Name the jew — or hate our brothers they misled; the French Revolution was jews, satanists and white trash, NOT the true French nation (Part 1 of 2)

Captain RAMSAY:

The Nameless War

 

THE AUTHOR:

Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay was educated at Eton and the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd Battalion, Coldstream Guards, in the First World War until he was severely wounded in 1916 – thereafter he was posted to Regimental H.Q. and the War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end of the war.

From 1920 he became a Member of H.M. Scottish Bodyguard.

In 1931 he was elected a Member of Parliament for Midlothian and
Peeblesshire.

Arrested under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944.

On the following morning he resumed his seat in the House of Commons and remained there until the end of that Parliament in 1945.

THE NAMELESS WAR

Here is the story that people have said would never be written in our time — the true history of events leading up to the Second World War, told by one who enjoyed the friendship and confidence of Mr. Neville Chamberlain [photo] during the critical months between Munich and September, 1939.

.

There has long been an unofficial ban on books dealing with what Captain Ramsay calls ”The Nameless War,” the conflict which has been waged from behind the political scene for centuries, which is still being waged and of which very few are aware.

The publishers of The Nameless War believe this latest exposure will do more than any previous attempt to break the conspiracy of silence. The present work, with much additional evidence and a fuller historical background, is the outcome of the personal experiences of a public figure who in the course of duty has discovered at first-hand the existence of a centuries-old conspiracy against Britain, Europe, and the whole of Christendom.

The Nameless War reveals an unsuspected link between all the major revolutions in Europe – from King Charles I’s time to the abortive attempt against Spain in 1936. One single source of inspiration, design and supply is shown to be common to all of them.

These revolutions and the World War of 1939 are seen to be integral parts of one and the same master plan.

After a brief review of the forces behind the declaration of war and the worldwide arrests of many who endeavoured to oppose them, the author describes the anatomy of the Revolutionary International machine ” the machine which today continues the plan for supranational world power, the age-old Messianic dream of International Jewry.

It is the author’s belief that the machine would break down without the support of its unwilling Jews and unsuspecting Gentiles, and he puts forward suggestions for detaching these elements.

Christians say …

“Captain Ramsay, a Christian gentleman of unflagging courage, believed that the war with Germany was not conceived in the interests of Britain and could lead only to the extension of Communist and Jewish power.

Because he warned his fellow countrymen of the forces at work, he was put in prison without trial for 4+ years, for ‘reasons’ so preposterous that those who framed them dared not submit them to a court of law.”

For years Captain Ramsay had been a member of the British Parliament. His book is an analysis of the Jewish-Zionist war against Christian civilization.” (The Cross and the Flag)

But the Jews say of Ramsay …

“There is no limit to the depths of human depravity, but Captain Maule Ramsay … seems to have made a very determined attempt to plumb those depths.” (The Jewish Chronicle)

“The publication of such a book, at this time, underlines the urgent need for the law to be reformed so as to make it a crime to preach racial hatred or publish libels on groups in the community.” (The Daily Worker)

 

CONTENTS

PROLOGUE

l. THE BRITISH REVOLUTION

2. THE FRENCH REVOLUTION

3. THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION

4. DEVELOPMENT OF REVOLUTIONARY
TECHNIQUE

5. GERMANY BELLS THE CAT

6. 1933: JEWRY DECLARES WAR

7. “PHONEY WAR” ENDED BY CIVILIAN
BOMBING

8. DUNKIRK AND AFTER

9. THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME

10. PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT’S ROLE

11. REGULATION 18B

12. WHO DARES?

EPILOGUE
APPENDIX 1
APPENDIX 2
APPENDIX 3
APPENDIX 4
APPENDIX 5

[….]

The French Revolution

The French Revolution of 1789 was the most startling event in the history of Europe since the fall of Rome. A new phenomenon then appeared before the world.

Never before had a mob apparently organized successful revolution against all other classes in the state, under high-sounding, but quite nonsensical slogans, and with methods bearing not a trace of the principles enshrined in those slogans.

Never before had any one section of any nation conquered all other sections; and still less swept away every feature of the national life and tradition, from king, religion, nobles, clergy, constitution, flag, calendar, and place names, to coinage.

A silver écu coin of the Kingdom of France in 1781: Louis is (Latin texts) ”the king by the grace of God,” and ”may the name of the Lord be blessed”

In 1909, after a radical secularization, France is now “the French Republic” (no longer a nation but a republic, a subtle but important difference) and a rooster crows on the back about ”liberty, equality and fraternity.” God and nation are gone.

Such a phenomenon merits the closest attention, especially in view of the fact that it has been followed by identical outbreaks in many countries.

The main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this fact: the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France.

This revolution was the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything which had been France.

