John de Nugent

Obama lights up WHITE House in gay colors to celebrate Supreme Clourt decision approving “gay marriage”; Big Lie teller ruthlessly exposed on Sixty Minutes; medical diagnosis of judaism

June 28, 2015 John de Nugent English 0

Spread the love

……Obama orders WHITE House re-lit in “gay” colors (no, this is not a joke).

 

…..Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia in his scathing dissent from the SCOTUS for legalizing “gay marriage”: 

“Not a single evangelical Christian”, or “Genuine Westerner” on the Supreme Court

Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins dissenting admits on pages five and six of his dissenting opinion in the recent ruling of same sex marriage the court lacks diversity.

“Judges are selected precisely for their skill as lawyers; whether they reflect the policy views of a particular constituency is not (or should not be) relevant. Not surprisingly then, the Federal Judiciary is hardly a cross-section of America. Take, for example, this Court, which consists of only nine men and women, all of them successful lawyers (18) who studied at Harvard or Yale Law School. Four of the nine are natives of New York City. Eight of them grew up in east- and west-coast States. Only one hails from the vast expanse in-between. Not a single South-westerner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California does not count). Not a single evangelical Christian (a group that comprises about one quarter of Americans (19), or even a Protestant of any denomination. The strikingly unrepresentative character of the body voting on today’s social upheaval would be irrelevant if they were functioning as judges, answering the legal question whether the American people had ever ratified a constitutional provision that was understood to proscribe the traditional definition of marriage. But of course the Justices in today’s majority are not voting on that basis; they say they are not. And to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation.”

 

  • Kyle Bristow It is worth noting that just like in Romer v Evans, Scalia did not sign his dissenting opinion “I respectfully dissent.” Scalia has no respect for the leftists on the bench. No one has pointed this out yet.
    Like · Reply · 14 mins
    • John D. Nugent Oh wow, that IS significant! Thank you, Kyle, The SCOTUS is usually very bound by traditions of dignity, mutual respect, “the majesty of the law” and all that.

 

….sent me & others by Dr. Fredrick Toben

Twice-imprisoned Holocaust revisionism hero from Australia

 

Tara Brown to Belle Gibson: ˜You’re a pathological liar’

CHARLOTTE WILLIS and WENLEI MA , news.com.au, June 29, 2015 5:43AM

Belle Gibson on 60 Minutes Australia

[Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belle_Gibson]

 

Belle Gibson on 60 Minutes

.Belle Gibson appears on 60 Minutes to apologise for faking having brain cancer.

BELLE Gibson’s interview with Tara Brown took a tense turn last night, as the hard-hitting reporter confronted the disgraced wellness blogger with fresh evidence suggesting she knew all along that she didn’t have a brain tumour.

Brown hammered the 26-year-old shamed health guru, asking, “Do you accept that you’re a pathological liar?”

Gibson replied: “No.”

Gibson, who, in April, was forced to admit that she lied about having brain cancer and cured it through natural means, was offered no reprieve from Brown who was clearly fed up with her storytelling.

“You don’t have a good record on telling the truth, do you?” Brown put to her.

Belle Gibson appears on 60 Minutes to apologise for faking having brain cancer.Sitting face-to-face with Brown, Gibson teared up as she told how she “lost everything” after her cancer confession came to light.

But Gibson maintained that she didn’t deceive her followers or the public. She argued that she had been deceived. Gibson said she was told by an immunologist and neurologist, ˜Mark Johns’, that she had terminal brain cancer after he diagnosed her using a ˜frequency’ machine in her home several years ago.

“He went to my home and did a series of tests. There was a machine with lights on the front. There are two metal pads, one below the chair and one behind your back, measuring frequencies and then he said to me that I had a stage four brain tumour and that I had four months to live.

“At the time, I believed I was having radio therapy. When he gave me medication, I was told it was oral chemotherapy and I believed it.”

