing — http://www.bing.com/search?q=%22John+de+Nugent%22&filt=all — and the Discovery Channnel interviewing me for FOUR HOURS with a six-man crew and their hotshot host, Oliver Steeds https://johndenugent.com/jdn/2010/01/09/discovery-channel-4-hr-grilling-kudos-aryan-duct-tape), so I put it up on my own website 😉 https://johndenugent.com/jdn/wikipedia_biography_john_de_nugent):

[edit] 1990 Tennessee Republican primary for US Congress

In July-August 1990, de Nugent, using the campaign name “Jack Nugent” (respecting a Southern political usage of nicknames, such as “Bill” Clinton or “Jimmy” Carter) ran in the Republican primary for Congress in the Sixth District of Tennessee, south and east of Nashville, on a platform that he consistently designated as “pro-white.”[49], [50] He was officially awarded 26.7 percent of the vote in the primary election held on August 2, 1990 (the same day as the Invasion of Kuwait by Saddam Hussein), albeit de Nugent suspects that massive electronic vote fraud[51] denied him an outright victory on primary day, August 2, 1990. WSMV-TV (Channel 4) coverage shows anchor Jeff McAtee (photo)[52] saying during the news show “Scene at Six”[p.m.] that “voter turnout is light in the Sixth Congressional District…. Reporter Steve Linn says the light voter turnout is expected to hurt Nugent.” Yet that same evening, on the same station, WSMV, during “The Scene at Ten” the same anchor, Jeff McAtee (jumbling his words several times, and referring to the race as “the Sixth State Senate race”) says “Here is what the results show so far” — and then the wrong race results are shown. (In fact, they are for Sheriff of Davidson County, which contains Nashville, with 161 of 164 precincts reporting, i.e. 98%).

A political analyst, Lee Smith (1996 photo),[53], [54] then comes on to say “[Nugent] was running a fairly credible race in the earlier election results that I saw” and the news anchor, McAtee, agreed that it was credible “for very much a newcomer!” (Nugent was not only a newcomer to the state but was a New England “Yankee” running in a Southern state as well.) The analyst, sweating visibly in the air-conditioned television studio, then editorialized: “It would be an acute embarrassment in this day and time if he won.” By then the voting machines already had stopped counting Jack Nugent’s race at 6% of the vote tallied. photo purchased from a Nashville TV video service from the station in 1990 by John de Nugent; Lee Smith, Tennessee political analyst, WSMV-TV, August 2, 1990, “Scene at Ten” news (10 pm). (Click on small box icon — upper right — to see the enlarged photo.) Finally, reporter Steve Linn of WSMV (photo)[55] says the exact opposite of what his station had reported at 6 pm: “Heavy voting and minor problems have delayed the vote tally” and..[..]..there is no clear winner.” The voting machine tally had been stopped by then since 8 p.m., for two hours, but not for the other election races in Tennessee. The WTVF-TV “Ten O’Clock Report” reporter lists “Gregory Cochran [later deemed the winner] at 37%, Wallace Embry at 33% and Jack Nugent at 30%; that’s pretty close…” and the screen says “Precincts Reporting: 6%.” (See photo of TV screen and primary results.)[56]

=============================

I vowed THEN that NEVER would I run for office again until:

1) the white masses were hungry and jobless

2) I was ready personally to be a leader

3) I had a new vision to present (the Eternal Solutreans and White Safety & Heritage Zones)

4)  I have an organization FIRST, so I have POLL WATCHERS to keep elections honest.

If I run without this fourth part, Roy, then this is what will happen:

1) total federal heat (the IRS is already after me, and the FBI is harassing even my small-fry supporters) to indict, attempt to arrest or kill me by “accident,” “heart attack,” “suicide” or an overt assassination a la Rockwell, prob. using a deranged WN.

2) and read this carefully — the jew goal in MY case is this: to get the masses ELATED that they now have a leader, and then CRUSH me and thus THEIR hopes. The human nervous system can stand just so many disappointments and then the hope dies. The hope itself becomes irritating and a source of torment. The soul gives up, it shrivels, and goes NUMB.

Any election where I run will see me start fast, get lots of initial support and then the jews will initiate their massive media mega-24/7 counter-strike: TOTAL LAUGHING-STOCK CHARACTER DEFAMATION followed by MASSIVE ELECTRONIC VOTE FRAUD.

THIS is what the jews want — to get everyone elated over me and then humiliate, smash and destroy me, with a media blitz without parallel since the days of Rockwell (who was a household word in the 1960s — BUT ONLY as a traitor and nut, which I well remember).

My plan is this: to finish my book, start my movement, and then hold with great seriousness an election for “President of the Americans.” (No treasonous talk about overthrowing Obongo. He can stay “President of the United States,” weak and discrediting to his NWO cause. I pray he lives long and presides for three more years over the final end of the Establishment’s “cred.”)