This conclusion is borne out by the references to “foreigners” in high places in the Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter Scott, but by Robespierre himself [painting].

.

We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they were not British, or Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals ; they were, of course, Jews.

Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :

“Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name of ‘Great.’ The secrets of its preparation are well known to us, for it was wholly the work of our hands.” Protocols of Zion ” No. 7.

“We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.’ The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides onto these baits, and with them carried away the well-being of the world.

The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could not see that in nature there is no equality.”

Protocols of Zion ” No. 1.

With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a concerted and connected human drama.

When we begin to draw parallels between the France of 1789, the Britain of 1640, the Russia of 1917, the Germany and the Hungary of 1918-19, and the Spain of 1936, we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense of reality.

“Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic.”

Even so, however, it must be obvious that immense organization, and vast resources, as well as cunning and secrecy far above the ordinary are necessary for its successful preparation.

It is amazing indeed that people should suppose that “mobs” or “the people” ever have, or ever could, undertake such a complicated and costly operation.

No mistake, moreover, could be more dangerous ; for it will result in total inability to recognize the true significance of events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary movement.

The process or organizing revolution is seen to be firstly the infliction of paralysis ; and secondly, the striking of the blow or blows.

It is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that [23] the secrecy is essential. Its outward signs are massive debt, loss of publicity control, and the existence of alien-influenced secret organizations in the doomed state.

Debt, particularly international debt, is the first and over-mastering grip.

Through it, men in high places are suborned, and alien powers and influences are introduced into the body politic.

When the debt grip has been firmly established, control of every form of publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full grip on industrialists.

The stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the right hand of finance established the paralysis; while it is the revolutionary left that holds the dagger and deals the fatal blow. Moral corruption facilitates the entire process.

By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France. The world’s big financiers were firmly established. “They possessed so large a share of the world’s gold and silver stocks, that they had most of Europe in their debt, certainly France.”

So writes Mr. McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and he continues, on page 38:

“A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth and had become debt.

In the old Europe, wealth had been measured in lands, crops, herds and minerals; but a new standard had now been introduced, namely, a form of money to which the title ‘credit’ had been given.”

French peasants till the land, whose food harvest was their wealth.

The debts of the French Kingdom, were substantial.

[JdN: France had borrowed the funds so King Louis XVI could generously finance the American Revolution and support it also with French troops and a fleet].

But this debt level was by no means insurmountable, except in terms of gold: and had the King’s advisers decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real wealth of France, the position could have been fairly easily righted.

As it was, the situation was firmly gripped by one financier after another, who either could not, or would not, break with the system imposed by the international usurers.

Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury [24] could only grow heavier and more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or silver, neither of which France produced.

And who were the potentates of the new debt machine, these manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions upon millions of usurious loans?

The late Lady Queenborough, in her important work, Occult Theocracy, gives us certain outstanding names, taking her facts from L’Anti-Semitisme by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894.

[NN: This work is a massive 700-page tome “exposing” secret societies like the Freemasons, and it was originally published in the UK in 1933.

Edith Starr Miller, also Lady Queensborough, the author of this book, was the daughter of an American industrialist who married an British nobleman.

She understood occult religions and secret societies as she experienced them first-hand — her husband was the 1st Baron of Queensborough, treasurer of the League of Nations and member of British Union of Fascists.

He had helped secure oil monopolies for John D. Rockefeller. Shortly after the book’s publication, Edith Starr Miller, age 45, died, as even as the occult Grand Lodge of Canada attested, “under suspicious circumstances.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edith_Starr_Miller

Excerpts:

Edith Starr Miller, Lady Queenborough (July 16, 1887 – January 16, 1933) was a New York socialite, author and anti-Mormon agitator who in 1921 became the second wife of Almeric Hugh Paget, 1st Baron Queenborough. [His grandfather had commanded the British cavalry at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815.]

[…]

Edith’s observations were outlined in her posthumously published Occult Theocracy,^[9] and added to the discussion of the secret societies and their conspiracies.

Her information was drawn from existing sources^{[citation needed]}, including the works of Dr. Karl Hacks and Léo Taxil ( pseudonym of Marie-Joseph Gabriel-Antoine Jogand-Pages; 1854-1907), Taxil’s supporter Abel Clarin de la Rive (1855-1914), Samuel Paul Rosen (1840-1907), theosophist Alice Bailey (1880-1949), Nesta Helen Webster (1876-1960), and esotericist Christina M. Stoddard, who wrote under the pseudonym “Inquire Within“.