Belle Gibson had fooled many people for years with her story.

Belle Gibson had fooled many people for years with her story.

She said she believed him for years that she was living with the burden of a terminal illness.

60 Minutes has not been able to find any record of a ˜Mark Johns’.

However, her story didn’t stack up with the evidence, at all.

After the interview, Gibson handed over her medical records to 60 Minutes which showed that she had a brain scan at the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne in 2011, two years before she started to market her sob story to the public for profit and adulation.

Gibson said that she had that brain scan because she started to doubt the diagnosis ˜Johns’ had given her but that the scans had been directly sent to ˜Johns’ from the hospital. Johns then showed her a scan with brain cancer.

However, her medical records from the Alfred stated that she a 40-minute consultation with a neurologist there who told her that her brain scans were clear. But the reason she went to the Alfred for scans was not because of her brain cancer but because she believed she might have multiple sclerosis.

Brown put to Gibson that she had a history of claiming dramatic health problems and pointed out to her that she had previously said that in one year, 2009, she had three heart operations, two cardiac arrests, that she had died on the operating table and a stroke.

Gibson said she believed she had cancer until earlier this year. She said she uncovered the truth about her situation and was about to tell the media herself. The date she had picked for her own announcement, coincidentally, had been 10 days after the media broke the story about her deceptions.

She maintained that she is a victim and that she didn’t intentionally deceive anyone.

“I’m not trying to get away with anything. I’m not trying to smooth over anything. It’s not easy for me to be here.

“Once I figured out where I stood and I’d received the definitive ˜you don’t have cancer’ … it was traumatising.”

Brown shot back: “Traumatising that you don’t have cancer?”

Gibson replied: “I was feeling a huge amount of grief. That I had been lied to and that I had been taken for a ride.”

Gibson says she had been deceived by a ˜Mark Johns'.

Gibson says she had been deceived by a ˜Mark Johns’.

Brown asked her, “Do you take responsibility for driving any people away from conventional medicine?” Gibson responded: “I never intended on doing that … I accept that might have happened.”

Gibson also wouldn’t accept that she might have Munchausen syndrome, a psychiatric disorder in which someone feigns illness for sympathy. She said she didn’t make it up because she truly believed that she had cancer.

In another shock revelation, Gibson, who has a four-year-old son called Olivier, finally admitted to having lied about her age after friends insisted she was older than her 23 years.

“I would be 26,” she said.

But this wasn’t a simple affair. Gibson said that she was two birth certificates and had changed her name four times but that the most recent deed poll certificate with her date of birth said that she was 23 but that she been raised to believe that she would now be 26.

Before going to air, Gibson’s 60 Minutes appearance sparked backlash on social media, with many criticising Nine’s decision to give the mother-of-one “a platform” to make even more excuses, along with a reported $45,000 payment to partake in the interview.

“I am totally incensed that 60 minutes [sic] is giving this charlatan’s story oxygen,” one social media user commented, among hundreds more firing up online.

An online petition was even started via Change.org, calling on Gibson to donate the reported money paid to cancer research.

But the tell-all, Gibson’s first televised interview since her cancer story was exposed, has been praised by viewers, impressed by Brown’s relentless questioning and not allowing Gibson to dodge any of the big questions.

Gibson took in over $1 million in profits from her cookbook and wellness app, The Whole Pantry. In April, it was revealed that she failed to donate $300,000 from the sales of the app to charity as promised. Victoria Police later said they would not pursue criminal charges against her.