I shall be the president, by vote organized privately, of the original race-conscious white Americans, who predate the USA going back to 1620 and indeed go back to the Solutreans in 20,000 BC. (YouTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=fr&v=PMHo4mf2CAM)

This is based on a concept I am stealing from the greatest stealers of all, the jews. The Jewish Agency was a non-governmental organization for the jews in Palestine before they took over the whole country. It became more and more powerful and took on the trappings of the legal and power representative of the jewish community in Palestine in its dealings with the Arab Palestinians and with the British Empire, which ran Palestine after WWI. Eventually, it morphed into the State of Israel.

As I said to Alan Colmes, I am an Aryan zionist. 😉 And what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

* * *

Jewish Agency for Israel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Agency_for_Israel]

The logo of the Jewish Agency

The Jewish Agency for Israel (Hebrew: הסוכנות היהודית לארץ ישראל, HaSochnut HaYehudit L’Eretz Yisra’el), also known as the Sochnut or JAFI, served as the pre-state Jewish government before the establishment of Israel and later became the organization in charge of immigration and absorption of Jews from the Diaspora.

* * *

I may thus, as the democratically elected President of the Americans, a NGO position, ALSO run for Congress in what is now the Jewnited Snakes. 😉 Whether I win or lose, I remain the head of “THE WHITES WHO ARE NOT DOOMED.”

My goal: Never Again a white holocaust, as happened to the Solutreans at the hands of Asiatics [10,000-7,000 BC] and to the 40,000,000 Slavic Aryans of Russia and Ukraine at the hand of Soviet jews and their blood relatives, the Georgians [AD 1917-1957].

I must not throw my life away. I see no one else on the horizon who has even the faintest whiff of a gift or vision or plan for turning this situation around.

Certainly not this guy, the WN and attorney William Johnson, head of the American3p.org, as well-meaning, courageous and intelligent as he may indeed be, as seen in this nice, logical, untestosteronizing video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtAAw4cBevk

He might as well be asking the white working class through his Rolls Royce for the Grey Poupon! 🙂

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_pGT8Q_tjk

John

========REVISIONIST CARLOS PORTER: WEBER SHOULD QUIT

(As the readers of www.democratic-republicans.us know, I also urged Weber to quit, like the esteemed revisionist Carlos Porter, and I offered to run the IHR in Weber’s place. Today on a search engine such as Bing, Weber’s  name gets 300,000 hits and mine gets three million. WHO thus also understands how to get media publicity and headlines?)

From: carlos porter

===========GERMAN NEWSPAPER FACES WHITE DIE-OUT

It’s real, folks — Whites are literally dying out. The jew-guilt-tripped, brainwashed Germans (a better word would be “brainsoiled”) are among the worst in refusing to make babies.

But white Americans are not far behind. In fact, one night I lay there in bed mulling things over before sleep, and it occurred to me to count how many kids 25 important WN activists whom I knew and were over age 35  actually had.

These 25 WN activists over 35 had a grand total of 12 children. Half were childless!  I was a veritable baby-machine at two children!

A German comrade sent me this article by the Establishment newspaper Die Zeit [“Time” in German]. (http://www.zeit.de/meinung/2010-01/familienpolitik-geburtenrate) and I have translated it below:

* * *

Familienpolitik

Religiöser werden für mehr Kinder?

Deutschlands Einwohnerzahl schrumpft, Familienpolitik erhöht die Geburtenrate nicht. Religiosität schon, wie der Vergleich mit den USA und Irland zeigt. Ein Kommentar

• Von Malte Lehming
• Datum 23.1.2010 – 14:56 Uhr

Sei doch mal spontan! Entspann dich! Einige Aufforderungen sind nutzlos. Auf Befehl hin spontan zu sein, ist unmöglich. Mit dem Kinderkriegen verhält es sich ähnlich. Seit Jahren rufen deutsche Politiker ihren Landsleuten zu: Bekommt mehr Kinder! Und seit Jahren haut ihnen die Realität ihre familienpolitischen Großanstrengungen um die Ohren.

Das Statistische Bundesamt teilte jetzt mit, dass das Geburtendefizit in Deutschland – also die Zahl der Sterbefälle minus die der neugeborenen Kinder – auf dem höchsten Stand seit 1976 ist und die Bevölkerungszahl weiter schrumpft. Trotz aller Milliarden, die in Krippenplatzausbau und Elterngeld gesteckt werden, verschwindet jährlich eine Großstadt.

Folglich müsste noch etwas verschwinden – der Glaube an die Möglichkeiten des Staates, die Geburtenrate durch pekuniäre Maßnahmen entscheidend zu beeinflussen. Denn diese These darf als widerlegt gelten. Familienpolitik geht vom Ideal der Familienplanung aus: Wer Kinder bekommen kann ohne gravierende Einkommenseinbußen bei hoher beruflicher Flexibilität und gesicherter öffentlicher Kinderbetreuung, der bekommt auch Kinder. Was aber, wenn das nicht stimmt? Wenn die Frage des Nachwuchses weit weniger eine Frage der Bequemlichkeit ist, als angenommen?