The Pagets later separated, and Edith sued in New York for legal separation on January 8, 1932, citing cruelty.^[10]

Death[edit]

She died in Paris a year later, on January 16, 1933.^[11]

https://archive.org/details/OccultTheocrasy

*** [back to Ramsay]

In London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid and his brother Abraham Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta, their partner, and his nephew Sir Moses Montifiore, as being directly concerned in financing the French Revolution — along with Daniel Itsig of Berlin, his son-in-law, David Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace.

These names recall the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:

“The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible.”

And again :

“Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who … come begging with outstretched palm.”

No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France.

Sir Walter Scott, in his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 1, thus describes the situation [https://archive.org/details/lifenapoleonbuo07unkngoog] :

“These financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are treated by usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance with the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the most unreasonable recompenses for their advances.

By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were brought to total confusion.”

King Louis’ chief finance minister during these last years of growing confusion was Jacques Necker, “a Swiss” of German [25] extraction, son of a German professor of whom McNair Wilson writes:

Finance minister Jacques Necker’s January 1781 budget report to his majesty, the king of France

“Necker had forced his way into the King’s Treasury as a representative of the debt system and owning allegiance to that system.”

We can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in Necker; and when we add to this the fact that his previous record was that of a daring and unscrupulous speculator, we can understand why the national finances of France under his baneful aegis rapidly worsened, so that after four years of his manipulations, the unfortunate King’s government had contracted an additional and far more serious debt of 170,000,000 pounds. [JdN: Multiply that today by 30.]

By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England. By 1771 the movement had attained such proportions that Phillipe Duc de Chartres, afterwards d’Orleans [painting below], became Grand Master.

This type of Freemasonry was largely innocent, both in policy and personnel in its early days ; but as events proved, the real moving spirits behind it were ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.

.

The Duc d’Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of little principle, and an extravagant, vain and ambitious libertine, he had no motives beyond the ousting of the King, and the establishing of a democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch.

Having in addition but little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the first and most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men whom he probably scarcely knew.

And they sent him to the guillotine soon after his base and ignominious role had been played out.

The Marquis de Mirabeau [painting] who succeeded him as the leading figure of the Revolution was cast in much the same role.

He was a much abler man than d’Orleans, but so foul a libertine that he was shunned by all his own class, and imprisoned more than once at the instance of his own father.

[26] He is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn [photo], head of the Jewish Illuminati, and to have been more in the company of the Jewess, Mrs. Herz, than was her own husband.

He was not only an early figure-head in French Freemasonry in the respectable years, but he also introduced Illuminism [ = the Illuminati of Adam Weishaupt] into France.

Adam Weishaupt

This Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind Freemasonry.

The Illuminati penetrated into all the lodges of Grand Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and organized by cabalistic Jews.

It is interesting to note that the Duc d’Orleans and Talleyrand were both initiated into Illuminism by Mirabeau shortly after the latter had introduced it in France from Frankfurt, where its headquarters had been established in 1782 under Adam Weishaupt.

In 1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as though the heavenly powers themselves made a last-moment attempt to warn France and Europe against these massing powers of evil.

Lightning struck dead a messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon [ = today usually called by its German name, Regensburg].

Regensburg, once the seat of the ”Diet” or senate of the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation”

The police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world revolution.

Thereupon the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the Illuminati searched, and much further evidence was discovered.

French authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was too far advanced, and no action resulted.

By 1789 there were more than two thousand masonic ”Lodges” in France affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.

***Wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Orient_de_France

The Grand Orient requires no belief in a supreme being, and thus has atheistic members, which is forbidden in other branches of Freemasonry.

Interior of the Grand Orient temple in Paris; this order has 50,000 members in France and is militantly anti-Christian. It promotes race-mixing, mass immigration and judeophilia.

***

Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic Illuminism under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a strong secret organization covering the whole of France.

Under the Illuminati-worked  Freemasonry, and underneath that the Blue, or National, Masonry, it was all converted overnight into Grand Orient Masonry by Phillipe d’Orleans in 1773.

Little did he [Philippe, the duke of Orleans, dubbed “Égalité”after the French word for “equality”] suspect the satanic powers that he was invoking when he took that action — and satanic they certainly were.

The name Lucifer means “Light Bearer”; and ”Illuminati” those who were lit by that light.

By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May, 1789, the paralysis of the executive authority by the secret organizations was complete.

NN: The ”Estates General” was an ancient French institution, started back in the 1300s, a sort of parliament that consisted of three chambers that advised the king. One ”estate” was for the Catholic clergy,  another for the nobles, and the last for the commoners.

They had no actual power except to advise and assist the king, unlike, for example, the British parliament.

This institution was done away with in the French Revolution, and was replaced by one group, which still exists today, the “National Assembly.”

Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well advanced by then also.

And this was the manner of its accomplishment….

By 1780 the Duke d’Orleans’ entire income of 800,000 livres [meaning “pounds” in French], thanks to his reckless gambling and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.