Gibson went into hiding as her story began to unravel. Her private and business social media accounts were all wiped clean and her Australian and overseas publishers pulled her cookbook from shelves. Gibson’s award-winning app was also pulled.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainment/television/tara-brown-to-belle-gibson-youre-a-pathological-liar/story-fni0cc2a-1227419144636?sv=268ae3be26b3489797c8225dbe569240&utm_source=Herald%20Sun&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=editorial

……What this means

Dr. Toben is constrained by the Jewstralian government, which has imprisoned him and seized his passport so he cannot travel abroad, from saying what the greater relevance of all this is. (He also spent months in prison in England until liberated through the tireless efforts of the beautiful Lady Michele Renouf. [photo]

But America being still a more-or-less free country, at least legally, I will say this is about the massive criminal fraud known in the jewsmedia as the “Nazi Holocaust of the Jews, ” which in effect founded the State Of Israel, and was used to prod America and Germany to give the Jews hundreds of billions of dollars in reparations or aid.

And it is about the central trait of psychopathic lying in this fiendish anti-people.

The powerful video cartoon “Attack on White Nations” says it all, and unforgettably. Jewish lies about “evil, jew-murdering Nazis” were used to crush the valiant white nation of Germany and then all the rest! https://vimeo.com/107608597

Attack on the White Nations from Bez cenzure on Vimeo.

At 0:54 the Eternal Jew gets to his punch line:

 

Now why is this specifically PSYCHOPATHIC?

As my essay here points out (https://johndenugent.com/psychopaths-in-power/):

The signs of psychopathy are:

  1. Glib and superficial charm;
  2. Grandiose sense of self-worth; narcissism; seeing the self as the center of the universe; feeling no one else is human, only I;
  3. Focused self-advancement without losing any energy on others except as stepping-stones;
  4. No moral taboos or inhibitions as to methods, aiding career success until caught;
  5. Need for constant stimulation, action, and new ways to avoid boredom; typical actions of the psychopathic child include a) torturing animals, b) the deliberate setting of fires and 3) urinating in one’s own bed (though young children may do this rarely, and accidentally, they do not do this alongside setting fires and animal torture)
  6. Lying as an art form to fine-tune and a source of pride;
  7. Targeting and manipulation of the gullible;
  8. Enticing people they do not love to naively love them;
  9. Skill at faking emotions, including love, sincerity and regret;
  10. Doing good work and good deeds solely to advance oneself;
  11. Ruthlessness and “stopping at nothing”;
  12. Enjoyment of the power to coldly end close relationships;
  13. “Getting others back” as a peak experience;
  14. Desire for vengeance when spurned;
  15. Pleasure in firing or ruining people. In the U.S., where highly profitable firms routinely cut good employees to boost stock values, there are professional terminators who roam the country cutting staff and personally firing them;
  16. Abuse and literal torture of living creatures;
  17. Humiliating others physically, verbally, emotionally, psychologically or sexually;
  18. Denigrating one’s own child or mate;
  19. Callousness; lack of empathy and compassion;
  20. Shallow or no feelings for others, even mates, children and friends;
  21. No ability to feel remorse or undergo inner repentance;
  22. Regret solely at being caught, embarrassed or punished;
  23. Incomprehension of the angry reactions of those they hurt;
  24. Underestimation of their own anger;
  25. No sense of responsibility for one’s actions;
  26. Parasitical world view: living by scams and not hard work;
  27. Contempt for those who “play by the rules”;
  28. Criminal talent, energy and innovativeness;
  29. Warlike courage far above the norm;

  30. Playing on the sympathy of others.

  31. To this one might add, in the purely subjective, non-scientific eye of many beholders, a curious dead look in the eyes of a psychopath, and that is the chilling part. Others speak of looking into such eyes and having a feeling that nothing is there.

As my essay further points out, the world-infamous serial killer Ted Bundy of Florida would pretend to be a student at Florida State University and hobble around on crutches to gain the sympathy of attractive white women, such as initially getting them to hold the door for him. Then he would thank them and chat them up.

Charming, handsome and charismatic, Bundy would con his way into his at least thirty female victims’ confidence, lull them to his car, and beat them unconscious with a blunt object. After driving around with victims, sometimes for hours, continually assaulting them sexually — nearly all of them white and quite attractive — Bundy would strangle them to death with nylon stockings. In at least a dozen instances, he would hack the women’s heads off with a saw and keep them as trophies. He was a known necrophiliac (that is, he had sex with the corpses of his victims).