In den USA und Irland gibt es so gut wie keine staatliche Familienförderung. Die Entscheidung für den Nachwuchs ist dort außerdem mit weit größeren Strapazen verbunden als bei uns. Dennoch weisen beide Länder die höchsten Geburtenraten innerhalb der entwickelten Industriestaaten auf.

Um das zu erklären, greifen Bevölkerungstheoretiker immer öfter auf den Faktor Religion zurück. National und international lässt sich sagen, dass religiös aktive Menschen weitaus mehr Kinder haben als ihre säkularen Nachbarn der gleichen Region sowie der gleichen Einkommens- und Bildungsschicht. Laut einer vom Heidelberger Religionswissenschaftler Michael Blume erstellten Tabelle existiert ein unmittelbarer Zusammenhang zwischen religiöser Aktivität (Beten, Gottesdienstbesuch) und Kinderzahl. Am wenigsten Kinder bekommen Konfessionslose.

Nun weisen auch katholische Länder wie Polen und Italien niedrige Geburtenraten auf, während Schweden und das laizistische Frankreich gut abschneiden. Daher muss zwischen tradierten und vitalen religiösen Gesellschaften unterschieden werden. Eine vitale Religionsgemeinschaft zeichnet sich durch starke religiöse Aktivität ihrer Mitglieder, ein hohes Maß an gemeindlicher Organisation, niedrige Scheidungsraten und die Pflege des transzendenten Zusatzargumentes für Familie und Kinder aus (Gottes Gebot: “Seid fruchtbar und mehret euch!”).

Brauchen wir eine Rückkehr zur Religion? Nicht unbedingt. In einer rapide alternden Gesellschaft müssen immer weniger Menschen immer mehr Geld erwirtschaften, damit die sozialen Sicherungssysteme (Rente, Gesundheit) nicht kollabieren. Wer den Glauben an die Familienpolitik verloren hat, aber zum Glauben an Gott nicht zurückkehren will, kann auch für eine massive Einwanderung plädieren und für eine rasche Aufnahme der Türkei in die EU.

TRANSLATION

* * *

Family Policy
Get more religious to get more children?

Germany’s population shrinks, and family policies does not increase the birth rate. Religiosity has, however, as shown by the U.S. and Ireland.

* From Malte Lehming
* Date 23.1.2010 – 14:56 Clock

© Michael Hanschke / dpa

Highly religious societies have more children. Do we therefore need a return to religion?

“Be spontaneous! Relax!” Some appeals are useless. No one can be spontaneous when ordered to do so. Having children is similar. For years, German politicians have been calling on their fellow countrymen: Make more children! And for years reality has given their huge efforts a kick in the head.

The [German] Federal Statistical Office announced now that falling birth rates in Germany – that is, newborn children minus deaths – are at their worst since 1976 and the population continues to shrink. Despite all the billions that will be put into expanding kindergartens, nursery schools and day care, every year the equivalent of a large German city DISAPPEARS.

Consequently, something else must disappear — the belief in the ability of the state to influence the birth rate significantly by pecuniary measures. [JdN: Right. The decision to have children cannot be a selfish, julike profit-loss calculation!]

The Germans had children again under Hitler because they were joyful, and felt secure economically, emotionally and militarily.

This thesis may be considered as refuted. [The German government’s] family policy starts from the ideal of the family having children without any serious loss of income, high professional mobility and secure public childcare. But what if they did not? If the question of having offspring is much less a matter of convenience than was assumed?

[JdN: “Assumed” by the Frankfurter School judeomarxists!]

In the U.S. and Ireland, there is almost no state financial support for families. The decision to procreate the next generation there is thus associated with far greater hardships than we face.  Nevertheless, both countries have the highest birthrates of all developed industrial countries.

To explain this, population theorists refer more and more  back to the ancient factor of religion. Nationally and internationally it can be said that religiously active people have far more children than their secular neighbors of the same region, income and educational level. According to statistics from religious scholar Michael Blume of Heidelberg,  there is a direct link between religious activity (prayer and church attendance) and the number of children. Those without any religious affiliation have the least children of all.

Nowadays, even Catholic countries like Poland and Italy have low birth rates, while Sweden and secularist France are doing well.

[JdN: This is misleading.  France is “doing well” 3/4s because Arab and African immigrants are having children! 1/4 of the increase is from the very good daycare for working mothers.]

Hence the necessity to distinguish between traditional and still vital religious communities. A vibrant religious community is characterized by strong religious activity of its members, a high degree of communal organization, low divorce rates and the additional transcendental argument for family and children, God’s commandment: “Be fruitful and multiply!”

Do we need a return to religion? Not necessarily.

[JdN: Now comes, in my opinion, a completely ironic conclusion that signals the opposite. One must understand that in Germany it is a felony hate-speech crime to say Third World immigration is bad.]

In a rapidly aging society, we have fewer and fewer people who need to earn more and more money so the social security system (retirement and health) do not financially collapse. Anyone who has lost faith in the government’s  family policy, but does not want to return to God, can always argue for more of this massive immigration — and for Turkey to rapidly enter the European Union.

=end= (JdN: in more ways than one! 😉 )