In 1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing over his palace, estates, and houses, such as the Palais Royal….

….to his creditors, with powers to form there a centre of politics, printing, pamphleteering, gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops, theatres, art galleries, athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took the form of every variety of public debauchery.

In fact, ”Égalité’s” financial masters used his name and property to install a colossal organism for publicity and corruption, which appealed to every lowest instinct in human nature; and deluged the enormous crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and revolutionary output of its printing presses and debating clubs.

As Scudder writes in A Prince of the Blood: “It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the city.”

It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by the creditors at the Palais Royal was one Choderlos de Laclos [painting, right], a political adventurer of alien origin, author of The Liaisons Dangereuses, and other pornographic works …..who was said “to study the politics of love because of his love for politics.”

 

The 1989 Hollywood film ”Liaisons dangereuses” featured Glennn Close and John Malkovich

 

This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was linked with a series of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and most unscrupulous nature upon any public characters whom the Jacobins thought likely to stand in their [28] way.

This process was known as “L’infamie.”

JdN: This means a campaign to defame someone and make them ”infamous.” I have been a victim of it myself!

Marie Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this typically Jewish form of attack. No lie or abuse was too vile to level at her.

This Austrian was far more intelligent and energetic than her husband, the weak and indolent [King] Louis XVI, so Queen Marie Antoinette presented a considerable obstacle to the revolution.

.

She had, moreover, received many warnings regarding Freemasonry from her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time more awake to its significance than when she had written to her sister some years previously:

 

“I believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry too much about Freemasonry. 

Here it is far from having the significance that it may have elsewhere in Europe.

Here everything is open and one knows all.

Then where could the danger be?

One might well be worried if it were a question of a political secret society.

But, on the contrary, the government lets it spread, and it is only what it seems to be, an association the objects of which are unity and charity.

They dine, they sing, and they talk, which has given the King occasion to say that people who drink and sing are not to be suspected of organizing conspiracies.

Nor is it a society of atheists, for we are told ‘God is on the lips of all.’

They are very charitable. They bring up the children of their poor and dead members.

They endow their daughters.

What harm is there in all that?”

What harm indeed — if these blameless pretensions masked no darker designs?

Doubtless the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn reported on to them the contents of the Queen’s letter. We can imagine them shaking with laughter, and rubbing their hands in satisfaction —  hands that were itching to destroy the very life of France and her Queen.

These same men, at the appropriate hour, would give the signal that would convert their secret conspiracy into the “Massacres of September” and the bloodbaths of the guillotine.

In order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an elaborate hoax was arranged at the time, when [29] the jewish financiers and grain speculators were deliberately creating conditions of poverty and hunger in Paris.

A diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was ordered from the Court jewellers — in the Queen’s name, but by an agent of the Jacobins.

Queen Marie Antoinette

The unfortunate Queen knew nothing of this affair until the necklace was brought round to her for acceptance.

She naturally disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she would consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in so bad a financial way.

The printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full blast on to the subject; and every kind of criticism was leveled at the foreign-born Queen.

A further scandal was then engineered for the presses.

Some prostitute from the Palais Royal was engaged to disguise herself as the Queen; and by a forged letter the Cardinal Prince de Rohan was induced to meet this supposed Queen about midnight at the Palais Royal, supposing he was being asked for advice and help by the Queen on the subject of the necklace.

Louis René Edouard de Rohan-Guéméné before the Revolution

This event, needless to say, was immediately reported to the printing presses and pamphleteers, who started a further campaign containing the foulest innuendos that could be imagined concerning the whole affair.

The moving spirit behind the scene was Cagliostro [drawing], alias Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, [Italy], a doctor of the cabalistic art and a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at Frankfurt by Weishaupt in 1774.

When the necklace had finally served its slanderous purpose [of making the people hate their Queen], it was sent over to London, where most of the precious stones were retained by the Jew Eliason.

Attacks of a similar nature were directed against many other decent people who resisted the influence of the Jacobin clubs. After eight years of this work ,the process of paralysis by the jews’ mastery of publicity was complete.

In every respect, therefore, by the year 1789, when the financiers forced the King to summon the Estates General [JdN: like the early French version of Parliament], the first portion of their plans for revolution (i.e. paralysis) were [30] accomplished.

It now only remained to strike the blow or series of blows, which were to rob France of her throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her clergy, her gentry, her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture; leaving in their place, when the guillotine’s work was done, citizen ”hewers of wood and drawers of water” under an alien financial dictatorship.

NN: This is a reference to Joshua 9:23, where the Canaanites known as Gibeonites were condemned to serve as servants of the Jews and, to humiliate them, were assigned traditionally female occupations.

(continued here: )