The Jews’ goal is pure psychopathology: lies, torture, enslavement and mass murder. They are a religion of Ted Bundys.

Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn, bestselling author of The Gulag Archipelago

and inmate in the Soviet gulag for 11 years, to US author David Duke in 2002 in Moscow

solzhenitsyn-on-bolsheviks

solzhenitsyn-in-gulag

Scene from the Bolshevik Cheka dungeon: an anticommunist man is tortured to death with a red-hot poker

gulag-drawing

…..Didja ever wonder?

“Have you ever wondered why Japan was allowed to retain its Emperor after WWII ? The same Emperor who was on the throne when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor ?  Have you ever wondered why Japan was allowed to retain the same flag its armed forces served under during WWII and even to this day its air force planes use the same red ball on their fuselages and wings that they used on their kamakazis which flew into the American fleets.. 

1945

japanese-zero-flyby-mount-fuji

2015 Japanese -built F-2 fighter jet

japan-f-2-attack-figher-jet

Then look what happened to Germany ¦.. All vestiges of the Third Reich were destroyed. The national flag was changed and the swastika banned ¦  

1945 Messerschmitt 262 jet fighter with swastika on tail

me-262-art

Why were Germanic symbols targeted and not the Japanese ?  This is a fair question !” (Bill Bell)

[JdN: I see my video below, which I created in 2011, now up on many platforms, such as Vimeo]

https://vimeo.com/130575841

 

…..How to tell when someone is lying

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/how-to-tell-when-someone-s-lying-202644

 

SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY

How to tell when someone’s lying

UCLA psychologist helps law enforcement agencies tell truth from deception

Stuart Wolpert |

When someone is acting suspiciously at an airport, subway station or other public space, how can law enforcement officers determine whether he’s up to no good?
The ability to effectively detect deception is crucial to public safety, particularly in the wake of renewed threats against the U.S. following the killing of Osama bin Laden.
UCLA professor of psychology R. Edward Geiselman has been studying these questions for years and has taught investigative interviewing techniques to detectives and intelligence officers from the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the Marines, the Los Angeles police and sheriff’s departments, and numerous international agencies.
He and three former UCLA undergraduates ” Sandra Elmgren, Chris Green and Ida Rystad ”analyzed some 60 studies on detecting deception and have conducted original research on the subject. They present their findings and their guidance for how to conduct effective training programs for detecting deception in the current (April) issue of the American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, which is published this week.
Geiselman and his colleagues have identified several indicators that a person is being deceptive. The more reliable red flags that indicate deceit, Geiselman said, include:
¢ When questioned, deceptive people generally want to say as little as possible. Geiselman initially thought they would tell an elaborate story, but the vast majority give only the bare-bones. Studies with college students, as well as prisoners, show this. Geiselman’s investigative interviewing techniques are designed to get people to talk.
¢ Although deceptive people do not say much, they tend to spontaneously give a justification for what little they are saying, without being prompted.
¢ They tend to repeat questions before answering them, perhaps to give themselves time to concoct an answer.
¢ They often monitor the listener’s reaction to what they are saying. “They try to read you to see if you are buying their story,” Geiselman said.
¢ They often initially slow down their speech because they have to create their story and monitor your reaction, and when they have it straight “will spew it out faster,” Geiselman said. Truthful people are not bothered if they speak slowly, but deceptive people often think slowing their speech down may look suspicious. “Truthful people will not dramatically alter their speech rate within a single sentence,” he said.
¢ They tend to use sentence fragments more frequently than truthful people; often, they will start an answer, back up and not complete the sentence.
¢ They are more likely to press their lips when asked a sensitive question and are more likely to play with their hair or engage in other “grooming” behaviors. Gesturing toward one’s self with the hands tends to be a sign of deception; gesturing outwardly is not.
¢ Truthful people, if challenged about details, will often deny that they are lying and explain even more, while deceptive people generally will not provide more specifics.
¢ When asked a difficult question, truthful people will often look away because the question requires concentration, while dishonest people will look away only briefly, if at all, unless it is a question that should require intense concentration.
If dishonest people try to mask these normal reactions to lying, they would be even more obvious, Geiselman said. Among the techniques he teaches to enable detectives to tell the truth from lies are:
¢ Have people tell their story backwards, starting at the end and systematically working their way back. Instruct them to be as complete and detailed as they can. This technique, part of a “cognitive interview” Geiselman co-developed with Ronald Fisher, a former UCLA psychologist now at Florida International University, “increases the cognitive load to push them over the edge.” A deceptive person, even a “professional liar,” is “under a heavy cognitive load” as he tries to stick to his story while monitoring your reaction.
¢ Ask open-ended questions to get them to provide as many details and as much complete information as possible (“Can you tell me more about…?” “Tell me exactly…”). First ask general questions, and only then get more specific.
¢ Don’t interrupt, let them talk and use silent pauses to encourage them to talk.
If someone in an airport or other public space is behaving suspiciously and when approached exhibits a majority of the more reliable red flags, Geiselman recommends pulling him or her aside for more questioning. If there are only one or two red flags, he would probably let them go.
Geiselman tested techniques for telling the truth from deception with hundreds of UCLA students, and the studies he and his co-authors analyzed involved thousands of people.
Detecting deception is difficult, Geiselman said, but training programs can be effective. Programs must be extensive, with an education phase followed by numerous video examples, and a phase in which those being trained judge video clips and simulate real-world interviewing. Training should be conducted on multiple days over a period of a week or two.
“People can learn to perform better at detecting deception,” Geiselman said. “However, police departments usually do not provide more than a day of training for their detectives, if that, and the available research shows that you can’t improve much in just a day.”
When Geiselman conducted training with Marine intelligence officers, he found that they were impressively accurate in detecting deception even before the training began. In contrast, the average college student is only 53 percent accurate without training, and with abbreviated training, “we often make them worse,” he said.
“Without training, many people think they can detect deception, but their perceptions are unrelated to their actual ability. Quick, inadequate training sessions lead people to over-analyze and to do worse than if they go with their gut reactions.”
Geiselman is currently developing a training program that he hopes will effectively compress the learning curve and thus will serve to replicate years of experience.
The cognitive interview that Geiselman and Fisher developed works well with both criminal suspects and eyewitnesses of crimes. Geiselman thinks these techniques are likely to work in non-crime settings as well, but said additional research should be done in this area.
In the next year, Geiselman plans to teach police detectives techniques for investigative interviewing and spotting deception through the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Rural Policing Institute for underserved police departments. He says this will be a perfect fit for him because he comes from Culver, Ind., a small town that has fewer residents than UCLA has psychology majors.
Later this month, Geiselman will travel to Hong Kong to provide training in investigative interviewing to the Independent Commission Against Corruption.
An instructional course Geiselman taught on investigative interviewing before the second Iraq war resulted in cognitive interviewing techniques that were used to interdict some insurgent activity in Iraq, perhaps saving many lives, he was later informed.
Geiselman also has worked with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department on effective techniques for interviewing children who may have been molested and has interviewed crime victims for police departments around the country in murder cases gone cold. His research has been funded by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 
UCLA is California’s largest university, with an enrollment of more than 38,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The UCLA College of Letters and Science and the university’s 11 professional schools feature renowned faculty and offer 328 degree programs and majors. UCLA is a national and international leader in the breadth and quality of its academic, research, health care, cultural, continuing education and athletic programs. Six alumni and five faculty have been awarded the Nobel Prize.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


Copyright © 2024 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes